multas per gentes et multa per saecula
Paweł Valde-Nowak, Krzysztof Sobczyk
Marek Nowak, Jarosław Źrałka
(EDITORS)
multas per gentes et multa per saecula
JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY IN KRAKÓW
FACULTY OF HISTORY
INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY
ALTER
PUBLISHING HOUSE
amici magistro et collegae suo
ioanni christopho kozłowski dedicant
MULTAS PER GENTES ET MULTA PER SAECULA
MULTAS PER GENTES ET MULTA PER SAECULA
AMICI MAGISTRO ET COLLEGAE SUO
IOANNI CHRISTOPHO KOZŁOWSKI DEDICANT
Paweł Valde-Nowak, Krzysztof Sobczyk
Marek Nowak, Jarosław Źrałka
(editors)
KRAKÓW 2018
The edition and publication of this book was funded by the Faculty of History at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Reviewers: Peter Bogucki, Jiří Svoboda
Editors: Paweł Valde-Nowak, Krzysztof Sobczyk, Marek Nowak, Jarosław Źrałka
Technical editors: Anna Kraszewska, Michał Wasilewski
Assistant editors: Agnieszka Brzeska-Pasek, Magda Cieśla, Adriana Drabik, Robert Kenig, Julia Kościuk,
Paulina Kowalczyk-Matys, Tomasz Oberc, Krzysztof E. Rak, Jakub Skłucki, Anna Słupianek,
Magdalena Więckowska, Albert Wydrzycki, Justyna Zakrzeńska
Cover design: Michał Znamirowski
Photograph on the cover: Unfinished pendant made from a wolf (Canis lupus) third upper incisor
with notches (Kraków Spadzista C2) found by J.K. Kozłowski in 1980 (photo by Piotr Wojtal)
Photograph on the page 10: Prof. Janusz K. Kozłowski (photo by Anna Wojnar)
Proofreading: Steven Jones and authors
Translation of the Latin text on the cover: Tomasz Polański
Typesetting and layout: Elżbieta Fidler-Źrałka
Correction of figures: Urszula Bąk
Copyright © Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Copyright © Alter Publishing House and Authors
Kraków 2018, Edition I
ISBN 978-83-948382-3-2 (Institute of Archaeology, Jagiellonian University in Kraków)
ISBN 978-83-64449-68-0 (Alter Publishing House)
Institute of Archaeology
Jagiellonian University in Kraków
Gołębia 11 Street
31-007 Kraków
Poland
http://www.archeo.uj.edu.pl
E-mail: archeo.sekretariat@uj.edu.pl
Printed in Poland
Alter Radosław Palonka (Publisher)
Śliczna 30B/43 Street
31-444 Kraków
Poland
Phone: +48 606-781-823
http://www.wydawnictwoalter.pl
E-mail: alter@wyd-alter.pl
CONTENTS
11
It is my honour...
Paweł Valde-Nowak
13
Tabula gratulatoria
17
Everythingness
Stefan Karol Kozłowski
21
Janusz Kozłowski, la finesse et l’érudition
Marcel Otte
25
Keilmesser with tranchet blow from Grotte de la Verpillière I (Germolles, Saône-et-Loire, France)
Jens Axel Frick, Klaus Herkert, Christian Thomas Hoyer, Harald Floss
37
The mystery of the bifacial knife from Osełków in the Holy Cross Mountains, Poland
Małgorzata Kot, Michał Przeździecki
47
More scraper reduction sequences identified in Okiennik, Ciemna (Poland) and Samuilitsa II (Bulgaria)
Middle Palaeolithic assemblages
Tsoni Tsonev
55
Technology and typology of Szeletian leaf-shaped tools: Theoretical and methodological considerations
Zsolt Mester
63
The Early Upper Palaeolithic assemblage of arch-backed points from Kraków-Zwierzyniec site 1
Damian Stefański
71
The Uluzzian 50 years later
Annamaria Ronchitelli, Adriana Moroni, Paolo Boscato, Paolo Gambassini
77
The role of the Northern Adriatic region in the Protoaurignacian spread towards Mediterranean Europe
Alberto Broglio, Stefano Bertola, Fabio Negrino
85
European perspectives of the East European LGM Epi-Aurignacian with Sagaidak-Muralovka-type microliths
Yuri E. Demidenko, Petr Škrdla, Joseba Rios-Garaizar
93
The new Upper-Palaeolithic cave site in the Polish Jura (Ogrodzieniec-Podzamcze, shelter Birów IV)
Krzysztof Cyrek
109
The dead, the shaman – and the chief? Status and prestige during the Gravettian
Thorsten Uthmeier
115
Kraków Spadzista – A Gravettian site of mammoth hunters
Piotr Wojtal, Jarosław Wilczyński, Krzysztof Sobczyk
123
Upper Palaeolithic settlement in Iberia: 20 years of research in the Côa Valley (Portugal)
Thierry Aubry
131
Les constructions en os de mammouths de l’habitat Paleolithique de Gontsy (Ukraine): etude preliminaire
Lioudmila Iakovleva, François Djindjian
145
Early Magdalenian microliths from Mirande 1 (Nègrepelisse, Tarn-et-Garonne, France)
Gerhard Bosinski
157
A possible structure in the Lower Magdalenian horizon of El Mirón Cave (Cantabria, Spain)
Lawrence Guy Straus, Manuel R. González-Morales
167
An essay on the archaeostratigraphy of the Magdalenian and the Final Palaeolithic in Central Germany
Clemens Pasda
175
Late Magdalenian campsite in a rock shelter at the Obłazowa Rock
Paweł Valde-Nowak, Anna Kraszewska, Magda Cieśla, Adam Nadachowski
185
Versions mobilières et pariétales d’un motif géométrique non figuratif dans la grotte Gazel (Aude, France).
Implications chrono-culturelles
Dominique Sacchi
191
A note on the Upper Palaeolithic industrial sequence in the lower Louros river valley, district of Preveza,
Epirus, northwest Greece
Eugenia Adam
199
Working together on the origins of voyaging in the Eastern Mediterranean
Albert J. Ammerman, Jay S. Noller
205
Traces of presence of the Late Palaeolithic hunters in Toruń and its surroundings
Beata Bielińska-Majewska
213
Fire striker from Federmesser campsite Nowa Biała 1 (Poland)
Jakub Skłucki, Anna Kraszewska, Mateusz Biborski, Paweł Valde-Nowak
219
The oldest strike-a-lights in Poland. The preliminary results of microwear and chemical analysis
Grzegorz Osipowicz, Iwona Sobkowiak-Tabaka, Mariusz Bosiak
229
The microlithisation of chipped stones in the Old World: Case-studies from the Crimea and northern Italy
Paolo Biagi, Elisabetta Starnini
243
The Mesolithic raw stone materials in the Tyrol and the adjacent area
Albert Wydrzycki
249
Mapping the Mesolithic
Erwin Cziesla
257
At the edge of two worlds: Hunter-gatherers and early farmers in the Polish Lowlands
Jacek Kabaciński, Agnieszka Czekaj-Zastawny, Thomas Terberger
267
Mesolithic materials from sites 3 and 4 in Kraków-Kobierzyn
Justyna Zakrzeńska
277
The Neolithic stove and the artefacts inside it from Ayakagytma ‘The Site’, Kyzyl-kums, Central Asia
Karol Szymczak, Mukhiddin Khudzhanazarov
281
Bridging up Anatolia. Çatalhöyük and northwestern Anatolia in the Late Neolithic
Arkadiusz Marciniak
291
The architecture of Gilgal I revisited
Olivier Aurenche, Stefan Karol Kozłowski
295
A new hypothesis on the emergence of the Early Neolithic Cardial culture
Jean Guilaine
301
Bullet core pendants from South Marmara region
Ivan Gatsov, Petranka Nedelcheva
307
The Neolithic house in the Eastern Balkans
Vassil Nikolov
311
A retrospect on yellow spotted flint
Barbara Voytek
317
The woman, the pots, and the cattle figurine. New materiality of an early ALP burial from Polgár-Ferenci-hát
Pál Raczky, Alexandra Anders
329
A short report on the research of the earliest Alföld Linear Pottery culture in Hernád Valley,
North-eastern Hungary
Piroska Csengeri
337
The contribution of finds from feature no. 1/12 at Ražňany (distr. Sabinov, Slovakia) for the problem
of foreign influences in the area of the Bükk culture
Anton Karabinoš, Marek Nowak, Marián Vizdal, Adriána Voľanská
351
Colorants used to decorate the Bükk culture vessels
Agnieszka Czekaj-Zastawny, Anna Rauba-Bukowska, Rastislav Hreha
361
Preliminary data on the house structures of the LBK settlement at Apc-Berekalja (NE-Hungary)
László Domboróczki
369
The possible participation of autochthonous Mesolithic inhabitants in the Neolithisation of Upper Silesia
Vratislav Janák, Kateřina Papáková
375
Flint raw material economy among the earliest Danubian communities from the Sandomierz Upland area
(south-central Poland)
Marcin Szeliga
385
Šárka in Volhynia
Andrij B. Bardec’kyj, Maciej Dębiec, Thomas Saile
389
North-eastern periphery of Neolithic Europe
Stanisław Kukawka, Jolanta Małecka-Kukawka
401
Is length significant? LBK longhouses and the social context in central-eastern Europe
Lech Czerniak
411
The importance of obsidian distribution during the Neolithic in the Circum-Carpathian Area
Małgorzata Kaczanowska
419
A unique early Neolithic pendant of the Linear Pottery culture from site 10 at Kruszyn, Włocławek commune
Dominik Kacper Płaza, Piotr Papiernik, Wojciech Siciński
425
Nicolaevca V – preliminary information on the 2016 excavations of a Neolithic and Copper Age settlement
in Northern Moldova
Stanislav Țerna, Maciej Dębiec, Andreea Vornicu-Țerna, Mariana Vasilache-Curoșu, Thomas Saile
435
A note to the origins of the idea of rondels
Jaromír Kovárník
443
Analysis of the placement strategy of rondelsin the cultural landscape
Jaromír Kovárník, Štěpán Kravciv
451
Chipped stone inventories of the Malice culture from southern Poland
Jarosław Wilczyński
459
Research on the Neolithic flint workshop at the Bębło-Zachruście Site, Lesser Poland:
Description of cores in the Pleszów-Modlnica group of the Lengyel culture
Elżbieta Trela-Kieferling
475
The mainstream of Eneolithic flint-working of the Balkan-Danubian cultures
Anna Zakościelna
485
Can we talk about the Copper Age in Lesser Poland? Contribution to the discussion
Stanisław Wilk
495
Pre-Baden cultural horizon in the Eneolithic of western Lesser Poland
Albert Zastawny
503
The new features of the Baden culture from the Kraków-Cło site
Janusz Bober
511
The current state of research on the flint industry in the Pre-Baden and Classic Baden horizons
in western Lesser Poland
Agnieszka Brzeska-Pasek
521
'Defence construction' of the 4th/3rd millennium BC on the Vistula and Odra:
Inspirations from the Baden culture
Aleksander Kośko, Marzena Szmyt
531
Traces of the Bell Beakers’ contacts with the Funnel Beaker communities in Central Pomerania
Jacek Wierzbicki
537
The erratic stone raw material reservoir in the Polish Lowland and its procurement and selection
within the local late Neolithic societies. Choices between the ‘gift’ from the glacial past
and the Earth’s natural resources of the ‘south’
Piotr Chachlikowski
547
New perspectives on the Battle Axe culture of southern Sweden
Lars Larsson
555
Can the study of flint assemblages say something about the political relations in the early history of Egypt?
Michał Kobusiewicz
561
Tell el-Farkha as a trade centre between Egypt and the Levant in the 4th millennium BC
Krzysztof M. Ciałowicz
567
HLC Project. New polish archaeological activity in At-Tafileh micro-region (south Jordan)
Piotr Kołodziejczyk, Michał Wasilewski, Marcin Czarnowicz, Jacek Karmowski, Julia Kościuk,
Aleksandra Węgrzynek
577
On the beginnings of prehistory and on chipped flints in the Late Bronze Age
Jacek Lech, Dagmara H. Werra
585
Caves in the Post-medieval landscape of the Polish Jura Chain
Michał Wojenka
593
Palaeolithic and Neolithic wood charcoal remains as important tools for chronological, ethnographic
and environmental studies
Magdalena Moskal-del Hoyo, María Ntinou, Yolanda Carrión Marco, Paloma Vidal-Matutano, Ernestina Badal
601
Traces of supposed Neolithic plant husbandry in the multicultural site 3 at Miechów, southern Poland
Aldona Mueller-Bieniek, Magdalena Moskal-del Hoyo, Magda Kapcia, Marcin M. Przybyła
609
Vegetation history of the surrounding environment of Sarakenos Cave, Central Greece:
A palaeoecological perspective
Chrysanthi Ioakim, Adamantios Sampson, Antonia Tsourouni
621
From Clovis hunters to Pueblo farmers: The pre-Columbian period in the Mesa Verde region
of the North American Southwest
Radosław Palonka
635
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Jarosław Źrałka, Christophe Helmke, Bernard Hermes, Wiesław Koszkul
647
Landscape in flux: Geopolitics among Classic Maya societies in Petén, Guatemala.
An example from the Poza Maya Research Project
Magdalena H. Rusek-Karska
655
The “Bird Lot Style”: Its characteristics, and power garments in Chimu culture (Peru)
Victòria Solanilla Demestre
661
A garden in the desert: Lima agriculture and environment in Lomas de Lachay, Peru
Piotr Kalicki, Tomasz Kalicki, Piotr Kittel
669
Debating lithics from pre-colonial sites in Los Roques Archipelago, Venezuela (AD 1000-1500)
Andrzej T. Antczak, Ma. Magdalena Antczak, Arturo Jaimes
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Jarosław Źrałka, Christophe Helmke, Bernard Hermes, Wiesław Koszkul
Abstract: Recent research at the Maya site of Nakum, located in north-eastern Guatemala, and conducted by the
Jagiellonian University of Kraków has led to the discovery of various incised sherds dating to different periods of Maya
history and featuring diverse iconographic themes, from simple lines and geometric designs to more complex scenes
of mythological character. Here we present a brief outline of the most important incised sherds found by the Nakum
Archaeological Project and emphasising a large sherd that has been found in the core of talud-tablero platform and may
depict a set of patron deities. Ceramic graffiti constitute an understudied topic in the scientific discourse of Maya studies
and this is one of the first articles to be dedicated to this topic.
Keywords: pre-Columbian Maya, Guatemala, ceramic graffiti, incised sherds, talud-tablero
Introduction
Ceramic graffiti constitute a very interesting, though
completely understudied phenomenon in the field of
Maya and Mesoamerican studies. To date, only short
and sporadic mentions concerning incised sherds or
whole vessels have appeared in the scientific literature (e.g. Culbert 1993; Smith 1955, 1977). This contrasts a great deal with the Mediterranean cultures
of the Old Word, such as ancient Egypt and Greece,
where ostraca—secondarily decorated ceramic
sherds (and stone flakes), bearing predominantly
incised or painted texts—hold a distinctive place in
epigraphic studies and figure prominently in the literature (e.g. Forsdyke 2005; McDowell 2002; Lang
1974, 1976; Vanhove 2006). Although the comparable tradition of secondarily decorating ceramics in
Mesoamerica is widespread, it is dealt with only haphazardly—and this despite the fact that incised ceramics are found in large numbers at a variety of archaeological sites across Mesoamerica. The ancient
inhabitants of Mesoamerica must have re-used both
small and large ceramic fragments for many different
reasons, usually as pendants and expedient spindle
whorls, as well as net weights, but also for possible
ritual purposes, as the scenes that cover them imply.
One example from Calakmul, for instance, shows
a personified maize plant, the mature cob rendered
as none other than the head of the animate Maize
god, peering through the swaying leaves (Fig. 1). At
times, whole vessels are covered by very complex
narratives, involving several characters and evoking
historical or mythological scenes or activities of daily
life (see Fig. 2). We call these incisions graffiti (pl.) or
graffito (sing.) since they constitute secondary additions to the vessels and sherds, which were not part
of original decoration of such ceramics.
In this paper, we would like to describe some of the
recently discovered and secondarily incised sherds
from the Maya site of Nakum located in north-eastern
Guatemala as part of the research of the Nakum
Archaeological Project of the Jagiellonian University,
Kraków, Poland. Whereas these sherds are found in
a variety of contexts, one large fragment—covered
by a very complex and rare scene of mythological
character—has been found in the architectural core
of a talud-tablero platform dating to the Early Classic
period (c. AD 300-550). This ceramic artefact is the
focus of this paper. Nevertheless, as we will show,
the tradition of re-using and incising fragments of
broken vessels is a long one, spanning the entirety
of Maya history.
│ 635
Jarosław Źrałka et al.
The Maya site of Nakum
Fig. 1. Detail of a Balanza Black vessel from Calakmul bearing
an incised design representing a personified maize plant as
the Maize God (drawing by Ch. Helmke).
Nakum is a secondary Maya centre situated in the
area of Yaxha-Nakum-Naranjo National Park in the
north-eastern part of department of El Peten, in
Guatemala (Fig. 3). Following up on initial investigations conducted by the Proyecto Triángulo or
Proyecto Protección de Sitios Arqueológicos del Petén
[PROSIAPETEN], the Nakum Archaeological Project
has undertaken intensive research at the site since
2006, thanks to permission granted by the Guatemalan Institute of Anthropology and History (IDAEH)
and Ministry of Sports and Culture of Guatemala.
Nakum was discovered in 1905 by a French count
and explorer, Maurice de Périgny (Périgny 1911).
Subsequently, the site was investigated by several
American scholars such as Alfred Tozzer, Raymond
Merwin and Sylvanus Morley between the 1910s and
1930s (Tozzer 1913; Morley 1937-38). In the 1970s
it was visited twice, by Nicholas Hellmuth (1992),
who at the time was conducting investigations at
Yaxha, an important Maya city situated 11 km to the
south of Nakum (Fig. 3). In the 1980s the Guatemalan
Institute of Anthropology and History started a crucial
program of restoration and salvage works of the
most deteriorated monumental structures at Nakum.
These activities were followed by archaeological
excavations started in the 1990s which continued
until 2008 (Calderón et al. 2008; Hermes, Calderón
2003; Hermes et al. 1996; Noriega, Hermes 2000;
Quintana 2014; Quintana, Wurster 2002). In 2006,
a new program of investigations begun at the site,
under the auspices of the Jagiellonian University.
One of the most important aims of our project was to
study, in greater detail, the growth of Nakum during
Fig. 2. Polychrome vessel of unknown provenience (in private
collection) covered by a set of complex narrative scenes
incised to its surface (photo by J.L. Velásquez Muñoz, drawing
by J.L. Velásquez Izaguirre and K. Radnicka).
636 │
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Fig. 3. Map showing the location of the archaeological site of Nakum in relation to other nearby sites of the Triangle National Park
in north-eastern Guatemala (map by P. Kołodziejczyk).
the Early Classic, especially in light of Teotihuacan
contacts that appear throughout much of the central
Maya lowlands, possibly as part of Teotihuacan
incursions, known in the literature as entradas (e.g.
Braswell 2003; Nielsen 2003; Stuart 2000).
Incised sherds from Nakum:
An overview of the corpus
Among the incised sherds from Nakum we have
at least one early example dated to the Middle
Preclassic period (c. 700-300 BC). It has been
found in the construction core of a large pyramidal
temple: Structure 104 (or X) located in the Northern
Sector of Nakum (Fig. 4). In the course of our
investigations we excavated one tunnel at the
base of this construction (on its major E-W axis)
penetrating its core. The tunnel exposed a very
early substructure denominated Sub-1 dated to the
A’yim or Mamom phase at Nakum (c. 700-300 bc).
The fragment in question has been found in the core
of this early building. It is an orange ware sherd (of
Savana Orange type) that has been trimmed and cut
to a roughly circular shape, thereby forming a disk,
which was then only embellished by a series of two
roughly concentric incisions (Fig. 5:a).
Several incised ceramic fragments dating to the
subsequent period, the Late Preclassic (c. 300-100
bc/ad 1), are found in different archaeological contexts at Nakum. One of these incisions was added
to the centre of a flanged Sierra Red dish, excavated by the Triangle Project and found cached within
a chultun (No. 20). That graffito represents a stylized
│ 637
Jarosław Źrałka et al.
Fig. 4. Map of Nakum showing the various contexts where incised sherds have been found as well as Patio 1 where the taludtablero architecture has been discovered (map after Quintana, Wurster 2002 with corrections by DECORSIAP, IDAEH).
638 │
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Fig. 5. A selection of incised sherds from Nakum: a – ceramic disc of Savana Orange type, Middle Preclassic; b – fragment that
may feature a real or supernatural animal, Sierra Red, Late Preclassic; c – sherd with an unclear, albeit snout-like element; d –
stylized human skull incised into a Sierra Red flanged dish; e – sherd with graffito representing what may be a caricature of a
human head, Protoclassic or Early Classic; f, g – two incised sherds dated to the Protoclassic period (photo by R. Słaboński and
drawing by Ch. Helmke).
although elegantly rendered human cranium (Fig.
5:d). In addition to this vessel there are relatively
small sherds with simple (Fig. 5:c) or more complex
designs that are very difficult to interpret (Fig. 5:b).
One of these sherds that may represent an animal
(Fig. 5:b) has been found below a carved monument
(Stela 4) of Terminal Classic date in south-western
corner of the Northern Sector. This Late Preclassic
sherd of Sierra Group was discovered in a secondary context in a stratum that also contained ceramics of Late and Terminal Classic date. Another sherd
(Fig. 5:c) was found in the core of Patio 1 courtyard
(the core of Floor 5 in the south-eastern corner of the
patio) and it depicts an elongated, perhaps snoutlike element.
An interesting collection of incised sherds from
Nakum is associated with the Terminal Preclassic
or Protoclassic period (denominated Ajkok phase at
Nakum and dated between the first century bc and
the third century ad). In this group, we have one
interesting example of an incised ceramic graffito
that comes from a fragment of the base of a polychromatic basal flanged plate (PANFC 007; Fig. 6:a).
This fragment belongs to Batellos Black-on-red ceramic type (see Smith, Gifford 1966: 155). It was
found in the core of a large platform (Structure 99)
constructed during the Protoclassic period on top of
the Northern Group of Nakum – a large architectural
complex that forms the northernmost monumental
compound of the epicentre of Nakum (Fig. 4). The
artefact in question was recovered in the core of the
terrace (representing some remodelling effort to the
lowermost terrace of Structure 99). The interior of
the vessel features a conch shell, which in this case
may have aquatic connotations (Fig. 6:b).
Another ceramic sherd covered with incised graffito is a very small fragment of Protoclassic or Early
Classic date (see Fig. 5:e). This artefact has been dis│ 639
Jarosław Źrałka et al.
Fig. 7. Ceramic sherd incised with a depiction of an unidentified quadruped (photo by R. Słaboński).
Fig. 6. Ceramic fragment of Batellos Black-on-red covered by
incision depicting conch shell. Protoclassic period (photo by
R. Słaboński).
covered in the construction core of Structure 14 located in the Acropolis complex, to the south of Structure 15. Underlying the later mounded structure, are
several Protoclassic and Early Classic constructions,
which during the Late Classic period were covered
by a larger pyramidal structure. One of these early
substructures is the so-called Red Building and it is
in the core of the platform of this construction where
the above-described fragment was found. Its graffito
seems to represent a caricature of human face that
finds counterparts in the rich corpus of architectural
graffiti in the Maya area (see Źrałka 2014).
More examples of ceramic graffiti date to the
Classic period. Apart of one beautifully rendered
scene from the Early Classic vessel fragment found in
talud-tablero structure that will be described in the
following section, there is another incised ceramic
sherd dated to the same period (it bears No. PANFC
038 according to the numeration of large ceramic
fragments found by NAP). It is a large sherd that has
been trimmed to form a disc 10.4 x 9 cm that had
a small hole (its vestiges are seen on the edge of the
artefact). It is part of a black ware vessel (of Balanza
Black type) that was embellished with well-executed
and finely incised iconography (Fig. 7) which
represents a quadruped animal, with an elongated
snout and pointed ears, possibly a canid or a species
640 │
of Didelphis. Atop of its head is a small flame-shaped
element and from its mouth is a partial emission that
may qualify this as a supernatural entity that hovers
above a rectangular element that is subdivided by
rectilinear divisions and cross-hatching.
A Late Classic fragment covered by incised
graffiti has been found within the core of Structure
15 (the pyramidal platform delimiting the eastern
side of Patio 1). On the exterior of a polychromatic
vase of Zacatel Cream-polychrome type (see Smith,
Gifford 1966: 164; Gifford 1976: 251) we can see
a stylised human face, to which is added a highly
simple body and bent lines as flailing arms (Fig. 8).
This depiction is remarkable, not the least since the
face is a conventionalised depiction of a particular
hieroglyph that, whereas it does resemble a simple
human face, is used variously as a logogram for saak
‘seed’ and when it is used in calendrical notations
as ajaw ‘king’—the name of the twentieth day of the
ritual Tzolk’in calendar (see Thompson 1960:150151; Grube 1992; David Stuart pers. comm. 2010).
When this same sign is seen with curving volutes
above, it represents a germinating seed (known in the
technical literature as the “flaming ajaw”) functions
as a logogram, read mihin, which serves as the
basis for a metaphorical expression that describes
the relationship between a father and his son (see
Schele et al. 1977). Despite the use and function of
this hieroglyph, the individual who incised this sherd
clearly took its appearance as a depiction of a human
face and thereby added the schematic outline of the
body, to complete the appearance.
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Fig. 8. Late Classic, Zacatel Cream-polychrome sherd featuring
a stylized human face and body (photo by R. Słaboński).
An incised sherd from the talud-tablero
platform
A large ceramic fragment, which is the focus of this
paper, has been found in the construction core of a talud-tablero platform situated in the Southern Sector
of Nakum, in the so-called Acropolis complex (Fig. 4).
The Acropolis is a large architectural platform 170 m
(N-S) x 150 m (E-W) at its base that is surmounted
by more than forty structures arranged around 16
courtyards or patios (Quintana 2014: 176). The largest and the most important of them is Patio 1 measuring c. 40 × 40 m, and is contiguous with the primary entrance to the palatial complex at the north.
Previous Triangle Project research discovered
talud-tablero architecture at several points around
Patio 1 (Hermes et al. 2006). These constitute a significant find, since architecture exhibiting terraces
that are decorated with mouldings and reset panels
that conform to the features of talud-tablero are typical of the architecture of the great central metropolis, Teotihuacan (e.g. Cash 2005).
The discovery by the Triangle Project of taludtablero architecture along with green obsidian
artefacts that find their source in the obsidian mines
to the north of Teotihuacan, in the core of one of the
talud-tablero platforms indicate that Nakum was
under significant Teotihuacan contact, possibly via
networks connected to Tikal and/or Yaxha (Hermes
et al. 2006; Koszkul et al. 2006; Koszkul 2010).
During our recent research, carried out in the
framework of the Nakum Archaeological Project, we
wanted to further study the talud-tablero platforms
that previously had been only the subject of preliminary research. The investigations revealed that the
talud-tablero style platforms existed at the southern,
western, northern and north-eastern part of Patio 1
and joined together at their corners forming a sunken courtyard (Koszkul et al. 2006; Koszkul 2010).
Based on associated materials and architectural stratigraphy, the talud-tablero architecture at Nakum can
be dated to the Tzakol 3 phase.
Our investigations were especially focused on
the building, designated as Structure G Sub-2, a taludtablero structure measuring c. 1.8-2.0 m in height,
which defines the southern perimeter of Patio 1.
Structure G Sub-2 was determined to measure more
than 40 m long, and exhibited a 0.28-0.35 m high
talud, and tablero with lower and upper moulding.
In the course of our investigations, which included
tunnelling of the core of this building, we found a
very rich collection of artefacts made of ceramics,
obsidian, chert and other materials, including Thin
Orange ceramics and green obsidian artefacts from
Teotihuacan. Among this material, there were
several incised sherds of which one merits particular
attention here.
The incised sherd (PANFC 030) found in the core
of Structure G Sub-2 measures 23 x 17 cm and has
been identified as belonging to the Aguila Orange
type (see Smith, Gifford 1966: 154; Gifford 1979:
182) dated to Tzakol 3 phase. It bears orange slip
and its form indicates that it was most probably
part of a large globular jar, presumably intended to
contain fluids, such as water or beverages (Fig. 9:a).
The exterior part of the artefact was secondarily incised with a very interesting and complex scene (Fig.
9:b). The scene may be framed by a built edifice as
is suggested by the two, superimposed, rectangular
forms at the base, presumably representing an architectural platform, embellished by some banded bulbous elements. In addition, the left part of the scene
is delineated by what may be a wall, which is only
partly preserved at the right. What may be within
this structure are three triangular forms that point
│ 641
Jarosław Źrałka et al.
Fig. 9. a – photograph of a large ceramic sherd found in the core of the talud-tablero structure and covered by incised scene
(photo by R. Słaboński); b – scene incised on the surface of the same ceramic fragment (drawing by Ch. Helmke).
upwards, set side-by-side. Based on what remains
of these three forms we may conclude that these
were identical, or nearly so. Based on the shape of
these forms and the expressionless faces that topped
these, we might conclude that these represent funerary bundles, or bundled effigies at the very least.
Alternatively, these shapes may represent stylised
mountains or trees that may be personified, hence
642 │
the addition of faces. At the base of each of these
bundles or mounded features, we see human heads
in profile, peering to the left, and streaming from
their heads are what may be vegetal elements that
terminate in crescent-forms that are embellished by
small dashes. These distinctive profiles, the plantlike elements and the representation of heads in
isolation of bodies suggest that we may be looking
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
at the head of the decapitated Maize god, who in
a well-known mythological episode is decapitated at
the hands of underworld deities (see Taube 1992).
As a whole, the scene may thereby be a grouping of
three deity effigies contained within a ritual structure, such as the sacred precinct of a temple. Based
on this interpretation we can go on the speculate
that these represent three local deities, since patron
deities of particular sites preferentially occur in sets
of three. This is known from the hieroglyphic texts
at Tikal, Caracol and most notably at Palenque (see
Stuart 2005)—although more exceptional examples
are known from sites in the Petexbatun area, where
patron deities occur in pairs and at Copan the patron
deities (referred to as ‘guardians’) are quadripartite
(Stuart et al. 1999: 57-59).
Synthesis and concluding ideas
This paper constitutes an initial attempt to present
and analyse the incised ceramics from Nakum
showing the importance of this category of artefacts.
It seems that many broken vessel fragments had
a “second life” or episodes of use upon receiving
incised elements and/or decorations. They served
as a kind of media that conveyed special themes,
sometimes of a very complex mythological character.
As we have shown here not only small ceramic sherds
could be reused, receiving incised graffiti but there
were also whole vessels that were covered by complex
scenes as the finds from Nakum and other sites may
indicate. We call the incised motifs described in this
paper as graffiti since there is a distinction between
vessels which originally received incisions as part of
their original external decoration (added at the stage
of manufacture of such pieces and constituting their
original ornamentation) and ceramic fragments or
whole vessels to which incisions were added after
these vessels were created. As such, much of the
distinction rests with the identity of the creator of
such incisions. Was it ceramicist and potter, or the
user and owner of the ceramics? The latter designs
and representations can be called graffiti since they
constitute post-firing, secondary additions to the
whole vessels or to ceramic fragments that come
from fractured vessels.
Based on present evidence, the tradition of reusing and incising ceramic sherds is as old as the
appearance of ceramics in the Maya Lowlands. The
earliest examples from Nakum can be dated to the
Middle Preclassic period and are represented by
rather simple incisions. More sophisticated and very
numerous are examples dating to the transition between the Preclassic and Classic periods (the Protoclassic), leading on into the Early Classic. The Protoclassic as well as the subsequent, Early Classic, period are represented by the most beautiful and complex examples of incised graffiti from Nakum. A large
ceramic fragment discovered in the core of Structure
G Sub-2 merits special attention as it may represent
the heads of mythological figures and the bundled
effigies of patron deities. Another artefact from the
same period – a ceramic disc of Balanza Black type
– features a beautifully rendered quadruped shown
in a very dynamic position. Together, as a set, these
sherds demonstrate that the practice of decorating
ceramics, during the latter phase of their usage, as
well as the very act of decorating isolated sherds
with designs, was well-established and prevalent
during the Protoclassic through to the Early Classic.
This is a feature that is widespread during the same
time period, both at other sites in the Maya lowlands
(e.g. Río Azul, see Adams 1999) as well as at Teotihuacan in the central Mexican highlands (e.g. Spence
2015). This tradition clearly continues during the
following Late Classic, traditionally considered to be
the apogee of Classic Maya civilization.
The archaeological context of the discovery of
incised sherds also warrants continued attention
since most of them come from the core of important
public buildings (Structures 14, 15 and 104). Two
of these, Structures 15 and 104, functioned as
funerary pyramids and places for the veneration of
ancestors as our investigations indicate (see Źrałka
et al. 2011, 2017). Besides, Structure 104 was part
on an E-Group which also constituted an important
ceremonial complex associated with observation of
the sun, the commemoration of important period
endings, and related rituals (Aimers, Rice 2006; Aveni
et al. 2003; Aylesworth 2004, 2015). At least some
of these sherds might have been deposited into the
core of buildings in a ceremonial act that might have
involved the ritual placement, breaking or ‘killing’
of larger fragments or whole vessels. In the course
of our investigations we found many fragments of
polychrome vessels that were intentionally scattered
into various parts of the core of excavated buildings
during the process of construction (especially in
the case of Structures 14 and 104). Sometimes the
distance separating fragments stemming from one
and the same vessel is very large and only detailed
and large scale excavations can bring to light most
parts of such ritually deposited vessels.
The iconography, and in some cases quality of
style of ceramic graffiti, indicate that these must have
│ 643
Jarosław Źrałka et al.
been made by people familiar with canons of formal
regal art and/or had knowledge about ancient Maya
writing and mythology. It is therefore tempting to
think that many, if not most, of the more complex and
achieved scenes were created by artists and scribes
attached to the royal court. Yet, given the diversity
of the collection of incised ceramics we can see that
these constitute a wide kaleidoscope of motifs with
varying degrees of refinement, accomplishment and
symbolic weight.
Acknowledgements
The analysis of a large corpus of Nakum ceramics
as well as the preparation of this article were made
possible thanks to the funding provided by the
National Science Centre, Poland under the agreement no. UMO-2014/14/E/HS3/00534 (Sonata Bis
Programme).
We would like to thank Juan Luis Velásquez for his
premission to publish here photograph and drawing
of an unprovenanced vessel shown in Figure 2.
References
Adams, R. 1999. Río Azul: An Ancient Maya City, Norman.
Aimers, J., Rice P. 2006. Astronomy, Ritual, and the Interpretation of Maya “E-Group” Architectural Assemblages, Ancient Mesoamerica 17: 79-96.
Aveni, A., Dowd A., and Vining B. 2003. Maya calendar
reform? Evidence from orientations of specialized
architectural assemblages, Latin American Antiquity
14 (2): 159-178.
Aylesworth, G. 2004. Astronomical Interpretations of
Ancient Maya E-Group Architectural Complexes,
Archaeoastronomy 18: 34-66.
Aylesworth, G. 2015. E-Group Arrangements, (in:) C.L.N.
Ruggles (ed.), Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and
Ethnoastronomy, New York and London: 783-792.
Braswell, G. (ed.) 2003. The Maya and Teotihuacan:
Reinterpreting Early Classic Maya Interaction, Austin.
Calderón, Z., Hermes, B., González, B., and Tobar T. 2008.
La Acrópolis Interior de Nakum, (in:) J.P. Laporte,
B. Arroyo, and H. Mejía (eds), XXI Simposio de
Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2007,
Guatemala City: 487-500.
Cash, C. 2005. Locating the Place and Meaning of the TaludTablero Architectural Style in the Early Classic Maya
Built Environment, Unpublished PhD thesis, University
of Texas at Austin, Austin.
644 │
Culbert, T.P. 1993. The Ceramics of Tikal: Vessels from the
Burials, Caches, and Problematical Deposits, Tikal
Report 25, Part A, Philadelphia.
Forsdyke, S. 2005. Exile, Ostracism, and Democracy: The
Politics of Expulsion in Ancient Greece, Princeton.
Gifford, J. 1976. Prehistoric Pottery Analysis and the
Ceramics of Barton Ramie, in the Belize Valley, Peabody
Museum Memoirs 18, Cambridge.
Grube, N. 1992. Is the T533 “AHAU” face a logograph for nik,
flower?, (in:) L. Schele (ed.), Notebook for the XVIth
Maya Hieroglyphic Workshop at Texas, University of
Texas, Austin.
Hellmuth, N.M. 1992. A Report to IDAEH on four days
research at Nakum, Foundation for Latin American
Anthropological Research, Guatemala City.
Hermes, B., and Calderón Z. 2003. La secuencia de ocupación prehispánica en Nakum: Una visión preliminar,
(in:) J. P. Laporte et al. (eds), XVI Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2002, Guatemala
City: 305-319.
Hermes, B., Calderón, Z., Pinto, E., and Ugarte R. 1996. Investigación arqueológica en Nakum, Yaxha y Topoxte,
región noreste de Petén, (in:) J.P. Laporte and H. Escobedo (eds), IX Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueologicas en Guatemala 1995, Guatemala City: 3-24.
Hermes, B., Koszkul, W., and Calderón Z. 2006. Los Mayas y la cultura teotihuacana: Descubrimientos de
Nakum, Petén, (in:) J. P. Laporte, B. Arroyo, H. Escobedo, and H. Mejía (eds), XIX Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, Guatemala City:
895-910.
Koszkul, W. 2010. Teotihuacan Influence in Northeastern
Peten in the Early Classic Period, (in:) L. Broekhoven,
Rivera, R.V., Vis, B., and Sachse, F. (eds), The Maya
and their Neighbours: Internal and External Contacts
Through Time, Acta Mesoamericana 22: 61-72.
Koszkul, W., B. Hermes, and Z. Calderón. 2006. Teotihuacanrelated Finds from the Maya site of Nakum, Peten,
Guatemala, Mexicon 28: 117-127.
Lang, M. 1974. Graffiti in the Athenian Agora, Excavations
of the Athenian Agora. Picture book 14, Princeton.
Lang, M. 1976. Graffiti and dipinti, The Athenian Agora:
Results of excavations conducted by the American
School of Classical Studies at Athens 21, Princeton.
McDowell, A. G. 2002. Village Life in Ancient Egypt: Laundry
Lists and Love Songs, Oxford.
Morley, S. 1937-1938. The Inscriptions of Peten, Vol. 1-5,
Washington D.C.
Nielsen, J. 2003. Art of the Empire: Teotihuacan Iconography
and Style in Early Classic Maya Society (A.D. 380-500),
Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen,
Copenhagen.
Incised ceramics from Nakum, Guatemala
Noriega, R., Hermes B. 2000. Avance en los trabajos de
investigación arqueológica y restauración en los
Edificios N, 60 y 61 de Nakum, (in:) J.P. Laporte, H.
Escobedo, B. Arroyo and A.C. de Suasnávar (eds.),
XIII Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en
Guatemala, 1999, Guatemala City: 419-438.
Périgny, M. de. 1911. Les Ruines de Nakcun, Journal de la
Société des Américanistes de Paris 8: 5-22.
Quintana, O. 2014. Nakum – Ciudad Maya, Petén, Guatemala, Zeitschrift für Archäologie Außereuropäischer Kulturen 6: 145-246.
Quintana, O., Wurster W. 2002. Un nuevo plano del sitio
Maya de Nakum, Peten, Guatemala, Beiträge Zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archäologie 22: 243-275.
Schele, L., Mathews P., and Lounsbury F.G. 1977. Parentage
Expressions in Classic Maya Inscriptions, paper presented at the International Conference on Maya Iconography and Hieroglyphic Writing, Guatemala City.
Smith, L. 1977. Patolli at the ruins of Seibal, Peten, Guatemala, (in:) N. Hammond (ed.), Social Patterns in Maya
Prehistory, London, New York, San Francisco: 349-363.
Smith, R., Gifford J.C. 1966. Maya Ceramic Varieties, Types
and Wares at Uaxactun: A Supplement to “Ceramic
Sequence at Uaxactun, Guatemala”, Publication 28,
Tulane University, New Orleans.
Spence, M.W. 2015. Personal Art in Teotihuacan: The Thin
Orange Graffiti, Ancient Mesoamerica 26 (2): 295-311.
Stuart, D. 2005. The Inscriptions from Temple XIX at
Palenque: A Commentary, San Francisco.
Stuart, D., Houston, S., and Robertson J. 1999. Recovering
the Past: Classic Mayan Language and Classic Maya
Gods, (in:) Notebook for the XXIIIrd Maya Hieroglyphic
Forum at Texas, Department of Art and Art History,
University of Texas at Austin, Austin: II.1-II.96.
Taube, K. 1992. Aztec and Maya Myths, London.
Thompson, J.E.S. 1960. Catalog of Maya Hieroglyphs,
Norman.
Tozzer, A. 1913. A Preliminary Study of the Prehistoric
Ruins of Nakum, Guatemala, Memoirs of the Peabody
Museum of Archaeology & Ethnology, Harvard
University, 5(3), Cambridge.
Vanhove, D. 2006. Thorikos: Graffiti, Dipinti, Stamps,
Fouilles De Thorikos 3, Paris and Leuven.
Źrałka. J. 2014. Pre-Columbian Maya Graffiti: Context,
Dating and Function, Kraków.
Źrałka, J., Koszkul, W., Martin, S., and Hermes B. 2011. In
the Path of the Maize God: a Royal Tomb at Nakum,
Petén, Guatemala, Antiquity 85: 890-908.
Źrałka, J., Koszkul, W., Hermes, B., Velásquez, J.L., Matute
V., and Pilarski B. 2017. From E-Group to Funerary
Pyramid: Mortuary Cults and Ancestor veneration
in the Maya Centre of Nakum, Peten, Guatemala,
Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27 (3): 451-478.
Jarosław Źrałka
Institute of Archaeology,
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
j.zralka@uj.edu.pl
Christophe Helmke
Institute of Cross-cultural and Regional Studies,
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
cgbh@hum.ku.dk
Bernard Hermes
The Nakum Archaeological Project, Guatemala
bernardhermes26@gmail.com
Wiesław Koszkul
Institute of Archaeology,
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
wkoszkul@wp.pl
│ 645