No matter how soothing the White House’s overtures to business leaders sounded this week, an inconvenient fact remains: Washington is gripped by crab-in-the-bucket syndrome. And there’s no cure in sight.
Put a single crab in an uncovered bucket, and it will find a way to climb up and out on its own. Put a dozen crabs in a bucket, and eleven will fight with all their might to pull down the striver who attempts escape. President Obama sought to reassure 20 CEOs that he wasn’t the king crab holding them down: “I want to dispel any notion we want to inhibit your success,” he cooed. “We want to be boosters because when you do well, America does well.”
Take it all with a huge grain of sea salt.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADVERTISEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This is, after all, the same “booster” who in April mused openly about limits on profits, government determinations of what constitutes a “good” product or service, and the expectation that private businesses should serve a collective need to goose Washington’s jobs numbers. “I mean, I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money,” the president said. “But, you know, part of the American way is, you know, you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or providing good service. We don’t want people to stop, ah, fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow our economy.”
Our Founding Fathers had quite a different view of “the American way,” of course. In 1816, Thomas Jefferson wrote: “To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his fathers has acquired too much, in order to spare to others, who, or whose fathers, have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, the guarantee to everyone the free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it.”
But, like a success inhibitor injected into the body politic, Obama’s policies have only served to suppress growth, punish ambition, and discourage profit maximizers. He has railed against “fat cats” on Wall Street while protecting his favored financial-industry benefactors. He threatened to “kick” the “a**es” of oil-industry executives while refusing to punish the scientific lies and distortions of his own job-killing environmental czars and bureaucrats. He inveighed against the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for collecting dues from international affiliates while ignoring the same practices among deep-pocketed unions. And he bemoaned tax relief for “millionaires and billionaires” that would actually benefit wealth-producing couples who annually earn more than $250,000 and individuals who earn $200,000 or more.
Most small-business owners will tell you they don’t want Obama “boosting” them. They just want him to get out of the way. But none of them were represented at his CEO shindig. Instead, among the business “leaders” the White House invited was billionaire Penny Pritzker — a Chicago crony, Democratic fundraiser/bundler, and heiress whose family co-owned a failed subprime specialty bank.
While Obama, the olive-branch poseur, has called for a restoration of “civility” in Washington, and liberal elites whine and whinny about the need for “no labels,” class-warfare demagoguery has metastasized unchecked.
Socialist Bernie Sanders took to the Senate floor to filibuster against tax relief for all Americans last week in a ponderous, eight-and-a-half-hour harangue against “greed,” the “rich,” “richer,” and “richest,” and “millionaires and billionaires” he had the audacity to liken to “bandits.” On the House side, New York Democratic congressman Joe Crowley attacked the GOP as the party of the wealthy and compared all people who earn more than $250,000 a year to the late convicted tax evader Leona Helmsley and her Maltese-doggie heir.
The Left wastes no opportunity to blame Tea Party and talk-radio rhetoric for violent acts by lone nuts. But when a suspected serial arsonist (still on the loose) burns down expensive homes in an upscale Cape Cod neighborhood and spray-paints “f**k the rich” graffiti at the crime scenes, the “words-have-consequences” crowd is nowhere to be found. Such is the silence of the crabs.
— Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies. © 2010 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
MAFV
12/17/10 19:13
Link
Report Abuse
At the heart of the liberal mind and agenda is their unbridled will to remove suffering...to eliminate the poor - all that they have ever done and said revolves around this simple fact. For them to do so however, requires them to remove the nature and notion of God for "the poor will always be with you"...and the experience of this great thing we call "Life" reveals that to live is to suffer regardless of one's political or religious bent - suffering is just like death - no mortal being has survived death. Liberals/Progressives and the state are the new God - they wish us to worship the "reason" of their state...the United States is the last best hope of mankind...two struggles are in play one with atheists/agnostics who wish to eradicate "belief"; the other who terrorize us to believe as they do...when what the politically correct identify as a "clash of cultures" turns rightfully into a calsh of religions it will be intersting to see where the the ilk of Obama hang there hats...as of right now it is all fun and games - surface games like taxes-DADT-stimulus-Pork...when will the Repubs wake up and call it like it truly is...the modern liberal/progressive mind has no use for our founding documents and niether do the terrorists...they have something in common...at least for now.
greg wood
12/17/10 13:20
Link
Report Abuse
Michelle M: The last line on the "crab bucket" column; what a great time to add T.S. Elliot's "scuttling across the bottom of silent seas" line. Great story. Greg
Robert Keeter
12/17/10 09:30
Link
Report Abuse
I'm glad Michelle noted that the president only invited executives of large corporations to his little get together. I have nothing against big business. Capital formation on a scale to tackle many projects requires heavy hitters. The problem is that the politicians rather than diligently working to keep a level playing field and enforce the rules fairly too often help big business tilt that playing field their way. In so doing they make big business little more than agencies of a heavy handed government. I would like to see Michelle or someone shine more light on the government-big business axis of evil.