Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Evaluating of a Teaching Intervention Cont ributing to
Airline Agents and Customers’ Communication in
Famagusta-Cyprus
Momen Yaseen M.Amin
University of Human Development, Iraq
Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Cyprus
Saeid Saadatmanesh
Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, Cyprus
Abstract
The purpose of the present monograph is to design a curriculum for those who buy airplane
tickets (customers) and those who sell them (airline agents) in different airline agencies in the
city of Famagusta in northern Cyprus. In other words, this study intends to contribute to their
interactions which are in English. The study follows the Nation and Macalister (2010)
“language curriculum design” as the framework and, in order to make it more comprehensive,
tries to follow the steps of the curriculum design introducing by them in detail. In this regard, the
researcher takes environmental analysis, needs analysis, principle (used to design the
curriculum), goals, content and sequencing, format and presentation, monitoring, assessment,
evaluation, approaches to curriculum design, are into consideration. Finally, a sample
unit/module with the teaching materials, exercises, etc., reflecting what the researhcre has
planned is provided.Because the outcomes in different context is different, it is impossible for this
design to be backward. Therfore the researcher, in this project, starts from goals and analyze the
needs (of the customers and the agents), and finally will design the curriculum accordingly. In
addition, the course design follows the Brumfit’s (1985) “syllabus with holes in it” because 10
minute of each session is determined for more practice and fluency in the skill.
Keywords: curriculum development; customer; airline agent.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 146
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Section one
1.
Context
The research aims to design a course for the airline agents and the customers who buy tickets
from those agents in the city of “Famagusta” in Northern Cyprus. The reason why the researcher
has chosen this city is because the best university in Cyprus (according to the world rankings) is
located in this city and many students from about 80 different countries travel to northern Cyprus
to study in Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU) in the city of Famagusta. Therefore there is
always a large amount of people traveling from Famagusta to many countries and coming back
from many countries to Famagusta. Thus most of the travellers are the students who study in the
city of Famagusta and the airline agencies deal with a lot of students from different L1 (first
languages). The second groups of travellers are tourists. Famagusta city, also, has a very clean
air and beautiful beach and a lot of tourists visit this city per year for holiday. Famagusta is a city
on the east coast of Cyprus. It is the capital of the Gazimağusa District of Northern Cyprus. It is
located east of Nicosia, and possesses the deepest harbour of the island. More detail about
context is mentioned in “setting” part.
2.
Environmental analysis
2.1 Environmental constraints
In this project, in order to find out the environmental constraints, the researcher has divided the
participants into customers and agents (learners), teachers, and situation.
2.2 Customers and agents
Age
To design a course for the travellers (tourists and students), different features of the customers
and agents (learners) have been taken into consideration. In this regard, firstly, the features of the
learners are so important and necessary. However, usually it is the students and parents who buy
and reserve the tickets, therefore both the agents and customers are adults. Consequently, the
activities, tasks, and topics in the classroom will be organized in a way that is suitable for adults.
Participants’ knowledge
The next step is to find out what the learners know. This could also help the teachers organize
the activities in the classroom (ex. whether to use teacher-centered or student-centered activities,
whether to translate to the first language or not) in a more efficient way. In this study, learners
are so heterogeneous, but according to the goals of the curriculum, the curriculum will benefit all
of them in a way that those with low proficiency levels will learn from the syllabus and those
with high proficiency level will organize their knowledge.
Specific purpose
The course design in this project is already English for specific purposes, therefore it cannot be
considered as constraint in the project. However the purpose of the customers and the sellers are
different and this issue has been taken into consideration.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 147
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Different ways of learning
Regarding the issue that different learners learn English in different ways, the researcher has
used highly motivating activities and the way the course designed is in a way that if some
learners preferred not to attend the class regularly, they would benefit from the course and
achieve the objectives of the course. Different ways of learning is different from different
learning styles which will be discussed later.
2.1.2 Teachers
Throughout the course design, the researcher has also provided some activities for the teachers to
overcome learners’ constraints. In addition, some other materials have been introduced to the
teachers to make them feel confident in their use of English. Finally, in order to make sure that
the teaches have enough time to prepare themselves before entering to the class, the homework
activities with the answer keys are given to them.
2.1.3 The situation
The classroom should not be so big that the students be far from each other and have difficulty
hearing each other and it should not be so small that hinder group work activities. When the
teacher has group work task, he/she should change the chairs and arrange it in a way that is
similar to the airline agencies.
In order for the teachers and the learners not to run out of time, the goals are staged with
time limitations. The learners have a certain amount of time to perform a set of tasks. For
example, the first task for a customer is to greet with the agent when he or she enters the office.
Some of the learners buy their tickets from the same agency several times, therefore the format
of greeting will be different after the first visit. The agents themselves, in order to feel happy to
see the customers again, should be able to greet in different ways after the first visit.
Resources
The researcher, while designing the course for airline agents and customers in Famagusta, has
provided individualized material. That is, customers and agents with different characteristics and
learning styles would benefit the course the most. Generally, the resources include the course file
designed by the researcher, listening tasks (conversation and short videos), reading and writing.
Significance of this design
It is worthy to design a course for travel agencies and the customers who buy the tickets from
them in Famagusta. The reason is that a lot of students come to this city to study in EMU
university and many tourists also travel to this city to visit its’ beautiful beach, therefore they
communicate with the agencies in this city to book their tickets.
2.2 Wider aspects of the situation
The following wider aspects of the situation (Dubin&Olshtain, 1986) have been taken into
considerations:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 148
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
1)
The language setting
2)
Patterns of language use in society
3)
Group and individual attitudes
The course has been designed in 2015 and the learners (with different levels), during one
semester, are supposed to attend 16 sessions including 90 minutes for each. Three airline
agencies in Famagusta are chosen for this course design. Two of most important and well known
agencies are located in front of the university gate. The third one that is selected for this project
is beside the petrol station before the white mosque.
Regarding the pattern of language use in Famagusta, this city is a place with an
increasing population because of commerce, tourism and migration in addition to its existing
multi-communal structure (Backhaus, 2007).
According to the group and individual attitudes of the learners which was interviewed by
the researchers, learning English for the purpose of reserving, buying, and selling airplane tickets
is highly prominent in the context of Famagusta.
2.3 Constraint of time
The researcher, in this project, has determined a specific period of time for the course semester to
achieve the required goals. In this regard, the amount of class time available is 1440 hours and in
order to achieve the goals of the course, one should devote half of this time on learning out of the
class to review the covered lessons at least once. Finally, according the time proposed time, the
customers are supposed to be able to communicate (greet, reserve ticket face to face or on phone,
reserve the tours, and discuss about the conditions of the flight).
Environmental constraints, in this project, are approached through two ways (Nation &
Macalister, 2010): the researcher, in some cases, has limited the goals of the course to fit the
available time. Accordingly, he has worked within the constraint and picked the most frequent
and necessary language items. However, in some other cases, the researcher has overcome the
constraints and has provided more self-study options for work to be done outside of class time.
3.
Needs analysis
3.1 Different focuses
Two types of needs analysis, namely target needs and learning needs (Huchinson& Waters,
1987)are introduced at the beginning and more detail about needs analysis are discussed in the
following sentences.
Regarding the target needs (what the learners need to do in the target situation), th e
customers are supposed to be able to easily communicate (reserving tickets and tours) to the
airline agencies. Accordingly, the researcher has looked at the necessities, needs, and wants. The
results are as following:
a)
The students are not supposed to do any writing tasks (because it is not necessary).
b)
The customers usually are not able to maintain the conversations with the airline agents
and sometimes they have difficulty in comprehending them, because some words are new for
them (lacks).
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 149
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
c)
The customers themselves wish to be able to discuss with the agents and ask for more
detailed information about the flights (wants).
Regarding the learning needs (what the learners need to do in order to learn), different
tasks of listening comprehension (listening to different customer agent conversation) and
speaking are determined for the learners. In addition, the way to perform those tasks is
determined as well. There is no reading comprehension for the learners, but they get familiar
with different ticket samples and tour brochures.
3.2 Investigating needs
The researcher, in order to find out the needs, has used a structured set of questions and
interview. However, because of some serious limitations, needs analysis has done mostly
through interview. Accordingly, one agent, 12 tourists, and 20 students were given a self-report
questionnaire and the researcher had a thirty minutes interview with each agents and the
customers. The needs of the customers are are as following:
a)
Meeting the agents
b)
Greeting for the first and second and more than second times
c)
Ask for the prices
d)
Ask for different times
e)
Ask for types of flights
f)
Bargaining
g)
Discuss about the luggage weigh limitations
h)
Discuss about the services
i)
Discuss about different facilities of the tours
The needs of the agents are as following:
a)
Meeting and welcome those customers that are going to buy ticket from them for the first
time
b)
Greeting the customers who come after first time
c)
Explaining the prices
d)
Explaining different times
e)
Explaining different types of flights
f)
Explaining the luggage weigh limitations
g)
Explaining the services that they will receive during the flight and after they arrived to
the destination
h)
Explain the facilities of the tours
3.3 The evaluation of needs
3.1 Needs identified
Three distinct needs were identified in the course design:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 150
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
language use on
the job
Needs
language to greet
and welcome
3.2 Reliability, validity, and practicality of the needs analysis
The researher makes sure of the reliability of the needs analysing by using standardised tools that
are applied systematically. Forexample, rather than just observing people, the researcher has
systematised the observation by using a checklist and interview.
The needs analysis of the design is highly valid because the researcher, in order to gather
the data, has visited the agents and interviewed them in real world. In adidtion, in order to
increase the validity of the design, the researcherasked the agents about the customers’ needs and
the results were compared with those of the customers’ answers. Finally, through a checklist, it
was asked from 3 other agents, 36 other students, and 22 other tourists from Kasakhstan and
Russia who came for summer school whether those needs are realistic or not.
The researcher did his best to analyse the learners needs in a realistic and practical way.
Acordingly, while interviewing and giving the checklists, he tried not to occupy too much of the
learners’ and teachers’ time. In adition, the results of the analysis is easy to underestand and
clear.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 151
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
4. Content
4.1 Special discourse
The main needs in this regard are oral styles that are fulfilled through different online videos that
are designed in the syllabus. The content (frequent vocabulary and syntax), which will be
discussed later, is designed accordingly.
4.2 Frequent items
The content of the course is designed according tothe Nation and Macalister (2010) course
evaluation. Accordingly, the most frequent words and structures in the airline agencies are
accumulated in the course design. To make this happen, the researcherhas observed and recorded
several conversations in the airline agencies (online and face to face) and finally compared them
to the frequent words of travelling in English vocabulary in usebook (elementary, pre
intermediate, upper intermediate, and advanced). Some of the words that were not used in the
real conversation of the agents and the customers were removed in the course design.
4.3 Strategies
Two learning strategies are sugested in the design. They are “peer interaction strategies” and
“coping strategy”. Peer interaction strategies helped the learners to memorize the common words
and retrieve them easier, and coping stratgy (inferring vocabulary from context) helped the
learners overcome the situations in which they come across new vocabularies. Accordingly, the
students are supposed to make a conversation in a pair work form and repeat it every session.
Also, in the tasks, the students sometimes use the words from the book English vocabulary in use
that was not mentioned in the main result and the interlocutors are supposed to guess the
meaning of those words from the context.
4.4 Repetition
The main language item in this design is vocabulary and structure. Therefore the learners need to
repeat the new vocabularies and structures in different tasks and every session. To achieve this,
each session, the previous vocabularies and structures are included in the lesson plan. That is, the
learners repeat the vocabularies and structures taught in the first session for 16 times. The most
frequent items are included in very beginning sessions.
4.5 Specified features of language
Those language structures that are regular and generalizable are chosen as the content of the
syllabus. For example, in order to be able to greet in different ways, the learners are supposed to
learn some formulaic structures and phrases, and substitute the words in them.
4.6 Sequence
The structure is sequenced according to the psychological complexity of that structure
(Pienemann et al., 1988). The psychological complexity of a structure depends on the amount of
rearranging that is needed when the message that the speaker wants to communicate is expressed
in language. The teachability hypothesis says that teaching cannot change the sequence in which
the structures are learners. The sequence if the structure in the course design is as following:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 152
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
a) Single word and formulae (in greeting mostly, ex. Hello, Hi again, Good afternoon, May
I have a sit?)
b) SVO (+ adverb preposing)
c) Topicalization (ex. tes I want this)
d) Negative
e) Wh. Question
f) Active and passive
5 Format and presentation
5.1 Four strands of the language
The available time for the learners that is determined in the course design, as mentioned
previously, is 1440 hours.In a session, that is 90 minutes, the teacher is supposed to divide the
the class time to four parts, namely, meaningful input, focus on language, meaningful output, and
fluency (such as repetition activities). Accordingly, 20 minutes is considered for each strand and
10 minutes left is used for more repetition.
5.2 Motivation
The teachers are supposed to behave and teach in a calm and appropriate way. In order to do so,
a pleasant and supportive atmosphere in the classroom is needed. In this regard, the students
should feel that the teachers are there for them and he/she is available to answer all of their
questions passionately. Furthermore, the teachers should make the classroom a unified and
cohesive classroom.
5.3 Differences in learning styles
The learners, in this course design, approach activities in a variety of ways. For example, the
teacher should work with the learners both individually and in group work; the teacher should
teach fast and slow (not always fast and not always slow); the teacher should not present the
lesson orally, sometimes he/she needs to write some notes on the board; the teachers should
consider that some learners learn practically and some others through understanding, the teacher
should not control the class all the time there sometimes should be a negotiated process.
6 Monitoring
The researcher incorporated the Ellis’ taxonomy of corrective feedback while designing this
course. Any time that the learners perform a task in the classroom, the teacher should
continuously provide written and oral feedback. The teacher is supposed to provide different
corrective feedbacks. In order for the class not to be boring, the teachers should always use
different varieties of feedbacks. The following typology of the corrective feedback is proposed
by Ellis (2009) that is an effective source for the teachers to be familiar with those feedbacks.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 153
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
6.5 Implicit feedback
6.2.1 Recast
The corrector incorporates the content words of the immediately preceding incorrect utterance
and changes and corrects the utterance in some way (e.g., phonological, syntactic, morphological
or lexical). For example:
L: I went there two times.
T: You’ve been. You’ve
been there twice as a
group?
6.1.2 Repetition
The corrector repeats the learner utterance highlighting the error by means of emphatic stress.
For example:
L: I will checked the flight for you.
T: I will checked the flight for you.
L: I’ll check the flight for you.
6.1.3 Clarification request
The corrector indicates that he/she has not understood what the learner said. For example:
L: I am reserve a ticket.
T: What?
6.6 Explicit feedback
6.6.1 Explicit correction
The corrector indicates an error has been committed, identifies the error and provides the
correction. For example:
L: On May.
T: Not on May, In May.
We say, “It will start in
May.”
6.6.2 Elicitation
The corrector repeats part of the learner utterance but not the erroneous part and uses rising
intonation to signal the learner should complete it. For example:
L: I’ll come if it will not
rain.
T: I’ll come if it ……?
6.2.3 Paralinguistic signal
The corrector uses a gesture or facial expression to indicate that the learner has made an error.
For example:
L: Yesterday I go cinema.
T: (gestures with right
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 154
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
forefinger over left
shoulder to indicate past)
In addition to the corrective feedback provided to monitor the learners’ performance, when
focusing meaning-based output, the teacher should be careful that each learner has the
opportunity to produce language.
7 Assessment
Proficiency test is not suggested in this design. The reason is that those with lower proficiency
will learn from this syllabus design and those with high proficiency will organize their
knowledge. The teacher is required to give quiz after four sessions to be able to reflect on the
progress of the learners.
8 Goals and sequencing content
The main goal of the course is to provide the learners the necessary resources to perform well in
airline agencies and reserve their favorite flights or tours. Therefore function is the unit of
progress in the course design. The goals of the course are simply displayed in the following
figure:
Greetin
g
express
what
you
want
ask
questio
ns
compre
hension
answer
ask for
detail
getting
things
done
The content of the course is sequenced according to Bruner’s (1962) spiral curriculum.
Accordingly, the major items of the course are covered several times during the semester.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 155
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
9 Evaluation
I order to make sure of the effectiveness of the course, it is evaluated through different
perspectives (Nation &Macaliste, 2010).
a) The researcher has gathered the data in the city of Famagusta and therefore the course
exactly suit the environment in which it will be used.
b) The content of the course is designed according to the needs of the students, therefore the
course meets the needs of the learners.
c) The movement in format and presentation has been from practice to theory (goals to
principle, therefore the course apply sensible principles of teaching and learning.
d) The content of the course is beneficial for both high and low proficient learners. High
proficient learners can organize their previous knowledge and low proficient students can
learn from the course.
e) Different learning styles of the learners have been taken into consideration, therefore it
attracts a lot of them.
f) The course covers four strands of language, therefore it leads to a lot of learning.
g)
9.1 Steps in evaluation
There are some steps that the research has considered while evaluation of the course design:
a) who the evaluation is for (those who benefit from it)
b) the usage of results (help the customer and agents communicate meaningfully and benefit
from the conversations happening between them)
c) available time and money (better communication would lead to more customers and more
discounts)
9.2Summative evaluation
The type of evaluation of the course design is summative. That is, the researcher has made a
summary or judgement on the quality or adequacy of the course.
10 Principles
Audio lingual method and communicative language learning are two main method that the
teachers are supposed to use.
10.5 Audio lingual method
The audio-lingual method is a style of teaching used in teaching foreign languages. It is based
on behaviorist theory(Fries, 1945) which professes that certain traits of living things, and in this
case humans, could be trained through a system of reinforcement and repetition. Charles C.
Fries, the director of the English Language Institute at the University of Michigan, the first of its
kind in the United States, believed that learning structure, or grammar was the starting point for
the student. In other words, it was the students' job to orally recite the basic sentence patterns and
grammatical structures.
The learners, in this course design, are supposed to repeat the words and the structures at
the very beginning sessions of the semester. They substitute the words of the sentences and
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 156
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
repeat them again and again and finally receive feedback from the teachers.After this step, and
after are able to articulate the worlds and structures and comprehend their meanings, they
become ready to communication tasks and get things done. Communication language learning
(CLL) is the method that is implied after the learners are familiar with the dictation and
pronunciation of the words and structures.
10.6 Communicative language learning (CLL)
Community language learning (CLL) is language-teaching method in which students work
together to develop what aspects of a language they would like to learn. It is based on
the Counseling-approach in which the teacher acts as a counsellor and a paraphraser, while the
learner is seen as a client and collaborator. The CLL emphasizes the sense of community in the
learning group, it encourages interaction as a vehicle of learning, and it considers as a priority the
students' feelings and the recognition of struggles in language acquisition (Curran, 1969). When
the learner got familiar with the surface structure, it is time to use them to make meaningful
conversation and get things done.
10.7 Ideology and rationale behind the course design
According to the interview that the researcher did, those learners who are highly proficient in
English, believe that the agents in Famagusta need to improve their English to higher levels.
They believe that they should know some more necessary words and structures rather than just
greeting and telling the type and time of the flights. Those learners say that usually we are not
satisfied of our flights because of the agents’ lack of ability to explain correct and in detail about
the flight.
For each step of the course design there is a rationale that is discussed in the following sentences:
The rationale of Audio lingual method:repetition is beneficial in a way that it could increase the
ability of the mind (considering mind as muscle) and help the learners to retrieve their implicit
knowledge easier (Kachroo, 1962; Saragi et al., 1978).
The rationale of communicative language learning:when there is a meaningful converasation
task, the focus is mostly on the quality of learning, and according to the “levels of processing
hypothesis” (Craik and Lockhart, 1972), the most important factor in learning is the quality of
mental activity in the mind of the learners at the moment that learning takes place.
The rationale of choosing highly frequent items: If the learners need to learn English for specific
purposes, they should learn the most sensible words and structures accordingly. They should
learn merely the words needed but move from the highly frequent ones to the less frequent ones.
If they learn the most frequent words and structure at the beginning, because the syllabus is
spiral, they would learn the most necessary and needed items efficiently. Consequently, they
would have a successful communication that would lead to the customer and the agent
satisfaction (Hindmarsh, 1980). So “learn what you need”.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 157
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
The rationale of considering learning strategies while designing the course: Good language
learners have their own language strategies and if we want our students become successful
language learners we should introduce those learning strategies to them. The philosophy
autonomous learning assumes that everybody is free to learn something in any way he/she likes
(Wong, 1983; Naiman et al., 1996).
The rationale of spaced retrieval in this course design: The rationale behind spaced retrieval is
the same as audio lingual method because in both cases they appraise the benefits of repetition.
What’s more, the learners need time to comprehend the already learned knowledge.
The rationale of teachability in this course design:in learning structure, there is a sequencing
system that learners follow while learning and teaching cannot change the sequence in which the
structures are learned. Based on this, and based on the fact that the psychological complexity of a
structure depends on the amount of rearranging that is needed, it is better to sequence the
structures in a way that teaching becomes more efficient (Pienemann, 1988).
The rationale of following four strands of language learning:The rough rule of thumb is that on
average roughly equal time should be given to each of the four strands of language learningin the
total experience of the learner (Nation and Macalister, 2010).
The rationale of considering motivation:Two broad philosophies, rational and behavioral, differ
in their foundational beliefs about human nature. Rational philosophy assumes that people are
able to make assessments of their surroundings, and recognize and work towards goals (implicit
motivation). In contrast, behavioral philosophy assumes that all behaviors are learned, and that
people are not able to recognize goals and work towards them. Behaviors are shaped by the
reinforcement that is received (explicit motivation) (Motivating employees, (n.d.).
In Peninsula Builders
Exchange. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.constructionplans.org/motivatingemployees.htm)
The rationale of different corrective feedbacks: unless the teachers do not reflect on the learners’
performance, how would they know about their progress and mistakes (Ellis, 2009)? When the
learners learn language differently (group vs. individual, speed, medium, representation of
information, etc.), they need different feedbacks accordingly (Ellis, 2009).
11 The suggested module
The entry of the design is goal (backward syllabus) and other factors are analyzed accordingly.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 158
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
compreh
ension
greeting
(Good
morning
, Good
afternoo
n,
or Good
evening;
It’s nice
to meet
you or P
leased to
meet
you;
How
have you
been?;
How can
I help
you;
welcome
;
welcome
back
express
what you
want
(I want a
...ticket;
Do you
have any
flight for
....?; I
want to
get to
the
destinati
on
by....;I
want to
leave
here
at...; I
want a
round/si
ngle
ticket; I
want to
go/come
back
at...;
ask
question
s
(Do you
have a
cheaper
one?;
what is
the
luggage
limitatio
n?;
(compre
hending
more
complex
sentence
s such
as: will
it be ok
if I bring
40 kg
baggage
?;
between
1st of
july and
5th of
july; is it
ok if you
stay for
2 hours
in
Istanbul
?; there
is a
discount
in this
flight;
servide
is
included
)
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
answer
well you
have to
pay 10
dollar
for every
extra
kilo;
there is
a cheap
flight in
that
period;
yes it's
ok)
ask for
detail
(tourists
)
getting
things
done
Page 159
Volume 5
September
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Issue 2
2018
Section 2: a sample module from week one to week four is introduced in this section
Week 1
session
one
topic: greeting
situation: as a new
customer/ as an old
customer
new words
session
two
topic: greeting
(including previous
session+new lesson)
and express what you
want
situation: as a new
customer/ as an old
customer (more
complex)
grammatical and
functional
components
Previous grammatical
and functional
components + new
ones
online listening
homework of session
one
In session one, conversation (greeting), new words, and listening are covered. greeting is covered
thorough four strands. Accordingly, at first, different forms of greeting, for new and old
customers, are written on the board by the teacher. They are as following:
New customer
Conversation one
C: hello Ms./Mr. good morning
A: good morning my friend, how can I help you?
C: I want a ticket to Tehran please
A: Sure
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 160
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Conversation two
C: hi, good afternoon
A: hello! Welcome to our airline agency, please have a sit!
C: thank you very much, I just want to check the ticket price
A: to where?
C: to Istanbul
A: let me check
C: thank you
Then the students should work them in pair work and repeat them (drill). The suggested
time is 7 minutes, because this task is one subcategory of meaning-focused input and we have
two other meaning-focused input which leads to 7 minutes for each. Then the teacher introduces
the new words, they are as following:
Map, customer, timetable, luggage, passport, return/single ticket, … .
Finally the students will listen to an online conversation in which the link is quoted in the bellow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmEYLMakQ4k
The teacher writes the text of the conversation on the board and the students are supposed to
memorize them for the next session. In session two the process is the same as process one but
more items are added to the course. For example, the following conversation is added in the
second session:
For the new customer
C: Hello Ms/Mr.
A: O hi sir/Ms, how can I help you?
C: I want a ticket from Ercan to Tehran, in 20 th of august, could you please check the price for
me?
A: Sure, please, have a sit (smiling)
Week 2
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 161
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
session
three
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
session one and two +
different types of
tickets
new/old customers
session
four
quiz
session one, two, and
three
A new type of conversation will be added in week two, that is, conversation between the old
customer and the agent.
C: Him Ms. Myor
A: Hi Radi, how is everything? Welcome back!
C: thank you, like always, I want a ticket from Ercan to Berlin
A: OK, let me check which one is the cheapest…there is a cheap flight for you, but I don’t think
you would like it
C: why?
A: because your luggage will not be transited to the Berlin, you should deliver it in Istanbul
C: O no, please check the cheapest one with the luggage transition
A: OK, there is one for 800 Tl
C: that’s ok
A: please give me your passport
C: sure
In session four the students continue this conversation and add the following sentences:
A: how are you going to pay?
C: like always, I’ll pay cash
In addition, in session four, the students will get familiar with the flight ticket and the new words
in the ticket will be introduced as the necessary words of week two:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 162
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 163
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
ATLASJET HAVACILIK A.Ş.
EskiHalkali Cad. No:5/B Florya ISTANBUL
Tel: 0 (212) 663 20 00 Fax: 0(212) 663
27 51 Büyükmükellefler V.D.:
3300184822
web: www.atlasjet.com
email:atlas@atlasjet.com
CALL CENTER / ÇAĞRI
MERKEZİ:
0850 222 00 00
TAHRAN MERKEZ OFİS: 0098 21
8888 00 11
ACENTA / DUZENLENDIGI YER
SHABAVIZ PARVAZ (IRAN)
IATA CODE:KK / 17.02.2014 08:17
6102424121743
PASSENGER NAME / YOLCUNUN ISMI
SAEID SAADATMANESH (ADLT)
AIRLINE DATA / PNR: H5646A
ENDORSEMENT / RESTRICTIONS: Economy Plus
ELECTRONIC PASSENGER TICKET / ELEKTRONIK YOLCU BILETI
Flight
Date
From
To
Departure Arrival Class Status Baggag
Uçuş
No
Tarih
Nereden
Nereye
Kalkış
Varış Sınıf Durum Bagaj
KK6571 19.02.2014
TAHRAN
ISTANBUL
(Ataturk)
05:30
07:10
KK1012 19.02.2014
X ISTANBUL
(Ataturk)
ERCAN
09:30
X
11:00
X: Transfer
N.V.B. : Not Valid Before / İ.G.Tarihi : İlk GeçerlilikTarihi
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 164
OK
30KG
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
N.V.A. : Not Valid After / S.G.Tarihi : Son GeçerlilikTarihi
Your fare details/ ÜcretDetayları:
Fare / Ücret:
202 USD
SN. SAEID SAADATMANESH
Taxes, Fees, Charges / Vergi, Harç, Masraf: 17 USD
0 USD
Surcharge / Harç:
Payment Type / Ödeme Tipi:
NakitDolar
Total / Toplam:
Firm Name / Firma Adı:
SF / HizmetBedeli:
Grand Total / GenelToplam :
219 USD
35 USD
-
(Tax Base / VergiMatrahı : 0 USD)
Tax Office-Tax Number / VergiDai
-
(0 USD Tax is included to the tickets fare /
KDV BiletBedelineDahildir.)
Address/Adres:
-
254 USD
(219USD)
Week 3
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 165
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
session
five
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
week one
and two
complex
conversation
tasks
session
six
reviewing
session five
working on
homework of
session five
more
complex
listening
tasks
homework
for session
six
More complex conversation:
The new customer:
C: Hello Ms./Mr.
A: Hi sir/Ms, welcome to our agency, how can I help you
C: I want to to buy a ticket but I am not sure whether I have enough money with me or not
A: Then let me change the prices for you….where do you want to go?
C: To Nigeria, Zaria
A: when?
C: Next week
A: (while waiting)…would you like anything to drink?
C: No thanks I’m good
A: OK…the cheapest flight for the next week is 1900 TL return
C: No Ms/Mr. I want a single ticket
A: Then the price would be 1000 TL
C: That’s good, please reserve it for me
A: Sure…please give me your passport
C: There you are
A: how are you going to pay it?
C: Credit card
A: Alright…could you inter you password?
C: Sure
A: Here you are… have a safe trip and nice to meet you…I hope to see you again
C: Thank you…nice to meet you too
In addition to the conversation, the listening was more complex as well:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 166
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X56vLEYKBqE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjaCjVAy-sE
Session six is the review of session five, but the teacher writes down the conversations of the
listening and the students are students are supposed to role play them in week four.
Week 4
session
seven
session
eight
Role play
quizz
reviewing
week one,
two, and
three
doing the
excercise of
English
vocabulary
in use
(intermediate
) as the
homework
the tasks and
conversation
s gets more
complex
review session
seven
new
new listening
vocabularies
convesation to
are
reserve a tour
introduced
In session seven, the learners role play the listening conversation of the previous session and then
the items covered in previous sessions are all reviewed again, the new complex conversation is
taught
through
an
online
conversation
in
the
flight
agency:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkieQSzK9hY
The learners, in this session, get familiar with the tour brochures, here is an example:
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 167
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Summary
The movement and main units of the design is displayed in figure bellow:
goals
environment
analysis
needs
analysis
evaluation
content
format and
presentation
sencequence
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 168
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
References
Amin, M. Y. M. (2017). English Language Teaching Methods and Reforms in English
Curriculum in Iraq; an Overview. Journal of University of Human Development (UHDJ),
3(3), 578-583.
Amin, M. Y. M. (2017). Communication Strategies and Gender Differences; A case study.
International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926,
4(3), 226-238.
Amin, M. Y. M., & Rahimi, A. (2018). Challenges Faced by Novice EFL Teachers.
International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926,
5(1), 149-166.
Amin, M. Y. M. (2018). The Effectiveness of “Training Course for English Teachers In Iraqi
Kurdistan” and Improving Teachers’ Confidence. International Journal of Humanities
and Cultural Studies (IJHCS) ISSN 2356-5926, 5(1), 137-148.
Backhaus, P. (2007). Linguistic landscape: a comparative study of urban multilingualism in
Tokyo. Clevedon-Buffalo-Toronto: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Pp. x, 158.
Brunfit, C. (1985). English as an international language: what do we mean by “English”, in
language and literature teaching: from practice to principle. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975).Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic
memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268-284.
Curran, C. A.(1969). Counseling, psychotherapy, and the unified Person.Journal of Religion
and Mental Health, 58, 49-51.
Dubin, F., &Olshtain, E. (1986).Curriculum design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types.English Language Teaching
Journal, 63, 97-107.
Fries, C. (1945).Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
Hindmarsh, R. (1980). Cambridge English lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 169
Volume 5
September
Issue 2
2018
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926
Kachroo, J. N.( 1962). Report on an investigation into the teaching of vocabulary in the first
year of English. Bulletin of the Centural Institute of English, 2, 67-72.
McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (1999). English vocabulary in use: elementary. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M., & O’Dell, F. (1999). English vocabulary in use: upper-intermediate and
advanced. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H.H. &Todesco, A. (1996). The good language learner.
Montreal: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J. (2010). Learning curriculum design. London: Routledge.
Pienemann, M., Johnson, M., & Brindly, G. (1988). Constructing an acquisition-based procedure
for second language assessment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 217-243.
Redman, S. (1997). English vocabulary in use: pre-intermediate and intermediate. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wong F. L. (1983). The language learner as an individual: implications of research on
individual differences for the ESL teacher. In Clarke, M. A.&Handscombe, J. (eds), On
TESOL ’82, 157–173.
http://www.ijhcs.com/index.php/ijhcs/index
Page 170