nternal
edicine
Middle East Journal of Internal Medicine
ISSN 1837 9052
November 2016
- Volume 9, Issue 3
Chief Editor:
Ahmad Husari
Ethics Editor and Publisher:
Ms Lesley Pocock
medi+WORLD International
Email:
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
Editorial enquiries:
editor@me-jim.com
Advertising enquiries:
lesleypocock@mediworld.com.au
While all efforts have been made
to ensure the accuracy of the
information in this journal,
opinions expressed are those of
the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of
The Publishers, Editor or the
Editorial Board. The publishers,
Editor and Editorial Board cannot
be held responsible for errors or
any consequences arising from
the use of information contained
in this journal; or the views and
opinions expressed.Publication
of any advertisements does not
constitute any endorsement by
the Publishers and Editors of the
product advertised.
2
Editorial
Ahmad Husari
Original Contribution / Clinical Investigation
3
Renoprotective evaluations of different angiotensin inhibitors on Diabetic Nephropathy in Rats
Kawa F. Dizaye, Asmaa A. Ahmed
12
Digital clubbing may be a pioneer sign of cirrhosis in sickle cell patients
Mehmet Rami Helvaci, Orhan Ayyildiz, Orhan Ekrem Muftuoglu,
Lesley Pocock
Community Care
18 Cutaneous Leishmania in Wadi Hadramout, Yemen
S Amer Omer Bin Al-Zou
Ofice Based Medicine
26 Obesity Management in Primary Health Care
Abdulrazak Abyad
The contents of this journal are
copyright. Apart from any fair
dealing for purposes of private
study, research, criticism or
review, as permitted under the
Australian Copyright Act, no part
of this program may be
reproduced without the
permission of the publisher.
FROM THE EDITOR
From the Editor
A paper from Turkey investigated the possibility that t Digital
clubbing may be a pioneer sign of cirrhosis in sickle cell patients. All patients with SCDs were taken into the study. The
study included 397 patients (193 females and 204 males). There
were 36 patients (9.0%) with digital clubbing. The male ratio
was signiicantly higher in the digital clubbing group (66.6%
versus 49.8%, p<0.05). The author concluded that SCDs are
chronic catastrophic processes on endothelium particularly at
the capillary level, and terminate with accelerated atherosclerosis induced end-organ failures in early years of life. Digital
clubbing may show an advanced disease and be a pioneer sign
of cirrhosis in such patients.
Ahmad Husari (Chief Editor)
Email: editor@me-jim.com
This is the last issue this year of the journal. The issue has papers from various countries in the region dealing with various
topics. In addition with this issue we are Introducing the Middle
East Primary Care Quality Improvement program (MEQUIP).
See www.mejfm/MEQUIP/index.htm
A paper from Yemen attempt to describe epidemiological and
clinical features of cutaneous leishmana cases. It was a retrospective descriptive records review of all patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosed at the Seiyun general hospital
from January to December 2013.
A total of 122 patients were diagnosed with cutaneous leishmaniasis. The age of patients ranged between 1 to 62 years
and the mean age is 26.5 ± 18.1 years. Most of the patients
56(45.9%) were of age group less than 20 years. The most
common type of lesions were nodulo-ulcerated 52(42.7%)
followed by nodular 45(36.9%). The distribution of sex, in
which males and females of age group less than 20 years,
were predominant 38 (31.1%) and 18 (14.8%) respectively.
The authors concluded that that Wadi Hadramout is an endemic region of leishmaniasis and our indings will be of
great interest to the public health authorities in Hadramout.
A paper from Iraq was designed to compare the effectiveness
of different angiotensin inhibitors; direct rennin inhibitor (Aliskiren), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (Ramipril)
and angiotensin II receptor blocker (Irbesartan) in prevention
and treatment of nephropathy in a group of rat diabetic nephropathy in rats. Diabetic nephropathic rats showed a signiicant
increase in blood glucose level, blood pressure, heart rate, serum urea, serum creatinine, in addition to deteriorating renal
functions including (urine low, glomerular iltration rate, Na+
and K+ excretion rate, albumin and creatinine in the urine).
The administration of (Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren)
caused a signiicant reduction in blood pressure, blood glucose, serum urea, Na+ and K+ excretion rate, with a signiicant
improvement in urine low and glomerular iltration rate. All
three drugs induced a signiicant elevation in serum K+ concentration. The authors concluded that administration of different angiotensin inhibitors (ramipril, irbesartan, & aliskiren)
could slow the progression of nephropathy in alloxan induced
diabetic rats. Both ramipril and irbesartan have the same renoprotective effects for most parameters.
A review paper form Lebanon looked at obesity Management
in Primary Health Care. The author stressed that Obesity is a
key public health problem across the world. Easy solutions are
unlikely, given the complex interaction between the abundant
availability of energy dense food, the ever decreasing demand
for energy expenditure in the modern world. This review paper
address the issues of overweight and obesity in primary health
care.
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3 NOVEMBER 2016
2
M I D D L E E A S T J O U R N A L O F I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E • VO LU M E 2 , I S S U E 3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N / C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
Renoprotective evaluations of different angiotensin inhibitors on
Diabetic Nephropathy in Rats
Kawa F. Dizaye (1)
Asmaa A. Ahmed (2)
(1) PhD. Head of Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine. Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
(2) MSc. Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Erbil, Iraq
Correspondence:
Prof. Dr. Kawa Dizaye
Professor of Pharmacology
Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
Tel: 009647504452392
Web: hmu.edu.iq
Email: kawa.dizaye@hmu.edu.iq
ABSTRACT
Background: This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of different angiotensin inhibitors; direct renin inhibitor (Aliskiren), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (Ramipril) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (Irbesartan) in prevention and treatment of nephropathy in a group of
rat diabetic nephropathy in rats.
Methods: Thirty rats were divided into two groups. The first group consisted of 6 rats which were
considered as the normal control group. The second group included 24 induced diabetic rats. The diabetic model rats were subdivided into four subgroups of six rats each. The first subgroup served as a
positive control. The second, third and fourth subgroup received Ramipril, Irbesartan and Aliskiren
respectively.
Results: Diabetic nephropathic rats showed a significant increase in blood glucose level, blood pressure, heart rate, serum urea, serum creatinine, in addition to deteriorating renal functions including
(urine flow, glomerular filtration rate, Na+ and K+ excretion rate, albumin and creatinine in the
urine). The administration of (Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren) caused a significant reduction in
blood pressure, blood glucose, serum urea, Na+ and K+ excretion rate, with a significant improvement
in urine flow and glomerular filtration rate. All three drugs induced a significant elevation in serum
K+ concentration.
Conclusion: Administration of different angiotensin inhibitors (ramipril, irbesartan, & aliskiren)
could slow the progression of nephropathy in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Both ramipril and irbesartan have the same renoprotective effects for most parameters.
Key words: Diabetic nephropathy, Aliskiren, Irbesartan, Ramipril
M I D D L E E AOF
S T JINTERNAL
O U R N A L OMEDICINE
F I N T E R N A L VOLUME
M E D I C I N E9 ISSUE
• VO LU3MNOVEMBER
E 2 , I S S U E 3 2016
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL
3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N A N D C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
The animals were maintained on a balanced diet (bread, barley,
carrots, lettuce, milk) and fresh-water supply.
Introduction
Diabetic nephropathy is a major microvascular complication
of diabetes, representing the leading cause of end stage renal
disease in the world. Diabetic nephropathy is characterized
by a progressive increase in urinary albumin excretion
(microalbuminuria) and a decline in glomerular iltration rate
(GFR), which occurs in association with an increase in blood
pressure, ultimately leading to end stage renal disease (1, 2).
Basic and clinical research supports the use of renin angiotensin
aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy
(3, 4, 5).
Several basic and clinical studies, mainly in diabetic patients,
have provided evidence that some antihypertensive agents that
inhibit the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), like
angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), are renoprotective (6,
7). The reno-protection provided by these drugs seems at least
partly independent of BP lowering and related perhaps to the
inhibition of the RAS (8, 9, 10).
Induction of experimental diabetes
Diabetes was induced by a single intraperitoneal injection of
120mg/kg body weight of alloxan dissolved in distilled water
immediately before injection 16. Alloxan treated animals
were allowed to drink 5% of glucose overnight to prevent the
potentially fatal hypoglycemia occurring as a result of massive
insulin release following alloxan injection (17).
Rats showing blood glucose levels above 180 mg/dl were
considered to be diabetic (18) and used for drug treatment.
Experimental design
Thirty rats were divided into ive groups each consisting
of 6 rats in order to study the effect of different angiotensin
inhibitors (Ramipril, Irbesartan, Aliskiren) during the 21 days
study period:
Group I: Normal control rats given D.W
Group II: Control diabetic rats given D.W
Several mechanisms participate in the renal protection afforded
by angiotensin inhibitors. ACEIs increase the permeability
selectivity of the iltering membrane, thereby diminishing
exposure of the mesangium to proteinaceous factors that may
stimulate mesangial cell proliferation and matrix production,
two processes that contribute to expansion of the mesangium
in diabetic nephropathy. Since angiotensin II is a growth factor,
reductions in the intrarenal levels of angiotensin II may further
attenuate mesangial cell growth and matrix production (11, 12,
13).
Group III: Diabetic rats given Ramipril 10mg/kg.
Group IV: Diabetic rats given Irbesartan 10mg/kg.
Group V: Diabetic rats given Aliskiren 10 mg/kg.
The solution of drugs was freshly prepared in normal saline
before administration by an oral gavage every morning.
Collection of samples
1-Urine
Thus, there do not appear to be signiicant differences between
ACEI and ARBs in type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy
based on a small number of comparison studies.
Other studies in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with early
nephropathy comparing ACEIs and ARBs have also failed to
show signiicant differences in the effects of these two drug
classes on BP and urinary albumin excretion (14, 15). Only
a few studies have addressed the question of whether ACE
inhibitors are better than ARBs or vice versa.
This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of
different angiotensin inhibitors, direct renin (DR) inhibitor
(Aliskiren), ACEI (Ramipril) ARBs (Irbesartan) in prevention
and treatment of nephropathy in rat induced diabetes.
Materials and Methods
After 3 days, and at the end of drug treatment, all of the animals
were kept in metabolic cages. Animals were fasted but allowed
free access to water. Urine sample were collected after 24
hours in urine collecting bottles from which the urine collected
was tested for: Albumin, Creatinine, Na+ excretion rate and K+
excretion rate, glomerular iltration rate and others.
2-Blood
At the end of drug treatment, all of the animals were fasted
overnight but allowed free access to water. The next morning,
blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture into a plastic
syringe under a combination of ketamine in a dose of 75 mg/kg
with xylazine in a dose of 10 mg/kg. At 10th day and at the end
of experiment (after 21 days), a 24 hours urine collection was
carried out by using the metabolic cage. The urine was checked
for the albumin and total protein by using Cybow diagnostic
kits (DFI co. Ltd, Gimhae- City, Gyung- Nam, Korea).
Statistical Analysis
Animals
Healthy adult albino rats of both sexes were used in the present
study. Their weight ranged from 250-300 grams. Rats were
grouped and kept in separate animal cages at the animal house
of the College of Medicine under prevailing atmospheric
conditions (room temperature of about 25c).
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard error means
(M ± SEM). The results were evaluated by using the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Version
21) computer program and the differences in all parameters
between diabetic and non-diabetic rats were analyzed by a
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3 NOVEMBER 2016
M I D D L E E A S T J O U R N A L O F I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E • VO LU M E 2 , I S S U E 3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N / C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
one-way analysis of variables (ANOVA). The comparison between groups was done using Duncan test. A change was considered statistically signiicant when P<0.05.
The experiments were carried out with the approval of the ethic
committee of Hawler Medical University/college of Medicine.
Results
Effect of Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren on the blood
pressure and heart rate of diabetic rats.
In alloxan-induced diabetic rats, a signiicant high elevation in
blood pressure was seen when compared to the normal control
group, Table 1. The heart rate of diabetic rats was moderately
higher than that of the normal control. A signiicant reduction
in blood pressure was observed following oral 10 mg/kg administration of all the angiotensin inhibitors (Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren) when compared to the diabetic group.
Table (1).
Ramipril and aliskiren treated group had a signiicant reduction in their heart rate, while irbesartan caused non-signiicant
changes when compared to the diabetic group.
Effect of angiotensin inhibitors on the renal function of
diabetic rats
The urine low of the diabetic rats was signiicantly higher than
the normal control group. Aliskiren caused a signiicant reduction in the urine low when compared to the diabetic rats, while
ramipril, and irbesartan produced a non-signiicant reduction
in the urine low when compared with both groups. While the
glomerular iltration rate (GFR) of diabetic rats was found to
be signiicantly lower than normal rats. Angiotensin inhibitors
(Ramipril, Irbesartan, & Aliskiren) induced a signiicant improvement in the GFR when compared to the diabetic group
Table (2) - next page.
In alloxan-induced diabetic rats there was a marked elevation in
albuminuria when compared to the control animals. Daily oral
administration of angiotensin inhibitors for 21 days caused a
signiicant reduction in albumin excreted through urine when
compared to the diabetic group.
The effect of different angiotensin inhibitors on Na+ concentration in the urine, were non-signiicantly reduced in comparison to the diabetic animals, although the urinary Na+ concentration did not return to the normal value. Table (3). The
Irbesartan treated rats did not show a signiicant improvement
in Na+ excretion rate, while Ramipril and Aliskiren treated
rats induced a signiicant reduction in Na+ excretion rate. As
shown in Table (3) there was a signiicant reduction in Na+
serum concentration level of angiotensin inhibitors treated
rats when compared to the diabetic rats. In comparison to the
diabetic rats, the percentage of Na+ reabsorption in the angiotensin inhibitors treatment groups were non-signiicantly
reduced. Table (3) - next page.
Effect of angiotensin inhibitors on the renal excretion of K+
of the diabetic rats
Following the induction of diabetes by alloxan, there was a reduction in K+ urine concentration accompanied by an increase
in the urinary potassium excretion rate. There was a signiicant elevation in K+ urine concentration in the groups which
received different angiotensin inhibitors in comparison with
diabetic group.
The angiotensin inhibitor treated rats showed a signiicant decrease in the K+ excretion rate in comparison to the diabetic
rats, albeit not reaching the normal range. The serum concentration of K+ was increased signiicantly in diabetic and treated
rats with angiotensin inhibitors when compared to the control
group. Table (4) - page 7.
Table 1: The effects of 10 mg/kg of angiotensin inhibitors on the blood pressure & heart rate of the diabetic rats
* Similar letters indicate no signiicant differences.
* Different letters indicate signiicant differences at P < 0.05.
M I D D L E E AOF
S T JINTERNAL
O U R N A L OMEDICINE
F I N T E R N A L VOLUME
M E D I C I N E9 ISSUE
• VO LU3MNOVEMBER
E 2 , I S S U E 3 2016
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N A N D C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
Table 2: The effects of 10 mg/kg of angiotensin inhibitors on the urine low, GFR, and albuminuria of the diabetic rats
* Similar letters indicate no signiicant differences.
* Different letters indicate signiicant differences at P < 0.05.
Table 3: Effects of angiotensin inhibitors on the renal excretion of Na+ of the diabetic rats
* Similar letters indicate no signiicant differences.
* Different letters indicate signiicant differences at P < 0.05.
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3 NOVEMBER 2016
M I D D L E E A S T J O U R N A L O F I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E • VO LU M E 2 , I S S U E 3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R i B U T I O N / C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
Table 4: Effects of different angiotensin inhibitors on the renal excretion of K+ of the diabetic rats
* Similar letters indicate no signiicant differences.
* Different letters indicate signiicant differences at P < 0.05.
Table 5: Effect of angiotensin inhibitors on the biochemical parameters of the diabetic rats
* Different letters indicate signiicant differences at P < 0.05
Effect of angiotensin inhibitors on the biochemical parameters
(blood glucose, serum urea, & serum creatinine) of the diabetic
rats
Following the treatment of diabetic animals with angiotensin
inhibitors Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren at a dose of 10
mg/kg for 21 days, a signiicant reduction in the blood glucose
and serum urea were noticed when compared to the diabetic
group. The ramipril, irbesartan, and aliskiren did not signiicantly change the serum creatinine in comparison to the diabetic rats. Table (5).
Discussion
Several randomized trials have shown that improved glycemic
control in both type 1 and 2 diabetic patients decreases the risk
of diabetic nephropathy and other complications. Although signiicant improvement in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy
has occurred over the past 25 years, as a result, pharmacological inhibition of the RAS has been proposed as a key strategy
in reducing kidney damage beyond the predicted effects as a
result of blood pressure reduction. (19, 20, 21).
In diabetic rats, a deinite and elevated blood pressure was
seen when compared to the normal control group, while the
heart rate of diabetic rats was moderately higher than that of
the normal group. The result obtained from experiments on
rats through detecting the effect of (Ramipril, Irbesartan, and
Aliskiren) on blood pressure and heart rate, showed that there
was a statistically signiicant decrease in blood pressure with a
non-signiicant decrease in heart rate. Ramipril and irbesartan
were better than aliskiren in decreasing Blood pressure. The
hypotensive effect of different angiotensin inhibitors may be
explained by the vasodilating effects of ACEI on the glomerular
efferent arterioles, where it prevents the Ang-II formation (22).
Inhibition of angiotensin lowers systemic vascular resistance
and blood pressure; this is not surprising when the renal vessels are exceptionally sensitive to the vasoconstrictor actions of
angiotensin II (23). Angiotensin inhibitor increases renal blood
low without increasing GFR; thus reducing the iltration fraction. Both the afferent and efferent arterioles are dilated as well
M I D D L E E AOF
S T JINTERNAL
O U R N A L OMEDICINE
F I N T E R N A L VOLUME
M E D I C I N E9 ISSUE
• VO LU3MNOVEMBER
E 2 , I S S U E 3 2016
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N A N D C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
as causing systemic arteriolar dilatation. ACEI increases the
compliance of large arteries, which contributes to systolic
pressure reduction (24).
The urine low of the diabetic rats was signiicantly higher
than the normal control group, while the glomerular iltration
rate (GFR) of diabetic rats was found to be signiicantly lower
than in the normal rats. In the present study, the result obtained
from the experiment on rats for detecting the effect of different
angiotensin inhibitors (Ramipril, Irbesartan, and Aliskiren)
on urine low and glomerular iltration rate, showed a signiicant improvement in the urine low and GFR. Both ramipril
and irbesartan had a superior renoprotective effect than that of
aliskiren. The renal protection effect of different angiotensin
inhibitors may be explained by ACEI probably attenuating
the progression of renal insuficiency in patients with a variety of nondiabetic nephropathies, and may arrest the decline
in GFR even in patients with severe renal disease (25, 26, 27).
Normally, GFR is slightly reduced by angiotensin II; however,
during renal artery hypotension, the effects of angiotensin II
on the efferent arteriole predominate, leading to increased
renal blood low, hence increasing GFR. Therefore, blockade
of the renin-angiotensin system may cause acute renal failure
in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis and in patients
with unilateral stenosis who have only a single kidney (7). Angiotensin II variably inluences GFR via several mechanisms
such as constricting the afferent arterioles, which reduces intra-glomerular pressure and GFR, or by contracting the mesangial cells, which decreases the capillary surface area within
the available glomerulus which subsequently leads to decrease
GFR, and it could be due to constricting effect on the efferent
arterioles, which increases intra-glomerular pressure which increases GFR (28, 29).
The result of this experiment is in agreement with a study by
Weidmann et al (1995) who concluded that GFR is better preserved in ACEI treated groups (30). Furthermore, Lebovitz et
al (1996) (31) declared that enalapril prevented falling in GFR
in hypertensive patients. However, the result of the present
study does not agree with Kasiske et al (1993) who found that
ACEI is more superior to B blockers in decreasing GFR among
diabetic patients (32). Parving and Rossing (1994)) concluded
that lisinopril has no signiicant effects in decreasing GFR in
diabetic nephropathic patients 33 . Moreover, Barnett et al
(2005) showed that the rate of GFR decrease was equivalent in
both enalapril and telmisartan treated patients (34).
In the present study a marked elevation in albuminuria was seen
in diabetic rats. Increased glomerular pressure associated with
diabetes can be enhanced by aII-mediated constriction of the
glomerular arterioles, causing further elevation in microcirculatory pressure within the glomerulus, and leading to excretion
of albumin, and thus to the development of microalbuminuria and proteinuria (35). While after the oral administration of
(ramipril, irbesartan and aliskiren) a signiicant reduction in
urinary albumin was noticed. In addition, both ramipril and
irbesartan better reduced the albumin in the urine. This result
is in agreement with studies conducted by Chan et al (2000),
and Jerums et al (2001) who reported that treatment with ACEI
& aliskiren decrease albumin excretion rate (36, 37).
Studies in streptozotocin diabetic rats have demonstrated that
both AIIB and ACEi blocked the development of hypertension
and signiicantly decreased albuminuria 38. Whereas in the
DETAIL (Diabetic exposed to telmisartam and enalapril) study
there were no signiicant differences in albumin excretion rate
in both enalapril and telmisartan treated patients (34).
Several mechanisms have been suggested for antiproteinuric
effects of RAS inhibition. First, it may be related to a reduction in intraglomerular blood pressure independently of systemic blood pressure by vasodilatation preferentially of the
postglomerular arterioles (39). Second, RAS inhibition may
improve the charge and size selectivity of the glomerular membrane (40), which may be related, in part, to reduced loss of
glomerular nephrin, which has been suggested to play a central
role in the function of the glomerular iltration barrier (41).
The administration of both ramipril and aliskiren induced a
signiicant change in Na+ excretion rate, while irbesartan did
not show any signiicant improvement in diabetic rats. On the
other hand the effect of ramipril, irbesartan, and aliskiren on
the Na+ concentration in the urine was non-signiicant.
There was a non - signiicant reduction in the level of serum
Na+ concentration in all treated rats. The percentage of Na+
reabsorption in the angiotensin inhibitor treatment group was
non - signiicantly reduced but still lower than the control
group.
However, it has been suggested that angiotensin II can act presynaptically to potentiate the release of norepinephrine from
sympathetic nerve terminals and thus enhancing the renin release from the renal tubule (42, 43). The rise in sodium level
in diabetic rats could be related to the fact that angiotensin II
stimulates the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex to increase the synthesis and secretion of aldosterone which acts on
the distal and collecting tubules to cause retention of Na+ and
excretion of K+ and H+. The stimulant effect of angiotensin II
on aldosterone synthesis and release is enhanced under conditions of hyponatremia or hyperkalemia and reduced when
concentrations of Na+ and K+ in plasma are altered in the opposite directions (44). Very low concentrations of angiotensin
II stimulate Na+/H+ exchange in the proximal tubule; an effect
that increases Na+, Cl-, and angiotensin II may reduce Na+
excretion in part by diminishing medullary blood low.
In the present study, the signiicant decrease in the K+ excretion rate accompanied by a non-signiicant rise in the serum
K+ level were detected following administration of ramipril,
irbesartan, and aliskiren. These effects could be explained by
suppression of endogenous aldosterone and worsening kidney
function (45). Despite some reduction in the concentration of
aldosterone, signiicant K+ retention is rarely encountered in
patients with normal renal function who have not been taking
other drugs that cause K+ retention (46).
In this study, the level of blood glucose in diabetic rats was signiicantly increased when compared to the control group. This
result in accordance with studies of Bilal et al (1998), Azuma
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3 NOVEMBER 2016
M I D D L E E A S T J O U R N A L O F I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E • VO LU M E 2 , I S S U E 3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R i B U T I O N / C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
et al (2007) who suggested that elevated blood glucose levels
in diabetes are caused by a defect in production and or secretion of the hormone insulin (47, 48). In this study the elevation
of blood glucose level indicate that this effect is caused by the
direct inluence of alloxan on pancreatic beta cells.
3- Koike H. New pharmacologic aspects of CS-866, the newest
angiotensin II receptor antagonist. The American journal of
cardiology. 2001;87(8):33-6.
Treatment with angiotensin inhibitors Ramipril, Irbesartan,
and Aliskiren caused a signiicant reduction in the blood glucose level of diabetic rats. However, aliskiren was better in reducing blood glucose than the other two drugs.
4- Koike H, Sada T, Mizuno M. In vitro and in vivo pharmacology of olmesartan medoxomil, an angiotensin II type AT1
receptor antagonist. Journal of hypertension Supplement: oficial journal of the International Society of Hypertension.
2001;19(1):S3-14.
In this study the hypoglycemic effect of angiotensin inhibitors
may be due to increased rate of glucose uptake into the cell,
and to improve glucose metabolism (49, 50). Clariication of
the mechanism of this effect is in progress. In patients with essential hypertension, plasma insulin and blood glucose levels
increase together, indicating reduced insulin sensitivity. Because of this, even without the onset of diabetes, a latent rise in
blood glucose level may be seen. Angiotensin receptor blocker
and ACEI can improve glucose metabolism via blocking the
inhibitory effect of angiotensin II on insulin signal transmission (51, 52). On the other hand, the vasodilatory action of
angiotensin inhibitor may increase the access of insulin and
glucose to the skeletal muscle tissue, the main site of insulinmediated removal of glucose 53. The result of hypoglycemic
effects of ramipril, irbesartan, and aliskiren in the diabetic
rats is in agreement with other studies done by Jacobsen et al
(2003), Lau et al (2004), Dizaye and Rashid (2009) (54, 55, 56).
Subsequent studies indicated that telmisartan also suppressed
the new onset of diabetes (53).
In the present study ramiprl, irbesartan, and aliskiren did not
signiicantly decrease serum creatinine, and this effect was
compatible with the inding of Lewis et al (2001) who suggested that the level of serum creatinine was not signiicantly
changed by irbesartan in nephropathic patients (21). Along
the same lines, are the data from other studies which showed
that serum creatinine levels did not signiicantly change in the
ACEI group (57, 58). However, the result of this study was in
disagreement with the study of Brenner et al (2001), who found
that there was 25% reduction for doubling the serum creatinine
level after using ACEi (20).
Conclusion
Administration of different angiotensin inhibitors (ramipril,
irbesartan, and aliskiren) could slow the progression of nephropathy in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Both ramipril and
irbesartan had the same renoprotective effects for most parameters.
References
1. Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, Arbogast PG, Dudley JA,
Dyer S, Gideon PS, et al. Major congenital malformations after
irst-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;354(23):2443-51.
2. Caramori ML, Mauer M. Diabetes and nephropathy. Current
opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2003;12(3):273-82.
5- Mizuno M, Sada T, Kato M, Koike H. Renoprotective effects
of blockade of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in an animal model
of type 2 diabetes. Hypertension Research. 2002;25(2):271-8.
6- Remuzzi G, Schieppati A, Ruggenenti P. Nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine.
2002;346(15):1145-51.
7- Jafar TH, Schmid CH, Landa M, Giatras I, Toto R, Remuzzi
G, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of patient-level data. Annals of internal medicine. 2001;135 (2):7387.
8- Brenner G, Stevens C. Pharmacology. Fourth eddition.
Saunders, Elsevier publisher: 2013. P. 96.
9- Parving H-H, Lehnert H, Bröchner-Mortensen J, Gomis R,
Andersen S, Arner P. The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345 (12):870-8.
10- Valderrabano F, Berthoux FC, Jones EH, Mehls O. Report on management of renal failure in Europe, XXV, 1994
end stage renal disease and dialysis report. Population. 1996;52
(65):62.
11- Salvetti A, Mattei P, Sudano I. Renal protection and antihypertensive drugs. Drugs. 1999;57(5):665-93.
12- Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor EL, Scheidt-Nave C, McPhillips JB. Prevalence of cardiovascular and renal complications in older adults with normal or impaired glucose tolerance or NIDDM: a population-based study. Diabetes Care.
1993;16(7):1022-5.
13- Mann JF, Gerstein HC, Pogue J, Bosch J, Yusuf S. Renal
insuficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and the
impact of ramipril: the HOPE randomized trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2001;134(8):629-36.
14- Lacourcière Y, Bélanger A, Godin C, Hallé J-P, Ross S,
Wright N, et al. Long-term comparison of losartan and enalapril on kidney function in hypertensive type 2 diabetics with
early nephropathy. Kidney international. 2000;58(2):762-9.
15- Mogensen CE, Neldam S, Tikkanen I, Oren S, Viskoper
R, Watts RW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system in patients with hypertension,
microalbuminuria, and non-insulin dependent diabetes: the
candesartan and lisinopril microalbuminuria (CALM) study.
Bmj. 2000;321(7274):1440-4.
16- Sultan AH, Dizaye KF, Banna HB. Histological, Immunocytochemical and Biochemical study of the effect of Adiantum
capillus on alloxan induced diabetic rats.
M I D D L E E AOF
S T JINTERNAL
O U R N A L OMEDICINE
F I N T E R N A L VOLUME
M E D I C I N E9 ISSUE
• VO LU3MNOVEMBER
E 2 , I S S U E 3 2016
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL
O R I G I N A L CO N T R I B U T I O N A N D C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
17- Kumar GPS, Arulselvan P, Kumar DS, Subramanian SP.
Anti-diabetic activity of fruits of Terminalia chebula on streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Journal of health science.
2006;52(3):283-91.
18- Nair R, Shukla V, Chanda S. Assessment of Polyalthia
longifolia var. pendula for hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic activity. J Clin Diagn Res. 2007;1:1-3.
19-Rao RP, Jain A, Srinivasan B. Dual therapy versus monotherapy of trandolapril and telmisartan on diabetic nephropathy
in experimentally induced type 2 diabetes mellitus rats. Journal
of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System. 2011;12(3):169-75.
20- Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch
WE, Parving H-H, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345(12):8619.
21- Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA,
Lewis JB, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy
due to type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine.
2001;345(12):851-60.
22- Lansang MC, Price DA, Laffel LM, Osei SY, Fisher ND,
Erani D, et al. Renal vascular responses to captopril and to
candesartan in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Kidney
international. 2001;59(4):1432-8
23- Brunton LL, Chabner B, Knollmann BC. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics: McGraw-Hill
Medical New York; 2011. 806
24- Cherney DZ, Scholey JW, Jiang S, Har R, Lai V, Sochett
EB, et al. The effect of direct renin inhibition alone and in combination with ACE inhibition on endothelial function, arterial
stiffness, and renal function in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes care.
2012;35(11):2324-30.
25- Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, Locatelli F, Mann JF, Motolese M, et al. Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme
inhibitor benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insuficiency. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(15):93945.
26- Kshirsagar AV, Joy MS, Hogan SL, Falk RJ, Colindres RE.
Effect of ACE inhibitors in diabetic and nondiabetic chronic
renal disease: a systematic overview of randomized placebo-controlled trials. American journal of kidney diseases.
2000;35(4):695-707.
27- Praga M, Gutiérrez E, González E, Morales E, Hernández
E. Treatment of IgA nephropathy with ACE inhibitors: a randomized and controlled trial. Journal of the American Society
of Nephrology. 2003;14(6):1578-83.
28- Pelayo JC, Ziegler MG, Blantz RC. Angiotensin II in adrenergic-induced alterations in glomerular hemodynamics. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. 1984;247(5):
F799-F807.
29- Rang HP, Ritter JM, Flower RJ, Henderson G. Rang &
Dale’s Pharmacology: With student consult online access: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. P=358
30- Weidmann P, Schneider M, Böhlen L. Therapeutic eficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in human diabetic
nephropathy: an updated meta-analysis. Nephrology, dialysis,
transplantation. 1995;10:39-45.
31- Lebovitz HE, Wiegmann TB, Cnaan A, Shahinfar S, Sica
DA, Broadstone V, et al. Renal protective effects of enalapril
in hypertensive NIDDM: role of baseline albuminuria. Kidney
International Supplement. 1994(45).
32- Kasiske BL, Kalil RS, Ma JZ, Liao M, Keane WF. Effect
of antihypertensive therapy on the kidney in patients with diabetes: a meta-regression analysis. Annals of internal medicine.
1993;118(2):129-38.
33- Parving H-H, Rossing P. The use of antihypertensive agents
in prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Current
opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 1994;3(3):292-300.
34- Barnett AH, Bain SC, Bouter P, Karlberg B, Madsbad S,
Jervell J, et al. Angiotensin-receptor blockade versus converting-enzyme inhibition in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;351(19):1952-61.
35- Kunz R, Friedrich C, Wolbers M, Mann JF. Meta-analysis:
effect of monotherapy and combination therapy with inhibitors
of the renin-angiotensin system on proteinuria in renal disease.
Annals of internal medicine. 2008;148(1):30-48.
36- Chan JC, Ko GT, Leung DH, Cheung RC, Cheung MY,
So W-Y, et al. Long-term effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and metabolic control in hypertensive type 2
diabetic patients. Kidney international. 2000;57(2):590-600.
37- Jerums G, Allen TJ, Campbell DJ, Cooper ME, Gilbert RE,
Hammond JJ, et al. Long-term comparison between perindopril
and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes
and microalbuminuria. American journal of kidney diseases.
2001;37(5):890-9.
38- Sano T, Kawamura T, Matsumae H, Sasaki H, Nakayama M, Hara T, et al. Effects of long-term enalapril treatment
on persistent microalbuminuria in well-controlled hypertensive and normotensive NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care.
1994;17(5):420-4.
39- Imanishi M, Yoshioka K, Konishi Y, Okumura M, Okada N, Sato T, et al. Glomerular hypertension as one cause
of albuminuria in type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia.
1999;42(8):999-1005.
40-Andersen S, Tarnow L, Rossing P, Hansen BV, Parving HH. Renoprotective effects of angiotensin II receptor blockade
in type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Kidney
international. 2000;57(2):601-6.
41- Bonnet F, Cooper ME, Kawachi H, Allen TJ, Boner G, Cao
Z. Irbesartan normalises the deiciency in glomerular nephrin
expression in a model of diabetes and hypertension. Diabetologia. 2001;44(7):874-7.
42- Suzuki Y, Matsumura Y, Egi Y, Morimoto S. Effects of
Losartan, a nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on
norepinephrine overlow and antidiuresis induced by stimulation of renal nerves in anesthetized dogs. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 1992;263(3):956-63.
43- Takishita S, Muratani H, Sesoko S, Teruya H, Tozawa M,
Fukiyama K, et al. Short-term effects of angiotensin II blockade on renal blood low and sympathetic activity in awake rats.
Hypertension. 1994;24(4):445-50.
44- Bautista R, Manning R, Martinez F, del Carmen AvilaCasado M, Soto V, Medina A, et al. Angiotensin II-dependent
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE VOLUME 9 ISSUE 3 NOVEMBER 2016
0
M I D D L E E A S T J O U R N A L O F I N T E R N A L M E D I C I N E • VO LU M E 2 , I S S U E 3
O R I G I N A L CO N T R i B U T I O N / C L I N I C A L I N V E S T I G AT I O N
increased expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter in hypertension. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology.
2004;286(1):F127-F33.
45- Weir R, McMurray JJ, Puu M, Solomon SD, Olofsson B,
Granger CB, et al. Eficacy and tolerability of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with heart failure already
receiving an angiotensin-converting inhibitor plus aldosterone
antagonist, with or without a beta blocker. Findings from the
Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in
Mortality and morbidity (CHARM)-Added trial. European
journal of heart failure. 2008;10(2):157-63.
46- Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both
in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med.
2008;2008(358):1547-59.
47- ÜSTÜNDA B, Mehmet Ç, ÖZERCAN IH, NAZIROGLU
M, ILHAN N. Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Activity in
the Serum, Lung, Liver and Kidney in Streptozotocin-Induced
Diabetic Rats and Diabetic Nephropathy. Turkish Journal of
Medical Sciences. 1998;28(3):231-8.
56- Dizaye K, Rashid BZ. Effects of Ramipril on glycosylated
hemoglobin and liver function tests in hypertensive patients.
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE.
2009.
57- Ravid M, Savin H, Jutrin I, Bental T, Katz B, Lishner
M. Long-term stabilizing effect of angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibition on plasma creatinine and on proteinuria
in normotensive type II diabetic patients. Annals of Internal
Medicine. 1993;118(8):577-81.
58- Mann JF, Gerstein HC, Yi Q-L, Franke J, Lonn EM,
Hoogwerf BJ, et al. Progression of renal insuficiency in
type 2 diabetes with and without microalbuminuria: results
of the Heart Outcomes and Prevention Evaluation (HOPE)
randomized study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases.
2003;42(5):936-42.
48- Azuma K, Minami Y, Ippoushi K, Terao J. Lowering effects of onion intake on oxidative stress biomarkers in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Journal of clinical biochemistry
and nutrition. 2007;40(2):131-40.
49- Folli F, Kahn CR, Hansen H, Bouchie JL, Feener EP. Angiotensin II inhibits insulin signaling in aortic smooth muscle
cells at multiple levels. A potential role for serine phosphorylation in insulin/angiotensin II crosstalk. Journal of Clinical
Investigation. 1997;100(9):2158.
50- Folli F, Saad M, Velloso L, Hansen H, Carandente O,
Feener E, et al. Crosstalk between insulin and angiotensin II
signalling systems. Experimental and clinical endocrinology
& diabetes. 1999;107(02):133-9.
51- Furuhashi M, Ura N, Higashiura K, Murakami H, Tanaka
M, Moniwa N, et al. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system
increases adiponectin concentrations in patients with essential
hypertension. Hypertension. 2003;42(1):76-81.
52- Fujimoto M, Masuzaki H, Tanaka T, Yasue S, Tomita T,
Okazawa K, et al. An angiotensin II AT 1 receptor antagonist,
telmisartan augments glucose uptake and GLUT4 protein expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. FEBS letters. 2004;576(3):4927.
53- Ridker PM, Gaboury CL, Conlin PR, Seely EW, Williams GH, Vaughan DE. Stimulation of plasminogen activator
inhibitor in vivo by infusion of angiotensin II. Evidence of a
potential interaction between the renin-angiotensin system
and ibrinolytic function. Circulation. 1993;87(6):1969-73.
54- Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Jensen BR, Parving H-H. Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor
blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
2003;14(4):992-9.
55- Lau T, Carlsson P-O, Leung P. Evidence for a local
angiotensin-generating system and dose-dependent inhibition of glucose-stimulated insulin release by angiotensin II in
isolated pancreatic islets. Diabetologia. 2004;47(2):240-8.
M I D D L E E AOF
S T JINTERNAL
O U R N A L OMEDICINE
F I N T E R N A L VOLUME
M E D I C I N E9 ISSUE
• VO LU3MNOVEMBER
E 2 , I S S U E 3 2016
MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL