Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2002, Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
This chapter reviews the extensive literature on bias in favor of in-groups at the expense of out-groups. We focus on five issues and identify areas for future research: (a) measurement and conceptual issues (especially in-group favoritism vs. out-group derogation, and explicit vs. implicit measures of bias); (b) modern theories of bias highlighting motivational explanations (social identity, optimal distinctiveness, uncertainty reduction, social dominance, terror management); (c) key moderators of bias, especially those that exacerbate bias (identification, group size, status and power, threat, positive-negative asymmetry, personality and individual differences); (d) reduction of bias (individual vs. intergroup approaches, especially models of social categorization); and (e) the link between intergroup bias and more corrosive forms of social hostility.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006
European Journal of Social Psychology, 2005
Peace & Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2014
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2017
Journal of personality and social psychology, 2015
We tested a novel process we term implicit homophily in which perceivers' implicit outgroup bias shapes their affiliative responses toward ingroup targets with outgroup friends as a function of perceived similarity. Across 4 studies, we tested implicit homophily in the context of racial groups. We found that White participants with higher implicit anti-Black bias reported less affiliative responses toward White targets with Black friends compared with White targets with White friends, and this effect persisted above and beyond the effects of implicit pro-White bias and explicit racial bias (Studies 1-3). We further found evidence that this relationship between implicit anti-Black bias and affiliation exists because participants infer how comfortable targets are around outgroup members (Preliminary Study) and use this information to infer similarity on this dimension (Studies 1-3). Our findings also suggested that stigma transference and expectancy violation were not viable alter...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2019
Palestine/Israel Review, 2024
Dizionario di Sociologia , 2024
Reproduction Fertility and Development
Turismo e Sociedade, 2021
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2010
Nepal Medical College Journal, 2021
Gastroenterology, 2009
ACTA ZOOLÓGICA MEXICANA (N.S.)
IOP conference series, 2018
RIDE Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo