CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
PROOF COVER SHEET
Author(s):
Benjamin Zachariah
Article title:
Article no:
Enclosures:
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism: Framing the Volk in India
1078948
1) Query sheet
2) Article proofs
Dear Author,
1. Please check these proofs carefully. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to check
these and approve or amend them. A second proof is not normally provided. Taylor & Francis
cannot be held responsible for uncorrected errors, even if introduced during the production process.
Once your corrections have been added to the article, it will be considered ready for publication.
Please limit changes at this stage to the correction of errors. You should not make trivial changes,
improve prose style, add new material, or delete existing material at this stage. You may be charged
if your corrections are excessive (we would not expect corrections to exceed 30 changes).
For detailed guidance on how to check your proofs, please paste this address into a new browser
window: http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/checkingproofs.asp
Your PDF proof file has been enabled so that you can comment on the proof directly using Adobe
Acrobat. If you wish to do this, please save the file to your hard disk first. For further information on
marking corrections using Acrobat, please paste this address into a new browser window: http://
journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/production/acrobat.asp
2. Please review the table of contributors below and confirm that the first and last names are
structured correctly and that the authors are listed in the correct order of contribution. This
check is to ensure that your name will appear correctly online and when the article is indexed.
Sequence
1
Prefix
Given name(s)
Benjamin
Surname
Zachariah
Suffix
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
Queries are marked in the margins of the proofs, and you can also click the hyperlinks below.
Content changes made during copy-editing are shown as tracked changes. Inserted text is in red font and
revisions have a blue indicator . Changes can also be viewed using the list comments function. To
Finsert or delete text following the instructions below, but do not add
correct the proofs, you should n
comments to the existing tracked changes.
AUTHOR QUERIES
General points:
1. Permissions: You have warranted that you have secured the necessary written permission
from the appropriate copyright owner for the reproduction of any text, illustration, or other
material in your article. Please see http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/permissions/
usingThirdPartyMaterial.asp.
2. Third-party content: If there is third-party content in your article, please check that the
rightsholder details for re-use are shown correctly.
3. Affiliation: The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that address and email
details are correct for all the co-authors. Affiliations given in the article should be the
affiliation at the time the research was conducted. Please see http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/
preparation/writing.asp.
4. Funding: Was your research for this article funded by a funding agency? If so, please insert
‘This work was supported by <insert the name of the funding agency in full>’, followed by
the grant number in square brackets ‘[grant number xxxx]’.
5. Supplemental data and underlying research materials: Do you wish to include the location of the
underlying research materials (e.g. data, samples or models) for your article? If so, please insert this
sentence before the reference section: ‘The underlying research materials for this article can be
accessed at <full link>/ description of location [author to complete]’. If your article includes
supplemental data, the link will also be provided in this paragraph. See <http://journalauthors.tandf.
co.uk/preparation/multimedia.asp> for further explanation of supplemental data and underlying
research materials.
6. The CrossRef database (www.crossref.org/) has been used to validate the references.
Resulting changes are tracked in red font.
Q1.
Q2.
Q3.
Q4.
Q5.
Q6.
Q7.
Q8.
Q9.
Q10.
Note 5: Pls provide the name/s of the editor/s or writer of this book.
Note 10 [Zachariah]: Pls provide the issue number, if available.
Note 48 [Rosselli]: Pls provide the relevant volume number, if available.
Note 53: Pls provide the relevant issue number, if available.
Note 64: Pls provide the relevant volume number, issue number and page numbers,
if available.
Note 67: Pls provide the name of the publishing house.
Note 72: Pls provide the name of the publishing house.
Note 74 [Sarkar]: Pls provide the name of the publishing house.
Note 74 [Hoffmann]: Pls provide the name of the publishing house.
Note 74 [Glasenapp]: Pls provide the name of the publishing house.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
How to make corrections to your proofs using Adobe Acrobat/Reader
Taylor & Francis offers you a choice of options to help you make corrections to your proofs.
Your PDF proof file has been enabled so that you can edit the proof directly using Adobe
Acrobat/Reader. This is the simplest and best way for you to ensure that your corrections will
be incorporated. If you wish to do this, please follow these instructions:
1. Save the file to your hard disk.
2. Check which version of Adobe Acrobat/Reader you have on your computer. You can do this
by clicking on the “Help” tab, and then “About”.
If Adobe Reader is not installed, you can get the latest version free from http://get.adobe.com/
reader/.
3. If you have Adobe Acrobat/Reader 10 or a later version, click on the “Comment” link at the
right-hand side to view the Comments pane.
4. You can then select any text and mark it up for deletion or replacement, or insert new text as
needed. Please note that these will clearly be displayed in the Comments pane and secondary
annotation is not needed to draw attention to your corrections. If you need to include new
sections of text, it is also possible to add a comment to the proofs. To do this, use the Sticky
Note tool in the task bar. Please also see our FAQs here: http://journalauthors.tandf.co.uk/
production/index.asp.
5. Make sure that you save the file when you close the document before uploading it to CATS
using the “Upload File” button on the online correction form. If you have more than one file,
please zip them together and then upload the zip file.
If you prefer, you can make your corrections using the CATS online correction form.
Troubleshooting
Acrobat help: http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat.html
Reader help: http://helpx.adobe.com/reader.html
Please note that full user guides for earlier versions of these programs are available from the
Adobe Help pages by clicking on the link “Previous versions” under the “Help and tutorials”
heading from the relevant link above. Commenting functionality is available from Adobe
Reader 8.0 onwards and from Adobe Acrobat 7.0 onwards.
Firefox users: Firefox’s inbuilt PDF Viewer is set to the default; please see the following for
instructions on how to use this and download the PDF to your hard drive:
http://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/view-pdf-files-firefox-without-downloadingthem#w_using-a-pdf-reader-plugin
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 2015
Vol. 0, No. 0, 1 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2015.1078948
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism: Framing the Volk in India
BENJAMIN ZACHARIAH, Karl Jaspers Centre for Advanced Transcultural Studies,
Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
5
10
The genealogies of v€
olkisch ideas everywhere would suggest that they were relatively
widespread in a world thinking about defining the nature of nationalism. The idea of the Volk
has its origins, of course, in German romanticist imaginings of the German nation. The
glorification of an ‘Aryan’ past in India, the identification of the ‘folk element’, or a
connection with sacred soil and sacred space, shared the same building blocks of romantic
nationalism that were evident across the world. This essay focuses on Indian v€
olkisch
nationalism through the work and career of Benoy Kumar Sarkar, his engagements with
German and Indian ideas, his ability to translate them across their specific contexts and his
institutional linkages.
Keywords: Volk; fascism; Nazism; Benoy Kumar Sarkar; Greater India Society; Ramakrishna
Mission; theosophy; Deutsche Akademie; Aryan; Hindu
15
20
25
30
Introduction
Given the prevalence of Right-wing movements that look very like fascist movements in India
(which includes the parts of the former British India and the former Princely States that are no
longer parts of India) from the early twentieth century to the present day, it seems important,
even obvious, to bring India into the analysis of v€
olkisch and fascist ideas and movements.
Yet, if fascism as an academic field of study can (or thinks it can) do without India, it is more
than apparent that by now, both politically and academically, India cannot do without fascism.
And if fascism cannot do without the v€
olkisch, this is true in both India and elsewhere in the
world. What is required, in the absence of a proper debate on fascism, the Volk and the
question of the authentic national voice in the historiography of South Asia, is to listen in on a
mostly Eurocentric debate and to restore South Asia’s rightful place in the history of Rightwing movements. Given too that the age of the rise of fascism was also an age of
internationalism, which was the context for a movement or set of movements that disavowed
its or their own internationalist parochialism(s), it is only logical to reiterate here that there
was not a separate ‘European’ and ‘South Asian’ political sphere of debates: they were
inexorably connected.1
The point of this essay is not to set up a teleology of fascism in general or for South Asia.
Indeed, the genealogies of v€
olkisch ideas everywhere would suggest that some v€
olkisch ideas
Thanks are due to two anonymous referees who engaged closely with this piece, and to several persons who have
discussed fascism and fascists with me over the years, some of whom would not like to be implicated in my
conclusions, but you know who you are, and I have thanked you before.
1
See Ali Raza, Franziska Roy and Benjamin Zachariah, ‘Introduction: The Internationalism of the Moment—
South Asia and the Contours of the Interwar World’, in Ali Raza, Franziska Roy and Benjamin Zachariah (eds),
The Internationalist Moment: South Asia, Worlds and World Views, 1917 1939 (New Delhi: Sage, 2015),
pp. xi xli.
Ó 2015 South Asian Studies Association of Australia
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
2
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
led nowhere, or at least not to fascism, but they were relatively widespread in a world thinking
about defining the nature of nationalism (and we now agree at least that fascism is a form of
nationalism).2 The idea of the Volk has its origins, of course, in romanticist imaginings of the
German nation in an era of European nationalisms. It was anti-rationalist, ethnic, racialised,
anti-Semitic and organicist and it glorified all things it could claim as ‘Germanic’; the extent
of its commitment to paganism, or to religion at all, remains open to debate and depends on
variations and emphases among its followers.3 This glorification of an ‘Aryan’ past in India,
or a connection with sacred soil and sacred space, hardly needed a (later) Nazi affiliation, but
it had been a part of the same building blocks of romantic nationalism across the world. A
Savarkarian Hindutva or a Sarkarian Volk would unproblematically have shared certain
distinctions with one another, as with the protagonists of a Germanic Volk.4 As for the
authentic Hindu or Aryan, past, present and future, groups like the Arya Samaj, social
reformers and anti-Muslim campaigners, the Ramakrishna Mission, or the Theosophists and
their splinter groups, competed with one another for the right to define this, but did not
substantially disagree that there was one.5
The advantage and problem of tracing a movement in retrospect, with the benefit of
hindsight, is that we can see developments that actors of the time could not see. This warning
notwithstanding, we need to read the histories of these times backwards as well as forwards,
both as genealogy (with branches of a family tree dying out—analogies prove nothing, as
Sigmund Freud once wrote, but they make us feel more at home)6 and as teleology, even if a
cautious teleology. As the European debates indicate, the ideas that made for fascism were
already around at the end of the nineteenth century; they came together in the conjunctural
situation provided by the end of World War I, but this coming together was not predictable or
ee perspectives
inevitable.7 In addition, there needs to be a place for conjunctural or longue dur
that are not entirely actor-centric even in work that takes actor-centric categories seriously—
for, otherwise, we confuse terms for movements and movements for terms, and the term
‘fascist’ as a descriptive as well as normative category loses its specificity or its usefulness.
There are difficulties in these attempts to bridge debates. The connections between fascist
ideas and particular Indian nationalist thinkers is an important theme that appears to fall
35
40
45
50
55
60
2
Q1
Stefan Arvidsson, Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science (Chicago, IL: Chicago
University Press, 2006).
3
Uwe Puschner, Die V€
olkische Bewegung im wilhelminischen Deutschland. Sprache—Rasse—Religion
(Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2001); and Stefan Breuer, Die V€
olkischen in Deutschland.
Kaiserreich und Weimarer Republik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2008).
4
See Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu? (Nagpur: Bharat Publications, 1928), by way of
comparison. For an analysis of the genesis of concepts of Hindutva, see Jyotirmaya Sharma, Hindutva:
Exploring the Idea of Hindu Nationalism (New Delhi: Viking, 2003), in which he treats the ideas of Swami
Dayanand Saraswati of the Arya Samaj, Aurobindo Ghosh, the revolutionary-turned-mystic, Swami
Vivekananda, the godman and founder of the Hindu missionary order, the Ramakrishna Mission, and Vinayak
Damodar Savarkar of the Hindu Mahasabha. Sharma does not relate his argument to the idea of the Volk, but he
might easily have done so.
5
The intermingling of ideas of race, nation and Aryan Hindu in India has been noted before. For a summary of
the debate, see Benjamin Zachariah, ‘The Invention of Hinduism for National Use’, Playing the Nation Game
(Delhi: Yoda Press, 2011), pp. 153 204.
6
Sigmund Freud, Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (London: Hogarth Press, [1917] 1963). This was a
throwaway remark that I cannot trace the page numbers of manually, as I still have a paper copy.
7
Zeev Sternhell, ‘How to Think about Fascism and Its Ideology’, in Constellations, Vol. 15, no. 3 (2008),
pp. 280 90; David D. Roberts, ‘How Not to Think about Fascism and Ideology, Intellectual Antecedents and
Historical Meaning’, in Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 35, no. 2 (2000), pp. 185 211; and Kevin
Passmore, ‘The Ideological Origins of Fascism before 1914’, in R.J.B. Bosworth (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of
Fascism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 11 31.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
3
between two more established academic disciplines: of the European study of fascism done
predominantly by those who see themselves as ‘Western’ scholars (with some work now being
done on eastern Europe) and of the study of major strands of (in particular) Indian
nationalism. This scholarship on fascism tends to ignore the extra-European writing for
reasons of embarrassment, disciplinary specialisation or (in)competence or because it is seen
as a secondary part of the history of fascist ideas. Many scholars of South Asian history, or of
intellectual history more generally, might also say that this is a question of European
‘influence’ on Indian thinking in a flat impact response sense.8 A good starting point,
therefore, is from a central question of nationalism anywhere, and also therefore of South
Asian nationalisms—the question of finding the ‘authentic’ voice of the ‘nation’, a voice
which had to be ‘indigenous’, not ‘foreign’.
This essay, therefore, studies the borderlands of an Indian engagement with fascism: the
idea of the authenticity of the ‘folk’, connecting to organicist ideas of community and nation
in the twentieth century whose protagonists recognised affinities with fascism and, later,
Nazism. The essay hinges on the use of ideas of the ‘indigenous’ or the ‘authentic’. It
problematises the assumed linearity of ideas about a Hindu/Indian race or nation and also
questions the directionality of narratives of the travel and absorption of fascist ideas: not from
Europe to elsewhere, but multilinear and multilaterally invented.
To study this, it is important to place India in the wider context of the world at the time of
which we are speaking. The emergence of a fascist imaginary and a fascist set of political
organisations in the 1920s and 1930s depended to a large extent on a voluntary co-ordination
of ideas, movements and institutions that saw themselves as belonging to the same family, but
adopted the characteristics of a more successful sibling. A number of these ideas, in which
race and Volk were operative categories, had existed in earlier versions from the previous
century. The longer history of engaging with ideas of race and Volk in India and the world was
part of the same history, rather than a separate one, dating from the mid to late nineteenth
century. And the coalescing of ideological frameworks that were recognisably fascist or Nazi
took place in a context whereby the lesser strains in a worldwide framework of thinking
clustered around the more successful strains, borrowing and adapting from them and thereby
‘working towards the Nazis’—as they had worked towards the Italian Fascists before them.9
But this adaptation did not altogether abandon its right to manoeuvre, to select from a fascist
repertoire—and, later, to remould it to create new languages of legitimation. Indeed,
nationalism is particularly sensitive to the charge of being merely imitative: if the ‘authentic
genius’ of every people must find expression in the ‘nation’, obviously an imitative nation is a
contradiction in terms.
This essay does not discuss theories and theorisations of fascism and Nazism in any detail,
nor will it discuss a significant number of direct collaborative ventures between Nazi leaning
8
For a critique of which, see Paul Cohen, Discovering History in China (New York: Columbia University Press,
1996). On Indian ‘Auseinandersetzungen’ (with Italian Fascism and German Nazism), see Maria Framke, DelhiRom-Berlin: die indische Wahrnehmung von Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus 1922 1939 (Darmstadt:
Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2013), esp. p. 14.
9
‘Working towards the Nazis’ is a reference to Ian Kershaw’s idea of ‘working towards the F€uhrer’, in which he
says that ordinary Germans, ordinary bureaucrats and other Nazis anticipated what they thought were the
F€
uhrer’s wishes and sought to carry them out, which is what made an ordinarily weak dictatorship function. See
Ian Kershaw, ‘“Working Towards the F€uhrer”: Reflections on the Nature of the Hitler Dictatorship’, in
Contemporary European History, Vol. 2, no. 2 (July 1993), pp. 103 18. For a broader analysis on Indian
engagements with fascism, see Benjamin Zachariah, ‘Rethinking (the Absence of) Fascism in India, c.
1922 1945’, in Sugata Bose and Kris Manjapra (eds), Cosmopolitan Thought Zones: South Asia and the Global
Circulation of Ideas (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 178 209.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
4
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
and explicitly Nazi institutions and Indian co-workers or interlocutors (this has been done
elsewhere).10 It concentrates, instead, on providing close readings of a limited number of texts
and contexts to show some of the contours of the basis for Indo-fascist and Indo-Nazi
ideological affinities and exchanges, and on the idea of the Volk. The essay also concentrates a
good deal on ideas or ideological tendencies and frameworks to the neglect of actual
movements of (proto-)fascist paramilitary organisations and their political parent bodies, as
also the question of fascist aesthetics.11 Fascist movements are not original, not ideologically
consistent, are clearer about who or what they are against than what they are for, and are
willing to improvise or to borrow popular (and populist) elements from other movements.12 At
the same time, in order for resonances to be resonant, there must be a history of broadly
compatible ideas that become the basis of borrowings.
An analysis at the level of movements, the mobilisation of the alleged organic nation in the
form of paramilitary organisations, must also be carried out without sidestepping the question
of fascism. There is a populism at the empty core of fascisms, where the purificatory power of
violence, and the identification of the enemy within, operates at an important level beyond
ideology.13 It is possible to use a ‘style’ argument and suggest that aspirations to military or
paramilitary mobilisation dating back to before World War I were universal in the India of the
1920s and 1930s, but also partaking of a worldwide tendency, in other words as a ‘fascist
repertoire’ rather than as a ‘fascist minimum’.14 The ‘fascist minimum’ argument relies on an
agreed upon set of attributes without which a political movement is not yet, or not quite,
fascism, whereas a ‘fascist repertoire’ argument is less concerned with a check-list of
elements, all of which have to be present in order for the movement to meet the minimum
qualification as properly fascist. Instead, it enables us to see a wider repertoire from which
ideologues have the agency to choose. The repertoire tends to include an organicist and
primordialist nationalism, a controlling statism that disciplines the members of the organic
nation to act as, for and in that organic or v€
olkisch nation, which must therefore be duly
purified and preserved, in the service of which a paramilitarist tendency towards national
discipline is invoked, and the coherence of the repertoire is maintained by invoking a sense of
100
105
110
115
120
125
10
Q2
This is argued in more detail in Benjamin Zachariah, ‘A Voluntary Gleichschaltung? Perspectives from India
towards a Non-Eurocentric Understanding of Fascism’, in Transcultural Studies, Vol. 2 (Dec. 2014), pp. 8 44.
The literature on how Italian Fascism started to resemble German Nazism after the Axis began to form (in
particular with regard to anti-Semitism) has been useful in this regard. See, for instance, M.A. Ledeen, ‘The
Evolution of Italian Fascist Antisemitism’, in Jewish Social Studies, Vol. 37, no. 1 (Winter 1975), pp. 3 17. I
use the term ‘fascist repertoire’ in the manner of Federico Finchelstein’s use of the phrase ‘fascist catalogue of
ideas’. See Federico Finchelstein, Transatlantic Fascism: Ideology, Violence, and the Sacred in Argentina and
Italy, 1919 1945 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010), p. 6. See Benjamin Zachariah, Review of
Transatlantic Fascism in Social History, Vol. 36, no. 2 (May 2011), pp. 215 6, for an account of why this is
useful.
11
See the other essays in this collection.
12
Juan J. Linz, ‘Some Notes towards a Comparative Study of Fascism in Sociological Historical Perspective’, in
Walter Laqueur (ed.), Fascism: A Reader’s Guide (Harmondsworth: Pelican, [1976] 1979), pp. 13 78, esp.
pp. 29 31.
13
‘They subordinate thought and reason not to faith, as did the traditional Right, but to the promptings of the
blood and the historic destiny of the group. Their only moral yardstick is the prowess of the race, of the nation,
of the community. They claim legitimacy by no universal standard except a Darwinian triumph of the strongest
community’. Robert O. Paxton, ‘The Five Stages of Fascism’, in Journal of Modern History, Vol. 70, no. 1
(Mar. 1998), pp. 1 23, quote pp. 4 5.
14
Robert O. Paxton, The Anatomy of Fascism (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2004), p. 58; Zachariah, ‘Rethinking
(the Absence of) Fascism in India, c. 1922 1945’, p. 184; Franziska Roy, ‘Youth, Paramilitary Organisations
and National Discipline in South Asia, c. 1915 1950’, unpublished PhD thesis, Warwick University, 2013; and
Zachariah, ‘A Voluntary Gleichschaltung?’, pp. 8 44.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
130
5
continuous crisis and the potential for decay of the organic nation if that discipline and purity
is not preserved.15
It was recently pointed out that the Indian scholarship on the emergence of a Hindu Right
would do well to take seriously the writing of Alfred Rosenberg, who (unconventionally, for a
socialist at the time) saw fascism as a mass movement of the Right and not merely as a
distortion of bourgeois democracy caused by capitalism in crisis.16 This will prove to be a
fruitful intervention. However, we are still looking mainly at the predecessors of the presentday Sangh Parivar, and the movement of ideas must be seen in a wider perspective than that.
135
The (Re)framing of Political Legitimacy
140
145
150
155
160
Methodologically, it is worth reiterating that the framing of the (re)presentation of ideas must
be taken seriously: statements made, often in didactic mode, when a text seeks to present an
idea, often regarded a priori as ‘foreign’, to a new audience. The texts themselves are often
opaque without the framing statement to explain them. These framing statements are often
contained in ‘paratexts’17 that help us situate the author(s), something of their proclaimed
communicative intent, and the desired outcomes of their communication, which again is
illuminative of much more than the content of the text. A preface or introduction might
narrate, for instance, why national discipline, as practised in Fascist Italy, might be important
for ‘nation-building’ in India,18 or why the ‘race-pride’ exhibited by Nazi Germany needed to
be replicated in India, though directed against a different enemy.19 The political projects
sought to be enabled by the text itself are enabled and legitimated by the framing that is
suggested by the paratext. This becomes central to the use of the texts by readers as well as by
various intermediaries for whom their own roles in the furthering of the didactic project are set
out and clarified by the paratext.
In this respect, the by-now proverbial ‘autonomy of the text’ is matched by an ‘autonomy
of the paratext’, whose programmatic nature makes it important in its own right, apart from
the text to which it is attached. In another respect, the paratext seeks to constrain the
autonomy of the text by laying out the ways in which the text ought to be read and, therefore,
to curtail the range of readings that might otherwise be available: the author of the paratext,
whether or not s/he is the author of the text itself, seeks to maintain authorial control over the
dissemination of meanings in the furtherance of particular didactic projects. Here is a case for
not passing over the paratext quickly in our haste to get to the text, though of course this
should not be a call to ignore the text. There are, however, also instances of the paratexts
acquiring a life apart from the texts for which they were intended as paratexts, in these cases
becoming texts themselves and even acquiring paratexts in their own right. These texts are to
be found in English (the language in which many of these first appear) and in a number of
15
Michael Mann, Fascists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. ix, sees a ‘family resemblance’ in
terms of ‘organic nationalism, radical statism and paramilitarism’ between fascism and many tendencies not
quite fascist as yet; in other words, he proposes a distinction that does not quite hold; italics in original.
16
Jairus Banaji, ‘Trajectories of Fascism: Extreme Right Movements in India and Elsewhere’, in Jairus Banaji
(ed.), Fascism: Essays on Europe and India (Delhi: Three Essays Press, 2013), pp. 215 30.
17
See Gerard Genette and Marie Maclean, ‘Introduction to the Paratext’, in New Literary History, Vol. 22, no. 2
(Spring 1991), pp. 261 72. Paratexts include prefaces, introductions, guest forewords, communications among
publishers, authors, translators and distributors, advertisements and their placing, and reviews quoted either in
advertisements or in the books themselves.
18
See Zachariah, ‘Rethinking (the Absence of) Fascism in India’, pp. 190 2.
19
See M.S. Golwalkar, We or Our Nationhood Defined (Nagpur: Bharat Publications, 1939), although in the
main text in Golwalkar’s case.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
6
165
170
175
180
185
190
195
200
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
Indian languages (languages into which they are often translated). Through this, the processes
of mediation through which the attempt to domesticate and operationalise ‘foreign’ ideas,20
and the processes of legitimation or indices of legitimacy of politics in India, as also the
relevant engagements of that politics, can be better understood.
Another set of paratexts—acknowledgements, advertisements and institutional affiliations,
for instance—point to the networks that disseminated similar sets of ideas and created the
crossovers that enabled the movements and translations of ideas of which we are speaking
here. The paratextual material leads us into an important set of debates about terms and
concepts. It is often taken for granted that the same terms in the same language, or in selfevident translation, even when in use in different contexts, are more or less assimilable to one
another or, in other words, that they refer to similar concepts. This is especially true for the
modern world, certainly after the mid to late nineteenth century, where the consequences of
European or American hegemony in matters social, political or academic have ensured that a
few key concepts have been engaged with worldwide in broadly similar ways. What is often,
therefore, overlooked is that the same terms might actually refer to different concepts, and
similar concepts might be rendered by different terms. This could happen within a relatively
stable linguistic context or time frame if variations such as class context or specialised usage
are taken into account. But the question is pertinent in bilingual or multilingual contexts in a
significant way.
Let us take the case of an attempt to build a modern political vocabulary during colonial
rule. There is, firstly, the question of how particular concepts are received by a group of
people adept at using the new language: English, for the sake of our example. These adepts
then, often self-consciously, look for parallels or similarities in their language in order to
translate the new set of terms and become the mediators of a process of attempted
domestication of the new language. In this process, two sets of concepts, in two linguistic
milieux, are assimilated to one another and, in the process, gravitate towards one another. New
institutional or statist forms were given invented parallels and predecessors in a Sanskritic
world, terms were unearthed from an often mythologised, selectively unearthed and sanitised
past, brought forward and equated with modern concepts that were expressed in the English
language.21
This is of course a simplified model, but it begins to illustrate the problem of equating
terms with concepts unproblematically, assuming relatively stable meanings. What we can in
fact observe is an attempt to create, in a ‘native language’, a set of terms that express new
ideas from a newly-acquired but desirable language. But the semantic range of the neologisms
thus found might retain, especially to users without access to the new language, something of
the old usages, or in the case where the neologism is completely new, not catch on at all.22
Equally, concepts are not transferred in some pristine form because they do not exist
anywhere in a pristine form, constantly being negotiated and remade. The shift to a new
context might result in the same term, in the same language, among one set of users (let us say
one particular public domain) being used with reference to a concept that is subtly or
significantly different from the concept among another set of users of the same term.
20
On ‘domestication’, see Dhruv Raina and S. Irfan Habib, Domesticating Modern Science: A Social History of
Science and Culture in Colonial India (Delhi: Tulika, 2004).
21
For a good example of this, see Radhakumud Mookerji, Local Government in Ancient India (Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1919); and Radhakumud Mookerji, Indian Shipping: A History of the Sea-Borne Trade and
Maritime Activity of the Indians from the Earliest Times (London: Longman’s, Green & Co., 1912).
22
The reverse process, the incorporation of elements of the languages of the colonised into a new coloniser’s
language, and the shifts in meaning this has undergone, has been observed at least as far back as the HobsonJobson in this particular case.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
7
Volk and Authenticity: The Indigenist Imperative in Comparative Perspective
205
210
215
220
225
230
A near-perfect example of these processes can be found in the work of the academic innovator
and political ideologue Benoy Kumar Sarkar, who made an attempt to create a whole language
of the social sciences based on an ‘indigenous’, Indian set of concepts (Sanskrit-derived and,
therefore, not exactly in contemporaneous use).23 Near-perfect examples are inconvenient
precisely because they are so convenient and are, therefore, usually exceptional cases, but in
Sarkar’s case, he became a spokesman for, and a link figure in, several networks of scholars,
ideologues and political activists whose engagements ranged from the conservative to the
radical Right. His is the voice, and pen, that links a religious reform movement of middleclass political nationalism in the Ramakrishna Mission and the godman Swami Vivekananda
(recalling, if you will, the idea of a ‘political religion’ that some theorists on fascism have
taken as central)24 with the imperialist fantasies of the Greater India Society; one might add he
represents the project of a ‘Swadeshi’ intellectualism that sought, in a more sophisticated
manner than the present-day Sangh Parivar but inexorably with a similar project, to present,
and to perform, a glorious pre-colonial and predominantly ‘Hindu’ past for the Indian nationstate-to-be.25
Benoy Sarkar remains nonetheless a figure whose writings absorbed and incorporated many
of the political ideologies of his age, not necessarily always because he was convinced of them,
but because these were already legitimate frameworks through which he could communicate in
the several languages (French, German, Italian, English, Bengali) in which he wrote and to the
several publics he addressed. If he remained politically convinced of any creed, it was Nazism,
to which he remained attached in public as late as 1942. Benoy Sarkar, who despite his open
Nazism somehow seems to get a rather good press from academics working on India (all of
whom absolve him of believing any of what he tried so hard to propagate), was not the only
Indian with such a versatile academic and public life. A number of itinerant Indian intellectuals
spent much of the early twentieth century wandering around the world, engaging variously with
the diverse ideological currents of the time: examples of note, leaving aside those who explicitly
placed themselves on the Left of the political spectrum, would have to include Sarkar’s fellow
Swadeshi intellectual Tarak Nath Das, who was, by 1913, a US citizen and a spokesman for
immigrants from India in North America;26 Har Dayal, Hindu-nationalist-turned-anarchistturned-Hindu-nationalist;27 and Maulvi Muhammad Barkatullah, Tokyo University Hindustani
lecturer, Ghadr movement propagandist and unlikely co-conspirator of the Bolsheviks.28 We can
235
23
Benoy Kumar Sarkar’s revival is only just beginning. See Satadru Sen, Benoy Kumar Sarkar: Restoring the
Nation to the World (Delhi: Routledge, 2015); Manu Goswami, ‘AHR Forum: Imaginary Futures and Colonial
Internationalisms’, in American Historical Review, Vol. 117, no. 5 (2012), pp. 1461 85; and Kris Manjapra,
Age of Entanglement: German and Indian Intellectuals Across Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 2014), esp. pp. 143 60. Of these, only Satadru Sen has succeeded in bringing in something of a critical
reading, for in the ambiguous aftermath of the ‘post-colonial’ moment, to be ‘international’ or ‘cosmopolitan’ or
‘transnational’ is apparently to be worthy of celebration in and of itself.
24
Emilio Gentile, The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,
1996).
25
The classic work on the Swadeshi movement remains Sumit Sarkar, The Swadeshi Movement in 1903 1908
(New Delhi: People’s Publishing House, 1973).
26
Hugh Johnstone, The Voyage of the Komagata Maru: The Sikh Challenge to Canada’s Colour Bar
(Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, rev. ed. 1914).
27
Benjamin Zachariah, ‘A Long, Strange Trip: The Lives in Exile of Har Dayal’, in South Asian History and
Culture, Vol. 4, no. 4 (2013), pp. 574 92; and the biography by Emily Brown, Har Dayal: Hindu Revolutionary
and Rationalist (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1975).
28
G. Adhikari (ed.), Documents of the Communist Party of India, Vol. 1 (Delhi: People’s Publishing House, n.d.).
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
8
235
240
245
250
255
260
265
270
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
multiply the examples greatly, especially if we are to include lesser figures to whom the
spotlights of history have been less kind.
That Benoy Kumar Sarkar was an early enthusiast of Italian fascism who moved gracefully
on to Nazism as an enthusiastic supporter of the alleged innovations of Hitler’s Germany, and
of various aspects of Nazi politics, should be quite well known by now. 29 Sarkar welcomed
the elevation of Hitler to power, writing that ‘Hitler is the greatest of Germany’s teachers and
inspirers since Fichte’,30 and elaborating that:
What Young Germany needed badly was the moral idealism of a Vivekananda
multiplied by the iron strenuousness of a Bismarck. And that has been furnished by
Hitler, armed as he is with two among other spiritual slogans, namely, self-sacrifice
and fatherland.31
Sarkar saw the Jewish question as a Kulturkampf in the manner of the Catholic
confrontation with the Bismarckian state, which he said no one heard of any more today
because Bismarck had solved the problem. In a similar manner‚ ‘The Jewish question…[will]
be liquidated in Nazi Germany in a few years’.32 There is no obvious indication here that
Sarkar had anything like the physical liquidation of Jews in mind. The need for Nazi action
against Jews was allegedly because of the ‘over-Judaization of the public institutions in Berlin
as well as in other cities’, which made it necessary to ‘purge the public institutions of the Jews
and ordain for them a legitimate proportion of the services not exceeding the demographic
percentage’.33
In earlier times, Benoy Sarkar would also have been a logical volunteer for Right-wing
mobilisational attempts among Indians in Germany and attempts by the German Right to
move towards them. Fundamentally sympathetic towards a Germany humiliated and
dispossessed of its colonies after the Versailles peace settlement, he stated that Germany
would be a hope for the liberation of the colonies of other powers since Germany was now a
non-possessor of colonies:
It now remains for Germany to speak out and act in the manner in which the Orient
expects that a great race bent on the revindication of its claims should act both for its
own honour and national self-assertion as well as for opening out new vistas in
international relations and world-culture. The infiniteward energism of the ‘Fausts’ of
Young Asia as well as their Siegfried-like sadhana (Streben) for freedom will supply
the Volksseele of Germania not only with its spiritual nourishment but will also
furnish for it a bracing milieu of hopefulness and the perennial springs of creative
youth.34
In 1923, the ‘Bavarian extremist leader Hitler’, as British intelligence then referred to him,
was attempting to mobilise various maverick intellectuals from Turkey, Egypt and India
29
Giuseppe Flora, Benoy Kumar Sarkar and Italy: Culture, Politics, and Economic Ideology (Delhi: Italian
Embassy Cultural Centre, 1994).
30
Benoy Kumar Sarkar, The Hitler State: A Landmark in the Political, Economic and Social Remaking of the
German People (Calcutta: Insurance and Finance Review, 1933), p. 4.
31
Ibid., p. 13. Vivekananda, the first international godman produced by India, famously presented ‘Hinduism’ to
an international audience at the 1893 Congress of Religions in Chicago.
32
Ibid., p. 31.
33
Ibid.
34
Benoy Kumar Sarkar, ‘Asia and Eur-America’, in Benoy Kumar Sarkar, The Futurism of Young Asia and
Other Essays on the Relations between the East and the West (Berlin: Julius Springer, 1922), p. 37.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
275
280
285
290
295
9
behind his new party.35 Mussolini’s Italian Fascists initially had more recruits among Indians.
But both ideological and organisational Indo-German Nazi connections were formed
reasonably early. In 1928, an Indisches Ausschuss or India Institute of the parent organisation,
the Deutsche Akademie, itself founded in 1925, was established.36 The co-founders of the
India Institute were Dr. Karl Haushofer, a specialist in ‘geopolitics’ and one of the
popularisers of the theory of ‘Lebensraum’37 so beloved of the National Socialists, and the
Bengali nationalist Tarak Nath Das.38 Along with Benoy Kumar Sarkar, Das had been part of
the National Council of Education in Bengal, which had debated a ‘Swadeshi’ curriculum for
an Indian education that would be free from the domination of colonial models of education,
but they were also interested in the basis of an ‘authentic’ Indian nationalism. The Deutsche
Akademie’s India Institute awarded scholarships to about a hundred Indian students between
1929 and 1938. The Institute also became active in pro-German propaganda during the Nazi
period. It was incorporated into the NSDAP Auslands-Organisation (NSDAP-AO)39 and was
instrumental in starting Nazi cells in various firms in Calcutta which were under German
control. It also funded German lektors who taught German to Indian students desirous of
coming to Germany.40 Among the other Indians closely associated with the Institute in
Munich were Benoy Kumar Sarkar and Ashok Bose, the nephew of the future collaborator
with Nazism, Subhas Chandra Bose.41 A stream of Indian students continued to pass through
German universities and polytechnics throughout the 1930s, many of whom were to a greater
or lesser extent impressed by the Nazis; the India Institute of the Deutsche Akademie
continued to fund a number of these and to provide back-up support.42 Tarak Nath Das and
Benoy Kumar Sarkar continued to be associated with an extended circle of Nazis in the new
Reich, not least through the Deutsche Akademie.43 Some of the students returned to a home
university which also had by this time some institutionalised support for National Socialism,
such as Benares Hindu University or Aligarh Muslim University or Calcutta University, where
Benoy Kumar Sarkar was the leading light of its German Club.44
35
L/PJ/ 12/102, 1923, f. 2, India Office Records, British Library, London (hereafter IOR).
R51/1-16 & 144, Bundesarchiv, Berlin.
37
The term ‘Lebensraum’, borrowed from a biological idea of habitat, was used to make the claim that the
German Volk needed more space for itself and was entitled to expand its territories.
38
This is acknowledged in the official history of the Institute, to be found at Indien-Institut e.V. M€unchen [http://
www.indien-institut.de/en/chronicle, accessed 20 April 2013]. Note the sudden jump over the Nazi period:
nothing is said for the time between 1932 and 1946.
39
The NSDAP was the National Socialist German Workers Party.
40
‘Strictly Secret: An Examination of the Activities of the Auslands Organization of the National Socialistische
Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (sic), Part II: In India’, Indian Political Intelligence (IPI), file L/PJ/12/505, ff. 80-81,
IOR.
41
Publicity materials for the India Institute, Munich, distributed on the occasion of its 75th anniversary in 2003,
do not mention Ashok Bose or Benoy Kumar Sarkar. An earlier version of the Indien-Institut’s website did list
their names [http://www.indien-institut.de, accessed 20 May 2010], but this has been replaced by the version
cited above. Leonard Gordon, Brothers Against the Raj: A Biography of Indian Nationalists Sarat and Subhas
Chandra Bose (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990), pp. 256 7, mentions Ashok Bose’s presence in
Munich from 1931 as a student of applied chemistry. Benoy Sarkar was also a regular contributor to Karl
Haushofer’s journal, Geopolitik.
42
R51/16, Bundesarchiv, Berlin. Records of students are few and far between, and it is unclear as to whether
they were obliterated by the vicissitudes of war or were deliberately destroyed.
43
‘Akademie zur wissenschaftliche Erforschung und zur Pflege des Deutschtums’, R51/1, rules of the
association, 1925, end of file, n.p.g, Bundesarchiv, Berlin.
44
Home Department (Special), files 830A, 1939 and 830(i), 1939, Maharashtra State Archives, Bombay. See
also Eugene D’Souza, ‘Nazi Propaganda in India’, in Social Scientist, Vol. 28, no. 5/6 (May June 2000),
pp. 77 90, based on the above two files, but lacking a context for them.
36
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
10
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
To consider Sarkar merely a Nazi is to fail to attribute agency to an extremely creative
individual. But to see him merely as an extremely creative individual—even as he became the
spokesman for many of his generation, and indeed precisely because of that—is to miss the
wider points. One strand of thinking in India always wished to hold on to the alleged spiritual
core of ‘Indian’ civilisation, to amplify its anti-individualism, and to develop its v€
olkisch
elements—without necessarily asserting that Indian civilisation was otherworldly and
spiritual.45 The renewal and strengthening of a ‘nation’ otherwise liable to decay ought to
come from the ‘folk-element’: this was understood and actively promoted in India.46 Similarly
influential was the organicist idea of a nation, combined with a militarist understanding of
mass mobilisation in the period leading up to and after World War I;47 this fantasy of military
prowess drew on emotional responses to British insults about the effeminacy of Indians, and
of Bengalis in particular,48 and can be seen in the hypermasculinity of Subhas Chandra Bose’s
plagiarism of the design of Mussolini’s uniform, boots and all, for his own use as he strutted
around on horseback as the leader of the Bengal Volunteers during the 1928 Calcutta
Congress.49 A longer interest in reviving ‘Arya Dharm’ or the ‘Hindu race’, and linking it up
with European, and Theosophical, understandings of the Aryan ‘race’ as the most evolved of
the historically great races, and of Indian attempts to link up with these discussions as
resources of legitimation, played a long-term role in mobilising potential recruits to an
Aryanism that the Nazis also mobilised to good effect.50 The Aryanism of the Theosophists
was of interest and importance to early Nazi formations in Germany and Austria.51
Benoy Sarkar’s professed need for a return to authenticity, which we might
productively read as similar to, but militantly separate from Gandhi’s Hind Swaraj,52
thus stood in a long tradition of colonial Indian thinking, and about the pre-existence of
worthwhile and at least potentially modern historical examples and institutions in (mostly
ancient) India. Sarkar was more original, better read and, thus, less prone to using the
crudest and most obvious examples for his arguments, avoiding the idea that there was a
pure and untouched essence to ‘India’, but much of the driving force in his writing is an
almost post-colonialist insistence that India could provide or had provided the world with
great and worthwhile intellectual products. He extended this argument to whatever would
hold it, on one occasion reminding readers that Nietzsche, whose idea of the Will to
300
305
310
315
320
325
45
Q3
In this connection, see Sarkar, The Futurism of Young Asia and Other Essays, esp. the title essay, ‘The
Futurism of Young Asia’, pp. 1 22.
46
See also Sayantani Adhikary, ‘The Bratachari Movement and the Invention of a “Folk Tradition”’, in this
volume.
47
Roy, ‘Youth, Paramilitary Organisations and National Discipline in South Asia, c. 1915 1950’.
48
Mrinalini Sinha, Colonial Masculinity: The ‘Manly Englishman’ and the ‘Effeminate Bengali’ in the Late
Nineteenth Century (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995); and John Rosselli, ‘The Self-Image
of Effeteness: Physical Education and Nationalism in Nineteenth-Century Bengal’, in Past & Present, no. 86
(Feb. 1980), pp. 121 48.
49
Pictures of this iconic moment abound; the uniform itself is centrally displayed in a glass case at Netaji
Bhavan, Subhas Bose’s former residence in Calcutta, now a museum.
50
For the larger argument behind this, see Zachariah, ‘The Invention of Hinduism for National Use’,
pp. 153 204.
51
See, for instance, Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their
Influence on Nazi Ideology (New York: New York University Press, 1992); and Eric Kurlander, ‘The Orientalist
Roots of National Socialism? Nazism, Occultism, and South Asian Spirituality, 1919 1945’, in Joanne Miyang
Cho, Eric Kurlander and Douglas T. McGetchin (eds), Transcultural Encounters between Germany and India:
Kindred Spirits in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 155 69.
52
Benjamin Zachariah, Developing India: An Intellectual and Social History, c. 1930 1950 (Delhi: Oxford
University Press, 2005), pp. 168 73, makes this point about the Swadeshi context for Gandhi’s Hind Swaraj.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
11
Power he greatly admired, had learned his philosophy from the Manusmriti and his
politics from the Arthashastra.53
‘To the folk-element of all ages in India’ is the dedication for his book The Folk Element in
Hindu Culture.54 ‘In the reconstruction of Indian history, modern scholarship has to be
devoted more and more to the exposition of the influence that the masses of the country have
ever exerted in the making of its civilization’, Benoy Sarkar programmatically declared.55 To
understand this folk element, one must have undergone an ‘initiation amongst the folk’.56 He
then made a number of points in advance of the main text, and understandably so, because the
text itself is intimidatingly technical and opaque:
330
335
1. The masses and the folk have contributed to the making of Hindu Culture in all its phases
no less than the court and the classes (sic).
2. Secular, material and social interests, as contrasted with the other-worldly and spiritual
ideals, have had considerable influence in moulding Hindu life and thought.
3. The caste-system has never been a disintegrating factor in Hindu communal existence, and
is most probably a very recent institution.
4. Hinduism is an eclectic and ever-expansive socio-religious system built up through the
assimilation of diverse ethnic, natural and spiritual forces during the successive ages of
Indian history.
5. There has ever been an attempt to govern the folk-customs, popular faith, image-worship
and public festivals by the transcendental conceptions of the Divinity of Man and the
Transitoriness of this World. The folklore of the Hindus is nothing but the adaptation of
their metaphysical culture-lore to the instincts and aptitudes of the ‘man in the street’. …57
340
345
There was, thus, a glorification of a sort of instinctive folk wisdom that was more authentic
than all the cultural sophistication of supposed higher forms—students of various Right-wing
populisms would find this theme readily recognisable. Culturally, Sarkar further declared,
there could be discerned a continuity across Asia of folk forms of religion, which meant that
distinctions made between Buddhist, Saiva and Vaisnava did not hold.58 This was more or less
a corollary to the ‘Greater India’ arguments made by some of his colleagues, whom he cited
approvingly in his books and who, likewise, cited him approvingly in theirs,59 who argued
from the presence of Hindu and Buddhist monuments in South-East Asia that a ‘Greater India’
of a cultural and economic expansionist sort could be discerned in the history of those
350
355
53
Q4
Benoy Kumar Sarkar, ‘The Influence of India on Western Civilisation’, in Journal of Race Development, Vol.
9, (1918 19), pp. 101 2. Originally, this was an address given at Columbia University, New York, in April
1918.
54
Benoy Kumar Sarkar, ‘Dedication’, The Folk-Element in Hindu Culture: A Contribution to Socio-Religious
Studies in Hindu Folk-Institutions (London: Longman’s, Green & Co., 1917).
55
‘Preface’, ibid., p. vii.
56
Ibid., p. ix, quoting Professor R.R. Marrett’s paper ‘Folklore and Psychology’, read before the London
Folklore Society.
57
Ibid., p. x.
58
Ibid., p. xvi. See also Benoy Kumar Sarkar, Chinese Religion Through Hindu Eyes: A Study in the Tendencies
of Asiatic Mentality (Shanghai: The Commercial Press, 1916), from which he quotes at length in the ‘Preface’ to
The Folk Element in Hindu Culture.
59
See Mookerji, Indian Shipping; Radhakamal Mukherji, Borderlands of Economics (London: George Allen &
Unwin Ltd, 1925); and author’s ‘Preface’ in Sarkar, The Folk Element in Hindu Culture. It should be noted that
they do not merely cite each other’s works in a few footnotes, they declare their intellectual debts and
allegiances strongly.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
12
360
365
370
375
380
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
countries.60 A sort of spiritual Lebensraum thus opened out for Greater India. The connections
among the scholars of the ‘Greater India Society’, based in Calcutta, Visva Bharati, Allahabad
or Benares Hindu University, should be noted, and for their popularisers, notably the Hindu
Mahasabha supporter and publisher journalist Ramananda Chatterjee, there was a
territorially bounded India that was ‘Hindu’ and eternal, but the ‘culture’ of India was entitled
to move freely and colonise other parts of the world.
The ‘folk-element’ argument solved another problem of inventing a nation: upper-caste
Hindu textual or scriptural traditions would yield nothing of the numbers required in a nationbuilding game. Meanwhile, non-caste Hinduism, if appropriated through this idea of folk
practices, could provide an idea of the organicist unity of the community that was to become
the nation. And the fantasy of mobilising the masses from above without losing control was
greatly enabled by the hope of an organic national discipline of the Volk.
We should pause here to outline the affinities of ideology or ideas that had longer,
nineteenth and early twentieth century, pre-fascist histories. It is necessary at least to note
their existence. It is also far from obvious in which directions the ideas ‘flowed’: if some Nazi
mysticism had ‘Indian’ roots, and ideas of Aryan civilisation or supremacy transcended the
barriers of ‘West’ and ‘East’, this was to be expected, as the public arenas of ‘West’ and ‘East’
were not sealed off from one another, nor indeed separated in any way but polemically. And if
the exact relationships between v€
olkisch, organicist and fascist ideas are not clear, with
eclectic sets of ideas co-existing in the writings of users of Volk as a category (psychoanalysis,
biology, race),61 we could say with some certainty that the former sets of ideas were definitely
a part of a fascist repertoire, even if they were not only elements of a fascist repertoire. There
was a performative authenticity in recreating displays of v€
olkisch energy in public: these were
ideas as practices as much as they were ideas turned into practices, as the folk ‘revival’ of
Benoy Sarkar’s friend and co-conversationalist Gurusaday Dutt sought to mobilise.62
Leading the ‘Folk Element’
385
390
But the ‘folk element’ on its own was not exactly to be given autonomy without leadership
being exercised strongly on its behalf, and upon it. Benoy Sarkar’s appreciation of the
movement of the holy man Ramakrishna and his educated middle-class disciple Vivekananda
is worth looking at again in this connection. It might be recalled that Vivekananda’s
importance to India was Sarkar’s comparative yardstick for the importance of Hitler to
Germany. In a pamphlet derived from a speech and published in 1936,63 Benoy Sarkar’s
Ramakrishna is a v€
olkisch hero and his Vivekananda is a Germanic romantic. Of the
unlettered guru Ramakrishna, Benoy Sarkar wrote:
60
On the Greater India Society, see Susan Bayly, ‘Imagining “Greater India”: French and Indic Visions of
Colonialism in the Indic Mode’, in Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 38, no. 3 (2004), pp. 703 44, and also current
work by Jolita Zabarskaite, ‘Greater India in Indian Scholarship and in the Public Domain’, unpublished paper. I
am grateful to the author for sharing this with me.
61
Mukherji, Borderlands of Economics.
62
Frank Korom, ‘Gurusaday Dutt, Vernacular Nationalism, and the Folk Culture Revival in Colonial Bengal’, in
Firoze Mahmud and Sharani Zaman (eds), Folklore in Context (Dhaka: The University Press, 2010),
pp. 256 93; Frank Korom, ‘Inventing Traditions: Folklore and Nationalism as Historical Process in Bengal’, in
D. Rohtman-Augustin and M. Pourzqhovic (eds), Folklore and Historical Process (Zagreb: Institute of Folklore
Research, 1989), pp. 59 83.
63
Benoy Kumar Sarkar, The Might of Man in the Social Philosophy of Ramakrishna and Vivekananda
(Mylapore, Madras: Sri Ramakrishna Math, 1936), printed at the Commercial Gazette Press by J. Lahiri, 6, Parsi
Bagan Lane, Calcutta 2.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
13
Neither the category ‘world-forces’, nor the category, ‘nationalism’, would have
conveyed any meaning to his life. And yet his Kathamrita, ‘the nectar of words’
(1882 86), has turned out to be the most dynamic social philosophy of the age, and
this has created for him a position of one of the great ‘remakers’ of mankind.64
395
Ramakrishna, for Benoy Sarkar, epitomised the ‘folk’. His was a ‘folk-language’, his wisdom
was ‘folk-wisdom’, his logic, ‘folk-logic’.65 His message of the equality of faiths, of
heterogeneous roads to freedom, laid deeper foundations for ‘inter-racial’ harmony. But
Ramakrishna was also somewhat akin to Fichte:
400
Fichte’s attitudes are well-known. Writing in 1808 for Young Germany he said: ‘Euch
ist das groessere Geschick zuieil (sic) geworden, uberhaupt (sic) das Reich des
Geistes und der Vernunft zu begruenden (To you has been assigned the greater
destiny, namely, that you have to establish the Empire of the spirit and reason), und
die rohe koerperliche Gewalt insgesamt als beherrschendes der Welt zu vernichten
(and that you have to annihilate raw physical power as a determinant of the world)’. It
is this supremacy of the spirit and reason, and the emancipation of the mind from
matter, or rather the mind’s dominion over the world that constitutes the Leitmotif of
Ramakrishna’s sayings.66
405
In this synthesis of the transcendental and the positive he is but a chip of the old Hindu
block coming down from the Vedic, and perhaps still earlier times… . And it is on the
strength of this synthesis, again, that his Narendra, the Vivekananda thundered a
Young India into being, the India of economic energism as well as of spiritual
creativeness, of material science and technocracy as well as of self-control and social
service.67
410
415
The ‘moral and spiritual values’ of Ramakrishna and Vivekananda ‘were destined to constitute
the living religion of our country, of our masses and classes, during the present century.68 In
those contexts Vivekananda was described as the Carlyle of Young India and credited with the
gospel of Napoleonic energism and triumphant defiance of the Western chauvinists’.69
Vivekananda was ‘an Avatar of youth-force’, a socialist (but not like Marx, rather a romantic
socialist like St. Simon), a nationalist and an internationalist, who ‘served to establish the
universalistic, cosmopolitan and humane basis of all religious and social values’. He was, ‘like
Fichte, the father of the German youth-movement, an exponent of nationalism and socialism’,
preaching the ‘gospel…of energism, of mastery over the world, over the conditions
surrounding life, of human freedom, of individual liberty, of courage trampling down
cowardice, of world-conquest’, just as the West was ‘groping in the dark’ for a solution along
420
425
Q5
Q6
64
Sarkar, The Might of Man, p. 1. Sarkar cited himself, referring to his ‘Bengali Positivism in the Sociology of
Values’, Calcutta Review (Jan. 1936).
65
Ibid., p. 4.
66
Ibid., p. 9.
67
Ibid., pp. 11 2. Sarkar cited himself again, referring to his Positive Background of Hindu Sociology, Vols.
1 2 (Allahabad: 1914, and 1921, 1926); and The Political Institutions of the Hindus (Leipzig: 1922).
68
Sarkar, The Might of Man, pp. 12 3. Again, citing himself, he says that he had anticipated this more than two
decades ago in his Vishwa-Shakti (World Forces) (Calcutta, 1914, first published in the Grihastha, Calcutta,
1913).
69
Sarkar, The Might of Man, p. 12.
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
14
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
those lines. Nietzsche’s Also Sprach Zarathustra ‘had awakened mankind to the need for a
more positive, humane and joyous life’s philosophy than that of the New Testament’.
Vivekananda was a ‘pioneer of a revolution’ and ‘the positive and constructive counterpart’ to
Nietzsche’s ‘destructive criticism’. The doctrine of ‘energism, moral freedom, individual
liberty, and man’s mastery over the circumstances of life’ was promulgated by Immanuel
Kant and, later, by Robert Browning. The ancients already had the Upanishads and the Gita.70
Oswald Spengler, in his Untergang des Abendlandes, had been interested in the
transformation of epochs:
430
in what the Hindus would call Yugantara, in the ‘cultures yet to be’. In so far as
Spengler is looking for the ‘new element of inwardness’ such as can sponsor the
regeneration of life for the ‘world-historical phase of several centuries upon which we
ourselves are entering’, he is echoing the Vivekanandist doctrine of Man-born-toconquer-Naturism.71
435
Sarkar’s parallels between Indian and German history are slightly strained—he cites Karl
Haushofer in connection with being superior to many, inferior to a few, but not among the
last72—and in his summary of Vivekananda’s message to the Bengali people, Sarkar quotes an
1897 speech ‘seven or eight years before the Bengali “ideas of 1905” take a definite shape’.
Vivekananda’s speech in Benoy Sarkar’s summary goes like this:
440
‘We have to conquer the world’, he declares, ‘That we have to! India must conquer the
world and nothing less than that is my ideal. It may be very big, it may astonish many
of you, but it is so. We must conquer the world or die. There is no other alternative.
The sign of life is expansion; we must go out, expand, show life or degrade, fester and
die. There is no other alternative’.73
445
In this context, citing Haushofer begins to make sense. Sarkar celebrates the fact that the
Ramakrishna Mission has begun to expand all over the world: Britain, Spain, Czechoslovakia,
Poland, France and Germany all have editions of Ramakrishna’s and Vivekananda’s works. ‘It
is but the six thousand year old Indian tradition of digvijaya, World-conquest, and elevation of
the most diverse races and classes to soul-enfranchising ideals and activities that Vivekananda
and after him the Swamis of the Ramakrishna Order have been pursuing under modern
conditions, thereby exhibiting the virility and strenuousness of Hindu humanism and
spirituality’.74
450
455
Akhand Bharat and ‘Greater India’
We should recall here the invention of an Aryan Volk via Theosophy and neo-Hinduism (with
borrowings from the Orientalists), in order to stress the ambiguities of the appropriation.75
460
70
Ibid., pp. 15 7.
Ibid., pp. 17 8.
72
Ibid., p. 24. Here, there is a citation of Karl Haushofer, Jenseits der Grossmaechte (Leipzig: 1932), p. 489.
73
Sarkar, The Might of Man, p. 25.
74
Ibid., p. 28. Citations on this point inevitably include himself: The Futurism of Young Asia (Berlin: 1922), as
well as P.T. Hoffmann, Der indische und der deutsche Geist von Herder bis zur Romantik (Tuebingen: 1915);
and Helmut von Glasenapp, Indien in der Dichtung und Forschung des deutschen Ostens (Koenigsburg: 1930).
75
Zachariah, ‘The Invention of Hinduism for National Use’, pp. 153 204.
71
Q7
Q8
Q9
Q10
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
460
15
Towards the close of World War II, with the ‘Pakistan’ claim endangering the apparently
organic unity of ‘India’, the historian Radhakumud Mookerji found himself the spokesman for
the protagonists of an undivided India or Akhand Bharat as president of the Akhand Bharat
Conference at Lucknow University in January 1945. He declared:
I must assert once for all on behalf of Hindus, and with all the emphasis that I can
command as President of this All India Conference of Hindu leaders, that the
homeland of the Hindus through milenniums of their history has been nothing short of
the whole of India stretching in its continental expanse from Kashmir to the Cape,
from Nanga Parvat and Amarnath to Madura and Bameshwaram and from Dwarka to
Puri. The Hindus through the ages have built up the whole of this continent as their
sacred, inviolable, and indivisible Mother Country and infused into it their very blood.
Since the days of the Rigveda, the earliest work of India and of the world, since the
dawn of history, the Aryan Hindus have conquered and civilised this continent and
breathed into it their very soul.76
465
470
He then makes peculiar use of a well-known terminological argument:
475
the term HINDU is not a religious but a territorial term, and any native of India,
according to Persians is a HINDU. Historically, every Muslim is a Hindu, and we may
give the quietus to all communal problems on this basis by taking India as the country
of one Nation called the Hindus.77
There follows a geographical argument to add to the terminological one:
480
India has been fashioned by Nature as an indisputable geographical unit marked out
from the rest of the world by well-defined boundaries and fixed frontiers about which
there can be no doubt or uncertainty.78
485
490
Belonging to ‘India’ thus was a matter of Blut und Boden, quite literally: a ‘natural’ geography
and sacred ties of blood made India an indivisible whole.
In his earlier work, Radhakumud Mookerji—who always warmly thanked Benoy Kumar
Sarkar in the acknowledgements and prefaces to his various books—claimed that ‘India’ had
always been a unity and, indeed, that ancient India already had had a nationalism.79 His
Nationalism in Hindu Culture was, unsurprisingly, a Theosophical publication, given that the
Theosophical Society played a major role in defining ‘Hinduism’ as a system, a world religion
and civilisation, and as ‘Aryan’, and even, through Annie Besant’s Central Hindu College in
Benares (the predecessor of Benares Hindu University), prescribed what Hinduism was.80
76
Radhakumud Mookerji, Akhand Bharat (Bombay: Hind Kitabs, Feb. 1945), pp. 4 5.
Ibid., p. 8.
78
Ibid., p. 9. Earlier work, which he cites, includes his own The Fundamental Unity of India (From Hindu
Sources) (1913). Many of these started as articles in Dawn or Modern Review, making for a very erudite
exclusivism underpinned by impeccable Swadeshi credentials.
79
Radhakumud Mookerji, The Fundamental Unity of India (From Hindu Sources) (London: Longman’s, Green
& Co., 1914); Radhakumud Mookerji, Nationalism in Hindu Culture (London: Theosophical Publishing House,
1921); and Radhakumud Mookerji, Local Government in Ancient India (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed.,
1920).
80
See Leah Renold, A Hindu Education: Early Years of the Benares Hindu University (Delhi: Oxford University
Press, 2005).
77
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
16
495
500
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies
Aryan Path, the journal of the Theosophical Lodge of India, led by the sometime labour
organiser and Parsi Theosophist B.P. Wadia, introduced Kalidas Nag’s article on ‘Greater
India’ as recalling Madame Blavatsky’s statement in Isis Unveiled ‘that “India was the AlmaMater, not only of the civilization, arts, and sciences, but also of all the great religions of
antiquity”’.81 Mookerji was a member of the Greater India Society, his early book Indian
Shipping having centrally dealt with the importance of ‘greater India’ to mainland India,82 as
had his colleague Romesh Chandra Majumdar’s Ancient Indian Colonies in the Far East.83
There seems to have been no contradiction seen in asserting an India with a community of
blood and within boundaries ‘fashioned by Nature’, and celebrating the spilling out of these
boundaries into an Asia that was a ‘Greater India’ in an earlier phase of Indian colonial
greatness.
Some Conclusions
505
510
515
520
525
The Volk and the organic unity of the nation were, as every ‘nation-builder’ knew, to be
created if necessary via eugenic efforts and national disciplinary formations. The alleged
honesty of a ‘folk’ religion as the true expression of the people was an attractive solution to
the problem of organic unity, but this true expression was always to be interpreted by relevant
and capable authorities. Theorists of fascism speak of ‘palingenesis’ or national rebirth in
terms of the importance of building the community or nation to be, as recovery from or
recompense for historic injustice.84 This would apply quite clearly to India.
Affinities with fascism generically are quite evident, and this route to fascism was not a
matter of imitation, but of a shared set of assumptions and thinking. Of the chaotic and
sometimes contradictory and unresolved thoughts represented in the attempts at systematic
thinking of even the best intellectuals of the times, we might say that much of this is at best a
fascist direction. And, indeed, it is possible to choose better examples if one is but searching
for unambiguously fascist ones. But the point of this essay is to show that the concerns,
anxieties, themes and assumptions behind many fascist ideas, and even more ideas that were
close to fascism, existed in an ‘Indian’ set of public debates that were not, and could not have
been, purely ‘Indian’.
A process of the unfolding of Ann€
aherungsm€
oglichkeiten—the possibilities of coming
closer together—with European fascisms that we are happier to recognise as fascism did not,
therefore, depend entirely on a process of copying ideas, imperfectly or otherwise; or in
another formulation, if Indians were not to be merely consumers of ‘modernity’, but also its
producers, why does this not apply to fascism as well?85 Perhaps equally importantly, in
dealing with a question such as the fascist propensities of a political order, it is necessary to
treat genealogy and teleology together, writing history backwards as well as forwards, as I
suggested earlier. This is why my choice of presentation of texts and debates in this essay does
81
Aryan Path (Jan. 1933), p. 3.
On the ‘Greater India’ idea, see Kalidas Nag, Greater India: A Study in Indian Internationalism (Calcutta:
Greater India Society Bulletin No. 1, November 1926).
83
R.C. Majumdar, Ancient Indian Colonies in the Far East, Vol. 1: Champa (Lahore: Punjab Sanskrit Book
Depot, 1927).
84
Roger Griffin, The Nature of Fascism (London: Routledge, 1991), p. ix.
85
Why must Indians simply be reduced to the role of perpetual consumers of modernity, and not its producers (to
borrow an argument from elsewhere)? Partha Chatterjee, ‘Whose Imagined Communities?’, The Nation and its
Fragments (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 3 13. I am not sure Chatterjee was referring
to fascism, but the argument can usefully be transposed to deal with fascism.
82
CSAS_A_1078948.3d (CSAS)
(174£248mm)
17-08-2015
6:57
At the Fuzzy Edges of Fascism
530
17
not follow a chronological framework in any simple way: there is not a ‘before and after
fascism’ tale to be told in any unproblematic way.
As regards fascism, of those who saw the implications of their ideas and their actions,
some pulled back. Others did not. A distinctively Indian fascism was and is possible, but is
still recognisable as a generic fascism. If we are to understand it as different, we need to
understand what it is different from and, therefore, we must have comparative parameters.