Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
DEM based geomorphometric analyses of karst surface in the Republic of Macedonia Marjan Temovski1, Ivica Milevski2 1 2 SK Zlatovrv, Prilep, Republic of Macedonia; temovski_m@yahoo.com Institute of Geography, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, ivica@iunona.pmf.ukim.edu.mk Introduction Karst is significant part of the landscape in Republic of Macedonia (numerous dolines and karren features, few active karst poljes, large fluviokarstic areas, numbers of karst beveled surfaces, more than 400 caves) Karst water resources are important part of the water supply system. Karst rocks - mostly Precambrian marbles and Triassic limestones, with also Paleozoic marbles and carbonate schists, Jurassic and Cretaceous limestones, Pleistocene tufaceous limestones, tufa and travertines, and also Cretaceous gypsum and anhydrite. Introduction Karst surface area in Republic of Macedonia: Analog approach: • 9.6 % (Andonovski, 1981) • .4 % (Kolčakovski & Boškovska, 2007) Digital approach: • 12 % (Temovski, 2012) • Digital map and database (rock type, rock age) • No geomorphometric study! Methodology Data: • Vector data (karst rock outcrops) digitized from 100k General Geological Map of Macedonia (Temovski, 2012) • 15 m DEM of the Republic of Macedonia interpolated from 5m TIN-like detailed DEM of AREC-RM (Agency for Real Estate and Cadastre of the Republic of Macedonia); Best quality DEM for the R. of Macedonia with horizontal and vertical accuracy of +/- 2.2 m (Milevski et al., 2013, Milevski, 2014) Analyses: • Morphometric analyses of of hypsometry, slope and aspect were performed using Spatial Analyst Tool in ArcGIS 10.1 • Slope type analyses with SAGA GIS v.2 modules • • • Average elevation is 1100.4 m Range from 74.6 m to 2743.9 m Major concentration of karst surface areas between hypsometric classes of 500 and 1500 m (reflection of mountainous regions) % of total karst area Results - hypsometry 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Elevation classes (m) 1 • Major karst rocks : Peak distribution in classes of 800-900 m, 900-1000 m (marbles) and 1400-1500 m, 1500-1600 m (limestones) Minor karst rocks: Tufaceous limestones, tufa and travertines found at lower elevation (youngest rocks); carbonate schist & marbles and dolomites have wide vertical distribution 3 total karst surface (1), marble (2) & limestone outcrops (3) 0.60 % of total karst area • 2 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Elevation classes (m) 1 2 3 4 tufaceous limestone, tufa & travertine outcrops (1); carbonate schist & marble outcrops (2); dolomite outcrops (3); and gypsum & anhydrite outcrops (4) Results - slope 18.00 • Average slope is 20.6° Higher than the average of the country (15.4°) Only 35 % of the karst surface has <20° (mostly reflection of deeply incised fluvio-karstic landscapes) 16.00 % of total karst area • • 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 Slope classes (°) 1 • • Marble (20.1°) and limestone (20.5°) have almost same average slope, with carbonate schist & marbles having similar slope (19.2°) Gypsum & anchydrite (29.7°) and dolomite (23.2°) have the highest average slope Tufaceous limestone, tufa & travertine have the lowest average (9.7°), mostly preserving the low depositional slopes 3 total karst surface (1), marble (2) & limestone outcrops (3) 0.80 0.70 % of total karst area • 2 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Slope classes (°) 1 2 3 4 tufaceous limestone, tufa & travertine outcrops (1); carbonate schist & marble outcrops (2); dolomite outcrops (3); and gypsum & anhydrite outcrops (4) Results - aspect 40 1 – total karst area, 2 – marble, 3 – limestone, 4 – tufaceous limestone, tufa & travertine, 5 – carbonate schist & marble, 6 – dolomite, 7 – gypsum & anhydrite 35 30 % 25 • • 20 15 10 5 0 2 • • 3 4 5 6 7 Generally even distribution Eastern (67.5-112.5°) and western (247.5292.5°) exposition have slightly higher percentage 1 All lithologies show similar distribution Dolomite and especially gypsum & anhydrite have more significant southern and southeastern expositions (reflection of local extension of outcrops) • Small areas (<1%) – does not reflect on the total karst surface aspect distribution Results - plan & profile curvature Plan curvature Area (%) Profile curvature Area (%) < -0.01 14.0 < -0.001 23.2 -0.01 to -0.005 9.3 -0.001 to -0.0005 9.5 -0.005 to 0.005 47.8 -0.0005 to 0.0005 28.7 0.005 to 0.01 15.0 0.0005 to 0.001 9.4 > 0.001 13.9 > 0.001 29.2 • • • Negative values indicate concave slopes, positive values correspond to convex terrains and values near zero indicate linear slopes (Dikau, 1989) Large areas have linear downhill slope Convex terrains prevail with 28.9% (plan curvature) and 38.6% (profile curvature) In lower altitudes (<1500 m), concave curvature dominates, while in higher altitudes it is opposite Conclusion • First attempt at morphometric analyses of karst surface in the Republic of Macedonia • Results show some differences connected to lithological and climatic influence on karst development • Base for future more detailed analyses and possible automated classification of exokarst features. • Example: cluster classification of karst landscape (Jakupitsa karst area) using slope angle, profile, cross-sectional and tangential curvature. Class Slope Curvature Area % Feature 1 10-20 -0.001 - -0.0005 7.8 Karst valley bottoms, poljes and sinkholes 2 10-20 >0.001 8.6 Karst ridges and peaks 3 20-30 -0.0005 - 0.0005 21.1 4 30-50 -0.0005 - 0.0005 49.9 5 0-10 -0.0005 - 0.0005 12.6 Karst valley sides Steep straight slopes, escarpments Karst planation areas Thank you for your attention!