Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2513204.2513222acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Annotation of clausal functional information for semantic retrieval

Published: 28 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

The study of language functions is closely associated with the semantic and pragmatic aspects of language. While data driven approaches have been successfully applied on retrieval of functional-semantic information at the discourse level, the work at the clause level is still largely absent. In this paper, we annotate an initial corpus with Systemic Functional Linguistics, a prominent framework for the analysis of language functions at the sentence/clause level. The annotated corpus makes it possible to train a classifier to automatically classify functional processes at the clausal level. With an initial computational resource, the linking and interoperation between the two levels of functional information is now possible, giving rise to a range of potential applications in functional/semantic retrieval.

References

[1]
Bird, S. et al. 2009. Natural language processing with Python. O'reilly.
[2]
Bird, S. and Liberman, M. 1999. Annotation graphs as a framework for multidimensional linguistic data analysis. Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging - Proceedings of the Workshop (1999).
[3]
Carlson, L. et al. 2003. Building a discourse-tagged corpus in the framework of rhetorical structure theory. Springer.
[4]
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society. 3, 2 (1992), 193--217.
[5]
Feng, V. W. and Hirst, G. 2012. Text-level discourse parsing with rich linguistic features. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1 (2012), 60--68.
[6]
Halliday, M. A. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. (2004).
[7]
Hernault, H. et al. 2010. HILDA: a discourse parser using support vector machine classification. Dialogue & Discourse. 1, 3 (2010).
[8]
Honnibal, M. and Curran, J. R. 2007. Creating a systemic functional grammar corpus from the penn treebank. Proceedings of the Workshop on Deep Linguistic Processing (2007), 89--96.
[9]
Klein, D. and Manning, C. D. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics-Volume 1 (2003), 423--430.
[10]
Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text. 8, 3 (1988), 243--281.
[11]
Marcus, M. et al. 1994. The Penn Treebank: annotating predicate argument structure. Proceedings of the workshop on Human Language Technology (1994), 114--119.
[12]
Teich, E. 1999. Systemic functional grammar in natural language generation: Linguistic description and computational representation. MIT Press.
[13]
Whitelaw, C. et al. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (2005), 625--631.
[14]
Whitelaw, C. and Patrick, J. 2004. Selecting systemic features for text classification. Proc. Australasian Language Technology Workshop (2004).
[15]
Yan, H. and Webster, J. 2012. Collaborative Annotation and Visualization of Functional and Discourse Structures. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2012) (2012), 366--374.

Index Terms

  1. Annotation of clausal functional information for semantic retrieval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESAIR '13: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on Exploiting semantic annotations in information retrieval
    October 2013
    68 pages
    ISBN:9781450324137
    DOI:10.1145/2513204
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 October 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. functional role labeling
    2. semantic annotation
    3. semantic retrieval

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    CIKM'13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ESAIR '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 21 submissions, 67%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 55 submissions, 64%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 108
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media