This article was downloaded by:[Indian Institute of Technology]
On: 25 March 2008
Access Details: [subscription number 791119987]
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Journal of the Textile Institute
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t778164490
Stress-strain characteristics of different spun yarns as a
function of strain rate and gauge length
A. Ghosh a; S. M. Ishtiaque b; R. S. Rengasamy b
a
Department of Textile Technology, Kumaraguru College of Technology,
Coimbatore-641006, India.
b
Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz
Khas, New Delhi-110016, India.
Online Publication Date: 01 March 2005
To cite this Article: Ghosh, A., Ishtiaque, S. M. and Rengasamy, R. S. (2005)
'Stress-strain characteristics of different spun yarns as a function of strain rate and
gauge length', Journal of the Textile Institute, 96:2, 99 - 104
To link to this article: DOI: 10.1533/joti.2004.0067
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/joti.2004.0067
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf
This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction,
re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly
forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be
complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be
independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings,
demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or
arising out of the use of this material.
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
Stress–strain characteristics of different spun
yarns as a function of strain rate and gauge
length
A. Ghosh1, S. M. Ishtiaque2 and R. S. Rengasamy2
1
2
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
Department of Textile Technology, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore-641006, India
Department of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi-110016, India
Abstract: The influence of strain rates and gauge lengths on the characteristics of the stress–strain
curves of ring, rotor, air-jet, and open-end friction spun yarns is investigated. A modified form of
Vangheluwe’s model is used in describing the stress–strain characteristics of spun yarns. The proposed
model can fairly well replicate these characteristics.
Key words: Stress-strain, gauge length, strain rate, relaxation time, Maxwell element, non-linear
spring, catastrophic.
fact that the mechanical properties of spun yarns are timedependent phenomena because of the visco-elastic nature
of textile yarn. Vangheluwe (1992) has shown that the
tensile curve of a range of spun yarns (cotton, viscose,
and polyester/cotton blends) can be reasonably predicted
with a model based on a Maxwell element. Hence, in the
second part of this paper, an attempt has been made to fit
the stress–strain curves of various spun yarns using
Vangheluwe’s proposed model describing the tensile curve
of spun yarns with a modification.
INTRODUCTION
The tensile properties of yarns play a phenomenal role in
the processability and quality of the end products. However,
the values of yarn tenacity and breaking strain represent
only about the terminal point of the stress–strain curve.
In many situations, knowledge of the full course of the
stress–strain curves is more desirable, since it provides
the whole information about the behavior of stresses under
various levels of strains. The behavior of the stress–strain
curve of spun yarns is not only a function of the nature
and structural arrangement of the constituent fibres in
the yarns; the variation of rate of straining and gauge
length also play a key role in defining the characteristics
of stress–strain curves.
Stress–strain curves are widely described in the literature
for continuous filament yarns (Hearle and Thakur, 1961;
Hearle, 1969; Furter, 1985; Realff et al., 2000). However,
the reported information for spun yarns on this aspect is
very limited (Chattopadhyay, 1999; Vangheluwe, 1992).
The influence of testing parameters on the stress–strain
characteristics of spun yarns (Rengasamy et al., 2004) and
tensile failure of spun yarns as a function of yarn structure
and testing parameters (Ghosh et al., 2004) are reported.
The first part of this paper reports on the influence of
various levels of strain rate and gauge length on the stress–
strain curves of various spun yarns. It is an established
EXPERIMENTAL
Ring, rotor, air-jet, and open-end friction yarns having
yarn count of 31.7, 30.6, 28.1, and 32.6 tex, respectively,
were spun from viscose fibres. To study the stress–strain
curves, these yarns were conditioned at 65% RH and
25°C for 24 hours and, subsequently, tensile tests were
performed at strain rates of 0.1, 1, and 10 per min, at a
constant gauge length of 500 mm. An Instron tensile tester
was used for the lower strain rates, and an Uster Tensorapid
tester was employed for the higher strain rate (10 per
min). The yarns were also tested at gauge lengths of 50
and 500 mm at a constant strain rate of 1 per min in the
Instron tensile tester. For each set of experiments, 100
tests were conducted. A typical stress–strain curve having
tenacity and breaking strain close to the average values
was selected.
The strain rate u was calculated from the following
expression
Corresponding Author:
Dr R. S. Rengasamy
Dept of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas
New Delhi 110016, India
Tel: 0091 11 2659 1418 Fax: 0091 11 2658 1103
Email: rsr60@hotmail.com
© The Textile Institute
0138
u= v
l
99
(1)
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2 pp. 99–104
6
where v is the rate of extension or speed of testing in
mm/min and l is the test length in mm. The unit of strain
rate is min–1.
10/min
Stress (cN/Tex)
5
INFLUENCE OF STRAIN RATE AND GAUGE LENGTH ON
STRESS–STRAIN CURVES
The stress–strain curves of the different spun yarns tested
at various levels of strain rates, namely 0.1, 1, and 10 per
min at a constant gauge length of 500 mm, are depicted in
Figures 1 to 4. The results show that there are outstanding
1/min
4
3
2
0.1/min
1
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Strain (%)
8
9
10
11 12
20
Figure 4 Stress–strain curves of open-end friction spun
yarn at different strain rates.
10/min
Stress (cN/Tex)
16
1/min
differences among different spun yarns in their stress–
strain behavior. This can be explained in terms of their
structural differences. In addition, the strain rates have
significant influence on the stress–strain responses.
At a constant gauge length (500 mm), a sharp and sudden
fall in stress value is observed after the yarn attains its
peak stress, for ring, rotor, and air-jet yarns at strain rates
of 10 per min and 1 per min. However, for the open-end
friction spun yarn, the stress falls off slowly with increasing
strain, giving the peak a rounded-off shape. The roundedoff portion of the stress–strain region indicates that the
breakage of fibres during yarn extension expands over a
wide range of strain, or, in other words, the yarn breaks
under a non-catastrophic mode of failure. At a slower
strain rate (0.1 per/min), the ring spun yarn shows mostly
catastrophic failure, the rotor spun yarn shows nearly noncatastrophic failure, while the air-jet and open-end friction
spun yarns show non-catastrophic failure.
The change of the failure mechanism of yarns from
non-catastrophic to catastrophic mode with an increase
in strain rate is due to the effect of impact loading, which
is responsible for the simultaneous breakage of fibres at
the same load. But open-end friction spun yarn fails under
non-catastrophic mode even at a higher rate of straining,
since there is a lack of cohesiveness of fibres in the yarn.
At slow strain rates, the yarn failure is non-catastrophic,
as more time is available for the fibres to slip apart. The
non-catastrophic mode of yarn failure at slow strain rates
is more pronounced for air-jet and open-end friction spun
yarns because of reduced fiber interlocking in their
structures.
For every yarn, the curves shift towards the stress axis
with an increase in the strain rate. This phenomenon can
be ascribed to the shorter time available for yarn rupture
hardly allowing for stress relaxation in the fibres at the
high strain rate.
Figures 5 to 8 depict the stress–strain curves of the
different spun yarns tested at two different gauge lengths,
50 mm and 500 mm, at a constant strain rate of 1 per min.
At this constant strain rate, all yarns show catastrophic
failure at 500 mm gauge length except the open-end friction
spun yarn, but all the experimental yarns tested at a gauge
12
8
0.1/min
4
0
0
2
4
6
8
Strain (%)
10
12
14
Figure 1 Stress–strain curves of ring spun yarn at different
strain rates.
14
12
10/min
Stress (cN/Tex)
10
1/min
8
6
0.1/min
4
2
0
0
2
4
6
8
Strain (%)
10
12
14
Figure 2 Stress–strain curves of rotor spun yarn at
different strain rates.
12
10/min
10
Stress (cN/Tex)
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
A. Ghosh, S. M. Ishtiaque and R. S. Rengasamy
1/min
8
6
0.1/min
4
2
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6 7 8
Strain (%)
9
10 11
12 13
Figure 3 Stress–strain curves of air-jet spun yarn at
different strain rates.
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2
100
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
© The Textile Institute
16
7
6
Stress (cN/Tex)
Stress (cN/Tex)
12
500 mm
8
50 mm
4
5
50 mm
4
3
500 mm
2
1
0
0
4
8
12
Strain (%)
16
20
24
0
0
Figure 5 Stress–strain curves of ring spun yarn at different
gauge lengths.
2
4
6
8
10 12 14
Strain (%)
16
18
20
22
Figure 8 Stress–strain curves of open-end friction spun
yarn at different gauge lengths.
12
be adequate to cause sharp and instantaneous breaks.
The stress–strain curves of air-jet spun yarns shows a
definite stick–slip phenomenon and this phenomenon is
more pronounced at lower rates of straining. The stick–
slip phenomenon for air-jet spun yarn can account for its
distinct structural characteristics. Air-jet spun yarn consists
of a majority of fibres in an almost untwisted state in the
core and a surface layer of fibres wrapped around the
core. An occasional slippage of core fibres inside the
wrapper fibres is likely to take place for air-jet yarn under
increasing axial tension. But the stick–slip phenomenon
is not observed for other yarns.
Stress (cN/Tex)
10
8
50 mm
6
4
500 mm
2
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 14 16 18
Strain (%)
20 22
24 26
Figure 6 Stress–strain curves of rotor spun yarn at
different gauge lengths.
10
THEORETICAL MODEL FOR STRESS–STRAIN CURVES
OF SPUN YARNS
9
8
Stress (cN/Tex)
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
Stress–strain characteristics of different spun yarns as a function of strain rate and gauge length
Vangheluwe (1992) investigated the influence of strain
rates on the stress–strain curves of ring and rotor spun
yarns using a visco-elastic model based on a Maxwell
element. In her model, a nonlinear spring is placed in
parallel with a Maxwell element (Fig. 9). The behavior of
the nonlinear spring was assumed as
50 mm
7
6
5
500 mm
4
3
2
1
σ2 = D ε 2
0
0
2
4
6
8
10 12 14 16 18 20
Strain (%)
22
24 26
where σ2 and ε are the stress and strain of the nonlinear
spring, and D is the spring constant (cN/tex). Vangheluwe
obtained a good correlation with the experimental stress–
strain curves. In her proposed model, she simply assumed
that the stress is directly proportional to the square of the
Figure 7 Stress–strain curves of air-jet spun yarn at
different gauge lengths.
length of 50 mm show non-catastrophic failure. The value
of peak stress at 50 mm gauge length is higher than that
of 500 mm gauge length. The difference in the
characteristics of the stress–strain curves at short and
long gauge lengths can be attributed to the fact that the
storage of elastic energy in a yarn under axial tension is a
linearly increasing function of gauge length and the energy
stored in a specimen of longer gauge length is sufficient
to complete the breakage. Therefore, rupture of yarns
tested at the longer gauge length occurs under a catastrophic
mode of failure (Hearle, 1969). On the other hand, energy
stored in a yarn is low at short gauge length and may not
© The Textile Institute
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
(2)
E
σ2 = D ε 2
η
Figure 9 Vangheluwe’s model for describing the tensile
curve of spun yarns.
101
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2
strain for the nonlinear spring. However, in this present
study, the following behavior of the nonlinear spring is
being assumed
σ2 = D ε n
dk from the points to the experimental line. Using ‘genetic
algorithms’ with MATLAB (version 6.5) coding, the sum
of the square of the vertical distances dk is minimized and
the values of A, B, D, and n are calculated for different
spun yarns at strain rates of 0.1/min and 10/min.
The experimental and fitted stress–strain curves for
different spun yarns at strain rates of 0.1/min and 10/
min are shown in Figures 11 to 14. The actual curves are
shown by the solid lines and the corresponding fitted curves
are shown by dotted lines. Generally, a good correlation
between the fitted and experimental curves was obtained.
For all the yarns, the curve shifts towards the stress axis
when the tensile test is executed at higher strain rates.
Thus, the initial modulus increases with the rate of
straining. Also, at certain levels of strain, the stress shows
a greater value for higher strain rates compared to lower
ones.
(3)
where n > 0. A schematic representation of the modified
model is depicted in Fig. 10.
E
σ2 = D ε n
η
Figure 10 Modified Vangheluwe’s model for describing the
tensile curve of spun yarns.
18
10/min strain rate
16
The second-order differential equation governing the
stress–strain behavior of the Maxwell element is given by
14
Stress, cN/tex
12
δ 2 ε = 1 δ 2 σ + 1 ⋅ δσ
(4)
E δt2
η δt
δt2
where σ and ε are the stress (cN/tex) and strain of the
Maxwell element respectively, E is the spring modulus
(cN/tex), and η is the viscosity (cN-s/tex) of the dashpot
in the Maxwell element.
The theoretical relationship between stress and strain
of a spun yarn tested at a constant rate of extension is
obtained by the solution of Equations 3 and 4, which is
written as
σ = A (1 – e
– E ⋅ε
η u)
+ Dε n
σ = A (1 –
) + Dε
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Strain
0.10
0.12
0.14
(5)
12
10/min strain rate
10
(6)
n
0
Figure 11 Experimental and fitted stress–strain curves for
ring yarn at different strain rates.
By replacing the expression of τ in Equation 5, we have
– ε
e uτ
6
0
where A is a constant and u is the strain rate (min ). A
Maxwell element can be characterized by its relaxation
time τ, which is given by
η
E
0.1/min strain rate
8
2
–1
τ=
10
4
Stress, cN/tex
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
A. Ghosh, S. M. Ishtiaque and R. S. Rengasamy
8
0.1/min strain rate
6
4
(7)
2
According to the ISO 2062, a pre-tension of 0.5 cN/tex
has to be given to the yarn while clamping in the tensile
tester. At this pre-tension, strain in the yarn is zero.
Therefore, a correction is made for the pre-tension in
Equation 7. Thus, Equation 7 becomes
σ = 0.5 + A (1 – e–Bε) + Dεn
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Strain
0.10
0.12
0.14
Figure 12 Experimental and fitted stress–strain curves for
rotor yarn at different strain rates.
(8)
where B = 1/u τ. Equation 7 can be fitted on the
experimental tensile curve using a least square method,
i.e. by minimizing the sum of squares of vertical distances
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2
0
Table 1 shows the values of the parameters A, B, D,
and n of the modified Vangheluwe’s model for different
spun yarns at two levels of strain rates. In Table 1, the
102
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
© The Textile Institute
10
the strain rate and spinning technologies. Therefore,
Equation 8 can be rewritten in the following form
10/min strain rate
9
σ = 0.5 + 1.28 (1 – e–Bε) + Dε2/3
8
Stress, cN/tex
7
6
5
4
2
1
0
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
Strain
0.08
0.10
0.12
Figure 13 Experimental and fitted stress–strain curves for
air-jet yarn at different strain rates.
6
10/min strain rate
5
4
0.1/min strain rate
3
2
1
0
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04 0.05
Strain
0.06
0.07
0.08
(9)
The values of B depend on the strain rate u and relaxation
time τ. As at high rate of straining the relaxation time τ
reduces considerably, the values of B thus increases. It is
observed from Table 1 that at all strain rates, the values of
B and D are highest for ring spun yarns followed by rotor,
air-jet, and open-end friction spun yarns. This trend is
exactly similar to the tenacity of the above spun yarns. It
can be expected that the value of the spring constant of
the nonlinear spring D is higher for the stronger yarn. It
is also evident from Table 1 that at all strain rates the
value of relaxation time τ is lowest for ring spun yarn
followed by rotor, air-jet, and open-end friction spun yarns.
A better structural integrity and higher degree of fibre
interlocking of fibres in ring spun yarns produce a shorter
relaxation time τ under tensile loading as compared to
the other yarns. Thus the values of B, which is an inverse
measure of relaxation time τ, are higher for ring yarn
followed by other yarns in the above sequence.
Theoretically, the spring constant D should be
independent of the strain rate. However, it is observed
that D is not independent of the strain rate. The influence
of strain rate on D as compared to the relaxation time τ is
relatively smaller. During the tensile loading in a yarn,
there are many processes contributing to the relaxation in
fibres and yarns, and each process has a different relaxation
time (Vangheluwe, 1992).
0.1/min strain rate
3
Stress, cN/tex
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
Stress–strain characteristics of different spun yarns as a function of strain rate and gauge length
0.09
CONCLUSIONS
At high rates of straining (10 per min and 1 per min),
ring, rotor, and air-jet yarns show catastrophic failure and
open-end friction spun yarn shows mostly non-catastrophic
failure. At a low strain rate (0.1 per min), ring yarn shows
mostly catastrophic failure, rotor yarn shows nearly noncatastrophic failure, and air-jet and open-end friction spun
yarns show non-catastrophic failure. The stress–strain curve
shifts towards the stress axis with an increase in the strain
rate for all yarns. At a high gauge length (500 mm), ring,
rotor, and air-jet spun yarns exhibit catastrophic failure.
On the other hand, non-catastrophic failure is observed
for all the yarns tested at the lower gauge length of 50
Figure 14 Experimental and fitted stress–strain curves for
open-end yarn at different strain rates.
relaxation time τ is also calculated from the values of the
parameter B and strain rate u. It is appreciated that the
relaxation time is notably higher for the lower strain rate
than that of the higher strain rate. A higher relaxation
time obviously causes more stress relaxation, which is
responsible for the decrease in stress at certain levels of
strain for yarns tested at the lower strain rate as compared
to these tested at the higher strain rate. It is evident from
the Table 1 that the values of A and n are independent of
Table 1 Parameters of the modified Vangheluwe’s model as a function of the strain rate
Parameters
A
B
D (cN/Tex)
n
τ (sec)
© The Textile Institute
Ring yarn
Rotor yarn
Air-jet yarn
OE friction yarn
Strain rate
Strain rate
Strain rate
Strain rate
0.1/min
10/min
0.1/min
10/min
0.1/min
10/min
0.1/min
10/min
1.28
52.06
47.69
2/3
11.52
1.28
68.82
61.73
2/3
0.087
1.28
40.82
31.69
2/3
14.69
1.28
61.9
37.34
2/3
0.096
1.28
20.95
27.79
2/3
28.64
1.28
27.73
33.55
2/3
0.216
1.28
10.95
18.13
2/3
54.79
1.28
14.47
21.43
2/3
0.414
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
103
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2
Downloaded By: [Indian Institute of Technology] At: 13:32 25 March 2008
A. Ghosh, S. M. Ishtiaque and R. S. Rengasamy
mm. The stress–strain curve of air-jet spun yarn has kinks
indicating stick–slip phenomenon.
It is possible to describe the tensile curve of spun yarn
using the modified Vangheluwe’s model. The model can
simulate the stress–strain characteristics of spun yarns
with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
Yarns as a Function of Structure and Testing Parameters,
Communicated to Textile Res. J.
HEARLE, J. W. S. and THAKUR, V. M., 1961. The Breakage of
Twisted Yarns, J. Textile Inst., 52, T149–T163.
HEARLE, J. W. S., 1969. Structural Mechanics of Fibres, Yarns and
Fabrics, Vol. 1, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
REALFF, M. L., PAN, N., SEO, M., BOYCE, M. C. and BACKER, S.,
2000. A Stochastic Simulation of the Failure Process and
Ultimate Strength of Blended Continuous Yarns, Textile
Res. J. 70, 415–430.
RENGASAMY, R. S., Ishtiaque, S. M., Ghosh, A. and Patnaik, A.,
2004. The Influence of Strain Rate and Gauge Length on
the Stress–Strain Characteristics of Staple Yarns
Representing Different Spinning Systems, in Proc. 83rd
TIWC, Shanghai, China, 411–414.
VANGHELUWE, L., 1992. Influence of Strain Rate and Yarn
Number on Tensile Test Results, Textile Res. J. 62, 586–589.
REFERENCES
CHATTOPADHYAY, R., 1999. The Influence of the Strain Rate on
the Characteristics of the Load–Elongation Curves of Ringspun and Air-jet Spun Yarns, J. Textile Inst,. 90, 268–271.
FURTER, R., 1985. Strength and Elongation Testing of Single and
Ply Yarns, The Textile Institute, Manchester.
GHOSH, A., ISHTIAQUE, S. M. and RENGASAMY, R. S., 2004.
Analysis of Spun Yarn Failure Part I: Tensile Failure of
JOTI 2005 Vol. 96 No. 2
104
doi:10.1533/joti.2004.0067
© The Textile Institute