Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2671188.2749326acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmrConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Image Retrieval by User-oriented Ranking

Published: 22 June 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Tag-based image search is an important method to process images contributed by social users in social media sharing websites like Flickr. However, existing ranking methods for tag-based image search frequently return results that are irrelevant, low-diversity or time-consuming. In this paper, we propose a user-oriented image ranking system with the consideration of image relevance, diversity and computation complexity, aiming to automatically rank images according to their visual information, semantic information and social clues. When you input a query in the user-oriented image search engine, images tagged with query are obtained as the initial results. The initial results include images contributed by different social users. Usually each user contributes several images. First we sort these users by inter-user ranking. Users that have a higher contribution to the given query rank higher. Then we sequentially implement intra-user ranking on the ranked user's image set, and only the most relevant image in each user's image set is selected. These selected images compose the final retrieval results. Experimental results on Flickr dataset show that our user-oriented ranking method is effective and efficient.

References

[1]
D. Cai, X. He, Z. Li, W. Y. Ma, J. R. Wen. "Hierarchical clustering of WWW image search results using visual, textual and link information," In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, pp. 952--959, 2004.
[2]
X. Qian, G. Liu, D. Guo. Object categorization using hierarchical wavelet packet texture descriptors. in Proc. ISM 2009, pp.44--51.
[3]
D. Liu, X. S. Hua, M. Wang. "Boost search relevance for tag-based social image retrieval," In IEEE International Conference, pp. 1636--1639, 2009.
[4]
R. H. van Leuken, L. Garcia, X. Olivares. "Visual diversification of image search results." In Proceedings of the 18th international conference, pp. 341--350, ACM, 2009.
[5]
K. Yang, M. Wang, X. S. Hua. "Social image search with diverse relevance ranking." In Multimedia Modeling, pp. 174--184, 2010.
[6]
M. Wang, K. Yang, X. S. Hua. "Towards a relevant and diverse search of social images." Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on,12(8), 829--842, 2010.
[7]
X. Qian, H. Wang, G. Liu, X. Hou, "HWVP: Hierarchical Wavelet Packet Texture Descriptors and Their Applications in Scene Categorization and Semantic Concept Retrieval", Multimedia Tools and Applications, May 2012.
[8]
F. Sun, M. Wang, D. Wang. "Optimizing social image search with multiple criteria: Relevance, diversity, and typicality." Neurocomputing,95, 40--47, 2012.
[9]
A. Ksibi, A. B. Ammar. "Adaptive diversification for tag-based social image retrieval." International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 3(1), 29--39, 2014

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)POI Summarization by Aesthetics Evaluation From Crowd Source Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.276945427:3(1178-1189)Online publication date: Mar-2018
  • (2017)Image Re-Ranking Based on Topic DiversityIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.269962326:8(3734-3747)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
  • (2016)A survey on Flickr multimedia research challengesEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.00651:C(71-91)Online publication date: 1-May-2016

Index Terms

  1. Image Retrieval by User-oriented Ranking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICMR '15: Proceedings of the 5th ACM on International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval
    June 2015
    700 pages
    ISBN:9781450332743
    DOI:10.1145/2671188
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 June 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. co-occurrence word
    2. social clues
    3. social media
    4. tag-based image retrieval

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Funding Sources

    • NSFC
    • Program 973
    • Microsoft Research Asia
    • Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities

    Conference

    ICMR '15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ICMR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 48 of 127 submissions, 38%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 830 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)POI Summarization by Aesthetics Evaluation From Crowd Source Social MediaIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.276945427:3(1178-1189)Online publication date: Mar-2018
    • (2017)Image Re-Ranking Based on Topic DiversityIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.269962326:8(3734-3747)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2017
    • (2016)A survey on Flickr multimedia research challengesEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.00651:C(71-91)Online publication date: 1-May-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media