Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3291078.3291101acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceelConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring Chinese Engineering Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Plagiarism

Published: 05 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

This article reports on a disciplinary study of Chinese university students' perceptions of and attitudes toward plagiarism in the context of Chinese educational background. A sample of 119 engineering undergraduates rated their (dis)agreement with 26 items using a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative and quantitative analyses revealed that Chinese engineering students tended to hold a much stronger stance against plagiarism than their foreign counterparts did. They were inclined to resort to external factors to clarify their perceptions to elements that aggravate plagiarism, rather than to internal factors such as subjective inclination, and the perceptions of plagiarism. Due to insufficient knowledge of and training on plagiarism, they were inclined to justify junior students' original and soft plagiarism, and held a weaker stance against severity and penalty for plagiarism.

References

[1]
Bowers, W. J. 1964. Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research.
[2]
Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. 2006. Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. J. Second Lang. Writ. 15, 2 (Jun. 2006), 102--117.
[3]
Chandrasegaran, A. 2000. Cultures in contact in academic writing: Students' perceptions of plagiarism. Asian J. Engl. Lang. Teach. 10, 91--113.
[4]
Pennycook, A. 1996. Borrowing others' words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quart. 30, 2 (Summer 1996), 201--230.
[5]
Shi, L. 2010. Textual appropriation and citing behaviors of university undergraduates. Appl. Linguist. 31, 1 (Feb. 2010), 1--24.
[6]
Valentine, K. 2006. Plagiarism as literacy practice: Recognizing and rethinking ethical binaries. Coll. Compos. Commun. 58, 1 (Sept. 2006), 89--109. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20456924.
[7]
Gibaldi, J. 2003. MLA handbook for writers of research papers. New York: Modern Language Society of America.
[8]
Bretag, T., and Mahmud, S. 2009. Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? J. Acad. Ethics, 7, 3 (Sept. 2009), 193--205.
[9]
Walker, J. 1998. Student plagiarism in universities: What are we doing about it? High. Educ. Res. Dev. 17, 1, 89--106.
[10]
Flowerdew, J., & Li, Y. 2007. Language re-use among Chinese apprentice scientists writing for publication. Appl. Linguist. 28, 3 (Sept. 2007), 440--465.
[11]
Rinnert, C., & Kobayashi, H. 2005. Borrowing words and ideas: Insights from Japanese L1 writers. J. Asian Pac. Commun. 15, 1 (May 2005), 15--29.
[12]
Selwyn, N. 2008. "Not necessarily a bad thing ...": A study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assess. Eval. High. Edu. 33, 5 (Sept. 2008), 465--479.
[13]
Sun, Y-C. 2009. Using a two-tier test in examining Taiwan graduate students' perspectives on paraphrasing strategies. Asia Pac. Edu. Rev. 10, 3 (Sept. 2009), 399--408.
[14]
Wheeler, G. 2009. Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? J. Sec. Lang. Writ. 18, 1 (Mar. 2009), 17--29.
[15]
Flint, A., Clegg, S., and Macdonald, R. 2006. Exploring staff perceptions of student plagiarism. J. Furth. High. Edu. 30, 2, 145--156.
[16]
Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilic-Zulle, L., and Petrovecki, M. 2010. Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croat. Med. J. 51, 3 (Jun. 2010), 195--201.
[17]
Howard, S. J., Ehrich, J. F., and Walton, R. 2014. Measuring students' perceptions of plagiarism: Modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale. J. Appl. Meas. 15, 4 (Winter 2014), 372--393.
[18]
Hayes, N. and Introna, L. 2005. Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics and Behavior, 15, 3, 213--231.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The plagiarism pandemic: Inspection of academic dishonesty during the COVID-19 outbreak using originality softwareEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11967-329:3(3279-3299)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023

Index Terms

  1. Measuring Chinese Engineering Students' Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward Plagiarism

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEEL '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Education and E-Learning
    November 2018
    224 pages
    ISBN:9781450365772
    DOI:10.1145/3291078
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 05 November 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Chinese engineering students
    2. attitude
    3. disciplinary intertextual practice
    4. plagiarism

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEEL 2018

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)The plagiarism pandemic: Inspection of academic dishonesty during the COVID-19 outbreak using originality softwareEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-023-11967-329:3(3279-3299)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2023

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media