Materials Science-Poland, 30(1), 2012, pp. 32-38
http://www.materialsscience.pwr.wroc.pl/
DOI: 10.2478/s13536-012-0008-1
Photocatalytic performance of titania nanospheres deposited
on graphene in coumarin oxidation reaction∗
M. W OJTONISZAK† , B. Z IELINSKA , R. J. K ALENCZUK , E. M IJOWSKA
West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Institute of Chemical and Environment Engineering,
Pulaskiego 10, 70-322 Szczecin, Poland
In this paper, we present a study on enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanospheres deposited on graphene
(n-TiO2 -G) in a process of coumarin oxidation. The enhancement of the photoactivity has been observed in respect to
commercial TiO2 P25. The presented material was prepared in two steps: (i) hydrolysis of titanium (IV) butoxide (TBT) in
ethanol solution with simultaneous deposition on graphene oxide (GO) and (ii) calcination of TiO2 -GO to form anatase-TiO2
and reduce GO to graphene. The nanomaterial was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier-Transformed Infrared spectroscopy and Raman
spectroscopy. In the presented photocatalytic process the fluorescence was used to detect • OH formed on a photo-illuminated
n-TiO2 -G surface using coumarin which readily reacted with • OH to produce highly fluorescent 7-hydroxycoumarin.
Keywords: graphene, TiO2 , photocatalyst, coumarin
c Wroclaw University of Technology.
1.
Introduction
In the past decades, TiO2 has gained a
great interest in photocatalysis area because it
is a promising material in many applications
connected with air and wastewater purification [1,
2]. Recently, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2
has been enhanced employing several methods
of its modification such as deposition of noble
metals [3], fluorination [4], doping [5] and other
functionalization processes [6]. One of the methods
to improve the photocatalytic performance of TiO2
is its deposition on graphene. Graphene is a
flat monolayer of carbon atoms, tightly packed
into a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice [7].
Because of its exceptional properties [8–10] this
material has attracted a great interest for potential
applications in many fields including electronic
devices, fuel cell technology, supercapacitors
or nanomedicine [11–13]. As graphene exhibits
∗ This
paper was presented at the Conference Functional and
Nanostructured Materials, FNMA 11, 6-9 September 2011,
Szczecin, Poland
† E-mail: mwojtoniszak@zut.edu.pl, Tel: +48 91 449 4772
high electron mobility, high surface area and
high adsorption capacities, it is a promising
material for supporting TiO2 photocatalyst [14].
Furthermore, graphene can improve an efficiency
of photo-conversion since it can act as an electron
transfer channel and reduce the photo-generated
electron holes [15]. So far, several methods
have been developed to synthesize TiO2 -graphene
nanocomposite [16, 17]. For instance, Guo
et al. reported sonochemical preparation of
the photocatalyst using TiCl4 as the substrate
of titanium dioxide [18]. They examined the
photocatalytic activity of the material in the
process of methylene blue degradation and
achieved the photocatalyst with higher activity than
commercial TiO2 . Wang et al. also stated that TiO2
nanocrystals deposited on graphene show enhanced
photocatalytic activity in the degradation of
rhodamine B in comparison to the TiO2 P25 [19].
Y. Zhang et al. studied the photocatalytic activity
of TiO2 P25/graphene composite, produced in
a thermal reaction of graphene oxide, during
methylene blue decomposition under visible light
irradiation [20]. T. Kamegawa et al. supported TiO2
on a mesoporous silica surface and the obtained
Photocatalytic performance of titania nanospheres deposited on graphene in coumarin oxidation
reaction
33
acquired from Aldrich. Ethanol was purchased
from Chempur. Coumarin was supplied by
Sigma-Aldrich.
2.2.
TiO2 /graphene preparation
Graphene
oxide
was
synthesized
using
Fig. 1. Formation of 7-hydroxycoumarin by the modified Hummers method [23]. The details
reaction between coumarin and • OH radicals.
on synthesis of TiO2 nanospheres deposited on
material coated with graphene [21]. The graphene
coating led to enhancement of photocatalytic
activity of TiO2 /silica for decomposition of
2-propanol in water in comparison to pristine
samples. Appropriate adsorption properties of
organics favor their transfer to the surface of
TiO2 . The photocatalytic performance of graphene
was also examined with other nanocrystals. T.
Xu et al. stated that ZnO/graphene nanocomposite
showed higher photocatalytic activity for the
degradation of methylene blue (MB) than pure
ZnO [22]. The authors argued that the enhancement
of photocatalytic activity of ZnO/graphene could
be attributed to the high migration efficiency
of photo-induced electrons and the inhibited
charge carriers recombination due to the electronic
interaction between ZnO and graphene.
In the present work, a recently optimized
material of titanium dioxide nanospheres adsorbed
on graphene in a model reaction of coumarin
photooxidation was employed. Coumarin was
chosen because it reacts with • OH radicals to
produce 7-hydroxycoumarin which is highly
fluorescent. Therefore, this reaction was performed
to test photocatalytic activity of n-TiO2 -G
during these radicals formation. The fluorescence
technique was applied to detect • OH. The reaction
of coumarin with hydroxyl radical is presented in
Fig. 1.
graphene are provided elsewhere [24]. Briefly, GO
was dispersed in ethanol (1 mg/mL) and a 10 wt.%
of TBT ethanol solution was added (GO:TBT
= 4:1, vol. ratio). The obtained suspension was
ultrasonicated and stirred simultaneously for
90 min. Then, the solution was stirred for 20 h at
room temperature. After this step, the mixture was
centrifuged (9000 rpm, 1 h), stirred in ethanol for
1 h and centrifuged again (9000 rpm, 1 h) in order
to remove the excess of titanium dioxide. Finally,
the material was annealed in vacuum (p = 10−7 bar)
at 400 ◦ C for 2 h to transit the TiO2 into anatase
phase and reduce the graphene oxide to graphene.
2.3.
Hydroxyl radical analysis
The formation of hydroxyl radicals (• OH) on
the surface of UV illuminated n-TiO2 -G was
detected by photoluminescence (PL) technique
using coumarin. Coumarin reacted with • OH
readily to produce a highly fluorescent product,
7-hydroxycoumarin. Experimental procedure was
as follows: 0,3 g of the catalyst was dispersed in
600 cm3 of 10−3 M coumarin aqueous solution.
The reaction mixture was mixed for 15 minutes
in darkness and then the suspension was exposed
to UV light. A medium pressure mercury lamp of
150 W was applied as a light source. The lamp
provided light of the wavelength ranging from 200
to 600 nm with the maximum intensity of 366 nm.
The fluorescence emission spectrum (excited at
332 nm) of the coumarin solution was measured
every 5 min of illumination. The fluorescence
2. Experimental
spectra were recorded on F-7000 Fluorescence
spectrometer (Hitachi). The photocatalytic activity
2.1. Materials
of n-TiO2 -G was compared to the commercial TiO2
Graphite was purchased from Alfa Aesar. P25. The dosage of TiO2 P25 containing the same
KMnO4 , sulfuric acid and orthophosphoric amount of Ti loading such as in n-TiO2 -G have
acid were obtained from POCH. TBT was been used.
34
2.4.
M. W OJTONISZAK et al.
Characterization
The morphology and chemical composition of
the sample was examined using high resolution
transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai
F30) and the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)
spectroscopy. Thermal stability of the materials
was investigated using SDT Q600 Simultaneous
TGA/DSC under air flow (100 mL/min) and at
the heating rate of 10 ◦ C/min. FT-IR absorption
spectra were recorded on Nicolet 6700 FT-IR
Spectrometer. The samples were prepared in KBr
tablets. Briefly, ∼0,5 mg of each measured sample
was mixed in a mortar with about 400 mg of
KBr and next pressed in a hydraulic press to
form a stable tablet. Raman spectra were recorded
usingVia Raman Microscope (Renishaw), with the
excitation wavelength of 514 nm.
3.
Results and discussion
The n-TiO2 -G photocatalyst was produced in
the hydrolysis process of TBT in ethanol solution
in the presence of graphene oxide followed by
calcination. The calcination step was performed in
order to form the anatase phase of titanium dioxide
and to remove oxygen-containing functional
groups from the graphene oxide. In this process
the anatase-TiO2 was deposited on graphene
surface. The morphology and composition of
the material was characterized using transmission
electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray
spectroscopy as its mode. Fig. 2A and 2B present
TEM images of the photocatalyst. On the basis
of detailed TEM analysis, the distribution of
the diameters was determined and the results
are presented in the Fig. 2C. According to the
study it was observed that the nanospheres with
diameters ranging from 100 nm to 250 nm were
deposited on the graphene. It was found that the
dominating fraction contains titania nanospheres
with a diameter between 176 nm and 200 nm.
Fig. 3 presents the EDX spectrum of the
prepared photocatalyst. The analysis did not detect
any elements other than Ti, O, C (Cu from TEM
grid), which fully confirms the composition of
titanium dioxide adsorbed on graphene.
In order to perform a quantitative analysis of the
photocatalyst the TGA was applied. The samples
were heated under air flow with the heating rate of
10 ◦ C/min. The TGA curves of GO and n-TiO2 -G
are presented in Fig. 4. Graphene oxide exhibits
mass loss between 150 ◦ C and 300 ◦ C which
is related to the removal of oxygen-containing
functional groups. A significant mass loss was
observed at the temperature range between 450 and
600 ◦ C for both GO and n–TiO2 –G. This happened
due to the pyrolysis of carbon skeleton [25]. In the
TGA curve of n-TiO2 -G there is no mass loss at
the temperature range between 150 ◦ C and 300 ◦ C,
which confirms a successful reduction of GO into
graphene during the calcination. The weight loss of
n-TiO2 -G was stabilized at approximately 95 wt.%
at the temperatures between 700 ◦ C and 800 ◦ C
indicating that the amount of graphene used as
titania support was about 5 wt.%.
For
further
characterization,
FT-IR
spectroscopy was used and the obtained spectra
of GO and n-TiO2 -G are presented in Fig. 5.
Graphene oxide depicts strong C-O absorption
peaks at 1010 cm−1 , 1070 cm−1 , 1170 cm−1
and 1270 cm−1 attributed to alkoxy, epoxy and
carboxyl groups. C=O stretching vibration peak
from carboxyl group is observed at approximately
1720 cm−1 . The absorption peaks at 1640 cm−1
and at 3450 cm−1 detected in each spectrum,
are attributed to C=C aromatic bond and O-H
vibration, respectively [26]. In the n-TiO2 -G
spectrum the peak related to the oxygen-containing
functional groups disappeared suggesting a
complete reduction of GO during the calcination.
In this spectrum strong peaks at 620 cm−1 ,
655 cm−1 and 678 cm−1 related to Ti-O-Ti bond
are observed [18, 27]. This fully confirms the
hydrolysis of titanium butoxide and the formation
of TiO2 . Furthermore, a peak at 1130 cm−1 is
ascribed to the vibration of Ti-O-C bond indicating
that titania nanospheres are chemically bounded
with graphene [28, 29].
To determine the crystal phase of the obtained
photocatalyst Raman spectroscopy was used. The
measurement was performed using an excitation
laser with a wavelength of 514 nm. According
Photocatalytic performance of titania nanospheres deposited on graphene in coumarin oxidation
reaction
35
Fig. 2. TEM images of n-TiO2 -G (A, B) and the distribution of the diameters of TiO2 nanospheres (C).
to Ohsaka [30], the Raman spectrum of anatase
crystal exhibits six modes at the following
positions: 144 cm−1 (Eg ), 197 cm−1 (Eg ),
399 cm−1 (B1g ), 513 cm−1 (A1g ), 519 cm−1
(B1g ), and 639 cm−1 (Eg ). In Fig. 6 the Raman
spectrum of n-TiO2 -graphene is presented. It is
clearly seen that this spectrum consists of all
modes characteristic of anatase. In addition, the
modes corresponding to graphene are present at
1358 cm−1 and 1596 cm−1 . The first – D band – is a
breathing mode of A1g symmetry in carbon lattice.
The second – G band – originates from the in-plane
vibration of sp2 carbon atoms (E2g symmetry) [31].
irradiation time are shown in Figs. 7a and 7b,
respectively. It can be clearly seen that a gradual
increase in the fluorescence intensity at ∼460 nm
is observed with increasing the irradiation time.
It is known that the fluorescence at ∼460 nm
is characteristic of 7-hydroxycoumarin [32]. This
confirms that fluorescent 7-hydroxycoumarin was
formed during the photocatalytic reaction on
n-TiO2 -graphene and TiO2 P25 due to the reaction
between • OH and coumarin (see Fig. 7).
Fig. 8 shows the plots of fluorescence intensity
at 460 nm versus irradiation time. The linear
increase of the fluorescence intensity up to
The changes of fluorescence emission spectra 30 min of UV illumination has been observed.
•
for the coumarin solution, excited at 332 nm in This phenomenon is a result of OH radicals
the presence of n-TiO2 -G and TiO2 P25, with generation on the n-TiO2 -G and TiO2 P25 surface,
36
M. W OJTONISZAK et al.
Fig. 6. Raman spectrum of n-TiO2 -G photocatalyst.
Fig. 3. EDX spectrum of n-TiO2 -G.
Fig.
Fig. 4. TGA curves of graphene oxide and n-TiO2 -G.
Fig. 5. FT-IR spectra of graphene oxide and n-TiO2 -G.
7. Fluorescence spectral changes during
illumination of n-TiO2 -G (a) and TiO2 P25 (b)
in aqueous solution of coumarin (excitation at
332 nm).
which is proportional to the irradiation time and
therefore, described by zero-order kinetics [33].
Moreover, the formation rate of • OH on the
n-TiO2 -graphene is much larger than that of TiO2
P25. Recently, Q. Xiang et al. reported that the
formation rate of • OH on the surface of irradiated
commercial P25 was much higher than that of other
semiconductors [32]. In this paper we present an
enhanced photocatalytic activity of anatase-TiO2
nanospheres adsorbed on graphene in comparison
to the commercial ones. The higher activity may
be due to chemical bonding between TiO2 and
graphene. Because graphene exhibits excellent
electronic transport properties, it favors a better
separation of the photogenerated electron-hole
pairs and prevents their recombination.
Photocatalytic performance of titania nanospheres deposited on graphene in coumarin oxidation
reaction
Fig. 8. Plots of the induced fluorescence intensity at
460 nm versus irradiation time for coumarin on
TiO2 P25 and n-TiO2 -graphene photocatalysts.
4.
Conclusions
We
presented
characterization
and
photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanospheres
deposited on graphene in a model reaction of
coumarin oxidation. The material was synthesized
in a facile TBT hydrolysis in ethanol solution
with simultaneous deposition on GO followed
by calcination of TiO2 -GO to form anatase-TiO2
and reduce GO to graphene. The prepared
photocatalyst was composed of graphene (5 wt.%)
chemically bonded with TiO2 nanospheres and
exhibited an enhanced photocatalytic activity in
comparison to the commercial TiO2 P25. The
high photoactivity of n-TiO2 -graphene can be
explained by the remarkable electronic transport
properties which favor better separation of the
photogenerated electron-hole pairs and prevent
their recombination. Hence, the material is a
promising photocatalyst in different photocatalytic
reactions which are currently under investigations.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the financial support of
Foundation for Polish Science within FOCUS 2010 Program.
References
[1] TARANTO J., FROCHOT D., PICHAT P., Sep. Pur.
Techn., 67 (2009), 187.
[2] PEKAKIS P.A., XEKOUKOULOTAKIS N.P.,
37
MANTZAVINOS D., Wat. Res., 40 (2006), 1276.
[3] SUBRAMANIAN V.E., WOLF E., KAMAT P.V., J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 126 (2004), 4943.
[4] HWAJIN K., WONYONG C., Appl. Cat. B: Environ.,
69 (2007), 127.
[5] KAMAT P.V., Pure Appl. Chem., 74 (2002), 1693.
[6] HUANG J., WANG X., HOU Y., CHEN X., WU L.,
WANG X., FU X., Microporous and Mesoporous Mat.,
110 (2008), 543.
[7] GEIM A.K., NOVOSELOV K.S., Nat. Mat., 6
(2007), 183.
[8] LI X.L., WANG X.R., ZHANG L., LEE S.W., DAI
H.J., Science, 319 (2008), 1229.
[9] BALANDIN A.A. et al., Nano Lett., 8 (2008), 902.
[10] LEE C., WEI X.D., KYSAR J.W., HONE J.,
Science, 321 (2008), 385.
[11] WANG X., ZHI L.J., MULLEN K., Nano Lett. 8, 323
(2008).
[12] CHEN S., ZHU J., WU X., HAN Q., WANG X., Acs
Nano, 4 (2010), 2822.
[13] CHANG Y. et al., Toxicol. Lett., 200 (2011), 201.
[14] YOO D.H. et al., Curr. Appl. Phys., 11 (2011), 805.
[15] ZHANG X.Y., LI H.P., CUI X.L., Chin. J. Inorg.
Chem., 25 (2009), 1903.
[16] WANG Y., SHI R., LIN J., ZHU Y., Appl. Cat. B:
Environ., 100 (2010), 179.
[17] ZHANG H., LV X., LI Y., WANG Y., LI J., Acs
Nano, 4 (2010), 380.
[18] GUO J., ZHU S., CHEN Z., LI Y., YU Z., LIU Q.,
LI J., FENG C., ZHANG D., Ultrason. Sonochem., 18
(2011), 1082.
[19] WANG F., ZHANG K., J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem., 345
(2011), 101.
[20] ZHANG Y., PAN C H ., J. Mater. Sci., 46 (2011), 2622.
[21] KAMEGAWA T., YAMAHANA D., YAMASHITA
H., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010), 15049.
[22] XU T., ZHANG L., CHENG H., ZHU Y., Appl.
Catal. B., 101 (2011), 382.
[23] MARCANO D.C. et al., Acs Nano, 4 (2010), 4806.
[24] WOJTONISZAK M., ZIELINSKA B., CHEN X.,
KALENCZUK R.J., BOROWIAK-PALEN E., J.
Mater. Sci., 47 (2012), 3185.
[25] JEONG H.K., LEE Y.P., JIN M.H., KIM E.S., BAE
J.J., LEE Y.H., Chem. Phys. Lett., 470 (2009), 258.
[26] LAZAR G., ZELLAMAA K., VASCAN I.,
STAMATE M., LAZAR I., RUSU I., J. Optoelectr.
and Adv. Mat., 7 (2005), 647.
[27] WANG G., WANG B., PARK J., YANG J., SHEN
X., YAO J., Carbon, 47 (2009), 68.
[28] KUMAR P.M., BADRINARAYANAN S., SASTRY
M., Thin Solid Films, 358 (2000), 122.
[29] MEROUANI A., AMARDIJA-ADNANI H.,
International Scientific Journal for Alternative Energy
and Ecology, 6 (2008), 151.
[30] OHSAKA T., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 48 (1980), 1661.
[31] FERRARI A.C., ROBERTSON J., Phys. Rev. B, 61
(2000), 14095.
38
M. W OJTONISZAK et al.
[32] XIANG Q., YU J., WONG P.K., J. Colloid Interf.
Sci., 357 (2011), 163.
[33] ISHIBASHI K., FUJISHIMA A., WATANABE T.,
HASHIMOTO K., Electrochem. Commun., 2 (2000),
207.
Received 2012-03-09
Accepted 2012-05-07