research-article

Collaborative Online Learning with VR Video: Roles of Collaborative Tools and Shared Video Control

Authors:

Svetlana YaroshAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 713, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581395

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) has a noteworthy educational potential by providing immersive and collaborative environments. As an alternative but cost-effective way of delivering realistic environments in VR, using 360-degree videos in immersive VR (VR videos) received more attention. Although many studies reported positive learning experiences with VR videos, little is known about how collaborative learning performs on VR video viewing systems. In this study, we implemented two collaborative VR video viewing modes based on the way of group video control, synchronized or shared (Sync mode) and non-synchronized or individual (Non-sync mode) video control, against a conventional VR video viewing setting (Basic mode). We conducted a within-subject study (N = 54) in a lab-simulated remote learning environment. Our results show that collaborative VR video modes (Sync and Non-sync mode) improve users’ learning experiences and collaboration quality, especially with shared video control. Our findings provide directions for designing and employing collaborative VR video tools in online learning environments.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3544548.3581395-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
32.47 MB

MP4 File (3544548.3581395-video-figure.mp4)

Video Figure

Download
160.70 MB

References

[1]

Rahman Abidin, Nunuk Suryani, 2020. Students’ Perceptions of 360 Degree Virtual Tour-Based Historical Learning About the Cultural Heritage Area of the Kapitan and Al-Munawar Villages in Palembang City. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management 7, 3 (2020), 105–112.

[2]

Salsabeel FM Alfalah, Jannat FM Falah, Tasneem Alfalah, Mutasem Elfalah, Nadia Muhaidat, and Orwa Falah. 2019. A comparative study between a virtual reality heart anatomy system and traditional medical teaching modalities. Virtual Reality 23, 3 (2019), 229–234.

Digital Library

[3]

Lorin W Anderson and David R Krathwohl. 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

[4]

Dan Archer and Katharina Finger. 2018. Walking in another’s virtual shoes: Do 360-degree video news stories generate empathy in viewers?(2018).

[5]

Penelope Atsikpasi and Emmanuel Fokides. 2021. A scoping review of the educational uses of 6DoF HMDs. Virtual Reality (2021), 1–18.

[6]

Jeremy N Bailenson, Kim Swinth, Crystal Hoyt, Susan Persky, Alex Dimov, and Jim Blascovich. 2005. The independent and interactive effects of embodied-agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence 14, 4 (2005), 379–393.

Digital Library

[7]

K Louise Barriball and Alison While. 1993. Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of advanced nursing 18, 10 (1993), 328–335.

[8]

Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Tom Rodden, and James Pycock. 2001. Collaborative virtual environments. Commun. ACM 44, 7 (2001), 79–85.

Digital Library

[9]

Abbie Brown and Tim Green. 2016. Virtual reality: Low-cost tools and resources for the classroom. TechTrends 60, 5 (2016), 517–519.

[10]

Barry Brown, Stuart Reeves, and Scott Sherwood. 2011. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1657–1666.

Digital Library

[11]

Jonathan J Cadiz, Anand Balachandran, Elizabeth Sanocki, Anoop Gupta, Jonathan Grudin, and Gavin Jancke. 2000. Distance learning through distributed collaborative video viewing. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. 135–144.

Digital Library

[12]

Paul Chandler and John Sweller. 1992. The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62, 2 (1992), 233–246.

[13]

Chen-Wei Chang, Shih-Ching Yeh, Mengtong Li, and Eason Yao. 2019. The introduction of a novel virtual reality training system for gynecology learning and its user experience research. IEEE Access 7(2019), 43637–43653.

[14]

David Checa and Andres Bustillo. 2020. Advantages and limits of virtual reality in learning processes: Briviesca in the fifteenth century. Virtual Reality 24, 1 (2020), 151–161.

Digital Library

[15]

Gabriele Cierniak, Katharina Scheiter, and Peter Gerjets. 2009. Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?Computers in Human Behavior 25, 2 (2009), 315–324.

Digital Library

[16]

Viviane Clay, Peter König, and Sabine Koenig. 2019. Eye tracking in virtual reality. Journal of eye movement research 12, 1 (2019).

[17]

Susan Copley Cobb. 2009. Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective.Journal of Interactive Online Learning 8, 3 (2009).

[18]

J Cohen. 1992. A power primer Psychological Bulletin 112: 155–159. IE and Dyadic Adjustment 1 (1992).

[19]

Zoom Video Communications. 2011. Zoom. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://zoom.us/

[20]

Maxime Cordeil, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Bireswar Laha, Kim Marriott, and Bruce H Thomas. 2016. Immersive collaborative analysis of network connectivity: CAVE-style or head-mounted display?IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 23, 1(2016), 441–450.

[21]

Camila Cortez, Miguel Nussbaum, Gerardo Woywood, and Ricardo Aravena. 2009. Learning to collaborate by collaborating: a face-to-face collaborative activity for measuring and learning basics about teamwork 1. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 25, 2 (2009), 126–142.

[22]

Nicola Dell, Vidya Vaidyanathan, Indrani Medhi, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. " Yours is better!" participant response bias in HCI. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1321–1330.

Digital Library

[23]

Tobias Drey, Patrick Albus, Simon der Kinderen, Maximilian Milo, Thilo Segschneider, Linda Chanzab, Michael Rietzler, Tina Seufert, and Enrico Rukzio. 2022. Towards Collaborative Learning in Virtual Reality: A Comparison of Co-Located Symmetric and Asymmetric Pair-Learning. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19.

[24]

John Dutra, James F Gibbons, Robert L Pannoni, Michael J Sipusic, Randall B Smith, and William R Sutherland. 1999. Virtual Collaborative Learning: A Comparison between Face-to-Face Tutored Video Instruction (TVI) and Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI).

[25]

Noureddine Elmqaddem. 2019. Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Myth or reality?International journal of emerging technologies in learning 14, 3(2019).

[26]

Marie Evens, Michaël Empsen, and Wouter Hustinx. 2022. A literature review on 360-degree video as an educational tool: towards design guidelines. Journal of Computers in Education(2022), 1–51.

[27]

Jingchao Fang, Yanhao Wang, Chi-Lan Yang, Ching Liu, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2022. Understanding the Effects of Structured Note-taking Systems for Video-based Learners in Individual and Social Learning Contexts. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, GROUP(2022), 1–21.

Digital Library

[28]

Zhangjie Fu, Jiashuang Xu, Zhuangdi Zhu, Alex X Liu, and Xingming Sun. 2018. Writing in the air with WiFi signals for virtual reality devices. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 2 (2018), 473–484.

Digital Library

[29]

Marco Furini. 2018. On introducing timed tag-clouds in video lectures indexing. Multimedia Tools and Applications 77, 1 (2018), 967–984.

Digital Library

[30]

Susan R Fussell, Robert E Kraut, and Jane Siegel. 2000. Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 21–30.

Digital Library

[31]

Fani Galatsopoulou, Clio Kenterelidou, Rigas Kotsakis, and Maria Matsiola. 2022. Examining Students’ Perceptions towards Video-Based and Video-Assisted Active Learning Scenarios in Journalism and Communication Courses. Education Sciences 12, 2 (2022), 74.

[32]

Ronak Dipakkumar Gandhi and Dipam S Patel. 2018. Virtual reality–opportunities and challenges. Virtual Reality 5, 01 (2018).

[33]

Michail Giannakos, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, Marco Ronchetti, Peter Szegedi, and Stephanie Teasley. 2014. Video-based learning and open online courses. (2014).

[34]

James F Gibbons, WR Kincheloe, and KS Down. 1977. Tutored videotape instruction: a new use of electronics media in education. Science 195, 4283 (1977), 1139–1146.

[35]

Barney G Glaser. 1992. Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Sociology press.

[36]

Bernadette Gold and Julian Windscheid. 2020. Observing 360-degree classroom videos–Effects of video type on presence, emotions, workload, classroom observations, and ratings of teaching quality. Computers & Education 156 (2020), 103960.

[37]

R Goldman. 2006. Orion, an Online Collaborative Digital Video Data Analysis Tool: Changing Our Perspectives as an Interpretive Community. Video Research in the Learning Sciences, R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, and SJ Derry, eds (2006), 507–520.

[38]

Google. 2006. Google Slides. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://slides.google.com

[39]

Google. 2015. Google AI. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://ai.google/

[40]

Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 111–120.

Digital Library

[41]

Scott W Greenwald, Zhangyuan Wang, Markus Funk, and Pattie Maes. 2017. Investigating social presence and communication with embodied avatars in room-scale virtual reality. In International Conference on Immersive Learning. Springer, 75–90.

[42]

William A Hamilton, Nic Lupfer, Nicolas Botello, Tyler Tesch, Alex Stacy, Jeremy Merrill, Blake Williford, Frank R Bentley, and Andruid Kerne. 2018. Collaborative live media curation: Shared context for participation in online learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.

Digital Library

[43]

Michael A Harvey and Carl N Sipprelle. 1976. Demand characteristic effects on the subtle and obvious subscales of the MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment 40, 5 (1976), 539–544.

[44]

Sean Hauze, Helina Hoyt, James Marshall, James Frazee, and Philip Greiner. 2018. An evaluation of nursing student motivation to learn through holographic mixed reality simulation. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE). IEEE, 1058–1063.

[45]

Clyde Hendrick. 1990. Replications, strict replications, and conceptual replications: are they important?Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 5, 4 (1990), 41.

[46]

Paula Hodgson, Vivian WY Lee, Johnson Chan, Agnes Fong, Cindi SY Tang, Leo Chan, and Cathy Wong. 2019. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) in higher education: Development and implementation. In Augmented reality and virtual reality. Springer, 161–173.

[47]

Kasper Hornbæk, Søren S Sander, Javier Andrés Bargas-Avila, and Jakob Grue Simonsen. 2014. Is once enough? On the extent and content of replications in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3523–3532.

Digital Library

[48]

Carol Hostetter. 2013. Community matters: Social presence and learning outcomes.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 13, 1 (2013), 77–86.

[49]

Amanda Hurlbut. 2021. Videos or Zoom? Using a Flipped Classroom Approach to Facilitate PST Online Learning. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 175–184.

[50]

Wu-Yuin Hwang and Shih-Shin Hu. 2013. Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education 62 (2013), 308–319.

[51]

Santiago González Izard, Juan A Juanes, Francisco J García Peñalvo, Jesús Mª Estella, Mª Ledesma, and Pablo Ruisoto. 2018. Virtual reality as an educational and training tool for medicine. Journal of medical systems 42, 3 (2018), 1–5.

Digital Library

[52]

Lasse Jensen and Flemming Konradsen. 2018. A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies 23, 4 (2018), 1515–1529.

Digital Library

[53]

Qiao Jin, Yu Liu, Svetlana Yarosh, Bo Han, and Feng Qian. 2022. How Will VR Enter University Classrooms? Multi-stakeholders Investigation of VR in Higher Education. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17.

Digital Library

[54]

Qiao Jin, Yu Liu, Ye Yuan, Lana Yarosh, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2020. VWorld: an immersive VR system for learning programming. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference: Extended Abstracts. 235–240.

Digital Library

[55]

Pekka Kallioniemi, Tuuli Keskinen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Markku Turunen, Jussi Karhu, and Kimmo Ronkainen. 2017. Effect of Gender on Immersion in Collaborative IODV Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

[56]

Sam Kavanagh, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Burkhard Wuensche, and Beryl Plimmer. 2017. A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education 10, 2 (2017), 85–119.

[57]

David S Kirk and Danaë Stanton Fraser. 2017. The effects of remote gesturing on distance instruction. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!Routledge, 301–310.

[58]

Paul A Kirschner, John Sweller, Femke Kirschner, Jimmy Zambrano R, 2018. From cognitive load theory to collaborative cognitive load theory. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 13, 2(2018), 213–233.

[59]

Karel Kreijns, Paul A Kirschner, Wim Jochems, and Hans Van Buuren. 2011. Measuring perceived social presence in distributed learning groups. Education and Information Technologies 16, 4 (2011), 365–381.

Digital Library

[60]

Kartikaeya Kumar, Lev Poretski, Jiannan Li, and Anthony Tang. 2022. Tourgether360: Collaborative Exploration of 360° Videos Using Pseudo-Spatial Navigation. 6, CSCW2 (2022).

Digital Library

[61]

Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences 31 (2012), 486–490.

[62]

Joseph LaViola. 2000. MSVT: A virtual reality-based multimodal scientific visualization tool. In Proceedings of the third IASTED international conference on computer graphics and imaging. 1–7.

[63]

Gun A Lee, Theophilus Teo, Seungwon Kim, and Mark Billinghurst. 2018. A user study on mr remote collaboration using live 360 video. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, 153–164.

[64]

Nan Li, Himanshu Verma, Afroditi Skevi, Guillaume Zufferey, Jan Blom, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2014. Watching MOOCs together: investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education 35, 2 (2014), 217–233.

[65]

Nan Li, Himanshu Verma, Afroditi Skevi, Guillaume Zufferey, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2014. MOOC learning in spontaneous study groups: Does synchronously watching videos make a difference?Technical Report. PAU Education.

[66]

Chin-Wen Liao, Ching-Huei Chen, and Sie-Jhih Shih. 2019. The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education 133 (2019), 43–55.

Digital Library

[67]

Ching Liu, Juho Kim, and Hao-Chuan Wang. 2018. ConceptScape: Collaborative concept mapping for video learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[68]

David M Markowitz, Rob Laha, Brian P Perone, Roy D Pea, and Jeremy N Bailenson. 2018. Immersive virtual reality field trips facilitate learning about climate change. Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018), 2364.

[69]

Benjy Marks and Jacqueline Thomas. 2022. Adoption of virtual reality technology in higher education: An evaluation of five teaching semesters in a purpose-designed laboratory. Education and information technologies 27, 1 (2022), 1287–1305.

[70]

Orbitian Media. 2017. One day in Granada: 360° Virtual Tour with Voice Over. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_13l5A7lc2g&t=2s

[71]

Orbitian Media. 2017. One day in Porto: 360° Virtual Tour with Voice Over. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vxBasS20MDs&t=40s

[72]

Orbitian Media. 2017. One day in Seville: 360° Virtual Tour with Voice Over. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwO7PlBOFjk&t=10s

[73]

Orbitian Media. 2023. One day in: 360° travel videos. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHiCdB8YTO76Gv843e8rdcza-FJbYCYSj

[74]

Shahid Minhas, Tasaddaq Hussain, Abdul Ghani, Kiran Sajid, and L Pakistan. 2021. Exploring students online learning: A study of zoom application. Gazi University Journal of Science 34, 2 (2021), 171–178.

[75]

Rachel Mintz, Shai Litvak, and Yoav Yair. 2001. 3D-virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 20, 3(2001), 293–305.

[76]

Toni-Jan Keith Palma Monserrat, Shengdong Zhao, Kevin McGee, and Anshul Vikram Pandey. 2013. NoteVideo: Facilitating Navigation of Blackboard-Style Lecture Videos. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

[77]

Roxana Moreno and Richard E Mayer. 1999. Visual presentations in multimedia learning: Conditions that overload visual working memory. In International conference on advances in visual information systems. Springer, 798–805.

[78]

Michael Muller. 2014. Curiosity, creativity, and surprise as analytic tools: Grounded theory method. In Ways of Knowing in HCI. Springer, 25–48.

[79]

Cuong Nguyen, Stephen DiVerdi, Aaron Hertzmann, and Feng Liu. 2017. CollaVR: collaborative in-headset review for VR video. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 267–277.

Digital Library

[80]

Heather L O’Brien and Elaine G Toms. 2008. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (2008), 938–955.

[81]

Elizaveta Osipovskaya and Elena Burdovskaya. 2019. Presentation Software Tools in Higher Educational Setting. ARPHA Proceedings 1(2019), 1487.

[82]

Elinor Ostrom. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Perspectives on Politics 6, 4 (2008), 828–829.

[83]

Murat Oztok and Clare Brett. 2011. Social presence and online learning: A review of the research. (2011).

[84]

Karoliina Paalimäki-Paakki, Mari Virtanen, Anja Henner, MT Nieminen, and M Kääriäinen. 2021. Patients’, radiographers’ and radiography students’ experiences of 360° virtual counselling environment for the coronary computed tomography angiography: A qualitative study. Radiography 27, 2 (2021), 381–388.

[85]

Debajyoti Pal and Syamal Patra. 2021. University students’ perception of video-based learning in times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF perspective. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 37, 10(2021), 903–921.

[86]

Dhaval Parmar, Joseph Isaac, Sabarish V Babu, Nikeetha D’Souza, Alison E Leonard, Sophie Jörg, Kara Gundersen, and Shaundra B Daily. 2016. Programming moves: Design and evaluation of applying embodied interaction in virtual environments to enhance computational thinking in middle school students. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 131–140.

[87]

Roy Pea and Robb Lindgren. 2008. Video collaboratories for research and education: An analysis of collaboration design patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1, 4 (2008), 235–247.

Digital Library

[88]

Gustav Bøg Petersen, Aske Mottelson, and Guido Makransky. 2021. Pedagogical agents in educational vr: An in the wild study. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[89]

Photon. 2013. Photon Engine: Multiplayer Game Development. Retrieved Feb 15, 2023 from https://www.photonengine.com

[90]

Catlin Pidel and Philipp Ackermann. 2020. Collaboration in virtual and augmented reality: a systematic overview. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Springer, 141–156.

Digital Library

[91]

Daniel Pimentel, Sri Kalyanaraman, Yu-Hao Lee, and Shiva Halan. 2021. Voices of the unsung: The role of social presence and interactivity in building empathy in 360 video. new media & society 23, 8 (2021), 2230–2254.

[92]

Johanna Pirker and Andreas Dengel. 2021. The Potential of 360-Degree Virtual Reality Videos and Real VR for Education-A Literature. (2021).

[93]

Yeshwanth Pulijala, Minhua Ma, Matt Pears, David Peebles, and Ashraf Ayoub. 2018. An innovative virtual reality training tool for orthognathic surgery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 47, 9(2018), 1199–1205.

[94]

M Radia, M Arunakirinathan, and D Sibley. 2018. A guide to eyes: ophthalmic simulators. The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 100, 4(2018), 169–171.

[95]

Rivu Radiah, Ville Mäkelä, Sarah Prange, Sarah Delgado Rodriguez, Robin Piening, Yumeng Zhou, Kay Köhle, Ken Pfeuffer, Yomna Abdelrahman, Matthias Hoppe, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2021. Remote VR Studies: A Framework for Running Virtual Reality Studies Remotely Via Participant-Owned HMDs. 28, 6 (2021).

[96]

Yitoshee Rahman, Sarker M Asish, Nicholas P Fisher, Ethan C Bruce, Arun K Kulshreshth, and Christoph W Borst. 2020. Exploring eye gaze visualization techniques for identifying distracted students in educational VR. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 868–877.

[97]

Maria Ranieri, Damiana Luzzi, Stefano Cuomo, and Isabella Bruni. 2022. If and how do 360° videos fit into education settings? Results from a scoping review of empirical research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning(2022).

[98]

Natasha Anne Rappa, Susan Ledger, Timothy Teo, Kok Wai Wong, Brad Power, and Bruce Hilliard. 2019. The use of eye tracking technology to explore learning and performance within virtual reality and mixed reality settings: a scoping review. Interactive Learning Environments(2019), 1–13.

[99]

Paul Resta and Thérèse Laferrière. 2007. Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational psychology review 19, 1 (2007), 65–83.

[100]

Vicente Román-Ibáñez, Francisco A Pujol-López, Higinio Mora-Mora, Maria Luisa Pertegal-Felices, and Antonio Jimeno-Morenilla. 2018. A low-cost immersive virtual reality system for teaching robotic manipulators programming. Sustainability 10, 4 (2018), 1102.

[101]

Daniel Roth, Jean-Luc Lugrin, Dmitri Galakhov, Arvid Hofmann, Gary Bente, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Arnulph Fuhrmann. 2016. Avatar realism and social interaction quality in virtual reality. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, 277–278.

[102]

Michael A Rupp, James Kozachuk, Jessica R Michaelis, Katy L Odette, Janan A Smither, and Daniel S McConnell. 2016. The effects of immersiveness and future VR expectations on subjec-tive-experiences during an educational 360 video. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, Vol. 60. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2108–2112.

[103]

Marija Sablić, Ana Mirosavljević, and Alma Škugor. 2021. Video-based learning (VBL)—past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 26, 4 (2021), 1061–1077.

[104]

David Saffo, Sara Di Bartolomeo, Caglar Yildirim, and Cody Dunne. 2021. Remote and Collaborative Virtual Reality Experiments via Social VR Platforms. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

[105]

Alcínia Zita Sampaio and Octávio Martins. 2017. VR model of bridge construction: a didactic application. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference-Laval Virtual 2017. 1–3.

Digital Library

[106]

Charles T Scialfa, Philip M Garvey, Kenneth W Gish, Linda M Deering, Herschel W Leibowitz, and Charles C Goebel. 1988. Relationships among measures of static and dynamic visual sensitivity. Human Factors 30, 6 (1988), 677–687.

Digital Library

[107]

Philip Sedgwick and Nan Greenwood. 2015. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. Bmj 351(2015).

[108]

Jinsil Hwaryoung Seo, Brian Michael Smith, Margaret Cook, Erica Malone, Michelle Pine, Steven Leal, Zhikun Bai, and Jinkyo Suh. 2017. Anatomy builder VR: Applying a constructive learning method in the virtual reality canine skeletal system. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, 245–252.

[109]

John J Shaughnessy, Eugene B Zechmeister, and Jeanne S Zechmeister. 2000. Research methods in psychology. McGraw-Hill.

[110]

Samarth Singhal and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. Bewithme: An immersive telepresence system for distance separated couples. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 307–310.

Digital Library

[111]

Chareen Snelson and Yu-Chang Hsu. 2020. Educational 360-degree videos in virtual reality: A scoping review of the emerging research. TechTrends 64, 3 (2020), 404–412.

[112]

Hyo-Jeong So and Thomas A Brush. 2008. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & education 51, 1 (2008), 318–336.

[113]

Marco Speicher, Anna Maria Feit, Pascal Ziegler, and Antonio Krüger. 2018. Selection-based text entry in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.

Digital Library

[114]

Adam Stefanile. 2020. The transition from classroom to Zoom and how it has changed education. Journal of social science research 16 (2020), 33–40.

[115]

John Sweller, Jeroen JG Van Merrienboer, and Fred GWC Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review 10, 3 (1998), 251–296.

[116]

Anthony Tang and Omid Fakourfar. 2017. Watching 360° Videos Together. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.

[117]

Yang Tian, Chi-Wing Fu, Shengdong Zhao, Ruihui Li, Xiao Tang, Xiaowei Hu, and Pheng-Ann Heng. 2019. Enhancing Augmented VR Interaction via Egocentric Scene Analysis. 3, 3 (2019).

Digital Library

[118]

Bruce Torff and Rose Tirotta. 2010. Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education 54, 2 (2010), 379–383.

Digital Library

[119]

Nicola Walshe and Paul Driver. 2019. Developing reflective trainee teacher practice with 360-degree video. Teaching and Teacher Education 78 (2019), 97–105.

[120]

Cheng Yao Wang, Mose Sakashita, Upol Ehsan, Jingjin Li, and Andrea Stevenson Won. 2020. Again, together: Socially reliving virtual reality experiences when separated. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.

Digital Library

[121]

Fu Wang, Ying Liu, Min Tian, Yumei Zhang, Shaofeng Zhang, and Jihua Chen. 2016. Application of a 3D haptic virtual reality simulation system for dental crown preparation training. In 2016 8th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME). IEEE, 424–427.

[122]

Max Wilson, Wendy Mackay, Ed Chi, Michael Bernstein, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2012. RepliCHI SIG: From a panel to a new submission venue for replication. In CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1185–1188.

Digital Library

[123]

Max LL Wilson, Paul Resnick, David Coyle, and Ed H Chi. 2013. Replichi: the workshop. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3159–3162.

Digital Library

[124]

Chengpei Xu, Ruomei Wang, Shujin Lin, Xiaonan Luo, Baoquan Zhao, Lijie Shao, and Mengqiu Hu. 2019. Lecture2Note: Automatic Generation of Lecture Notes from Slide-Based Educational Videos. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). IEEE, 898–903.

[125]

Kiwon Yeom, Jounghuem Kwon, JooHyun Maeng, and Bum-Jae You. 2015. [POSTER] Haptic Ring Interface Enabling Air-Writing in Virtual Reality Environment. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. IEEE, 124–127.

Digital Library

[126]

Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef, Mohamed Amine Chatti, and Ulrik Schroeder. 2014. The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences 6, 3 (2014), 122–135.

[127]

Carmen Zahn, Karsten Krauskopf, Friedrich W Hesse, and Roy Pea. 2012. How to improve collaborative learning with video tools in the classroom? Social vs. cognitive guidance for student teams. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 7, 2(2012), 259–284.

[128]

Shan Zhang, Xiaojun Meng, Can Liu, Shengdong Zhao, Vibhor Sehgal, and Morten Fjeld. 2019. ScaffoMapping: Assisting concept mapping for video learners. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 314–328.

Digital Library

[129]

Huahui Zhao, Kirk PH Sullivan, and Ingmarie Mellenius. 2014. Participation, interaction and social presence: An exploratory study of collaboration in online peer review groups. British Journal of Educational Technology 45, 5 (2014), 807–819.

[130]

Jiayan Zhao, Peter LaFemina, Julia Carr, Pejman Sajjadi, Jan Oliver Wallgrün, and Alexander Klippel. 2020. Learning in the field: Comparison of desktop, immersive virtual reality, and actual field trips for place-based STEM education. In 2020 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). IEEE, 893–902.

Cited By

Damaševičius RSidekerskienė T(2024)Virtual Worlds for Learning in Metaverse: A Narrative ReviewSustainability10.3390/su1605203216:5(2032)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052032
Chen KYang QYuan QPan Z(2024)Exploring the Impact of Bidirectional Interactions Between VR and SAR on Cultural ExhibitionProceedings of the 19th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry10.1145/3703619.3706044(1-8)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3703619.3706044
Yuan YJin QMills CYarosh SNeustaedter C(2024)Designing Collaborative Technology for Intergenerational Social Play over DistanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870318:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687031
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Collaborative Online Learning with VR Video: Roles of Collaborative Tools and Shared Video Control
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. Collaborative learning
    2. Distance learning
2. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Designing for collaborative learning in immersive virtual reality: a systematic literature review
Abstract
Immersive learning technologies such as virtual reality have long been deemed as the next generation of digital learning environments. There is a limited number of studies addressing how immersive technologies can be designed, applied, and studied ...
Collaborative VR Anatomy Atlas Investigating Multi-user Anatomy Learning
Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality
Abstract
In medical education, anatomy is typically taught through lectures, cadaver dissection, and using replicas. Advances in VR technology facilitated the development of specialized VR tools for teaching, training, and other tasks. They can provide ...
Effect of using Walk-In-Place Interface for Panoramic Video Play in VR
SUI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction

This paper describes the use of walk-in-place (WIP) interface to control the speed of 360-degree panoramic virtual reality (VR) video on a head-mounted display and through a pilot user study, the effect of using this interface with respect to the amount ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

NSF

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
1,070
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)631
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Damaševičius RSidekerskienė T(2024)Virtual Worlds for Learning in Metaverse: A Narrative ReviewSustainability10.3390/su1605203216:5(2032)Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052032
Chen KYang QYuan QPan Z(2024)Exploring the Impact of Bidirectional Interactions Between VR and SAR on Cultural ExhibitionProceedings of the 19th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and its Applications in Industry10.1145/3703619.3706044(1-8)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3703619.3706044
Yuan YJin QMills CYarosh SNeustaedter C(2024)Designing Collaborative Technology for Intergenerational Social Play over DistanceProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36870318:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687031
Liu YJin QZhang ZHan BYarosh SQian F(2024)HoloClass: Enhancing VR Classroom with Live Volumetric Video StreamingAdjunct Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3672539.3686330(1-3)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672539.3686330
Rifat MAyad RAsha AHuang BOkman SSabie DFerdous HSoden RAhmed S(2024)Cohabitant: The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Application for Interfaith Learning and Empathy BuildingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642821(1-19)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642821
Jin QLiu YYuan YHan BQian FYarosh S(2024)Virtual Reality, Real Pedagogy: A Contextual Inquiry of Instructor Practices with VR VideoProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642510(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642510
Lee GHealey JManocha D(2024)DocuBits: VR Document Decomposition for Procedural Task Completion2024 IEEE Conference Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)10.1109/VR58804.2024.00053(309-319)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VR58804.2024.00053
Yu MBi C(2023)Timeline Exploration in 360° VideoProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614533(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3607822.3614533
Takenawa MSugimoto NWöhler LIkehata SAizawa KEl Saddik AMei TCucchiara RBertini MTobon Vallejo DAtrey PHossain M(2023)360RVW: Fusing Real 360° Videos and Interactive Virtual WorldsProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3581783.3612670(9379-9381)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3581783.3612670
Poh ETang ALee JShengdong Z(2023)Supporting Artefact Awareness in Partially-Replicated Workspaces2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00019(55-59)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00019
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Conten