Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Gomeopatiya (gomeo... va yun. pathos — dard, kasallik) — pseudo-ilmiy[1][2][3][4] davolash sistemasi; uxshashni oʻxshashi bilan davolash ("oʻxshashlik qonuni") degan yoʻnalish boʻlib, bunda sogʻlom kishida muayyan kasallik belgisini keltirib chiqarishi mumkin boʻlgan dorilarning kichik dozasi bilan bemorni davolash tushuniladi. G.ning asosiy prinsiplarini nemis vrachi S. Xanemann (1755—1843) ishlab chiqqan (1796).

Bunday vositalar ko‘pincha o‘simlik va hayvonlardan olinadi. Gomeopatik dori vositalari osonroq tushuntirganda oz-ozdan qabul qilganda davo , ko‘p miqdorda qabul qilganda kasallik qo‘zg‘atuvchi hisoblanadi. Bunday dori vositalariga :

Rengalin - quruq hamda nam yo‘talni yengillashtirish uchun.

Ergoferon - gripp va shamollashni davolash uchun

Kabilar kiradi.

Adabiyotlar

tahrir
  • OʻzME. Birinchi jild. Toshkent, 2000-yil
  1. Tuomela, R „Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience“, . Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Springer, 1987 — 83–101-bet. DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN 978-94-010-8181-8. 
  2. Smith K (2012). "Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical". Bioethics 26 (9): 508–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01956.x. https://zenodo.org/record/1035885. 
  3. „Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?“, Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?. Springer, 2014 — 19–57-bet. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-8540-7. „within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery“ 
  4. Ladyman J „Chapter 3: Towards a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience“, . Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press, 2013 — 48–49-bet. ISBN 978-0-226-05196-3. „Yet homeopathy is a paradigmatic example of pseudoscience. It is neither simply bad science nor science fraud, but rather profoundly departs from scientific method and theories while being described as scientific by some of its adherents (often sincerely).“