Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2012
Introduction Besides environmental sociology, many other sciences investigate the complex relations between society and nature. Numerous discipline-based and interdisciplinary research approaches, theoretical concepts and definitions of research objects compete and coexist with one another. For some, this situation indicates a diversity of perspectives appropriate to the complexity of the research object, a diversity which opens the possibility of achieving complementary forms of knowledge through cooperative research projects. For others, this 'pluralism of competing paradigms' is an expression of a post-modern arbitrariness, one that justifies academic rivalries and exclusion mechanisms. Again and again the hope has been raised that an overarching frame of reference could counter the arbitrariness that unfolds with this diversity. Critics of pluralism can bring a strong argument to bear here: If research on the relations between society and nature is characterized by such ...
Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001
Landscape Ecology, 2001
Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009
Sociological Review, 2010
2003
Today’s landscapes are—as part of the urbanisation process of the countryside—increasingly being used for several functions and interests such as housing, recreation, business and production, water management, nature conservation, agriculture, and infrastructure (Antrop, 2000; Valk, 2002a; Tress & Tress, 2003). Areas are under increasing pressure because more and more demands are being placed on them (figure 1). All these interests compete with each other for influence on, and space in, the countryside. However, as areas cannot be continuously enlarged, more and more functions must be integrated simultaneously in a given landscape. This development challenges future landscape research, planning and management and calls for system innovations. Figure 1: Different interests in and functions of landscapes
2003
Some personal thoughts are discussed based upon the author’s experience of landscape research as a geographer to whom the holistic character of landscape as the result of natural processes and human activities is obvious and thus the interdisciplinary approach as well. The growing demand for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape research is recent and is an attempt to reintroduce lost skills. Interdisciplinarity was lost when scientific disciplines were specialising and society became too complex to be comprehended as a whole. The scientific specialisation develops parallel to the economic specialisation and the market-oriented competition. These processes change landscapes but also the way research is done. Interand transdisciplinarity are often used in a very pragmatic way that is when it is convenient for getting funding, strengthens the position of one’s own discipline or helps promotion. Also, landscape sciences hardly receive a solid position in the academic world....
Nour Foundation, London, 2024
Cengel 8va Edición. Termodinámica, 2009
Digital Literature Review, 2018
Journal of the Environmental Sciences, 2013
Current history, 2020
Infection and Immunity, 1986
BMC Surgery, 2014
this Proceedings, 16 th …, 2008
Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 2003
Studia Archiwalne
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 2006