&
(19)
(11)
EP 1 553 437 B1
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
(12)
(45) Date of publication and mention
(51) Int Cl.:
G02B 26/08 (2006.01)
of the grant of the patent:
21.02.2007 Bulletin 2007/08
G03B 21/28 (2006.01)
(21) Application number: 05000599.0
(22) Date of filing: 03.08.2001
(54) Singulated wafer die having micromirrors
Vereinzelte Die-Wafer mit Mikrospiegeln
Puces nues séparées à micro-miroirs
(84) Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU
MC NL PT SE TR
(30) Priority: 03.08.2000 US 631536
30.08.2000 US 229246 P
07.12.2000 US 732445
(43) Date of publication of application:
13.07.2005 Bulletin 2005/28
• Ilkov, Fedor
Santa Clara
CA 95051 (US)
• Patel, Satyadev
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 (US)
• Richards, Peter W.
Menlo Park
CA 94025 (US)
• Stockton, John
Pasadena
CA 91106 (US)
(62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in
accordance with Art. 76 EPC:
01959466.2 / 1 315 993
(73) Proprietor: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
INCORPORATED
Dallas, TX 75265 (US)
(74) Representative: Degwert, Hartmut et al
Prinz & Partner GbR
Rundfunkplatz 2
80335 München (DE)
(56) References cited:
US-A- 5 696 619
US-A- 5 758 941
(72) Inventors:
EP 1 553 437 B1
• Huibers, Andrew G.
Mountain View
CA 94041 (US)
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give
notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in
a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art.
99(1) European Patent Convention).
Printed by Jouve, 75001 PARIS (FR)
1
EP 1 553 437 B1
Description
[0001] The present invention relates to movable micromirrors and micromirror arrays for, e.g., projection displays. U.S. Patents 5,835,256 and 6,046,840 and U.S.
Patent Application 09/617,419 disclose micro-electromechanical devices (MEMS) for steering light beams,
such as in an optical switch, and/or for a display (e.g., a
projection display). A common feature is a micromirror
element that is movable so as to deflect light through
different angles, depending upon the micromirror element’s tilt angle. In one type of conventional direct view
or projection display system, an array of reflective micromirror elements is provided for producing an image. Typically the micromirror elements are square and have either a single tilt angle for the ’on’ state and are flat for the
off state, or the same tilt angles for ’on’ and ’off’ states
but opposite sign.
[0002] US 5,696,619 shows an electrically addressable, integrated, monolithic, micro-mirror device which is
formed by the utilization of sputtering techniques, including various metal and oxide layers, photoresists, liquid
and plasma etching, plasma stripping and related techniques and materials. The device includes a selectively
electrostatically deflectable mass or mirror of supported
by one or more beams formed by sputtering and selective
etching. The beams are improved by being constituted
of an impurity laden titanium-tungsten layer with an impurity such as nitrogen, which causes the beams to have
lattice constant different from TiW. The improved beams
exhibit increased strength, and decreased relaxation and
creep.
[0003] US 5,758,941 shows a pixel compensated electro-optical display system utilizing a pixel compensator
to correct image problems. The pixel compensator comprises pixels having elongated geometric shapes that
compensate for distortions normally occuring in optical
systems utilizing one or more reflective surfaces. The
pixels are configured so that when the image plane is
viewed at a particular angle, the image is substantial corrected without complex optical refiguring. The pixel compensated electro-optical display system of the present
invention accordingly minimizes the need to correct the
reflected image. The optical system of the present invention finds utility in applications that require a reflected
image because of spatial and other constrictions. The
optical system of the present invention finds particular
application in vehicle "heads up" display systems as well
as in virtual reality and total immersion display systems.
[0004] In order to minimize light diffraction along the
direction of switching and in particular light diffraction into
the acceptance cone of the collection optics, in the
present invention, micromirrors are provided which are
not rectangular ("rectangular" as used herein including
square micromirrors). Diffraction as referred to herein,
denotes the scattering of light off of a periodic structure,
where the light is not necessarily monochromatic or
phase coherent. Also, in order to minimize the cost of the
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
2
2
illumination optics and the size of the display unit of the
present invention, the light source is placed orthogonal
to the rows (or columns) of the array, and/or the light
source is placed orthogonal to a side of the frame defining
the active area of the array. The incident light beam,
though orthogonal to the rows (or columns) and/or side
of the active area, should not, however, be orthogonal to
sides of the individual micromirrors in the array. Orthogonal sides cause incident light to diffract along the direction of micromirror switching, and result in light ’leakage’
into the ’on’ state even if the micromirror is in the ’off’
state. This light diffraction decreases the contrast ratio
of the micromirror.
[0005] The present invention optimizes the contrast ratio of the micromirror array so that when micromirrors are
in their ’off’ state they send minimal light to the spatial
region where light is directed when micromirrors are in
their ’on’ state. More specifically, the present invention
comprises a particularly located light source and incident
light beam and particularly designed micromirrors in the
array, which minimize light diffracted into the acceptance
cone of the projection (or viewing) optics, so as to provide
an improved contrast ratio. The arrangement and design
of the present invention also minimizes non-reflective areas in the array, by allowing for a tight fit of micromirrors
and a large fill factor with low diffraction from the ’off’ to
the ’on’ state, even when the array is illuminated along
the axes of micromirror periodicity. Namely, the design
optimizes contrast ratio through angular sides non-parallel to the micromirror’s axis of rotation and optimizes
fill factor through hinges that require a relatively small
amount of area and allow neighboring micromirrors to
tile together with little wasted non-reflective area. The
micromirror structures and shapes of various examples
of the invention also decrease cross talk between adjacent micromirrors when the micromirrors are deflected
electrostatically.
[0006] Another aspect of the invention is a micromirror
array where the individual micromirrors tilt asymetrically
around a flat or non-deflected state. By making the ’off’
state of the micromirrors at an angle less than the opposite angle of the micromirrors in the ’on’ state, a) diffracted
light from the edges of the micromirrors that enters the
collection optics is minimized, b) and light that is scattered
from beneath the micromirrors that enters the collection
optics is also minimized, c) travel of the micromirrors is
decreased thus minimizing the possibility of adjacent micromirrors hitting each other, which in turn allows for reducing the gap between micromirrors and increasing fill
factor of the micromirror array, and d) the angle of deflection of the micromirrors can be increased to a greater
extent than micromirror array arrangements with the
same angle of deflection for the on and off states.
[0007] Another aspect of the invention is an array of
pivotable micromirrors, each micromirror having a pivot
axis, and each micromirror having one or more elongated
sides that extend at an angle of less than 45 degrees to
the pivot axis. Preferably, the angle is from 30 to 42.5
3
EP 1 553 437 B1
degrees.
[0008] Another aspect of the invention is an array of
movable micromirrors, each micromirror having four or
more sides, wherein two of the sides come together at
an angle of less than 90 degrees. The angle preferably
is from 45 to 85 degrees.
[0009] Another aspect of the invention is a package
for the micromirror array that has a light transmissive
portion of the package that is not parallel with the substrate upon which the micromirrors are formed. The light
transmissive portion can be any suitable material such
as a plate of glass, quartz or polymer, and allows for
directing specular reflection from the light transmissive
substrate in directions other than those that result from
a parallel light transmissive plate in the packaging. Preferably the specular reflection is directed sufficiently far
from the collection optics so that an increase in the size
of the illumination cone will keep the specular reflection
from entering the collection optics.
[0010] A further aspect of the invention is a projection
system, comprising an array of active micromirrors disposed in a rectangular shape, the micromirrors capable
of rotation around a switching axis between an off-state
and an on-state, the micromirrors corresponding to pixels
in a viewed image; a light source for directing light to the
array of micromirrors, the light source disposed so as to
direct light non-perpendicular to at least two sides of each
micromirror, and parallel, when viewed as a top view of
each micromirror, to at least two other sides of each micromirror; and collection optics disposed to receive light
from micromirrors in an on-state.
[0011] Another aspect of the invention is a projection
system, comprising an array of micromirrors, each micromirror corresponding to a pixel in a viewed image and
having a shape of a concave polygon or one or more
non-rectangular parallelograms; a light source for directing light to the array of micromirrors collection optics disposed to receive light reflected from the micromirrors.
[0012] Yet another aspect of the invention is a projection system comprising a light source for providing an
incident light beam, an array of movable reflective elements, and collection optics for projecting light from the
array, wherein an image projected from the projection
system will appear on a target as a rectangular image,
with the image being formed of from thousands to millions
of pixels, each pixel being in the shape of a concave
polygon, a single non-rectangular parallelogram, or an
assembly of non-rectangular parallelograms.
[0013] Still another aspect of the invention is a projection system comprising a light source, an array of movable micromirror elements, and collection optics, wherein
each micromirror element in the array has a switching
axis substantially parallel to at least one side of the active
area of the array, and at an angle of from 35 to 60 degrees
to one or more sides of the micro-mirror element.
[0014] Another aspect of the invention is a projection
system comprising a light source and an array of movable
micromirror elements, each micromirror element having
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
3
4
a leading side that is non-perpendicular to the incident
light beam, and non-perpendicular to any side of the active area, so as to achieve an increase of 2 to 10 times
the contrast ratio compared to micro-mirror elements
having perpendicular sides to the incident light beam.
[0015] Another aspect of the invention is a projection
system comprising a light source, collection optics, and
an array of movable micromirror elements, the projection
system having a diffraction pattern substantially the same
as that illustrated in Fig. 21C.
[0016] Yet another aspect of the invention is a projection system comprising a light source and a rectangular
array of movable micromirrors, the micromirrors capable
of moving between an on-state and an off-state and capable of reflecting light in the on-state to a predetermined
spatial area, wherein the light source is disposed to direct
light at a substantially 90 degree angle to at least one
side of the rectangle defined by the array, and wherein
substantially no diffracted light enters the predetermined
spatial area when the micromirrors are in the off-state.
[0017] Another aspect of the invention is a method for
projecting an image on a target comprising: directing a
light beam onto a rectangular array of micromirrors, the
light beam directed to the leading side of the rectangular
array at an angle within a range of 90 degrees plus or
minus 40 degrees, and wherein the micromirrors in the
array are shaped as polygons and positioned such that
the light beam is incident on all of the polygonal sides at
angles other than 90 degrees; and projecting the light
from the micromirrors onto a target so as to form an image
thereon.
[0018] Another part of the invention is a projection system comprising a light source, light collection optics and
an array of micromirrors disposed to spatially modulate
a light beam from the light source, the array formed on
a substrate and constructed so that each micromirror is
capable of being in a first position when not actuated,
each micromirror being capable of movement to an on
position that directs light to light collection optics for the
array, and capable of movement in an opposite direction
to an off position for directing light away from the light
collection optics, both said on and off positions being
different from said first position, and wherein the on position is at an angle relative to the first position different
from the off position.
[0019] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the projection system is part of an array of micromirrors
in a projection display. The micromirrors preferably are
disposed on a semiconductor or light transmissive substrate. The substrate preferably is a silicon substrate having circuitry and electrodes for moving the micromirror.
One electrode preferably is provided for electrostatically
moving the micromirror to an on position and another
electrode is provided for electrostatically moving the micromirror to an off position relative to a non-deflected
position. The on and off positions of the micromirrors preferably are different from each other by more than 1 degree. The micromirrors preferably are capable of rotating
5
EP 1 553 437 B1
at least +12 degrees to the on position, and are capable
of rotating in an opposite direction between -4 to -10 degrees. The projection system preferably is a front or rear
screen projection television or computer monitor. The micromirrors preferably are constructed so as to rotate
around an axis from said first position in order to arrive
at said on or said off position. The micromirrors preferably
are constructed so as rotate around a single axis. The
collection optics preferably is a single lens or group of
lenses for all the micromirrors. The micromirrors preferably are digitally addressed. The micromirrors preferably
achieve grayscale by pulse width modulation. The projection system preferably further comprises a target upon
which light from the collection optics is incident. The light
source preferably is an arc lamp. The on and off positions
preferably are defined by structure against which the micromirrors impinge. The projection system preferably further comprises a screen upon which the pattern of on
and off micromirrors is incident. The projection system
preferably further comprises a color filter for providing a
series of sequential colors onto the micromirror array.
The projection system preferably further comprises a device for improving the evenness of light distribution onto
the array. The collection optics preferably is a plurality of
lenses disposed so as to project the pattern of light from
the micromirror array onto a target. The projection system
preferably further comprises one or more micromirrors
or lenses for directing and focusing a cone of light onto
the micro-mirror array. Preferably the projection system
is a front or rear projection display. Preferably the projection system is a mask projector for maskless patterning of a light sensitive material. Preferably the projection
system is a projector in a photolithography system. The
micromirrors preferably are capable of rotation in one
direction relative to the substrate to an on position, and
in an opposite direction relative to the substrate to an off
position. The circuitry and electrodes preferably are
formed on the same substrate as the micromirrors. The
circuitry and electrodes preferably are formed on a second substrate that is bonded to said substrate. The additional electrodes preferably are at the same potential
as the adjacent micromirror. The light source, micromirror
array and collection optics preferably are disposed to
project an image onto a target. The target preferably is
a retina of a viewer, a photosensitive material, or a
screen. All on micromirrors in the array preferably are
disposed so as to concurrently direct light through the
collection optics. The micromirror array preferably is a
packaged micromirror array having a light transmissive
window in the package to allow the light beam from the
light source to be incident on the micromirror array,
wherein the light transmissive window is not parallel to
the substrate of the micromirror array. The light transmissive window preferably is at an angle of from -2 to -15
degrees relative to the micromirror array substrate. The
light transmissive window preferably is at an angle from
-3 to -10 degrees relative to the micromirror array substrate. The array of micromirrors preferably preferably is
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
4
6
disposed in a rectangular shape, the micromirrors capable of rotation around a switching axis between the offstate and the on-state, the micromirrors corresponding
to pixels in a viewed image; the light source being disposed so as to direct light non-perpendicular to at least
two sides of each micromirror, and parallel, when viewed
as a top view of each micromirror, to at least two other
sides of each micromirror. The light source preferably
directs light at an angle substantially perpendicular to the
switching axes of the micromirrors. The projection system preferably further comprises a color separating element provided between the light source and the micromirror array. The light source preferably is disposed to
direct light at the micromirrors such that the light impinges
on a leading side of each micromirror at an angle of from
100 to 150 degrees.
[0020] Still another aspect of the invention is a method
for spatially modulating a light beam, comprising directing
a light beam from a light source to light collection optics
via an array of micromirrors disposed to spatially modulate the light beam from the light source, the array formed
on a substrate and each micromirror being in a first position when not modulated, modulating micromirrors in
the array so that each micromirror moves to an on position that directs light to the light collection optics for the
array, and moves to an off position for directing light away
from the light collection optics, both said on and off positions being different from said first position, and wherein
the on position is at a magnitude of an angle relative to
the first position different from the magnitude of an angle
when in the off position.
[0021] Still another aspect of the invention is an optical
micromechanical element formed on a substrate having
an on position at a first magnitude of an angle relative to
the substrate, having an off position at a second magnitude of an angle to the substrate, the first and second
magnitudes being different, and having a third position
substantially parallel to the substrate, both the on and off
positions being defined by abutment of the optical micromechanical element against the substrate or against
structure formed on said substrate.
[0022] Preferably landing electrodes are provided on
the substrate against which the micro-mirror stops in the
on and off positions. One landing electrode preferably is
positioned higher relative to the substrate than another
landing electrode, ement of claim 157, that is in a package, the package comprising a window that is at an angle
to the substrate. The package preferably is a hermetic
or partially hermetic package. The micromechanical element preferably further comprises a molecular scavenger in the package. The micromechanical element preferably further comprises a stiction reduction agent within
the package. The micromechanical element preferably
further comprises flexure hinges disposed in a gap between a plate of the micromirror element and the substrate. The micromechanical element preferably further
comprises deflection electrodes for deflecting the element to the on or off position. At least one deflection
7
EP 1 553 437 B1
electrode preferably is disposed for moving the element
to the on position, and at least one deflection electrode
is disposed for moving the element to the off position.
[0023] Yet another aspect of the invention is a method
for modulating light, comprising reflecting light from an
array of deflectable micromirrors disposed on a planar
substrate; said micromirrors tilted to either a first position
or to a second position; wherein the angle formed between said first position and the substrate, and the angle
formed between said second position and the substrate,
are substantially different.
[0024] Another part of the invention is a method for
modulating light, comprising a light source, a planar light
modulator array comprising a deflectable elements and
collection optics, wherein the elements in the array are
selectively configured in at least two states, wherein the
first state elements direct the light from the light source
through a first angle into the collection optics, and in the
second state elements direct the light from the light
source through a second angle into the collection optics,
a third angle representing light that is reflected from the
array as if it were a micromirrored surface, wherein the
difference between the first and third and second and
third angles are substantially different.
[0025] Another aspect of the invention is a projection
system, comprising a light source for providing a light
beam; a micromirror array comprising a plurality of micromirrors provided in a path of the light beam; and collection optics disposed in a path of the light beam after
the light beam is incident on the micromirror array and
reflects off of the plurality of micromirrors as a pattern of
on and off micromirrors in the array; wherein the micromirror array comprises a substrate, the array of micromirrors being held on the substrate where each micromirror is capable of moving to an on position and an off
position from a non-deflected position, wherein the on
position is at a different angle than the off position relative
to the non-deflected position.
[0026] Still another part of the invention is a method
for projecting an image onto a target, comprising directing
a light beam from a light source onto a micromirror array;
modulating the micromirrors each to an on or off position,
wherein in the on position, micromirrors direct light to
collection optics disposed for receiving light from micromirrors in their on position, wherein the pattern of on and
off micromirrors forms an image; and wherein the position
of the micromirrors in their on position is at a different
magnitude of an angle compared to the magnitude of the
angle of the micromirrors in their off position.
[0027] Yet another part of the invention is a method
for spatially modulating a light beam, comprising directing
a beam of light onto an array of micromirrors, the micromirrors capable of movement to a first or second position,
wherein in the first position the micromirrors direct a portion of the beam of light incident thereon into a collection
optic, and wherein the minimum distance between adjacent micromirrors when each in the second position is
less than the minimum distance between the adjacent
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
5
8
micromirrors when each is in the first position.
[0028] Another aspect of the invention is a device comprising a substrate on which is formed a movable reflective or diffractive micromechanical device; a package for
holding the substrate with the movable micromechanical
device; wherein the package comprises an optically
transmissive window that is non-parallel to the substrate.
[0029] A further part of the invention is a projection
system, comprising a light source; light collection optics;
a substrate on which is formed a movable reflective or
diffractive micromechanical device; a package for holding the substrate with the movable micromechanical device; wherein the package comprises an optically transmissive window that is non-parallel to the substrate; the
packaged micromechanical device disposed in a path of
a light beam from the light source for modulating light
from the light beam, and the collection optics collecting
the modulated light
[0030] According to a referred aspect of the invention,
the optically transmissive window is display quality glass.
According to a referred aspect of the invention, the above
projection system further comprises bond wires on a first
side for electrically connecting the substrate to the package. The optically transmissive window preferably is further from the substrate at a point above the bond wires
on the substrate than at an opposite end of the substrate.
The package preferably is a hermetic or partially hermetic
package. According to a referred aspect of the invention,
the above projection system further comprises a molecular scavenger in the package. Preferably the micromechanical device is a micromirror array for spatially modulating a light beam.
[0031] A still further part of the invention is a projector
comprising a light source, a packaged MEMS device having a substrate with a micromechanical device thereon
and a window in the package disposed at an angle to the
substrate, and collection optics disposed to receive light
from the light source after modulation by the packaged
MEMS device.
[0032] Another aspect of the invention is a method for
making a micromirror, comprising providing a substrate;
depositing and patterning a first sacrificial layer on the
substrate; depositing at least one hinge layer on the sacrificial layer and patterning the at least one hinge layer
to define at least one flexure hinge; depositing and patterning a second sacrificial layer; depositing at least one
mirror layer on the second sacrificial layer and patterning
the at least one mirror layer to form a mirror element; and
removing the first and second sacrificial layers so as to
release the micromirror.
[0033] And still yet another aspect of the invention is
an optical micromechanical device, comprising a substrate; a first post on the substrate; a flexure hinge where
a proximal end of flexure hinge is on the post; a second
post attached to a distal end of the flexure hinge; and a
plate attached to the second post.
[0034] According to a referred aspect of the invention,
the above projection system further comprises a color
9
EP 1 553 437 B1
separating element provided between the light source
and the micromirror array. The micromirrors preferably
comprise metal and a dielectric material. The dielectric
material preferably is a nitride, carbide or oxide of silicon.
The micromirrors are preferably disposed above a circuit
substrate. The circuit substrate is preferably a CMOS
substrate. The micromirrors are preferably attached to
an upper glass substrate which is bonded to a lower silicon substrate. The upper and lower substrates are preferably held together via UV and/or IR epoxy. From 64,000
to about 6,000,000 micromirrors are preferably provided
in an area of from about 1 cm2 to about (2,54 cm)2 (1
in2). Furthermore, a rectangular mask is preferably disposed on or above the micromirror array.
[0035] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the micromirror array preferably comprises four corner
active micromirrors which define a rectangle with four
sides. The micromirrors preferably comprise at least four
elongated micromirror sides, one or more of the micromirror sides being neither parallel nor perpendicular to
any side of the rectangle defined by the four corner active
micromirrors. Preferably no micromirror side is parallel
or perpendicular to any side of the micromirror rectangle
array. At least two micromirror sides are preferably neither parallel or perpendicular to the sides of the micromirror array rectangle, and wherein at least two micromirror sides are parallel to sides of the micromirror array
rectangle. Each micromirror has preferably a shape of a
parallelogram or an assembly of parallelograms. The
shape as an assembly of parallelograms preferably appears as a series of parallelograms each a micromirror
image of an adjacent parallelogram. The shape as an
assembly of parallelograms preferably appears as a series of identical parallelograms. The micromirrors preferably have shapes other than substantially rectangular.
[0036] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the projection system comprises an array of micromirrors, each micromirror corresponding to a pixel in a
viewed image and having a shape of a concave polygon
or one or more non-rectangular parallelograms; a light
source for directing light to the array of micromirrors collection optics disposed to receive light reflected from the
micromirrors. Each micromirror preferably has a shape
of a non-rectangular parallelogram or an assembly of
non-rectangular parallelograms side by side. The shape
as an assembly of parallelograms preferably appears as
a series of parallelograms each a micromirror image of
an adjacent parallelogram. The shape preferably is a
concave polygon having six or more sides and at least
one concave portion.
[0037] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the number of parallelograms is less than M/λ, where M
is the width of the micromirror and λ is the wavelength
of incident light. The number of parallelograms preferably
is less than .5M/λ. The number of parallelograms preferably is less than 0.1M/λ. The micromirrors preferably
comprise 6 or more elongated straight sides. The 6 or
more sides preferably form a shape with at least one
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
6
10
projection and cut-out. The micromirrors preferably comprise 8 or more sides. The projection and cut-out are in
the form of a triangle. The projection preferably forms an
exterior angle of from 70 to 120 degrees, and the cut-out
forms a corresponding interior angle of from 70 to 120
degrees. The micromirrors preferably have shapes that
are substantially different from a square shape. The micromirrors preferably have at least two exterior angles of
between 35 and 60 degrees. The micromirrors preferably
have straight sides that are neither parallel nor perpendicular to the sides of the rectangular active area. Each
micromirror preferably has the shape of a concave polygon having more than 4 sides and 4 angles.
[0038] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the array has a substantially rectangular shape and comprising at least 1,000 micromirrors, wherein the micromirrors are in the shape of a concave or convex polygon
and wherein no sides of the polygonal micromirrors are
parallel to the sides of the substantially rectangular active
area. The micromirrors preferably have at least 4 substantially straight sides, none of which are parallel to leading or trailing sides of the rectangular active area. The
array preferably comprises four corner micromirrors
which, when connected together, form the rectangular
shape of the array. The micromirrors preferably have
switching axes parallel to at least two sides of the rectangular array. Each micromirror preferably has a shape
of a parallelogram or an assembly of parallelograms. The
micromirrors preferably comprises 5 or more elongated
straight sides. The micromirrors preferably comprise 6
or more sides form a shape with at least one projection
and cut-out. The micromirrors preferably comprise 8 or
more sides. The projection and cut-out preferably are in
the form of a triangle. The projection preferably forms an
exterior angle of from 70 to 120 degrees, and the cut-out
forms a corresponding interior angle of from 70 to 120
degrees. The micromirrors preferably have at least two
polygon sides that form an angle therebetween of less
than 90 degrees. The micromirrors preferably have at
least two polygon sides that form an angle therebetween
of from 35 to 60 degrees. The micromirrors each preferably have a shape of an assembly of from 1 to 10 parallelograms. The micromirrors preferably have sides that
are about 35 to 55 degrees to the sides of the active area.
[0039] According to a preferred aspect of the invention,
the projection system comprises a light source for providing an incident light beam, an array of movable reflective elements, and collection optics for projecting light
from the array, wherein an image projected from the projection system will appear on a target as a rectangular
image, with the image being formed of from thousands
to millions of pixels, each pixel being in the shape of a
concave polygon, a single non-rectangular parallelogram, or an assembly of non-rectangular parallelograms.
Each pixel in the projected image preferably is a concave
polygon having more than 4 sides and 4 angles. Preferably no pixel sides are parallel to at least two of the sides
of the rectangular projected image. At least two pixel
11
EP 1 553 437 B1
sides preferably are non-parallel and non-perpendicular
to the projected image sides, and wherein at least two
pixel sides are parallel and perpendicular to projected
image sides. At least one pixel side preferably extends
in a direction at an angle of from 35 to 85 degrees from
one of the projected image sides. At least two pixel sides
preferably extend in a direction at an angle of from 40 to
55 degrees from at least one of the projected image sides.
[0040] Embodiments of the invention are now described with reference to the drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a top view of one embodiment of the micromirrors of the present invention;
Figs. 2A to 2E are cross sectional views of one method for making the micromirrors of the present invention, taken along line 2 - 2 of Fig. 1;
Figs. 3A to 3D are cross sectional views of the same
method shown in Figures 2A to 2E, but taken along
line 3 - 3 of Fig. 1;
Figs. 4A to 4J are cross sectional views illustrating
a further method for making micromirrors for the
present invention;
Figs. 5A to 5G are cross sectional views illustrating
yet a further method for making micromirrors in accordance with the present invention;
Figs. 6A to 6C are plan views of different micromirror
shape and hinge combinations;
Fig. 7 is a plan view of a portion of a micromirror
array with multiple micromirrors the same as in Fig.
6A;
Fig. 8 is a partially exploded isometric view of a micromirror of one embodiment of the invention;
Figs. 9A to 9C are cross sectional views showing
actuation of a micromirror of the embodiment of Fig.
8;
Figs 10A to 10D are cross sectional views of a process in accordance with yet another embodiment of
the invention;
Figs. 11A to 11C are cross sectional views showing
actuation of a micromirror made in accordance with
the method illustrated in Figs. 10A to 10D;
Fig. 12 is a plan view of multiple micromirrors in a
micromirror array formed in accordance with the
method of Figs. 11A to 11C;
Fig. 13 is a partially exploded isometric view of the
micromirror of Fig. 12;
Figs. 14A to 14C illustrate micromirrors having a flat
non-deflected ’off’ state;
Figs. 15A to 15C illustrate micromirrors having deflected ’on’ and ’off’ states of equal angles;
Figs. 16A to 16C illustrated micromirrors having a
greater angle for the ’on’ state than the ’off’ state;
Figs. 17A to 17E illustrate a package arrangement
for micromirrors having an angled window;
Fig. 18 is an illustration of the illumination system for
the micromirror array of the present invention;
Figs. 19A to 19E illustrate the relationship between
angle of incident light, micromirror sides, and active
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
7
12
area sides;
Fig. 20 is an illustration of a prior art micromirror array;
Figs. 21 and 22 are illustrations of an embodiment
of the invention where square micromirrors are at an
angle to the active area sides;
Figs. 23 to 25 illustrate micromirrors where "leading"
and "trailing" edges of the micromirrors are not perpendicular to the incident light beam;
Figs. 26A to 26F and 27A to 27F are illustrations of
micromirrors having the shapes of one or more parallelograms;
Fig. 28 is an illustration of a single micromirror;
Fig. 29 is an illustration of a micromirror array having
part of the leading and trailing sides perpendicular
to the incident light beam, and another part at a 45
degree angle to the incident light beam;
Figs. 30 and 31 are illustrations of micromirror arrays
where the micromirrors have no sides parallel or perpendicular to the incident light beam or the sides of
the active area of the array;
Figs. 32A to 32J are illustrations of micromirrors with
corresponding hinge structures; and
Figs. 33A to 33C are illustrations of diffraction patterns having a diffraction line passing through the
acceptance cone of the collection optics (33A) and
avoiding the acceptance cone (33B and 33C).
[0041] Processes for microfabricating a movable micromirror or micromirror array are disclosed in U.S. Patents 5,835,256 and 6,046,840. A similar process for forming the micromirrors of the present invention is illustrated
in Figs. 1 to 3. Fig. 1 is a top view of one embodiment of
the micromirrors of the present invention. As can be seen
in Fig. 1, posts 21a and 21b hold micromirror plate 24
via hinges 120a and 120b above a lower substrate having
electrodes thereon (not shown) for causing deflection of
micromirror plate 24. Though not shown in Fig. 1, and as
will be discussed further herein, thousands or even millions of micromirrors 24 can be provided in an array for
reflecting light incident thereon and projecting an image
to a viewer or target/screen.
[0042] Micromirror 24, and the other micromirrors in
the array, can be fabricated by many different methods.
One method is illustrated in Figs. 2A to 2E (taken along
cross section 2 - 2 from Fig. 1) where the micromirrors
are fabricated on preferably a light transmissive substrate
which is then bonded to a circuit substrate. This method
is disclosed further in U.S. Provisional Patent Application
60/229,246 and U.S. Patent Application 09/732,445.
Though the method will be describe in connection with a
light transmissive substrate, any other suitable substrate
could be used, such as a semiconductor substrate with
circuitry. If a semiconductor substrate such as single
crystal silicon is used, it may be preferred to electrically
connect the micromirror posts to the metal 3 layer in the
IC process and utilize conductive materials for at least a
part of the micromirrors. Methods of forming micromirrors
13
EP 1 553 437 B1
directly on a circuit substrate (instead of on a separate
light transmissive substrate) will be discussed in more
detail further herein.
[0043] As can be seen in Fig. 2A, a light transmissive
substrate 13 (at least prior to adding further layers thereon) such as glass (e.g., Coming 1737F or Eagle2000),
quartz, Pyrex™, sapphire, etc. is provided. The light
transmissive substrate can have an optional light blocking layer added on its lower side to help in handling the
substrate during processing. Such a light blocking layer
could be a TiN layer deposited by reactive sputtering to
a depth of 2000 angstroms on the back side of the light
transmissive substrate, which would later be removed
once processing is complete. The substrate can be any
shape or size, though one that is the shape of a standard
wafer used in an integrated circuit fabrication facility is
preferred.
[0044] As can also be seen in Fig. 2A, a sacrificial layer
14, such as amorphous silicon, is deposited. The sacrificial layer can be another suitable material that can later
be removed from under the micromechanical structural
materials (e.g., SiO2, polysilicon, polyimide, novolac,
etc.). The thickness of the sacrificial layer can be wide
ranging depending upon the movable element/micromirror size and desired tilt angle, though a thickness of from
500Å to 50,000 Å, preferably around 5000 Å is preferred.
Alternative to the amorphous silicon, the sacrificial layer
could be any of a number of polymers, photoresist or
other organic material (or even polysilicon, silicon nitride,
silicon dioxide, etc. depending upon the materials selected to be resistant to the etchant, and the etchant selected). An optional adhesion promoter (e.g., SiO2 or SiN)
can be provided prior to depositing the sacrifiical material.
[0045] Hole 6 having width "d" is formed in the sacrificial layer in order to provide a contact area between the
substrate 13 and later deposited micromechanical structural layers. The holes are formed by spinning on a photoresist and directing light through a mask to increase or
decrease solubility of the resist (depending upon whether
the resist is a positive or negative resist). Dimension "d"
can be from 0.2 to 2 micrometers (preferably around 0.7
um), depending upon the ultimate size of the micromirror
and the micromirror array. After developing the resist to
remove the resist in the area of the holes, the holes are
etched in the sacrificial amorphous silicon with a chlorine
or other suitable etchant (depending upon the sacrificial
material). The remaining photoresist is then removed,
such as with an oxygen plasma. The hole in the sacrificial
layer can be any suitable size, though preferably having
a diameter of from 0.1 to 1.5 um, more preferably around
0.7 +/- 0.25um. The etching is performed down to the
glass/quartz substrate or down to any intermediate layers
such as adhesion promoting layers. If the light transmissive substrate is etched at all, it is preferably in an amount
less than 2000 Å. If the sacrificial layer 14 is a directly
pattemable material (e.g., a novolac or other photosensitive photoresist) then an additional layer of photoresist
deposited and developed on top of the sacrificial layer
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
8
14
14 is not needed. In such a case, the photoresist sacrificial layer is patterned to remove material in the area of
hole(s) 6 and then optionally hardened before depositing
additional layers.
[0046] At this point, as can be seen in Fig. 2B, a first
structural layer 7 is deposited by, e.g., chemical vapor
deposition. Preferably the material is silicon nitride or silicon oxide deposited by LPCVD (low pressure chemical
vapor deposition) or PECVD (plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition), however any suitable thin film material such as polysilicon, a metal or metal alloy, silicon
carbide or an organic compound could be deposited at
this point (of course the sacrificial layer and etchant
should be adapted to the structural material(s) used). The
thickness of this first layer can vary depending upon the
movable element size and desired amount of stiffness of
the element, however in one embodiment the layer has
a thickness of from 100 to 3200 Å, more preferably between 900 and 1100 Å. As can be seen in Fig. 2B, layer
7 extends into the holes etched in the sacrificial layer.
[0047] A second layer 8 is deposited as can be seen
in Fig. 2C. The material can be the same (e.g., silicon
nitride) as the first layer or different (silicon oxide, silicon
carbide, polysilicon, etc.) and can be deposited by chemical vapor deposition as for the first layer. The thickness
of the second layer can be greater or less than the first,
depending upon the desired stiffness for the movable
element, the desired flexibility of the hinge, the material
used, etc. In one embodiment the second layer has a
thickness of from 50 Å to 2100 Å, and preferably around
900 Å. In another embodiment, the first layer is deposited
by PECVD and the second layer by LPCVD.
[0048] In the embodiment illustrated in Figs. 2A to 2E,
both the first and second layers are deposited in the areas
defining the movable (micromirror) element and the
posts. Depending upon the desired stiffness for the micromirror element, it is also possible to deposit only one
of the first or second layers in the area of the micromirror
element. Also, a single layer could be provided in place
of the two layers 7, 8 for all areas of the microstructure,
though this could involve a tradeoff in plate stiffness and
hinge flexibility. Also, if a single layer is used, the area
forming the hinge could be partially etched to lower the
thickness in this area and increase the flexibility of the
resulting hinge. It is also possible to use more than two
layers to produce a laminate movable element, which
can be desirable particularly when the size of the movable
element is increased such as for switching light beams
in an optical switch. The materials for such layer or layers
could also comprise alloys of metals and dielectrics or
compounds of metals and nitrogen, oxygen or carbon
(particularly the transition metals). Some of these alternative materials are disclosed in U.S Provisional Patent
Application 60/228,007.
[0049] As can be seen in Fig. 2D, a reflective layer 9
is deposited. The reflective material can be gold, silver,
titanium, aluminum or other metal, or an alloy of more
than one metal, though it is preferably aluminum depos-
15
EP 1 553 437 B1
ited by PVD. The thickness of the metal layer can be from
50 to 2000 Å, preferably around 500 Å. An optional metal
passivation layer (not shown) can be added, e.g., a 10
to 1100 Å silicon oxide layer deposited by PECVD on top
of layer 9. Other metal deposition techniques can be used
for depositing metal layer 9, such as chemical fluid deposition and electroplating. After depositing layer 9, photoresist is spun on and patterned, followed by etching of
the metal layer with a suitable metal etchant. In the case
of an aluminum layer, a chlorine(or bromine) chemistry
can be used (e.g., a plasma/RIE etch with Cl2 and/or BCl3
(or Cl2, CCl4, Br2, CBr4, etc.) with an optional preferably
inert diluent such as Ar and/or He). It should be noted
that the reflective layer need not be deposited last, but
rather could be deposited directly upon the sacrificial layer 14, between other layers defining the micromirror element, or as the only layer defining the micromirror element. However, in some processes it may be desirable
to deposit a metal layer after a dielectric layer due to the
higher temperature at which many dielectrics are deposited.
[0050] Relating to Fig. 2E, the first and second layers
7, 8 can be etched subsequent to the reflective layer with
known etchants or combinations of etchants (depending
upon the material used and level of isotropy desired). For
example, the first and second layers can be etched with
a chlorine chemistry or a fluorine (or other halide) chemistry (e.g., a plasma/RIE etch with F2, CF4, CHF3, C3F8,
CH2F2, C2F6, SF6, etc. or more likely combinations of
the above or with additional gases, such as CF4/H2,
SF6/Cl2, or gases using more than one etching species
such as CF2Cl2, all possibly with one or more optional
inert diluents). Of course, if different materials are used
for the first layer and the second layer, then a different
etchant can be employed for etching each layer (plasma
etching chemistry known in the art depending upon the
materials used). If the reflective layer is deposited before
the first and second layers, the etching chemistries used
would be reversed. Or, depending upon the materials
used, all layers could be etched together. Gaps 20a and
20b having a width "e" shown in Fig. 2E are for separating
the post 21 from the micromirror body 22.
[0051] Figures 3A to 3D illustrate the same process
taken along a different cross section (cross section 3-3
in Figure 1) and show the light transmissive substrate
13, on which is deposited a sacrificial layer 14. On sacrificial layer 14 is deposited structural layer 7. As can be
seen in Figs. 3B and 3C, a part of layer 7 is removed
prior to adding layers 8 and 9. This portion removed is in
the area where the hinge is to be formed, and allows for
increased flexibility in the hinge area. This "thinning" of
the hinge area in this way, is set forth in US Provisional
Patent Application 60/178,902 and in US Patent Application 09/767,632. After removing portions of layer 7,
layers 8 and 9 are added, followed by patterning of layers
7, 8 and 9 as set forth above. As can be seen in Fig. 3D,
hinges 23 have width "a" that can be from 0.1 to 10 um,
preferably around 0.7 um. The hinges 23 are separated
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
9
16
from each other by a gap "b" and from adjacent micromirror plates by gaps "c" that also can be from 0.1 to 10
um, preferably around 0.7 um.
[0052] The process steps mentioned generally above,
can be implemented in a number of ways. For example,
a glass wafer (such as a Coming 1737F, Eagle 2000,
quartz or sapphire wafer) can be provided and coated
with an opaque coating, such as a Cr, Ti, Al, TaN, polysilicon or TiN or other opaque coating at a thickness of
2000 angstroms (or more depending upon the material)
on the backside of the wafer, in order to make the transparent substrate temporarily opaque for handling. Then,
in accordance with Figs. 1-4, after an optional adhesion
layer is deposited (e.g., a material with dangling silicon
bond such as SiNx - or SiOx, or a conductive material
such as vitreous carbon or indium tin oxide) then a sacrificial material of hydrogenated amorphous silicon is deposited (gas = SiH4 (200 sccm), 1500 sccm of Ar, power
= 100W, pressure = 3.5T, temp = 380C, electrode spacing = 350 mil; or gas = 150 sccm of SiHy, 100 sccm of
Ar, power = 55W, pressure = 3Torr, temp = 380C, electrode spacing = 350 mil; or gas = 200sccm SiH4, 1500
sccm Ar, power = 100W, temp = 300C, pressure = 3.5T;
or other process points in between these settings) on the
transparent wafer at a thickness of 5000 Angstroms in a
plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition system
such as an Applied Materials P5000. Or, the sacrificial
material could be deposited by LPCVD at 560C, along
the lines set forth in US Patent 5,835,256. Or, the sacrificial material could be deposited by sputtering, or could
be a non-silicon containing material such as an organic
material (to be later removed by, e.g., plasma oxygen
ash). The a-Si is patterned (photoresist and etched by a
chlorine chemistry, e.g., Cl2, BCl3 and N2), so as to form
holes for attachment of the micromirror to the glass substrate. A first layer of silicon nitride, for creating stiffness
in the micromirror and for connecting the micromirror to
the glass, is deposited by PECVD (RF power = 150W,
pressure = 3 Torr, temp = 360C, electrode spacing = 570
mils, gas = N2/SiH4/NH3 (1500/25/10); or RF power =
127W, pressure = 2.5T, temp = 380 C, gas =
N2/SiH4/NH3 (1500/25/10 sccm), electrode spacing =
550 mil, or other process parameters could be used, such
as power at 175W and pressure at 3.5 Torr) at a thickness
of 900 Angstroms and is patterned (pressure = 800 mT,
RF power = 100 to 200W, electrode spacing = 0.8 to 1.1
mm, gas = CF4/CHF3/Ar (60 or 70/40 to 70/600 to 800
sccm, He = 0 to 200 sccm), so as to remove the silicon
nitride in areas in which the micromirror hinges will be
formed. Next, a second layer of silicon nitride is deposited
by PECVD (RF power = 127W, pressure = 2.5T, temp =
380 C, gas = N2/SiH4/NH3 (1500/25/10 sccm), electrode
spacing = 550 mil) at a thickness of 900 Angstroms. Then,
Al is sputtered onto the second silicon nitride layer at a
thickness of 500 Angstroms at a temp of from 140 to
180C, power = 2000 W, Ar = 135 sccm. Or, instead of
Al, the material could be an aluminum alloy (Al-Si (1%),
Al-Cu (0.5%) or Al-SiCu or AlTi), as well as an implanted
17
EP 1 553 437 B1
or target doped aluminum. The aluminum is patterned in
the P5000 with a chlorine chemistry (pressure = 40mT,
power = 550W, gas = BCl3/Cl2/N2 = 50/15/30 sccm).
Then, the SiN layers are etched (pressure = 100mT, power = 460W, gas = CF4/N2 (9/20 sccm)), followed by ashing in a H2O + O2 + N2 chemistry in plasma. Next, the
remaining structures are ACT cleaned (acetone + DI wafer solution) and spun dry. (This clean can also be done
with EKC Technology’s EKS265 photoresist residue remover or other solvent based cleaner). After resist coating the frontside of the wafer having the microstructures
thereon, the backside TiN is etched in a BCl3/Cl2/CF4
chemistry in plasma (or other metal etchant from CRC
Handbook of Metal Etchants) - or polished or ground off
using CMP, or removed with acid vapor such as HF -followed by a second ACT clean (acetone + DI wafer
solution) and a second spin dry. The wafer is singulated
into individual die and each die is exposed to 300 W CF4
plasma (pressure = 150 Torr, 85 sccm for 60 seconds,
followed by 300 sec etch in a mixture of He, XeF2 and
N2 (etch pressure 158 Torr). The etch is performed by
providing the die in a chamber of N2 at around 400 Torr.
A second area/chamber has therein 3.5 Torr XeF2 and
38.5 Torr He. A barrier between the two areas/chambers
is removed, resulting in the combined XeF2, He and N2
etching mixture.
[0053] Or, the transparent wafer (e.g., Coming 1737F)
is coated with TiN at a thickness of 2000 angstroms on
the backside of the glass wafer. Then, in accordance with
Figs. 1-4, without an adhesion layer, a sacrificial material
of hydrogenated amorphous silicon is deposited (power
= 100W, pressure = 3.5T, temp = 300C, SiH4 = 200sccm,
Ar = 1500 sccm, or pressure = 2.5 Torr, power = 50 W,
temp = 360C, electrode spacing = 350 mils, SiH4 flow =
200 sccm, Ar flow = 2000 sccm) on a glass wafer at a
thickness of 5300 Angstroms in an Applied Materials
P5000. The a-Si is patterned (photoresist and etched by
a chlorine chemistry, e.g., Cl2, BCl3 and N2 - 50W), so
as to form holes for attachment of the micromirror to the
glass substrate. A first layer of silicon nitride, for creating
stiffness in the micromirror and for connecting the micromirror to the glass, is deposited by PECVD (pressure =
3Torr, 125W, 360C,gap = 570, SiH4 = 25 sccm, NH3 =
10 sccm, N2 = 1500 sccm)) at a thickness of 900 Angstroms and is patterned (CF4/CHF3), so as to remove
the silicon nitride in areas in which the micromirror hinges
will be formed. Next, a second layer of silicon nitride is
deposited by PECVD (same conditions as first layer) at
a thickness of 900 Angstroms. Then, Al is sputtered (150
C) onto the second silicon nitride layer at a thickness of
500 Angstroms. The aluminum is patterned in the P5000
with a chlorine chemistry (BCl3, Cl2, Ar). Then, the SiN
layers are etched (CHF3, CF4), followed by ashing in a
barrel asher (O2, CH3OH at 250 C). Next, the remaining
structures are cleaned with EKC Technology’s EKS265
photoresist residue remover. After resist coating the
frontside of the wafer having the microstructures thereon,
the backside TiN is etched in a SF6/Ar plasma, followed
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
10
18
by a second clean and a second spin dry.
[0054] After depositing the sacrificial and structural
layers on a wafer substrate, the wafer is singulated and
each die then is placed in a Drytek parallel plate RF plasma reactor. 100 sccm of CF4 and 30 sccm of O2 flow to
the plasma chamber, which is operated at about 200
mtorr for 80 seconds. Then, the die is etched for 300
seconds at 143 Torr etch pressure (combined XeF2, He
and N2). The etch is performed by providing the die in a
chamber of N2 at around 400 Torr. A second area/chamber has therein 5.5 Torr XeF2 and 20 Torr He. A barrier
between the two areas/chambers is removed, resulting
in the combined XeF2, He and N2 etching mixture. The
above could also be accomplished in a parallel plate plasma etcher with power at 300 W CF4 (150 Torr, 85 sccm)
for 120 seconds. Additional features of the second
(chemical, non-plasma) etch are disclosed in US patent
application 09/427,841 to Patel et al. filed October 26,
1999, and US patent application 09/649.
[0055] Though the hinge of each micromirror can be
formed essentially in the same plane as the micromirror
element (layers 7, 8 and 9 for the micromirror body vs.
layers 8 and 9 for the micromirror hinge in Fig. 3D) as
set forth above, they can also be formed separated from
and parallel to the micromirror element in a different plane
and as part of a separate processing step (after deposition of a second sacrificial material). This superimposed
type of hinge is disclosed in Figs. 8 and 9 of the previously-mentioned U.S. Patent 6,046,840, and in more detail in U.S. Patent Application 09/631,536. Whether
formed with one sacrificial layer as in the Figures, or two
(or more) sacrificial layers as for the superimposed hinge,
such sacrificial layers are removed as will be discussed
below, with a preferably isotropic etchant. This "release"
of the micromirrors can be performed immediately following the above-described steps, or immediately prior
to assembly with the circuitry on the second substrate. If
the circuitry, electrodes and micromirrors are not formed
on the same substrate, then after forming the micromirrors on a light transmissive substrate as set forth above,
a second substrate is provided that contains a large array
of electrodes on a top metal layer (e.g., metal 3) of the
substrate (e.g., a silicon wafer). As can be seen in Fig.
11A, a light transmissive substrate 40 with an array of
micromirrors 44 formed thereon as discussed above, is
bonded to a second substrate 60 having circuitry and
electrodes at voltages V0, VA and VB formed as a last
layer thereon (a single electrode per micromirror could
also be used for a micromirror embodiment with a single
direction of movement such as that illustrated in Fig. 1).
The micromirrors 44 are kept spaced apart from the electrodes on substrate 60 by spacers 41 (e.g., photoresist
spacers adjacent every micromirror and/or spacers deposited within epoxy when bonding substrate 40 to substrate 60. One or more electrodes on the circuit substrate
electrostatically control a pixel (one micromirror on the
upper optically transmissive substrate) of the microdisplay. The voltage on each electrode on the surface of the
19
EP 1 553 437 B1
backplane determines whether its corresponding microdisplay pixel is optically ’on’ or ’off,’ forming a visible image on the microdisplay. Details of the backplane and
methods for producing a pulse-width-modulated grayscale or color image are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application 09/564. The assembly of the first and second substrates is set forth in more detail in the Ilkov et al. patent
applications referred to previously. Many different types
of wafer bonding are known in the art, such as adhesive,
anodic, eutectic, fusion, microwave, solder and thermocompression bonding.
[0056] The release of the micromirrors of the present
invention can be a single or multi-step process, with the
type of process depending upon the type of sacrificial
material used. In one embodiment of the invention, the
first etch is performed that has relatively low selectivity
(e.g., less than 200:1, preferably less than 100:1 and
more preferably less than 10:1), and a second etch follows that has higher selectivity (e.g., greater than 100:1,
preferably greater than 200:1 and more preferably greater than 1000:1). Such a dual etching is set forth further
in US Patent Application 60/293,092. Of course other
release methods could be used, depending upon the sacrificial material. For example, if a photoresist or other organic material is the sacrificial material, oxygen plasma
ashing or a supercritical fluid release could be used. Plasmas containing pure oxygen can produce species that
attack organic materials to form H2O, CO and CO2 as
products and do not etch SiO2, Al or Si. Or, if the sacrificial
material is SiO2, then an etchant such as an isotropic
dry etchant (CHF3 + O2, NF3 or SF6) could be used. If
the sacrificial material is silicon nitride, then fluorine atoms could be used to isotropically etch the silicon nitride
(e.g., CF4/O2, CHF3/O2, CH2F2 or CH3F plasmas). If
the sacrificial material is amorphous silicon, then fluorine
atoms in the form of XeF2, BrF3 or BrCl3 could be used.
If the sacrificial layer is aluminum, then a chlorine chemistry (BCL3, CCl4, SiCl4) could be used. Of course any
etchant (and sacrificial material) would be selected at
least in part based upon the amount of undercut etching
needed.
[0057] Another process for forming micromirrors illustrated in Figs. 4A to 4J. As can be seen in Fig. 4A, a
substrate 30 (this can be any suitable substrate, such as
a glass/quartz substrate or a semiconductor circuit substrate) that has deposited thereon a sacrificial material
31. Any suitable sacrificial material can be used, preferably one that has a large etching selectivity ratio between
the material being etched and the sacrificial material. One
possible sacrificial material is an organic sacrificial material, such as photoresist, or other organic materials
such as set forth in US Patent Application 60/298,529
filed June 15, 2001 to Reid et al. Depending upon the
exact make-up of the structural layer(s), other known
MEMS sacrificial materials, such as amorphous silicon
or PSG could be used. If the sacrificial material is not
directly patternable, then a photoresist layer 32 is added
and developed to form one or more apertures (Fig. 4B).
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
11
20
Then, as can be seen in Fig. 4C, apertures 34 are etched
into the sacrificial material 31 and the photoresist 32 is
removed. As can be seen in Fig. 4D, a (preferably conductive) layer 35 is deposited that will ultimately form at
least the flexible portions for the MEMS device (in this
example a micromirror structure). Layer 35 can also form
the posts 36 for attaching the micromirror to the substrate,
or even all or part of the micromirror body. As will be
discussed further herein, the conductive layer 35 in a
preferred embodiment of the invention comprises a metal-Si,Al,B-nitride, preferably the metal is a transition metal, in particular a late transition metal. Layer 35 could
also be a plurality of (preferably conductive) layers, or
one conductive layer among many other types of layers
(structural dielectric layers, reflective layers, anti-stiction
layers, etc.). Layer 35 need not be conductive, and depending upon the exact method, target material and atmosphere used in the deposition process, layer 35 could
also be insulating.
[0058] Fig. 4E shows the addition of photoresist 37
(patterned) followed by etching of a portion of the nitride
layer(s) 35 and removal of the photoresist (Fig. 4F). Then,
as can be seen in Fig. 4G, micromirror structural material
layer 38 is deposited. The material can be conductive or
insulating, and can be a plurality of layers. If the material
is a single layer, it is preferably reflective (e.g., an aluminum or gold layer or metal alloy layer). Then, as can be
seen in Fig. 4H, photoresist 39 is added and developed
followed by (Fig. 4I) etching/removing portions of the layer 38 (such as in the area of the parts that will flex in
operation). Finally, as can be seen in Fig. 4J, the sacrificial layer is removed to release the MEMS device so as
to be free standing on the substrate. Not shown in Fig. 4
is circuitry that is formed on or in substrate 30 (if the
substrate is a circuit substrate) or a light blocking layer
on substrate 30 for improving automated handling of the
substrate (if the substrate is a light transmissive substrate
such as glass, quartz, sapphire, etc.).
[0059] As can be seen from Figs. 4A to 4J, a free standing MEMS structure is created where layer 35 forms a
flexible portion of the MEMS device, whereas layer 38
forms the structure that moves due to the flexible nature
of layer 35. Layer 38, as can be seen, forms both the
movable portion as well as the post or wall that holds the
MEMS structure on the substrate 30. The movable element can be formed as a laminate of layers 38 and 35
(as well as additional layers if desired), or solely from
layer 38, or even solely from layer 35. The make-up of
the movable and flexible elements depend upon the ultimate stiffness or flexibility desired, the ultimate conductivity desired, the MEMS device being formed, etc.
[0060] The micromirrors formed in accordance with
Figs. 1 to 4 are preferably formed on a light transmissive
substrate and have a non-deflected ’off’ state and a deflected ’on’ state. However, the micromirrors can be
formed on the same substrate as micromirror actuation
circuitry and electrodes. Also, both the ’on’ and ’off’ states
of the micromirror can be a position other than a flat non-
21
EP 1 553 437 B1
deflected state. In the embodiment illustrated in Figs. 5-9,
the micromirrors are formed on the same substrate as
electrodes and circuitry for moving the micromirrors. And,
the micromirrors not only have deflected ’on’ and ’off’
states, but the angle of deflection is different between
’on’ and ’off’. As is illustrated in Figs. 5A to 5G, a semiconductor substrate with circuitry and electrodes formed
thereon (or therein) can be the starting substrate for making micromirrors in accordance with the present invention.
[0061] As can be seen in Fig. 5A, a semiconductor
substrate 10 with circuitry for controlling the micromirror,
has a patterned metal layer formed into discrete areas
12a to 12e thereon - typically aluminum (e.g., the final
metal layer in a semiconductor process). A sacrificial layer 14 is deposited thereon, as can be seen in Fig. 5B. As
in the previous embodiments, the sacrificial material can
be selected from many materials depending upon the
adjacent structures and etchant desired. In the present
example, the sacrificial material is a novolac photoresist.
As can also be seen in Fig. 5B, apertures 15a and 15b
are formed in the sacrificial material by standard patterning methods for a novolac photoresist, so as to form apertures 15a to 15c connecting to metal areas 12a to 12c.
After forming apertures 15a to 15c, as can be seen in
Fig. 5C, plugs or other connections 16a to 16c are formed
in accordance with standard plug forming methods. For
example, Tungsten (W) could be deposited by CVD by
a) silicon reduction: 2WF6 + 3Si → 2W + 3SiF4 (This
reaction is normally produced by allowing the WF6 gas
to react with regions of exposed solid silicon on a wafer
surface at a temperature of about 300 C), b) hydrogen
reduction: WF6 + 3H2 → W + 6HF (This process is carried
out at reduced pressures, usually at temperatures below
450C), or c) silane reduction: 2WF6 + 3SiH4 → 2W +
3SiF4 + 6H2 (This reaction (LPCVD at around 300C) is
widely used to produce a W nucleation layer for the hydrogen reaction). Other conductive materials, particularly
other refractory metals, could be used for plugs 16a to
16c. After depositing a layer of the plug material, chemical
mechanical polishing (CMP) is performed down to the
sacrificial layer so as to form the plugs as shown in Fig.
5C. For some plug materials, it may be desirable to first
deposit a liner in order to avoid peeling (e.g., for a tungsten plug, a TiN, TiW or TiWN liner could be deposited
to surround the tungsten in the hole in the sacrificial material and later ter release of the sacrificial layer).
[0062] As can be seen in Fig. 5D, a conductive layer
is deposited and patterned so as to result in discrete metal areas 18a to 18c, each electrically connected to underlying metal areas 12a to 12c, respectively, via plugs
16a to 16c, respectively. The conductive layer can be
any suitable material (aluminum, alloys of aluminum, alloys of other metals, conductive ceramic compounds,
etc.) that is deposited by suitable methods such as physical vapor deposition or electroplating. The material
should preferably have both conductive properties as
well as a proper combination of hardness, elasticity, etc.
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
12
22
(as will be seen, area 18c will act as a hinge for the micromirror being formed). Of course discrete areas 18a to
18c need not be formed at the same time if different materials or properties are desired from one discrete area
to the next (likewise with the other areas formed in the
device, such as areas 12a to 12e and plugs 18a to 18c).
Naturally fewer process steps are involved if each discrete area within a layer is of the same material deposited
at the same time. In a preferred embodiment, this conductive layer is either an aluminum alloy or a conductive
binary or ternary (or higher) compound such as those
disclosed in US Patent Application 60/228,007 to Reid
filed August 23, 2000 and US Patent Application
60/300,533, deposited by reactive sputtering. The appropriate etching chemistry is used to pattern the conductive
layer (e.g., a chlorine chemistry for aluminum) so as to
form discrete conductive areas 18a to 18c.
[0063] As further illustrated in Fig. 5E, a second layer
of sacrificial layer 20 is deposited that could be the same
or different from the sacrificial material of layer 14 (preferably the material is the same so that both layers can
be removed simultaneously). Then, layer 20 is patterned
so as to form aperture 20a down to area 18c. As with
forming apertures in sacrificial layer 14, this can be done
with an additional layer of photoresist or layer 20 can be
directly patterned if the material is a photoresist or other
directly pattemable material. As can be seen in Fig. 5F
a plug or connection 22 is formed by depositing a preferably electrically conductive material on sacrificial layer
20, followed by chemical mechanical polishing, leaving
plug 22 connected to discrete area ("hinge") 18c. Then,
as can be seen in Fig. 5G, micromirror body 24 is formed
by depositing a (preferably conductive) layer followed by
patterning into the desired shape of the micromirror.
Many micromirror shapes are possible, such as that illustrated in Fig. 6A, and as will be discussed in further
detail herein. However, the micromirror shape in accordance with this example of the invention can have any
shape, including square or diamond as shown in Figs.
6B and 6C. Of course, those shapes that allow for tight
packing of micromirrors and thus a high fill factor are
preferred (such as the shape of the micromirror in Fig.
6A illustrated in a close fitting array in Fig. 7). Dotted line
62 in Fig. 6C (and later in Fig. 12) is the axis or rotation
of the micromirror.
[0064] For various layers used in making the micromirror in accordance with Figs. 5A to 5G are illustrated as
single layers, however, each layer (whether structural or
sacrificial) could be provided as a laminate e.g., one layer
of the laminate having improved mechanical performance and another layer having improved conductivity.
Also, though in the preferred embodiment the structural
materials are conductive, it is possible to make micromirror element 24 (or a layer within a laminate 24) conductive, as well as actuation electrodes 12d and 18b (and
layers/materials connecting electrodes 12d and 18b to
the semiconductor substrate). Furthermore, the materials disclosed above (metal, metal alloys, metal-ceramic
23
EP 1 553 437 B1
alloys, etc.) need not contain any metal, but could, for
example be silicon (e.g., polycrystalline silicon) or a compound of silicon (e.g., Si3N4, SiC, SiO2, etc.). If Si3N4
is used as a structural material and amorphous silicon is
used as the sacrificial material, xenon difluoride could be
utilized as a gas phase etchant in order to remove the
sacrificial amorphous silicon. If desired, the silicon or silicon compound (or other compound) used as a structural
material could be annealed before and/or after removing
the sacrificial layer to improve the stress characteristics
of the structural layer(s). Fig. 8 is an exploded view of
the micromirror formed in accordance with Figs. 5A to 5G.
[0065] One of the final steps in making the micromirror
is removing sacrificial layers 14 and 20. Fig. 9A is an
illustration of the micromirror after removal of the two
sacrificial layers, showing micromirror 24 connected to
substrate 10 via post 22, hinge 18c, post 16c and metal
areas 12c. The micromirror as shown in Fig. 9A is not
moved or deflected, as no voltages are applied to any
underlying electrodes (discrete metal areas formed in the
above-described process) e.g., electrodes 18b or 12d.
This non-deflected position is not the ’off’ position for the
micromirror, which for projection systems is generally the
furthest angle away from the ’on’ position (in order to
achieve the best contrast ratio for the projected image).
The ’on’ state of the micromirror, that is, the position of
the micromirror that deflects light into the acceptance
cone of the collection optics, is illustrated in Fig. 9B. A
voltage VA is applied to electrode 12d in order to electrostatically pull down micromirror plate 24 until the edge
of plate 24 impacts electrode 12e. Both micromirror plate
24 and electrode 12e are at the same potential, in this
example at a voltage of V0. As illustrated in Fig. 9C, when
a voltage VB is applied to electrode 18b, micromirror plate
24 deflects in an opposite direction, with its movement
being stopped by electrode 18a. Both electrode 18a and
micromirror plate 24 are at the same potential (in this
example a V0 voltage). Depending upon the size of electrode 18b vs. electrode 12d, and the distance between
these electrodes and the micromirror plate 24, the voltages applied to electrodes 18b and 12d need not be the
same. This deflected position illustrated in Fig. 9C is the
’off’ position, and deflects light furthest away from the
collection optics.
[0066] As can be seen by comparing Figs. 9B and 9C,
the off position forms a lower angle (with the substrate)
than the on position. Hereafter, when referring to the on
and off angles (or such angles relative to the substrate
or a non-deflected micromirror position), a sign of the
angle will be used (positive or negative relative to the
substrate or non-deflected position). The sign is arbitrary,
but signifies that the micromirrors rotate in one direction
to an ’on’ position and in an opposite direction to an ’off’
position. The benefits of such asymmetry will be discussed in further detail below. In one example of the invention, the on position is from 0 to +30 degrees and the
off position is from 0 to -30, with movement to the on
position being greater than movement to the off position.
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
13
24
For example, the on position could be from +10 to +30
degrees (or +12 to +20 degrees or +10 to +15 degrees)
and the off position could be greater than 0 and between
0 and -30 degrees (or within a smaller range of between
0 and -10 or -12, or from -1 to -12, or -1 to -10 or -11
degrees, or -2 to -7 degrees). In another example, the
micromirrors are capable of rotating at least +12 degrees
to the on position and between -4 and -10 degrees to the
off position. Depending upon the materials used for the
hinges, greater angles could be used achieved, such as
an on rotation from +10 to +35 degrees and an off rotation
from -2 to -25 degrees (of course materials fatigue and
creep can become an issue at very large angles). Not
taking into account the direction of rotation, it is preferred
that the on and off positions are at angles greater than 3
degrees but less than 30 degrees relative to the substrate, preferably the on position is greater than +10 degrees, and that the mirrors rotate 1 degree (or more) further in the on direction than in the opposite off direction.
[0067] Figs. 10A to 10D illustrate a further method and
micromirror structure. Variability in materials, layers, sacrificial etching, depositing of structural layers, etc. are as
above with respect to the previously described processes. For the method illustrated in Figs. 10A to 10D, the
substrate 40 could be either a light transmissive substrate
(to later be joined to a second substrate with circuitry and
electrodes) or a semiconductor substrate already having
circuitry and electrodes thereon. In the present example
as will be seen in Figs. 11A to 11B, the circuitry and electrodes are formed on a separate substrate.
[0068] In Fig. 10A, a sacrificial layer 42 is deposited
and patterned so as to form aperture 43. Then, as illustrated in Fig. 10B, plug 46 is formed (preferably as in the
process of Fig. 5A to 5G - deposit a metal, metal alloy or
other conductive layer and planarize (e.g., by CMP) to
form the plug). Then, as can be seen in Fig. 10C, a hinge
50 is formed by depositing an electrically conductive material (having suitable amorphousness, elasticity, hardness, strength, etc.). In the present example, the hinge
(and/or micromirror) is an early transition metal silicon
nitride such as Ta-Si-N, a late transition metal silicon nitride such as Co-Si-N or a metal or metal-ceramic alloy
such as a titanium aluminum alloy, or a titanium aluminum
oxide alloy. After depositing such a material, a photoresist is deposited and patterned so as to allow for etching/
removal of all areas except for the hinge areas 50. Then,
as can be seen in Fig. 10D, micromirror plate 44 is formed
by first protecting the hinges with photoresist and then
depositing and patterning a hinge structure layer so as
to form micromirror plate 44 partially overlapping and
therefore connecting with hinge 50. As in the other embodiments, an array of thousands or millions of such micromirrors is formed at the same time in an array.
[0069] Then, whether at the wafer or die level, the substrate with micromirrors is attached to a substrate with
actuation circuitry and electrodes. There should be at
least two electrodes per micromirror in the present example, one for each direction of deflection, and preferably
25
EP 1 553 437 B1
a third for allowing the micromirror to stop movement (in
one of the directions) by hitting a material at the same
potential as the micromirror itself. The second substrate
60 with electrodes 72 and 74 for deflecting the micromirror, and a landing pad or electrode 70, is illustrated in
Fig. 11A. The micromirror is in a non-deflected position
in Fig. 11A. When a voltage VA is applied to electrode
72, micromirror 44 is deflected until it impacts electrode
70 (Fig 11B). This is the ’on’ position of the micromirror
that allows light to enter into the collection optics of the
system. It is possible to design the gap between the substrates so that the ends of micromirror plate 44 impact
electrode 70 and substrate 40 at the same time. When
a voltage VB is applied to electrode 74, micromirror plate
44 deflects in the opposite direction until the end of the
micromirror impacts substrate 40. This is the ’off’ position
of the micromirror (Fig. 11C). Due to the position of the
hinge 50 and post 46, the angle of the micromirror in this
’off’ position is less than the angle of the micromirror in
the ’on’ position. An array of such micromirrors is illustrated in Fig. 12, and an exploded view of a micromirror
made in accordance with the process of Figs. 10A to 10D
is shown in Fig. 13.
[0070] Fig. 14A is a cross sectional view of multiple
micromirrors within an array where micromirrors in their
’off’ state are not deflected (group 100) whereas micromirrors in their ’on’ state (group 102) are moved from the
flat state so as to project light where the light can be
viewed (directly, on a target within a unitary device,
across a room onto a screen, etc.). Such a micromirror
array arrangement is better illustrated in Figs. 14B and
14C. As can be seen in Fig. 14B, in the micromirrors’ ’on’
state, an incoming cone of light 50 is reflected off of the
micromirrors (all micromirrors are ’on’ in this figure) and
light is projected away as a cone of light 52 into output
aperture 60, and in most cases will proceed to an imaging
system (e.g., a projection lens or lenses). Cone 54 represents specular reflection from the transparent cover.
Fig. 14C is an illustration of the micromirrors in their ’off’
state, where cone 52 represents light reflected from the
micromirrors in this ’off’ state. The incident and reflected
cones of light will narrow onto the entire array, though in
these figures, for ease of illustration, the cones of light
are shown as tapering onto an individual micromirror.
[0071] The arrangement of Figs. 14B and 14C has the
benefit that when the micromirrors are in their ’off’ (nondeflected) state, little light is able to travel through the
gaps between the micromirrors and cause undesirable
"gap scatter". However, as shown in Fig. 14C, diffracted
light is caused by the repeating pattern of the micromirrors (light 61a and 61b that extends beyond the cone of
reflected ’off’ light 52). This undesirable light is caused
by scattering or diffraction from the edges of the micromirrors ("edge scatter"). In particular, because the incoming cone of light (and thus the outgoing cones of light) is
made as large as possible so as to increase efficiency,
diffraction light such as light 61 a that extends beyond
the cone of reflected ’off’ light can enter the output aper-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
14
26
ture 60 (e.g., collection optics) and undesirably decrease
contrast ratio.
[0072] In order to avoid this "overlap" of ’off’ state light
(including diffraction light) and ’on’ state light that decreases contrast ratio, the ’off’ state light and ’on’ state
light can be separated further from each other by deflecting micromirrors for both the ’on’ and ’off’ states. As can
be seen in Fig. 15A, if the micromirror is deflected in its
’off’ state as illustrated in this figure, some light will be
properly reflected off of the micromirrors far away from
the ’on’ state direction (e.g., collection optics) as shown
as ray 116. Other light 112 will not hit on a micro-mirror,
but will scatter on the top surface of the lower substrate
(e.g., on lower circuitry and electrodes) and enter into
the collection optics even though the adjacent micromirror is in the ’off’ state. Or, as can be seen by ray 114, the
incoming light could hit a micromirror, yet still result in
gap scatter rather than being properly directed in the ’off’
angle like ray 116. This ’on’ arrangement as illustrated
in Fig. 15B is the same as in Fig. 14B. However, as illustrated in Fig. 15C, the ’off’ state along with diffraction 61a
caused by micromirror periodicity, is moved further away
from the ’on’ angle so as to result in improved contrast
ratio due to diffraction/edge scatter (though decreased
contrast ratio due to gap scatter, as mentioned above).
[0073] An improved micromirror array would maximize
the distance between the ’off’ light cone and the ’on’ light
cone (minimize edge scatter into the acceptance cone),
yet minimize gaps between adjacent micromirrors (minimize gap scatter). One solution that has been tried has
been to provide a micromirror array with micromirrors
that deflect in opposite directions for the ’on’ and ’off’
states as in Figs. 15A to 15C, and provide a light absorbing layer under the micromirrors so as to decrease gap
scatter. Unfortunately, this increases process complexity, or absorbs light onto the micromirror array assembly
(onto the light valve), which increases the temperature
of the light valve and causes problems due to thermal
expansion, increased fatigue or droop of micromirror
structures, increased breakdown of passivation films,
self assembled monolayers and/or lubricants, etc.
[0074] As can be seen in Figs. 16A to 16C micromirrors
are provided that are deflected in both their ’on’ and ’off’
states, yet at different deflection angles. As can be seen
in Fig. 16A micromirrors 100 are deflected in an ’off’ state
that is at a deflection angle less than micromirrors 102
in their ’on’ state (deflected in an opposite direction from
the flat or nondeflected position). As can be seen in Fig.
16B, the ’on’ state is unchanged (incoming light 50 projected as outgoing light 52 into output aperture 60), with
some specular reflection 54. In Fig. 16C, micromirrors
are in their ’off’ state in a sufficiently deflected position
such that edge scattering light 61 a that passes into output aperture 60 is minimized, yet deflected only so much
as to keep such edge scattering light out of the acceptance cone so as to minimize gap scattering light from
under the micromirrors due to a large off state deflection
angle.
27
EP 1 553 437 B1
[0075] An additional feature of the invention is in the
packaging of the device. As mentioned above, reflection
off of the light transmissive substrate can result in specular reflection. As can be seen in Fig. 17A, incoming light
cone 50 reflects off of micromirrors in their on position,
illustrated as reflected cone 52. Specular light reflected
from a surface of the light transmissive substrate 32 is
illustrated as light cone 54. It is desirable in making a
projection system, to increase the distended angle of the
cone so as to increase etendue and projection system
efficiency. However, as can be seen in Fig. 17A, increasing the distended angle of cone 50 will result in increases
in the distended angles of cones 52 and 54 such that
specular reflection light from cone 54 will enter the output
aperture 60, even if the micromirrors are in their ’off’ state
(thus reducing contrast ratio).
[0076] In order to allow for larger distended angles of
cones of light yet avoid specular reflection entering the
output aperture, as can be seen in Fig. 17B, light transmissive substrate 32 is placed at an angle relative to substrate 30. In many cases, substrate 30 is the substrate
upon which the micromirrors (or other optical MEMS elements) are formed, whereas substrate 32 is a light transmissive window in a package for the optical MEMS device. The angle of the window is greater than -1 degree
(the minus sign in keeping with the directions of the angles or the micromirrors). In one example, the window is
at an angle of from -2 to -15 degrees, or in the range of
from -3 to -10 degrees. In any event, the window is at an
angle relative to the micromirror substrate that is preferably in the same "direction" as the off position of the micromirrors (relative to the micromirror substrate and/or
package bottom). As can be seen in Fig. 17B, when the
micromirrors are in the ’on’ state, there is a gap between
the light reflected as light from ’on’ micromirrors (light
reflectance cone 52) and specular reflection light (light
cone 54). This "gap" is due to specular reflection cone
54 being reflected at a greater distance due to the angled
light transparent substrate. This arrangement allows, as
can be seen in Fig. 17C, for increasing the distended
angle of the incident light cone (and the corresponding
reflectance light cones) from the ’on’ micromirrors (cone
52) and the light transparent substrate (cone 54). (For
ease of illustration, the reflectance point of the light cones
is midway between the micromirror and the light transmissive substrate, though in reality light cone 52 reflects
from the micromirror(s) and specular reflection cone 54
reflects from the substrate 32.) The angled light transmissive window as illustrated in Figs. 17B and 17C allow
for larger throughput, greater system efficiency, greater
light value etendue (etendue = solid angle times area).
A light valve such as illustrated in Figs. 17B and 17C is
capable of modulating a larger etendue light beam and
can pass through more light from a light source and is
thus more efficient).
[0077] A packaged device is illustrated in Figs. 17D
and 17E. As can be seen in Fig. 17D, incoming light 40
(this view is reversed from previous views) is incident on
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
15
28
the array and reflected therefrom. As can be seen in Fig.
17E, an angled light transmissive substrate 32 (with mask
areas 34a and 34b) not only allows for increased light
cone distended angles as noted above, but in addition a
gap between the mask of window 32 and the micromirror
array is minimized, thus reducing light scattering and
temperature build-up in the package. The angle of the
light transmissive window is from 1 to 15 degrees relative
to the substrate, preferably from 2 to 15 degrees, or even
from 3 to 10 degrees. As can be seen in Figs. 17D to
17E, bond wires 37 at one end of the substrate in the
package (electrically connecting the substrate to the
package for actuation of the micromirrors - or other micromechanical element) are disposed where the angled
window is at a greater distance than at an opposite end
of the substrate. Thus, the angled window allows for the
presence of bond wires, yet allows for a minimized distance between the light transmissive window and the micromirror substrate at an end of the substrate where there
are no bond wires. Note that light is incident on the micromirror array from a side of the package corresponding
to the position of the bond wires and elevated side of the
angled window. Additional components that could be
present in the package are package adhesives, molecular scavengers or other getters, a source of stiction reducing agent (e.g. chlorosilanes, perfluorinated n-alkanoic acids, hexamethyldisilazane, etc.).
[0078] If the micromirrors of the present invention are
for a projection display, there should be a suitable light
source that illuminates the array and projects the image
via collection optics to a target. The arrangement of light
source and incident light beam to the array, and to each
micromirror, which allows for the improved contrast ratio
while minimizing projection system footprint, in the
present invention, can be seen in Figs. 18 and 19a to
19c. As can be seen in Fig. 18, a light source 114 directs
a beam of light 116 at a 90 degree angle to the leading
side 93 of the active area of the array (the active area of
the array illustrated as rectangle 94 in the figure). The
active area 94 would typically have from 64,000 to about
2,000,000 pixels in a usually rectangular array such as
illustrated in Fig.18. The active area 94 reflects light (via
’on’ state micromirrors) through collection optics 115 to
a target to form a corresponding rectangular image on
the target (e.g., wall or screen). Of course, the array could
be a shape other than rectangular and would result in a
corresponding shape on the target (unless passed
through a mask). Light from light source 114 reflects off
of particular micromirrors (those in the ’on’ state) in the
array, and passes through optics 115 (simplified as two
lenses for clarity). Micromirrors in their ’off’ state (in a
non-deflected "rest" state), direct light to area 99 in Fig.
18. Fig. 18 is a simplification of a projection system that
could have additional components such as TIR prisms,
additional focusing or magnification lenses, a color wheel
for providing a color image, a light pipe, etc. as are known
in the art. Of course, if the projection system is for maskless lithography or non-color applications other than one
29
EP 1 553 437 B1
for projection of a color image (e.g. front or rear screen
projection TV, a computer monitor, etc.), then a color
wheel and different collection optics could be used. And,
a target may not be a screen or photoresist, but could be
a viewer’s retina as for a direct view display. As can be
seen in Fig. 18, all ’on’ micromirrors in the array direct
light together to a single collection optic, which can be
one lens or a group of lenses for directing/focusing/projecting the light to a target.
[0079] Whether the viewed image is on a computer,
television or movie screen, the pixels on the screen image
(each pixel on the viewed or projected image corresponding to a micromirror element in the array) have sides that
are not parallel to at least two of the four sides defining
the rectangular screen image. As can be seen in one
example of a micromirror element in Figs. 19 A-E, the
incident light beam does not impinge perpendicularly on
any sides of the micro-mirror element. Fig. 19A is a perspective view of light hitting a single micromirror element,
whereas Fig. 19B is a top view and Fig. 19C is a side
view. The incident light beam may be from 10 to 50 degrees (e.g., 20 degrees) from normal (to the micromirror/
array plane). See angle 133 in Fig.19C.
[0080] Regardless of the angle of the incident light
beam from the plane of the micromirror, no micromirror
sides will be perpendicular to the light beam incident thereon (see Fig. 19D). In a preferred embodiment, the micromirror sides should be disposed at an angle (131) less
than 80 degrees or preferably 55 degree or less in relation
to the incident light beam axis projection on the micromirror plane (102), more preferably 45 degrees or less,
and most preferably 40 degrees or less. Conversely, angle 132 should be 100 degrees or more, preferably 125
degrees or more, more preferably 135 degrees or more,
and most preferably 140 degrees or more. The switching
(i.e., rotational) axis of the micromirror is labeled as dotted line 103 in Fig. 19D. This switching axis could be in
other places along the micromirror, e.g., line 106, depending upon the type of hinges utilized. As can be seen
in Fig. 19D, the switching axis (e.g., 103 or 106) is perpendicular to the incident light beam 102 as projected
onto the plane of the micromirror. Fig. 19E, like 19D, is
a top view - however an array of micromirrors are illustrated in Fig. 19E along with an incident light beam 102
onto the 2-D array of micromirrors. Note that each micromirror in Fig. 19E has the shape of the micromirror illustrated in Figs. 19A-D. As can be seen in Fig. 19E, the
overall shape of the micromirror array is a rectangle. Each
of the four sides of the array, 117-120, is defined by drawing a line between the most remote pixels in the last row
and column of the active area (121-124) (e.g., side 119
being defined by a line intersecting corner pixels 123 and
122). Though it can be seen in Fig. 19E that each of the
"leading" (closest to the light source) and "trailing" (furthest from the light source) active area sides 119, 117 is
"jagged" due to the shape of the micromirrors in the active
area, it should be remembered that there could be up to
about 3,000,000 micromirrors or more in an area of from
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
16
30
1 cm2 to 1 in2. Therefore, unless under extreme magnification, the active area will be essentially rectangular,
with active area sides 118 and 120 (or 117 and 119)
parallel to micromirror sides 107 and 108 in Fig. 19D (the
micromirror in Fig. 19D being one of the micromirror elements within the active area of Fig. 19E); with active
area sides 117 and 119 (or 118 and 120) being parallel
to the switching axis 103 (or 106) of each micromirror
(see Fig.19D); and with active area sides 117 and 119
(or 118 and 120) being non-perpendicular to leading or
trailing sides 125a-d of the micromirrors (see Fig.19D).
Fig. 19E could also be seen as the projected image comprising a large number of projected pixels (each projected
pixel having the shape illustrated in Fig.19D). In accordance with the above, therefore, the projected image sides
118 and 120 (or 117 and 119) are parallel to projected
pixel sides 107 and 108, and projected image sides 117
and 119 (or 118 and 120) being non-perpendicular to
projected pixel sides 125a-d.
[0081] Fig. 20 is an illustration of a 2-D micromirror
array (of course with many fewer pixels than within the
typical active area). For ease of illustration (in Fig. 20 as
well as Figs. 21-26 and 29-32) fewer than 60 micromirrors/pixels are illustrated, though a typical display would
have from 64K pixels (320 x 200 pixels) to 1,920K pixels
(1600 x 1200 pixels = UXGA), or higher (e.g., 1920 x
1080 = HDTV; 2048 x 1536 = QXGA). Due to the very
small size of each pixel in the present invention, the resolution that can be achieved is essentially without limit.
As can be seen in Fig. 20, the sides of each pixel are
parallel to corresponding sides of the active area. Thus,
each micromirror side is either perpendicular or parallel
to the sides of the active area. In contrast, as illustrated
in Fig. 21, the micromirror sides are neither parallel nor
perpendicular to the active area sides. As will be seen
below, in other embodiments, some of the sides are neither parallel nor perpendicular to active area sides, and
some sides can be parallel to active area sides (as long
as also parallel to the direction of a line superimposed
on the plane of the micromirror from the incident light
beam).
[0082] The micromirror array as illustrated in Fig. 22
achieves high contrast ratio. However, the micromirror
arrangements such as illustrated in Figs. 23-29 simplify
the addressing scheme. More particularly, Figs. 23-29
have the advantage of not positioning the pixels on a
lattice aligned at an angle to the X and Y axes of the
array. As typical video image sources provide pixel color
data in an X-Y grid, the arrangement of pixels in Figs.
23-29 avoids non-trivial video preprocessing to render
an acceptable image on a display. Also the arrangement
of Figs, 23-29 avoids a more complicated layout of the
display backplane (in relation to Figs. 13 and 14, which
could require twice as many row or column wires to the
pixel controller cells). Horizontal line 80 in Fig. 22 connects the top row of micromirror elements, and vertical
lines 81A-D extend from each of these top row micromirrors (these horizontal and vertical lines corresponding to
31
EP 1 553 437 B1
addressing rows and columns in the array). As can be
seen in Fig. 22, only every other micromirror is connected
in this way. Thus, in order for all micromirrors to be addressed, twice as many rows and columns are needed,
thus resulting in added complexity in addressing the array. Fig. 22 also shows support posts 83 at the corners
of the micromirrors that support posts connect to hinges
(not shown) below each micromirror element (the "superimposed hinges" discussed hereinabove) and to an
optically transmissive substrate (not shown) above the
micromirror elements.
[0083] In a more preferred embodiment of the invention as shown in Fig. 23, an array 92 is provided. A light
beam 90 is directed at the array such that no micromirror
sides are perpendicular to the incident light beam. In Fig.
23, the leading sides of the micromirrors (relative to incident light beam 90) are at an angle of about 135 degrees
to the incident light beam (90). It is preferred that this
angle be greater than 100 degrees, preferably greater
than 130 degrees. The contrast ratio is further improved
if the angle between the incident light beam and the leading side is 135 degrees or more, and can even be 140
degrees or more. As can be seen in Fig. 23, the micromirror elements’ orientation does not result in addressing
issues as discussed above with respect to Fig. 22. Posts
95 connect to hinges (not shown) below each micromirror
element in Fig. 23. The hinges extend perpendicularly to
the direction of the incident light beam (and parallel to
the leading and trailing sides 91B and 91D of the active
areas). The hinges allow for an axis of rotation of the
micromirrors that is perpendicular to the incident light
beam.
[0084] Figure 24 is an illustration of micromirrors similar to that shown in Fig. 23. In Fig. 24, however, the
micromirror elements are "reversed" and have their "concave" portion as their leading side. Even though the micromirrors in Fig. 24 are reversed from that shown in Fig.
23, there are still no sides of the micromirrors that are
perpendicular to the incident light beam. Fig. 24 illustrates a hinge 101 disposed in the same plane as the
micromirror element to which the hinge is attached. Both
types of hinges are disclosed in the ’840 patent mentioned above. Fig. 25 likewise illustrates a hinge 110 in
the same plane as the micromirror array, and shows both
"convex" portions 112 ("protrusions") and "concave" portions 113 ("cut-outs") on the leading side of each micromirror. Due to the concave or cut-out portion of each micromirror, each micromirror is in a shape of a concave
polygon. Though the micromirrors can be convex polygons (if no sides of the convex polygonal micromirrors
are parallel to the leading side of the active area), it is
preferred that the micromirrors have a concave polygon
shape. Convex polygons are known as polygons where
no line containing a side can go through the interior of
the polygon. A polygon is concave if and only if it is not
a convex polygon. The concave polygon shape can be
in the form of a series of (non-rectangular) parallelograms, or with at least one concave and a matching at
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
17
32
least one convex portion (for fitting within the concave
portion of the adjacent micromirror), though any concave
polygon shape is possible. Though less preferred, as
mentioned above, the micromirror shape could also be
that of a single (non-rectangular) parallelogram. Though
not illustrated, the matching one or more protrusions and
one or more cut-outs need not be composed of straight
lines (nor any of the micromirror sides for that matter),
but instead could be curved. In one such embodiment,
the protrusion(s) and cut-out(s) are semicircular, though
the illustrated angular protrusions and cut-outs are preferred.
[0085] Figures 26A to 26F illustrate further embodiments of the invention. Though the shape of the micromirrors are different in each figure, each is the same in
that none has any sides perpendicular to the incident
light beam. Of course, when a micromirror side changes
direction, there is a point, however small, where the side
could be considered perpendicular, if only instantaneously. However, when it is stated that there are no sides
perpendicular, it is meant that there are no substantial
portions which are perpendicular, or at least no such substantial portions on the leading side and trailing side of
the micromirrors. Even if the direction of the leading sides
changed gradually (or a portion of the leading side is
perpendicular to the incident light beam, such as illustrated in Fig. 29), it is preferred that there would never
be more than of the leading side that is perpendicular
to the incident light beam, more preferably no more than
, and most preferably 1/10 or less. The lower the portion
of the leading side and trailing side that is perpendicular
to the incident light beam, the greater the improvement
in contrast ratio.
[0086] Many of the micromirror embodiments can be
viewed as an assembly of one or more parallelograms
(e.g., identical parallelograms). As can be seen in Figs.
27A, a single parallelogram is effective for decreasing
light diffraction as it has no sides perpendicular to the
incident light beam (the light beam having a direction
from the bottom to the top of the page and starting from
out of the plane of the page). Fig. 27A illustrates a single
parallelogram with a horizontal arrow indicating width "d"
of the parallelogram. The switching axis for the micromirror in Fig. 27A (and Figs. 27B to 27F) is also in this horizontal direction. For example, the switching axis could
be along the dotted line in Fig. 27A. Figs. 27B and 27C
show both two and three parallelogram micromirror designs, where each subsequent parallelogram has the
same shape, size and appearance as the one before.
This arrangement forms a "saw-tooth" leading and trailing side of the micromirror element. Figs. 27D to 27F
illustrate from 2 to 4 parallelograms. However, in Figs.
27D to 27F, each subsequent parallelogram is a micromirror image of the one before, rather than the same
image. This arrangement forms a "jagged side" on the
leading and trailing sides of the micromirror elements. It
should be noted that the parallelograms need not each
be of the same width, and a line connecting the tips of
33
EP 1 553 437 B1
the saw-tooth or jagged sides need not be perpendicular
to the incident light beam. The width of each parallelogram, if they are constructed to be of the same width, will
be "d" = M/N, where M is total micromirror width, N is the
number of parallelograms. With an increasing number of
parallelograms, the width "d" is decreasing (assuming
constant micromirror width). However, width "d" should
preferably be much larger than the wavelength of the
incident light. In order to keep the contrast ratio high, the
number of parallelograms N (or the number of times the
leading micromirror side changes direction) should be
less than or equal to 0.5 M/λ, or preferably less than or
equal to 0.2 M/λ, and even less than or equal to 0.1 M/
λ, where λ is the wavelength of the incident light. Though
the number of parallelograms is anywhere from 1 to 4 in
Fig.27, any number is possible, though 15 or fewer, and
preferably 10 or fewer result in better contrast ratio. The
numbers of parallelograms in Fig. 27 are most preferred
(4 or fewer).
[0087] As can be seen in Fig. 28, hinges (or flexures)
191, 193 are disposed in the same plane as micromirror
element 190. Incident light beam 195 from a light source
out of the plane of Fig. 28 impinges on leading sides of
micromirror 190, none of which are perpendicular. It is
preferred that no portion of the hinges be perpendicular
to the incident light beam, so as to decrease light diffraction in direction of micromirror switching.
[0088] Also, it should be noted that the "straight" micromirror sides that are illustrated as being parallel to
active area sides (e.g., micromirror sides 194, 196 in Fig.
28) can have other shapes as well. Fig. 21 above is one
example where there are no micromirror sides parallel
to incident light beam 85. Figs. 30 and 31 are further
examples where no micromirror sides are perpendicular
or parallel to the incident light beam, yet do not have the
increased addressing complexity as that of Fig. 22. Incident light can be directed substantially perpendicularly
to any of the four active area sides in Fig. 30 (see arrows
1-4) and not be incident perpendicularly on any micromirror sides. This unique feature is also present in the
array illustrated in Fig. 31. It is also possible to have part
of the leading edge of each micromirror perpendicular to
the incident light beam and part not perpendicular as can
be seen in Fig. 29.
[0089] Figures 32A to 32J illustrate possible hinges for
the micromirrors of the present invention. Similar to Fig.
24, Fig. 32A illustrates micromirrors with flexures 96 extending parallel to the incident light beam (when viewed
as a top view as in this figure) and connecting micromirror
97 to support post 98 which holds the micromirror element on the substrate. Incident light could be directed at
the array in the direction of arrows 5 or 6 in Fig. 32A (as
viewed from above). Of course the incident light would
originate out of plane (see Figs. 11A to 11E). Such incident light would be the same for Figs. 32B to 32L. Figs.
32C to 32E are further embodiments of this type of hinge.
Figs. 32F to 32L are illustrations of further hinge and micromirror embodiments where, except for Fig. 32J, the
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
18
34
hinges do not extend parallel to the incident light beam
(or leading active area side) and yet can still result in the
micromirrors rotating around an axis of rotation perpendicular to the incident light beam.
[0090] When micromirror sides that are parallel to the
rotation axis of the micromirror (and perpendicular to the
incident light beam) are not minimized, light diffracted by
such micro-mirror sides, will pass through the collection
optics even if the micromirror is in ’off’ state, thus reducing
the contrast ratio. As can be seen in Fig. 33A, a diffraction
pattern (caused by illuminating an array of substantially
square micromirrors such as that of Fig. 20 at an angle
of 90 degree to the leading side of the array) in the shape
of a "+" intersects the acceptance cone (the circle in the
figure). The diffraction pattern can be seen in this figure
as a series of dark dots (with a corresponding lighter
background) that form one vertical and one horizontal
line, and which cross just below the acceptance cone
circle shown as a circular solid black line superposed
onto the diffraction pattern). Though not shown, in the
micromirror’s ’on’ state, the two diffraction lines would
cross within the acceptance cone circle. Therefore, as
can be seen in Fig. 33A, the vertical diffraction line will
enter the acceptance cone of the collection optics even
when the micromirror is in the ’off’ state, thus harming
the contrast ratio. Fig. 33B is a diffraction pattern caused
by illuminating an array of square micromirrors at a 45
degree angle. As can be seen in Fig. 33B, diffraction light
passing into the acceptance cone (the small solid black
circle in Fig. 33B) is reduced compared to Fig. 33A. However, as mentioned above, though diffraction can be reduced by such an illumination, other problems arise.
[0091] In contrast, as can be seen in Fig. 33C, the diffraction pattern of the present invention (micromirror from
Fig. 28 in ’off’ state) does not have a diffraction line extending though the collection optics acceptance cone, or
otherwise to the spatial region where light is directed
when the micromirror is in the ’on’ state. Thus substantially no diffracted light is passed to the area where light
is passed when the micromirror is in the ’on’ state. A
micromirror array producing such a diffraction pattern,
with illumination light orthogonal to the sides of the active
area of the array (and/or orthogonal to the columns or
rows) is new. Likewise, the micromirror designs, hinges
therefore, and arrangement of light source to the micromirrors, active area sides and/or addressing rows and
columns are also new. The invention has been described
in terms of specific embodiments. Nevertheless, persons
familiar withe field will appreciate that many variations
exist in light of the embodiments described herein. For
example, the micromirror shapes of the present invention
could be used for micromirrors in an optical switch (e.g.,
such as disclosed in US Patent Application 09/617,149
and US Provisional Patent Application 60/231,041) in order to decrease diffraction in the switch. In addition, the
micromirrors of the present invention can be made in
accordance with structures and methods, such as those
set forth in US Patent Application 09/767,632, US Patent
35
EP 1 553 437 B1
Application 09/631,536, US Patent Application
60/293,092, and US Patent Application 06/637,479. Also, though a standard red/green/blue or red/green/blue/
white color wheel could be used in a projection display
incorporating the micromirrors of the present invention,
other color wheels could be used, such as disclosed in
US Provisional Patent Applications 60/267,648 and
60/266,780.
[0092] Also, the present invention is suited for a method utilizing a removable (and replaceable) substrate for
singulation and assembly purposes such as set forth in
US Provisional Patent Application 60/276,222. In addition, the micromirrors of the present invention can be
actuated within an array by pulse width modulation such
as set forth in US Patent Application 09/564,069. Furthermore, if interhalogens or noble gas fluorides are used
as etchants for the release of the micromirrors, methods
could be used such as set forth in US Patent Applications
09/427,841 and 09/649,569. Or, the sacrificial materials
and the methods for removing them could be those set
forth in US Patent Application 60/298,529. In addition,
other structural materials could be used, such as the
MEMS materials set forth in US patent application
60/228,007 and US patent application 60/300,533.
[0093] Throughout the present application structures
or layers are disclosed as being "on" (or deposited on),
or over, above, adjacent, etc. other structures or layers.
It should be recognized that this is meant to mean directly
or indirectly on, over, above, adjacent, etc., as it will be
recognized in the art that a variety of intermediate layers
or structures could be interposed, including but not limited to sealant layers, adhesion promotion layers, electrically conductive layers, layers for reducing stiction, etc.
In the same way, structures such as substrate or layer
can be as a laminate due to additional structures or layers. Also, when the phrase "at least one" or "one or more"
(or similar) is used, it is for emphasizing the potential
plural nature of that particular structure or layer, however
this phraseology should in no way imply the lack of potential plurality of other structures or layers that are not
set forth in this way. In the same way, when the phrase
"directly or indirectly" is used, it should in no way restrict,
in places where this phrase is not used, the meaning
elsewhere to either directly or indirectly. Also, "MEMS",
"micromechanical" and "micro electromechanical" are
used interchangeably herein and the structure may or
may not have an electrical component. Lastly, unless the
word "means" in a "means for" phrase is specifically set
forth in the claims, it is not intended that any elements in
the claims be interpreted in accordance with the specific
rules relating to "means for" phraseology.
wherein the micromirrors (24; 44) are positioned
above circuitry and electrodes (12a-e; 18a-c; 70, 72)
for electrostatically actuating the micromirrors (24;
44);
wherein the micromirrors (24; 44) are four-sided and
have no sides parallel to sides of the die;
wherein the micromirror array is rectangular and has
an area of from 1 cm2 to (2.54 cm)2 ;
wherein a horizontal row of micromirrors (24; 44) extends corner to corner in the row parallel to a side of
the array, and wherein vertical lines (81a-d) corresponding to addressing columns extend from each
micromirror (24; 44) in the row and connect to every
other row of micromirrors (24; 44); and
wherein a vertical column of micromirrors (24; 44)
extends corner to corner in the column parallel to a
side of the array, and wherein horizontal lines (80)
corresponding to addressing rows extend from each
micromirror (24; 44) in the column and connect to
every other column of micromirrors (24; 44); and
wherein a plurality of row wires and column wires
are provided for addressing the micromirrors (24; 44)
and where the number of row wires times the number
of column wires is greater than the number of micromirrors (24; 44).
5
10
15
20
25
2.
The die of claim 1, wherein the number of row wires
times the number of column wires is twice the
number of micromirrors (24; 44).
3.
The die of claim 1, wherein the number of micromirrors (24; 44) is from 1,920,000 to 3,145,278.
4.
The die of claim 1, wherein the array of micromirrors
(24; 44) comprises 1600 x 1200 micromirrors (24;
44).
5.
The die of claim 1, wherein the array of micromirrors
(24; 44) comprises 1920 x 1080 micromirrors (24;
44).
6.
The die of claim 1, wherein an axis of rotation of the
micromirrors (24; 44) is parallel to a side of the die.
7.
The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
are square.
8.
The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
are positioned on a lattice aligned at an angle to the
X and Y axes of the die.
9.
The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
comprise micromirror plates (24) that are connected
via hinges (50, 120a, 120b) to a substrate (10; 13;
30; 40), and wherein the substrate (10; 13; 30; 40),
micromirror plates (24) and hinges (50, 120a, 120b)
are disposed in different planes.
30
35
40
45
50
Claims
55
1.
36
A die singulated from a wafer and having an array
of micromirrors (24; 44) in a two dimensional arrangement formed thereon;
19
37
EP 1 553 437 B1
10. The die of claim 9, wherein a first gap is defined
between the hinge (50, 120a, 120b) and the micromirror plate (24), and a second gap is defined between the micromirror plate (24) and the substrate
(10; 13; 30; 40).
11. The die of claim 9, wherein a first gap is defined
between the substrate (10; 13; 30; 40) and the hinge
(50, 120a, 120b) and a second gap is defined between the hinge (50, 120a, 120b) and the micromirror
plate (24).
12. The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
are formed on a substrate (10; 13; 30; 40) adjacent
circuitry and electrodes, at least two electrodes are
disposed adjacent each micromirror (24; 44), one
electrode for electrostatically pulling the adjacent micromirror (24; 44) to an off position, and another electrode for electrostatically pulling the adjacent micromirror (24; 44) to an on position.
18a - c; 70, 72) zum elektrostatischen Betätigen der
Mikrospiegel (24; 44) angeordnet sind,
wobei die Mikrospiegel (24; 44) vierseitig sind und
keine Seiten aufweisen, die parallel zu Seiten des
Chips verlaufen,
wobei das Mikrospiegelfeld rechteckig ist und eine
Fläche von 1 cm2 bis (2,54 cm)2 aufweist,
wobei sich eine horizontale Zeile von Mikrospiegeln
(24; 44) von Ecke zu Ecke in der zu einer Seite des
Felds parallelen Zeile erstreckt und wobei sich vertikale Linien (81a - d), die Adressierungsspalten entsprechen, von jedem Mikrospiegel (24; 44) in der
Zeile erstrecken und mit jeder zweiten Zeile von Mikrospiegeln (24; 44) verbinden, und
wobei sich eine vertikale Spalte von Mikrospiegeln
(24; 44) von Ecke zu Ecke in der zu einer Seite des
Felds parallelen Spalte erstreckt und wobei sich horizontale Linien (80), die Adressierungszeilen entsprechen, von jedem Mikrospiegel (24; 44) in der
Spalte erstrecken und mit jeder zweiten Spalte von
Mikrospiegeln (24; 44) verbinden, und
wobei mehrere Zeilendrähte und Spaltendrähte zum
Adressieren der Mikrospiegel (24; 44) bereitgestellt
sind und die Anzahl der Zeilendrähte, multipliziert
mit der Anzahl der Spaltendrähte, größer ist als die
Anzahl der Mikrospiegel (24; 44).
5
10
15
20
13. The die of claim 1, wherein the circuitry and electrodes are formed on the same substrate (10; 13;
30; 40) as the micromirrors (24; 44).
25
14. The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
are tiled together.
15. The die of claim 1, wherein each micromirror (24;
44) has a switching axis substantially parallel to at
least one side of the array.
2.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Anzahl der Zeilendrähte, multipliziert mit der Anzahl der Spaltendrähte, zwei Mal so groß ist wie die Anzahl der Mikrospiegel (24; 44).
3.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Anzahl der Mikrospiegel (24; 44) von 1920000 bis 3145278 reicht.
4.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Feld von Mikrospiegeln (24; 44) 1600 x 1200 Mikrospiegel (24; 44)
aufweist.
5.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Feld von Mikrospiegeln (24; 44) 1920 x 1080 Mikrospiegel (24; 44)
aufweist.
6.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei eine Drehachse der
Mikrospiegel (24; 44) parallel zu einer Seite des
Chips verläuft.
7.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) quadratisch sind.
8.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) auf einem Gitter angeordnet sind, das unter einem Winkel zur X- und zur Y-Achse des Chips ausgerichtet ist.
9.
Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) Mikrospiegelplatten (24) aufweisen, die über Gelenke (50, 120a, 120b) mit einem Substrat (10; 13;
30
16. The die of claim 9, wherein the thickness of the micromirror plate (24) is from 200 to 7300 angstroms.
38
35
17. The die of claim 1, wherein the micromirrors (24; 44)
are connected via underlying hinges (50, 120a,
120b) to a substrate (10; 13; 30; 40) by means of an
electrically conductive material that is aluminum, a
metal alloy or a conductive ceramic compound.
18. The die of any of claims 1 to 17, wherein the die
comprises a substrate (10; 13; 30; 40) on which is
formed a movable reflective or diffractive micromechanical device and a package for holding the substrate (10; 13; 30; 40) with the movable micromechanical device; wherein the package comprises an
optically transmissive window.
40
45
50
Patentansprüche
1.
Chip, der durch Vereinzeln eines Wafers erzeugt
wurde und auf dem ein Feld von Mikrospiegeln (24;
44) in einer zweidimensionalen Anordnung ausgebildet ist,
wobei die Mikrospiegel (24; 44) oberhalb einer
Schaltungsanordnung und von Elektroden (12a - e;
55
20
39
EP 1 553 437 B1
30; 40) verbunden sind, und wobei das Substrat (10;
13; 30; 40), die Mikrospiegelplatten (24) und die Gelenke (50, 120a, 120b) in verschiedenen Ebenen angeordnet sind.
40
beweglichen mikromechanischen Vorrichtung aufweist, wobei das Gehäuse ein optisch durchlässiges
Fenster aufweist.
5
10. Chip nach Anspruch 9, wobei ein erster Zwischenraum zwischen dem Gelenk (50, 120a, 120b) und
der Mikrospiegelplatte (24) ausgebildet ist und ein
zweiter Zwischenraum zwischen der Mikrospiegelplatte (24) und dem Substrat (10; 13; 30; 40) ausgebildet ist.
11. Chip nach Anspruch 9, wobei ein erster Zwischenraum zwischen dem Substrat (10; 13; 30; 40) und
dem Gelenk (50, 120a, 120b) ausgebildet ist und ein
zweiter Zwischenraum zwischen dem Gelenk (50,
120a, 120b) und der Mikrospiegelplatte (24) ausgebildet ist.
12. Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) auf einem Substrat (10; 13; 30; 40) angrenzend
an die Schaltungsanordnung und Elektroden ausgebildet sind und mindestens zwei Elektroden angrenzend an jeden Mikrospiegel (24; 44) angeordnet
sind, wobei die eine Elektrode dazu dient, den benachbarten Mikrospiegel (24; 44) elektrostatisch zu
einer Ausschaltposition zu ziehen, und die andere
Elektrode dazu dient, den benachbarten Mikrospiegel (24; 44) elektrostatisch zu einer Einschaltposition
zu ziehen.
13. Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Schaltungsanordnung und Elektroden auf demselben Substrat (10;
13; 30; 40) wie die Mikrospiegel (24; 44) ausgebildet
sind.
Revendications
1.
Puce séparée d’une plaquette et comportant une
matrice de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) disposés en une
configuration à deux dimensions ;
dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24 ; 44) sont positionnés au- dessus d’un ensemble de circuits et
d’électrodes (12a à e ; 18a à c ; 70,72) pour activer
de manière électrostatique les micromiroirs (24, 44) ;
dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24 ;44) ont quatre côtés dont aucun n’est parallèle aux côtés de la puce ;
dans laquelle la matrice de micromiroirs est rectangulaire et dont l’aire est comprise entre 1 cm2 et 2,54
cm2 ;
dans laquelle une rangée horizontale de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) s’étend coin à coin dans la rangée
parallèle à un côté de la matrice, et dans laquelle
des lignes verticales (81a à d) correspondant aux
colonnes d’adressage partent de chaque micromiroir (24 ; 44) de la rangée et se connectent à chaque
deuxième rangée de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) ; et
dans laquelle une colonne verticale de micromiroirs
(24 ; 44) s’étend coin à coin dans la colonne parallèle
à un côté de la matrice et dans laquelle des lignes
horizontales (80) correspondant aux rangées
d’adressage partent de chaque micromiroir (24 ; 44)
de la colonne et se connectent à chaque deuxième
colonne de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) ; et
dans laquelle une pluralité de fils de rangées et de
fils de colonnes est prévue pour adresser les micromiroirs (24 ; 44) et où le nombre de fils de rangées
fois le nombre de fils de colonnes est supérieur au
nombre de micromiroirs (24 ; 44).
40
2.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle le nombre de fils de rangées fois le nombre de fils de colonnes est égal au double du nombre de micromiroirs
(24 ; 44).
45
3.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle le nombre de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) est compris entre 1 920
000 et 3 145 278.
4.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la matrice de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) comporte 1600 x 1200
micromiroirs (24 ; 44).
5.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle la matrice de micromiroirs (24 ; 44) comporte 1920 x 1080
micromiroirs (24 ; 44).
6.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle un axe
de rotation des micromiroirs (24 ; 44) est parallèle à
10
15
20
25
30
35
14. Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) fliesenartig aneinander gelegt sind.
15. Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei jeder Mikrospiegel (24;
44) eine Schaltachse aufweist, die im Wesentlichen
parallel zu mindestens einer Seite des Felds verläuft.
16. Chip nach Anspruch 9, wobei die Dicke der Mikrospiegelplatte (24) von 200 bis 7300 Angstrom reicht.
17. Chip nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Mikrospiegel (24;
44) über darunter liegende Gelenke (50, 120a, 120b)
durch ein elektrisch leitfähiges Material, das Aluminium, eine Metalllegierung oder eine leitfähige Keramikverbindung ist, mit einem Substrat (10; 13; 30;
40) verbunden sind.
18. Chip nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 17, welcher
ein Substrat (10; 13; 30; 40), auf dem eine bewegliche reflektierende oder diffraktive mikromechanische Vorrichtung ausgebildet ist, und ein Gehäuse
zum Halten des Substrats (10; 13; 30; 40) mit der
50
55
21
41
EP 1 553 437 B1
un côté de la puce.
7.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24 ; 44) sont carrés.
5
8.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24 ; 44) sont positionnés sur un treillis
alignés selon un angle avec les axes X et Y de la
puce.
10
9.
Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24 ; 44) comportent des plaques de micromiroir (24) connectées par l’intermédiaire d’articulations (50, 120a, 120b) à un substrat (10 ; 13 ;
30 ; 40) et dans laquelle le substrat (10 ; 13 ; 30 ;
40), les plaques de micromiroir (24) et les articulations (50, 120a, 120b) sont placés dans des plans
différents.
10. Puce selon la revendication 9, dans laquelle un premier espace est défini entre l’articulation (50, 120a,
120b) et la plaque de micromiroir (24) et un deuxième
espace est défini entre la plaque de micromiroir (24)
et le substrat (10 ; 13 ; 30 ; 40).
15
20
25
11. Puce selon la revendication 9, dans laquelle un premier espace est défini entre le substrat (10 ; 13 ; 30 ;
40) et l’articulation (50, 120a, 120b) et un deuxième
espace est défini entre l’articulation (50, 120a, 120b)
et la plaque de micromiroir (24).
12. Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24; 44) sont formés sur un substrat (10 ;
13 ; 30 ; 40) adjacent à des circuits et des électrodes,
au moins deux électrodes sont placées adjacents à
chaque micromiroir (24 ; 44), une électrode pour attirer de façon électrostatique le micromiroir adjacent
(24 ;44) en une position inactive, et l’autre électrode
pour attirer de façon électrostatique le micromiroir
adjacent (24 ;44) en une position active.
30
35
40
13. Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les circuits et les électrodes sont formés sur le même substrat (10 ; 13 ; 30 ; 40) que les micromiroirs (24 ; 44).
45
14. Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les micromiroirs (24; 44) sont configurés ensemble en mosaïque.
15. Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle chaque
micromiroir (24 ; 44) a un axe de commutation sensiblement parallèle à au moins un côté de la matrice.
16. Puce selon la revendication 9, dans laquelle l’épaisseur de la plaque de micromiroir (24) est comprise
entre 200 et 7300 angstrôms.
50
55
17. Puce selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les mi-
22
42
cromiroirs (24 ; 44) sont connectés par l’intermédiaire d’articulations sous-jacentes (50, 120a, 120b) à
un substrat (10; 13; 30; 40) au moyen d’un matériau
électriquement conducteur qui est de l’aluminium,
un alliage métallique ou un composé céramique conducteur.
18. Puce selon l’une quelconque des revendications 1
à 17, dans laquelle la puce comporte un substrat
(10 ; 13 ; 30 ; 40) sur lequel est formé un dispositif
micromécanique mobile réflecteur ou diffracteur et
un système de maintien du substrat (10 ; 13 ; 30 ;
40) avec le dispositif micromécanique mobile ; dans
laquelle le système comprend une fenêtre de transmission optique.
EP 1 553 437 B1
23
EP 1 553 437 B1
24
EP 1 553 437 B1
25
EP 1 553 437 B1
26
EP 1 553 437 B1
27
EP 1 553 437 B1
28
EP 1 553 437 B1
29
EP 1 553 437 B1
30
EP 1 553 437 B1
31
EP 1 553 437 B1
32
EP 1 553 437 B1
33
EP 1 553 437 B1
34
EP 1 553 437 B1
35
EP 1 553 437 B1
36
EP 1 553 437 B1
37
EP 1 553 437 B1
38
EP 1 553 437 B1
39
EP 1 553 437 B1
40
EP 1 553 437 B1
41
EP 1 553 437 B1
42
EP 1 553 437 B1
43
EP 1 553 437 B1
44
EP 1 553 437 B1
45
EP 1 553 437 B1
46
EP 1 553 437 B1
47
EP 1 553 437 B1
48
EP 1 553 437 B1
49
EP 1 553 437 B1
50
EP 1 553 437 B1
51
EP 1 553 437 B1
52
EP 1 553 437 B1
53
EP 1 553 437 B1
54
EP 1 553 437 B1
55
EP 1 553 437 B1
56
EP 1 553 437 B1
57
EP 1 553 437 B1
58
EP 1 553 437 B1
59
EP 1 553 437 B1
60
EP 1 553 437 B1
61
EP 1 553 437 B1
62
EP 1 553 437 B1
63
EP 1 553 437 B1
64
EP 1 553 437 B1
65
EP 1 553 437 B1
66
EP 1 553 437 B1
67
EP 1 553 437 B1
68
EP 1 553 437 B1
69
EP 1 553 437 B1
70
EP 1 553 437 B1
71
EP 1 553 437 B1
72
EP 1 553 437 B1
73
EP 1 553 437 B1
74