Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3491204.3527493acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

FADE: Towards Flexible and Adaptive Distance Estimation Considering Obstacles: Vision Paper

Published: 19 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In the last decades, especially intensified by the pandemic situation in which many people stay at home and order goods online, the need for efficient logistics systems has increased significantly. Hence, the performance of optimization techniques for logistic processes are becoming more and more important. These techniques often require estimates about distances to customers and facilities where operators have to choose between exact results or short computation times. In this vision paper, we propose an approach for Flexible and Adaptive Distance Estimation (FADE). The central idea is to abstract map knowledge into a less complex graph to trade off between computation time and result accuracy. We propose to further apply concepts from self-aware computing in order to support the dynamic adaptation to individual goals.

References

[1]
2021. E-commerce in the time of COVID-19. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/ policy-responses/e-commerce-in-the-time-of-covid-19--3a2b78e8. [Online; accessed 12. Jan. 2022].
[2]
2022. How e-commerce share of retail soared across the globe: A look at eight countries. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/coronavirus-leadingthrough-the-crisis/charting-the-path-to-the-next-normal/how-e-commerceshare-of-retail-soared-across-the-globe-a-look-at-eight-countries. [Online; accessed 12. Jan. 2022].
[3]
M. Hakan Akyüz. 2018. Discretization Based Heuristics for the Capacitated Multi-Facility Weber Problem with Convex Polyhedral Barriers. An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) 8, 1 (2018), 26--42. https://doi.org/10.11121/ijocta.01.2018.00388
[4]
Ethem Alpaydin. Kuban Altinel, and Necati Aras. 1996. Parametric Distance Functions vs. Nonparametric Neural Networks for Estimating Road Travel Distances. European Journal of Operational Research 93, 2 (Sept. 1996), 230--243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377--2217(96)00045--8
[5]
Luciano Blasi, Egidio D'Amato, Massimiliano Mattei, and Immacolata Notaro. 2020. Path Planning and Real-Time Collision Avoidance Based on the Essential Visibility Graph. Applied Sciences 10, 16 (Jan. 2020), 5613. https://doi.org/10. 3390/app10165613
[6]
Jack Brimberg, John H. Walker, and Robert F. Love. 2007. Estimation of Travel Distances with the Weighted p Norm: Some Empirical Results. Journal of Transport Geography 15, 1 (Jan. 2007), 62--72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo. 2006.01.004
[7]
Derya Celik Turkoglu and Mujde Erol Genevois. 2020. A comparative survey of service facility location problems. Annals of Operations Research 292, 1 (2020), 399--468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03385-x
[8]
Thomas H Cormen, Charles E Leiserson, Ronald L Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press.
[9]
Kalyanmoy Deb, Amrit Pratap, Sameer Agarwal, and TAMT Meyarivan. 2002. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 2 (2002), 182--197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235. 996017
[10]
Marco Dorigo, Vittorio Maniezzo, and Alberto Colorni. 1996. Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B 26, 1 (1996), 29--41. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436
[11]
Robert Geisberger, Peter Sanders, Dominik Schultes, and Daniel Delling. 2008. Contraction Hierarchies: Faster and Simpler Hierarchical Routing in Road Networks. In Experimental Algorithms, Catherine C. McGeoch (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 319--333.
[12]
Peter Hart, Nils Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. 1968. A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths. IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4, 2 (1968), 100--107. https://doi.org/10.1109/tssc.1968. 300136
[13]
Kazuyoshi Hidaka and Hiroyuki Okano. 2003. An approximation algorithm for a large-scale facility location problem. Algorithmica 35, 3 (2003), 216--224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-002-0996-z
[14]
John H. Holland. 1992. Genetic Algorithms. Scientific American 267, 1 (1992), 66--73.
[15]
J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 4. 1942--1948 vol.4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
[16]
Martin Kords. 2021. Transportleistung im Straßengüterverkehr 2019 | Statista. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/2979/umfrage/entwicklung-dertransportleistung-des-strassengueterverkehrs. [Online; acc. 3. Feb. 2021].
[17]
Samuel Kounev, Peter Lewis, Kirstie L Bellman, Nelly Bencomo, Javier Camara, Ada Diaconescu, Lukas Esterle, Kurt Geihs, Holger Giese, Sebastian Götz, et al. 2017. The Notion of Self-aware Computing. In Self-Aware Computing Systems. Springer, 3--16.
[18]
Amgad Madkour, Walid G. Aref, Faizan Ur Rehman, Mohamed Abdur Rahman, and Saleh Basalamah. 2017. A Survey of Shortest-Path Algorithms. arXiv:1705.02044 [cs.DS]
[19]
Ricardo Mesquita and Pedro D Gaspar. 2020. A Path Planning Optimization Algorithm Based on Particle Swarm Optimization for UAVs for Bird Monitoring and Repelling--Simulation Results. In 2020 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA). IEEE, 1144--1148.
[20]
Mohammad Mahdi Nasiri, Vahid Mahmoodian, Ali Rahbari, and Shabnam Farahmand. 2018. A modified genetic algorithm for the capacitated competitive facility location problem with the partial demand satisfaction. Computers & Industrial Engineering 124 (2018), 435--448.
[21]
Ryan A. Rossi and Nesreen K. Ahmed. 2015. The Network Data Repository with Interactive Graph Analytics and Visualization. In AAAI. https: //networkrepository.com
[22]
Rizwan Shahid, Stefania Bertazzon, Merril L. Knudtson, and William A. Ghali. 2009. Comparison of Distance Measures in Spatial Analytical Modeling for Health Service Planning. BMC Health Services Research 9, 1 (Nov. 2009), 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472--6963--9--200
[23]
Vedat Verter. 2011. Uncapacitated and Capacitated Facility Location Problems. In Foundations of Location Analysis, H. A. Eiselt and Vladimir Marianov (Eds.). Springer US, New York, NY, 25--37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--1--4419--7572-0_2
[24]
Cristian Zambrano-Vega, Génesis Acosta, Jasmin Loor, Byron Suárez, Carla Jaramillo, and Byron Oviedo. 2019. A Sales Route Optimization Mobile Application Applying a Genetic Algorithm and the Google Maps Navigation System. In International Conference on Information Technology & Systems. Springer, 517--527.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICPE '22: Companion of the 2022 ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering
July 2022
166 pages
ISBN:9781450391597
DOI:10.1145/3491204
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. distance estimation
  2. logistics
  3. optimization
  4. self-awareness

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

  • Bayerisches Verbundforschungsprogramm (BayVFP) ? Digitalisierung

Conference

ICPE '22

Acceptance Rates

ICPE '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 14 of 58 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 252 of 851 submissions, 30%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 69
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media