Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Affective Disorders
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jad
Research paper
Where the depressed mind wanders: Self-generated thought patterns
as assessed through experience sampling as a state marker of
depression
Ferdinand Hoffmann a,n, Christian Banzhaf b, Philipp Kanske a, Felix Bermpohl b,
Tania Singer a
a
b
Department of Social Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 9 December 2015
Received in revised form
28 February 2016
Accepted 5 March 2016
Available online 8 March 2016
Background: Self-generated thoughts (SGTs), such as during mind wandering, occupy much of our
waking life. Individuals with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are less in the “here and now” and prone
to rumination. Few studies have looked at SGTs in depression using experience sampling methods and no
study has so far investigated the specific contents of depressive SGTs and how they vary from one time
point to another.
Methods: MDD patients (n ¼25) and matched healthy controls (n¼26) performed an established mind
wandering task, involving non-demanding number discriminations. Intermittent probe questions ask for
participants' current SGTs, that is, how off-task the thoughts are, how positive or negative, self- or otherrelated, and past- or future-oriented.
Results: Multi-level modelling revealed that MDD patients engaged in more mind wandering than
healthy controls. Their SGTs were predominantly negative and less positive, more self-related and pastoriented. Strongest predictor of depressive SGT was the decreased positive valence of thoughts. MDD
patients' future and past-oriented thoughts were particularly more negative compared to healthy controls. Within MDD patients, the less positively valenced thoughts they had and the less variable these
thoughts were, the more depressive symptoms they showed.
Limitation: No other measures of rumination and worry were used.
Conclusion: MDD patients show a very specific SGT pattern, possibly reflecting ruminative and anxious
thoughts. This SGT pattern in depression might represent a useful state marker and even constitute an
etiological factor of this debilitating disease, considering the importance of current SGT on and individual's cognitive processes and affective states.
& 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Depression
Mind wandering
Experience sampling
Self-generated thought
State marker
1. Introduction
Self-generated thoughts (SGTs) arise independently of external
stimulation through the environment, and comprise experiences
such as mind wandering, day-dreaming, rumination and planning
(Smallwood, 2013). It is known that SGT forms a crucial part of
human mental activity, occupying up to 50% of our waking mind
(Kane et al., 2007; Killingsworth and Gilbert, 2010). Mind wandering occurs particularly when attentional and cognitive demands in relation to the external environment are low (e.g.
Smallwood et al., 2004). Some studies have linked SGT such as
n
Correspondence to: Department of Social Neuroscience Max-Planck Institute
for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Stephanstrasse 1a, 04105 Leipzig,
Germany.
E-mail address: hoffmann@cbs.mpg.de (F. Hoffmann).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.005
0165-0327/& 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
mind wandering to negative mood and unhappiness (Killingsworth and Gilbert, 2010; Stawarczyk et al., 2013), recent findings,
however, suggest that it is crucial to consider ‘where the mind
wanders’ and to look more specifically at the content of SGTs. For
example, in healthy individuals, past-focused thoughts seem to be
related to a reduction in positive mood, more depressive symptoms and increased cortisol levels after stress, while future-focused thoughts lead to an increase in positive mood and an attenuated stress response (Baird et al., 2011; Engert et al., 2014; Ruby
et al., 2013a; Smallwood and O’Connor, 2011; Smallwood et al.,
2007). Thus, SGT seems to represent a heterogeneous mental
phenomenon with variable effects on human cognition, affect and
behaviour (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014).
Patients with depression are known to show considerable difficulties with staying in the “here and now”. Investigations have
demonstrated that MDD patients tend to engage in maladaptive
128
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
SGTs in the form of excessive rumination and worry (NolenHoeksema, 1991, 2000; Watkins, 2008). Depressive rumination has
been characterized as a mode of responding to distress which
involves repetitively and passively focusing on symptoms of distress and on the possible causes and consequences of these
symptoms (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000). Worry, in contrast, has been
described as a chain of negative uncontrollable thoughts and
images, constituting an attempt to engage in problem-solving on
issues with an uncertain outcome (Borkovec et al., 1983). While
rumination and worry tend to correlate and share some similar
features such as their repetitive nature, they have also been found
to be statistically distinguishable (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). It
has thus been proposed that rumination is more past and present
oriented, focused on issues of self-worth, meaning and loss,
whereas worry seems to be future-oriented, focused on anticipating threats (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008; Watkins, 2008).
While both rumination and worry have been associated with depressive symptoms, rumination seems to be more strongly related
to depression (Hendriks et al., 2014; Hong, 2007). In MDD, rumination seems to represent a vulnerability marker for developing
the disorder, and also shows a relation to the duration of MDD
episodes and relapse probability (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008).
According to the cognitive model of depression, adverse early life
events lead to internalization of negative self-referential schemas
that subsequently bias information processing, in how stimuli are
encoded, organized and retrieved (Disner et al., 2011). Therefore,
these negative self-referential schemas might bias thoughts towards rumination of negative past experiences in depressive
patients.
Previous research on rumination and worry in depression has
been largely based on questionnaire and induction methods,
which both have considerable limitations and lack ecological validity. Questionnaire methods rely heavily on retrospection which
is often impaired in psychiatric populations. Most induction
methods prompt participants towards rumination about certain
subjects (thinking e.g. about the long-term goals you have set),
which then is compared to distraction inductions, asking the
participants to focus on non-self-relevant images (Nolen-Hoeksema and Morrow, 1993). However without no-intervention control
conditions, the effects between the two different conditions are
difficult to disentangle. More critically these induction methods do
not capture momentary online thoughts. In contrast growing research on SGTs in healthy individuals suggests that if one wants to
make more objective claims about the wandering mind in health
or in depression one ought to investigate SGTs using online experience sampling measures. Such online-measures of SGTs would
allow picking up disease specific SGT patterns in the moment
when they actually occur, and are particularly useful in depression
research as ecological momentary assessment avoids the recall
bias toward negative memories and also allows for better generalization to real life. To our knowledge only one study looked at
online SGTs in clinically depressed participants (Ottaviani et al.,
2014). Using an experience sampling method this study categorized SGTs in depression as either normal mind wandering, on task
thoughts or perseverative cognition, linking the latter to autonomic inflexibility in lower heart-rate variability. No study however has so far tried to objectively decompose the specific SGT
contents in clinical depression, regarding the previously established temporal (past or future oriented), social (self or other related), and emotional (negative or positive) dimensions of SGT
(Engert et al., 2014; Ruby et al., 2013a, 2013b). From a clinical
perspective identifying the specific SGT pattern in depression
seems of great interest, as such SGT pattern could function as a
state marker of depression, which could potentially then be utilized as a measure of disease progression and therapeutic change,
as well as helping better differentiation of mental disorders. In
addition it is unknown how these SGT contents in MDD patients
relative to healthy controls vary over time, which could function as
a good indicator of the repetitiveness of thoughts, inherent in
rumination and also worry. This study thus aimed to comprehensively investigate the space of SGTs in depression in terms of
amount, content and variability.
Based of clinical observation and description disordered
thoughts in depression have been commonly conceptualized as
rumination and worry. Such disordered thoughts in depression can
however, considering the recent findings in mind wandering research possibly more accurately be described by pathological SGTs
in depression. In this study we thus aimed to specifically investigate
the online SGT contents and their variability in a sample of clinically
depressed patients. We used an established non-demanding choice
reaction time task (CRT) that allows spontaneous SGTs in participants. During this task participants are asked at random time
points, first, how much they were on task, and, secondly, about the
specific content of their thoughts (Engert et al., 2014; Ruby et al.,
2013a, 2013b), such as questions asking if their thoughts were focused on certain temporal epochs (future or past), involved different referents (self or other) and varied in valence (negative or positive). This task is particularly useful as an objective online measure
of the amount and specific content of SGTs, but also of their
variability over time, as participants are asked about the SGTs repeatedly throughout the task. One index of thought variability is the
fluctuation of thought ratings from one thought probe to the next,
computed as the squared successive difference in ratings, which has
been an established method in experience sampling studies (EbnerPriemer et al., 2007; Jahng et al., 2008; Skirrow et al., 2014; Trull
et al., 2008). Another index of variability represents the extremity of
the thought ratings, calculated as the squared difference of each
rating from the mean for that variable.
We first hypothesized that MDD patients relative to healthy
controls would generally show more mind wandering, that is engage in more SGTs, being less in the ‘here and now’, and that these
stimulus independent thoughts would be more negative, self, and
past related in accordance with the cognitive model of depression
and findings on increased rumination in depression. Secondly, we
also hypothesized that MDD patients would think more about
negative future events, possibly pointing to their tendency to engage in stronger worrying compared to healthy controls. Thirdly
we expected that MDD patients would also show less variability
and more rigid thought patterns compared to healthy controls,
capturing the repetitive nature of their thoughts. Lastly we expected a relation between symptom severity and specific patterns
in SGTs and their variability in depression.
2. Methods
2.1. Participants
25 patients with depression were recruited through the inpatient clinic of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, or were
referred to us by specialized clinicians (see Table 1). 26 healthy
control (HC) participants matched to the patients in terms of years
of education, age, and gender with no history of psychiatric or
neurological disorders were recruited by public notices and from
project databases of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin. Participants were assessed for mental disorders using the Structured
Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association,
2000) and a diagnosis of acute state of depression was confirmed
with no other primary diagnoses. All participants completed the
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, Hautzinger et al., 1995), and were
also assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Sale (HAMD-17,
Hamilton, 1960). Additionally, participants completed a measure of
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
Table 1
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants.
Sample size
Gender
Age
Education (years)
Verbal IQ (WST)
BDI
HAMD-21
Healthy
controls
MDD patients Significant effects
(p o 0.05)
26
10 males
41.9 (13.6)
16.9 (2.9)
105.4 (7.5)
2.5 (3.8)
0.77 (1.6)
25
8 males
41.1 (12.6)
15.2 (3.2)
100.7 (11.4)
32.0 (9.6)
20.4 (3.6)
*
*
129
5) negatively valenced and 6) positively valenced and 7) how
much off task their thoughts were at that point in time. Additionally, they rated their current mood (i.e. how positive and
how negative they felt). Importantly healthy controls and MDD
patients did not differ in terms of accuracy (healthy controls:
87.2%, MDD patients: 86.4%) and reaction time (healthy controls:
882.29 ms, MDD patients: 923.62 ms) on the CRT task (more detail
reported in Section 3). The entire task lasted approximately
14 min. Stimuli were presented using E-prime 2.0 (Psychology
Software Tools, Inc., Sharpsburg, PA, USA).
2.3. Data analysis
Table 2
Medication of MDD patients.
Medication
Number of participants
SSRI
NaSSA
SNRI
NDRI
TCA
AAP
SSRIþLithium
TCA þLithium
NaSSA þ Lithium
SSRIþAAP
SNRIþ AAP
SSRIþTCA
SSRIþAgomelatine
AAPþ Lithium
SSRIþNaSSA
6
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
crystallized intelligence (Wortschatztest, WST, a vocabulary test
part of the HAWIE-R, the German adaptation of the Wechsler Adult
Intelligence Scale, Schmidt and Metzler, 1992). All MDD patients
except one were on medication (see Table 2). No patient was
medicated with benzodiazepines for at least 48 h. Exclusion criteria
included any comorbid axis I disorder, current neurological disorder, substance abuse within 6 months before study participation,
diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder or borderline personality disorder. None of the patients had a history of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The study was approved by the local research ethics committee (Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin) and
written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
2.2. CRT task
We used an established mind wandering paradigm that probes
off-task thoughts during a choice reaction time task (Baird et al.,
2012; Ruby et al., 2013a; Smallwood et al., 2013) and assessed the
content of the participants' thoughts on six different dimensions
1) past, 2) future, 3) self, 4) other, 5) negative valence and 6) positive valence (e.g. Engert et al., 2014; Ruby et al., 2013a). A series
of black digits between 1 and 8 was presented. One sixth of the
digits was presented in red color signaling participants that they
should indicate via button press if this number was odd or even.
Black digits were presented for 1000 ms and red digits for
2000 ms. Responses had to be made while the colored digits were
still present on the screen. Stimuli were separated by a fixation
cross of variable duration (2200–4400 ms).
The number of thought probes and their presentation were
randomly determined (Ruby et al., 2013a), to avoid any expectancy
biases, and thus sampling SGTs in the most unconstrained way
(number of probes between four and nine). Participants were
asked to rate their current thoughts using a nine-point Likert scale
on several dimensions including how much their thoughts were 1)
past-oriented, 2) future-oriented, 3) self-related, 4) other-related,
For the main analyses, we used multi-level models because
they take correlated observations within individuals into account
and perform well with missing data or unequal numbers of data
points within individuals (Jahng et al., 2008). Linear mixed models
were calculated in SPSS version 22 with the number of the particular sampling point within the session (e.g., sample 5) as covariate and with a random intercept. Sampling point was used as a
covariate within the models to account for different numbers of
sampling points between the participants. In addition to the rating
level (e.g. to what extent was a certain thought negative or selfrelated), we investigated two indices of variability, i.e., fluctuations
and extremity in ratings. To obtain a measure of how much individuals fluctuate in their single SGT ratings from one thought
probe to the next, we calculated squared successive differences,
which has been established in experience sampling studies (Ebner-Priemer et al., 2007; Jahng et al., 2008; Skirrow et al., 2014;
Trull et al., 2008). Fluctuation scores were calculated for each SGT
dimension separately. To obtain a measure of how extreme the
individual ratings were, we calculated the squared difference of
each rating from the total sample mean (including healthy controls
and MDD patients) for that variable. In contrast to the fluctuations,
this does not take into account how big successive changes are,
but rather indicates how much a certain rating differs from the
“norm”. As a measure of effect size for the central main effects and
interaction effects Omega-squared (ω2) was calculated by taking
the difference from 1 and the variance of the residuals of the full
model divided by the variance of the residuals of the model
without the respective fixed factor of interest (Xu, 2003). A value
of ω2 ¼.010 represents a small effect size, a value of ω2 ¼.059 indicates a medium effect size and a value of ω2 ¼.138 represents a
large effect size (Kirk, 1996). In a first step, differences between
MDD patients and HCs in ratings levels, fluctuations in ratings, and
extremity in ratings (see below for details) were subjected to
multi-level models as described above. In a second step we tested
for group differences and in particular interrelations of the different content dimensions of SGT, on which healthy controls and
MDD patients were found to differ. This allowed us to investigate
whether certain SGTs were more strongly correlated with one
another in MDD patients compared to healthy controls. Finally in a
third step, we investigated how symptom severity in healthy
controls and MDD patients related to the different SGT measures
(rating, fluctuation, extremity). Symptom severity in healthy controls and MDD patients might relate to very specific SGTs. In the
case of healthy controls such SGTs might represent a vulnerability
factor towards the development of depression.
3. Results
3.1. Performance
Independent samples t-tests showed no significant differences
between healthy controls and MDD patients in accuracy (t(49) ¼
130
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
Table 3
Differences between MDD patients and HCs in rating levels, fluctuations in ratings and extremity in ratings as estimated with multi-level modelling.
Model parameters
Predictors
Rating levels
b
Off task
Fluctuations in ratings
S.E.
p-value
ω2
b
S.E.
Extremity of ratings
p-value
ω2
b
S.E.
p-value
ω2
Intercept
Group
Sample
6.634
24.736
2.571
4.363
5.432
0.734
0.140
0.001
0.001
0.108
0.050
359.591
277.831
43.210
203.236
180.207
45.631
0.078
0.124
0.345
0.009
0.004
846.379
75.813
60.207
147.244
184.016
17.665
o 0.001
0.682
0.001
0.002
0.033
Intercept
Group
Sample
25.859
2.930
1.268
4.221
5.403
0.622
o 0.001
0.593
0.042
0.004
0.012
933.098
43.052
2.681
206.792
268.797
49.229
o 0.001
0.874
0.957
o 0.001
0.004
680.979
120.726
11.640
104.074
113.300
21.552
o 0.001
0.287
0.590
0.006
0.003
Intercept
Group
Sample
45.729
21.686
2.879
3.634
4.446
0.869
o 0.001
o 0.001
0.007
0.070
0.052
857.550
300.419
21.361
246.294
218.004
55.763
0.001
0.169
0.702
0.008
0.001
990.713
108.317
10.471
125.197
143.679
19.568
o 0.001
0.451
0.593
0.004
o 0.001
Intercept
Group
Sample
45.036
26.220
3.109
5.374
7.024
0.660
o 0.001
0.001
o 0.001
0.191
0.053
268.231
122.903
6.681
117.744
104.220
26.658
0.024
0.239
0.802
0.006
o 0.001
1032.565
115.103
7.895
133.213
170.661
17.227
o 0.001
0.503
0.647
0.011
o 0.001
Intercept
Group
Sample
40.583
28.135
1.449
4.665
5.724
0.492
o 0.001
o 0.001
0.006
0.226
0.013
524.571
2.515
45.744
108.168
105.093
21.686
o 0.001
0.981
0.036
o 0.001
0.018
845.119
62.209
5.986
132.122
166.982
16.267
o 0.001
0.711
0.713
0.003
o 0.001
Intercept
Group
Sample
28.7787
16.268
1.661
3.417
4.344
0.672
o 0.001
0.001
0.014
0.129
0.050
352.832
461.218
54.674
219.309
244.840
43.935
0.108
0.062
0.214
0.020
0.018
852.037
304.787
45.124
215.769
215.674
20.314
o 0.001
0.166
0.029
0.016
0.017
Intercept
Group
Sample
24.160
10.964
3.680
5.001
6.068
0.725
o 0.001
0.077
o 0.001
0.021
0.087
954.850
40.411
48.768
235.007
208.597
52.983
o 0.001
0.847
0.358
o 0.001
0.003
787.485
105.544
47.501
125.673
145.361
29.654
o 0.001
0.470
0.112
0.014
0.020
Negative
mood
Intercept
Group
Sample
49.204
19.361
1.820
3.943
5.877
0.594
o 0.001
0.002
0.003
0.134
0.030
688.076
199.076
55.060
194.558
181.977
32.040
0.001
0.279
0.087
0.009
0.009
662.681
22.053
44.862
124.650
162.188
13.689
o 0.001
0.892
0.001
0.001
0.003
Positive
mood
Intercept
Group
Sample
37.993
25.131
1.357
3.667
5.048
0.491
o 0.001
o 0.001
0.006
0.240
0.010
257.217
23.414
2.991
73.350
65.278
16.133
0.001
0.720
0.853
o 0.001
0.032
607.443
32.923
20.523
118.0167
152.701
12.877
o 0.001
0.830
0.112
0.001
0.002
Other
Self
Negative
Positive
Past
Future
Note: sample represents the covariate of the number of sampling points of the thought probes.
0.13, p ¼.894; healthy controls: 87.2% 717.3, MDD patients: 86.4%
724.7) or reaction times (t(49) ¼1.26, p ¼.212; healthy controls:
882.29 ms 7106.24, MDD patients: 923.62 ms 7126.74) in the
CRT.
3.2. Mood probes
Multilevel models revealed that MDD patients showed elevated
levels of negative and decreased levels of positive mood (see Table 3 and Fig. 1 Supplemental material). The fluctuations and extremity of the mood ratings were not significantly different between groups.
3.3. Thought probes
3.3.1. Rating levels
Multilevel models revealed that MDD patients show significantly increased off-task thoughts, relative to the healthy
controls (see Fig. 1 and Table 3). Regarding the particular SGT
contents, MDD patients reported more negative and less positive,
as well as more past- and self-related thoughts compared to
healthy controls. MDD patients also engaged in marginally more
future-oriented SGTs. Number of sampling points (“Sample”), was
included as a covariate in all analyses. Non-significant results of
the number of sampling points particularly for fluctuation and
extremity suggest that variability measures were not as strongly
influenced by the number of sampling points, thus did not change
as much over the course of the experiment, as the ratings themselves. Including current mood as a covariate showed significant
relations between mood and thought valence, but did not change
the group differences in positive (b ¼7.800, S.E. ¼2.940, p ¼ .010)
and negative thoughts (b ¼ 15.4435, S.E. ¼4.124, p ¼.001). There
were no group differences in the amount of other-related
thoughts. While healthy controls had more positive thoughts than
negative thoughts (t(25) ¼ 4.022, p o .001), MDD patients had
marginally more negative thoughts than positive thoughts (t(24)¼
1.981, p¼ .059).
3.3.2. Variability
There were no significant differences between the groups in
extremity of SGTs (see Table 3). There was however a marginally
significant group difference in fluctuations of past-related
thoughts, with MDD patients showing less fluctuating past-related
SGTs (see Table 3).
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
131
Table 4
Significant differences in interrelations between SGT contents in MDD patients and
healthy controls as estimated with multi-level modelling.
Model parameters
Predictors
Rating levels
b
Negative
Negative
Fig. 1. Amount of SGT and SGT contents for healthy controls and MDD patients.
Depressed patients showed increased negative and decreased positive as well as
increased self- and past-related thoughts, relative to healthy controls (error bars
represent standard errors).
3.3.3. SGT contents as predictors of MDD
Looking at what SGT content was the most accurate in distinguishing between MDD patients and healthy controls a stepwise
logistic regression was performed on the two groups, with the six
SGT contents as predictors (past, future, other, self, negative, positive). The results showed that the amount of positive thoughts
was most discriminative between the two groups (B ¼ 0.45,
Wald ¼ 59. 05, p o.001, Nagelkerke R square¼ .323).
3.3.4. Interrelations between SGT contents in MDD patients and
healthy controls
Looking specifically at interrelations of the different content
dimensions of SGT, multi-level models were used on the SGT
contents in which MDD patients and healthy controls were found
to differ (self, past, negative, positive, see Section 3.3.1). These
analyses were run to investigate whether certain SGTs tended to
interrelate more strongly in MDD patients relative to healthy
controls. Each SGT content was used as a covariate to investigate
interrelation with another SGT (as dependent variable), while
group was used as an independent factor (healthy controls vs MDD
patients). This resulted in twelve separate models, with only the
significant models reported in Table 4. In particular, it was found
that MDD patients' temporal thoughts of past and future were
significantly more negatively valenced in comparison to the
healthy controls (see Fig. 2 and Table 4), suggesting a stronger
preoccupation with negative past and negative future events. In
contrast positive thoughts in healthy controls were more pastrelated compared to MDD patients. In addition past-oriented
thoughts were more self-related in MDD patients compared to
healthy controls.
3.4. Relation of SGT variables to symptom severity
3.4.1. MDD patients
To test for a relation of the observed effects with symptom
severity in the MDD group, we ran two separate liner-mixed
models with BDI and Hamilton scores as covariates. Both symptom
severity measures, BDI and Hamilton scores showed a significant
positive correlation (healthy controls: r ¼0.68, p o0.01; MDD patients: r ¼0.43, p¼ 0.03). BDI was a marginal predictor for the
amount of mind wandering in general (b ¼ 0.942, S.E.¼ 0.500,
p ¼0.071). Looking specifically at SGT contents, BDI was a predictor
of increased levels of past-related thoughts (b ¼1.109, S.E. ¼0.497,
Positive
Past
S.E.
p-value
ω2
Intercept
Group
Sample
Past*Group
38.418
20.527
2.803
0.217
5.543
6.406
0.760
0.092
o 0.001
0.002
0.001
0.019
0.074
0.017
0.032
Intercept
Group
Sample
Future*Group
41.157
22.254
3.025
0.173
5.746
6.901
0.794
0.083
o 0.001
0.002
o 0.001
0.038
0.106
0.043
0.014
Intercept
Group
Sample
Past*Group
46.546
20.628
1.419
0.245
4.896
6.156
0.516
0.085
o 0.001
0.001
0.009
0.004
0.107
o 0.001
0.041
Intercept
Group
Sample
Self*Group
13.961
4.647
1.299
0.179
5.927
6.337
0.543
0.085
0.022
0.466
0.017
0.036
o 0.001
0.032
0.019
Note: sample represents the covariate of the number of sampling points of the
thought probes.
p ¼0.045), and a marginally significant predictor of decreased
positive valence (b ¼ 0.863, S.E. ¼0.420, p¼ 0.050). Hamilton
scores were a significant predictor of future-related thoughts
(b ¼4.271, S.E. ¼0.623, p o0.001) and negative valence (b ¼2.369,
S.E.¼1.293, p¼ 0.080). These findings suggest that more severe
symptoms are associated with an increase in specific SGT contents.
Relating symptom severity to SGT fluctuations, BDI scores were
found to be a predictor of the fluctuations in self-related thoughts
(b ¼ 39,527, S.E.¼14.031, p ¼0.006) and fluctuations in negative
(b ¼ 18,634, S.E.¼ 8.369, p ¼0.027) and positive valence
(b ¼ 20,029, S.E. ¼7.460, p ¼0.008). Hamilton scores were found
to be a predictor of the fluctuations in self-related thoughts
(b ¼ 74,202, S.E.¼ 34.163, p ¼0.032) and fluctuations positive
valence (b ¼ 54,834, S.E.¼18.460, p ¼ 0.004). These findings
suggest that, the more severe the depressive symptoms in MDD
patients were the less variable the reported experience of specific
SGTs in the course of the experiment was.
Relating symptom severity to SGT extremity, BDI was found to
be a predictor of extremity in past-related thoughts (b ¼34,396, S.
E. ¼713.425, p ¼0.015). Hamilton was a predictor of extremity in
future-related thoughts (b ¼ 91,014, S.E. ¼27.059, p ¼0.001).
3.4.2. Healthy controls
Another interesting question was how depressive symptomatology in healthy controls related to SGTs, possibly indicating that
certain SGTs can indicate a vulnerability to developing depression.
BDI was found to be a marginal predictor of the amount of pastrelated thoughts (b ¼1.492, S.E. ¼0.775, p ¼ 0.067). Hamilton
scores were also found to be a significant predictor of the amount
of past-related thoughts (b ¼ 4.025, S.E.¼ 1.718, p¼ 0.023.
Symptom severity was found to be unrelated to fluctuations in
SGTs in healthy controls. BDI (b ¼ 54.687, S.E.¼ 16.886, p¼ 0.001),
as well as Hamilton (b ¼ 70.058, S.E.¼ 41.067, p ¼0.090) were
found to be a predictor of extremity in the amount of general mind
wandering.
132
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
Fig. 2. (A) In contrast to healthy controls, MDD patients show a significant positive relation between the negative valence and past-relatedness of SGTs. (B) In contrast to
healthy controls, MDD patients show a significant positive relation between the negative valence and future-relatedeness of SGTs.
4. Discussion
In this study we aimed to investigate thinking patterns related
to mind wandering in clinical depression relative to healthy controls using an objective online-measure, a mind wandering laboratory task that probes the amount and specific content of taskunrelated thoughts in the moment in which they occur. More
specifically the content of thoughts was assessed on following six
dimensions: 1) past, 2) future, 3) self, 4) other, 5) negative valence
and 6) positive valence (Engert et al., 2014; Ruby et al., 2013a,
2013b). In addition to typically used average scores of STG frequencies, we also looked here at fluctuation and extremity of SGTs
as a measure of variability over time. We hypothesized that MDD
patients relative to healthy controls would engage in more mind
wandering, showing a specific SGT pattern possibly related to rumination and worry. In addition we expected that the amount and
also the variability of depression specific SGTs would relate to
symptom severity.
As hypothesized MDD patients engaged in a greater amount of
SGTs compared to healthy controls, showing more off-task mind
wandering, being less in the “here and now”. The SGT pattern in
MDD patients relative to healthy controls was characterized by
significantly more self- and past-related thoughts that were more
negative and less positive in valence. In particular, MDD patients'
past-related thoughts were strongly coupled to negatively valenced SGTs. These findings suggest that distorted thought processes in depression can be very well captured and described in
online depressive mind wandering. This specific depressive SGT
pattern might in part relate to pathological rumination about negative past events, which is commonly found to be increased in
depression (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991, 2000). Supporting this suggestion, the “feelings of guilt” item of the Hamilton scale including
questions about rumination was particularly associated with pastrelated thoughts in MDD patients (see Supplemental Information).
This SGT pattern is also in accordance with the three proposed
elements of rumination (Disner et al., 2011): altered emotion and
memory processing, increased self-referential processing, and
decreased top-down inhibition of these processes.
Interestingly, the strongest predictor of depressive SGT was the
positive valence of the thoughts. This is in accordance with some
findings showing that the absence of positive affect might be actually more indicative of the depressive state, as increased negative affect is shared by most mood and anxiety disorders (Watson
et al., 1988). Further, symptom severity also related with the
amount of positive thoughts within the group of the MDD patients, as well as their variance. This suggests that the low and flat
positive valence of thoughts plays a crucial functional role in depression and its severity. Findings of decreased positive affect in
response to rewards and abnormal functioning of reward sensitive
brain areas such as the nucleus accumbens in depression (Heller
et al., 2009), might be seen as further support. In the case of the
healthy controls depressive symptoms were related to increased
amount of past-related thoughts as previously reported (Ruby
et al., 2013a; Smallwood and O’Connor, 2011; Smallwood et al.,
2007). Past-related thoughts might therefore represent a vulnerability factor for depression, possibly related to a ruminative response style, which has been shown to be associated with onset,
maintenance and reoccurrence of depressive episodes (NolenHoeksema, 2000; Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008).
While MDD patients only marginally engaged in more futurerelated thoughts, their future-oriented thoughts were significantly
more negative than in healthy controls. This could be interpreted
as a SGT pattern of worry, and indeed the somatic anxiety scale of
the Hamilton scale was positively related to future thoughts in
MDD patients, lending support for this suggestion (see Supplemental information). Interestingly future-related thoughts in
healthy controls have mostly been associated with adaptive and
beneficial effects such as increasing subsequent positive mood and
attenuated cortisol levels at baseline and after a stressor (Engert
et al., 2014; Ruby et al., 2013a). It has also been suggested that
future-oriented SGT is instrumental in autobiographical planning
and consolidation (Baird et al., 2011; Smallwood et al., 2011). Our
results do show however that in the case of clinical depression
future thoughts are negative and potentially maladaptive being
related to worry that exacerbates the depressive state.
In this study we also looked at SGT variability over time given
the multiple sampling points of the thought probes. We used two
indices of SGT variability, namely the fluctuation of the SGT
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
ratings, and the extremity of the SGT ratings, which both can be
seen as a good indicator of the repetitiveness or perseverance of
thoughts, such as present in depressive rumination and worry.
Significant group differences were only found for the fluctuation of
past-related thoughts, with MDD patients showing less variability
in past-related thoughts compared to healthy controls. In addition,
symptom severity in MDD patients related to fluctuations in SGTs.
Particularly, the stronger the symptoms that the MDD patients
portrayed, the less self-related, positive and negative thoughts
fluctuated. Similarly symptom severity in MDD patients was associated with the extremity of future-related SGTs. In general
these findings suggest that the stronger the depressive symptoms
portrayed by MDD patients, the more rigid certain SGTs are over
time. In particular the less variable the positive valence of such
SGTs is, the more repetitive and perseverative certain thoughts
and the corresponding affect are. Increasing inflexibility in SGTs in
depression might be associated with reported cognitive inflexibility in depression (Altamirano et al., 2010; Joormann et al., 2011;
Whitmer and Gotlib, 2013), due to serotonergic dysregulation
within prefrontal cortex (Clarke et al., 2004).
From a clinical point of view, identifying SGT patterns of MDD
and other mental disorders seems to be of relevance. Disease
specific SGT patterns can function as state markers, which can be
utilized to monitor disease progression and more importantly
therapeutic changes and shifts towards more adaptive SGTs.
Mapping disease specific SGT patterns, could be also further
helpful for diagnostic purposes. As decreased positive valence of
SGT was most representative of the depressive mind, one could
envision how therapies fostering self-compassion and positive
affect might be particularly useful for clinical interventions (Van
Dam et al., 2011). In addition mindfulness-based therapies have
been shown to be very effective in treating depression, by increasing momentary positive emotions and reward experience
(e.g. Geschwind et al., 2011) and decreasing negative mind wandering in terms of ruminative thinking (e.g. Ramel et al., 2004). For
future studies it would be interesting to compare SGT patterns
between different mental disorders. Naturally, investigating SGT
patterns in anxiety disorders relative to depression would be very
interesting, particularly as there exists a high comorbidity between these two disorders. It could be assumed that the SGT
pattern of anxiety disorders relative to MDD shifts more strongly
in the temporal domain towards future, representing pathological
worry, while being possibly equally negative and self focused.
Additionally it would be interesting to explore how SGT patterns
change in remission from depression. Investigating SGT “online”
with tasks such as the CRT combined with assessment of the different thought content dimensions, as used in this study could
represent a more objective measure than clinical interviews and
self-reports. Particularly self-reports demand a certain amount of
retrospection and introspection, which are often deficient in many
mental disorders.
4.1. Limitations
One limitation of the present study is that no other measures of
rumination and worry were available to relate these to the SGT
pattern in depression, and strongly validate the interpretation of
rumination and worry. In addition the study was based on a relatively small sample size.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion this study aimed to investigate the specific contents of online SGTs and their variability in depression. The findings show that MDD patients engaged in more SGTs than healthy
133
controls that were seemingly ruminative in nature, being more
negative and less positive in valence as well as more self- and past
related. Particularly in the temporal domain, MDD patients'
thoughts about the past and the future were more negatively valenced. The decreased positive valence of SGTs was the best predictor for depression. Additionally the variability in SGTs related
negatively to symptom severity in depression. Investigating different SGT patterns of mental disorders such as depression using
event-sampling online measures can be useful for deriving state
markers that may help diagnosis and intervention.
Appendix A. Supporting information
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
the online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.005.
References
Altamirano, L.J., Miyake, A., Whitmer, A.J., 2010. When mental inflexibility facilitates executive control beneficial side effects of ruminative tendencies on goal
maintenance. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1–6.
American Psychiatric Association, 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC.
Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Smallwood, J., Spreng, R.N., 2014. The default network and
self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical
relevance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1316, 29–52.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M.D., Kam, J.W., Franklin, M.S., Schooler, J.W., 2012.
Inspired by distraction: mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol.
Sci. 23, 1117–1122.
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W., 2011. Back to the future: autobiographical
planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Conscious. Cogn. 20,
1604–1611.
Borkovec, T.D., Robinson, E., Pruzinsky, T., DePree, J.A., 1983. Preliminary exploration of worry: some characteristics and processes. Behav. Res. Ther. 21, 9–16.
Clarke, H., Dalley, J., Crofts, H., Robbins, T., Roberts, A., 2004. Cognitive inflexibility
after prefrontal serotonin depletion. Science 304, 878–880.
Disner, S.G., Beevers, C.G., Haigh, E.A., Beck, A.T., 2011. Neural mechanisms of the
cognitive model of depression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 467–477.
Ebner-Priemer, U.W., Kuo, J., Kleindienst, N., Welch, S.S., Reisch, T., Reinhard, I., Lieb,
K., Linehan, M.M., Bohus, M., 2007. State affective instability in borderline
personality disorder assessed by ambulatory monitoring. Psychol. Med. 37,
961–970.
Engert, V., Smallwood, J., Singer, T., 2014. Mind your thoughts: associations between self-generated thoughts and stress-induced and baseline levels of cortisol and alpha-amylase. Biol. Psychol. 103, 283–291.
Geschwind, N., Peeters, F., Drukker, M., van Os, J., Wichers, M., 2011. Mindfulness
training increases momentary positive emotions and reward experience in
adults vulnerable to depression: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin.
Psychol. 79, 618.
Hamilton, M., 1960. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry
23, 56–62.
Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H., Keller, F., 1995. BDI Beck-Depressions-Inventar.
Verlag Hans Huber. Bern.
Heller, A.S., Johnstone, T., Shackman, A.J., Light, S.N., Peterson, M.J., Kolden, G.G.,
Kalin, N.H., Davidson, R.J., 2009. Reduced capacity to sustain positive emotion in
major depression reflects diminished maintenance of fronto-striatal brain activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 22445–22450.
Hendriks, S.M., Licht, C.M., Spijker, J., Beekman, A.T., Hardeveld, F., de Graaf, R.,
Penninx, B.W., 2014. Disorder-specific cognitive profiles in major depressive
disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. BMC Psychiatry 14, 1–9.
Hong, R.Y., 2007. Worry and rumination: differential associations with anxious and
depressive symptoms and coping behavior. Behav. Res. Ther. 45, 277–290.
Jahng, S., Wood, P.K., Trull, T.J., 2008. Analysis of affective instability in ecological
momentary assessment: indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychol. Methods 13, 354–375.
Joormann, J., Levens, S.M., Gotlib, I.H., 2011. Sticky thoughts depression and rumination are associated with difficulties manipulating emotional material in
working memory. Psychol. Sci. 22, 979–983.
Kane, M.J., Brown, L.H., McVay, J.C., Silvia, P.J., Myin-Germeys, I., Kwapil, T.R., 2007.
For whom the mind wanders, and when an experience-sampling study of
working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychol. Sci. 18, 614–621.
Killingsworth, M.A., Gilbert, D.T., 2010. A wandering mind is an unhappy mind.
Science 330, 932.
Kirk, R.E., 1996. Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 56, 746–759.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., 1991. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 100, 569–582.
134
F. Hoffmann et al. / Journal of Affective Disorders 198 (2016) 127–134
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., 2000. The role of rumination in depressive disorders and
mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 109, 504–511.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Morrow, J., 1993. Effects of rumination and distraction on
naturally occurring depressed mood. Cogn. Emot. 7, 561–570.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B.E., Lyubomirsky, S., 2008. Rethinking rumination.
Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 400–424.
Ottaviani, C., Shahabi, L., Tarvainen, M., Cook, I., Abrams, M., Shapiro, D., 2014.
Cognitive, behavioral, and autonomic correlates of mind wandering and Perseverative cognition in major depression. Front. Neurosci. 8, 1–9.
Ramel, W., Goldin, P.R., Carmona, P.E., McQuaid, J.R., 2004. The effects of mindfulness meditation on cognitive processes and affect in patients with past depression. Cognit. Ther. Res. 28, 433–455.
Ruby, F.J., Smallwood, J., Engen, H., Singer, T., 2013a. How self-generated thought
shapes mood—the relation between mind-wandering and mood depends on
the socio-temporal content of thoughts. PLoS One 8, e77554.
Ruby, F.J., Smallwood, J., Sackur, J., Singer, T., 2013b. Is self-generated thought a
means of social problem solving? Front. Psychol. 4, 1–10.
Schmidt, K.-H., Metzler, P., 1992. Wortschatztest. WST. Beltz.
Skirrow, C., Ebner-Priemer, U., Reinhard, I., Malliaris, Y., Kuntsi, J., Asherson, P., 2014.
Everyday emotional experience of adults with attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder: evidence for reactive and endogenous emotional lability. Psychol.
Med. 44, 3571–3583.
Smallwood, J., 2013. Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: a processoccurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychol. Bull. 139,
519.
Smallwood, J., Davies, J.B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M., O’Connor, R.,
Obonsawin, M., 2004. Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: task
engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Conscious. Cogn.
13, 657–690.
Smallwood, J., O’Connor, R.C., 2011. Imprisoned by the past: unhappy moods lead to
a retrospective bias to mind wandering. Cogn. Emot. 25, 1481–1490.
Smallwood, J., O’Connor, R.C., Sudbery, M.V., Obonsawin, M., 2007. Mind-wandering and dysphoria. Cogn. Emot. 21, 816–842.
Smallwood, J., Ruby, F.J., Singer, T., 2013. Letting go of the present: mind-wandering
is associated with reduced delay discounting. Conscious. Cogn. 22, 1–7.
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.W., Turk, D.J., Cunningham, S.J., Burns, P., Macrae, C.N.,
2011. Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Conscious.
Cogn. 20, 1120–1126.
Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., D’Argembeau, A., 2013. Concern-induced negative affect
is associated with the occurrence and content of mind-wandering. Conscious.
Cogn. 22, 442–448.
Trull, T.J., Solhan, M.B., Tragesser, S.L., Jahng, S., Wood, P.K., Piasecki, T.M., Watson,
D., 2008. Affective instability: measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment. J. Abnorm Psychol. 117,
647–661.
Van Dam, N.T., Sheppard, S.C., Forsyth, J.P., Earleywine, M., 2011. Self-compassion is
a better predictor than mindfulness of symptom severity and quality of life in
mixed anxiety and depression. J. Anxiety Disord. 25, 123–130.
Watkins, E.R., 2008. Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychol.
Bull. 134, 163–206.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Carey, G., 1988. Positive and negative affectivity and their
relation to anxiety and depressive disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 97, 346–353.
Whitmer, A.J., Gotlib, I.H., 2013. An attentional scope model of rumination. Psychol.
Bull. 139, 1036–1061.
Xu, R., 2003. Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Stat.
Med. 22, 3527–3541.