Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Gendering the Environment : Ecofeminist Perspectives We are in the midst of an epic contest-the contest between the rights of Mother Earth and the rights of corporations and militarized states using obsolete worldviews and paradigms to accelerate the war against the planet and people. Vandana Shiva & Maria Mies Ecofeminism (p.xix) This paper begins with a message that might sound familiar with anyone in touch with the current call: the ‘‘greening’’ of social and political life: the environment is in a mess and the catastrophe is so immense that it is felt within the most intimate and sacred spaces of the world: the family. Within this climate chaos, women, the keepers of family safety and the doers of family work, are basically aware of the ecological disaster. Such profound consciousness designs women as the vanguard mouthpieces of environmental malaise and also as the leaders of ecological revolution to heal the earth. Indeed, women’s concern about the environment has its roots in the particular problems that women encounter in their private households. The environment becomes an important issue when it influences the security of the personal realm, the home, the family. The personal here starts to be political that is significantly turned into private acts. Being, for example, as governors of family consumption, women can change their families’ buying habits into an environmental contest as to preserve the planet but without leaving the private realm. The female mother consumer is often urged through massive advertising to purchase green products in order to save the planet for future generations. But are not women in their private households more environmentally active and conscious? Such motherhood consciousness Rachel Carson (one of the first American women biologist and author of Silent Spring (1962) prefers to call it motherhood environmentalism. It is one of the ways by which women are considered as having specific relations as a group, to ecological consciousness and action. It highlights women’s concerns about nature and about the health of their children. Within this formula of motherhood environmentalism women are cast as caretakers and nurturers, of their families, their communities, and by extension, the earth. Women do not seek nature; environmental degradation finds them. Rachel Carson watches the birds die, Lois Gibbs (an American environmental activist) learns that her home (near Niagara Falls in upstate New York) was built on a top of toxic waste dump. The women of India hug trees to keep a timber businessman from cutting them down. This foregrounding of women to the front of environmental discourse clumsily integrates women’s issues and environmental concerns. Too often, women and nature are marginalized entities subject to the much stronger force of patriarchal capitalism. Undoubtedly, modern environmentalism has had a complicated relationship with gender. From Rachel Carson onward, strong and independent women have featured prominently. Iconic figures like Lois Gibbs, Erin Brockovitch (an American legal clerk and environmental activist who built a case against the Pacific Gas and Electric Company of California in 1993despite her lack of formal education in law) who demanded corporate compensation despite the efforts to silence them, and were among the first to bring environmental issues into the public sphere. This raises an important question: is environmental discourse heavily gendered? The reminder of this paper attempts to explore the gendered relation to nature as conveyed within ecofeminist theory. Not only the fact that nature is an important element in environmental discourse, but gender is an important element in the social and political creation of nature. As a discourse born of feminist politics (particularly during the 1970s) and somewhat different from motherhood environmentalism, ecofeminism, one would think, is deeply rooted in this societal link between women and nature and that both of them were subject to oppression by patriarchy. Ecofeminism remains a political agenda that is seen as an innovative response to contemporary relations of dominations, a force with which to negotiate a new era of gendered and natured relations. Broadly speaking, ecofeminism is a movement that attempts to link feminist struggles with ecological struggles. About this Vandana Shiva and Maria Mies—two prominent ecofeminist thinkers state: Ecofeminism is about connectedness and wholeness of theory and practice. It asserts the special strength and integrity of every living thing. For us the snail darter is to be considered side by side with a community’s need for water; the porpoise side by side with appetite for tuna, and the creatures it may fall on with Skylab. We are a woman-identified movement and we believe we have a special work to do in these imperilled times. We see the devastation of the earth and her beings by the corporate warriors, and the threat for nuclear annihilation by the military warriors, as feminist concerns. It is the same masculinist mentality which would deny us our right to our bodies and our own sexuality, and which depends on multiple systems of dominance and state power to have its way. Ecofeminism, (p. 14) Women have typically been associated with nature and whenever there is an ecological crisis that humanity faces: massive amounts of pollution, trash, deforestation—women were the ones to take the initiative to solve this ecological crisis to heal the earth. Is then this connection between women and nature historically justified? In the ecofeminist agenda, such conflation of women with nature has historical origins. In Plato’s concept of immaterial soul and ultimate enlightenement involves transcending the Earth and reaching the heavenly realms, but women are incapable of this type of Enlightenement. Plato outlines this in Timaeus stating that if man fails to achieve enlightenment then he will return