Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
paper cover icon
Experience with a hospital policy on not offering cardiopulmonary resuscitation when believed more harmful than beneficial

Experience with a hospital policy on not offering cardiopulmonary resuscitation when believed more harmful than beneficial

Journal of critical care, 2015
Wendy Cadge
Eric Krakauer
Andrew Courtwright
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of age, race, and functional status on decisions not to offer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) despite patient or surrogate requests that CPR be performed. This was a retrospective cohort study of all ethics committee consultations between 2007 and 2013 at a large academic hospital with a not offering CPR policy. There were 134 cases of disagreement over whether to provide CPR. In 45 cases (33.6%), the patient or surrogate agreed to a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order after initial ethics consultation. In 67 (75.3%) of the remaining 89 cases, the ethics committee recommended not offering CPR. In the other 22 (24.7%) cases, the ethics committee recommended offering CPR. There was no significant relationship between age, race, or functional status and the recommendation not to offer CPR. Patients who were not offered CPR were more likely to be critically ill (61.2% vs 18.2%, P < .001). The 90-day mortality rate among patients who were not offered ...

ellen robinson hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let ellen know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.