Journal of Physics: Conference Series
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
The Application of Inquiry Learning to Train Critical Thinking Skills on
Light Material of Primary School Students
To cite this article: Suryanti et al 2018 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1108 012128
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 107.172.84.220 on 05/12/2018 at 12:01
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
The Application of Inquiry Learning to Train Critical
Thinking Skills on Light Material of Primary School Students
Suryanti1, I S Z Arifin2, U Baginda3
1
Primary Teacher Education Program of Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Physics Education Program of Universitas Negeri Surabaya
3
Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Surabaya
2
*Corresponding author: suryanti@unesa.ac.id
Abstract. Critical thinking skills are seen as important skills for survival and have become one
of Indonesia's educational goals. The results of initial observation of critical thinking skills in
Kemangsen 2 primary school involving students of grade V, revealed that 95% students
possessed score 2 (with the scale, ranging from 1 to 4). Therefore, critical thinking skills of
students need to be improved by applying hands-based learning of Hands on Science; one of
which is through inquiry learning. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness
of inquiry learning model in trained critical thinking skills of elementary students (n = 22).
This research was conducted by One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Data were analyzed using
t-dependent tests for overall critical thinking skills and descriptive analysis for critical thinking
skills for each indicator. The critical thinking skills trained in this study include evaluation,
explanation, interpretation, and inference based on the results of data analysis. To sum up,
inquiry learning is classified as effective in terms of training students' critical thinking skills.
The critical thinking skills of students should be continuously trained on appropriate materials
or topics.
1. Introduction
Critical thinking is seen as an important skill for the survival of the 21st century [1]. The skills to think
critically is not only necessary in analyzing the various information but also important in the
individual and social aspects [2]. Critical thinking helps to decide about a person's way of life. In
everyday life, we need to have high selection skills in dealing with different situations in life [3]. All
these capabilities make it possible for greater success at school, at work and at home [4]. The skills to
think critically will form a critical attitude is actually meant to invite us to think clearly to help
ourselves get the right knowledge and understanding [5].
Critical thinking is seen as an essential skill for 21st century survival and education experts agree
that encouraging students to think critically is an essential requirement of the educational system [6].
Rahma [7] critical thinking skills are one of the most important educational goals in all levels of
education. Critical thinking skills is unnatural innate in every human being since birth so it can be
taught to the students [8]. Critical thinking can be taught, and not just for "talented" students but for all
students [9]. The skills to think critically can be improved and developed by way of practice [10].
Students may not be able to think critically when their teachers are unable to integrate sufficient
critical thinking into the practice of daily learning [11]. Teachers in this case have an important role in
trained skills to think critically to students at every level of education. [12] the skills to think critically
should be developed from an early age. In elementary level, critical thinking skills can be taught to
fourth, fifth and sixth graders because it is in accordance with students' cognitive development at the
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
1
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
abstract operational stage [13]. Critical thinking skills is not only a skill that needs to be taught in
schools but has become one of the goals of Indonesian education should be trained.
Science is concerned with a systematic way of finding out about nature, so science is not just a
collection of knowledge in the form of facts, concepts, or principles but also a process of discovery
[14]. Filsaime [15] argues that critical thinking skills are needed in digging and getting to know the
science so that students can master the workings taken in studying nature and solving problems related
to daily life. Contextual thinking skills are contextual so that their application in science education
includes a focus on tasks, problems, and issues that exist in the curriculum that require critical thinking
skills [16]. From the above description, it shows that critical thinking skills can be developed on the
materials that have been available in the curriculum that have characteristic fit with critical thinking
skills.
Critical thinking must go through argumentation, reasoning, and inferences [22]. From the
exposition, the trained aspects must contain elements of argumentation (argument evaluation),
explanation and inference (inference and interpretation). The critical thinking indicators to be
investigated include explanation, interpretation, inference, and evaluating arguments. [23] Inquiry
learning is a dynamic learning approach to which involves exploring, asking, making discoveries, and
testing discoveries to seek new insights. Hands-on science learning such as inquiry can help students
think critically and give students confidence in their skills to solve a problem [17]. Inquiry learning is
student center learning [18] to build critical thinking skills, reasoning and subsequent creativity [19].
[20] explaining that inquiry-based learning techniques can encourage students' critical thinking skills.
[21] inquiry learning is a dynamic learning approach to which involves exploring, asking, making
discoveries, and testing discoveries to seek new insights. The focus of this research is to describe the
critical thinking skills in the topic of the properties of light by using learning inquiry mend the skills of
critical thinking in students.
2. Methods
The research method used in this research is quasi experiment or Weak Experimental Design, with the
basic pattern "The One Group Pretest - Posttest Design" and descriptive method. Subjects in this study
are the students of grade V of Kemangsen primary school in the academic year 2014-2015. The
subject of the research are 22 students, with 12 male students and 10 female students. Critical thinking
skills trained using inquiry learning in light topic. This research was conducted on light material in
science teaching by using inquiry model. The scoring criteria used are the modified rubric score from
Facione [24] (the solo taxonomic rubric as Table 1 follows).
Table 1. Indicator of Critical Thinking Skill of Student Science through Inquiry Learning.
Indicator
Interpretations
Inference
Explanation
Information
Students can’t make interpretations the data provided
Students make interpretations of the data provided but wrong and not in
accordance with the context of the problem
Students interpret the data given incorrectly but in accordance with the context
of the problem
Students interpret the data given correctly and according to the context of the
problem but not complete
Students interpret the data correctly, according to the context of the problem and
complete
Did not make any conclusions.
Make inaccurate conclusions and not in accordance with the context of the
question.
Make inaccurate conclusions, though tailored to the context of the question.
Make conclusions appropriately, according to context but not complete.
Make conclusions appropriately, contextually and completely
Did not make any explanation.
Make an inappropriate explanation and not in accordance with the context of
the question.
2
Score
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
0
1
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
Indicator
Evaluate
arguments
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
Information
Make an inappropriate explanation even if adapted to the context of the
question.
Make annotations appropriately, in context but not complete.
Make Explanations appropriately, contextually and exhaustively
Do not evaluate arguments from statements given
Provide an evaluation of the arguments of the statements given but are not
appropriate and not in accordance with the context of the problem.
Provide an evaluation of the arguments of the statements given incorrectly,
even though they are adapted to the context of the problem.
Provide an evaluation of the arguments from the statements given correctly,
logically but incompletely.
Provide an evaluation of the arguments from the statements given correctly,
logically and completely.
Score
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
4
Data analysis is divided into 2 parts, namely analysis of each indicator of critical thinking skills
and analysis of critical thinking skills as a whole. The percentage of critical thinking skills obtained
from the calculation is then categorized according to Table 2 below.
Table 2. Category Percentage of Critical Thinking Skills [25].
Interpretations
81,25 < X ≤ 100
71,5 < X . 81,25
62,5 < X ≤ 71,5
43,75 < X . 62,5
0 < X ≤ 43,75
Category
Very high
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
Analysis of critical thinking skills as a whole is done by using hypothesis testing using t-test.
Before, performing the t-test it is necessary to test the normality to test that the sample data comes
from normally distributed populations or not. Normality test used in this study using the KolmogrovSmirnov normality test. If the normality test obtained normal distributed data then the data calculation
using parametric statistical method that is using test-t dependent sample or Paired t-Test.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The result of critical thinking skills of each indicator.
The result of students' critical thinking skills of class V can be known from the evaluation result done
at a pretest and a posttest. The result of evaluation of students 'critical thinking skills for each indicator
in Table 3 below is done by using descriptive method measured based on the scoring guidance of
students' critical thinking skills.
Table 3. Frequency Distribution of Critical Thinking Skill in a Pretest
Indicator
Category
81,25 < X ≤ 100
71,5 < X . 81,25
62,5 < X ≤ 71,5
43,75 < X . 62,5
0 < X ≤ 43,75
Very high
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
Interpretations
F
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
13,63
19
86,37
22
100
Indicator
Inference Explanation Evaluate arguments
F
%
f
%
F
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5 28,73 4 18.18 5
28,73
17 72,27 18 81,82 17
72,27
22 100
22
100
22
100
3
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
Based on Table 3, critical thinking skills each indicator on the pretest of each indicator has a very
low and low category. This result indicates that the capacity critical thinking skill student is very low.
This was not attributed to the role of teachers who had not yet maximally and sustainable trying to
involve the students in the activities of a critical thinking skill can even standard intellectual a basis for
the capacity critical thinking skill usually not to be taught in schools. The Frequency Distribution of
Critical Thinking Skill in a Posttest is shown in Table 4 below.
Table 4. Frequency Distribution of Critical Thinking Skill in a Posttest
Indicator
Category
81,25 < X ≤ 100
71,5 < X . 81,25
62,5 < X ≤ 71,5
43,75 < X . 62,5
0 < X ≤ 43,75
Very high
High
Medium
Low
Very Low
Interpretations
F
%
16
72,73
6
27,27
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
100
Indicator
Inference Explanation Evaluate arguments
F
%
F
%
F
%
17 77,27 18 81,82 14
63,63
5 22,73 2
9,10
3
13,63
0
0
1
4,54
2
9,10
0
0
1
4,54
2
9,10
0
0
0
0
1
4,54
22 100
22
100
22
100
Table 4 shows that learning inquiry having a fairly significant effect to train critical thinking skill.
One pf the four indicators, indicators evaluate argument having the lower in of appeals that other.
Analytical capability this requires a exercise seamless and intellectual level adequate. Learning inquiry
to boost the ability of investigation requires students to connect the investigation by scientific
knowledge causing the students to uses reasoning scientific and critical thinking in developing
concepts on the science. The data of critical thinking skills of each indicator presented in the
following table 5.
3.1.1. Indicator 1: Interpretation.
Based on Table 5, it can be seen that there is a significant increase in interpretation skills after
inquiry learning. In the phase of collecting and processing student data in demand to be able to do 2
aspects of interpretation are: 1) linking the results of observations and 2) finding the pattern of data
relationships in observation. This is in line with the opinion of Carlson [26] which states that inquiry
learning applied in the learning process can improve students' skills in making observations and put
forward answers to a problem through data interpretation to obtain conclusion. Inquiry learning not
only requires students to be able to conduct the investigative process independently, but also requires
students to be able to understand the implications of an experimental result. The Percentage of critical
thinking skills of each indicator is shown in Table 5 below.
Table 5. Percentage of critical thinking skills of each indicator
Indicator critical
thinking skills
Pretest
Posttest
Percentage (%)
Category
Percentage
(%)
85,27
Category
Interpretations
36,36
Very Low
Very high
Inference
38,59
Very Low
86,37
Very high
Explanation
39,02
Very Low
84,06
Very high
Evaluate arguments
34,45
Very Low
78,02
High
3.1.2. Indicator 2: Inference.
Based on these data it can be concluded that students' critical thinking skills of inference
increases significantly after inquiry learning is done on the students. Inference is one of the activities
needed in inquiry learning especially in phase IV collecting and processing data. [27] which states
4
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
that inquiry learning requires direct experience of inquiry and practice on an ongoing basis so that
students are not limited to understanding questions by learning words like "hypothesis" and
"inference" or with memorize procedures but students gain a deep understanding of the characteristics
of the steps of the scientific method.
3.1.3. Indicator 3: Explain.
Based on the data it can be concluded that the skills Student's critical thinking indicator improved
significantly after inquiry learning was conducted on the students. The high critical thinking skills of
students in this indicator is not separated from the role of inquiry learning in the fifth phase of
presenting the results of the investigation. In this phase students are given the opportunity to explain
the results of their inquiry directly by presenting in front of the class or indirectly by using the
question, given the opportunity to obtain a meaningful understanding of the concept [27] reveals that
the inquiry learning model develops understanding skills.
3.1.4. Indicator 4: Evaluate the argument.
The indicator evaluating the argument is an indicator of critical thinking skills that obtains the lowest
percentage of skills compared to other indicators trained in both pretest and posttest. Based on these
data it can be concluded that students' critical thinking skills to evaluate arguments increased
significantly after inquiry learning was done on the students. The teacher provides some statements or
arguments related to the investigation that have been done then the students are instructed to be able to
evaluate the given argument whether the argument whether the argument is the 2000 National
Research Council (NRC) in Olson and Horsley [27]. Inquiry learning model can train students to build
answers and think smartly in finding various alternative solutions to the problems posed by teachers.
3.2 Outcomes of overall critical thinking skills
Overall critical thinking skills were analyzed using N-gain and t-test. In table 6 can be concluded there
is improvement of critical thinking skills of student before and after conducting inquiry study. This
finding is in line with Estes [28] explaining that inquiry learning is capable of developing critical
thinking skills and abilities in science literacy. Martin [29] which states that students who are taught
science by using inquiry in primary school can develop literacy skills in science, independent thinking,
critical thinking, and problem solving. In improving students' critical thinking skills. The Data Paired
Samples Test critical thinking Skill is shown in Table 6 below.
Table 6. Data Paired Samples Test critical thinking Skill.
Mean
Pair 1
pretest –
-46,30591
posttest
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Std.
Std. Error
Deviation
Mean
Lower
Upper
7,95090
1,69514
-49,83114
T
-42,78068 -27,317
df
21
Sig. (2tailed)
,000
4. Conclusion
Inquiry learning can be used to train students' critical thinking skills. Inquiry learning students will be
actively involved in learning both physically and mentally (hands on activity) through experimenting
activities, observing, asking, analyzing data, and making conclusions. Student centered inquiry
learning has been shown to improve students' critical thinking skills. Critical thinking skills of the
students to continue to develop should be to trained critical thinking skill continuously adjusted with
the characteristics of learning that one of them using inquiry learning.
Reference
[1] Corich SP. 2011. Automating the Measurement of Critical Thinking in Discussion Forum.
Disertasi. Palmerston North. Massey Universities. Available from:
5
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
Hashemi SA. 2011. The Use of Critical Thinking in Social Science Textbooks of High School: A
field Study of Fars Province in Iran. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 4, No. 1, 63-77.
Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522910
Hashemi, SA. 2011. The Use of Critical Thinking in Social Science Textbooks of High School:
A field Study of Fars Province in Iran. International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 4, No. 1, 63-77.
Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED522910
Starkey L, Critical Thinking Skills Succes in 10 Minutes A Day. Second edition. New York:
Express Learning. 2010.
Molan M, Logika Ilmu dan Seni Berpikir Kritis. Jakarta: PT. Indeks. 2012.
Corich SP, Automating the Measurement of Critical Thinking in Discussion Forum. Disertasi.
Palmerston North. Massey Universities. 2011. Available from:
Rahma AN, Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Inkuiri Berpendekatan SETS
Meteri Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan untuk Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis
dan Empati Siswa Terhadap Lingkungan. Vol. JERE 1, No. 2, 133-138. Journal of Educational
Research and Evaluation. 2012
Fahim M, Manipulating Critical Thinking Skills in the Test Taking. Vol. 4, No. 1, 153-160.
International Journal of Education. 2012.
Ruggiero RV, Becoming a Critical Thinker: A Master Student Text. A Sixth edition. New
York: Houhton Mifflin Company. Choy, S. C. dan San Oo, P. 2012. Reflective Thinking and
Precursor for Incorporating Critical Thinking into the Classroom?. Vol. 2, (1), 167-182.
International Journal of Instruction. 2009.
Fahim M, Manipulating Critical Thinking Skills in the Test Taking. Vol. 4, (1), 153-160.
International Journal of Education. 2012.
Choy SC and San OoP. Reflective Thinking and Precursor for Incorporating Critical Thinking
into the Classroom?. Vol. 2, (1), 167-182. International Journal of Instruction. 2012.
King A, Designing The Instructional Process To Enhance Critical Thingking Across The
Curiculum. Inquiryng Minds Really Do Want to Know : Using Questioning to Teach Critical
Thinking. Vol.22, (1), 13-17. Society For The Teaching Of Psicology. 1995.
Adams JW, A Case Study: Using Lesson Study to Understand Factors That Affect Teaching
Creative and Critical Thinking in the Elementary Classroom. Disertasi. Philadelphia: Drexel
University. 2013. Available from:
http://idea.library.drexel.edu/bitstream/1860/4131/1/Adams_JanetEdD.pdf
BNSP, Standar isi 2006 mata pelajaran IPA SD. Jakarta. Depdiknas. P.484. 2006.
Filsaime and Dennis K, Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif. Jakarta: Prestasi
Pustakaraya. 2008.
Bailin S, Critical Thinking and Science Education. Journal Science and Education. Vol 11,
361-375. 2002.
Molan M, Logika Ilmu dan Seni Berpikir Kritis. Jakarta: PT. Indeks. 2012.
Spencer TL and Walker TM, Creating a Love for Science for Elementary Students through
Inquiry-based Learning. Vol. 4, (2), 18-24. Journal of Virginia Science Education. 2011.
Paulu N and Martin M. 1992. Helping Your Child Learn Science. New York:
U.S.
Departement of Education Office of Educational Reasearch and Improvment. 1992.
Spencer TL and Walker TM, Creating a Love for Science for Elementary Students through
Inquiry-based Learning. Vol. 4, (2), 18-24. Journal of Virginia Science Education. 2011.
Ibrahim M Dkk, Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar : Hakikat IPA, Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan, Media Pembelajaran, Perancangan Pembelajaran sampai kepada ciri Guru
Profesional. Surabaya : Unesa Press. 2010.
Lampert N 2011 A study of an after-school art programme and critical thinking International
Journal of Education through Art 7(1) pp 55-67
Spencer TL and Walker TM 2011 Creating a Love for Science for Elementary Students through
Inquiry-based Learning Journal of Virginia Science Education 4(2) 18-24.
6
MISEIC 2018
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
1108 (2018)
1234567890
‘’“” 012128
IOP Publishing
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
[24] Facione PA 1990 Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of
Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delpy Report. California: California Academic
Press)
[25] Studijos K 2006 Developing Critical Thinking through Cooperative Learning Studies About
Languages NR(9) 77-84
[26] Lampert N 2011 A study of an after-school art programme and critical thinking International
Journal of Education through Art 7(1) pp 55-67.
[27] Parr B and Edwards MC 2004 Inquiry Based Instruction in Secondary Agricultural Education:
Problem Solving an Old Friend Revisited Journal of Agricultural Education 45(4) pp. 106-117
[28] Setyowati A 2011 Implementasi Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Fisika untuk
Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika 7 89-96
[29] Sanjaya W 2010 Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan (Jakarta:
Kencana Prenada Media Group)
7