Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3387903.3389317acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The Power of String Solving: Simplicity of Comparison

Published: 07 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The increased interest in string solving in the recent years has made it very hard to identify the right tool to address a particular user's purpose. Firstly, there is a multitude of string solving, each addressing essentially some subset of the general problem. Generally, the addressed fragments are relevant and well motivated, but the lack of comparisons between the existing tools on an equal set of benchmarks, cannot go unnoticed, especially as a common framework to compare solvers seems to be missing. In this paper we gather a set of relevant benchmarks and introduce our new benchmarking framework ZaligVinder to address this purpose.

References

[1]
[n.d.]. IBM AppScan Source web site. https://www.ibm.com/dk-da/security/application-security/appscan.
[2]
P. A. Abdulla, M. F.i Atig, Y. Chen, B. P. Diep, L. Holík, A. Rezine, and P. Rümmer. 2018. Trau: SMT solver for string constraints. In Proc. FMCAD. IEEE, 1--5.
[3]
P. A. Abdulla, M. F. Atig, Y. Chen, L. Holík, A. Rezine, P. Rümmer, and J. Stenman. 2014. String constraints for verification. In Proc. CAV. Springer, 150--166.
[4]
P. A. Abdulla, M. F. Atig, Y. Chen, L. Holík, A. Rezine, P. Rümmer, and J. Stenman. 2015. Norn: An SMT Solver for String Constraints. In Proc. CAV, Part 1 (LNCS), Vol. 9206. 462--469.
[5]
T. Ball and J. Daniel. 2014. Deconstructing Dynamic Symbolic Execution. Proc. Marktoberdorf Summer School on Dependable Software Systems Engineering (2014).
[6]
C. W. Barrett, C. L. Conway, M. Deters, L. Hadarean, D. Jovanovic, T. King, A. Reynolds, and C. Tinelli. 2011. CVC4. In Proc. CAV (LNCS), Vol. 6806. 171--177.
[7]
Murphy Berzish, Vijay Ganesh, and Yunhui Zheng. 2017. Z3str3: A string solver with theory-aware heuristics. In Proc. FMCAD. 55--59.
[8]
D. Blotsky, F. Mora, M. Berzish, Y. Zheng, I. Kabir, and V. Ganesh. 2018. Stringfuzz: A fuzzer for string solvers. In Proc. CAV. Springer, 45--51.
[9]
T. Brennan, N. Tsiskaridze, N. Rosner, A.i Aydin, and T. Bultan. 2017. Constraint normalization and parameterized caching for quantitative program analysis. In Proc. 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 535--546.
[10]
J. D. Day, T. Ehlers, M. Kulczynski, F. Manea, D. Nowotka, and D. B. Poulsen. 2019. On Solving Word Equations Using SAT. In Proc. RP (LNCS), Vol. 11674. Springer, 93--106.
[11]
J. D. Day, M. Kulczynski, F. Manea, D. Nowotka, and D. B Poulsen. 2020. Rule-based Word Equation Solving. In Proc. FormaliSE. IEEE.
[12]
J. D. Day, V.Ganesh, P. He, F. Manea, and D. Nowotka. 2018. The Satisfiability of Word Equations: Decidable and Undecidable Theories. In Proc. RP (LNCS), Vol. 11123. 15--29.
[13]
S. Kausler and E. Sherman. 2014. Evaluation of string constraint solvers in the context of symbolic execution. In Proc. ASE - IEEE/ACM. ACM, 259--270.
[14]
T. Liang, A. Reynolds, N. Tsiskaridze, C. Tinelli, C. Barrett, and M. Deters. 2016. An efficient SMT solver for string constraints. Formal Methods in System Design 48, 3 (2016), 206--234.
[15]
L. Luu, S. Shinde, P. Saxena, and B. Demsky. 2014. A model counter for constraints over unbounded strings. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 49. ACM, 565--576.
[16]
G. S. Makanin. 1977. The problem of solvability of equations in a free semigroup. Sbornik: Mathematics 32, 2 (1977), 129--198.
[17]
A. Reynolds, M. Woo, C. Barrett, D. Brumley, T. Liang, and C. Tinelli. 2017. Scaling up DPLL (T) string solvers using context-dependent simplification. In Proc. CAV. Springer, 453--474.
[18]
P. Saxena, D. Akhawe, S. Hanna, F. Mao, S. McCamant, and D. Song. [n.d.]. Kaluza web site. webblaze.cs.berkeley.edu/2010/kaluza/. Accessed: 2020-01-01.
[19]
P. Saxena, D. Akhawe, S. Hanna, F. Mao, S. McCamant, and D. Song. 2010. A Symbolic Execution Framework for JavaScript. In Proc. 31st S&P. 513--528.
[20]
T. Tateishi, M. Pistoia, and O. Tripp. 2013. Path-and index-sensitive string analysis based on monadic second-order logic. TOSEM 22, 4 (2013), 33.
[21]
J. Thomé, L. K. Shar, D. Bianculli, and L. Briand. 2018. An integrated approach for effective injection vulnerability analysis of web applications through security slicing and hybrid constraint solving. IEEE TSE (2018).
[22]
F. Yu, M. Alkhalaf, and T. Bultan. 2010. STRANGER: An Automata-based String Analysis Tool for PHP. In Proc. TACAS (Paphos, Cyprus) (TACAS'10). Springer, 154--157.
[23]
Y. Zheng, V. Ganesh, S. Subramanian, O. Tripp, M. Berzish, J. Dolby, and X.a Zhang. 2017. Z3str2: an efficient solver for strings, regular expressions, and length constraints. Formal Methods in System Design 50, 2--3 (2017), 249--288.
[24]
Y. Zheng, X. Zhang, and V. Ganesh. 2013. Z3-str: A z3-based string solver for web application analysis. In Proceedings of the 2013 9th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. ACM, 114--124.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AST '20: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 1st International Conference on Automation of Software Test
October 2020
122 pages
ISBN:9781450379571
DOI:10.1145/3387903
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 October 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

AST '20
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Verified Verifying: SMT-LIB for Strings in IsabelleImplementation and Application of Automata10.1007/978-3-031-40247-0_15(206-217)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2023
  • (2022)Solving String Theories Involving Regular Membership Predicates Using SATModel Checking Software10.1007/978-3-031-15077-7_8(134-151)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
  • (2021)A Survey on String Constraint SolvingACM Computing Surveys10.1145/348419855:1(1-38)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Data-driven design and evaluation of SMT meta-solving strategiesProceedings of the 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering10.1109/ASE51524.2021.9678881(179-190)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Z3str4: A Multi-armed String SolverFormal Methods10.1007/978-3-030-90870-6_21(389-406)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2021
  • (2021)String Theories Involving Regular Membership Predicates: From Practice to Theory and BackCombinatorics on Words10.1007/978-3-030-85088-3_5(50-64)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2021
  • (2021)An SMT Solver for Regular Expressions and Linear Arithmetic over String LengthComputer Aided Verification10.1007/978-3-030-81688-9_14(289-312)Online publication date: 15-Jul-2021
  • (2021)ZaligVinder: A generic test framework for string solversJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.240035:4Online publication date: 28-Oct-2021
  • (2020)Rule-based Word Equation SolvingProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering10.1145/3372020.3391556(87-97)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media