Stellenbosch Theological Journal 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17570/stj.2022.v8n2.a2
Online ISSN 2226-2385 | Print ISSN 0028-2006
2022 © Pieter de Waal Neethling Trust
Timing grace in lockdown liturgies. South
African and Dutch responses compared
Cas Wepener
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
cwepener@sun.ac.za
Johan Cilliers
Stellenbosch University, South Africa
jcilliers@sun.ac.za
Abstract
The similarities and differences regarding responses in the media to the phenomenon of
lockdown liturgy in the Netherlands and South Africa is firstly explored in this article.
The findings of Goyvaerts and Woude, which is based on their study of discussions in
Dutch media, is briefly presented and thereafter compared to responses in the South
African Afrikaans media. Based on this comparison, core themes are identified and
discussed as creative liturgical theological tensions pertaining to lockdown liturgies.
These tensions include: Excarnation – Incarnation; Global – Local; and Prophetic –
Pastoral. Revisiting and exploring these tensions are invaluable for reimagining the
liturgia condenda pertaining to lockdown liturgy specifically and online liturgy in
general.
Keywords
liturgy; ritual; lockdown; Practical Theology; Covid-19; hermeneutics
1. Introduction
In the Dutch Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies Sam Goyvaerts
and Fokke Wouda (2020) published an informative article entitled “Dutch
Responses to Lockdown Liturgies. Analysis of the Public Debate on
Sacraments During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. In this article the authors
present their findings regarding responses in Dutch media to lockdown
liturgies with an emphasis on the celebration of the sacraments (cf. also Post
2021:90–94 & 102). They analysed newspaper articles, not the lockdown
liturgies themselves, and gained insight on the public debate regarding
lockdown liturgy and the celebration of the online sacraments in their
2
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
country. By looking at responses in the Dutch media they could trace the
theological discourse embedded in the various responses and formulate
the liturgical responses as typologies.
The work of Goyvaerts and Woude (2020) stimulated the curiosity of the
authors of this article, and in the light of our Dutch colleagues’ work, we
wondered about the similarities and differences that we would find when
analysing similar sources in a South African context. This is also the first
aim of this article, namely, a brief presentation of South African sources
from the media and to engage in a comparison between the findings of
our Dutch colleagues and our own findings. Secondly, based on this
comparison, and importantly, to also develop central themes as creative
tensions related to the topic of lockdown liturgies for the South African
liturgical context.1 We believe these themes as tensions can assist worship
planners and leaders with a liturgical hermeneutics, which we here refer to
as “timing grace” (Cilliers 2019), when engaging in lockdown and online
liturgies. The main categories and conclusions of Goyvaerts and Woude, we
also identified in the South African Afrikaans media from the same period
(2020), however, there were also significant differences. These differences
we believe have to do with liturgical hermeneutics and the issue of timing
grace.
We will firstly describe the content of articles on the same topic in the South
African Afrikaans media. Thereafter compare the categories, or typologies,
of Goyvaerts and Woude to the categories that we observed in South Africa
in 2020. Lastly, we will conclude with a selection of three creative tensions
we recognise in the South African context regarding lockdown liturgies
which are significant for reimagining the liturgia condenda pertaining to
lockdown liturgy specifically and online liturgy in general.
2. Lockdown liturgy in the South African Afrikaans media
Goyvaerts and Woude (2020) found many articles, thirty-four in total, in
the Dutch media, even though they only looked at articles in two Dutch
newspapers. The newspapers they included in their study are also not
1
In a study of missional liturgy Wepener (2008) also formulated creative liturgicaltheological tensions.
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
3
specifically church newspapers or newspapers that serve as theological
mouthpieces of specific denominations, but general newspapers.2
We initially surveyed a wide variety of media publications regarding this
theme in South Africa. In the South African English media, the reality
of lockdown liturgies was mentioned as a phenomenon a few times, but
we could not find any in-depth discussions on the topic by theologians,
ministers of religion or other scholars stating opinions.3 In Afrikaans
newspapers, Beeld, Die Burger, Volksblad (Netwerk24)4 and Vrye Weeklad,
a total of five articles were published.5
Three of the articles were by journalists who just provided a general
description of lockdown liturgy as phenomenon and only briefly referred
to the possibility of cyber communion (De Kock 2020; Marx & Lawrence
2020; Smith 2020). Three articles did engage in a discussion of online
liturgy and cyber communion of which two (Wepener & Matthee 2020a
& 2020b) provided a positive appreciation of online worship and rituals
with an explicit focus on the possibilities that technology provides despite
challenges in combination with explorations of themes such as embodiment
2
3
4
5
The Dutch newspapers they included in their study are Trouw and Nederlands Dagblad
(Goyvaerts & Woude, 2020: 2).
Monama (2020) refers to the phenomenon in an article in the English newspaper The
Star; Asala (2021) in Africanews; Sonjica (2020) in Sunday Times; and Msibi (2020) in
News24. There are several similar English newspaper articles available, but they all only
state the fact of online worship and describe the phenomenon, sometimes also the loss
of income of churches as a consequence of lockdown measurements and sometimes
also quoting ministers’ and members’ experiences, but none of these articles engage
in any discussion, let alone a theological discussion, of lockdown liturgy or online
sacramental celebrations.
These three Afrikaans newspapers are published online in what is collectively called
Netwerk24.
We do not include in our discussion Afrikaans church newspapers such as Kerkbode
or Die Hervormer. The main reason is that we want to compare articles published in
roughly similar newspapers in the Netherlands and South Africa, however, even in the
newspapers of denominations we could not find theological explorations of the theme
of online liturgy or virtual sacramentality. One exception is an article by Greyling
(2020) on online liturgy and embodiment. There was also one article in Kerkbode by
Scholtz (2020) in which he provided a general description of Dutch liturgical responses
to lockdown, but this was not nearly as informative and systematic as the work of
Goyvaerts and Woude. In other South African Afrikaans news media, for example
Maroela Media, the phenomenon was mentioned, but not discussed.
4
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
and community.6 In Volksblad (also published on Netwerk24) there was a
response that focused specifically on cyber communion (Rossouw 2020).
This article was written by a Professor of Philosophy at the University of
the Free State, who is also an ordained Greek Orthodox priest.
Apart from these three articles, the absence of a deeper discussion in the
South African media regarding online liturgy or sacramentality, compared
to the Dutch responses published in two Dutch newspapers, is as such
significant. In our view it points toward the fact that the desirability of
online liturgy and sacramentality as such was clearly not a core issue in
a country where 84% of the population belong to the Christian religion
(cf. Schoeman 2013). Theological issues pertaining to desirability or
appropriateness of lockdown liturgy was skipped and practical issues
pertaining to how liturgy can best be celebrated online, was engaged with
in the media.
The first aim of this article, after this description of responses in the
media, is to compare the categories of Goyvaerts and Woude (2020) with
the categories we could identify in both the articles and via informal
observations and engagement in lockdown liturgies, which is also what
we will do in the next section. We therefore should mention that our
hunch regarding the absence of a discussion in the media regarding
lockdown liturgy, is that it on the one hand points to the fact that liturgy
is to a certain extent viewed as preaching (speaking and reading) in South
Africa; on the other hand that the pandemic inspired ministers and
theologians in South Africa to focus more on socio-economic issues such
as poverty and inequality that was exacerbated by the pandemic, and also
engage in discussions in the media on these topics, than on liturgy and
sacramentality. It is our intention to contribute to this existing lacuna
regarding a discussion of lockdown liturgy in our context by means of this
article as we believe that leitourgia and diaconia cannot be neatly separated
as is sometimes done in literature.7
6
7
For a general discussion of the experience of “unfinished rituals” during lockdown
times, see Wepener (2020).
For recent work on postcolonial liturgy in which binary thinking is challenged, see
Carvalhaes (2020 & 2021).
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
5
3. Dutch and South African categories compared
Goyvaerts and Woude (2020) focusses their article specifically on lockdown
liturgies and debates pertaining to the celebration of the sacraments. They
identified four categories or types of responses to the celebration of the
sacraments which includes, abstinence, spectator liturgy, private domestic
liturgy, and embedded domestic liturgy. We recognize all four categories
that they identified in the Netherlands also in the South African lockdown
liturgical landscape, but sometimes in a qualified sense, as well as one more
category that they did not identify in the Netherlands, which is in fact the
largest category in South Africa.
3.1 Liturgical abstinence
Liturgical abstinence, which meant that worship services were cancelled,
and that members, ministers and theologians were explicitly critical about
the possibility of online celebrations, or that abstinence means solidarity,
is the category that we encountered least. The only exception is the article
by Rossouw (2020). The liturgical abstinence that Goyvaerts and Woude
(2020; see also Post 2021:103–4) refers to was largely inspired by solidarity
with those who suffer, and liturgical abstinence thus meant co-suffering,
through liturgical sacramental abstinence, with others. Rossouw’s (2020)
motivation for liturgical abstinence is based on his understanding of liturgy
and church, of ritual embodiment and community, and the impossibility
that liturgy as a bodily action can be mediated via technology.
Rossouw’s argument prompted us to look at the webpages of the Roman
Catholic Church in South Africa to see how priests and parishes from a
more sacramentally orientated liturgical tradition than our own Dutch
reformed tradition responded liturgically during the pandemic in South
Africa. In Cape Town, for example, most parishes had sacramental worship
during lockdown8 which are either forms of spectator or embedded online
liturgies and we could not trace the category of abstinence.
We did not do an in-depth study of lockdown liturgy in Roman Catholic
parishes; however, we did do empirical research in the Dutch Reformed
8
See for a list of live streamed masses and online liturgies of Roman Catholic parishes
in Cape Town https://adct.org.za/ongoing-live-streamed-masses-and-devotions-in-thearchdiocese-of-cape-town/
6
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
Church during 2020, especially pertaining to preaching during lockdown
(see Steyn, Pieterse & Wepener 2020; Steyn & Wepener 2021) and to a
lesser extent regarding liturgy (Wepener & Cilliers, 2021). At grassroots
level liturgical abstinence was a foreign idea in most denominations and
congregations. Later in this article we will go deeper into the reasons for
this choice against abstinence, however, we can mention here that we
suspect that it has to do with the fact that ministers and theologians are
keenly attuned to the pastoral needs of faith communities in trying times,
that they hold a conviction that forms of online liturgy play an important
pastoral role and that abstinence will thus be the opposite of solidarity
with suffering people. Choosing for or against liturgical or sacramental
abstinence is related to the already mentioned hermeneutical notion of
“timing grace” (Cilliers 2019) to which we will return later.
3.2 Spectator liturgy
With spectator liturgy Goyvaerts and Woude (2020:7–8) refer to “a
physically celebrated rite, streamed, recorded, or live broadcasted through
television.” This category was indeed present in South Africa. The term
spectator liturgy, however, needs some clarification for the authors of
this article who are both from a Reformed theological tradition. From
the perspective of preaching and the discipline of Homiletics, we wonder
whether a sermon heard by worshippers in a living room over a television
set or computer, even in an asynchronous way, is really “spectator” liturgy?
The term spectator implies passivity on the part of the worshippers and
restricts them to the category of audience, but what about the inner
dynamics of the hearing process of the worshippers and even the act of
seeing the liturgy on a screen? We wonder whether the term “spectator
liturgy” does not point to a certain approach to embodiment where notions
such as hearing, and understanding are removed from the category of
embodiment? Of course, we understand that the authors needed typologies
to get a grip on phenomenon, but the choice of this terms also prompts a
discussion of hierarchy involved when it comes to the body and the senses.
In Homiletics listening and hearing is not associated with passivity, but
with active engagement of worshippers in the preaching and worship
event. Cilliers (2009:54) puts it as follows: “Certain senses or capabilities
cannot be crystallized as being the primary or most basic. It is not feasible
to abstract a core (for instance, cognitive, or verbal, or manual, or optical,
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
7
etc.) and elevate this as being the apex of humanity or the sole interpretative
medium. We are bodies, with all of our senses and capabilities being part
of a complex whole. God reveals God self to, and through, all of our senses,
for the simple reason that we are bodies.”
3.3 Private domestic liturgy
This category the authors describe as “makeshift liturgies at home” and
also that they “often take place independent of church ministers and
congregations” (Goyvaerts & Woude 2020:8; see also Post 2021:90). This
category we recognize in our own South African context, but in a qualified
sense. Private domestic liturgical rituals were often encouraged, but almost
always as connected to what the authors call “embedded domestic liturgy”
(see next category and discussion). In South Africa worship leaders often
encouraged worshippers to augment the online liturgies in which they
participated with a variety of domestic liturgical rituals. A Grounded
Theory analysis of sermons preached during lockdown in South Africa (see
Steyn, Pieterse & Wepener 2020) showed that many sermons encouraged
a practice in which domestic liturgical rituals, as a kind of para-liturgy,
were connected to the online liturgies. These domestic liturgical rituals
were participated in at home during the online liturgy or after or before
the online liturgy, for example liturgical actions at home in which families
were encouraged to build a Lenten scene with rocks and wood in their
living rooms and which was explicitly connected to the Good Friday
liturgy. The typology “private domestic liturgy” should thus be qualified
for the liturgical lockdown praxis in South Africa as a practice that was
not completely makeshift or independent, but deliberately connected to the
liturgy of a congregation.
3.4 Embedded domestic liturgies
In their article Goyvaerts and Woude (2020:9) describe embedded domestic
liturgy as: “virtually connected or embedded domestic liturgy includes the
participation of the faithful connected through the internet. One could say
that the internet extends the sacred space of the church building to the
homes of the faithful.” The category they describe here is what most of
the congregations in mainline affluent churches with members with Wi-Fi
access, or at least enough internet data, in their private homes as well as
8
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
good network connectivity also developed. A platform called “Kieskerk”,9
comparable to the mentioned platform of the Roman Catholic churches in
Cape Town, was also developed where many congregations registered and
made their embedded domestic liturgies available.
Depending on perspective, for example a South African middle-class
Dutch Reformed or Roman Catholic perspective, an observer can easily
make the mistake and take this category of embedded domestic liturgy as
the dominant lockdown liturgy category in South Africa. To Goyvaerts
and Woude’s four insightful categories from the Netherlands, we add a
fifth South African category which we describe as digital textual liturgies,
and which is definitely the largest of the South African lockdown liturgy
categories.10
3.5 Digital textual liturgies
Based on preliminary informal observations and conversations with
ministers and members,11 it soon became clear that, because of a variety of
factors, but mainly economic ones, digital textual liturgies were the main
type of lockdown liturgy in South Africa. What we describe as digital textual
liturgies were liturgies in which a minister or pastor would type an order
of worship, almost always with a message (homily/sermon), also prayers
and references to hymns, and send this text as liturgy via applications
such as WhatsApp or SMS, sometimes also social media platforms such as
Facebook, to members of congregations. The members would then in their
own time engage in a variety of ways with the digital textual liturgy.
These digital textual liturgies are probably not liturgies that can be termed
sacramental worship, but it was telling regarding lockdown liturgy in South
Africa. Sometimes these digital textual liturgies sent via SMS or WhatsApp
9 See the website https://kieskerk.com/
10 In Post’s (2021:105) overview of online liturgies during the pandemic in the Netherlands
this category we add here is also absent.
11 One of the authors of this article also presented Continued Ministerial Development
courses for ministers and congregations on the topic of online liturgy in this period
and participants were encouraged to share their experiences with the presenter. It
very soon became clear that even in more affluent congregations in the countryside,
where they had little internet connectivity or where a minister or congregation was not
comfortable with using technology, digital textual liturgies were used. This category
was thus not restricted to poorer congregations.
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
9
included instructions on how and when to celebrate the Lord’s Supper,
so even if the celebration of this sacrament was probably a peripheral
phenomenon in the overarching category of digital textual liturgies, it is
not excluded from it.
There are at least two sets of reasons why this category was used most often.
Firstly, poverty and the cost of data in combination with poor network
connectivity in some parts of the country, meant that the live streaming
of liturgies were either too expensive or technically impossible. Secondly,
celebrating the Lord’s Supper and other sacraments is for most Christians
not the main issue when it comes to worshipping during a pandemic in
South Africa, but rather the question how an (encouraging) sermon or
message and prayer can be communicated to members.12
4. Three creative tensions
Very few articles were published in the South African media and
the typologies of celebrations we identified during 2020 were largely
comparable to those that were present in the Dutch context; however, for
the largest part of the South African population lockdown, liturgies took
on a different format than it did in the Netherlands, namely digital textual
liturgies – which of course is not surprising for a number of reasons.13 In
the light of our comparison, we now list and discuss three creative tensions
that we think should be explored further in South Africa.14 On the one had
these creative tensions can assist in better understanding why lockdown
liturgies took the form they did in South Africa and on the other hand,
and importantly, they can assist in reimagining the liturgia condenda
12
During 2020 one of the authors of this article presented online courses on liturgy
during which ministers from across South Africa could provide feedback and send in
information regarding their situations pertaining to online liturgy during lockdown.
Some of the information shared here are insights gained from that feedback and
conversations.
13 There are a number of liturgical-historical and empirical studies from the South
African context that can assist in understanding the current liturgical landscape and
why faith communities, theologically speaking, developed lockdown liturgies in the
ways that they did (cf. Barnard 1981; Burger 2003; Wepener, et al 2019).
14 Paul Post (2019 & 2021) also recently explored online ritual and rituals during the
Corona pandemic in which he formulated and explored important notions related to
online liturgy and ritual.
10
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
pertaining to the development of lockdown liturgy specifically and online
liturgy in general as a hermeneutical act.
4.1 Excarnation – Incarnation
Throughout his book Heilige Onrust, Dutch theologian Frits de Lange (2016)
emphasizes the importance of the human body in faith and religion and the
fact that religion is something that humans do with their bodies. However,
during lockdown, human bodies with their five senses were locked in by
walls and what these bodies could physically do, was restricted. Screens,
such as televisions, computer monitors and cell phones locked open the
confined spaces so that bodies could liturgically do something, albeit in a
new way.
In a recent publication Richard Kearney (2021) explores the issue of
excarnation and asks whether humans are losing touch with their senses
as human experience becomes more and more mediated via technology
This is a critical question that online lockdown liturgies should also engage
with. The examples where congregations attempted to augment the online
liturgies with tactile domestic liturgical rituals is a promising sign that
some are already taking this challenge seriously. Kearney (2021:5; see also
Kearney & Treanor 2015) argues, as we do in this article, that technology
can overcome distance, however he adds that it does not always bring
nearness, and this is where the importance of the senses and especially
touch comes in. As we enter deeper into a technological age, the creative
tension between excarnation and incarnation should, also with regard to
online liturgy, always be kept in mind. Kearney (2021:38) writes: “Touch
keeps us susceptible to the world as it commutes, like Hermes, between
inside and outside, self and other, human and nonhuman. Tactility is our
most refined means of transition and translation.”
Lockdown liturgies reminded us on a deep level of the importance of
embodiment in general and touch in particular and Post (2021:109) reminds
us that we must be careful of the opposition of virtual versus physical.
Moving forward, online liturgies will, amongst other things, have to
develop in a direction where whole bodies and all five senses are taken very
seriously, otherwise we will develop bodily and sensory anaemic liturgies.
In the meantime, we can again and anew appreciate the anamnestic
possibilities that liturgy brings, including online lockdown liturgy, as
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
11
spatially restricted bodies were via liturgy in the present, connected to a
specific past, and as such connected to God’s future, but never forgetting
that the Christian liturgies celebrated are anchored in the incarnation of
Jesus Christ and the worshippers (cf. also Wepener & Cilliers 2021).
Cilliers (2009:53) writes as follows about worship and embodiment, which
to our mind is also applicable to the various forms of lockdown liturgies:
God’s (bodily) presence amongst us seems to entail at least two
dimensions, namely divine self-presentation (even divine disclosure)
and human re-presentation. The Spirit has body (or perhaps we
should say: the Spirit is body), and without this body it would be
difficult, if not impossible, to experience God’s presence with us.
The Spirit is God’s embodied accommodation to created reality, and
this can be experienced in and through the church, the latter being
Christ existing in the form of the congregation. God’s embodiment
amongst us is therefore an accommodation to our limitations and
peculiarities, but not an eradication of them.
4.2 Global – local
Worshipping bodies were in lockdown liturgies simultaneously
sociologically rooted in a private space and connected to other worshipping
bodies in a network culture, importantly, however, these bodies, were
theologically rooted in the sacred space of a private confined space and
connected to the ontological reality of the liturgy which is a divine human
encounter. We are convinced that, pastorally speaking, Christians in
South Africa needed lockdown liturgies, including a variety of ways in
which the sacraments were celebrated during lockdown as recent research
in our context pointed towards religious social capital that is generated
by liturgies and rituals in poor communities which included eating and
drinking and water rituals (see Wepener, et al 2019). The South African
context differs fundamentally from that of the Netherlands and the idea
of abstinence and solidarity is largely foreign to our context, as has already
been argued. Sacramental participation and the creation of liturgies
enabling that participation would in our context rather be experienced
12
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
as solidarity.15 The subheading “Global – local” can also read “Between
reacting to liturgical need and unintended ecclesiological consequences.”
Many worshippers in South Africa were financially speaking poor and
unemployed and already struggling to survive even before the Covid-19
virus arrived. At the end of their article Goyvaerts and Woude (2020:16)
remarks that some people in the Netherlands could have focused so much
on making liturgy available, that they could have forgotten diaconia. This
is an important observation. In our view, making liturgy available during
lockdown in South Africa, also online sacramental worship, was of course
leitourgia, but it was as leitourgia also (in service of) kerygma and koinonia,
and as such lockdown liturgy as leitourgia was (also) diaconia (cf. also
Wepener 2012).
On the one hand making lockdown liturgies available to worshippers can
potentially serve in important needs, however, ecclesiologically speaking,
there were and are potentially some unintended consequences to freely
available online liturgies. In non-lockdown times, people largely attend
worship in specific local congregations in South Africa, even though
so-called church hopping is not excluded. Worshippers also often make
their financial, and other contributions, in the local congregations where
they attend worship. In a tradition such as the Reformed tradition, these
contributions are critical for the salary of the minister and others employed
by the congregation, but also community development and diaconical
work of the congregation in their local community and beyond. Spectator
and online lockdown liturgies meant that the phenomenon of church
hopping, or what Goyvaerts and Woude (2020:14) calls “find ‘one’s pick’”,
could increase.16 Often more people, even from overseas, started to attend
liturgies with well-spoken preachers, well thought out orders of worship,
“meaningful” celebrations of the sacraments and especially good music,
for example congregations with especially gifted organists. This liturgical
15
South Africans would probably have appreciation for the abstinence and solidarity
position mentioned by Goyvaerts and Woude, as long as they are not expected to also
abstain.
16 In some cases, members of congregations, because of a variety of reasons, did not
attend any form of lockdown liturgy of their local congregation and concomitantly
also did not make any financial contributions as they usually would during the time of
offerings or collection.
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
13
church hopping had detrimental consequences for some congregations who
did not have the same resources as other congregations at their disposal. In
general, however, and with reference to the digital textual liturgies, this was
not the case and those liturgies and text messages functioned as lifelines.
In lockdown, liturgies locked open those who were locked in. However,
the same liturgies also unlocked some other doors behind which some less
positive and unintended consequences were lurking.
The homiletician Nora Tisdale has done important work on what she calls
“exegeting the congregation” (cf. Tisdale 2008; Troeger & Tisdale 2013).
According to her, preachers should not only do exegesis of the biblical
text that they preach on, but also the congregation, the hearers for whom
they will preach a specific sermon. Tisdale’s advice to do exegesis of a
local congregation and that all people are like all other people, no other
people, and some other people, should be kept in mind when lockdown
liturgies are at stake. Often it is clear that a particular lockdown liturgy
has a very specific local congregation and its members in view and thus
engages with the joys and sorrows of specific people in a local contents,
whilst simultaneously remaining globally connected keeping the larger
social context in mind (cf. Harris 2008). When a specific local congregation
is no longer kept in view and worship leaders and preachers in lockdown
liturgies start to deliberately make their liturgies available and attractive
for a much larger online worshipping “audience”, critical questions should
be asked.
4.3 Prophetic – pastoral
As already mentioned, in South Africa, as elsewhere, the virus reached a
nation in which many people were already facing many challenges. It was
also the time when many people (re-)read Albert Camus’s The Plague. The
priest, Father Paneloux, delivers a sermon at the beginning of the plague
in Oran and another several months later. In his descriptions of the second
sermon Camus informs readers that Father Paneloux’s tone changed, he
spoke softer in the second sermon, and he used “we” instead of “you” (cf.
also Steyn, Pieterse & Wepener 2020).
Nora Tisdale’s (2011) work regarding prophetic preaching in a pastoral
tone, can be valuable when developing lockdown liturgies in trying times.
Some of her homiletical wisdom includes that truth should always be
14
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
spoken in love; preachers should stand in the shoes of another and view
the world from a different perspective; and that preachers should stand
with the congregation and not opposite the congregation. When this is
the mode of preaching, prophetic means pastoral and pastoral becomes
prophetic and sacramental worship and my hermeneutical understanding
of what should and what should not liturgically and sacramentally happen
during lockdown, is informed by the prophetic-pastoral creative tension.
To our mind, and in a South African lockdown context, it will entail that
the Lord’s Supper is celebrated as far as possible via lockdown liturgies as
a prophetic-pastoral act.
Cilliers (2016:115–116) writes as follows about this paradox:
This theology and consequently preaching of affirmation is
not innocuous; on the contrary, it protests against any form of
destructive ideology or so-called eternalized systems that refuse to
believe that God has no, or no longer has any, compassion with this
world. Preaching Promise as affirmation within the paradoxes of life
is to say that this universe is not cold and empty; not without the
compassion of a faithful God. It is to unmask all powers and notions
and movements and ideologies that destroy the dignity and identity
of humans as humans. In this sense, preaching God’s Promise as
affirmation is not simply saying no!; it is rather saying yes! – because
God is continuously saying Yes! to this world and its peoples.
5. Conclusion
In Shakespeare’s last play, The Tempest, Gonzalo remarks: “My dear Lord,
the truth you speak doth lack some gentleness and time to speak it in, you
rub the sore, when you should bring the plaster.” Truth is a hermeneutical
reality, as the Gospel of John reminds us in the Farewell Discourse (cf.
Wepener 2014:79–88), also liturgical truth in which the Spirit leads worship
planners and leaders. However, the liturgical truth for Dutch worshippers
and the truth for the South African worshippers pertaining to the praxis
of lockdown liturgies and sacramental worship will thus most probably
not be the exact same truth. A Dutch sermon preached in the Netherlands
during lockdown can impossibly be the same sermon preached in South
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
15
Africa during the same time. Lockdown liturgies and online sacramental
celebrations will thus, to our mind, remain an ongoing hermeneutical
challenge and we suggest that the creative tensions discussed in this article
can assist those responsible with the development of these celebrations to
“time grace” in their own contexts.
For this, there exists no recipe, or quick-fix methodology. It calls for
daring, indeed for being unsettled, for becoming fluid and flexible –
to move. Perhaps timing could be called the “art of improvisation”.
Timing in fact hinges on improvisation … Timing implies the ability
to juggle more than one ball in the air, knowing when to catch, and
when to release, to keep the “circular movement” going. (Cilliers
2019:26).
The art of timing, i.e. improvisation does not negate the knowledge
of (liturgical) structures and traditions – on the contrary: you can
only improvise if you have, at least to a certain extent, mastered the
fundamentals of liturgy. But only repeating these fundamentals speaks of
a lack of wisdom, indeed of a need of discernment. We need to time the
moment, and to improvise the liturgy that fits into this moment – in South
Africa, the Netherlands, and elsewhere. This can indeed be unsettling.
But, because it is the timing of grace, it is also liberating, beyond words.
Post (2021:113), with reference to Stephen O’Leary, aptly writes that online
culture is an invitation to rethink our concepts and approaches to ritual
(also liturgy) in our study thereof, otherwise we will keep on seeing online
worship as not the real thing.
Bibliography
Asala, K. 2021. Church Doors are Closed But Religious Hearts are Still
Open. Africanews. [Online]. Available: https://www.africanews.
com/2021/01/15/the-pandemic-sees-south-african-churchgoers-turnto-online-sermons/
Barnard, A.C. 1981. Die Erediens. Pretoria: NGKB Transvaal.
Barnard, M., J.H. Cilliers & C.J. Wepener 2014. Worship in a network
culture. Liturgia Condenda 23. Leuven: Peeters Pers.
16
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
Burger, C.W. 2003. Reformed Liturgy in the South African Context. In
Vischer, L. (ed.). Christian Worship in Reformed Churches Past and
Present. Grand Rapids/Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company. 159–174.
Carvalhaes, C. 2021. Praying with every heart. Orienting our lives to the
wholeness of the world. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
Carvalhaes, C. 2020. Liturgies from below. 462 acts of worship. Nashville,
TN: Abingdon Press.
Cilliers. J. 2019. Timing grace. Stellenbosch. SUN Press.
Cilliers, J. 2016. Preaching between affirmation and anticipation: contours
of a paradoxical homiletic. Stellenbosch Theological Journal, 2(1):109–
130.
Cilliers, J. 2009. Fides quaerens corporalitatem: perspectives on liturgical
embodiment. Verbum et Ecclesia 30(1):50–64.
De Kock, C. 2020. Tant Sannie van die Overberg vier toe haar eie
Nagmaal … Netwerk24. [Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.
com/Stemme/Profiele/tant-sarie-van-die-overberg-vier-toe-haar-eienagmaal-20200410
De Lange, F. 2016. Heilige Onrust. Een Plegrimage Naar Het Hart Van
Religie. Utrecht: Ten Have.
Goyvaerts, S. & F. Woude 2020. Dutch Responses to Lockdown Liturgies.
Analysis of the Public Debate on Sacraments During the COVID-19
Pandemic. Yearbook for Ritual and Liturgical Studies, 36(2020):3–17.
Geyling, A. 2020. Aanlyn eredienste: Hoe en hoekom ons die liggaam
moet betrek. Kerkbode. [Online]. Available: https://kerkbode.
christians.co.za/2020/07/31/digitale-eredienste-hoe-en-hoekom-onsdie-liggaam-moet-betrek/
Kearney, R. 2021. Touch. Recovering our most vital sense. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Kearney, R. & B. Treanor (eds.) 2015. Carnal hermeneutics. New York:
Fordham University Press.
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
17
La Vita, M. 2020. Profiel: ’n Boodskap aan jou wat ingekerker is.
Netwerk24. [Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.com/Stemme/
Profiele/n-boodskap-aan-jou-wat-ingekerker-is-20200409
Marx, J. & M. Lawrence. Só regaeer kerke op koronavirus. Netwerk24.
[Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.com/Nuus/Algemeen/soreageer-kerke-op-koronavirus-20200316
Monama, T. 2020. Religions get tech savvy. The Star. [Online]. Available:
https://www.pressreader.com/south-africa/the-star-south-africaearly-edition/20200505/281646782305196
Msibi, N. 2020. Covid-19 and the disruption of the Church. News24.
[Online]. Available: https://www.news24.com/news24/Columnists/
GuestColumn/opinion-covid-19-and-the-disruption-of-thechurch-20200520
Post, P. 2021. Rituelen, theorie en praktijk in kort bestek. Almere:
Uitgeverij Parthenon.
Post, P. 2019. @Ritual: Contested and Inauthentic. In Post, P. & M.
Hoondert (eds.). Absent Ritual. Exploring the Ambivalence and
Dynamics of Ritual. Durham, NC: Carlina Academic Press, 205–215.
Rossouw, J. 2020. Nagmaal is nie sommer net enige ritueel nie. Volksblad.
[Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.com/Stemme/Aktueel/
nagmaal-is-nie-sommer-net-enige-ritueel-nie-20200324
Schoeman, W.J. 2013. South African religious demography: The 2013
General Household Survey. HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological
Studies 73(2):1–7.
Scholtz, L. 2020. Gelowges woeker aanlyn. Kerkbode. [Online]. Available:
https://kerkbode.christians.co.za/2020/03/23/gelowiges-woekeraanlyn/
Smith, D. 2020. Digi-dienste, stromings, opnames om Nagmaal te
vier. Netwerk24. [Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.com/
Nuus/Algemeen/digi-dienste-stroming-opnames-om-nagmaal-tevier-20200407
18
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
Sonjica, N. 2020. Let’s bow our heads and Zoom: Virtual communion
takes over as churches battle with Covid restrictions. TimesLive
(Sunday Times). [Online]. Available: https://www.timeslive.co.za/
news/south-africa/2020-12-18-lets-bow-our-heads-and-zoom-virtualcommunion-takes-over-as-churches-battle-with-covid-restrictions/
Steyn, M; C. Wepener & H. Pieterse 2020. Preaching during the
COVID-19 Pandemic in South Africa: A Grounded Theoretical
exploration (Prediking ten tyde van die COVID-19-pandemie: ‘n
Gegronde teoretiese verkenning). International Journal of Homiletics.
4:1–21.
Steyn, M. & C. Wepener 2021. Pandemic, Preaching and Progression: a
grounded theory exploration and homiletical praxis theory. In Nell,
I. (ed.). COVID-19 in Congregations and Communities. An exploration
of the influence of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Congregational and
Community Life. Cape Town: Naledi. 51–74.
Tisdale, L.T. 2011. Prophetic preaching. A pastoral approach. Louisville,
KY: WJK.
Tisdale, L.T. 2008. Exegeting the congregation. In Long, T.G. & L.T.
Tisdale. Teaching Preaching as a Christian Practice. A New Approach
to Homiletical Pedagogy. Louisville, KY: WJK, 75–89.
Troeger, T & L. Tisdale 2013. Exegeting the congregation for preaching.
In Troeger, T & L. Tisdale. A sermon workbook. Nashville: Abingdon.
56–65.
Wepener, C. 2020. ’n Pandemie se oopgelate kring. Vrye Weekblad.
[Online]. Available: https://www.vryeweekblad.com/menings-endebat/2020-06-04-n-pandemie-se-oopgelate-kring/
Wepener, C. 2014. Van voor die wieg tot na die graf. Rituele roetemerkers
vir die drumpels van die lewe. Wellington: Bybelkor.
Wepener, C.J. 2012. Wat maak ’n kerkorrel gereformeerd? ’n Verkenning
van Afrikaanse “gereformeerde” musiek in die jare 1980 en 1990
in Suid-Afrika. Verbum et Ecclesia, 33(1), Art. #709, 8 pages. http://
dx.doi.org/10.4102/ve.v33i1.709
Wepener & Cilliers • STJ 2022, Vol 8, No 2, 1–19
19
Wepener, C.J. 2008. Towards a missional liturgy. NGTT 49(1&2):206–219.
Wepener, C.; Swart, I; Ter Haar, G & M. Barnard (eds.) 2019. Bonding
in worship. A ritual lens on social capital formation in African
Independent Churches in South Africa. Liturgia Condenda 30. Peeters
Press, Leuven.
Wepener, C. & J. Cilliers 2021. Lockdown liturgy in a network culture.
A ritual-liturgical exploration of embodiment and place. In Nell, I.
(ed.). COVID-19 in Congregations and Communities. An exploration
of the influence of the Coronavirus Pandemic on Congregational and
Community Life. Cape Town: Naledi. 30–50.
Wepener, C. & N. Matthee 2020a. Kubernagmaal in virustyd. Netwerk24.
[Online]. Available: https://www.netwerk24.com/Stemme/Menings/
kubernagmaal-in-virustyd-20200317
Wepener, C. & N. Matthee 2020b. Kuberbegraafplase- en pelgrimstogte in
die tyd van corona. Vrye Weekblad. [Online]. Available: https://www.
vryeweekblad.com/menings-en-debat/2020-03-26-kuberbegraafplaseen-pelgrimstogte-in-die-tyd-van-corona/; [Online]. Available: https://
adct.org.za/ongoing-live-streamed-masses-and-devotions-in-thearchdiocese-of-cape-town/; [Online]. Available: https://kieskerk.com/