Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

paper.docx

Bus 430 assignment 2 [Pin It] Research two (2) manufacturing or two (2) service companies that manage inventory and complete this assignment. Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you: Determine the types of inventories these companies currently manage and describe their essential inventory characteristics. Analyze how each of their goods and service design concepts are integrated. Evaluate the role their inventory plays in the company’s performance, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction. Compare and contrast the four (4) different types of layouts found with each company; explain the importance of the layouts to the company’s manufacturing or service operations. Determine at least two (2) metrics to evaluate supply chain performance of the companies; suggest improvements to the design and operations of their supply chains based on those metrics. Suggest ways to improve the inventory management for each of the companies without affecting operations and the customer benefit package. Provide a rationale to support the suggestion. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Evaluate the processes used in designing and producing goods and services. Determine four layout patterns and when they should be used. Utilize the concept of supply chain management. Employ the concept of capacity management. Evaluate the management of inventories and resources. Use technology and information resources to research issues in operations management. Write clearly and concisely about operations management using proper writing mechanics.

Inventory management Name Institution Date Procter and Gamble and Pepsi Company have been chosen as the companies of choice for the paper. Procter and Gamble and Pepsi Company are two major companies that have been considered as leaders in their respective industries that they operate in. Procter and Gamble produces household goods meant for beauty while Pepsi Company is a leading company that produces beverages for its customers globally. Analysis of both companies will provide an insight on inventory management, thereby providing important information on inventory decisions that similar organizations need to make in order to attain their goals and objectives. Characteristics of the different types of inventories Pepsi and Proctor and Gamble use coherent frameworks in making their inventory decisions, which reduces their inventory surpluses. In analysis of Pepsi Company, the company has been able to introduce the Economic order (EOQ) in order management. Through this structure in inventory management, it has been possible for the company to reduce its costs in ordering. Analysis of the company has also shown that Pepsi Company uses ABC inventory control system. Through this system, the company has been able to maintain its inventories by prioritizing the goods that have the highest value. Proctor and Gamble has also created an inventory control system that is based on a spreadsheet. Through this system, the company is in a position to track and organize data, which enables the company to control its inventory and manage the supply chains. Proctor and Gamble uses Consumer-Driven Supply Network (CDSN) in being able to generate its sales. However, Pepsi uses just-in-time (JIT) in being able to synchronize the deliveries that it makes (Visconti, 2012). In evaluating the features of the inventories for both Pespsi and Proctor and Gamble companies, the main similarity is the large stocks especially during manufacturing, selling period, work-in-process inventories during manufacturing and the goods along the line to the point of sale. In Pepsi Company, operations surrounding inventory include documenting the amount of the raw products in the balance sheet, data that is used in manufacturing and production phases (Stoddard, 2002). From 2011 to 2013, there has been a decline in the raw materials that were documented in the balance sheet and the merchandise date. Analysis of the features of the inventory system at Pepsi has also shown that there is a decline in the amount if goods that the company is holding and are available for sale (Visconti, 2012). The features of the inventory management system were different at Proctor and Gamble. The amount of raw material in the company were considered low in as from 2011 to 2013 but increased as from 2013 to 2014. Analysis of the work in process for the company showed that both companies were similar as from 2011 to 2013 but it later reduced in 2013 to 2014 for Proctor and Gamble. The finished goods were able to increase as from 2012 to 2013 but there was a slight decrease 2013 to 2014 (Visconti, 2012). Analysis of design concepts integration for products and services Procter and Gamble provides branded household products to its consumers globally. The company uses membership club stores, among other stores within the neighborhood of the consumers. There are different specifications for products of the company. When observing its products such as Mountain Dew Color, Slice Color Aquafina, Miranda, 7up, and Pepsi, it is possible to observe that all these products are different. This design involves recruitment process that identifies the different tastes and preferences by customers. Through such a process, there is more production, which means that there will be more profits (Stoddard, 2002). The role that inventory plays in the company’s performance, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction There are a number of roles that management of inventory plays in the performance, customer satisfaction, and operational efficiency within a business organization. Through inventory management, it is possible to predict the process due to the need of manning raw materials, before making a decision on scheduling during procession stage. Inventory can be considered as a shock absorber that exists between planning, scheduling, and processing (Muller, 2003). IT is also important to note the importance of the inventory list in estimating the fluctuations in demand for the products that have been manufactured. Even when the inventory manager does not have knowledge on the stock needed at some point in time, it is important to note that the customer has always been satisfied. Such times occur when resources are scarce, which means that the production process is usually slowed. Inventory is an important feature in protection of pricing strategies. This is mainly because, the purchase of the needed material in time is important in reducing the effects caused by inflation. That therefore means that buying material in advance at reasonable prices helps in maintaining prices for goods. The use of inventories by business organizations ensures that a large scale buyer benefits from discounts that have been made available. This is effective since it saves on costs of ordering cost since buying goods in large quantities attracts low prices as compared to buying goods in low quantities. Different types of layouts and their importance to the enterprise manufacturing or service operations Both Proctor and Gamble can be considered to display similar layouts in production cycles. These layouts have been identified as Depth of the product line and Product mix WIDTH. In both layouts, there is variety of aspects such as color taste, consistency, among others that are considered. The importance of these layouts is the improvement in efficiency of space needed in manufacturing, cutting on production delays and general improvement of the quality of products (Muller, 2003). Metrics to evaluate supply chain performance and improvements to the design and operations of the supply chains The first metric used is the categorical system where the buyer is at will to make a choice on the favorable qualities. The categorical system is effective in the aspect that the buyer can assign a rating of their choice based on their experience. This helps in determining the vendor that has highest ratings. Supplier measurement is usually subjective, which creates a big need for independent customers to assign ratings in attaining quantity data (Lambert, 2001). The other used is the evaluation involves being able to select and assign the weight of the attributes due to their importance performance of the company. This is followed by decision from the administration of the company where the weight attained is multiplied by the score of performance and the products totaled. Such calculations reduce subjectivity and are used in making important decisions affecting the company`s operations (Decker, 1999). Improving the inventory management One of the ways used in improving inventory management is the consideration of the optimization tools used in inventory, which enables easy evaluation of the current network in the inventory practices. . The other that can be used in improving inventory management is the employment of business solutions that are based on real-time analytics. This is better as compared to the use of spreadsheet, which means that all operations could be made under one platform. This involves gathering similar data and being able to conduct financial analysis and supply chain decisions that lead to immediate results. The third strategy would be integration of current technology that identifies the use of mobile devices. Mobile devices allow being able to get instant data on inventory management, which helps in making better inventory decisions. Through such improvements, it will be possible to attain the goals and objectives of the organization (Bose, 2006). References Bose, D. C. (2006). Inventory management. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India. Decker, C. L. (1999). Winning with the P&G 99: 99 principles and practices of Procter & Gamble's success. New York: Pocket Books. Lambert, D. and Pohlen, T. (2001). Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12 (1), 1 – 19. Muller, M., & Amacom. (2003). Essentials of inventory management. New York, N.Y: American Management Association. Stoddard, B. (2002). The encyclopedia of Pepsi-Cola collectibles. Iola, WI: Krause Publications. Visconti, L. (2012). Corporate Diversity: How P&G values Drive Innovations. INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 7 Running head: INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 1