Vol. 189, No. 4S, Supplement, Sunday, May 5, 2013
THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY姞
e249
pathologically proven tumor other than RCC and 50 patients with
metastasis, 1,091 patients with a mean age of 54 years were finally
included in the analysis. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, and other
types of RCC occurred in 962 (88.8%), 80 (7.4%), 31 (2.9%), and 10
(0.8%), respectively, of the 1,091 study patients (Table). PDGFR-
expression was the highest in clear cell RCC, however VEGF and
PDGF- expression was the highest in papillary RCC. VEGF staining
showed higher expression with the increasing T or N stage. After
adjusting the T stage and Furhman nuclear grade using multivariate
logistic regression analysis, papillary RCC showed significantly stronger expression of VEGF (OR⫽3.57, 95% CI 1.74 –7.32, p⬍0.001),
VEGFR2 (OR⫽1.82, 95% CI 1.11–2.99, p⫽0.017), and PDGF-
(OR⫽2.46, 95% CI 1.49 – 4.06, p⫽0.019) compared to clear cell RCC.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large series of immunohistochemical
assay, we demonstrated different cytoplasmic expression of VEGF,
VEGFR2, PDGF-, and PDGFR- in tumor cell according to the
pathologic stage and the cell type of RCC. It is noteworthy that VEGF
and PDGF- expression was the highest in papillary RCC, not in clear
cell RCC.
P value
Strong PDGFR
Weak PDGFR
P value
Strong PDGF
Weak PDGF
P value
Strong VEGFR2
Weak VEGFR2
Weak
VEGF
P value
Strong VEGF
Table VEGF, VEGFR2, PDGF-, PDGFR- expression according to cell types
Cell type,
n (%)
0.166
⬍0.001
0.002
⬍0.001
340
622
532
430
747
215
646
316
(35.3)
(34.7)
(55.3)
(44.7)
(77.7)
(22.3)
(67.2)
(32.8)
9
71
34
46
44
36
58
22
Papillary
(11.3)
(88.8)
(42.5)
(54.5)
(55.0)
(45.0)
(72.5)
(27.5)
14
17
16
15
22
9
28
3
Chromophobe
(45.2)
(54.8)
(51.6)
(48.4)
(71.0)
(29.0)
(90.3)
(9.7)
1
9
5
5
8
2
10
0
Others
(10.0)
(90.0)
(50.0)
(50.0)
(80.0)
(20.0)
(100.0)
(0.0)
Clear cell
VEGF⫽vascular endothelial cell growth factor; VEGFR2⫽vascular endothelial
cell growth factor receptor 2; PDGF-;⫽platelet-derived growth factor-; PDGFR⫽platelet-derived growth factor- receptor
Source of Funding: none
Source of Funding: none
609
VEGF/VEGFR2 OR PDGF-/PDGFR- EXPRESSION IN
NON-METASTATIC, RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: A
PROSPECTIVE STUDY WITH 1,091 CONSECUTIVE CASES
Sang Hoon Song*, In Gab Jeong, Dalsan You, Jun Hyuk Hong,
Bum Sik Hong, Cheryn Song, Seoul, Korea, Republic of;
Jae Young Joung, New Brunswick, NJ; Kyung Hyun Moon, Ulsan,
Korea, Republic of; Young Mi Cho, Hanjong Ahn, Choung-Soo Kim,
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated the correlation between the expression of the vascular endothelial cell growth
factor (VEGF), the platelet-derived growth factor- (PDGF-), their
receptors (VEGFR2, PDGFR-), and the pathologic stage or cell type
in non-metastatic, renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
METHODS: A prospective, observational study was conducted
to assess the VEGF, VEGFR2, PDGF-, and PDGFR- protein expression by immunohistochemical assay in tumor tissue samples obtained from surgical specimens after radical or partial nephrectomy
performed at our center between January 2008 and March 2012. The
intensity of these proteins were quantified by a single pathologist and
rated on a scale of 0 to 3. We dichotomized the expression level as
weak (scale 0-1) or strong (scale 2-3). The correlation between the
expression of these proteins and the oncologic parameters, especially
the pathologic classification according to the cell type of RCC, was
analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 1,423 patients diagnosed with RCC underwent surgery during the study period. Excluding 292 patients with
610
DEVELOPMENT OF A TEST FOR RCC BY DETECTION OF VHL
MUTATIONS IN TISSUE AND FLUIDS OF PATIENTS WITH
RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
Shilpa Sreedharan*, Rebecca S Arnold, Kimberly Kerley,
Kristina B Mercer, Kerry Ressler, Viraj A Master, Kenneth Ogan,
David L Roberts, John G Pattaras, John A Petros, Atlanta, GA
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery is the only
highly effective therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and there is no
effective screening or blood test for RCC. Somatic changes in the von
Hippel-Lindau gene (VHL) are found in approximately 80% of clear cell
RCC. Cancer cells and/or DNA may be recovered from body fluids of
patients with RCC in nearly every case. The objective of this research
is to develop a blood and/or urine test for RCC based upon the
detection of small amounts of circulating tumor DNA characterized by
the somatic mutations in VHL.
METHODS: DNA from archived patient tissue and fluids was
used to compile a panel of acquired VHL polymorphisms for use in a
diagnostic urine or serum test identifying circulating RCC cells. The
sensitivities of methods capable of such identification were contrasted
to more easily detect mutations present in early stages of RCC at a time
when they can be surgically cured. DNA from 50 archived renal cancer
patient tissue, serum, and urine was purified, amplified, and sequenced
using an ABI3100 DNA Sequencer. The mutations detected were
confirmed with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), when
possible. The sensitivity of RFLP was contrasted with Sequenom’s©
ability to detect minute amounts of mutated DNA in urine and serum via
a single base extension reaction and mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: Sequencing of VHL revealed the presence of mutations which subsequently created alterations in restriction enzyme
e250
THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY姞
digestion. After analysis of the commonly mutated exon regions of VHL
for 50 patients, 78% were found to have mutations. 17% of those
mutations occurred in multiple patients. DNA from serum and/or urine
from these patients was then examined for the identified mutations.
27% of patients had mutations detected in the DNA purified from their
serum and/or urine. Contrasting the sensitivity of mutation detection via
RFLP of body fluids versus detection via Sequenom indicated that
Sequenom was able to identify mutations present in DNA as dilute as
0.05ng, compared to 12.5ng DNA required for RFLP detection.
CONCLUSIONS: A panel of the most highly observed VHL
polymorphism DNA biomarkers is a potential diagnostic tool for the
detection of early stage RCC. High-throughput identification methods of
such mutations, such as mass spectrometry, have an increased sensitivity and specificity compared to PCR/RFLP analysis and would
therefore better translate into clinical application. VHL mutations identified in DNA purified from patient urine or serum via RFLP and mass
spectrometry support the feasibility of developing such a test.
Source of Funding: Institutional
611
MICRORNA AS NOVEL BLOOD-BASED BIOMARKERS IN CLEAR
CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
A Ari Hakimi*, Anders Jacobsen, Nina Mikkilineni, Brandon Fiegoli,
Sara Blass, Yevgeniy Grigoryev, Agnes Viale, Nicholas Socci,
Martin H Voss, Robert Motzer, Victor E Reuter, Jonathan Coleman,
Paul Russo, James J Hsieh, New York, NY
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: MicroRNAs (miRNA) are
short, non-coding RNAs involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation. Several reports have assessed their role as blood based biomarkers given their tissue and cancer-specific expression. Using an integrative approach we sequenced the miRNA transcriptome of the plasma of
several clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients both before
and after surgery as well as several controls.
METHODS: We performed next generation miRNA sequencing
(miRNAseq) on eight pairs (pre and postoperative plasma samples)
and four non-cancer controls to identify potential biomarker candidates.
We further integrated our data with the miRNAseq tumor data from the
Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study to determine whether plasma
miRNA levels are representative of tumor miRNA expression in ccRCC.
RESULTS: Overall, 930 unique miRNAs were detected, including 272 at greater than 10 read counts. There was a global shift of
miRNA expression toward the non-cancer controls in the postoperative
samples compared to preoperative. We further identified several stably
expressed miRNAs across all samples and controls including miR-16,
miR-191, and miR-103. We also identified several potential biomarker
candidates by looking at differential expression both in terms of preoperative and postoperative status, as well as tumor vs control including
miR-378 and miR-660. Intriguingly, the plasma miRNA expression
patterns showed no relationship to the tumor expression patterns using
the TCGA samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Plasma miRNA expression patterns are consistently altered in ccRCC and, following surgery, globally revert to the
non-cancerous levels of the controls. Several biomarker candidates
have been identified and a panel is undergoing validation in a larger
cohort. Plasma miRNA levels do not appear to reflect tumor levels in
ccRCC.
Source of Funding: Funding Sources: This work has been
supported by the Paula Moss Trust for the research into the
cure and treatment of kidney cancer (Hsieh), the Sidney
Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, by funds
provided by David H. Koch through the Prostate Cancer
Foundation, the National Cancer Institute T32 CA082088-12
training grant (Hakimi), and the Stephen P Hanson Family Fund
Fellowship in Kidney Cancer (Hakimi).
Vol. 189, No. 4S, Supplement, Sunday, May 5, 2013
612
PD-0332991, AN INHIBITOR OF CYCLIN-DEPENDENT KINASE
4/6, DEMONSTRATES INHIBITION OF PROLIFERATION IN
RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AT NANOMOLAR
CONCENTRATIONS AND MOLECULAR MARKERS PREDICT
FOR SENSITIVITY
Joshua Logan*, Nikayeh Mostofizadeh, Amrita Desai, Erika von Euw,
Dylan Conklin, Veerauo Konkankit, Habib Hamidi, Mark Eckardt,
Lee Anderson, Hsiao-Wang Chen, Charles Ginther,
Eileen Taschereau, Los Angeles, CA; James Christensen, La Jolla,
CA; Arie Belldegrun, Dennis Slamon, Fairooz Kabbinaar, Los
Angeles, CA
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cell cycle dysregulation
is a fundamental trait in cancer biology as evidenced by its prevalence
in multiple malignancies, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
PD-0332991 is an orally active, potent, and selective inhibitor of
cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6, blocking retinoblastoma (Rb)
phosphorylation in nanomolar concentrations.
We evaluated PD-0332991 in multiple renal cell lines to determine its effects on proliferation, phosphorylation of Rb, cell cycle and
apoptosis. Lastly, we evaluated the response to drug for associations
with copy number alterations and variances in transcript expression to
identify potential molecular markers of response.
METHODS: A panel of 28 RCC and immortalized kidney cell
lines were used to examine the effects of PD-0332991 on proliferation
to determine the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values.
The effects of PD-0332991 on cell-cycle, apoptosis, and Rb phosphorylation were also assessed with flow cytometry and western blot
analysis for five of the cell lines: RCC-HB and SW 156 (sensitive and
malignant), R444 and Hs 891.T (resistant and malignant) and CCD
1103 (resistant and immortalized non-malignant). Molecular markers
for response prediction, including p16, p15, CCND1, CCNE1, E2F1,
Rb, CDK4 and CDK6, were studied using array CGH and gene expression profiling.
RESULTS: A concentration-dependent inhibition of proliferation
was identified; IC50 values ranged from 25.0nM up to 700nM, and five
cell lines were completely resistant at 1000nM. CDK4/6 inhibition with
PD-0332991 demonstrated G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, as well as induction
of late apoptosis in SW 156, and Rb phosphorylation was blocked in a
time-dependent fashion in both sensitive cell lines. Genotype and
expression data of CDKN2A and CDKN2B were combined and a
consensus was made regarding the status of p16 and p15, a significant
association between loss and sensitivity to PD-0332991 was identified
for p16 (p⫽0.027). No other copy number alterations were identified by
array CGH in the other genes. Cell lines were then classified as having
“high” or “low” expression for each of these markers; E2F1 was the only
gene identified with expression levels significantly associated with
response to PD-0332991 (p⫽0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: PD-0332991 shows promising anti-proliferative activity in RCC through blockade of cell cycle progression. The
decreased expression of select molecular markers p16 and E2F1
predict for sensitivity to PD-0332991 in RCC.
Source of Funding: None
613
VALIDATION AND CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS OF RECENTLY
REPORTED RCC SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI:
A Ari Hakimi*, Irina Ostrovnaya, Kelly Stratton, James J Hsieh,
Jonathan Coleman, Paul Russo, Robert J Klein, New York, NY
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: There have been several recent reports of RCC susceptibility loci from large genome wide
association studies. To date there has been no analysis of the effect of
these loci on clinical characteristics of RCC patients.
METHODS: We identified six SNPs previously associated with
kidney cancer using the NHGRI GWAS database; of these, five are
either on the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 genotyping platform or are well tagged