Key Performance Indicators in Brazilian Software Development Companies: a Survey
Authors: 
Mariana Alexandre, 
Edson Oliveira, Jr, Ana Paula M. Carvalho, Thelma E. Colanzi, Renato BalancieriAuthors Info & Claims
Mariana Alexandre, Edson Oliveira, Jr, Ana Paula M. Carvalho, Thelma E. Colanzi, Renato BalancieriAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 60 - 68
Abstract
This paper addresses the importance of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in software development management. These indicators are quantitative and qualitative metrics that help measure, monitor, and evaluate the performance and quality of the software development process. The objective of the study is to identify which KPIs are most commonly used by companies, understand how these indicators positively impact the work of development teams, and analyze the challenges faced in their implementation. The research was conducted through an online survey, collecting data from 13 participants. The results showed that all participants were familiar with KPIs, and most had received adequate training on their use. The most mentioned KPIs were Bug Control, Failure Rate, Impediments, Cycle Time, and Lead Time. The benefits observed included improved communication, increased productivity, and identification of technical bottlenecks. However, participants also highlighted challenges such as process interruptions when expectations are not met and cultural differences. In conclusion, the study indicates that the use of KPIs contributes to improving software development processes and benefits project management. Nevertheless, KPIs must be implemented gradually and continuously monitored to overcome challenges and maximize their benefits.
References
[1]
Adela del Río-Ortega, Manuel Resinas, Cristina Cabanillas, and Antonio Ruiz-Cortés. 2013. On the definition and design-time analysis of process performance indicators. Information Systems 38, 4 (2013), 470–490. Special section on BPM 2011 conference.
[2]
Eladio Domínguez, Beatriz Pérez, Ángel L. Rubio, and María A. Zapata. 2019. A taxonomy for key performance indicators management. Computer Standards & Interfaces 64 (2019), 24–40.
[3]
M. Falck and F. Karlsson. 2011. Key Performance Indicators - The Key to Success? Master’s thesis. Jönköping University, Jönköping.
[4]
Farnaz Fotrousi, Samuel A. Fricker, Markus Fiedler, and Franck Le-Gall. 2014. KPIs for Software Ecosystems: A Systematic Mapping Study. In Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery, Casper Lassenius and Kari Smolander (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 194–211.
[5]
Ahmad Nauman Ghazi, Kai Petersen, Sri Sai Vijay Raj Reddy, and Harini Nekkanti. 2019. Survey Research in Software Engineering: Problems and Mitigation Strategies. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 24703–24718.
[6]
Stephen H. Kan. 2002. Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering (2 ed.). Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA.
[7]
Jukka Mannila. 2014. Key Performance Indicators in Agile Software Development. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE/ACM.
[8]
Alejandro Maté, Kostas Zoumpatianos, Themis Palpanas, Juan Trujillo, John Mylopoulos, and Elvis Koci. 2014. A Systematic Approach for Dynamic Targeted Monitoring of KPIs. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference of the Center for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research (CASCON). IBM Corp., 30–44. https://disi.unitn.it/ themis/publications/cascon14.pdf
[9]
Jefferson Seide Molléri, Kai Petersen, and Emilia Mendes. 2016. Survey Guidelines in Software Engineering: An Annotated Review. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement(ESEM ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.
[10]
Trailokya Raj Ojha. 2014. Analysis of Key Performance Indicators in Software Development. Master’s thesis. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/123456789/22244
[11]
Luis Olsina and Ma de los Angeles Martíngidis. ano de publicação desconhecido. Ontology for Software Metrics and Indicators. Department of Informatics, Engineering School at Universidad Nacional de La Pampa (ano de publicação desconhecido).
[12]
Daniela C. A. Pigosso and et al.2010. Maintenance Productivity Indicators: An Analysis of Practices in Industry. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution 22, 4 (2010), 285–304.
[13]
Viara Popova and Alexei Sharpanskykh. 2010. Modeling organizational performance indicators. Information Systems 35, 4 (2010), 505–527. Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for Enterprise and Business Process Modeling and Management.
[14]
Forrest Shull, Janice Singer, and Dag I.K. Sjøberg. 2008. Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, Maryland, USA.
[15]
Maike Vollstedt and Sebastian Rezat. 2019. An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 81–100.
Index Terms
- Key Performance Indicators in Brazilian Software Development Companies: a Survey
Recommendations
Key performance indicators for business models: a systematic review and catalog
AbstractOrganizations continuously adapt and innovate their business models to remain competitive. To support the management of business models throughout their lifecycle, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to business models play an important ...
Specification and derivation of key performance indicators for business analytics
Key Performance Indicators (KPI) measure the performance of an enterprise relative to its objectives thereby enabling corrective action where there are deviations. In current practice, KPIs are manually integrated within dashboards and scorecards used ...
Conceptualizing and specifying key performance indicators in business strategy models
ER'12: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on Conceptual ModelingKey Performance Indicators (KPI) measure the performance of an organization relative to its objectives. To monitor organizational performance relative to KPIs, such KPIs need to be manually implemented in the form of data warehouse queries, to be used ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
November 2024
763 pages
ISBN:9798400717772
DOI:10.1145/3701625
Copyright © 2024 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 21 December 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Funding Sources
- CNPq/Brazil
Conference
SBQS 2024
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 99 submissions, 35%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 19Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)19
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in