LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Growing Not Dwindling
International Research on the
Worldwide Phenomenon of
Dissociative Disorders
To the Editor:
n the December 2012 issue of the Journal,
Joel Paris, MD, wrote an article about the
current status of dissociative identity disorder
(DID) and the dissociative disorder field in
general. He suggests that DID is merely a
‘‘fad’’ and that there is no credible evidence
to connect traumatic experiences with the
development of DID.
We refute several of the claims made
by Dr Paris.
Our biggest concern as nonYNorth
American researchers is that Dr Paris does
not reference a single international study related to dissociative disorders and DID,
despite the considerable and increasing empirical literature from around the world. His
speculation that DID is not diagnosed outside
clinics that specialize in treating dissociation
is not consistent with current data. DID and
dissociative disorders have been reliably
found in general psychiatric hospitals; psychiatric emergency departments; and private
practices in countries including England, the
Netherlands, Turkey, Puerto Rico, Northern
Ireland, Germany, Finland, China, and Australia, among many others (e.g., Dorahy et al.,
2006; Leonard et al., 2005; Lewis-Fernández
et al., 2007; Lipsanen et al., 2004; Martı́nezTaboas, 2005; Martı́nez-Taboas et al., 1995,
2006; Middleton and Butler, 1998; Rodewald
et al., 2011; Sar, 2006; Sar et al., 2007b, 1996;
Tutkun et al., 1998).
Much of the international research,
using sophisticated epidemiological and
clinical research methods, has replicated
dozens of times the finding that dissociative
processes and disorders (including DID) can
be reliably detected in a wide spectrum of
different societies. Epidemiological general
population studies indicate that 1.1% to 1.5%
meet diagnostic criteria for DID; and 8.6% to
18.3%, for any DSM-IV dissociative disorder
(Johnson et al., 2006; Sar et al., 2007a). The
international literature on DID and dissociative disorders has been widely published in
mainstream journals of psychiatry and psychopathology and is inconsistent with Dr Paris’s
conclusions.
Similarly, with regard to treatment, almost 300 patients from 18 countries participated in the most recent prospective treatment
study of DID and a closely related disorder,
dissociative disorder not otherwise specified
(Brand et al., 2012). Moreover, the authorship
of the 2011 International Society for the
Study of Trauma and Dissociation guidelines
I
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
for the treatment of DID included clinicians
from North America, Europe, the Middle
East, and Australasia.
Dr Paris also opines that there is only a
‘‘weak link’’ between child abuse and psychopathology, quoting an article published
17 years ago. Current research illustrates a very
different picture. Persons with early abusive
experiences demonstrate increased illnesses
(Green and Kimerling, 2004), impaired work
functioning (Lee and Tolman, 2006), serious
interpersonal difficulties (Van der Kolk and
d’Andrea, 2010), and a high risk for traumatic
revictimization (Rich et al., 2004). The Adverse
Childhood Experiences Study, an American
epidemiological study, has provided retrospective and prospective data from more than
17,000 individuals on the effects of traumatic
experiences during the first 18 years of life.
This large study demonstrated the enduring,
strongly proportionate, and frequently profound
relationship between adverse childhood experiences and emotional states, health risks, disease
burdens, sexual behavior, disability, and health
care costs, even decades later (Felitti and Anda,
2010). Specifically, child sexual abuse (CSA)
has been related in various epidemiological
studies to the subsequent onset of a variety of
psychiatric disorders. For example, Molnar
et al. (2001), using data from the National
Comorbidity Survey, found that CSA was associated with 14 psychiatric disorders among
women and 5 among men, even after controlling for other childhood adversities. Dinwiddie
et al. (2000), using a large database of Australian twins (N = 5,995), found that individuals
reporting CSA were much more likely to receive a psychiatric diagnosis and more likely to
report suicide attempts than were those who
were not sexually abused. In a populationbased sample of 1,411 female adult twins,
Kendler et al. (2000) found that CSA was significantly related to eating disorders and drug
problems. When the twin pairs were discordant
for the CSA, the abused twin was at a higher
risk for developing a psychiatric disorder.
More recently, Jonas et al. (2011), using a
sample of 7,403 individuals, demonstrated that
every psychiatric disorder they evaluated was
strongly related to CSA. The link between
childhood relational trauma and dissociation is
now solidly established in the empirical literature (e.g., Carlson et al., 2012; Dalenberg et al.,
2012).
In fact, stringently documented international research has made it almost impossible
not to appreciate what happens psychologically to children who grow up being abused
by the adults who were supposed to protect
them (Kezelman and Stavropoulos, 2012;
Middleton, 2013a, 2013b).
Dr Paris devotes a whole section of his
article to challenging a single case of reported
DID, published in the popular press by a
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
journalist (i.e., Nathan, 2011; Schreiber,
1973). This degree of attention to a single
popular press case is out of place in a serious academic review and also ignores another
work in the same popular press genre that
came to the opposite conclusion about that case
(Suraci, 2011). Given the scientific topic under
discussion, it would have been preferable for
Dr Paris to base his thesis on peer-reviewed,
empirical-driven, scientific data rather than on
a journalistic investigation in the popular press.
He insistently refers to seven popular books or
sensational press releases in his attempts to
sustain some of his arguments.
In conclusion, Dr Paris’s assessment of
the supposedly dwindling fad of DID and
dissociative disorders is not in keeping with
current peer-reviewed international research.
The dissociative disorder field has been producing solid and consistent evidence that
provides guidance to clinicians and researchers about the epidemiology, phenomenology,
diagnosis, and treatment of DID (and closely
related conditions). We agree that more research efforts should be dedicated to DID and
to dissociative disorders overall, along with the
impact of dissociation on the entire spectrum
of psychiatric disorders (Sar and Ross, 2006).
The epidemiological, laboratory, neurobiological, psychophysiological, and psychometric
research on dissociative disorders is abundant
and impressive. For whatever reasons, this research is inadequately represented in Dr Paris’s
article. This body of international researchers
(from four nonYNorth American continents)
refutes Dr Paris’s claims.
Alfonso Martı́nez-Taboas, PhD
Department of Psychology
Carlos Albizu University
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Martin Dorahy, PhD
Department of Psychology
University of Canterbury
Christchurch, New Zealand
Vedat Sar, MD
Department of Psychiatry
Istanbul University
Istanbul, Turkey
Warwick Middleton, MD
Department of Psychiatry
University of Queensland
St Lucia, Australia
Christa Krüger, MD
Department of Psychiatry
University of Pretoria
Pretoria, South Africa
DISCLOSURES
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
www.jonmd.com
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
353
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Letters to the Editor
REFERENCES
Brand BL, McNary SW, Myrick AC, Loewenstein RJ,
Classen CC, Lanius RA, Pain C, Putnam FW (2012)
A longitudinal, naturalistic study of dissociative
disorder patients treated by community clinicians.
Psychol Trauma. doi:10.1037/a0027654.
Carlson EB, Dalenberg C, McDade-Montez E (2012)
Dissociation in posttraumatic stress disorder part 1:
Definitions and review of research. Psychol Trauma.
4:479Y489.
Dalenberg CJ, Brand BL, Gleaves DH, Dorahy MJ,
Loewenstein RJ, Cardeña E, Frewen PA, Carlson
EB, Spiegel D (2012) Evaluation of the evidence
for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation.
Psychol Bull. 138:550Y588.
Dinwiddie S, Heath AC, Dunne MP, Bucholz KK,
Madden PAF, Slutske WS, Martin NG (2000) Early sexual abuse and lifetime psychopathology: A
co- twin-control study. Psychol Med. 30:41Y52.
Dorahy MJ, Mills H, Taggart C, O’Kane M, Mulholland
C (2006) Do dissociative disorders exist in the Northern Irish psychiatric population?: A blind diagnosticstructured interview assessment. Eur J Psychiatry.
20:172Y182.
Felitti VJ, Anda RF (2010) The relationship of adverse
childhood experiences to adult medical disease,
psychiatric disorders and sexual behavior: Implications for healthcare. In Lanius RA, Vermetten E,
Pain C (Eds), The impact of early life trauma on health
and disease (pp 77Y87). New York: Cambridge.
Green BL, Kimerling R (2004) Trauma, posttraumatic
stress disorder, and health status. In Schnurr PP, Green
BL (Eds), Trauma and health: Physical health consequences of exposure to extreme stress (pp 13Y42).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
International Society for the Study of Trauma and
Dissociation (2011) Guidelines for treating dissociative identity disorder in adults, 3rd revision. J Trauma
Dissociation. 12:115Y187.
Johnson JG, Cohen P, Kasen S, Brook JS (2006)
Dissociative disorders among adults in the community, impaired functioning, and axis I and II comorbidity. J Psychiatr Res. 40:131Y140.
Jonas S, Bebbington P, McManus S, Meltzer H, Jenkins
R, Kuipers E, Brugha T (2011) Sexual abuse and
psychiatric disorder in England: Results from the
2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Psychol
Med. 41:709Y719.
Kendler KS, Bulik CM, Silberg J, Hettema JM, Myers
J, Prescott CA (2000) Childhood sexual abuse and
adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in
women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 57:953Y959.
Kezelman C, Stavropoulos P (2012) Best practice
guideline for complex trauma (trauma specific)
and trauma informed care and practice. Sydney,
Australia: Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA).
Lee S, Tolman R (2006) Childhood sexual abuse and
adult work outcomes. Soc Work Res. 30:83Y92.
Leonard D, Brann S, Tiller J (2005) Dissociative disorders: Pathways to diagnosis, clinician attitudes and
their impact. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 39:940Y946.
Lewis-Fernández R, Martı́nez-Taboas A, Sar V, Patel
S, Boatin A (2007) The cross-cultural assessment
of dissociation. In Wilson JP (Ed), Cross-cultural
assessment of post-traumatic stress disorder and
trauma (pp 279Y317). New York: Springer.
Lipsanen T, Korkeila J, Peltola P, Järvinen J, Langen K,
Lauerma H (2004) Dissociative disorders among
psychiatric patients: Comparison with a nonclinical
sample. Eur Psychiatry. 19:53Y55.
Martı́nez-Taboas A (2005) From obscurity to daylight:
The study of dissociation in Puerto Rico. J Trauma
Pract. 4:271Y285.
Martı́nez-Taboas A, Camino R, Cruz-Gartúa A, Francia M,
Gelpı́ E, Rodrı́guez-Cay J (1995) What a group of
354
www.jonmd.com
clinicians have learned about multiple personality disorder in Puerto Rico. Rev Puertorriq Psicol. 10:197Y213.
Martı́nez-Taboas A, Canino G, Wang MQ, Garcı́a P,
Bravo M (2006) Prevalence and victimization correlates of pathological dissociation in a community
simple of youths. J Trauma Stress. 19:439Y448.
Middleton W (2013a) Parent-child incest that extends
into adulthood: A survey of international press
reports. J Trauma Dissociation. 14:184Y197.
Middleton W (2013b) Ongoing incestuous abuse during adulthood. J Trauma Dissociation. 14:184Y197.
Middleton W, Butler J (1998) Dissociative identity
disorder: An Australian series. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 32:794Y804.
Molnar BE, Buka SL, Kessler RC (2001) Child sexual
abuse and subsequent psychopathology: Results
from the National Comorbidity Survey. Am J Public
Health. 91:753Y760.
Nathan D (2011) Sybil exposed. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
Rich CL, Combs-Lane AM, Resnick HS, Kilpatrick
DG (2004) Child sexual abuse and adult sexual
revictimization. In Koenig LJ, Doll LS, O’Leary
A, Pequegnat W (Eds), From child sexual abuse to
adult sexual risk (pp 49Y68). Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
Rodewald F, Wilhelm-GöQling C, Emrich HM,
Reddemann L, Gast U (2011) Axis-I comorbidity
in female patients with dissociative identity disorder
and dissociative identity disorder not otherwise
specified. J Nerv Ment Dis. 199:122Y131.
Sar V (2006) The scope of dissociative disorders: An
international perspective. Psychiatr Clin North Am.
29:227Y244.
Sar V, Akyüz G, Dogan O (2007a) Prevalence of
dissociative disorders among women in the general
population. Psychiatry Res. 149:169Y176.
Sar V, Koyuncu A, Ozturk E, Yargic LI, Kundakci T,
Yazici A, Kuskonmaz E, Aksüt D (2007b) Dissociative disorders in psychiatric emergency ward.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 29:45Y50.
Sar V, Ross CA (2006) Dissociative disorders as a
confounding factor in psychiatric research. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 29:129Y144.
Sar V, YargN0 LI, Tutkun H (1996) Structured interview
data on 35 cases of dissociative identity disorder in
Turkey. Am J Psychiatry. 153:1329Y1333.
Schreiber FR (1973) Sybil. New York: Henry Regnery.
Suraci P (2011) Sybil in her own words: The Untold
Story of Shirley Mason, her multiple personalities
and paintings. New York: Abandoned Ladder Press.
Tutkun H, Sar V, YargN0 LI, Özpulat T, YanNk M,
KNzNltan E (1998) Frequency of dissociative disorders among psychiatric inpatients in a Turkish university clinic. Am J Psychiatry. 155:800Y805.
Van der Kolk BA, d’Andrea W (2010) Towards developmental trauma disorder diagnosis for childhood
interpersonal trauma. In LaniusRA, VermettenE,
PainC (Eds), The impact of early life trauma on
health and disease (pp 57Y68). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Disinformation About
Dissociation
Dr Joel Paris’s Notions About
Dissociative Identity Disorder
To the Editor:
e write to record our objections to both
the form and the content of Dr Joel
W
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
Paris’s recent article entitled The Rise and
Fall of Dissociative Identity Disorder (Paris,
2012). His claim that dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a ‘‘medical fad’’ is simply wrong,
and he provides no substantive evidence to
support his claim. From the mistaken identification of Pierre Janet as a psychiatrist in
the first line (Janet was the most famous psychologist of his day), it is replete with errors,
false claims, and lack of scholarship and just
plainly ignores the published literature.
Dr Paris provided a highly biased article
that is based on opinion rather than on science.
His review of the literature is extremely selective. Of 48 references, Dr Paris cites exactly 7
peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 onward (7/48 references equals 14%) and only
8 peer-reviewed, data-driven articles from
before 2000 (8/48 equals 16%). Rather than
relying on the recent peer-reviewed, scientific
literature, Paris relied almost entirely on the
nonYpeer-reviewed books, including a popular
press book written by a journalist whose methods
and conclusions have been strongly challenged.
He claims that interest and research in DID
have waned, yet he fails to cite the multitude
of studies that have been conducted about it.
In fact, Dalenberg et al. (2007) documented evidence of the exact opposite pattern described
by Paris: ‘‘A search of the PILOTS database
offered by the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder for articles on dissociation reveals 64 studies in 1985Y1989, 236
published in 1990Y1994, 426 published in
1995Y1999 and 477 in the last 5-year block
(2000Y2004)’’ (p. 401).
Dr Paris seems unaware of the depth
and the breadth of research about dissociation
yet made sweeping generalizations about it.
For example, he fails to review the neurobiological and clinical research that has led to the
addition of a dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the DSM-5. He
fails to cite cutting-edge research on dissociation including a recent study by 2012) in Biological Psychiatry that found evidence of the
dissociative subtype of PTSD in about 14.4%
of 25,018 individuals in a World Health Organization sample involving 16 countries.
The dissociative subtype was associated with
male sex, a history of high exposure to previous traumatic events and childhood adversities, subsequent onset of PTSD in childhood,
histories of separation anxiety disorder and
specific phobia, severe role impairment,
and suicidality. Dr Paris fails to cite a review
article in 2010 in the American Journal of
Psychiatry identifying a neurobiological and
psychophysiological profile of the dissociative subtype of PTSD (Lanius et al., 2010).
These individuals respond to traumatic scripts
with hyperfrontality and limbic inhibition on
functional magnetic resonance imaging, in
contrast to those with the hyperarousal type,
who have hypofrontality and limbic activation.
* 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
In addition, he fails to cite a variety of neurobiological and psychophysiological studies of
DID documenting similar brain morphology abnormalities in patients with DID to
those of other traumatized patients (Reinders
et al., 2006; Vermetten et al., 2006). Despite failing to review this and other relevant research, Dr Paris made the claim that
‘‘Neither the theory behind the diagnosis
nor the methods of treatment are consistent
with the current preference for biological
theories’’ (p. 1078). Furthermore, he fails to
cite any research that has been done by researchers outside North America. For example, Vedat Sar, MD, in Turkey has published
more than 70 articles and chapters on dissociative disorders and trauma (http://vedatsar.com/
index_2.htm), but Dr Paris failed to mention a
single one.
Dr Paris seems unaware of the research
on child abuse and its consistent link with
adult psychopathology. He stated incorrectly
that ‘‘Child abuse is only a weak risk factor
for the development of adult psychopathology’’ (p. 1078). To make this claim, he had to
overlook a broad range of research including
large-population and prospective, controlled
studies, such as the National Comorbidity Study
Replication (Scott et al., 2010), documenting
that early life trauma and maltreatment show a
dose-response relationship with higher rates of
depression, substance abuse, suicidality, selfdestructiveness, problems with relationships,
work impairment, revictimization, and dissociation and number of DSM-IV-TR diagnoses,
among many others, including the leading causes of death from serious medical disease (Cicchetti, 2004; Felitti and Anda, 2010; Trickett et
al., 2011). Dr Paris’s puzzling and incorrect
claim has been carefully examined and refuted
in the scientific literature (Dallam et al., 2001).
At the least, contrary published information
should be discussed.
A recent review in Psychological Bulletin
by 2012) found strong support for the etiological
relationship of trauma and dissociation. These
included several large meta-analyses, some
of which focused on patients with DID.
Dalenberg et al. (2012) found an effect size
of r = 0.52 and 0.54 for the relationship between childhood physical abuse and sexual
abuse, respectively, in studies that compared
individuals with dissociative disorders with
those without dissociative disorders. In addition, Dalenberg et al. (2012) tested eight different predictions of the trauma versus the
fantasy (sociocognitive/iatrogenic) model of
dissociation. On each, careful of reviews of the
literature, including meta-analyses, on memory,
suggestibility, and neurobiology, among others,
Dalenberg et al. (2012) found minimal scientific
evidence to support the fantasy model. Further,
reviews have shown that there are no research
studies in the literature in any population studied
to support the iatrogenic/sociocognitive etiology
* 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
of DID promulgated by Dr Paris (Brown et al.,
1999; Loewenstein, 2007).
Dr Paris makes claims that are far afield
from what can be scientifically substantiated by
current research. For example, he states that ‘‘I
the treatment recommended [for DID] was
never shown to be successful’’ (p. 1078). Dr
Paris ignores studies that have found that treatment of DID is associated with improvements
in a range of outcomes, including substantially
reduced dissociation, PTSD, depression, general
distress, suicidality, and self-destructive behaviors, among others. For example, he failed to cite
a prospective study of almost 300 therapists and
patients from around the world (Brand et al.,
2009b, 2012). The 30-month follow-up data
showed that patients showed decreased dissociation, PTSD, general distress, depression, suicide attempts, self-harm, dangerous behaviors,
drug use, physical pain, and hospitalizations
as well as improved functioning and higher
Global Assessment of Functioning scores. Furthermore, more patients progressed from early
stages of treatment to more advanced stages
than regressed from an advanced to early treatment stage.
Despite citing a recent review of DID
treatment, Dr Paris did not make clear that
every study described in the review by Brand
et al. (2009a) showed that patients with DID
benefit from phase-oriented treatment specific to DID. Further, meta-analyses found
medium to large effect sizes across a range of
outcomes including decreased symptoms of
dissociation, PTSD, depression, and anxiety
as well as reduced self-harm and suicidality
(Brand et al., 2009a). Indeed, data show that
failure to treat DID results in significant iatrogenic worsening of these patients (Kluft, 1989).
Dr Paris notes that ‘‘random controlled trials’’
have not been performed on patients with DID.
However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
for complex disorders such as BPD and DID
may be not be feasible, especially across all
phases of a long-term treatment (Brand et al.,
2009a; Westen et al., 2004). In addition, the
need to individualize treatment of complex disorders with many comorbidities and high risk
for suicide attempts and/or self-destructive behavior may lead to adverse outcomes without
modifying the usual RCT structures or using
alternative designs (Brand et al., 2009a).
In addition, by trivializing a psychiatric disorder that research shows affects 1% to
3% of the general population and that is common in both inpatient and outpatient settings
(Akyuz et al., 1999; Foote et al., 2006; Johnson
et al., 2006; Ross, 1991), articles such as that of
Dr Paris add to the burden of stigma for these
highly traumatized patients with serious psychiatric illness. Indeed, studies have shown that
patients with DID have high rates of impairment,
significant rates of treatment in more restrictive
levels of care, and high rates of suicidality, leading to a significant burden of disease and cost
Letters to the Editor
to the mental health system (Johnson et al.,
2006; Loewenstein, 1994; Mansfield et al.,
2010; Mueller-Pfeiffer et al., 2012).
The trauma-focused, phasic treatment
model cited above is associated with significant clinical improvement. In addition, studies
have also shown significant cost savings to
the mental health system if correct treatment
is provided for these patients (Loewenstein,
1994; Ross and Dua, 1993).
Dr Paris gives one of us (D. S.) undeserved credit for dissociative disorders being
in the DSM-5. They are there because the literature and clinical experience support it and
our colleagues in American psychiatry (as
well as the World Health Organization in the
International Classification of Diseases) know
that these are prevalent and persistent psychiatric disorders. Inclusion in the DSM-5 required
extensive review and approval by the following:
a) The Work Group on Anxiety, ObsessiveCompulsive, Trauma-Related and Dissociative Disorders (including many researchers
from outside the dissociative disorders field),
b) The Scientific Review Committee, c) The
Clinical and Public Health Committee, d) the
DSM-5 Task Force as a whole, and e) the Board
of Trustees of the American Psychiatric Association. Dr Paris could have given input at
any point in this process, including commentary on the www.DSM5.org Web site, which,
for months, listed the proposed diagnostic
criteria for dissociative disorders in DSM-5,
and invited commentary. Indeed, all of the
online comments were brought to the attention of the Work Group members during the
DSM-5 process.
In his critique, Dr Paris cites the review
by Spiegel et al. (2011) of dissociative disorders for DSM-5, at the same time claiming
that modern theories of dissociation are based
solely on antecedent trauma, not genetic or biological factors. However, he ignores the full
discussion in that article of the genetic data on
dissociation (including his own articleVJang et
al., 1998), citing, specifically, the interaction of
genetic and environmental factors (e.g., traumatic experiences) that may lead to expression
of a clinical dissociative disorder. In addition,
that article reviews in depth the neurobiological data on dissociative disorders. Despite this,
he claims that the dissociative disorders field
has neglected neurobiological or genetic factors in understanding the process of dissociation and the dissociative disorders.
Dr Paris also misrepresents David
Spiegel’s late father Dr Herbert Spiegel’s
opinion of Sybil. Dr Spiegel thought that
Dr Cornelia Wilbur was pushing Sybil toward more fragmentation, so he disagreed with
her treatment technique and concluded that
Sybil had dissociative disorder not otherwise specified rather than dissociative identity
disorder. One of us (D. S.) wrote the introduction to the book about the Sybil case cited
www.jonmd.com
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
355
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Letters to the Editor
REFERENCES
Brand BL, Classen C, McNary SW, Zaveri P (2009a) A
review of treatment outcome studies for dissociative
disorders. J Nerv Ment Dis. 197:646Y654.
Brand BL, Classen CC, Lanius RA, Loewenstein RJ,
McNary SW, Pain C, Putnam FW (2009b) A naturalistic
study of dissociative identity disorder and dissociative
disorder not otherwise specified patients treated by
community clinicians. Psychol Trauma. 1:153Y171.
Brand BL, McNary SW, Myrick AC, Loewenstein RJ,
Classen CC, Lanius RA, Pain C, Putnam FW (2012)
A longitudinal, naturalistic study of dissociative
disorder patients treated by community clinicians.
Psychol Trauma. doi: 10.1037/a0027654.
Brown D, Scheflin AW, Hammond DC (1998) Memory,
trauma, treatment, and the law. New York: Norton.
Brown DW, Frischholz EJ, Scheflin AW (1999) Iatrogenic dissociative identity disorder: An evaluation of
the scientific evidence. J Psychiatry Law. 27:549Y638.
Cicchetti D (2004) An odyssey of discovery: Lessons
learned through three decades of research on child
maltreatment. Am Psychol. 59:731Y741.
Dalenberg C, Loewenstein R, Spiegel D, Brewin C,
Lanius R, Frankel S, Gold S, Van der Kolk B, Simeon
D, Vermetten E, Butler L, Koopman C, Courtois C,
Dell P, Nijenhuis E, Chu J, Sar V, Palesh O, Cuevas C,
Paulson K (2007) Scientific study of the dissociative
disorders. Psychother Psychosom. 76:400Y401.
Dalenberg CJ, Brand BL, Gleaves DH, Dorahy MJ,
Loewenstein RJ, Cardena E, Frewen PA, Carlson
EB, Spiegel D (2012) Evaluation of the evidence
for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation.
Psychol Bull. 138:550Y588.
Dallam SJ, Gleaves DH, Cepeda-Benito A, Silberg JL,
Kraemer HC, Spiegel D (2001) The effects of child
sexual abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch, and
Bauserman (1998). Psychol Bull. 127:715Y733.
Felitti V, Anda R (2010) The relationship of adverse
childhood experiences to adult medical disease,
psychiatric disorders and sexual behavior. In Vermetten E, Lanius RA, Pain C (Eds), The hidden
epidemic: The impact of early life trauma on health
and disease (pp 77Y87). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Foote B, Smolin Y, Kaplan M, Legatt ME, Lipschitz D
(2006) Prevalence of dissociative disorders in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 163:623Y629.
International Society for the Study of Dissociation,
Chu JA, Dell PF, Somer E, Van der Hart O, Cardeña
E, Barach PM, Loewenstein RJ, Brand B, Golston
JC, Courtois CA, Bowman ES, Classen C, Dorahy
M, Sar V, Gelinas DJ, Fine CG, Paulson S, Kluft
RP, Dalenberg CJ, Jacobson-Levy M, Nijenhuis
ERS, Boon S, Chefetz R, Middleton W, Ross CA,
Howell E, Goodwin G, Coons PM, Frankel AS,
Steele K, Gold SN, Gast U, Young LM, Twombly
J (2011) Guidelines for treating dissociative identity disorder in adults, third revision. J Trauma
Dissociation. 12:115Y187.
Jang KL, Paris J, Zweig-Frank H, Livesley WJ (1998)
Twin study of dissociative experience. J Nerv Ment
Dis. 186:345Y351.
Johnson JG, Cohena P, Kasena K, Brook JS (2006)
Dissociative disorders among adults in the community, impaired functioning, and axis I and II comorbidity. J Psychiatr Res. 40:131Y140.
Kluft RP (1989) Iatrogenic creation of new alter personalities. Dissociation. 2:83Y91.
Lanius RA, Vermetten E, Loewenstein RJ, Brand BL,
Schmahl C, Bremner JD, Spiegel D (2010) Emotion
modulation in PTSD: Clinical and neurobiological
evidence for a dissociative subtype. Am J Psychiatry.
167:640Y647.
Akyuz G, Dogan O, Sar V, Yargic LI, Tutkun H (1999)
Frequency of dissociative identity disorder in the general
population in Turkey. Compr Psychiatry. 40:151Y159.
Loewenstein RJ (1994) Diagnosis, epidemiology, clinical course, treatment, and cost effectiveness of treatment for dissociative disorders and multiple personality
by Dr Paris (Rieber, 2006), explicitly disputing its conclusions.
We disagree with almost every paragraph in Dr Paris’s article, from his inadequate
discussion of the history of Janet, Freud, and
the issue of traumatic memory in psychoanalysis to his one-sided discussion of the modern
‘‘false memory’’ legal cases and the complex
medicolegal, forensic, and historical factors
that led to them and to their cessation (Brown
et al., 1998; Simeon and Loewenstein, 2009).
We dispute his discussion of the role of hypnosis in DID treatment; indeed, expert consensus in the DID field is that hypnosis is primarily
used for attenuation of severe symptoms, including severe PTSD flashbacks and intrusive
symptoms, not for memory recovery (International Society for the Study of Dissociation
et al., 2011).
The strength of Dr Paris’s conclusions is
not matched by a comparably strong empirical
foundation and even includes ad hominem attack. Disagreement about important issues in
our field is important and vital. However, this
level of scholarship would not be considered
acceptable in the discussion of the psychotic
disorders, mood disorders, personality disorders, or any other disorder in psychiatry. It
is time that the same minimum standard of
scholarship be provided for discussion of the
dissociative disorders.
In summary, disagreement is healthy for
our field. However, Dr Paris’s article does not
provide scholarly criticism based upon peerreviewed research, scientific data, or accurate
discussion of the history of psychiatry. His
point of view is incorrect and outmoded. It is
the so-called false-memory, iatrogenesis model
of the dissociative disorders that is the fallen
fad, buried under the weight of rigorous data
that contradict it. Dissociative disorders have
not risen and fallen. These existed before the
fields of psychiatry and psychology did. These
are, alas, here to stay but are amenable to better
understanding and improved treatments.
Bethany Brand, PhD
Department of Psychology
Towson University, MD
Richard J. Loewenstein, MD
The Trauma Disorders Program
Sheppard Pratt Health System
Baltimore, MD
Department of Psychiatry
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Baltimore
David Spiegel, MD
Department of Psychiatry
and Behavioral Sciences
Stanford University School of Medicine
CA
356
www.jonmd.com
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
disorder: Report submitted to the Clinton administration task force on health care financing reform. Dissociation. 7:3Y11.
Loewestein RJ (2007) Dissociative identity disorder:
Issues in the iatrogenesis controversy. In Vermetten E,
Dorahy M, Spiegel D (Eds), Traumatic dissociation
(pp 275Y299). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Mansfield AJ, Kaufman JS, Marshall SW, Gaynes BN,
Morrissey JP, Engel CC (2010) Deployment and the
use of mental health services among U.S. Army wives.
N Engl J Med. 362:101Y109.
Mueller-Pfeiffer C, Rufibach K, Perron N, Wyss D,
Kuenzler C, Prezewowsky C, Pitman RK, Rufer M
(2012) Global functioning and disability in dissociative disorders. Psychiatry Res. 200:475Y481.
Paris J (2012) The rise and fall of dissociative identity
disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 200:1076Y1079.
Reinders AA, Nijenhuis ER, Quak J, Korf J, Haaksma J,
Paans AM, Willemsen AT, den Boer JA (2006)
Psychobiological characteristics of dissociative identity disorder: A symptom provocation study. Biol
Psychiatry. 60:730Y740.
Rieber R (2006) The bifurcation of the self. New
York: Springer.
Ross CA (1991) Epidemiology of multiple personality
disorder and dissociation. Psychiatr Clin North Am.
14:503Y517.
Ross CA, Dua V (1993) Psychiatric health care costs of
multiple personality disorder. Am J Psychother. 47:
103Y112.
Scott J, Varghese D, McGrath J (2010) As the twig
is bent, the tree inclines: Adult mental health consequences of childhood adversity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 67:111Y112.
Simeon D, Loewenstein RJ (2009) Dissociative disorders. In Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P (Eds),
Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (9th ed, Vol 1,
pp 1965Y2026). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Spiegel D, Loewenstein RJ, Lewis-Fernandez R, Sar V,
Simeon D, Vermetten E, Cardena E, Dell PF (2011)
Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depress Anxiety.
28:824Y852.
Trickett PK, Noll JG, Putnam FW (2011) The impact of
sexual abuse on female development: Lessons from a
multigenerational, longitudinal research study. Dev
Psychopathol. 23:453Y476.
Vermetten E, Schmahl CG, Lindner S, Loewenstein RJ,
Bremner JD (2006) Hippocampal and amygdalar volumes in dissociative identity disorder. Am J Psychiatry.
163:630Y636.
Westen D, Novotny CM, Thompson-Brenner H
(2004) The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings,
and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychol
Bull. 130:631Y663.
Response to Dissociative
Identity Disorder Letters
From Martı́nez-Taboas et al.
and Brand et al.
To the Editor:
t must be difficult to acknowledge that one
has spent a great part of one’s career promoting an illusion, particularly one that has
been destructive to patients’ lives. However,
that is the position that the proponents of
I
* 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
dissociative disorders find themselves in. The
good news is that most psychiatrists ignored
dissociative identity disorder, even at the
height of the fad. The defeat of this idea helps
to explain their furious onslaught on an article that only describes the current scientific
consensus. The highly selective nature of
their review of other published articles will be
apparent to anyone who knows this literature.
Unfortunately, neither Brand et al.
nor Martinez-Taboas et al. have sufficient scientific training to be skeptical about one of the
most absurd fads in the history of medicine.
They are true believers, and that is what makes
them dangerous. They fall back on personal attack, including the claim that I do not understand the impact of childhood abuse (despite my
20 years of research on the subject). Evidently,
it has not occurred to them that the impact of
adversity needs to be studied prospectively (or
with independent validation), not by misguided
therapists who insist that patients must have
experienced abuse, whether they remember it
or not.
The larger tragedy is that once a category gets into DSM, it is almost impossible to
remove it. When manufacturers produce defective products, they apologize for errors
and carry out recalls. However, when psychiatrists invent diseases, and when they have
friends in high places, they suffer no consequences other than long-term reputation.
Our profession lacks oversight and regulation. The responsibility for this fiasco, which
has done much to make our specialty look
ridiculous, lies with the American Psychiatric
Association and the editors of the various
DSM editions, who allowed it to happen.
Joel Paris, MD
Department of Psychiatry
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Do Fads Ever Die?
To the Editor:
r Joel Paris’s article, The Rise and Fall
of Dissociative Identity Disorder, in the
December issue of the JNMD is timely. The
multiple personality disorder/dissociative identity disorder (MPD/DID) craze within psychiatry and clinical psychology that crested in the
1990s, and that was discredited in courts of
law, has shown regenerative signs that need a
prompt rebuke.
CrazesVparticularly medical crazesV
follow the course Penrose (1952) described in
his book On the Objective Study of Crowd
Behavior. A few enthusiasts start a craze
as did the followers of Cornelia Wilbur and
Sybil with this one. A craze catches on by
D
* 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
attracting susceptible followers, usually by
means of ‘‘scientific’’ claims about illuminating
ideas and new mechanisms that ultimately
lead to clinical and public confusion and an
immunity to its allure in most other physicians. The craze then retreats, only to return
when the veteran enthusiasts presume that
‘‘the dust has settled’’ and, perhaps, the old
ideas and methods can work their magic
again.
Dr Paris correctly notes that as long as
official psychiatry credits categories such as
MPD/DID, where a theoretical conception is
embedded in the criteria, then ‘‘the way of
return’’ for ‘‘repressed and recovered memory
therapy’’ stays open. Simply look at the ‘‘criteria’’ for dissociative amnesia in DSM-IV, in
which the psychological symptoms that have
the same behavioral, artifactual nature as the
physical symptoms of conversion disorder are
given a diametrically opposite interpretationV
that is, assumed to be genuine rather than
pseudoimpairments of faculties. This mistaken
view about the nature of the condition is at the
root of these enterprises.
Critics of Dr Paris’s article ignore his
basic arguments and expend effort identifying
‘‘scientific, peer-reviewed literature’’ about childhood traumas and adverse experiences that
they claim he overlooks. However, the issue is
not ‘‘science’’; it is ‘‘practice.’’ The practices
derived from the MPD/DID scientific presumptions have produced countless casualties
among patients treated and families affected. A
chaos of claims, counterclaims, court judgments, financial settlements, and general discredit of psychiatric coherence depicts the
history of the early and mid-1990s, when this
craze hit its peak. Recovered memory therapy
became a byword for psychiatric mistreatment
in many circlesVboth professional and lay.
No one can deny the casualties and the
chaos, although some champions of MPD/
DID have tried. Let me list a few that, being
on the public record, can be consulted by any
party reflecting on and wondering about the
relevance of Dr Paris’s article.
The craze-initiating text Sybil, describing a patient with MPD (who was suspected,
by an experienced psychiatrist, to be a ‘‘game
playing hysterical patient with role confusion’’;
Borch-Jacobsen, 1997), was based, Nathan
(2011) reveals, upon a fraudulent misdirection of practice and opinion. However, Sybil
is hardly the worst example or the person who
suffered the most from this kind of treatment.
The Donna Smith case, fought out in
the courts of Maryland, displayed the efforts of
psychiatrists to send an innocent man to prison
on the basis of the false recovered memories
of his vulnerable daughter evoked into MPD
with hypnosis and Amobarbital-advanced suggestions. For these wrongful practicesV
when the daughter retracted her memories and
was discovered to have Graves’s diseaseVthe
Letters to the Editor
psychiatrist and his hospital paid a large financial settlement for damages to the family.
The popular press revealed many of the grim
details (Taylor, 1994).
In the Patty Burgus case at Chicago’s
Rush Medical Center, one of the psychiatric
founders of the International Society for the
Study of Multiple Personality and Dissociation and a leader of the MPD/DID therapies
carried out a wild, mistaken, misdirected
treatment program with Ms Burgus based on
the view that she and her children were being
abused and controlled by disciples of a ‘‘satanic cult’’ arising from Transylvania in the
Middle Ages. When this patient ultimately
regained her coherence by withdrawing from
the intense inpatient therapeutic regimen that
included hypnotic treatments, group pressures, and intoxicating medications, she
sought and received a malpractice settlement
of 10 million dollars. The psychiatrist lost his
medical license in Illinois.
In addition, there is the Jack Quattrocchi
case in Rhode Island, in which, again, academically distinguished advocates of MPD/DID
and repressed memories testified and advocated sending this man to prison for more than
20 years all on the basis of the responses to
psychotherapeutic pressure again by a psychologically vulnerable young woman who
protested against the claim that she had been
sexually abused by Quattrocchi until she was
subdued by the prejudices and claims of this
‘‘science of the mind’’ advanced by her therapist on the basis of the writings and the views
of these very advocates.
These three cases are but a sample
from a long list of other patient and family
casualties that includes examples of suicide,
bankruptcy, false imprisonmentVbut it is a
sample with a public record that anyone can
consult and study right down to the records
from hospital clinics and the statements of
protagonists and defendants in the cases.
These psychiatrists were not ‘‘undertrained’’
therapists but the very leaders of this movement. In no case did anybody hold himself/
herself to account for being so grievously and
shamefully wrong.
The peer-reviewed literature does not
speak to the practice. It is clear that there is a
need for ‘‘peer-reviewed practice,’’ especially
those practices of the leading proponents of
MPD/DID. Interested parties should examine
just how the psychiatrists and the psychologists who promoted MPD/DID have behaved
in the past when faced with these casualties.
They dismissed them out of hand.
They condemned every honest effort, including those made by me, to bring to their attention the suffering victims. They presumed such
efforts to be in bad faith and ones defending
incestuous pedophiles. In addition, they never
identified in their later publications or teaching
what pitfalls into which they themselves had
www.jonmd.com
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
357
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Letters to the Editor
fallen (and had to pay damage settlements) or
just what dangers the loose assumptions about
repressed memories bring when promoted for
general psychotherapeutic practice.
Dr Paris’s article is important and
thoughtful. Do not dismiss it with trivial criticisms. Certainly, if you are thinking of importing MPD/DID therapy into your country from
the United States, beware of just what you will
likely deliver to your fellow citizensVa chaos of
358
www.jonmd.com
fraught claims, family injuries hard to repair,
and mistrust in the professional integrity of
psychiatrists.
Paul McHugh, MD
Department of Psychiatry
and Behavioral Sciences
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD
& Volume 201, Number 4, April 2013
REFERENCES
Borch-Jacobsen M (1997) SybilVThe making and
marketing of a disease: An interview with Herbert
Spiegel. In Dufresne T (Ed), Freud under analysis
(p 190). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Nathan D (2011) Sybil exposed. New York: Simon &
Schuster.
Penrose LS (1952) On the objective study of crowd
behavior. London: HK Lewis.
Taylor J (1994) Lost daughter. Esquire Magazine.
121:76.
* 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Copyright © 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.