A J Godzieba
Professor Emeritus of fundamental, systematic, and philosophical theology at Villanova University. Editor Emeritus of Horizons: The Journal of the College Theology Society. Co-editor (with Judith Gruber [KU Leuven] and Jennifer Newsome Martin [Notre Dame]) of the series "T&T Clark Explorations at the Crossroads of Theology & Aesthetics."
Recent publications include Beyond Dogmatism and Innocence: Hermeneutics, Critique, and Catholic Theology, co-edited with Bradford E. Hinze (Liturgical Press, 2017), and A Theology of the Presence and Absence of God (Liturgical Press, 2018).
I am currently researching the intersection of art, music, theology, spirituality, and embodiment in early modern Catholicism, along with applications of this intersection for contemporary belief and practice.
Recent publications include Beyond Dogmatism and Innocence: Hermeneutics, Critique, and Catholic Theology, co-edited with Bradford E. Hinze (Liturgical Press, 2017), and A Theology of the Presence and Absence of God (Liturgical Press, 2018).
I am currently researching the intersection of art, music, theology, spirituality, and embodiment in early modern Catholicism, along with applications of this intersection for contemporary belief and practice.
less
InterestsView All (20)
Uploads
Papers by A J Godzieba
It was not unheard of that 17th century Lutheran composers would re-text Italian Marian motets for use in Lutheran contexts, and so Bach’s treatment of Pergolesi was not unprecedented. However, this raises a crucial question: how can a specific musical work expressing a particular set of affects support different texts with divergent religious claims? This paper takes a phenomenological approach and asks whether, beneath these religious texts and their claims, there may have been a more fundamental devotional affect and intentionality that 17th- and 18th-century Lutheran and Catholic piety shared and that might be appropriated today.
It was not unheard of that 17th century Lutheran composers would re-text Italian Marian motets for use in Lutheran contexts, and so Bach’s treatment of Pergolesi was not unprecedented. However, this raises a crucial question: how can a specific musical work expressing a particular set of affects support different texts with divergent religious claims? This paper takes a phenomenological approach and asks whether, beneath these religious texts and their claims, there may have been a more fundamental devotional affect and intentionality that 17th- and 18th-century Lutheran and Catholic piety shared and that might be appropriated today.