How Driver Monitoring System Effectively Alerts Drivers of Partially Automated Vehicles
Authors: 
Wen Jiang, Xiaojun Luo, Jifang WangAuthors Info & Claims
Wen Jiang, Xiaojun Luo, Jifang WangAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 145 - 148
Abstract
Automated driving systems today cannot ensure that drivers can be completely liberated from the driving task. In this condition, Driver Monitoring System (DMS) through non-driving tasks could be necessary to ensure alertness and availability during highly automated driving. How to identify and alert by DMS in Shared Autonomy Era is virtually worth researching in the field of Human Machine Interface. By understanding different types of drivers and drivers' different states on their response time when they perceive DMS or take over alert. Further sort out the factors that affect the response time of drivers, and then output suggestions with different levels of alerts through the comprehensive judgment of the system to help carmakers develop more flexible and humanized human-computer interaction principles.
References
[1]
Ali R. Samani, Sabyasachee Mishra, and Kakan Dey. 2022. Assessing the effect of long-automated driving operation, repeated take-over requests, and drivers’ characteristics on commercial motor vehicle drivers’ driving behavior and reaction time in highly automated vehicles. In Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour. 84(2022), 239-261.
[2]
Z. Lu, B. Zhang, A. Feldhütter, R. Happee, M.Martens, and J.C.F. De Winter. 2019. Beyond mere take-over requests: The effects of monitoring requests on driver attention, take-over performance, and acceptance. In Transportation Research Part F. 63(2019), 22-37.
[3]
Tim Jannusch, Darren Shannon, Michaele Völler, Finbarr Murphy, and Martin Mullins. 2021. Cars and distraction: How to address the limits of Driver Monitoring Systems and improve safety benefits using evidence from German young drivers. In Technology in Society. 66(2021)101628.
[4]
Alexandria M. Noble, Melissa Miles, Miguel A. Perez, Feng Guo, and Sheila G. Klauer. 2021. Evaluating driver eye glance behavior and secondary task engagement while using driving automation systems. In Accident Analysis and Prevention. 151(2021)105959.
[5]
M.S. Satyanarayana, T.M. Aruna, and Y.K. Guruprasad. 2021. Continuous monitoring and identification of driver drowsiness alert system. In Global Transitions Proceedings. 2(2021), 123-127.
[6]
Lex Fridman. 2018. Human-Centered Autonomous Vehicle Systems: Principles of Effective Shared Autonomy. arXiv: Artificial Intelligence.
[7]
Tobias Vogelpohl, Matthias Kühn, Thomas Hummel, and Mark Vollrath. 2019. Asleep at the automated wheel—Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving. In Accident Analysis and Prevention. 126(2019),70-84
[8]
Gaëtan Merlhiot and Mercedes Bueno. 2021. How drowsiness and distraction can interfere with take-over performance: A systematic and meta-analysis review. In Accident Analysis and Prevention.
[9]
Danee Choi, Toshihisa Sato, Takafumi Ando, Takashi Abe, and Motoyuki Akamatsu. 2020. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving. In Applied Ergonomics. 85(2020) 103074.
[10]
Bo Zhang, Joost de Winter, Silvia Varotto, Riender Happee, and Marieke Martens. 2019. Determinants of take-over time from automated driving: A meta-analysis of 129 studies. In Transportation Research Part F. 64(2019), 285-307.
[11]
Jayanta K. Baruah, Rabindranath Bera, and Sourav Dhar. 2018. Ranking of Sensors for ADAS: An MCDM-Based Approach. In Advances in Communication, Devices and Networking. Springer,563-571.
[12]
Jesse Levinson and Sebastian Thrun. 2010. Robust vehicle localization in urban environments using probabilistic maps. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 4372-4378.
[13]
Pavan Turaga, Rama Chellappa, Venkatramana S Subrahmanian, and Octavian Udrea. 2008. Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. In Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, IEEE Transactions on 18, 11 (2008),1473-1488.
[14]
Zhihong Zeng, Maja Pantic, Glenn Roisman, and Thomas S Huang. 2009. A survey of affect recognition methods: Audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions. In Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions. 31, 1(2009), 39-58.
[15]
Qiong Wang, Jingyu Yang, Mingwu Ren and Yujie Zheng. 2006. Driver fatigue detection: a survey. In Intelligent Control and Automation, 2006. WCICA 2006. The Sixth World Congress. Vol. 2. IEEE, 8587-8591.
[16]
Mahtab Ghazizadeh and John D. Lee. 2018. Modelling Driver acceptance: From feedback to monitoring and mentoring systems. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology. CRC Press,51-70.
Recommendations
A Preliminary Evaluation of Driver’s Workload in Partially Automated Vehicles
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive SystemsAbstractDriving could result in driver’s overload if the demands of the tasks are beyond the attentional capacity of the driver, which is the main cause of poor driving performance and high car accident risks. As the use of automation is becoming ...
Driver Capability Monitoring in Highly Automated Driving: From State to Capability Monitoring
ITSC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation SystemsA collision probability estimator in the advent of an emergency Take Over Request (TOR) that considers the driver reaction time and the driver state is an essential tool for developing driver assistance systems for Highly Automated Driving (HAD). In ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2022
225 pages
Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 17 September 2022
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Work in progress
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
AutomotiveUI '22
Sponsor:
AutomotiveUI '22: 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
September 17 - 20, 2022
Seoul, Republic of Korea
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 101Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)24
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 04 Oct 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format