Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2678025.2701406acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Getting the Message?: A Study of Explanation Interfaces for Microblog Data Analysis

Published: 18 March 2015 Publication History

Abstract

In many of today's online applications that facilitate data exploration, results from information filters such as recommender systems are displayed alongside traditional search tools. However, the effect of prediction algorithms on users who are performing open-ended data exploration tasks through a search interface is not well understood. This paper describes a study of three interface variations of a tool for analyzing commuter traffic anomalies in the San Francisco Bay Area. The system supports novel interaction between a prediction algorithm and a human analyst, and is designed to explore the boundaries, limitations and synergies of both. The degree of explanation of underlying data and algorithmic process was varied experimentally across each interface. The experiment (N=197) was performed to assess the impact of algorithm transparency/explanation on data analysis tasks in terms of search success, general insight into the underlying data set and user experience. Results show that 1) presence of recommendations in the user interface produced a significant improvement in recall of anomalies, 2) participants were able to detect anomalies in the data that were missed by the algorithm, 3) participants who used the prediction algorithm performed significantly better when estimating quantities in the data, and 4) participants in the most explanatory condition were the least biased by the algorithm's predictions when estimating quantities.

References

[1]
Ahn, J.-w., and Brusilovsky, P. Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval. Information Processing & Management 49, 5 (2013), 1139--1164.
[2]
Amar, R. A., and Stasko, J. T. Knowledge precepts for design and evaluation of information visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 11, 4 (2005), 432--442.
[3]
Arnold, V., Clark, N., Collier, P. A., Leech, S. A., and Sutton, S. G. The differential use and effect of knowledge-based system explanations in novice and expert judgment decisions. Mis Quarterly (2006), 79--97.
[4]
Bilgic, M., and Mooney, R. J. Explaining recommendations: Satisfaction vs. promotion. In Beyond Personalization Workshop, IUI, vol. 5 (2005).
[5]
Bostandjiev, S., O'Donovan, J., and Höllerer, T. Tasteweights: a visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In RecSys, P. Cunningham, N. J. Hurley, I. Guy, and S. S. Anand, Eds., ACM (2012), 35--42.
[6]
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., and Gosling, S. D. Amazon's mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1 (2011), 3--5.
[7]
Chang, R., Ziemkiewicz, C., Green, T. M., and Ribarsky, W. Defining insight for visual analytics. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 29, 2 (2009), 14--17.
[8]
Daly, E. M., Lecue, F., and Bicer, V. Westland row why so slow?: fusing social media and linked data sources for understanding real-time traffic conditions. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, ACM (2013), 203--212.
[9]
Fleder, D. M., and Hosanagar, K. Recommender systems and their impact on sales diversity. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, ACM (2007), 192--199.
[10]
Giridhar, P., Amin, M. T. A., Abdelzaher, T. F., Kaplan, L. M., George, J., and Ganti, R. K. Clarisense: Clarifying sensor anomalies using social network feeds. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops, PerCom 2014 Workshops, Budapest, Hungary, March 24-28, 2014 (2014), 395--400.
[11]
Gratzl, S., Gehlenborg, N., Lex, A., Pfister, H., and Streit, M. Domino: Extracting, comparing, and manipulating subsets across multiple tabular datasets. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 12 (Dec 2014), 2023--2032.
[12]
Gregor, S., and Benbasat, I. Explanations from intelligent systems: Theoretical foundations and implications for practice. MIS quarterly (1999), 497--530.
[13]
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW '00, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2000), 241--250.
[14]
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of ACM CSCW'00 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (2000), 241--250.
[15]
Knijnenburg, B. P., Bostandjiev, S., O'Donovan, J., and Kobsa, A. Inspectability and control in social recommenders. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems, ACM (2012), 43--50.
[16]
McCarthy, K., Reilly, J., McGinty, L., and Smyth, B. Experiments in dynamic critiquing. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '05, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2005), 175--182.
[17]
North, C. Toward measuring visualization insight. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26, 3 (2006), 6--9.
[18]
O'Donovan, J., Smyth, B., Gretarsson, B., Bostandjiev, S., and Höllerer, T. Peerchooser: visual interactive recommendation. In CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2008), 1085--1088.
[19]
Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., and Davidenko, N. Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45, 4 (2009), 867--872.
[20]
Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P. G. Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making 5 (2010), 411--419.
[21]
Parra, D., Brusilovsky, P., and Trattner, C. See what you want to see: visual user-driven approach for hybrid recommendation. In IUI'14 19th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI'14, Haifa, Israel, February 24-27, 2014 (2014), 235--240.
[22]
Ren, D., Hollerer, T., and Yuan, X. ivisdesigner: Expressive interactive design of information visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 20, 12 (Dec 2014), 2092--2101.
[23]
Schaffer, J., Abdelzaher, T., Jones, D., Hollerer, T., Gonzalez, C., Harman, J., and O'Donovan, J. Truth, lies, and data: Credibility representation in data analysis. In Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA), 2014 IEEE International Inter-Disciplinary Conference on, IEEE (2014), 28--34.
[24]
Sinha, R., and Swearingen, K. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In CHI'02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2002), 830--831.
[25]
Tintarev, N., and Masthoff, J. A survey of explanations in recommender systems. In Data Engineering Workshop, 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on, IEEE (2007), 801--810.
[26]
Tintarev, N., O'Donovan, J., Brusilovsky, P., Felfernig, A., Semeraro, G., and Lops, P. Recsys' 14 joint workshop on interfaces and human decision making for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, ACM (2014), 383--384.
[27]
Yi, J. S., ah Kang, Y., Stasko, J. T., and Jacko, J. A. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on 13, 6 (2007), 1224--1231.
[28]
Yi, J. S., Kang, Y.-a., Stasko, J. T., and Jacko, J. A. Understanding and characterizing insights: how do people gain insights using information visualization? In Proceedings of the 2008 Workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization, ACM (2008), 4.
[29]
Zhang, J., and Pu, P. A comparative study of compound critique generation in conversational recommender systems. In In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH2006, Springer (2006), 234--243.
[30]
Zhang, J., Wang, Y., and Vassileva, J. Socconnect: A personalized social network aggregator and recommender. Information Processing and Management 49, 3 (2013), 721--737.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Using Machine Learning to Improve Interactive Visualizations for Large Collected Traffic Detector DataProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645177(803-816)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Demo: an Interactive Visualization Combining Rule-Based and Feature Importance ExplanationsProceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3605390.3610811(1-4)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Follow the Successful Herd: Towards Explanations for Improved Use and Mental Models of Natural Language SystemsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584088(220-239)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Getting the Message?: A Study of Explanation Interfaces for Microblog Data Analysis

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IUI '15: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
    March 2015
    480 pages
    ISBN:9781450333061
    DOI:10.1145/2678025
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 March 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anomaly detection
    2. data mining
    3. intelligent user interfaces

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    IUI'15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    IUI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 47 of 205 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 746 of 2,811 submissions, 27%

    Upcoming Conference

    IUI '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)34
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Using Machine Learning to Improve Interactive Visualizations for Large Collected Traffic Detector DataProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645177(803-816)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Demo: an Interactive Visualization Combining Rule-Based and Feature Importance ExplanationsProceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3605390.3610811(1-4)Online publication date: 20-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Follow the Successful Herd: Towards Explanations for Improved Use and Mental Models of Natural Language SystemsProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584088(220-239)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Modeling Adaptive Expression of Robot Learning Engagement and Exploring Its Effects on Human TeachersACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/357181330:5(1-48)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2023
    • (2023)On Selective, Mutable and Dialogic XAI: a Review of What Users Say about Different Types of Interactive ExplanationsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581314(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Why Am I Not Seeing It? Understanding Users’ Needs for Counterfactual Explanations in Everyday RecommendationsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3531146.3533189(1330-1340)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2022
    • (2020)A Machine Learning-Based Micro-World Platform for Condition-Based Maintenance2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/SMC42975.2020.9283448(288-295)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2020
    • (2020)Explainable Recommendations in Intelligent Systems: Delivery Methods, Modalities and RisksResearch Challenges in Information Science10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_13(212-228)Online publication date: 25-Jun-2020
    • (2019)Designing for empowerment – An investigation and critical reflectionit - Information Technology10.1515/itit-2018-003661:1(59-65)Online publication date: 4-Jan-2019
    • (2019)Explaining recommendations in an interactive hybrid social recommenderProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3301275.3302318(391-396)Online publication date: 17-Mar-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media