Intensive Care Med (1995) 21:522-536
9 Springer-Verlag 1995
A.
G.
G.
G.
Rossi
Polese
Brandi
Conti
Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure
(PEEPi)
Received: 16 April 1993
Accepted: 25 April 1994
Supported by the National Research
Council and the Ministry of Education
(Special Project on Respiratory
Pathophysiology), Rome, Italy, and by
Grant no. 407 from Theleton, Rome, Italy
A. Rossi (E~)
Fisiopatologia Respiratoria,
Divisione di Pneumologia,
Ospedale Maggiore di Borgo Trento,
Piazzale Stefani 1,
1-37126 Verona, Italy
G. Polese
Servizio Pneumofisiologico,
Verona, Italy
G. Brandi
Institute of Human Physiology,
University of Padova, Padova, Italy
G. Conti
Institute of Anaesthesia
and Intensive Care,
University "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
Introduction
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is one of the
most frequently discussed topics in critical care medicine.
However, alveolar pressure can remain positive throughout expiration without P E E P set by the ventilator whenever the time available to breathe out is shorter than the
time required to decompress the lungs to the elastic
equilibrium volume of the total respiratory system (Vr).
The end-expiratory elastic recoil (Pel,rs) due to incomplete expiration has been termed auto PEEP, occult
P E E P [1], inadvertent P E E P [2], endogenous PEEP, in-
ternal P E E P and intrinsic P E E P [3, 4] owing to its similarity and contrast with PEEP set by the ventilator.
The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the studies on this interesting aspect of critical care medicine, from the underlying physiological
mechanism(s) to the clinical and therapeutic implications,
through measurement and monitoring in the intensive
care setting.
Physiology
The physiological mechanisms leading to intrinsic P E E P
are closely related to factors determining the end-expiratory lung volume and the rate of lung emptying.
The functional residual capacity (FRC) is defined as
the amount of gas in the lungs and the airways at the end
of expiration [5]. In normal subjects, during tidal breathing, the elastic energy stored in the respiratory system
during the preceding inspiration is sufficient for an expiration and FRC is determined by the opposing elastic
forces of the lungs and the chest wall, Under such circumstances, expiratory flow becomes nil, and remains nil for
an appreciable time (i. e. the end-expiratory pause) before
the onset of the next inspiration: FRC corresponds to the
elastic equilibrium volume of the total respiratory system
( F r). Pulmonary hyperinflation defines an increase in
FRC above predicted values. Pulmonary hyperinflation
can be due, for example, to loss of lung elastic recoil and
airway closure at higher volumes. Dynamic pulmonary
hyperinflation (DPH) defines an increase in FRC above
F r due to the presence of dynamic forces at the end of
expiration: (a) increased flow resistance (and expiratory
flow limitation); (b) short expiratory duration; and (c) increased post-inspiratory inspiratory muscle activity [6, 7].
Abnormally increased flow resistance, often associated
with expiratory flow limitation, is by far the major mechanism leading to D P H in mechanically ventilated patients
and in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in
523
general. In addition, short expiratory time (TE) can be an
important mechanism of D P H in conditions such as inverse ratio ventilation and spontaneous rapid shallow
breathing. Intrinsic P E E P (PEEPi) is a systematic corollary of D P H , reflecting the end-expiratory Pel,rs (Fig. 1)
[2, 71.
1.5
1.0
0.5
~
~
~_
o
-o.5
-1.0
-1.5
Internal and external factors causing D P H and P E E P i
Basically, three factors cause P E E P i and determine its
magnitude in mechanically ventilated patients and during
weaning: (a) the patient's respiratory mechanics (respiratory system resistance and compliance); (b) added
resistance (endotracheal tube and ventilator tubing and
devices); and (c) ventilatory pattern (due to the ventilator
setting, the patient ventilatory demand or a combination
of both). For the purpose of this article, patient's respiratory mechanics and breathing pattern are classified as internal factors, whereas added resistance and ventilator
settings are referred to as external factors (Table 1). In
most instances, internal and external factors are related
and synergetic in causing PEEPi and determining its
magnitude,
Another factor that promotes PEEPi is the end-inspiratory pause (in general, < 0.4 s) c o m m o n l y used in the
ICU to improve gas exchange [8]. It should be noted,
however, that the end-inspiratory pause causes not only
an increase in inspiratory time, and hence a decrease in
TE at a given frequency, but also a decrease in the pressure available to produce expiratory flow. During the
pause there is a decrease in Pel,rs, the driving pressure for
expiration [9].
F l o w resistance
The mechanism by which abnormally increased flow resistance causes D P H is self-evident. Excessive flow resistance actually delays the rate of lung emptying such that
expiration cannot be completed within the time actually
available for breathing out. Under such circumstances, inspiration (or mechanical lung inflation) starts before full
decompression of the lungs, and FRC stabilises above
V r. The usual end-expiratory pause is then replaced by a
change in flow direction, from expiration to inspiration
(Fig. 2).
In mechanically ventilated patients and during weaning, total flow resistance is given by: (a) airway and respiratory tissue resistance, (b) added resistance of fine-bore
endotracheal tube (ETT), and (c) ventilator tubing, circuits and devices. It has been shown that E T T resistance
in vivo is further increased by compression and kinking
of the tube as well as by secretions in the lumen [10, 11,
121.
0
2
4
6
0
2
4
6
0
2
4
6
10
12
14
16
8
10
12
14
16
8
10
12
14
16
1.0
o.8
~0~ o.6
E
0.4
0.2
0
6o
5o
40'
~
z
E
&
~
a_
30
20
10
0
Time (s)
Fig. 1 Representative record with measurement of PEEP i by endexpiratory airway occlusion EEO in a mechanically ventilated patient with acute exacerbation of COPD during controlled ventilation with constant inspiratory flow. Top to bottom: records of flow,
volume, and pressure at the airway opening Pao' Inspiration is upward. The continuous line in the upper panel indicates zero flow.
The first mechanical inflation is regular, namely without EEO: endexpiratory pressure is apparently atmospheric. In contrast, at the
end of the second tidal expiration, the expiratory circuit of the
900 C Siemens ventilator is occluded using the end-expiratory hold
button of the ventilator and Pao becomes positive, reflecting the
end-expiratory elastic recoil of the respiratory system due to incomplete expiration. The value of PEEP i is provided by the difference
between the EEO Pao plateau and atmospheric pressure. Visual detection of the plateau on Pao provides direct evidence of absence of
leaks in the circuit, respiratory muscle relaxation, and equilibration
between alveolar and tracheal pressure
Table
1 Determinants of DPH and PEEP (T1 inspiratory time,
Tro T total time)
Internal
External
Respiratory mechanics
Added flow resistance
Flow resistance
Expiratory flow limitation
Respiratory system compliance
Fine bore endotracheal tube
Ventilator tubing and devices
Breathing pattern
Frequency
I:E
Inflation volume
End-inspiratory pause
Frequency of breathing
TI/TroT
Tidal volume
Ventilator setting
524
F,ow
(I/s)
V
insp,
I
Volume
muscles. Finally, as will be further discussed, application
of moderate levels of PEEP will not increase lung volume
until a "critical" value, somewhat lower than PEEP i has
been exceeded [17, 22].
Respiratory compliance
(I)
Pao
(cm H20 )
Time (s)
' is I
Fig. 2 Top to bottom, records of flow, volume, and Pao in a mechanically ventilated patient during inverse ratio ventilation. There
is no end-expiratory pause, but the end-expiratory flow is suddenly
cut by the onset of the mechanical lung inflation, indicating that expiration was not completed and that the end-expiratory tidal volume was above the elastic equilibrium volume (dynamic pulmonary
hyperinflation, DPH). Inspiratory flow is preceded by the onset of
the positive pressure swing delivered by the ventilator. At zero flow,
i.e. the beginning of inspiration, Pao is already positive, i.e.
3 cmH20. This pressure was needed to counterbalance part of the
end-expiratory elastic recoil in order to start inspiration and corresponds to dynamic intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi,dyn)
Increased airway resistance and expiratory flow limitation
are not the only 'intrinsic' mechanisms causing 'occult'
PEEP. Respiratory compliance must also be taken into
account. In patients well adapted to the ventilator, the respiratory muscles are relaxed throughout most of the ventilatory cycle and the elastic recoil stored in the respiratory system (Pel,rs) during the preceding inspiration provides the pressure driving expiratory flow. Total flow resistance is the opposing force.
Low compliance increases the expiratory driving pressure and hence the rate of lung emptying. This explains
why mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary
oedema or adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
have low levels of DPH and PEEPi in general, although
total flow resistance has been found to be abnormally
high, particularly in the early stages [11, 23, 24]. It has
not yet been documented or sufficiently clarified whether
expiratory flow limitation can also exist in critically ill patients without COPD.
Expiratory flow limitation
In patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD), increased flow resistance due to the inflammatory process in the bronchial wall, mucus in the
lumen and bronchospasm is not the only cause of retarded expiration. The destruction of lung parenchyma
causes loss of alveolar septa (attachments) which support
the small airways [13], while excessive pulmonary hyperinflation can determine positive pleural pressure throughout expiration [2, 10, 14]. Under such circumstances,
poorly supported small airways are dynamically compressed during expiration, giving rise to expiratory flow
limitation [14-191. At its extreme, dynamic compression
of the airways becomes airway closure. Air trapping, a
well recognised event in advanced COPD, is the result of
both the closure of small airways and the abnormally low
expiratory flows through compressed airways.
DPH is mainly determined by expiratory flow limitation in COPD patients, which has important implications
for treatment. First, after the very beginning of expiration, expiratory flow is extremely slow and the time required for a complete expiration can be abnormally long.
For example, in some patients with acute exacerbation of
COPD, 2 0 - 30 s of relaxed expiration was not sufficient
to reach an end-expiratory pause [14, 20, 21]. Second, expiratory flow cannot be increased by application of positive pressure on the chest wall or of negative pressure at
the mouth, or by contraction of abdominal (expiratory)
Ventilator setting
While the terms 'occult' and 'inadvertent' PEEP stress
clinical implications due to the lack of recognition of
PEEP i, the therms 'intrinsic' and 'auto' PEEP stress the
role of patient respiratory mechanics in determining DPH
and PEEP i. However, the role played by 'extrinsic' factors should also be emphasised. The magnitude of
PEEP i also depends on: (a) the amount of volume to be
exhaled, and (b) expiratory time, determined by (i) the
ventilator frequency setting and (ii) the I : E ratio (Table 1). Ventilatory variables become internal factors when
the patient is controlling the breathing pattern, as may be
the case not only during weaning, but also during assisted
ventilation.
PEEPi and ventilatory modes
To some extent, the presence and magnitude of DPH and
PEEP i are influenced by the ventilatory mode. In particular, the difference between controlled and assisted
modes can be important.
525
P E E P i a n d controlled ventilation
Most measurements of PEEPi reported in the literature
were obtained during controlled ventilation. In Table 2,
we report the range and prevalence of PEEPi in a nonselected consecutive series of patients during controlled
ventilation with the same ventilator setting (e. g. VT =
1 2 - 1 0 ml/kg, f = 1 2 - 1 5 breaths/min, I : E = 1 : 2 - 3 )
from some of our previous publications [10, 20, 23, 25].
As predicted, the highest values of P E E P i were found
in patients with airway diseases, particularly COPD patients, in whom D P H and P E E P i were essentially caused
by expiratory flow limitation. P E E P i can be significantly
reduced by changing the ventilatory setting, but will never
totally disappear. P E E P i has also been systematically
found, albeit at low levels, in stable COPD [26-30] and
cystic fibrosis (CF) [31] patients. In patients without
chronic airway disease, external factors such as endotracheal and ventilator tubes, exhalation valves and the
ventilator setting can play an important role in determining both the presence and the magnitude of P E E P i [23,
25]. In this connection, the high prevalence of PEEPi reported in patients with polytrauma, namely 28/50 patients (56%), in whom intrinsic factors such as high ventilatory demand were also probably involved, is noteworthy [32].
P E E P i a n d inverse ratio ventilation
A clear example of D P H and PEEPi entirely caused by
the ventilator setting may be seen during inverse ratio ventilation (IRV). This is a particular form of controlled ventilation, which is generally pressure controlled (PC-IRV),
with a longer inspiratory phase than usual followed by a
short expiration [33-37]. IRV is sometimes used in patients with severe hypoxaemia and respiratory failure, often after conventional CV has failed to maintain a satisfactory PaO2 [33]. P E E P i is present during IRV as an
"occult P E E P " because of incomplete expiration (Fig. 2).
The presence of P E E P i can explain the improvement in
PaO2 observed in patients on IRV and the sometimes unexpected drop in cardiac output (CO) [34]. Not surprisingly, less P E E P than during CV is required to increase
PaO2 during IRV since a certain amount of P E E P i is already present [37]. In addition, the conclusion that IRV
decreases the risk of barotrauma because of the lower
peak cycling pressure is questionable. It is true that alveolar pressure and mean airway pressure (MAP) may be
much higher than expected due to DPH, and hence the
risk of barotrauma is unchanged if not increased. The
lower peak cycling pressure observed during IRV than
during CV is the result of the lower resistive pressure drop
due to the generally slower end-inspiratory flow, while the
end-inspiratory alveolar pressure will approximate the
level occurring with a similar amount of P E E P [36].
Table 2 Magnitude and prevalence of PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients (PEEP i intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure
(cmH20), COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CF
cystic fibrosis, ARDS adult respiratory distress syndrome, CPO
cardiogenic pulmonary oedema, Other patients with ARF of extrapulmonary origin
Diagnosis
No.
PEEP i (range)
Prevalence
COPD
CF
Asthma
ARDS
CPE
Other
45
1
3
28
10
10
2.6 - 22
11
13.5-20
1.0-8.1
1.0-6.0
1.0-4.1
45/45
1/1
3/3
t5/28
8/10
5/10
(100%)
(100%)
(100%)
(58%)
(80%)
(50%)
Another particular form of controlled ventilation is
high-frequency ventilation (HFV). PEEPi reaching approximately 9 cmH20 was found in COPD patients ventilated with high-frequency jet ventilation [38].
P E E P i a n d assisted ventilation
During assisted ventilation, i.e. assist/control ventilation
(ACV), synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation
(SIMV), and pressure support ventilation (PSV), the inspiratory muscles are active at the beginning of inspiration, and even throughout inspiration, so as trigger the
mechanical breath [39, 40]. Expiration is mostly passive
and hence is controlled by the mechanical properties of
the respiratory system, as is the case with CV, together
with the added resistance of ETTs and ventilator circuits,
and by the ventilator setting. Therefore, in general, the
mechanisms leading to D P H and P E E P i during ACV,
SIMV, and PSV do not differ from those during CV.
However, with assisted ventilatory modes, random and erratic inspiratory efforts can either trigger undesired ventilatory cycles or interrupt expiration in the early phase in
such a way that there is a sudden reduction in the expiratory phase leading to a dramatic rise in the magnitude of
P E E P i. This has been described by Braschi et al. during
SIMV [41], and Fernandez et al. during ACV [42].
P E E P i a n d s p o n t a n e o u s breathing
It has been recognised that rapid shallow breathing (RSB)
is a common characteristic of patients with ARF from respiratory causes. RSB can occur during the early stage of
ARF and is also a common sign of unsuccessful weaning
[43]. Although D P H and P E E P i have not been measured
on wide scale in patients breathing spontaneously, there
can be little doubt that the short TE determined by RSB
may be associated with high levels of PEEPi particularly
in COPD patients, as illustrated in Fig. 3. In addition,
with the shortening of the expiratory phase, inertial fac-
526
tions of PEEP i in mechanically ventilated patients partly
depend on the mode of ventilation.
Flow
(I/s)
Controlled ventilation (CV)
Volume
(~)
APpl
(cmH20)
I
PEEP i [1] has three major consequences during controlled ventilation: (a) a drop in cardiac output due to the
impediment in cardiac filling determined by the positive
intrathoracic pressure; (b) a potentially greater risk of
barotrauma due to the high alveolar pressure; and (c) an
error in the computation of respiratory compliance.
Time = 13.84 s
Fig. 3 Representative record (flow, volume, and pleural pressure,
APN, from top to bottom) in an intubated, spontaneously breathing patient with acute exacerbation of COPD. The expiratory flow
is abruptly cut at the end of expiration, whilst Ppl swing (namely
the inspiratory effort) had already begun. The difference between
the point corresponding to the onset of the change in Ppl and the
point of zero flow on the Pvl tracing, represents PF,EPi,dyn) which
had to be counterbalanced by the contracting inspiratory muscles in
order to start inspiration. In this patient, the inspiratory muscles
had to develop 13 cmH20 before the inspiratory flow could start.
Tidal volume amounted to 0.31 frequency was 35 breaths/rain,
minute ventilation was 10.5 l/rain
tors due to the moving mass of the respiratory system
could also be a cause of hyperinflation. It is not possible
to provide a quantitative estimation, because inertial factors are generally disregarded. Nevertheless, these may become relevant as regards very rapid breathing.
In spontaneously breathing patients, respiratory muscle activity could affect DPH and PEEP i in terms of
both increased post-inspiratory muscle activity (PIIA)
and expiratory muscle contraction. The former has been
found in normal subjects and asthmatics during induced
bronchoconstriction [44], whereas the latter has been observed during stable COPD [29, 45] and during application of continuous positive airway pressure [46]. In critically ill patients, there has only been one recent report of
abdominal (expiratory) muscle activity [47].
Implications
Just over 10 years ago, Pepe and Marini [1] made the brilliant observation that in a few mechanically ventilated patients who were well adapted to the machine cycle and for
whom no PEEP was set by the ventilator, airway occlusion at the end of tidal expiration revealed positive endexpiratory alveolar pressure. This was termed auto PEEP
and occult PEEP [1], i.e. PEEP i (Fig. 1). Subsequent research has shown that PEEPi is quite common in mechanically ventilated patients [25] (Table 2). The implica-
PEEP i and haemodynamics
Although it is widely accepted that PEEP i can unduly
increase alveolar and intrathoracic pressure and hence reduce cardiac output, few measurements of haemodynamics in patients with significant levels of PEEP~ [3, 36, 48],
have been reported in the literature since the original observation by Pepe and Marini [1].
PEEPi reduces cardiac output [36], whereas a reduction in PEEP i increases cardiac output [48]. Unrecognised PEEP i, i.e. occult PEEP, may lead to misinterpretation of haemodynamic data, generating erroneous interpretation of the patient's volemic status [1]. High levels
of DPH and PEEP i can be associated with reduced cardiac filling and also significant cardiac arrhythmia, which
are reversed by a reduction in DPH and PEEP i.
P E E P i a n d barotrauma
Pulmonary barotrauma, defined by the presence of extraalveolar air in locations where it is not normally found,
is a well-recognised and teared event in mechanically ventilated patients [50, 51, 52]. In patients with high levels of
DPH and PEEP i, conventional tidal volume (i.e.
10-15 ml/kg) may shift ventilation toward the upper flat
portion of the volume-pressure curve of the lungs, thus
exposing terminal airspaces to the risk of overdistension
and rupture. However, to our knowledge, no studies have
been conducted to date showing a direct relationship between PEEP i and increased incidence of pulmonary
barotrauma. It has been suggested that PEEP and
PEEP i may help in preventing ventilatory induced lung
injury [52, 54]. PEEPi prevents end-expiratory alveolar
collapse and allows a smaller than usual tidal volume to
be used to ventilate the lungs, thus reducing the shear
forces between lung units with different regional degrees
of inflation [52, 54]. However, this interesting suggestion,
which puts PEEP i in a new perspective, requires further
clinical investigation.
527
PEEPi and measurement of respiratory compliance
As shown by Jonson et al. [55] and our work [3], if
PEEP i is not recognised and measured, a significant error is introduced in the calculation of static respiratory
compliance (Cst, rs), a variable which is commonly used
not only to assess the status and progress of ARF in mechanically ventilated patients, but also to set PEEP at the
ventilator [56]. Traditionally, Cst, r s is computed from the
following equation:
Cst, rs = V T / ( P p l a t - P E E P
)
(i)
but the correct equation is as follows
Cst,r s = VT/(Pplat - P E E P - P E E P i )
(2)
where VT is the tidal volume from the end-expiratory position and Pp:at is the plateau pressure measured during
end-inspiratory airway occlusion [1]. It has been shown
that true compliance may be underestimated by up to
100~ and 30~ in COPD [25] and ARDS [23] patients,
respectively, if PEEP i is not taken into account (i. e. Eq. 1
vs Eq. 2). In this context, it should be noted that due to
the interdependence of several non-constant factors (Table 1), the magnitude of PEEPi, and hence the extent of
the error in the computation of compliance, is difficult to
predict. It has to be stressed that most modern microprocessor-equipped mechanical ventilators that can display
the on-line computation of respiratory compliance do not
take PEEP i into account and thus provide incorrect and
therefore useless, if not misleading, information.
Assisted ventilation and weaning
In patients with ARF during assisted ventilation and
weaning, the implications of DPH and PEEP i are important in terms of the energetics of breathing [57]. First, dynamic hyperinflation profoundly alters the capacity of
the inspiratory muscles to sustain a load due to lengthtension considerations as well as changes in the geometrical arrangement [58]. Second, PEEP: is an inspiratory
threshold load [59] which must be counterbalanced by the
contracting inspiratory muscles in order to create sub-atmospheric pressure in the central airways and hence either
trigger the mechanical breath or generate inspiratory
flow. In these circumstances, the conventional equation
of motion becomes:
Pappl(t) = PEEP i + [ VT(t)/Cdyn] + [RToT" V:(t)]
the contribution required from the patient's respiratory
muscles is negligible. However, Marini et al. [39, 40] have
shown that the patient's inspiratory muscles can perform
a significant amount of work, which can equal, in some
conditions, the work performed during unassisted ventilation. This situation may be even worse in the presence
of PEEP i. Indeed, PEEP i adds to the triggering pressure
and the total amount of the effort required by the patient's respiratory muscles to produce the pressure boost
may be seriously increased. With high levels of PEEP i
(Fig. 3), the patient's inspiratory muscles continue to contract under load, even during ventilatory assistence, and
cannot recover from fatigue, so that weaning may be delayed or become impossible [60].
Because of its important clinical implications [61],
measurement of PEEP i should be a mandatory part of
the routine assessment of respiratory function in critically
ill patients.
Measurement
First of all, PEEP i must be suspected from the shape of
the expired flow versus time (Fig. 2) or volume (Fig. 4) relationship, whenever low flow, the final portion of the expiration, is suddenly cut by the onset of inspiration. We
believe that continuous and adequate display of flow and
pressure versus time records should be an essential monitoring facility in modern microprocessor-equipped ventilators.
In general, measurement of PEEP i and DPH is much
easier during controlled ventilation than during assisted
ventilation and weaning, since respiratory muscles are
more active in the latter conditions. When the respiratory
muscles are relaxed and sufficient time for equilibration
between regional units with different time constants has
been allowed, the pressure at the airway opening during
airway occlusion reflects mean alveolar pressure for the
definition of still fluid (Pascal's law). Simple and commonly available equipment such as a pneumotachograph
for measuring flow, and a differential pressure transducer
for sampling airway pressure can be used to measure
PEEPi, DPH and respiratory system mechanics [62, 63].
Since measurement of PEEPi may present more problems during assisted ventilation and weaning than during
CV, the two modes of ventilation will be discussed separately.
(3)
where Pappl is the total pressure applied to inflate the respiratory system, Vx is tidal volume, Cdy n is dynamic respiratory compliance, RTOT is total flow resistance, and
VI is the inspiratory flow rate, at any instant (t).
During assisted ventilation, the triggering pressure is
set at very low levels, e.g. 1 - 2 cm H20, so that the ventilator does most of the work of inflating the lungs and
Controlled ventilation
During CV, PEEP i can be easily measured either by endexpiratory airway occlusion (EEO) [2, 10, 23] (Fig. 1) or
by simultaneous recording of flow (~'i) and pressure at
the airway opening (Pao) (Fig. 2) [31. Although in one
study [3] the two methods yielded similar results, a more
528
with fast time constants start filling such that the change
in Pao preceding flow reflects the amount of pressure required to counterbalance P E E P i in the fast time constant
units, i.e. the lowest P E E P i , to start inspiratory flow.
P E E P i obtained from continuous recording of Pao and
Vi is referred to herein after dynamic P E E P i (PEEPi, dyn).
1.0
0,8
18
............
0,6
16
0.4
14
0.2
PEEP i
0
12
--~" -0.2
-0.4
"5
o
-0.6
8
o3
6
{3-
<::1 -0.8
-1.0
-1.2
-1.4
./"
4
~i'.'
2
-1,6
-1.8
I
0.1
i
I
t
I
02
0.3
Flow (I/s)
i
I
0.4
'
0
0.5
Fig. 4 Relaxed expiratory volume-flow curves in a mechanically
ventilated patient with acute exacerbation of COPD during controlled ventilation. The continuous line represents tidal expiration,
whereas the dashed line represents the attempt of complete expiration to the relaxation volume, which, however, was not achieved. At
the end of the tidal expiration, flow is suddenly cut by the next mechanical lung inflation, indicating DPH. The volume axis (extrapolated to zero) was transformed into a pressure axis (right y axis) by
dividing volume by respiratory compliance according to the formula: Pez rs = V~
where Pel rs is the elastic recoil pressure of
the respiratory system, and Crs is 'the respiratory compliance calculated by the interrupter technique (Fig. 5). Dynamic hyperinflation,
i.e. the difference between the relaxed volume and the tidal expired
volume, amounted to > 1.51 with a corresponding PEEP i amounting to > 12 cmH20
recent report revealed that P E E P i measured by EEO was
markedly greater than P E E P i measured by simultaneous
~ri of flow and Pao recording [64]. P E E P i measured by
EEO actually reflects the end-expiratory elastic recoil of
the respiratory system under static conditions, whereas
P E E P i measured from the change in Pao preceding Vi reflects the minimum "dynamic" P E E P i. Since the lung
units time constants are unequal, a well-recognised phenomenon in patients with airway and lung parenchyma
diseases [10, 20, 25, 65, 66], P E E P i cannot be distributed
homogeneously in the lungs, but will be greater in units
with long time constants and a slow rate of emptying than
in units with short time constants and rapid expiration.
During EEO, there is time for equilibration (Pendelluft)
of lung units with different regional P E E P i such that
P E E P i measured as the plateau pressure at airway opening during occlusion (Fig. 1) reflects the mean value after
equilibration. In contrast, P E E P i measured from the
change in Pao preceding inspiratory flow (Fig. 2) is the
minimum P E E P i. With incomplete expiration, the units
with long time constants are still emptying while those
End-expiratory airway occlusion
End-expiratory airway occlusion can be performed manually at the expiratory port of the ventilator during the last
0.5 s of an expiration [1, 67]. Alternatively, a pneumatic
valve can be used for rapid occlusion at the airway opening [3, 16, 25]. The second technique has the advantage
of excluding the compliance of gas compression in the
ventilator tubing (around 0.7 ml/cmH20 [20]), though
some variability may be due to occlusion timing. However, near the end of expiration the volume expelled per unit
of time is very small due to extreme airway compression,
so that small changes in TE would not be expected to affect the magnitude of PEEPi substantially, at least for
TE around 3 s [3, 67]. With shorter TE, the difference is
not negligible and P E E P i can increase significantly with
decreasing TE [3]. P E E P i can be measured with ventilators which are already equipped with the end-expiratory
occlusion hold, i.e., a button for the rapid occlusion of
the expiratory port exactly at the end of the tidal expiration (e.g. Servo 900C, Siemens). With other ventilators,
which do not include this option, airway occlusion can be
achieved by means of manually operated valves [68, 69].
In our experience (Table2), a plateau in airway
pressure was constantly observed within 1.0 s from the
onset of occlusion. However, D'Angelo et al. [9] observed
that a longer time was required for equilibration (up to
5 s) even in normal anaesthetised subjects during airway
occlusion at different lung volumes so as to observe a plateau in airway pressure. Since airway occlusion lasting a
few seconds does not create any discomfort to the patient,
occlusion longer than 1 s (up to 5 s) may also be used in
clinical practice. With EEO, P E E P i can also be directly
read on the ventilator's analog pressure display when recording facilities are not available. However, a significant
advantage of recording signals on paper or screen is the
possibility of observing the plateau in airway pressure,
thus providing direct evidence of respiratory muscle relaxation and the absence of leaks in the circuit as well as
equilibration between alveolar and airway opening pressure. With the airway pressure analogic signal recorded either on paper or on screen P E E P i is measured as the difference between the value of plateau pressure during airway occlusion and atmosphere, as illustrated in Fig. 1. If
P E E P was set by the ventilator, P E E P i is measured as
the difference between end-expiratory plateau pressure,
which represents total P E E P (PEEPt) and the pre-interruption level, which reflects the level of P E E P set by the
529
ventilator. Although this technique can lead to slight underestimation of P E E P i and overestimation of P E E P
because of a small amount of resistive pressure dur to
end-expiratory flow, the error is likely to be negligible.
This may be particularly useful in calculating changes in
P E E P i during a stepwise application of external P E E R
P E E P i measured by EEO reflects the end-expiratory
elastic recoil of the total respiratory system (PEEP~,r~).
We recently divided PEEPi,rs into its lung (PEEPi,1) and
chest wall component (PEEPi,w) using EEO together
with the oesophageal balloon technique [10, 19, 70]. In
our COPD and ARDS patients, PEEPi,rs substantially
reflected PEEPi,I, with a small chest wall contribution
(about 16~ on average).
PEEPi can be divided not only between the lung and
the chest wall, but also between the two lungs. In some
instances, P E E P i is unevenly distributed between the two
lungs. For example, P E E P i measured during differential
lung ventilation amounted to 12 cmH20 in the more severely diseased lung, whereas 4 cmH20 of PEEP~ was
found in the other lung [71]. In certain patients, such as
those with coexisting chronic airway obstruction and
fibrotic lung process, unilateral pulmonary hyperinflation and unilateral P E E P i up to 15 cmH20 can be observed [72].
and P E E P i measured using the supersyringe in 16 patients (r = 0.96, slope close to 1). A new computer-controlled occlusion method (SCASS = static compliance by
automated single steps) has been recently proposed for
the determination of P E E P i in mechanically ventilated
patients [751.
Continuous recording of flow and pressure
at airway opening
As illustrated in Fig. 2, this is an indirect method for measuring P E E P i. On the basis of the equation of motion
(Eq. 3), it assumes that the change in Pao preceding inspiratory flow reflects the amount of pressure required to
counterbalance P E E P i. This technique provides the
value of PEEPi,dyn and is of particular value for continuous monitoring of P E E P i, for example during
changes in the ventilator setting or to follow the effects of
bronchodilator therapy. Provided that the difference between E E O - P E E P i and PEEPi,dyn is kept in mind, this
technique has the advantage of avoiding any manoeuvre
in ventilator setting, allowing monitoring of P E E P i
1.0
Interrupter technique
The interrupter technique consists of multiple brief airway occlusions performed during relaxed expiration and
has been described in detail elsewhere [16, 20]. As illustrated in Fig. 5, the interrupter technique enables both dynamic hyperinflation, as the difference between Vr (intercept on the volume axis) and the AV = 0, which represents
end-expiratory lung volume during tidal ventilation, and
P E E P i, as the value of airway pressure at AV = 0, to be
measured. Total respiratory system compliance can be obtained from the slope of the regression line calculated
from the points through the central (linear) portion of the
VP relationship.
Static pressure-volume curve
P E E P i was recently measured on the static pressure-volume curve obtained by means of the supersyringe technique [73] which also enables respiratory compliance to
be determined and the "inflection point" to be detected
in patients with ARDS [74]. For measurement of P E E P i,
complete expiration to Vr is not possible. Instead, the
airway is occluded at the end of the tidal expiration and
P E E P i is measured as the amount of pressure which has
to be applied with the supersyringe before the respiratory
system starts inflating [73]. Fernandez et al. [73] found an
excellent correlation between P E E P i measured by EEO
0,5
,Ira'"
0
I/If"
.im.mI"""l
=~'-0,5
~><::1-1.0 I
IIII- 'j
-1.5 .
-2.0
.....
.m
0
PEEPi
~
5
10
15
Pao(cmH20)
20
25
Fig. 5 Volume-pressure relationship in a mechanically ventilated
patient with acute exacerbation of COPD during controlled ventilation. Pressure was measured at the airway opening (Pao)" The interrupter technique was used throughout a complete relaxed expiration. Dots are measurements from multiple interruptions. Complete
expiration went well below the tidal expiration and the elastic equilibrium volume of the respiratory system (Vr) is represented by the
intercept on the Y axis: the difference between Vr and AVolume = 0 provides the amount of DPH (> 1.51 in this patient). The
value for P~o at AVolume = 0 reflects the amount of the PEEP
(about 10 cmH20 in this patient)
530
breath-by-breath. Moreover, with some ventilators that
do not have the end-expiratory occlusion button, continuous recording of V~ and Pao can be the only means of
assessing rapid changes in PEEP i. A modification of this
approach has been suggested by Braschi et al. [76].
To summarise, during CV, measurement of PEEP i is
important, particularly in patients with obstructive airway disease and also easy to perform with simple, non-invasive, bedside techniques.
o
Because of its implications in terms of respiratory muscle
function and energetics of breathing, measurement of
DPH and PEEP i should routinely be performed in the
course of the assessment of respiratory function before
weaning is attempted, particularly in patients recovering
from acute exacerbation of COPD. EEO should be attempted first. However, since the respiratory muscles are
active in patients during assisted ventilation and weaning,
techniques requiring respiratory muscle relaxation, such
as EEO and the interrupter technique, may be unsuccessful, at least in common clinical practice. Nevertheless,
some investigators have also obtained reasonable plateaux
during assisted ventilation [67] and continuous positive
airway pressure (CPAP) [18]. Since expiration is mostly
relaxed during assisted ventilation, the interrupter technique could also be used, as is the case in experimental
animals [77] and in both anaesthetised [78] and awake
normal subjects [79]; however, this has yet to be attempted in critically ill patients with ventilator modes other
than CV. Hoffmann et al. recently suggested the use of respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) to measure
PEEP i during assisted ventilation [80]. Using the RIP
technique, the magnitude of PEEP i is calculated from
the amount of external PEEP which can be applied without changes in the end-expiratory thoracic volume. The
technique has the advantage of being non-invasive, but
still poses a few problems; for example, the patient has to
be relaxed, at least during the procedure, in the same way
as during satisfactory end-expiratory airway occlusion. In
addition, the value of PEEP~ obtained with the RIP
technique is lower than the true PEEP i since application
of PEEP equal to the initial PEEP i induces a moderate
increase in thoracic volume [8i]; only values of PEEP between 75% [18] and 85~ [19] of the initial PEEP i do
not significantly increase the end-expiratory volume. Finally, the RIP calibration procedure may not be easy or
straightforward at the bedside.
Oesophageal balloon
Although it represents an additional invasive procedure in
the crowded atmosphere surrounding the patients in the
sB
9 CPAP
[] PSV
10
PEEP+PSV
9
S
~//
d ,~ ^ , " " -
jr1
,, 0.8
o /o/
0.6
x~
E
O
v
Assisted modes of mechanical ventilation and weaning
1.0
12
6
w
I_o
a_
0.4
4
/ , - . " &" o .---
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
PEEPi,dy n uncorrected (cmH20)
Fig. 6 Relationship between values of PEEPidyn corrected
(PEEPidyn) and uncorrected (PEEPidyn uncorrected') for expiratory muscle relaxation in seven patients with COPD and ARE The
symbols are data from each patient during different ventilatory
modes with (closed symbols) and without (open symbols) application of CPAP or PEEP. Solid line is the line of identity. Dashed
lines indicate different ratios of corrected to uncorrected PEEPi,dy n
intensive care unit, the oesophageal balloon technique to
measure changes in Ppl remains, in most cases, the only
means of measuring PEEP i and pulmonary mechanics in
actively breathing patients. As illustrated in Fig. 3,
PEEP i is measured from the change in APpl preceding
flow. PEEP i measured in this way represents dynamic
PEEPi, as is the case for PEEPi obtained from continuous recording of V~ and Pao (Fig. 2), and it is significantly lower, compared with static PEEP i [18].
This method of measuring PEEPi,dyn, which has been
used in both acutely ill [18, 67, 82, 83] and stable [26-28]
COPD patients, is valid provided that the expiratory muscles are relaxed at the end of expiration. If the expiratory
muscles actively contract during expiration, the decrease
in Pp] in early inspiration could be due to expiratory
muscle relaxation rather than to inspiratory muscle contraction [29, 45]. However, in acutely ill COPD patients
the gastric component of PEEP i did not exceed a few
centimetres of water becoming negligible at the highest
values of PEEP i (Fig. 6).
Pleural pressure can be measured by a balloon-catheter system incorporated in a nasogastric tube used for nutrition thus rendering the process less invasive [84].
531
Treatment
The problem of reducing DPH and PEEPi has a major
clinical impact for the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD and asthma. In such patients, DPH
and PEEP i are systematically present reaching excessive
values. This can lead to impaired cardiac function, enhanced risk of barotrauma, reduced inspiratory muscle
pressure-generating capacity and abnormally increased
energy cost of breathing. Although some levels of PEEP i
have also been observed in patients without chronic airway disease [23, 25], the reduction of PEEP i in these patients is likely to be less relevant in the clinical picture and
easy to accomplish with small changes in T E. Therefore
this section of the article will concentrate mainly on the
treatment of PEEP i in patients with acute exacerbation
of COPD and asthma. Basically, there are four methods
for reducing PEEPi: (1) changes in ventilator setting; (2)
reduction in patient ventilatory demand; (3) bronchodilators; and (4) application of external PEEP. Clearly, the latter does not reduce DPH. All methods are suitable for simple application in the clinical setting and can
be used in synergy.
[85], who used "controlled hypoventilation" to improve
the clinical outcome in patients with status asthmaticus,
and also by Hickling et al. [86] in ARDS patients. Tuxen
et al. [56] showed that the magnitude of pulmonary hyperinflation is a major problem in patients with status
asthmaticus, and that the reduction of pulmonary
hyperinflation can be associated with a better clinical outcome [55]. In order to improve expiratory flow, the ETT
should have the largest possible internal diameter compatible with the patient's characteristics; cleaning of the
tube by frequent suctioning is also extremely important in
prevening an abnormal increase in flow resistance due to
the accumulation of secretions in the lumen.
Reduction of ventilatory demand
During assisted ventilation techniques such as ACV,
SIMV and PSV, and weaning, it is more difficult to control the ventilator setting than during Cu because it depends, at least in part, upon the patient's ventilatory demand and pattern. In such circumstances, it can be important to reduce the patient's ventilatory demand and
minute ventilation. For example, overfeeding and/or excessive carbohydrate feeding unduly increase CO 2 production. Correct nutritional support will reduce CO2 and
Changes in ventilator setting and apparatus
hence the ventilatory drive. It is also important to reduce
the dead space as possible by keeping the proximal tip of
The ventilatory pattern should be set so as to provide the
the ETT as close as possible to the Y-piece of the venlongest expiratory phase compatible with the patient's
tilatory tubing. Changes in ventilatory mode may also decomfort and adequate gas exchange. This can be achieved
crease PEEPi; for example, Conti et al. [49] reduced
during controlled ventilation by decreasing ventilatory
PEEP i from 17 crnH20 to 7 cmH20 in a mechanically
frequency (e.g. from 15 to 12-10 breaths/min) and the
ventilated COPD patient by switching the ventilatory
inspiratory time (T~), or increasing inspiratory flow rate
mode from SIMV to PSV: the respiratory frequency de(V~). At any given level of minute ventilation (VE) a rise
creased from 31 to 13 breaths/m, and cardiac complicain VI will reduce T I and increase T~; reducing the
tions due to excessive pulmonary hyperinflation disapTI/TTo7 or the I : E ratio. High values of peak cycling
peared.
pressure (Ppeak) associated with high inspiratory flow
should not be noticeable. The high Ppeak can in fact be
due to the resistive pressure required to push inspiratory Bronchodilators
flow through the endotracheal tube and the conducting
airway, and will not affect alveolar pressure. The use of It has been shown that commonly used bronchodilators
high inspiratory flow to lengthen the expiratory duration, such as methylxanthines (doxofylline) and [32-adrenergic
although useful, may not be sufficient. In mechanically agonists (e. g. fenoterol and albuterol) are also active in
ventilated patients with severe airflow obstruction, a com- mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation
plete expiration can require more than 20 s [20, 21]. Such of COPD [87-91]. Both groups of drugs significantly rea long T E cannot be used in clinical ventilator setting. In duce airway resistance because of their relaxant effect on
addition, a T E slightly longer than 3 s may give rise to bronchial smooth muscle. The improved rate of lung
only a small reduction in PEEP i due to the extremely low emptying decreases DPH and PEEP i. Bernasconi et al.
expiratory flow rate.
[88] showed that [32-adrenergic agonists could determine
Tidal volume can be also reduced so as to decrease the a significant, albeit brief, bronchodilatation in patients
amount of air to be exhaled and hence DPH and PEEP i. already receiving a continuous infusion of aminophylline.
However, reduction in VT will decrease alveolar ventila- Manthous et al. [91] recently showed that the decrease in
tion and hence determine a rise in PaCO2 . Traditionally, resistive pressure was greater with nebulised albuterol
a PaCO2 higher than 45 mmHg has been perceived as an than with equal doses delivered by metered dose inhalers.
adverse event in mechanically ventilated patients. This The delivery system may be as important as the drug itself
traditional view has been challenged by Darioli and Perret in determing the therapeutic response [92].
532
It has been shown in stable COPD patients that the decrease in lung volume determined by bronchodilators can
increase inspiratory muscle strength by improving the operational length of diaphragmatic fibres in their lengthtension relationship [26]. This effect, associated with a
reduction in P E E P i and in work of breathing [93] can be
very important for weaning.
There is little evidence of the effect of steroids in mechanically ventilated COPD patients. It could be predicted that steroids improve airway patency by reducing the
amount of secretions in the bronchial lumen as well as the
inflammatory process in the bronchial wall. Nava et al.
[941 showed that parenteral steroids can reduce D P H and
PEEPi in mechanically ventilated COPD patients.
A special condition requiring aggressive measures in
order to reduce airway resistance is a life-threatening asthma attack [95]; for example, adrenaline can determine an
important reduction in both P E E P i and D P H (Fig. 7).
However, in some cases, the failure of conventional bronchodilators to reverse the severe airflow obstruction and
D P H can be observed. In some patients, supplemental
bronchodilatation can be obtained by deep sedation
reaching anaesthetic levels, considering that profound
sedation can have per sea bronchial smooth muscle relaxant effect [96]. In addition, some volatile and/or intravenous anaesthetics have a bronchodilating action, such as
ketamine and, particularly, halothane, a volatile general
anaesthetic that is a popular "last resort" powerful bronchodilator [961.
Application of PEEP
C o n t r a r y to the t r a d i t i o n a l n o t i o n a n d t a k i n g s o m e controversy into a c c o u n t [29, 97], it seems a c c e p t a b l e t h a t
m o d e r a t e (judicious) levels o f P E E P can be o f benefit in
patients with acute e x a c e r b a t i o n o f C O P D d u r i n g assisted
v e n t i l a t i o n a n d weaning [22, 83]. A s m e n t i o n e d above,
P E E P i is an i n s p i r a t o r y t h r e s h o l d l o a d which has to be
c o u n t e r b a l a n c e d by the p a t i e n t ' s i n s p i r a t o r y muscles
either b e g i n n i n g i n s p i r a t i o n or triggering the m e c h a n i c a l
breath. P r o v i d e d t h a t tidal e x p i r a t i o n is flow limited, app l i c a t i o n o f P E E P will p a r t l y replace P E E P i, w i t h o u t
a d d i n g to it a n d hence w i t h o u t increasing lung volume,
until a critical value s o m e w h a t lower t h a n P E E P i has
been exceeded [17, 83]. In line with the cascade t h e o r y o f
e x p i r a t o r y flow l i m i t a t i o n [98, 99], these results were obt a i n e d in several clinical studies [17 - 19, 47, 80, 100]. Figure 8 shows t h a t a p p l i c a t i o n o f P E E P lower t h a n P E E P i
in a C O P D p a t i e n t d u r i n g c o n t r o l l e d v e n t i l a t i o n d i d n o t
increase p e a k cycling pressure.
D u r i n g assisted ventilation a n d weaning, a p p l i c a t i o n
o f P E E P can u n l o a d the p a t i e n t ' s i n s p i r a t o r y muscles.
60
50
40
0
0.8
0.6
30
v
v
0.4
0
0.2
13..
d3
E
0
> -0.2
<1
-0.4
-0.6
d~
n
20
10
e
d2d
~ Adrenahne
-0.8
-1
I
I
I
I
10
20
30
40
I""
50
Pao (cm H20 )
Fig. 7 Static volume-pressure relationship in a mechanically ventilated patient with acute severe asthma. As in Fig. 5, experimental
points were obtained by the interrupter technique. Stars and empty
triangles are interrupter measurements before and after 0.1 mg
adrenaline. The relaxant effect of adrenaline on bronchial smooth
muscle decreased both the amount of DPH and PEEP i, without
changes in the slope of the volume-pressure relationship, i.e. respiratory compliance. Though the patients were allowed 30 s for
breathing out, expiration was still not completed because of the exterme flow resistance and maybe expiratory flow limitation. Measurement of DPH and PEEP i was performed as illustrated in Fig. 5
0
L__.
I
I
5
i
I
10
15
20
25
30
Time (s)
Fig. 8 Pressure at the airway opening (Pao) versus time during
controlled ventilation in a given patient with acute exacerbation of
COPD. PEEP i was measured by EEO. From the first mechanical
inflation, PEEP was set by the ventilator at 5 cmH20 (second inflation) and at 10 cmH20 (third inflation). Then the total PEEP
(i.e. PEEPtot = PEEP+PEEP i) was measured again by EEO.
Since PEEP partly replaced PEEP i, without adding to it, because
of flow limitation, the peak cycling pressure did not change despite
increasing PEEP set by the ventilator. This figure illustrates a simple way to assess the effect of PEEP set by the ventilator in patients
with PEEP i at least during CV
533
The initial value of P E E P i should not be exceeded [97],
and individual differences should also be taken into account [101]. Moreover, the presence of expiratory flow
limitation should also be assessed, for example following
the procedure illustrated in Fig. 4. It has been shown by
Tuxen, that application of P E E P in patients without evidence of expiratory flow limitation, can further increase
pulmonary hyperinflation and its adverse consequences
[97]. In this context, it should be noted that, while there
is evidence of expiratory flow limitation in mechanically
ventilated C O P D patients, it is still not known whether
expiratory flow limitation exists in mechanically ventilated patients with status asthmaticus. In such circumstances, the rationale for application of P E E P in asthma
remains uncertain and further investigation is required.
High levels of PEEP, up to 25 cmH20, have been used
with the purpose of opening closed airways [102]. An
unusual case was recently published [103] concerning a
51-year-old w o m a n with pulmonary oedema and bronchospasm, who managed to produce "auto P E E P " by
holding her head out of the window while her husband
was driving to the hospital at 80 mph; it was calculated
that the effect of the above corresponded to 8 c m H 2 0
PEEP. Apparently, this was needed to keep the patient
out of a coma [103].
Although no controlled, randomised clinical trials
have shown that weaning of C O P D patients is significantly improved by the use of P E E P (or CPAP), clinical and
physiological studies have documented that application
of P E E P or CPAP nearly up to the level of initial
P E E P i, in C O P D patients, being of benefit during assisted ventilation [67], pressure support ventilation [100] and
weaning [18]. As shown by Fernandez et al. [42], moderate levels of P E E P can be adapted to ventilated patients
with P E E P i, who were thought to be fighting the ventilator. Low levels of P E E P and CPAP (about 5 c m H 2 0 )
were used for mask (non-invasive) ventilatory support in
patients with acute exacerbation of C O P D [47]. CPAP
was also applied to asthmatic patients with acute asthma
[104] and respiratory failure [105] in the emergency room.
Although it is generally agreed that the initial level of
PEEPi should not be exceeded, some controversy still remains as to the best level of P E E P to be set. Ranieri et
al. [19] suggested a level of external P E E P amounting to
85% of the initial PEEPi. Georgopoulos et al. [101] recently concluded that the individual patient response to
P E E P is still unpredictable. Fernandez et al. [81] observed
that levels of P E E P equal to initial P E E P i caused a moderate but detectable increase in end-expiratory volume,
which was more marked in patients with high pulmonary
compliance. During mask ventilatory support, Appendini
et al. [47] used a level of CPAP and P E E P amounting to
90~ of the initial P E E P i and did not observe significant
changes in end-expiratory volume.
Table3 Treatment of PEEP i
Changes in ventilator setting
9 Increase expiratory duration
9 Decrease ventilatory frequency
9 Decrease tidal volume
Reduction in the ventilatory demand
9 Decrease carbohydrate intake
9 Reduce dead space
9 Reduce anxiety, pain, fever, shivering
Reduction of total flow resistance
9 Use of large bore endotracheal tubes
9 Frequent suctioning
9 Bronchodilators
Application o f external PEEP nearly up to the level o f initial
PEEPi
In our practice, the minimum and m a x i m u m level of
P E E P are represented by PEEPi, dyn and P E E P i, respectively, measured during end-expiratory airway occlusion.
I f PEEPi,ay n is not measured, a level of P E E P amounting
to 85O7o of E E O - P E E P i appears safe [19, 47]. Application of moderate levels of PEEP, i.e. lower than P E E P i
measured by end-expiratory airway occlusion, should be
started almost simultaneously with the institution of
assisted modes of ventilation to decrease the ventilatory
load [106]. Whether or not CPAP is a choice technique
for weaning has yet to be established [107]. Methods for
the management of P E E P i are listed in Table 3.
Conclusion
In this review we have examined the physiological basis,
the clinical implications, the measurement techniques and
the treatment of P E E P i in critically ill patients during
mechanical ventilation and weaning. P E E P i actually
occurs much more frequently in the intensive care setting
than was originally thought. However, all the published
studies address mainly the physiological aspects and concern a small number of patients. More complete, longterm, randomised clinical trials are needed in the near
future to investigate the clinical impact of PEEPi as well
as the advantage of applying PEEP, and CPAP.
Acknowledgements The authors of this article are indebted to
Prof. J. Milic-Emili (Montreal, Canada) for all they have been privileged to learn from his lectures on the addressed topic and from
many friendly discussions with him on both physiological mechanisms and clinical implications. They also want to express their
gratitude to Prof. A. Braschi (Pavia, Italy) and to Prof. S.K.
Pingleton (Kansas City, USA) for their valuable contributions to
the discussion on the clinical impact of intrinsic PEEP. We would
like to thank Miss Anna Ciucci for her help in preparing the manuscript.
534
References
i. Pepe PE, Marini JJ (1982) Occult positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with airflow
obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 126:
166-170
2. Simbruner G (1986) Inadvertent positive end-expiratory pressure in mechanically ventilated newborn infants: detection and effect on lung mechanics and
gas exchange. J Pediatr 108:589-595
3. Rossi A, Gottfried SB, Zocchi L et al
(1985) Measurement of static compliance of the total respiratory system in
patients with acute respiratory failure
during mechanical ventilation: the
effect of "intrinsic" PEEP. Am Rev
Respir Dis 131:672-767
4. Eberhard L, Guttmann J, Wolff G,
Bertschmann W, Minzer A, Kohl H-J,
Zeravik J, Adolph M, Eckart J (1992)
Intrinsic PEEP monitored in the ventilated ARDS patient with a mathematical method. J Appl Physiol 73:
479-485
5. Agostoni E, Mead J (1964) Statics of
the Respiratory System. In: Fenn WO,
Rahn H (eds) Handbook of physiology,
section 3: Respiration, vol I. American
Physiological Society, Washington DC,
pp 387-409
6. Martini JG, De Troyer A (1985) The
thorax and control of functional residual capacity. In: Roussos C, Macklem PT
(eds) Lung biology in health and disease, the thorax. (vol 29, Part B) Dekker, New York, pp 899-921
7. Rossi A, Polese G, Brandi G (1991) Dynamic hyperinflation. In: Marini J J,
Roussos C (eds) Ventilatory failure. (vol
15) Spinger, Berlin, pp 199-218
8. Fuleihan SF, Wilson RS, Pontoppidan
H (1976) Effect of mechanical ventilation with end-inspiratory pause on
blood-gas exchange. Anesth Analg
55:122-130
9. D'Angelo E, Calderini E, Torri G,
Robatto FM, Bono D, Milic-Emili J
(1989) Respiratory mechanics in anesthetized paralyzed humans: effects of
flow, volume, and time. J Appl Physiol
67:2556-2564
10. Polese G, Rossi A, Brandi Get al (1991)
Partitioning of respiratory mechanics in
mechanically ventilated patients. J
Appl Physiol 71:2425-2433
11. Wright PE, Bernard GR (1989) The role
of airflow resistance in patients with
the adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Am Rev Respir Dis 139:1169-1174
12. Wright PE, Marini JJ, Bernard GR
(1989) In vitro versus in vivo comparison on endotracheal tube airflow resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:10-16
13. Saetta M, Ghezzo H, Kim VD et al
(1985) Loss of alveolar attachment in
smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 132:
894 - 900
14. Kimball WR, Leith DE, Robins AG
(1982) Dynamic hyperinflation and
ventilator dependence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev
Respir Dis 126:991-995
15. Collet PW, Roussos C, Macklem PT
(1988) Respiratory mechanics. In: Murray F, Nadel J (eds) Textbook of respiratory Medicine, vol 1. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 85-128
16. Gottfried SB, Rossi A, Higgs BD et al
(1985) Non-invasive determination of
respiratory system mechanics during
mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:
414-420
17. Gay CC, Rodarte JR, Hubmayr RD
(1989) The effects of positive expiratory
pressure on isovolume flow and dynamic hyperinflation in patients receiving
mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir
Dis 139:621-626
18. Petroff BJ, Legare M, Goldberg P,
Milic-Emili J, Gottfried SB (1990) Continuous positive airway pressure reduces
work of breathing and dyspnea during
weaning from mechanical ventilation in
severe chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:
281-289
19. Ranieri M, Giuliani R, Cinnella Get al
(1993) Physiologic effects of positive
end-expiratory pressure in patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
during acute ventilatory failure and
controlled mechanical ventilation. Am
Rev Respir Dis 147:5-13
20. Broseghini C, Brandolese R, Poggi R et
al (1988) Respiratory mechanics during
the first day of mechanical ventilation
in patients with pulmonary edema and
chronic airway obstruction. Am Rev
Respir Dis i38:355-361
21. Tnxen DV, Lane S (1987) The effects of
ventilatory pattern on hyperinflation
airway pressures, and circulation in
mechanical ventilation of patients with
severe air-flow obstruction. Am Rev
Respir Dis 136:872-879
22. Rossi A, Brandolese R, Milic-Emili J,
Gottfried SB (1990) The role of PEEP
in patients with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease during assisted ventilation. Eur Respir J 3:818-822
23. Broseghini C, Brandolese R, Poggi R et
al (1988) Respiratory resistance and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure
(PEEP) in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Eur
Respir J 1:726-731
24. Pesenti A, Pelosi P, Rossi Net al (1991)
The effects of positive end-expiratory
resistance in patients with the adult
respiratory distress syndrome and in
normal anesthetized subjects. Am Rev
Respir Dis 144:101-107
25. Bernasconi M, Ploysongsang Y, Gottfried SB, Milic-Emili J, Rossi A (1988)
Respiratory compliance and resistance
in mechanically ventilated patients with
acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care
Med i4:547-553
26. Dal Vecchio L, Polese G, Poggi R, Rossi
A (1990) "Intrinsic" positive end-expiratory pressure in stable patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Eur Respir J 3:74-80
27. Begin P, Grassino A (1991) Inspiratory
muscle dysfunction and chronic hypercapnia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:
905-912
28. Haluszka J, Chartrand DA, Grassino
A, Milic-Emili J (1990) Intrinsic PEEP
and arterial PCO 2 in stable patients
with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:
1194-1197
29. Ninane V, Yernault JC, De Troyer A
(1993) Intrinsic PEEP in patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Am Rev Respir Dis 148:1037-1042
30. Aldrich TK, Hendler JM, Vizioli LD,
Park M, Multz AS, Shapiro SM (1993)
Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in ambulatory patients with airway
obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 147:
845- 849
31. Pradal U, Poggi R, Polese G, Braggion
C, Mastella G, Rossi A (1994) Malnutrition not hyperinflation is the major
cause of diaphragm weakness in cystic
fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
150:167- i73
32. Moore FA, Haenel JB, Moore EE,
Abernathy CM (1990) Auto PEEP in
patients with multisystemic failure: an
ambiguous complicance. J Trauma
30:1316-1323
33. Gurevitch M J, Van Dyke JV, Young ES,
Jackson K (1986) Improved oxygenation and lower peak airway pressure in
severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 2:211-213
34. Abraham E, Yoshihara G (1989) Cardiorespiratory effects of pressure controlled inverse ratio ventilation in severe
respiratory failure. Chest 96:1356-1359
35. Cole AGH, Weller SF, Sykes MK (1984)
Inverse ratio ventilation compared with
PEEP in adult respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 10:227-232
535
36. Brandolese R, Broseghini C, Polese G 48. Rossi A, Santos C, Roca J Tortes A, 61. Rossi A, Polese G, De Sandre G (1992)
et al (1993) Effects of intrinsic PEEP
Felez MA, Rodriguez-Roisin R (1994)
Respiration failure in chronic airflow
on pulmonary gas exchange in mechanEffects of intrinsic PEEP on ventilaobstruction: recent advances and
ically-ventilated patients. Eur Respir J
therapeutic implications in the critically
tion-perfusion mismatching mechan6:358-363
ically ventilated patients with acute or
ill patients. Eur J Med 2:50-58
37. Gattinoni L, Marcolin R, Caspani ML
chronic airway obstrcution. Am J 62. Rodriguez-Roisin R, Rossi A (1991) Aset al (1985) Constant mean airway presRespir Crit Care Med 149:1077-1084
sessment of lung function in the critisure with different patterns of positive 49. Conti G, Bunfi M, Antonelli M, Rocco
cally ill patient. Clin Intensive Care
pressure breathing during the adult re2:97 - 103
M, Gasparetto A (1989) Pressure supspiratory distress syndrome. Bull Eur
port ventilation (PSV) reverses hyperin- 63. Marini JJ (1992) What derived variPhysiopathol Respir 21:275-279
flation-induced isorhythmic A-V dissoables should be monitored during me38. Conti G, Bufi M, Rocco Met al (1990)
ciation. Intensive Care Med t5:
chanical ventilation? Respir Care 37:
319-321
Auto-PEEP and dynamic hyperinflaI097 - 1107
tion in COPD patients during con- 50. Haake R, Schlichtig R, Ulstad DR, 64. Maltais F, Sovilj M, Ranieri VM,
trolled mechanical ventilation and high
Henschen R (1987) Barotrauma. PathoNavalese P, Gottfried SB (1992) Comfrequency jet ventilation. Intensive Care
physiology, risk factors and prevention.
parison between static and dynamic
Med I6:81-84
Chest 91:608-613
measurement of intrinsic PEEP
39. Marini J J, Rodriguez RM, Lamb VJ 51. Pingleton SK (1988) Complications of
(PEEPi) in mechanically ventilated pa(1986) The inspiratory workload of paacute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir
tients. Intensive Care Med [Suppl 2]
tient-initiated mechanical ventilation.
Dis 137:1463-1493
18:$94
Am Rev Respir Dis 134:902-909
52. Lachmann B (1992) Open the lung and 65. Bates JHT, Rossi A, Milic-Emili J
40. Marini JJ, Smith TC, Lamb VJ (1988)
(1985) Analysis of the behaviour of the
keep the lung open, Intensive Care Med
External work output and force genera18:319-321
respiratory system with constant intion during synchronized intermittent 53. Corbridge TC, Wood LDH, Crawford
spiratory flow. J Appl Physiol 58:
mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir
GP, Chudoba M J, Yanos J, Sznajder JI
1840-1848
Dis 138:1169-1179
(1990) Adverse effects of large tidal vol- 66. Rossi A, Gottfried SB, Higgs BD, Zoc41. Braschi A, Iotti G, Rodi G, Emmi V,
ume and low PEEP in canine acid aspichi L, Grassino A, Milic-Emili J (1985)
Sala Gallini G (1988) Dynamic pulmoration. Am Rev Respir Dis 142:
Respiratory mechanics in mechanically
nary hyperinflation (DPH) during in311-315
ventilated patients with respiratory failtermittent
mandatory
ventilation 54. Lichtwarck-Arschoff M, Nielsen JB,
ure. J Appl Physiol 58:1849-1858
(IMV). Intensive Care Med 14:89
Sjostrand UH, Edgren EL (1992) An 67. Smith T, Marini JJ (1988) Impact of
42. Fernandez R, Benito S, Blanch LL, Net
experimental randomized study of five
PEEP on lung mechanics and work of
A (1988) Intrinsic PEEP: a cause of indifferent ventilatory modes in a piglet
breathing in severe airflow obstruction.
spiratory muscle ineffectivity. Intensive
model of severe respiratory distress, InJ Appl Physiol 65:i488-1499
Care Med 15:5i-52
tensive Care Med 18:339-347
68. Iotti G, Braschi A (1990) respiratory
43. Yang KL, Tobin M (1991) A prospective 55. Jonson B, Nordstrom L, Olsson SG,
mechanics in chronic obstructive pulstudy of indexes predicting the outcome
Akerback D (1975) Monitoring of venmonary disease. In: Vincent JL (ed) Inof trials of weaning from mechanical
tilation and lung mechanics during autensive care medicine UPDATE 1990.
ventilation. N Engl J Med 324:
tomatic ventilation. A new device. Bull
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York,
1445-1450
Physiopathol Respir 11:729-743
pp 223-230
44. Martin JG, Powell R, Shore S, Emrich 56. Suter PM, Fairley B, Isenberg MD 69. Gottfried SB, Reissman H, Ranieri MV
J, Engel LA (1980) The role of respira(1975) Optimum end-expiratory in pa(1992) A simple method for the meatory muscles in the hyperinflation of
tients with acute pulmonary failure. N
surement of intrinsic positive end-expibronchial asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis
Engl J Med 292:284-289
ratory pressure during controlled and
121:441
57. Gottfried SB, Rossi A, Milic-Emili J
assisted modes of mechanical ventila45. Ninane V, Rypens F, Yernault JC, De
(1986) Dynamic hyperinflation, instrintion. Crit Care Med 20:621-629
Troyer A (1992) Abdominal muscle use
sic PEEP, and the mechanically ven- 70. Polese G, Rossi A, Brandi G, Ranieri
during breathing in patients with
tilated patient. Intensive Crit Care Dig
VM, Giuliani R (1993) Partitioning of
chronic airflow obstruction. Am Rev
5:30-33
intrinsic PEEP (letter) Am Rev Respir
Respir Dis 146:16-21
58. Roussos C, Macklem PT (1986) InDis 148:1145- 1146
46. Martin JG, Shore S, Engle LA (1982)
spiratory fatigue. In: Handbook of 71. Alberti A, Valenti S, Gallo F, Vincenti
Effect of continuous positive airway
physiology, sect 3: The respiratory sysE (1992) Differential lung ventilation
pressure on respiratory mechanics and
tem, vol III, part 2. American physiowith a double-lumen tracheostomy tube
pattern of breathing in induced asthma.
logical Society, Washington DC pp
in unilateral refractory atelectasis. InAm Rev Respir Dis 126:812-817
511-527
tensive Care Med 18:479-484
47. Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni Set
59. Milic-Emili J (1991) Control of ventila- 72. Kollef MH, Turner JF (1992) Intrinsic
al (1994) Physiologic effects of positive
tion and response to loading. In:
PEEP and unilateral lung hyperinflaend-expiratory pressure in patients with
Marini J J, ROUSSOSC (eds) Ventilatory
tion. Phathophysiology and clinical sigchronic obstructive pulmonary disease
failure. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg
nificance. Chest I02:1220-1224
during acute exacerbations and non-inNew York, pp 37-48
73. Fernandez R, Mancebo J, Blanch LL,
vasive ventilatory assistance. Am J 60. Benito S, Vallverdu I, Mancebo J (1991)
Benito S, Claf N, Net A (1990) Intrinsic
Respir Crit Care Med 149:I069-1076
Which patients need a weaning techPEEP on static pressure-volume curves.
nique? In: Marini J J, ROUSSOSC (eds)
Intensive Care Med 16:233-236
Ventilatory failure. Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg New York, pp 419-429
536
74. Lemaire F, Beydon L, Jonson B (1991)
Lung mechanics in ARDS. Compliance
and pressure-volume curves. In: Zapol
WM, Lemaire F (eds) Adult respiratory
distress syndrome. Dekker, New York,
pp 139-161
75. Sydow M, Burchardi H, Zinserling J,
Ische H, Crozier TA, Weyland W (1991)
Improved determination of static compliance by automated single volume
steps in ventilated patients. Intensive
Care reed 17:108-114
76. Braschi A, Iotti G, Gallini SA et al
(1990) A new method of indirect evaluation for AutoPEEP during controlled
ventilation (CMV). Am Rev Respir Dis
141:A577
77. Gottfried SB, Rossi A, Calverly PMA,
Zocchi L, Milic-Emili J (1984) Interrupter technique for measurement of
respiratory mechanics in anesthetized
cats. J Appl Physiol 56:681-690
78. Gottfried SB, Higgs BD, Rossi A et al
(1985) Interrupter technique for measurement of respiratory mechanics in
anesthetized humans. J Appl Physiol
58:647-651
79. Shee CD, Ploysongsang 5(, Milic-Emili
J (1985) Decay of inspiratory muscle
pressure during expiration in conscious
humans. J Appl Physiol 58:1859-1865
80. Hoffman RA, Ershowsky P, Krieger BP
(1989) Determination of auto-PEEP
during spontaneous and controlled ventilation by monitoring changes in endexpiratory thoracic gas volume. Chest
96:613 -616
81. Fernandez Mond6jar E, Vazquez Mata
G, Navarrete Navarro P, Rivera Fernandez R, Torres Ruiz JM, Carazo E
(1992) Increase in lung volume originated by extrinsic PEEP in patients with
auto-PEEP. Intensive Care Med 18:
269-273
82. Brochard L, Isabey D, Piquet J et al
(1990) Reversal of acute exacerbations
of chronic obstructive lung disease by
inspiratory assistance with a face mask.
N Engl J Med 323:1523-1530
83. Gottfried SB (1991) The role of PEEP
in the mechanically ventilated COPD
patient. In: Marini J J, Roussos C (eds)
Ventilatory failure. Springer, Berlin
Heidelberg New York, pp 392-418
84. Gillespie DJ (1982) Comparison of
intraesophageal balloon pressure measurements with a nasogastric esophageal balloon system in volunteers.
Am Rev Respir Dis 126:583-585
85. Darioli R, Perret C (1984) Mechanically
controlled hypoventilation in status
asthmaticus. Am Rev Respir Dis 129:
385-387
86. Hickling KG, Henderson SJ, Jackson R
(1990) Low mortality associated with
low volume pressure limited ventilation
with permissive hypercapnia in severe
adult respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 16:372-377
87. Poggi R, Brandolese R, Bernasconi M,
Manzin E, Rossi A (1989) Doxofylline
and respiratory mechanics. Chest 96:
772-778
88. Bernasconi M, Brandolese R, Poggi R,
Manzin E, Rossi A (1990) Dose-response and time course effects of inhaled fenoterol on respiratory mechanics and arterial oxygen tension in
mechanically ventilated patients with
chronic airflow obstruction. Intensive
Care Med 16:108-114
89. Gay PC, Rodarte JR, Tayyab M, Hubmayr RD (1987) Evaluation of bronchodilator responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir
Dis 136:880-885
90. Navalesi P, Maltais F, Gursahaney A,
Hernandez P, Sovilj M, Gottfried SB
(1992) Cumulative dose-response relationship for salbutamol delivered by
metered dose inhaler in mechanically
ventilated patients with severe airflow
obstruction. Intensive Care Med 18:
$169
91. Manthous CA, Jesse BH, Schmidt GA,
Wood LDH (1993) Metered-dose inhaler versus nebulized albuterol in
mechanically ventilated patients. Am
Rev Respir Dis 148:1567-1570
92. Newhouse MT, Fuller HD (1993) Rose
is a rose is a rose? Am Rev Respir Dis
148:1444-1446
93. Mancebo J, Amaro P, Lorino H,
Lemaire F, Harf A, Brochard L (1991)
Effects of albuterol inhalation on the
work of breathing during weaning from
mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir
Dis 144:95- 100
94. Nava S, Rubini F, Zanotti E, Fracchia
C, Rampulla C (1992) Effects of steroids on respiratory mechanics in
mechanically ventilated patients with
COPD and respiratory failure. Intensive
Care Med 18:$102
95. Sydow M, Burchardi H (1991) Intensive care management of life-threatening status asthmaticus. In: Vincent JL
(ed) Intensive care and emergency
medicine 14. Update 1991. Springer,
Berlin Heidelberg New York, 313 -323
96. Maltais F, Sovilj M, Goldberg P, Gottfried SB (1992) Effect of inhalation
anesthesia on respiratory mechanics in
status asthmaticus. Am Rev Respir Dis
145:A77
97. 1hxen DV (1989) Detrimental effects
of positive end-expiratory pressure
during controlled mechanical ventilation of patients with severe airflow obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:5-9
98. Tobin MJ, Lodato FR (1986) PEEP,
auto-PEEP and waterfalls. Chest 96:
449 - 451
99. Marini JJ (1989) Should PEEP be
used in airflow obstruction? (editorial)
Am Rev Respir Dis 140:1-3
100. Calderini E, Petrof BJ, Gottfried SB
(1989) Continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP) improves the efficacy
of pressure support (PS) ventilation in
severe chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease (COPD). Am Rev Respir Dis
139:A155
101. Georgopoulos D, Giannoulli E, Patakas D (1993) Effects of extrinsic positive end-expiratory
pressure on
mechanically ventilated patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
and dynamic hyperinflation. Intensive
Care Med 19:197-203
102. Qvist J, Pemberton M, Bennike KA
(1982) High-level PEEP in severe asthma. N Engl J Med 307:1347. 1348
103. McKee JD, Spevetz A, Simony P
(1993) Auto PEEP (letter) N Engl J
Med 329:212-213
104. Schivaram U, Miro AM, Cash ME et
al (1993) Cardiopulmonary responses
to continuous positive airway pressure
in acute asthma. J Crit Care 8:87-92
105. Mansel JK, Stogner SW, Norman JR
(1989) Face-mask CPAP and sodium
bicarbonate infusion in acute, severe
asthma and metabolic acidosis. Chest
96:943 - 944
106. Fleury B, Murciano D, Talamo D,
Aubier C, Pariente R, Milic-Emili J
(1985) Work of breathing in patients
with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease in acute respiratory failure.
Am Rev Respir Dis 132:822-827
107. Milic-Emili (1986) Is weaning an art
or a science? Am Rev Respir Dis
134:1107-1108