Reviews
361
For those libraries that need access to current congressional
information,
this service offers a
tremendous
amount of resources.
It is not inexpensive
however, so libraries will need to be careful
in analyzing
the cost/benefit
ratio. A very important
and valid statement
appears early in the
W&~ingron
Alert manual: “your satisfaction
with this congressional
tracking system is directly
Even an experienced
searcher will find
linked to your knowledge
of how to operate the system.”
the first few attempts
with this system confusing.
Wmlzington
Alert recommends
intermediate
training for all subscribers
and so does this reviewer.
Once staff is trained, however,
this will be
an outstanding
resource for any library able to subscribe to it.
NOTES
I, Duncan
M. Aldrich,
Review
of Legi-.S/~rr,
Gooernt~enr
Puh/ic~rrtion.s Reuie~
University
U.S. Military Uses of Space,
S. Blanton, Malcolm Byrne,
A. Wallace, series technical
Archive,
1991. 724 p. Glfide
including Guide rend Itzdc_x.
16 (May/June
1989):304-07.
RENATA G. COATES
Reference
Services
of California,
San Diego
LaJolla, CA 92093
USA zyxwvuts
19451991. Jeffrey Richelson, Consultant and Project Director. Thomas
Margarita S. Studemeister,
and Lisa Thompson,
series editors. David
editor. Alexandria:Chadwyck-Healey.
Inc. and the National Security
rrnd Index, $945.00. 708 microfiches,
$4.200.00 for entire publication
As soon as the technology
became available to exploit space for military purposes,
the leading
nations of the world began to pour money into research and development
and operations of a myriad
of space-based
and space-traversing
systems that would provide even a slight edge against a potential
opponent.
From the very beginning of the Cold War, two important uses immediately
came to the
fore. The first was the application of orbiting camera platforms for reconnaissance
of foreign military
installation
and industrial facilities. The second was the development
of ballistic missiles carrying
nuclear weapons
for use in the event of war. Additional
uses have been added since that time:
navigation,
communications,
guidance and tracking, defensive systems, etc. U.S. Military Usc~s oj
Spwe,
IY4_5-IYYI is an important reference work that compiles into a usable form some of the key
documents
associated
with this subject during the era of the Cold War. This review will comment
on the two parts of the effort, the guide and the microfiche collection of documents.
The guide consists of IO main major parts. After a short introduction
describing the purpose and
methodology
of the document
collection and dissemination
process-many
of the documents
were
declassified
and obtained by use of the Freedom of Information
Act-and
a guide for the use of
the index and microfiche
set, there follows a series of general sections on the military and space.
A general essay by Jeffrey Richelson provides the barest of introductions
to the issue of military
activities
in space and will be useful principally
to beginning students.
A 4I-page chronology
of
space activities by the U.S. military is also included, but much of the information
contained
in it
is readily available in more detail elsewhere.
and it does not provide a reliable reference
to the
documents
contained in the microfiche collection.
A chronological
launch listing from 1957 through
1990, an acronyms
glossary,
a technical terms glossary, a space systems glossary,
a biographical
directory (called here a names glossary), and an organizations
glossary then follow before the actual
catalog of documents.
Each of these provides important background information useful to researchers
working with the microfiche.
The heart of the Guide crnd Index is the catalog of 708 documents.
Each entry contains a document
number assigned by the series editors and keyed to a microfiche in the collection.
It also includes
much of the pertinent
information
about the document:
its title, date, classification,
distribution
information,
type of document
(letter, directive,
etc.), number of pages included in the microfiche
collection,
originator,
destination,
amount of material excised from classified documents
during the
declassification
process,
location of originals where appropriate,
variant documents,
and a brief
description
of information
in the document.
Following this catalog, the editors provide three different
362
Reviews
indices to the documents:
one organized by name of individual. one arranged by organization,
and
the last organized by subject. All are alphabetical
in arrangement.
The documents
that the G/lit/r zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCB
trnd Indc.\describes are a wide-ranging
set with value at a variety
of levels. Out of the total of 708 documents,
virtually all relate to policy issues in some way and
are spread across the spectrum of Department
of Defense (DOD) activities. The vast majority were
originated in the post-1970 period (494 documents),
but 130 date from the 196Os, and 83 deal with
the earlier period. Of these documents
most are reports and memoranda
of some type, but cables,
regulations, budget documents,
orders. and a variety of othertypes
make their way into the collection.
Part or all of 32 different histories written for in-house planning purposes by various DOD agencies
are also included, and while many of these histories are less than analytical and sometimes are quite
pedestrian
they provide a guide to the subject that can be mined with profit by later researchers.
This author has some criticisms of the Grlirlr rrr~tl f/~tlc.~-and the microfiche document collection
itself. Before raising them. however,
it is only fair to state that the comments to follow are subject
to two limiting factors (or LIMFACs as the DOD commonly calls them), and readers should weigh
criticisms in light of them. First, this reviewer received from the publisher a copy of the zyxwvutsrqponm
G uic lc cu7tl
Iml~~.u
and I3 representative
microfiche to get a flavor of the documentary
record. Consequently,
the following remarks are not based on an exhaustive look at every microfiche. Second, since many
of the hard copy documents
are not available in their entirety, largely because of excisions
made
in the declassification
process.
the reviewer
was unable to check many of them against those
published in the microfiche set.
Having registered these caveats, this author is dismayed at some of the editorial decisions in this
effort. One example, relating to NASA. should suffice to illustrate the concern.
Document
00339
in the microfiche
collection
is listed as NASA Qfficr~ of Dyfhnsc ,4ffirim:The First Five Ywrs by
W. Fred Boone. It was published in December
1970, and the catalog indicates that it is a 36-page
report of unknown classification.
In actuality, the work is a 333-page historical study that has been
unclassified
and open to the public since it was first issued as a publication by the NASA History
Division in 1970. A check ofthe document on the microfiche reveals that only 36 pages are included,
but there is no indication anywhere of the more expansive nature of the study. After cover and title
pages to the document,
there are runs of these pages: 83-103, 201, 233, 749-53, 263-64. 276-77,
and 282-83 interspersed
with sheets that read PAGE NOT AVAILABLE.
Additionally,
some of
the pages are poorly reproduced
and contain a notation at the bottom indicating that the editors
have reproduced
the best available copy. There are several troubling aspects here. The guide does
not accurately reflect the true size. extent, and classification
of the actual document.
The researcher
is not well served by an incomplete and poorly reproduced copy of what is included on the microfiche,
especially when the entire report has been and continues to be readily available in the NASA History
Division and several other research institutions.
Clearly, better copies could have been included
without undue effort. The entire document should have been reproduced
here or at least an indication
should have been made in the guide that what is included is part of a much larger study and a note
where that larger study is accessible
to researchers.
There is no excuse whatsoever
for including
poor copies or for indicating that pages were not available on the microfiche.
The problems with
this document
raise questions
in my mind about \ome of the others as well.
A less specific criticism. and one that any documentary
editor must face. relates to what is included
and what is excluded.
Individuals
may differ over these choices. but in this reviewer’s
estimation.
there are included various somewhat esoteric documents,
or those that can be found easily elsewhere,
For instance.
the Boone study. since it is
while others, especially
important
ones. are omitted.
unclassified
and available in printed form, could have been omitted altogether.
On the other hand,
the editors included a single 1964 letter discussing the efforts of Hugh Dryden, the NASA Deputy
Administrator,
and Soviet Academician
A.A. Blagonravov
to work toward U.S./U.S.S.R.
cooperation in space. These exchanges
took place over several years-and
there are several other letters,
memoranda,
and reports in the NASA History Division dealing with them-that
are probably equally
deserving of inclusion.
Having raised these concerns. this documentary
effort is nonetheless
useful even though it carries
a heavy price tag and may be outside the reach of many libraries and research institutions.
The
paper copies of these documents
are available at the National Security Archive in Washington,
D.C.. and now that they have all been declassified,
at least in part, they are available from the
document
collections
and research institutions
of the various originating agencies.
For instance.
many of the documents
contained in this collection. as well as zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWV
m a ny more not included,
are available
for research in the USAF Historical Research Agency at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, and
the Air Force Historical Agency in Washington,
D.C. Others can be found in the collections
of the
Reviews
363
National Archives and the various presidential
libraries. Those collections may prove more satisfying
to serious researchers
than this microfiche.
For beginners,
and even for intermediate
students U.S.
Military Uses of Space, 1945-1991 will be a valuable collection.
National
Aeronautics
ROGER D. LAUNIUS
NASA Chief Historian
Office of the Administrator
and Space Administration
Washington,
DC 20546
USA
Directory of United Nations Documentary and Archival Sources. Compiled with Annotations
and
an introduction
by Peter I. Hajnal. (Reports
and papers, the Academic
Council on the United
Nations System,
1991-I). Copublished
by the Academic
Council on the United Nations System,
Kraus International
Publications,
and the United Nations,
1991. ISBN 92-1-100455-I (United Nations): ISBN o-527-37321-4 (Kraus International
Publications)
LC91-61735. UN Sales no. 91 .I. 14.
$12.50
Since 1987 the Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS) has worked through
its Committee
on Documents
and Archives to make United Nations documentation
more accessible
and usable for scholars and practitioners.
As part of its efforts they commissioned
Peter Hajnal, a
well-known
international
documents
specialist, to prepare this directory.
The directory is designed
to provide information
for those studying the United Nations’ activities-what
documentary
collections and sources are available, what the collections
contain, and where they are located. Hajnal
has annotated
over 500 entries for materials originating within the United Nations System as well
as items of reference
and informational
value produced by commercial,
academic,
or government
publishers.
What is the distinction
which the United Nations makes between a “document”
and a “publication”? What are the implications
for locating each? Hajnal’s introduction
describes in some detail
the pattern of publishing within the UN system, the organizational
relationship
between the United
Nations and its affiliated agencies, and the volume, subject matter, and physical form of the documentation. The distinction
between document
and publication
is discussed,
and the various levels of
distribution-general,
limited, and restricted-are
explained. The system of depository
libraries for
the United Nations and its specialized
agencies is described.
Although scholars are directed to a
source that lists the depository
libraries, including such a list in this directory would have enhanced
its usefulness.
The introduction
also discusses the major bibliographic
tools, which facilitate bibliographic
control
and research. Hajnal concludes the introduction
by identifying some trends in international
intergovernmental
organization
(IGO) publishing.
A program, which at least one United Nations agency
adopted in 1991, was not mentioned
as a trend, perhaps in hopes that it would not become one;
i.e., the United Nations Industrial
Development
Organization
(UNIDO) imposing an additional
charge for receipt of UNIDO documentation.
The body of the directory is divided into two parts; entries are organized by subject in the first
part and in the second part by research
resources.
The subject divisions include structural
and
institutional
issues: peace, security,
disarmament,
and arms control; economic and social issues;
international
law; human rights; environment;
and other topics and general information.
The research
resources
section is subdivided
into collections
of documents;
statistics;
archival resources;
and
catalogs, indexes, guides, and other bibliographic
tools. Within each section, entries are arranged
alphabetically
by personal or corporate
author. The latest publication date for the entries included
was 1991.
The “structural
and institutional
issues” section includes sources such as annual reports, basic
agreements,
constitutions,
official records and histories published by and about the United Nations
system. Consequently,
this section constitutes
over 25 percent of the total number of entries. The
primary bibliographies,
catalogs of publications,
and indexes produced
by each of the agencies
within the United Nations system as well as those compiled and published commercially
are listed
in the “catalogs,
indexes,
guides, and other bibliographic
tools” section, which constitutes
the
largest portion of the listings in part two, research resources.