Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3077981.3078039acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rich gesture, reduced control: the influence of constrained mappings on performance technique

Published: 28 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents an observational study of the interaction of professional percussionists with a simplified hand percussion instrument. We reflect on how the sound-producing gestural language of the percussionists developed over the course of an hour session, focusing on the elements of their gestural vocabulary that remained in place at the end of the session, and on those that ceased to be used. From these observations we propose a model of movement-based digital musical instruments as a projection downwards from a multidimensional body language to a reduced set of sonic features or behaviours. Many factors of an instrument's design, above and beyond the mapping of sensor degrees of freedom to dimensions of control, condition the way this projection downwards happens. We argue that there exists a world of richness of gesture beyond that which the sensors capture, but which can be implicitly captured by the design of the instrument through its physicality, constituent materials and form. We provide a case study of this model in action.

References

[1]
Klaus-Ernst Behne and Clemens Wöllner. 2011. Seeing or hearing the pianists? A synopsis of an early audiovisual perception experiment and a replication. Musicae Scientiae 15, 3 (2011), 324--342.
[2]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[3]
Mine Doğantan-Dack. 2011. In the beginning was gesture: Piano touch and the phenomenology of the performing body. New perspectives on music and gesture (2011), 243--65.
[4]
Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press.
[5]
Georg Essl and Sile O'modhrain. 2006. An enactive approach to the design of new tangible musical instruments. Organised sound 11, 03 (2006), 285--296.
[6]
Rolf Inge Godøy, Minho Song, Kristian Nymoen, Mari Romarheim Haugen, and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2016. Exploring Sound-Motion Similarity in Musical Experience. Journal of New Music Research 45, 3 (2016), 210--222.
[7]
Michael Gurevich, Paul Stapleton, and Adnan Marquez-Borbon. 2010. Style and Constraint in Electronic Musical Instruments. In NIME. 106--111.
[8]
Michael S Horn. 2013. The role of cultural forms in tangible interaction design. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 117--124.
[9]
Andy Hunt, Marcelo M Wanderley, and Matthew Paradis. 2003. The importance of parameter mapping in electronic instrument design. Journal of New Music Research 32, 4 (2003), 429--440.
[10]
Robert H Jack, Tony Stockman, and Andrew McPherson. 2016. Effect of latency on performer interaction and subjective quality assessment of a digital musical instrument. In Proceedings of the Audio Mostly 2016. ACM, 116--123.
[11]
Alexander Refsum Jensenius, Marcelo M Wanderley, Rolf Inge Godøy, and Marc Leman. 2009. Musical Gestures: concepts and methods in research. In Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning, Rolf Inge Godøy and Marc Leman (Eds.). Routledge, 12--35.
[12]
Gordon Kurtenbach and Eric A Hulteen. 1990. Gestures in human-computer communication. The art of human-computer interface design (1990), 309--317.
[13]
Marc Leman. 2008. Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. MIT Press.
[14]
Annie Luciani, Jean-Loup Florens, Damien Couroussé, and Claude Cadoz. 2007. Ergotic sounds: A new way to improve playability, believability and presence of digital musical instruments. In ENACTIVE/07. ACROE, 373--376.
[15]
Thor Magnusson. 2010. Designing constraints: Composing and performing with digital musical systems. Computer Music Journal 34, 4 (2010), 62--73.
[16]
Mark T Marshall, Max Hartshorn, Marcelo M Wanderley, and Daniel J Levitin. 2009. Sensor choice for parameter modulations in digital musical instruments: Empirical evidence from pitch modulation. JNMR 38, 3 (2009), 241--253.
[17]
Andrew McPherson and Victor Zappi. 2015. An environment for submillisecond-latency audio and sensor processing on BeagleBone Black. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 138. Audio Engineering Society.
[18]
Carolina Brum Medeiros and Marcelo M Wanderley. 2014. A comprehensive review of sensors and instrumentation methods in devices for musical expression. Sensors 14, 8 (2014), 13556--13591.
[19]
Eduardo Reck Miranda and Marcelo M Wanderley. 2006. New digital musical instruments: control and interaction beyond the keyboard. Vol. 21. AR Editions.
[20]
Luc Nijs, Micheline Lesaffre, and Marc Leman. 2009. The musical instrument as a natural extension of the musician. In the 5th Conference of Interdisciplinary Musicology. 132--133.
[21]
Sile O'modhrain. 2011. A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Computer Music Journal 35, 1 (2011), 28--42.
[22]
Otto Ortmann. 1929. The physiological mechanics of piano technique: An experimental study of the nature of muscular action as used in piano playing and of the effects thereof upon the piano key and the piano tone. (1929).
[23]
Eric Sheffield and Michael Gurevich. 2015. Distributed Mechanical Actuation of Percussion Instruments. In Proceedings of the international conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. 11--15.
[24]
Patrick Shove and Bruno H Repp. 1995. Musical motion and performance: theoretical and empirical perspectives. The practice of performance: Studies in musical interpretation (1995), 55--83.
[25]
Marc R Thompson and Geoff Luck. 2012. Exploring relationships between pianists' body movements, their expressive intentions, and structural elements of the music. Musicae Scientiae 16, 1 (2012), 19--40.
[26]
Kai Tuuri, Jaana Parviainen, and Antti Pirhonen. 2017. Who Controls Who? Embodied Control Within Human-Technology Choreographies. Interacting with Computers (2017).
[27]
Kai Tuuri, Antti Pirhonen, and Eve Hoggan. 2009. Some severe deficiencies of the input-output HCI-paradigm and their influence on practical design. Designing Beyond the Product (2009).
[28]
Marcelo M Wanderley and Philippe Depalle. 2004. Gestural control of sound synthesis. Proc. IEEE 92, 4 (2004), 632--644.
[29]
Nicholas Ward, Kedzie Penfield, Sile O'Modhrain, and R Benjamin Knapp. 2008. A Study of Two Thereminists: Towards Movement Informed Instrument Design. In NIME. 117--121.
[30]
Victor Zappi and Andrew McPherson. 2014. Dimensionality and Appropriation in Digital Musical Instrument Design. In NIME. 455--460.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Entangling Entanglement: A Diffractive Dialogue on HCI and Musical InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642171(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)FM Tone Transfer with Envelope LearningProceedings of the 18th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3616195.3616196(116-123)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Sound -> Object -> Gesture: Physical Affordances of Virtual MaterialsProceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3561212.3561230(59-66)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Rich gesture, reduced control: the influence of constrained mappings on performance technique

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MOCO '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
      June 2017
      206 pages
      ISBN:9781450352093
      DOI:10.1145/3077981
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      In-Cooperation

      • University of Surrey

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 28 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. constraints
      2. digital musical instruments
      3. materials
      4. musical gesture
      5. percussion
      6. physicality dimensionality
      7. projection
      8. richness

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      MOCO '17
      MOCO '17: 4th International Conference on Movement Computing
      June 28 - 30, 2017
      London, United Kingdom

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 185 submissions, 46%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 26 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Entangling Entanglement: A Diffractive Dialogue on HCI and Musical InteractionsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642171(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2023)FM Tone Transfer with Envelope LearningProceedings of the 18th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3616195.3616196(116-123)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2023
      • (2022)Sound -> Object -> Gesture: Physical Affordances of Virtual MaterialsProceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3561212.3561230(59-66)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2022
      • (2021)A TMR Angle Sensor for Gesture Acquisition and Disambiguation on the Electric GuitarProceedings of the 16th International Audio Mostly Conference10.1145/3478384.3478427(256-263)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2021
      • (2021)Embodied Cognition in Performers of Large Acoustic Instruments as a Method of Designing New Large Digital Musical InstrumentsPerception, Representations, Image, Sound, Music10.1007/978-3-030-70210-6_37(577-590)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2021
      • (2020)Performer Experience on a Continuous Keyboard InstrumentComputer Music Journal10.1162/comj_a_0056544:2-3(69-91)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2020
      • (2020)Modeling a Musician Performing on a Digital Musical Instrument as a Communications ChannelExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382841(1-7)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
      • (2020)Idiomatic Patterns and Aesthetic Influence in Computer Music LanguagesOrganised Sound10.1017/S135577181900046325:1(53-63)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2020
      • (2019)Bricolage in a hybrid digital lutherie contextProceedings of the 14th International Audio Mostly Conference: A Journey in Sound10.1145/3356590.3356604(82-89)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2019
      • (2018)Effect of Instrument Structure Alterations on Violin PerformanceFrontiers in Psychology10.3389/fpsyg.2018.024369Online publication date: 6-Dec-2018
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media