International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
Improvement of Voltage Stability by Optimal
Placement and Sizing of Static Var Compensator
using Particle Swarm Optimization
K. D. Joshi (Associate Professor)
Department of Electrical Engineering
G. H. Raisoni college of Engineering
Nagpur, India.
Arshi Ansari (Project Scholar)
Department of Electrical Engineering
G. H. Raisoni college of Engineering
Nagpur, India.
Abstract— In this paper, Particle Swarm optimization (PSO)
algorithm is used to determine the optimal placement and size of
Static Var Compensator in transmission network. The objective
function is defined to minimize voltage deviation and power loss
and combination of voltage deviation and Power loss. The
results are tested on IEEE 5 bus and 14 bus system with the help
of MATLAB. Optimal placement of SVC is verified by voltage
sensitivity method. Optimal sizing of SVC is verified by Power
World Simulator.
Keywords— Static Var compensator, Voltage Deviation, Power
loss, Particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO)
I. INTRODUCTION
Today, Electricity demand is increased as number of
industries is increasing day by day. Electricity consumption is
becoming high in commercial and residential areas also. The
electric utilities are suffering from different government
policies, electricity theft and loss of generation. High
consumption of electricity causes increase in number of
transmission line in power network, which results in complex
power system. Hence, utilization of electrical power is more
as compare to generation. Result is, Power systems are
running closer to stability. Voltage stability is defined as
ability of power system to maintain acceptable voltages at all
buses in normal as well as after being subjected to
disturbance [1]. The voltage instability may occur when a
power system is heavily loaded in transmission line and lacks
in local reactive power sources [2].
The reactive power sources are power electronic
devices known as Flexible alternative current transmission
system (FACTS) which helps in preventing voltage
instability [3].Facts devices include Static var Compensator
(SVC), Thyristor controlled series compensator (TCSC),
unified power flow controller (UPFC) etc [4][5]. Several
methods like genetic algorithm (GA), reactive power spot
price index (QSPI), simulated annealing (SA), artificial
immune system (AIS) are used for optimal placement of
Static Var compensator. In [6], considering more critical
contingencies, GA is applied for minimizing real power loss,
voltage deviation and rating of SVC for optimal placement of
IJERTV4IS050280
SVC. In [7], Optimal placement of SVC is done using QSPI
technique which explains optimal placement of SVC reduces
real and reactive power spot prices, real power loss,
generation cost etc. In [8], simulated annealing technique is
used for optimal location to install VAR Sources. It also finds
the type and sizes of VAR sources as well as setting of VAR
sources at different loading condition. In [9], optimal
placement of SVC is done by maximizing loading where nonlinear programming problem is used which include binary
decisions for actual placement of SVC. In [10], optimal
location of three SVC’s were identified through Particle
Swarm Optimization (PSO) where Voltage Stability Index
(VSI) is used as the main objective function. Minimum value
of VSI at particular bus shows optimal bus for SVC
placement.
After reviewing above papers, it clears the idea that
there are many modern methods which are used for optimal
placement of SVC. In this paper, optimal placement of SVC
is done with the help of one of the modern method like PSO.
This paper also include optimal sizing of SVC.As SVC is
costly, its size is also important. Hence this paper determines
optimal placement and sizing of SVC. Second part of this
paper shows information related to SVC. Third part of this
paper shows basics of PSO and its algorithm. Fourth part of
this paper comprises of problem formulation where voltage
deviation (VD) and power (real and reactive both power) loss
are used as two main objective function. Minimized value of
VD, Power loss and VD+Ploss with different sizes of SVC
are found out. Fifth part of this paper shows simulation
results. At particular bus minimum VD and minimum power
loss and minimum size of SVC, Minimum VD +Ploss these
four criterions helps in finding optimal placement of SVC.
II. STATIC VAR COMPENSATOR
Static Var Compensator is shunt connected FACTS
device. Means it is installed in parallel with a bus. This
device is able to generate or absorb reactive power at location
where it is placed .SVC is made up of mechanically switched
reactor, Thyristor controlled reactor (TCR), Thyristor
Switched Capacitor (TSC), Harmonic Filter and mechanically
switched capacitor. If load is capacitive, TCR consume VARs
and lower system voltage. If load is inductive, capacitor
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
183
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
banks are switched on to supply VARs and higher system
voltage. Hence, SVC consumes or supply reactive power to
compensate voltage. The equivalent diagram of SVC having
fixed capacitor FC with TCR is shown in Fig.1.This
combination provides a fast variable source of reactive
power.
Fig 1: Equivalent Circuit of SVC
III. BASIC CONCEPT OF PARTICLE SWARM
OPTIMIZATION
The PSO is based on the behavior of colony of
living things like colony or swarm of insects such as ants,
bees, termites, wasps. PSO is inspired by a flock of birds and
fish schooling [11], [12]. PSO is population based algorithm.
The word “Particle” denotes a bird in a flock or bee in a
colony.” Swarm” means moving particles which have certain
velocity. ”Optimization” means obtaining best results from
given circumstances.
The PSO algorithm was originally proposed by
Kennedy and Eberhart in 1995.They proposed an algorithm
where each particle is located randomly in space. Particle is
assumed to have two characteristics a) Position b) Velocity.
Each particle wonders around in the space and
remembers its best position .This individual best position
(obtained by using its own knowledge) is called “Pbest”.
Particle achieve best position in a group (obtained by sharing
knowledge among a group) is called “Gbest”. Individuals or
particles in swarm, approach the optimum through its current
velocity, earlier experience and the knowledge of its
neighbors [13].The formulae used to find modified position
and velocity are shown in equation (1) and (2).
Xi (t ) Xi (t 1) Vi (t )
Vi (t ) w *Vi (t 1) 1* rnd1* ( Pi Xi (t 1))
2 * rnd 2 * ( Pg Xi (t 1))
Vi (t ) Inertia Cognitive Social .
Pi
=
Pg
=
rnd1& rnd2 =
Individual best position (Pbest)
Global best position
Two random numbers in the
range of (0,1)
Equation (3) shows three components.
First component shows the term inertia which
develop the tendency of the particle to carry on in the similar
direction in which it was moving.[14]shows, inertia weight is
used in original version of PSO to equilibrium the local and
global search during the optimization process.
Second component shows the linear pull towards the
best position found by the given particle. This component is
known as “self-knowledge”.
Third component shows linear pull towards the
position found by any particle .This component is known as
“group knowledge.
A. PSO Algorithm:
Consider an objective function which has to maximize or
minimize.
Suppose Minimize
Take minimize function to be F(X).
With Xl ≤ X ≤ Xu
Where ,
Xl
Lower limits of X
Xu
Upper limits of X
Here F(X) is given in equation 5 and 6.
Initial SVC size used in PSO algorithm is given in table
below.
Table 1: Initial SVC Size
Sr.No.(j)
SVC Size (p.u)
1
0.16
2
0.22
3
0.33
4
0.25
5
0.4
6
0.028
7
8
0.37
0.38
9
0.19
10
0.125
(1)
(2)
(3)
Where ,
Xi (t)
Xi (t-1)
Vi (t)
Vi (t-1)
w
Ф1 & Ф2
IJERTV4IS050280
=
=
=
=
=
=
New particle position
Previous position
New particle Velocity
Previous Velocity
Inertia Weight
Two positive numbers
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
184
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
The PSO algorithm is explained using following steps:
Start
C. Problem Formulation:
The aim of optimization problem is to minimize voltage deviation
and power loss.
In particle swarm optimization, objective function is given as
follows,
Size of swarm, N=10
Insert initial 10 SVC Size i.e j=10
(4)
F = F1+F2 = VD + Ploss
Where,
Set iteration number, i=1
VD =
Voltage deviation
Ploss =
Network real power loss
Find Pbest with highest value of objective function for jth particle
F1= VD = ( | Vi –Vref | / Npq )
(5)
Where,
Find Gbest with highest value of F(x) for any svc size among N=10, number
of SVC using equation 5 and 6
Find Velocity of j in ith iteration using equation (2)
Vdev =
Voltage Deviation
Vref =
load bus reference voltage value =1
Vi
=
load bus voltage
Npq =
load bus number
Find position of particle j in ith iteration using equation (1)
Subject to 0.95 < Vm (per unit) <1.1.
No
If f(x1) ---f(x10) are same .i.e
converges to one value
i=i+1
F2 = Ploss = Σ gk [Vi2 + Vj2 – 2 Vi V j cos θij ] (6)
Where,
gk =
Conductance
Yes
Vi =
Sending end voltage
Vj =
Receiving end voltage
θij =
Angle between Viand Vj
Stop
Fig 2: PSO Algorithm flowchart
IV.SIMULATION RESULT
B. PSO Parameters:
Studies on PSO shows that, the particles diverge from its required
position i.e go to infinity called explosion. Hence to control this
explosion inertia weight ‘w’ is used. Value of ’w’ gradually reduces
over time. Ф1 and Ф2 are called acceleration constant .They controls
the travelling of each particle towards its individual best and global
best position. Small value of them limits movement of particle while
large value may cause particles to diverge [15]. Hence it is necessary
to define the values of these particles accurately. Table 1 Shows,
PSO parameters used in this paper.
A. Particle Swarm Optimization
IEEE - 5 bus system shown in Fig 3.
North
Lake
Main
Table 2: PSO parameters
Parameters
PSO
Population Size
10
Inertia weight
0.9-0.4
Constant Ф1
1.4
Constant Ф2
1.4
No. of Iterations
20
IJERTV4IS050280
South
Elm
Fig 3: IEEE 5 bus system
IEEE 5 bus data is taken from [16]. Matlab programming with SVC
and without SVC are taken from [17]. Matlab programming for
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
185
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
IEEE-14 bus test system (shown in Fig-5).
PSO is taken from [18].Results are tested not including SVC,
including SVC and with PSO.
Table No 3 shows, load buses where SVC is connected. For
load buses SVC size , total Voltage deviation , power loss
and combination of total voltage deviation and power loss is
given .
Table 3: Results with SVC and PSO
Bus no
SVC size
in p.u
Min VD
(p.u)
Ploss
(p.u)
2
0.6540
0.4843
0.069
Min
VD+Ploss
(p.u)
0.5533
3
1.6594
0.1032
0.063
0.1662
4
5
1.5021
3.0116
0.0598
0.2491
0.061
0.067
0.1208
0.3161
As shown in table no.3,VD , Ploss and VD + Ploss are
minimum at bus number 4.SVC size is minimum at bus
number 2 but VD, Ploss, VD + Ploss values are more as
compare to bus number 4.Another minimum size is 1.5021 at
bus number 4. This also explained in Fig.3, where ‘bus
number’ is scale on X-axis. On Y-axis SVC size (p.u), Min
VD (p.u), Ploss (p.u) and VD + Ploss (p.u) are shown Which
shows, optimal placement of SVC is at bus number 4 and
optimal size of SVC is 1.5021(p.u) for IEEE 5 bus system.
Fig 5: IEEE 14 Bus System
The program is run for different load buses of the IEEE 14
bus and results are shown in table 4 given below.
Table 4:Results with SVC and PSO for IEEE 14 bus system.
Bus no
VD(p.u)
Svc size
Ploss
VD+Poss
4
5
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
0.0091
0.0103
0.0099
0.018
0.0291
0.0232
0.0256
0.0109
0.0445
1
1
0.16
1
1
1
0.88
0.86
0.92
0.1891
0.1884
0.1894
0.1985
0.227
0.2508
0.2991
0.235
0.2894
0.1982
0.1988
0.1992
0.2165
0.2561
0.274
0.3247
0.2459
0.3339
As shown in table no. 4, VD, Ploss and VD + Ploss are
minimum at bus number 5. Svc size is minimum at bus
number 6 but other values are high as compare to bus number
5.The same idea is explained by fig 6.On X axis ‘bus
number’ is scaled . On Y-axis SVC size(p.u), Min VD(p.u),
Ploss(p.u) and VD+Ploss (p.u) are shown Which shows,
optimal placement and size of SVC is at bus number 9 and
optimal size of SVC is 0.16 (p.u).
1.2
Fig 4: ‘Bus no.’ Vs ‘SVC Size, Minimum Voltage Deviation (p.u) and Ploss
(p.u), VD+Ploss (p.u)’for IEEE 5 bus System
1
0.8
VD(p.u)
Svc size
0.6
Ploss
0.4
VD+Poss
0.2
0
0
5
10
15
Fig 6: ‘Bus no.’ Vs ‘SVC Size, Minimum Voltage Deviation (p.u) and Ploss
(p.u), VD+Ploss(p.u)’for IEEE 14 bus System
IJERTV4IS050280
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
186
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
B. Voltage Sensitivity:
Optimal placement of SVC is done by another approach i.e
using Voltage sensitivity method.
Voltage sensitivity is given by formula,
(6)
Where VSF = Voltage sensitivity factor
VM = Voltage magnitude of bus
The bus where voltage sensitivity factor is highest that bus is
best for placement of SVC.
Fig.7 :Power world IEEE 5 bus system without SVC
Table 5: .Average of Voltage sensitivity for IEEE 5 bus
system
Bus Number
Average of voltage sensitivity
3
-0.0093
4
0.02845
5
0.02664
Average of Voltage sensitivity for IEEE 5 bus system is
highest at bus number 4 shows optimal place for SVC.
Table: 6: Average of Voltage sensitivity for IEEE 14 bus
system
Bus Number
Average of voltage sensitivity
4
-0.00974
5
-0.00804
6
0.000309
9
-0.02939
10
-0.03097
11
-0.02279
12
-0.017
13
-0.01648
14
-0.0323
Fig.8:Power world IEEE 5 bus system with SVC at bus 4
Table7: IEEE 5 bus result with 1.5 sizes of SVC with Power
World Simulator
Bus number
VD (p.u)
3
0.0062
4
5
0.0053
0.0105
C.2 IEEE 14 bus diagram without SVC and with SVC
IEEE 14 bus system is shown in fig. Without SVC p.u
voltages at the buses are less as compared to With SVC of
size p.u connected at bus number 6.
Average of Voltage sensitivity for IEEE 14 bus system is
highest at bus number 6 shows optimal place for SVC.
C.Power World Simulator
C.1 IEEE 5 bus diagram without SVC and with SVC:
Optimal size of SVC is verified by Power World Simulator.
IEEE 5 bus system is shown in fig.7 & 8.Where, Without
SVC p.u voltages at the buses are less as compared to With
SVC of size 1.p.u connected at bus number 4.
Fig. 9: Power world IEEE 14 bus system without SVC
IJERTV4IS050280
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
187
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 05, May-2015
VI. REFERENCES:
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
Fig.10 Power world IEEE 14 bus system with SVC at bus number 6
Table 7: IEEE 14 bus result with 0.16 (p.u) sizes of SVC with
Power World Simulator
Bus number
VD(p.u)
4
0.000303
5
0.000303
6
0.000288
9
0.00159
10
0.004562
11
0.00256
12
0.006456
13
0.0052
14
0.002872
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
V. CONCLUSION:
A. Chakraborti, D.P. Kothari, A.K. Mukhopadhyay, A. De,“ An
introduction to Reactive Power Control and Voltage Stability in Power
Transmission Systems”, 1st edition, Prentice Hall India, 2010.
J.R. Shin, B.S. Kim, J.B. Park, K.Y. Lee, A new optimal routing
algorithm for loss minimization and voltage stability improvement in
radial power systems, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22 (May
(2)) (2007) 648–657.
N.Yorino, E.E.El-Araby,H Sasaki,and Sh. Harada,”A new formulation
for FACTS allocation for security enhancement against voltage
collapse.”
L.Gyugi ,”Power electronics in electric utilities: Static Var
Compensators,” proc. of the IEEE, vol. 76,no 4,pp 483-494,Apr1988.
N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi ,”Understanding FACTS Concepts and
Technology of Flexible AC transmission Systems,” Piscataway: IEEE
Press 1999.
Shishir Dixit, Laxmi Srivastava, Ganga Agnihotri,”Optimal placement
of SVC for minimize of Power loss and improving voltage profile
using GA.”978-1-4799-2900-9/14/$31.00 ,2014 IEEE.
Singh J.G, Singh S.N, Srivastava S.C,”An Approach for optimal
placement of static Var compensators based on reactive Power Spot
price.”IEEE Trans.Power Syst.vol 22,No. 4,pp 2021-2029,2007.
Hsio.Y,T,Liu C.C,Chiang H.D,”A new approach for optimal VAR
sources planning in large scale Electric Power Systems.”IEEE
Trans.Power Syst,vol 8,pp988-996,1993.
Minguez R,Milano F,Zaratc-Minamo R,Conejo A,”Optimal Network
Placement of SVC Devices.”IEEE Trans.Power System,vol 22,No.4,pp
1851-1861,2007.
K.Sundareswaran, Hariharan.B, Fawas Palasseri , Daniel Sanju
Antony,and Binyamin Subair ,”Optimal Placement of Static VAr
Compensators (SVC’s) Using Particle Swarm Optimization” 978-14244-8542-0/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE
J.Kennedy, and R.Eberhart, ”Particle Swarm Optimization.” in Proc.
1995 IEEE International Conf. on Neural Network,vol 4,pp.1942_1948.
J.Kennedy, and R.Eberhart ,”A New Optimization using Particle
Swarm Theory,”in proc. 6th Int. symp. Micro Machine and Human
Science 1995, pp39-43.
R.Eberhart, Y.Shi ,” Particle Swarm Optimization: Development,
application and resources,” .in IEEE Proc. Int. Conf, Evolutionary
Computation ,Volume 1,2001.
Yamille del Valle, Ganesh Kumar Venayagamoorthy, Salman
Mohagheghi, Jean-Randy L Haupt,Sue Ellent Haupt,”Practical Genetic
Algorithm”Second Edition.
Carlos Hernandez and Ronald G. Harley, “Particle Swarm
Optimization: Basic Concepts, Variants and Applications in Power
Systems ”,IEEE Transactions on evolutionary computations, Vol. l2,
No 2.,April 2008
H. Saadat, ”Power System Analysis.-2002”McGraw Hill, Higher
Education (ISBN 0-07-284-869-3)
Enrique Acha ”FACTS-Modeling and Simulation in power Networks”
,Willey Publication.(ISBN 0-470-85271-2)
Y.Shuyuan, M.Wnag, and L. Jiao ,”A Quantum Particle Swarm
Optimization ,”Proc. of the conf. on Evolutionary Computation
2004,pp.320-324.
The result obtained from the IEEE 5 bus and 14 bus system
test shows that the PSO algorithm is very efficient in finding
minimum SVC size, voltage deviation and power loss
,Voltage deviation +Ploss (p.u).Hence optimal placement of
SVC in IEEE 5 bus system is at bus number 4. And optimal
size of SVC is1.5021 p.u. Similarly in IEEE 14 bus system,
optimal placement of SVC is bus number 6 and optimal size
of SVC is 0.16 p.u. optimal placement is justified by voltage
sensitivity method and optimal sizing is justified by Power
world simulator.
IJERTV4IS050280
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
188