Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
This is a study of final poststressed vowel devoicing following /s/ in Brazilian Portuguese. We contradict the literature describing it as deletion by arguing, first, that the vowel is not deleted, but overlapped and devoiced by the /s/, and, second, that gradient reduction with devoicing may lead to apocope diachronically. The following results support our view: (1) partially devoiced vowels are centralized; (2) centralization is inversely proportional to duration; (3) total devoicing is accompanied by lowering of the /s/ centroid; (4) the /s/ noise seems to be lengthened when the vowel is totally devoiced; (5) aerodynamic tests reveal that lengthened /s/ has a final vowel-like portion, too short to be voiced; (6) lengthened /s/ favors vowel recovery in perceptual tests. This seems to be a likely path from reduction to devoicing to listener-based apocope.
verified
References
1 Albano E, Meneses F (2015): Novas luzes sobre a Dinâmica Sincrônica e Diacrônica do Desvozeamento Vocálico (oral presentation). Cadernos de resumos do X Congresso Internacional da Abralin. Bélem, Pará, pp 59-60.Search in Google Scholar
2 Aquino P (1997):·papel das vogais reduzidas pós-tônicas na construção de um sistema de síntese concatenativa para·português do Brasil; master degree thesis, Unicamp, Campinas.Search in Google Scholar
3 Beckman M, De Jong K, Jun S-A, Lee S-H (1992): The interaction of coarticulation and prosody in sound change. Lang Speech 35:45-58.10.1177/002383099203500205Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4 Browman CP, Goldstein L (1987): Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech: Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-92; in Kingston J, Beckman ME (eds): Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 1-30.Search in Google Scholar
5 Browman C, Goldstein L (1989): Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6:201-251.10.1017/S0952675700001019Search in Google Scholar
6 Browman C, Goldstein L (1990): Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech; in Kingston J, Beckman M (eds): Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Between the Grammar and the Physics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019Search in Google Scholar
7 Câmara JM Jr (1953): Para·estudo da Fonêmica Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro, Organização Simões.10.2307/410477Search in Google Scholar
8 Câmara JM Jr (1970): Estrutura da língua portuguesa, ed 15. Petrópolis, Vozes.Search in Google Scholar
9 Chitoran I, Iskarous K (2008): Acoustic evidence for high vowel devoicing in Lezgi. Proceedings of ISSP 8, Strasbourg, pp 93-96.Search in Google Scholar
10 Cunha C (2015): Portuguese lexical clusters and CVC sequences in speech perception and production. Phonetica 72:138-161.10.1159/000441360Search in Google Scholar
11 Davidson L (2006): Schwa elision in fast speech: segmental deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63:79-112.10.1159/000095304Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12 Dubiela MR (2013): A vogal /e/ átona final em falantes curitibanos. Monografia Linguística. Curitiba, UFPR.Search in Google Scholar
13 Fabra LR (2015): Can nonnative speakers reduce English vowels in a native-like fashion? Evidence from L1-Spanish L2-English bilinguals. Phonetica 72:162-181.10.1159/000430920Search in Google Scholar
14 Fagyal Z, Moisset C (1999): Sound change and articulatory release: where and why are high vowels devoiced in Parisian French? Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley, University of California, pp 309-312.Search in Google Scholar
15 Feng L (2007): The articulatory and acoustic study of fricative vowels in Suzhou Chinese. 16th ICPhS XVI, Saarbrücken.Search in Google Scholar
16 Fernandes AC (2007): Apagamento de vogais átonas em trissílabos proparoxítonos: um contributo para a compreensão da supressão vocálica em português europeu; master degree thesis, Universidade do Porto.Search in Google Scholar
17 Ferreira APP (2007): Pet or Pety? Diferenças entre palavras CVC e CVCV do inglês por aprendizes brasileiros: uma análise acústica; master degree thesis, Curitiba.Search in Google Scholar
18 Ghio A, Teston B (2004): Evaluation of the acoustic and aerodynamic constraints of a pneumotachograph for speech and voice studies. Proceedings of International Conference on Voice Physiology and Biomechanics, Marseille, Université de la Méditerranée, pp 55-58.Search in Google Scholar
19 Han MS (1962): Unvoicing of vowels in Japanese. Nihon Onsei Gakkai 10:81-100.Search in Google Scholar
20 Harrington J (2012): The relationship between synchronic variation and diachronic change; in Cohn A, Fougeron C, Huffman M (eds): Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 321-332.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199575039.013.0013Search in Google Scholar
21 Harrington J, Fletcher J, Roberts C (1995): An analysis of truncation and linear rescaling in the production of accented and unaccented vowels. J Phonet 23:305-322.10.1515/lp-2012-0011Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22 Iskarous K, McDonough J, Whalen DH (2012): A gestural account of the velar fricative in Navajo. Lab Phonol 3:195-210.10.1515/lp-2012-0011Search in Google Scholar
23 Jannedy S (1995): Gestural phasing as an explanation for vowel devoicing in Turkish. Ohio State Univ Work Papers Ling 45:56-84.10.1080/0269920031000086248Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24 Kent R, Kim Y (2003): Toward an acoustic typology of motor speech disorders. Clin Ling Phonet 17:427-445.10.1080/0269920031000086248Search in Google Scholar
25 Kondo M (1997): Syllable constraints on Japanese vowel duration and intensity; in Groupe Acoustique, Apprentissage et Interprétation (eds): La voyelle dans tous ses états. Nantes, Université de Nantes, pp 32-37.Search in Google Scholar
26 Kondo M (2005): Syllable structure and its acoustic effects on vowels in devoicing environments; in van de Weijer J, Nanjo K, Nishihara T (eds): Voicing in Japanese. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 229-245.10.2307/412715Search in Google Scholar
27 Labov W (1972): Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
28 Lemle M (1966): Phonemic System of the Portuguese of Rio de Janeiro; thesis, University of Pennsylvania.10.1121/1.2142410Search in Google Scholar
29 Lindblom B (1963): Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J Acoust Soc Am 35:1773-1781.10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar
30 Meneses F (2012): As Vogais Desvozeadas No Português Brasileiro: Investigação Acústico-Articulatória; master degree thesis, Unicamp, Campinas.Search in Google Scholar
31 Meneses FO, Albano E (2013): From devoicing to apocope: an acoustic study of poststressed high vowel lenition in Brazilian Portuguese. Phonetics and Phonology in Iberia, Universidade de Lisboa.Search in Google Scholar
32 Ohala JJ (1981): The listener as a source of sound change; in Masek CS, Hendrick RA, Miller M (eds): Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior. Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, pp 178-203.Search in Google Scholar
33 Ohala JJ (1993): The phonetics of sound change; in Jones C (ed): Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives. London, Longman, pp 237-278.Search in Google Scholar
34 Pagel D (1993): Contribuição para·estudo das vogais orais inacentuadas no português brasileiro. Cad Estud Ling 25:85-99.Search in Google Scholar
35 Ramus F, Dupoux E, Mehler J (2003): The psychological reality of rhythm classes: perceptual studies. 15th ICPhS, Barcelona, pp 337-342.10.5433/2237-4876.2012v15n1p311Search in Google Scholar
36 Rolo M, Mota J (2012): Um estudo sociolinguístico sobre·apagamento de vogais finais em uma localidade rural da Bahia. Londrina, SIGNUM: Estudos Linguísticos, No 15/1, pp 311-334.10.1006/jpho.1996.0007Search in Google Scholar
37 Romero J (1996): Articulatory blending of lingual gestures. J Phonet 24:99-111.10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2Search in Google Scholar
38 Saltzman E, Munhall K (1989): A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecol Psychol 1:333-382.10.1207/s15326969eco0104_2Search in Google Scholar
39 Souza RFN (2012): A Redução de Vogais Altas Pretônicas no Português de Belo Horizonte: Uma Abordagem Baseada na Gradiência; master degree thesis, UFMG.10.1017/S095926950300111X Search in Google Scholar
40 Smith CL (2003): Vowel devoicing in contemporary French. J French Lang Stud 13:177-194.10.1017/S095926950300111XSearch in Google Scholar
41 Taylor M (1994): The Interaction of Vowel Deletion and Syllable Structure Constraints; PhD thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.Search in Google Scholar
42 Tsuchida A (1997): Phonetics and Phonology of Japanese Vowel Devoicing; PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.Search in Google Scholar
43 Vaissière J (2009): Articulatory modeling and the definition of acoustic-perceptual targets for reference vowels. Chin Phonet J 2:22-33.Search in Google Scholar
44 Van Bergem D (1995): Acoustic and Lexical Vowel Reduction, in Studies in Language and Language Use 16; PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.10.1016/0167-6393(95)00003-7Search in Google Scholar
45 Viaro ME (2005): Algumas considerações acerca do português falado quatrocentista e quinhentista. Brasília, Papia, vol 15, pp 80-101.Search in Google Scholar
46 Viegas MC, Oliveira AJ (2008): Apagamento da vogal átona final em Itaúna/MG e atuação lexical. Rev Abralin 7:119-138.Search in Google Scholar
47 Wheeler MW (2007): La síncope i l'apòcope en la història del català: una aproximació des de l'Optimitat; in Wheeler MW (ed): Morfologia i fonologia catalana i romànica: estudis diacrònics. Valencia, Universitat de València.Search in Google Scholar
48 Zsiga EC (2000): Phonetic alignment constraints: consonant overlap and palatalization in English and Russian. J Phonet 28:69-102.10.1006/jpho.2000.0109Search in Google Scholar
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
