Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and
Spaces Among the Ancient Maya
Elisa Perego
UCL Institute of Archaeology
Feminist archaeology has prompted scholars to reconsider gender roles in ancient Mesoamerica.
Current research, however, tends to focus on elite women, classes and sites. Although I do not
ignore the potential of these sources, in this paper I am mainly concerned with issues such as
the phenomenology of bodies and spaces, subroyal ritual actions, and daily activities such as
cooking and weaving. My aim is to offer an overview of the most recent studies on gender
in Maya archaeology and to provide ideas for further research by emphasising the need to
engender ritual and individuate female discourses in the archaeological record.
Keywords
Bodies, gender, Maya, sexuality, spaces
Introduction
During the last few decades, the rise of feminist archaeology (Conkey and Gero 1997;
Conkey and Spector 1984; Gero and Conkey 1991) has promoted a new sensibility
toward themes such as gender, agency, sexuality and the construction of selfhood in antiquity. Studies of the role of women in ancient Mesoamerica have recently increased
(e.g. Ardren 2002a; Joyce 2000a; Klein 2001). The aim of this paper is to offer an
overview of research on gender in Maya archaeology and to highlight the impact that
Maya studies might have on the development of gender theory. My primary concern
is not for those areas usually studied by Mayanists: royal architecture, elite burials and
hieroglyphic texts. On the contrary, I focus on issues such as the management of the
household, the perception of the body and the way in which living spaces were conceived and exploited. My emphasis is on studies which explore how male ideology has
concealed women’s real position in Maya society. In particular, I note that ideological
constructions of body and sexuality were primary means of male domination. I also
suggest, however, that a greater focus on female activities such as food processing and
weaving can provide valuable information on macro-scale social dynamics, and that
further research is needed to identify symbolic and physical ‘spaces’ in which Maya
women were allowed to raise - metaphorically - their voices.
Preliminary Methodological Observations: The Sources
Hill (1998), among others, notes that mere hypotheses concerning gender roles in the past
have been taken for granted on the basis of ethnographic analogy. She suggests that only
a “multivariate approach” based on several lines of evidence may allow archaeologists to
avoid the pitfalls which emerge when a single source is employed. I argue that the exceptional richness of the Maya record offers unique opportunities to employ gender theory
to investigate both women’s conditions in antiquity and macro-scale phenomena such as
politics and conflict. Before tackling these issues in the following sections, I offer a critical assessment of the evidence through which Maya gender dynamics are revealed.
Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 18 (2007): 70-83
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
71
Ethnographic and ethnohistorical comparisons can be carefully employed to produce
hypotheses subject to testing. General ethnography offers a basic framework to identify gender roles and relations, but fails to take into account the specificity of the context under study. Ethnographic studies on modern Maya provide valuable information
and when compared with other lines of evidence, reveal a partial cultural continuity
between the past and the present (Joyce 1992: 255). However, Mesoamerican ways of
life underwent dramatic changes over time, particularly after European contact. The
information provided by the Spaniards must be considered with caution because such
information was compromised by religious and cultural biases (Hill 1998: 106-109).
Similarly, the hieroglyphic manuscripts painted during the Postclassic period (AD 9001500) and the accounts written by native individuals after the Conquest do not offer an
objective view of local gender dynamics, since they were probably produced by men
(Vail and Stone 2002: 203). Similar considerations can be made for Classic Maya written sources (AD 250-900). Although hieroglyphic texts supply exceptional information on political and historical events, writing was a medium employed by elite males
to sustain their systems of power.
Iconographic evidence is another important means of understanding gender roles,
ideologies and identities. Interpretations based on iconography, however, can be undermined by two main weaknesses. First, they sometimes rely exceedingly on the
scholar’s viewpoint. This is the case, for instance, of Upper Paleolithic female figurines, variously interpreted as sex-toys produced by men for a male audience, symbols
of fertility, religious implements, or female forms of self-representation (McDermott
1996: 233-234). Second, iconography is a medium which retains a strong ideological
load and does not offer a neutral view of the social reality. Maya people were depicted
on/through three main artistic media: public monuments such as stelae, painted vessels
and clay figurines.
Evidence suggests that the artefact’s meaning changed according to the producer, the
audience and the message conveyed (Joyce 1993: 261-263). Both stelae and painted
ceramics were employed by the elites to reinforce their pre-eminent status. We know
from the signatures on some works that scribes and artists were generally males, and
possibly members of the elite themselves (Inomata 2001: 325). However, whereas
stone monuments were more directly related to the royal elite, as testified by the presence of royal names on them, vessels had a wider audience, may have escaped centralised production and were possibly used by non-ruling elites to negotiate their social
position (Joyce 1993: 261). This dichotomy between monumental art and ceramics is
crucial, since, as I discuss later, the gender identities represented on vessels do not completely overlap with those elaborated on stelae. Compared to other media, figurines
show more concern for women’s labour. Since there is no clear evidence concerning
the artisan’s identity, it is possible that women made figurines. This hypothesis has
been discussed by Gustafson (2002a: 66-71), who suggests that female figurines may
have been evidence of women’s agency and spirituality. However, as Cohodas (2002:
43) points out, even female artists may have worked within a framework of socially
accepted, male-focused ideological codes. Figurines, therefore, might reveal androcentric views shared by both men and women.
72
Elisa Perego
In Mesoamerica, space was a medium subject to intense ideological manipulation.
Spatial analysis can be considered a viable means to investigate local gender ideologies, but it is open to question whether it can serve as the basis for inferring real social
dynamics. Moreover, spaces such as houses, rooms and sanctuaries are rarely attributable to one or the other gender, unless we rely on evidence (e.g. iconography), which
could lead to the pitfalls I have already pointed out. Maya mortuary evidence supplies
abundant information on local religious beliefs and people’s status, gender and wealth.
However, as postprocessual and ethnographic studies have demonstrated, the treatment
reserved for the dead individual does not necessarily reflect his/her social condition in
life (Hodder 1986; Ucko 1969: 265-269). Forms of ideological elaboration of the deceased’s identity were common in Mesoamerica. Gender roles and relations, therefore,
may have been constructed through the manipulation of the funerary ritual. Osteological analysis offers significant insights into several aspects of ancient lifestyle (e.g. diet,
division of labour and health). Nonetheless, the information provided must be carefully
evaluated. For example, Cucina and Tiesler (2003) note that at some Mexican sites, the
evidence suggests that elite women were more subject to caries than elite males. This
pattern, however, may have been caused by different factors, such as minor consumption of meat by women or their more frequent consumption of carbohydrates, or both.
In conclusion, although every line of evidence has its weaknesses, the employment of
several of them at the same time should reduce the risk of producing an a priori construction of the past. For example, the quasi-universal assumption that women are in
charge of food and textile production seems confirmed for the Maya by ethnographic,
ethnohistorical (Vail and Stone 2002: 218), archaeological (Joyce 1992, 1993) (Fig.
1) and osteological analysis (Wanner et al. 2007). It is probable, therefore, that Maya
women were indeed involved in such activities.
Figure 1. Woman grinding maize on vessel K631 (Source: Houston
et al. 2006: 111. Courtesy of the University of Texas Press and
the authors).
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
73
The Data
Actions
Ethnographic, archaeological and osteological evidence for the Maya suggests the existence of a sexual division of labour. Men engaged in warfare, hunting, out-field farming and long-distance trade. Women raised children and animals, cultivated the house
garden, processed food and produced textiles (Ardren 2002b: 75-81; Joyce 1992, 1993:
261; Neff 2002; Wanner et al. 2007). Recent research suggests that women were possibly involved in farming (Neff 2002: 37-38; Robin 2006). Osteological analysis of
groups living in Northern Belize shows that women performed heavy physical work
(Saul & Prufer 2005: 311-312). It is unclear if activities such as pottery-making were
gender-related. Royalty was generally a man’s matter, although women played a significant role in cementing alliances and transmitting royal blood and, rarely, held power
on their own (Hewitt 1999; Josserand 2002; Marcus 2001: 324-330). Female involvement in ritual activities is revealed by ethnographic accounts and iconography (Hendon
2004: 313-318; Josserand 2002: 127-139).
Hendon (1996, 1997: 44-45) highlights the economic importance of cloth and food production. The McCaffertys’ (1994, 1996) works on textile production in Mesoamerica
suggest that spinning and weaving acted as metaphors of female identity. The connection of these activities with goddesses involved in childbirth, sexuality and healing symbolised the power women were able to gain in the few sectors open to their
agency: reproduction and household technologies. At Ceren, El Salvador, the presence
of spindle whorls and artefacts for the processing of different fibres (maguey and cotton), and their peculiar patterns of distribution reveal that women had probably set up
a textile workshop. The subdivision of different tasks among different households and
the complexity of the labour organisation suggest that the artisans were producing for a
market beyond the family needs (Beaudry-Corbett and McCafferty 2002).
Food processing, associated with women, is an activity often devalued both by archaeologists and within numerous societies (Brumfiel 1992). Food, however, is a powerful
means of negotiation at different levels, both between political entities and between
genders (Appadurai 1981; Brumfiel 1987, 1991; Hastorf 1991, 2003). A careful evaluation of food processing activities, tools and facilities reveals significant social and
symbolic dynamics. At Formative K’axob (c. 800 BC-AD 250), Belize, several sherdlined pits were probably used for cooking (Bobo 2004). The placement of the pits
inside or outside the house provides information on the conceptualisation of domestic
space; their common location in the courtyard suggests communal and perhaps ritual
preparation of food. It also implies that the cooks were not confined to the home and
could have contacts with other people. Moreover, the deposition of human remains and
offerings inside the pits indicates that there was not a rigid division between sacred/ritualised areas and domestic spaces.
Spaces
Space is the medium through which people substantiate their being-in-the-world (Robin
2002b: 248; Tilley 1994: 7-34). It is also a means to negotiate relations between different social entities and between genders (Hill 1998: 116-117; Hodder 1990). The spatial
74
Elisa Perego
arrangement is often a way to control women. Numerous forms of female confinement
have been elaborated throughout history: segregation at home, segregation in religious
buildings or seclusion within limited spaces during menstruation and childbirth (Galloway 1997; Gilchrist 1996). Women, however, are able to create symbolically marked
spaces on their own. In his studies on the African Ilchamus, Hodder (1991) suggests
that the symbolic decoration made by women on the walls of the hut is a way to assert
female power in the domestic sphere.
In Mesoamerica, space was imbued with symbolic meanings referring to local cosmological beliefs (Mathews and Garber 2004). Space was also a powerful means of
ideological negotiation. The rulers promoted the creation of space patterns symbolically marked, and manipulated the ways in which these elaborations were “consumed”
by the audience (Sanchez 2005). Architecture – for example the presence of buildings
that varied in height and were arranged on different levels – and iconography provided
a clear sense of hierarchy which people would have begun to internalise in their childhood (Meskell and Joyce 2003: 51-53). At Calakmul, Mexico, the distribution of tools
and prestige goods on Structure II reveals that artisans worked on the terraces at the
base of the pyramid, while the members of the aristocracy lived in the higher court,
over them. This spatial arrangement seems to have marked the elites’ authority over
the commoners and their right to exploit the production of the entire social body (Robin
2004: 155-156).
Space was also a gendered medium. Joyce (2000a: 74) notes that on public monuments
such as stelae women were less frequently represented than men and rarely appeared
without a male companion. When men and women were depicted together, their disposition on the monument’s surface would have revealed a dichotomy between male and
female. On stelae placed at the end of a plaza, women tended to appear on the back of
the monument, whereas men were generally represented on the front, facing the open
space. Otherwise, women could be depicted standing at ground level, with men placed
over them, in elevated positions (Joyce 2000a: 74-75).
Gender ideology and cosmological symbolism permeated symbolically charged spaces
such as sweatbaths. Sweatbathing has been practised throughout Mesoamerica since
the Preclassic period. Women in childbirth and after menstruation were and are taken
to sweatbaths, which are characterised by dark, narrow and womblike spaces. A pervasive symbolism links the sweatbath with sexuality, reproduction and caves, all elements
emphasised in Maya ritual. Ethnography shows that today sweatbathing is a practice
described by both men and women through hilarious stories about sex and references
to the female body (Moyes 2005: 187-191). Although it is risky to extend contemporaneous accounts to past ages, it is possible that this practice was a locus of gender
negotiation also among the ancient Maya. On Late Classic vessels (AD 600-900), orgiastic scenes involving old deities attended by young women took place in sweatbaths
(Houston 1996: 142; Houston et al. 2006: 197). Houston (1996) suggests that the inner
sanctuaries erected in the Cross Group temples at Palenque were perceived as symbolic
sweatbaths where the local gods’ births were celebrated under the auspices of the ruler.
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
75
Research is needed to delineate the role of male rulers as promoters of re-birth and fertility and to understand the meaning of the association between young women and old
men in sexualised contexts.
Archaeologists also identify more mundane gendered spaces. In the subroyal residences of Copan, two different kinds of buildings have been discovered. The first kind
is elaborate, has traces of ritual activities and contains men’s burials; it was probably a
male residence. The second one is smaller and less ornate, and contains female equipment, cooking areas and women’s tombs. Cohodas (2002: 33-35) considers these data
evidence for women’s lower status. The existence of houses in which men lived together until their marriage was documented by the Spaniards. Joyce (2000b: 267-269)
recognises these specialised palaces in buildings discovered at several Maya sites (e.g.
Chichèn Itzà and Uxmal). These residences are characterised by the presence of giant
phalli and mural paintings representing aristocratic male activities such as ball-playing,
dancing, hunting and warfare. This form of seclusion may have been aimed at promoting male solidarity, male gender identity and homosexuality (Meskell and Joyce 2003:
125-126).
Less hierarchical arrangements probably characterised minor settlements. In her study
of the agricultural system at Chan Nòohol, Belize, Robin (2002a, 2002b, 2004: 160-4,
2006: 416-418) highlights that neither the distribution of the artefacts inside the dwellings, nor the spatial organisation of the site indicates a sexual division of labour. On the
contrary, the openness of the pole-walled buildings and the location of the fields near
the village would have permitted a great interaction among individuals and women’s
involvement in farming.
Bodies
The body is the primary means humans posses to interact with the world and to create
relationships between individuals (Fisher and Loren 2003; Joyce 2005). Placed on
the body, ornaments and clothes become a second skin which mediates the relation
between the person and the external world, whilst instruments expand human agency
beyond the range of the limbs (Knappett 2006: 241-242). Dress codes are an expression of the numerous axes of the individual’s identity: gender, age, economic level and
origin (Blum Schevill et al. 1996; Wobst 1977).
The Maya devoted enormous attention to their bodies and their ornamentation. Physical modifications were common: skulls were elongated during childhood; earlobes were
enlarged and pierced; noses were adorned with jewels; teeth were modified. Skin was
tattooed and hair adorned with complex headdresses. The dead had their faces covered
with masks, or their skulls removed and substituted by masks (Meskell and Joyce 2003:
33-43; Tiesler 1999; Williams and White 2006). To describe this pervasive phenomenon, Joyce (2000a: 13) adopts the concept of “beautification”: the necessity to become
attractive to gain social recognition.
76
Elisa Perego
In Mesoamerica the construction of the symbolic body (i.e. the body socially controlled
and elaborated) was gender related. The creation of ‘docile’ personalities may have
started with the direct manipulation of the physical body. Although the pattern is not
general, there is evidence that men enjoyed better nutrition (Ardren, 2002b: 74-75;
Cucina and Tiesler 2003: 6; Danforth 1997: 135). As Ardren (2002b: 75) notes, the
consequences of this social behaviour were not only physical, but also psychological;
since their childhood, girls would have internalised female inferiority through repeated
negations of their nutritional needs. It is unclear to what extent body modifications were
gendered. At Yaxuna, Mexico, cranial shaping was more common for girls, whereas
dental modification, reflecting the exploitation of prestige goods (e.g. incrustation with
haematite), was often a male prerogative (Ardren 2002b: 74). Conversely, in her analysis of 1515 skeletons from Honduras, Mexico and Guatemala, Tiesler (1999: 3, 5) does
not observe significant differences between sexes, although she notes that dental modification was slightly more common for women. In both cases (nutrition and physical
modification) further research is needed to understand why different gendered practices
were adopted at different sites, and in social strata and historical phases.
Iconographic studies reveal interesting patterns. The women represented on public monuments are almost completely covered by ornaments, feathers and elaborate
clothes. The representations of their bodies do not depict breasts or other sexual characteristics. Conversely, men’s bodies are partially naked and, in Joyce’s (2002: 337,
2000b; 264) opinion, highly sexualised and metaphorically offered to the gaze of both
female and male spectators. A different treatment of the female body can be detected
on ceramic vessels and figurines. Here women are clearly recognisable by the presence
of breasts and their bodies are generally less covered (Joyce 1992, 1993, 2000a: 6871) (Figs. 1-2). However, painted vessels and figurines do not reveal the same female
identities. On ceramics, women appear generally involved in ritual, court scenes and
sexual acts with deities and animals (Fig. 2), rarely in productive activities, whereas
the focus of figurines is on female labour and reproduction. According to Joyce (1993:
261-263), these different elaborations of women’s identities depended on the medium’s
meaning and audience. Stone monuments, on which royal women are depicted while
offering food and textiles to men, would have emphasised the rulers’ right to exploit the
production of lesser individuals. Figurines and vessels found in non-ruling households
may have signalled the commoners’ attempts to emphasise their roles as producers. If
women made figurines, the attention paid to motherhood and female labour might have
been a means to gain social recognition.
The symbolic construction of the body thus had political and economic implications.
The products of women’s work, food and textiles, were fundamental to maintain the
household, to carry out rituals and to sustain men’s claims in the political arena (Hendon 1997: 44-45; Joyce 1992: 66, 1993). The desire of the household elders to control
women’s production, and the will of the royal elites to exploit the households may
have created tensions crystallised in the construction of the socially-shaped body. Living and dead bodies became loci of negotiation between ruling-inferior classes and
between genders. According to Joyce (1993, 2000a: 88-89, 2001: 115), the increasing
emphasis on ornamentation and heterosexual differentiation would be the evidence of
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
77
the control which elites and states tried to impose over single households and individuals in order to exploit their production. Sexual control was one of the principal means
to achieve power. In the sacred Maya book, The Popol Vuh, the dead god tries to kill
his daughter when he discovers her illicit pregnancy (Christenson 2003: 131). In Maya
imagery, representations of sexual domination are not rare. Captives are often shown
in an aroused state or in sexualised contexts, and a stela from Toninà probably portrays
a publicly sanctioned rape (Houston 2001: 213). Sexual degradation may have been a
means to achieve control over enemies (Houston et al. 2006: 207-219).
Figure 2. Painted ceramics depicting cross-species lovemaking (Source: Houston et al.
2006: 195. Courtesy of the University of Texas Press and the authors)
More ambiguous are those vessels presenting women with enormous breasts touched
by elderly gods or by animals, or women copulating with monkeys and insects (Houston 2001: 212; Meskell and Joyce 2003: 127) (Fig. 2). Although these ceramics may
have had a religious meaning, the fact that women were involved in sexual activities
with animals and with males not conforming to proper codes of decorum may be significant in terms of how female sexuality was conceived, and would require further
elaboration.
78
Elisa Perego
Evidence suggests that women’s bodies may have been the focus of men’s attempts to
subsume female prerogatives such as the power of fertility. The ideological exploitation
of the feminine principle was crucial to justify male royalty (Gustafson 2002b: 141). It
has been hypothesised that rulers wore elements of the female costume to incorporate
every nuance of local gender identities (Joyce 1992: 68; see however Houston et al.
2006: 52). The emphasis given to royal male reproduction was shown by the symbolism concerning male activities such as the scaffold sacrifice, which were supposed to
enhance fertility (Taube 1988: 350-351). Female reproductive acts such as breastfeeding, childbirth and pregnancy were not revealed on public monuments (Meskell &
Joyce 2003: 44), although the roles of women as mothers were indeed emphasised by
the inscriptions which accompanied the queens portrayed with their offspring. Since
public monuments were erected by male rulers to strengthen their power, this elaboration of motherhood seems a political construction aimed at reasserting the purity of the
king’s lineage and his entitlement to reign (cf. Marcus 2001: 330; Sanchez 2005: 269),
possibly de-emphasising at the same time women’s direct control over reproduction.
The lack of sexual attributes of women’s royal bodies has its counterpart in Tomb 2
at Yaxuna, where a defeated and sacrificed royal family was buried (Ardren 2002b:
81-87). Here women’s royal power appears sexualised and contextualised – but with
tragic consequences. One princess was killed not long before giving birth; the other,
probably the dynastic heir, had her lower limbs defleshed and was buried with a “La
Muneca” figurine, possibly a symbol of sexual appropriation. This emphasis seems
to reveal an effort to ‘tame’ female attempts to gain direct power by ‘hurting’ them in
their femininity.
Suggestions for Further Research
Further research must be dedicated to engendering ritual practices and symbolism. We
can consider, for example, an ancient Maya and pre-Maya symbol, the cross, a representation of the world and a symbol of power (Headrick 2004: 370-377). At Formative
K’axob, the use of bowls decorated with the cross motif seems reserved for male burials (Headrick 2004: 368-369; McAnany 2004: 416). The exploitation of such symbolism has been read as the attempt by a kin group to gain power in the village (Headrick
2004: 377); the dead were probably male leaders and shamans. Another ritual practice
rarely considered in terms of gender is caching (deposition of offerings in the ground).
However, an evaluation of caching as a gendered action is possible. An example is
offered by the same site of K’axob, where a local cache was composed of four vessels
arranged in a cross pattern. The cross, as noted, was probably a symbol of maleness
and power. Furthermore, the quadripartite cache and three (probably) male burials containing the bowls with the cross design were covered with fragments of golden-yellow
chert bifaces (McAnany 2004a: 416). The bifaces were imported items employed for
agricultural work. Heavy agricultural tasks and long-distance trade were more likely men’s activities. The colour probably referred to ripened maize (McAnany 2004:
417-418); in ancient Mesoamerica, maize was a pervasive symbol linked to centrality,
power, re-birth and prosperity (Taube 2005: 25-30). Male authority, therefore, appears
to have been emphasised through different ‘layers’ of meanings.
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
79
Research is needed to identify female forms of self-expression in the archaeological
record. Although evidence concerning women’s roles in Maya society is not scarce,
many of the sources available were products created by men for a male audience. As a
consequence, even in those cases in which women are revealed, it is difficult to discern
whether we are looking at female discourses and choices or at ideological structures
imposed on women by males (Ashmore 2002: 231). However, forms of resistance
must have existed. Food and textile production might have been the loci of women’s
creative responses to a male-dominated system. Research should focus on the evolution of food-processing strategies and technologies to acknowledge women’s contributions to macro-scale phenomena such as diet modifications and negotiation between
producers and consumers. Textile production was another means women employed to
gain social recognition. According to the McCaffertys (1996), women emphasised the
importance of their work by linking weaving to sexuality and by using spindle whorls
which had been decorated with care. The designs on the spindle whorls would have
made these objects symbolically charged and reveal, now as then, the complexity of the
female imagery (see however Brumfiel 2001, who notes that the spindles were probably produced by artisans). Joyce (1992: 64-65) notes the symbolic and cosmological
meaning of the decoration of the clothes depicted on public monuments. Trevelyan
and Forbes (2002: 98) suggest that the unusual architectural decoration of Late Terminal Classic Uxmal (c. AD 680-900), Yucatan, reproduced textile-based designs. Since
women produced clothes, it is possible that cloth decoration - perhaps through hidden
allusions - conveyed a female-oriented ideology. Although men may have certainly
tried to exploit women’s work and perhaps compelled women to adopt specific artistic codes, further research may enlighten women’s contributions in promoting the
creation, manipulation and diffusion of religious and political symbolism through the
production of textiles.
Conclusions
In this article I offer an overview of recent attempts to deal with gender issues in Maya
archaeology. The works discussed provide examples of the potential that gender studies have in furthering the development of Mesoamerican archaeology. The materials
offered by the Maya record provide gender archaeology with a rich dataset that can be
used to refine theory and methodology; in turn, a stronger focus on gender dynamics
would foster a more holistic understanding of Mesoamerican ancient societies. I hope
that my focus on gender and micro-scale phenomena such as caching, weaving and
spatial organisation will prove useful in addressing wider issues concerning economy,
politics and conflict. Taking into account the weaknesses inherent in the available
sources, I argue that the employment of multiple lines of evidence can offer significant
insights into Maya gender dynamics. The manipulation of the body, the ideological
construction of iconographies and spaces, and the control of (re)productive actions
were the loci in which forms of gender negotiation were played out. The physical
and symbolic exploitation of women may have been one of the means through which
men achieved control over the economic and political system. However, women’s
importance in Maya society cannot be underestimated. We have evidence that women
worked, worshipped, became rulers and contributed to the formation of the archaeological record. A fresher focus on often downplayed female activities such as food and
80
Elisa Perego
textile production can further expand our knowledge of women’s roles in promoting
social change and elaborating ideology and symbolism. Although in ancient Mesoamerica men’s control over the communicative media was strong, research is needed to
allow Maya women to raise their voices – are archaeologists willing to listen?
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge Dr Jim Aimers, who encouraged me to write this article at
the beginning. I also want to thank Dr Elizabeth Graham and anonymous referees for
the useful comments which helped me to greatly improve the first draft of this paper.
Obviously, I take responsibility for any remaining mistakes. A special mention to the
Rotary Foundation of the Rotary International whose Scholarship Programme provided funds for my first year at UCL. Finally, I acknowledge the University of Texas
Press and Peggy Gough for the permission to reproduce Figures 1 and 2.
References
Ardren, T (ed.) 2002a. Ancient Maya Women. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Brumfiel, E. 1992. Distinguished Lecture in Archaeology: Breaking and Entering the
Ecosystem-Gender, Class, and Faction
Steal the Show. American Anthropologist 94(3), 551-567.
Ardren, T. 2002b. Death Became Her: Images of
Female Power from Yaxuna Burials, in
Ardren, T. (ed.), 68-88.
Brumfiel, E. 2001. Asking about Aztec Gender: The
Historical and Archaeological Evidence, in Klein, C. (ed.), 57-85.
Ashmore, W. 2002. Encountering Maya Women, in
Ardren, T. (ed.), 229-245.
Christenson, A. J. 2003. Popol Vuh. The Sacred Book
of the Maya. Winchester: O Books.
Beaudry-Corbett, M. and McCafferty, S. 2002. Spindle Whorls: Household Specialisation
at Ceren, in Ardren, T. (ed.), 52-67.
Claassen, C. and Joyce, R. (eds.) 1997. Women in
Prehistory: North America and Central America. Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press.
Appadurai, A. 1981. Gastro-Politics in Hindu South
Asia. American Ethnology 8, 494-511.
Blum Schevill, M., Berlo J. C. and Dwyer, E. B.
(eds.) 1996. Textile Traditions of Mesoamerica and the Andes. An Anthology.
Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bobo, V. L. 2004. Soaked and Steamed Sustenance:
Evidence from Sherd-Lined Pits, in
McAnany (ed.), 87-104.
Brumfiel, E. 1987. Consumption and Politics at Aztec Huexotla. American Anthropologist
89(3), 676-686.
Brumfiel, E. 1991. Weaving and Cooking: Women’s
Production in Aztec Mexico, in Gero,
J. M. and Conkey, M. W. (eds.), 224251.
Cohodas, M. 2002. Multiplicity and Discourse in
Maya Gender Relations, in Gustafson,
L. S. and Trevelyan, A. M. (eds.), 1153.
Conkey, M. W. and Gero, J. M. 1997. Programme
to Practice: Gender and Feminism in
Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 26, 411-437.
Conkey, M. W. and Spector, J. 1984. Archaeology
and the Study of Gender. Archaeological Method and Theory 7, 1-38.
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
81
Cucina, A. and Tiesler, V. 2003. Dental Caries and
Antemortem Tooth Loss in the Northern Petén Area, Mexico: A Biocultural
Perspective on Social Status Differences among the Classic Maya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology
122(1), 1-10.
Hastorf, C. 2003. Andean Luxury Food: Special
Food for the Ancestors, Deities and the
Elite. Antiquity 77, 545-554.
Danforth, M. E. 1997. Late Classic Maya Health
Patterns: Evidence from Enamel Microdefects, in Whittington, S. L. and
Reed, D. M. (eds.) Bones of the Maya.
Studies of Ancient Skeletons. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press,
127-137.
Hendon, J. A. 1996. Archaeological Approaches to
the Organisation of Domestic Labor:
Household Practice and Domestic Relations. Annual Review of Anthropology 25, 45-61.
Fisher, G. and Loren, D. 2003. Embodying Identity
in Archaeology. Introduction. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13(2),
225-230.
Headrick, A. 2004. The Quadripartite Motif and the
Centralisation of Power, in McAnany
(ed.), 367-378.
Hendon, J A. 1997. Women’s Work, Women’s Space,
and Women’s Status among the Classic-Period Maya Elite of the Copan
Valley, Honduras, in Claassen, C. and
Joyce, R. A. (eds.), 33-46.
Galloway, P. 1997. Where Have All the Menstrual
Huts Gone? The Invisibility of Menstrual Seclusion in the Late Prehistoric
Southeast, in Claassen, C. and Joyce,
R. (eds.), 47-62.
Hendon, J. A. 2004. Postclassic and Colonial Period Sources on Maya Society and History, in Hendon, J.
A. and Joyce, R. A. (eds.), Mesoamerican Archaeology. Theory and
Practice. Oxford: Blackwell296-322.
Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M. W. (eds.) 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hewitt, E A. 1999. What’s in a Name. Gender, Power, and Classic Maya Women Rulers.
Ancient Mesoamerica 10, 251-262.
Gilchrist, R. 1996. Virgin Territory. Gender Archaeology and Medieval Religious Women.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
7(1), 120-136.
Hill, E. 1998. Gender-Informed Archaeology: the
Priority of Definition, the Use of Analogy, and the Multivariate Approach.
Journal of Archaeological Method and
Theory 5, 99-128.
Gustafson, L. S. 2002a. Shared Gender Relations:
Early Mesoamerica and the Maya, in
Gustafson, L. S. and Trevelyan A. M.
(eds.), 55-74.
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Gustafson, L. S. 2002b. Mother/Father Kings, in
Gustafson, L. S. and Trevelyan, A. M.
(eds.), 141-168.
Gustafson, L. S. and Trevelyan, A. M. (eds.) 2002.
Ancient Maya Gender Identity and Relations. London: Bergin and Garvey.
Hastorf, C. 1991. Gender, Space, and Food in Prehistory, in Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M.
W. (eds.), 132-155.
Hodder, I. 1990. The Domestication of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodder, I. 1991. The Decoration of Containers: an
Ethnographic and Historical Study, in
Longacre W. A. (ed.) Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: University of
Arizona Press, 71-94.
Houston, S. D. 1996. Symbolic Sweatbath of the
Maya: Architectural Meaning in the
Cross Group at Palenque, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 7(2), 132-151
82
Houston, S. D. 2001. Decorous Bodies and Disordered Passions: Representations of
Emotions among the Classic Maya.
World Archaeology 33(2) 206-219.
Houston, S. D., Stuart, D. and Taube, K. 2006. The
Memory of Bones: Body, Being, and
Experience among the Classic Maya.
Austin: University of Texas Press.
Inomata, T. 2001. The Power and Ideology of Artistic Creation. Elite Craft Specialists in
Classic Maya Society. Current Anthropology 42(3), 321-349.
Joyce, R. A. 1992. Images of Gender and Labor Organisation in Classic Maya Society, in
Claassen, C. (ed.) Exploring Gender
through Archaeology: Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference.
Monographs in World Archaeology, no.
11. Madison: Prehistory Press, 63-70.
Joyce, R. A. 1993. Women’s Work: Images of Production and Reproduction in Pre-Hispanic Southern Central America. Current Anthropology 34(3), 255-274.
Joyce, R. A. 2000a. Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Joyce, R. A. 2000b. A Precolumbian Gaze: Male
Sexuality among the Ancient Maya,
in Voss, B. and Schmidt, R. (eds.)
Archaeologies of Sexuality. London:
Routledge, 263-283.
Joyce, R. A. 2001. Negotiating Sex and Gender in
Classic Maya Society, in Klein, C.
(ed.), 109-141.
Joyce, R. A. 2002. Desiring Women: Classic Maya
Sexualities, in Gustafson, L. S. and
Trevelyan, A. M. (eds.), 329-344.
Joyce, R. A. 2004. Mesoamerica: A Working
Model for Archaeology, in Hendon,
J. A. and Joyce, R. A. (eds.), Mesoamerican Archaeology. Theory and
Practice. Oxford: Blackwell, 1-42.
Joyce, R. A. 2005. The Archaeology of the Body.
Annual Review of Anthropology 34,
138-158.
Elisa Perego
Josserand, J. K. 2002. Women in Classic Maya Hieroglyphic Texts, in Ardren, T. (ed.),
114-151.
Klein, C. (ed.) 2001. Gender in Pre-Hispanic America. Washington: Dumbarton Oaks.
Knappet, C. 2006. Beyond Skin: Layering and Networking in Art and Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16(2),
239-251.
Marcus, J. 2001. Breaking the Glass Ceiling: The
Strategies of Royal Women in Ancient
States, in Klein, C. (ed.), 305-340.
Mathews, J. P and Garber, J. F. 2004. Models of Cosmic Order. Physical Expression of Sacred Space among the Ancient Maya.
Ancient Mesoamerica 15, 49-59.
McAnany, P. A. 2004a. Denouement, in McAnany
(ed.), 415-419.
McAnany, P. (ed.) 2004b. K’axob: Ritual, Work,
and Family in an Ancient Maya
Village. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.
McCafferty, S. D. and McCafferty, G. G. 1994. Engendering Tomb 7 at Monte Albàn:
Respinning an Old Yarn. Current Anthropology 35(2), 143-166.
McCafferty, S. D. and McCafferty, G. G. 1996.
Spinning and Weaving as Female Gender Identity in Post-Classic Mexico,
in Blum Schevill, M., Berlo, J. C. and
Dwyer, E. B. (eds.), 19-44.
McDermott, L. 1996. Self-Representation in Upper
Paleolithic Female Figurines. Current
Anthropology 37(2), 227-275.
Meskell, L. and Joyce, R. A. 2003. Embodied Lives.
Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian
Experience. London: Routledge.
Moyes, H. 2005. The Sweatbath in the Cave, in
Prufer, K. M. and Brady, J. E. (eds.)
Stone Houses and Earth Lords. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 187211.
Women’s Voices in a Male World: Actions, Bodies, and Spaces
Among the Ancient Maya
Neff, L. 2002. Gender Divisions of Labor and Lowland Terrace Agriculture, in Ardren, T.
(ed.), 31-51.
Robin, C. 2002a. Gender and Maya Farming: Chan
Nòohol, Belize, in Ardren, T. (ed.), 1230.
Robin, C. 2002b. Outside of Houses: The Practices of Everyday Life at Chan Nòohol,
Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology
2(2), 245-268.
Robin, C. 2004. Social Diversity and Everyday Life
within Classic Maya Settlements, in
Hendon, J.A. and Joyce, R.A. (eds.), Mesoamerican Archaeology. Theory and
Practice. Oxford: Blackwell, 148-168.
Robin, C. 2006. Gender, Farming, and Long-Term
Change: Maya Historical and Archaeological Perspectives. Current Anthropology 47(3), 409-433.
Sanchez, J, 2005. Ancient Maya Royal Strategies.
Creating Power and Identity Through
Art. Ancient Mesoamerica 16, 261275.
Saul Mather, J., Prufer, K. M. and Saul, F. P. 2005.
Nearer to the Gods, in Prufer, K. M.
and Brady, J. E. (eds.) Stone Houses
and Earth Lords. Boulder: University
Press of Colorado, 297-322.
Taube, K. A. 1998. A Study of Classic Maya Scaffold Sacrifice, in Benson, E. P. and
Griffin, G. G. (eds.) Maya Iconography. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 331-351.
Taube, K. A. 2005. The Symbolism of Jade in Classic Maya Religion. Ancient Mesoamerica 16, 23-50.
83
Tiesler, V. 1999. Head Shaping and Dental Decoration among the Ancient Maya. Paper Presented at the 64 Meeting of
the Society of American Archaeology,
Chicago 1999. [http://www.mesoweb.
com/features/tiesler/media/headshaping] [Accessed on 17 October 2007].
Tilley, C. 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape.
Oxford: Berg.
Trevelyan, A. M. and Forbes, H. W. 2002. The
Gendered Architecture of Uxmal, in
Gustafson, L. S. and Trevelyan, A. M.
(eds.), 93-140.
Ucko, P. J. 1969. Ethnography and Archaeological
Interpretation of Funerary Remains.
World Archaeology 1(2), 262-280.
Vail, G. and Stone, A. 2002. Representations of
Women in Postclassic and Colonial
Maya Literature and Art, in Ardren, T.
(ed.), 203-228.
Wanner, I. S., Sierra Sosa, T., Alt, K. W. and Tiesler
Blos, V. 2007. Lifestyle, Occupation
and Whole Bone Morphology of the
Pre-Hispanic Maya Coastal Population
from Xcambò, Yucatan, Mexico. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
17(3), 253-268.
Williams, J. S. and White, C. D. 2006. Dental Modification in the Post-Classic Population
from Lamanai, Belize. Ancient Mesoamerica 17, 139-151.
Wobst, H. M. 1977. Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange, in Cleland, C. (ed.)
For the Director: Research Essays in
Honor of James B Griffin, Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan, Anthropological Papers vol. 61, 317-342.