Response to: Rho et al. "Deconstructing Chronic Low Back Pain in the Older Adult-Step by Step Evidence and Expert- Based Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment. Part VIII: Lateral Hip and Thigh Pain
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Response to: Rho et al. “Deconstructing Chronic Low Back Pain in the Older Adult-Step by Step Evidence and Expert- Based Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment. Part VIII: Lateral Hip and Thigh Pain” Dear Editor, It was with great interest that we reviewed the article by Rho et al. “Deconstructing Chronic Low Back pain in the Older Adult-Step by Step Evidence and Expert-Based Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment. Part VIII: Lateral Hip and Thigh Pain” [1]. We applaud the authors for addressing this common issue of lateral hip pain, and their thoughtfulness and evidence supported discussion regard- ing the diagnosis of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) rather than the commonly used and inaccurate term “greater trochanteric bursitis.” The authors nicely re- view the literature summarizing that there is a lack of find- ings on MRI and ultrasound, as well as in histological evidence to support the diagnosis of “bursitis” and/or “ten- dinitis” in the vast majority of these patients. Additionally, we fully agree with the authors’ noting that there is a lack of in- flammatory findings in patients suffering from GTPS and that effective treatment consists of strengthening the weak hip abductors that are often noted in these patients. We have found this to be true in the patients we have treated with GTPS. The authors also note the deficiency of evi- dence for the use of corticosteroid injections and both the potential systemic side effects and the now well-known toxic effects of corticosteroids to tenocytes, which they note “can potentially contribute to progressive tendinopathy and partial tears.” It is therefore puzzling that the treatment provided in the clinical case presented in this review was an “ultra- sound-guided greater trochanteric bursa corticosteroid injection.” In fact, in this case (as often occurs in clinical practices across the United States) the patient unfortu- nately underwent two ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections! This treatment would not only appear to be not indicated based upon the current literature cited in the review by Rho et al., but also potentially harmful in this 90-year-old patient with a history of several com- pression fractures. In addition, the known lack of effi- cacy of these injections results in not only a poor outcome but also increased cost. The review failed to include other types of injection treatments for this treat- ment, including simple needle of the tendon, that is, needle tenotomy, ultrasound-guided dextrose injection, or platelet-rich plasma injection (PRP). In a multicenter case series, Mautner et al. noted a significant benefit using PRP on a variety of tendons, including the hip ab- ductor tendons, namely the gluteus minimus and med- ius tendons, which commonly demonstrated tendinopathic changes in these patients. Although the current scientific evidence for efficacy of PRP injection is limited, it is superior to the level of evidence for many current treatments for GTPS and certainly superior to corticosteroid injections [2–4]. In our clinical experience, we have found that a single PRP injection of a high- concentration, leukocyte-poor PRP is effective in 90% of patients suffering from GTPS who have failed other conservative measures without the need for additional interventions. In addition, there have been no harmful ef- fects documented in the literature regarding PRP injec- tion of the tendons inserting onto the greater trochanter. The practice of medicine requires us to provide the most effective evidence-based treatments to patients with the first caveat of “First DO No Harm.” We would argue that injection of corticosteroids for GTPS would not be supported by evidence-based medicine both in terms of effective treatment and avoiding the potential harmful effects. GERARD A. MALANGA, MD, New Jersey Regenerative Institute, Cedar Knolls, New Jersey; Department of PM&R, Rutgers School of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA References 1 Rho M, Camacho-Soto A, Cheng A, et al. Deconstructing chronic low back pain in the older adult-step by step evi- dence and expert-based recommendations for evaluation and treatment. Part VIII: Lateral hip and thigh pain. Pain Med 2017;18(6):1195. 2 Mautner K, Colberg R, Malanga G, et al. Outcomes after ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injections for chronic tendinopathy: A multicenter, retrospective review. PMR 2013;5:169–75. 3 Monto RR. MD Platelet-rich plasma is more effective than cortisone for severe chronic hip burisitis. Paper 778, presented at the AAOS 2014 Annual Meeting, March 11–15, 2014, New Orleans, LA. 4 Massimi S, LaSa lle E, Vongvorachoti J, Lutz G. Ultrasound-guided platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS): A retrospective case series. PMR 2013;5 (9):S206–7. V C 2017 American Academy of Pain Medicine. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 1195 Pain Medicine 2017; 18: 1195 doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw296
Pain Medicine 2017; 18: 1195
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw296
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Response to: Rho et al. “Deconstructing Chronic Low Back Pain in the Older Adult-Step by Step
Evidence and Expert- Based Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment. Part VIII: Lateral Hip
and Thigh Pain”
Dear Editor,
It was with great interest that we reviewed the article by
Rho et al. “Deconstructing Chronic Low Back pain in the
Older Adult-Step by Step Evidence and Expert-Based
Recommendations for Evaluation and Treatment. Part VIII:
Lateral Hip and Thigh Pain” [1]. We applaud the authors for
addressing this common issue of lateral hip pain, and their
thoughtfulness and evidence supported discussion regarding the diagnosis of greater trochanteric pain syndrome
(GTPS) rather than the commonly used and inaccurate
term “greater trochanteric bursitis.” The authors nicely review the literature summarizing that there is a lack of findings on MRI and ultrasound, as well as in histological
evidence to support the diagnosis of “bursitis” and/or “tendinitis” in the vast majority of these patients. Additionally, we
fully agree with the authors’ noting that there is a lack of inflammatory findings in patients suffering from GTPS and
that effective treatment consists of strengthening the weak
hip abductors that are often noted in these patients. We
have found this to be true in the patients we have treated
with GTPS. The authors also note the deficiency of evidence for the use of corticosteroid injections and both the
potential systemic side effects and the now well-known
toxic effects of corticosteroids to tenocytes, which they
note “can potentially contribute to progressive tendinopathy
and partial tears.”
It is therefore puzzling that the treatment provided in the
clinical case presented in this review was an “ultrasound-guided greater trochanteric bursa corticosteroid
injection.” In fact, in this case (as often occurs in clinical
practices across the United States) the patient unfortunately underwent two ultrasound-guided corticosteroid
injections! This treatment would not only appear to be
not indicated based upon the current literature cited in
the review by Rho et al., but also potentially harmful in
this 90-year-old patient with a history of several compression fractures. In addition, the known lack of efficacy of these injections results in not only a poor
outcome but also increased cost. The review failed to
include other types of injection treatments for this treatment, including simple needle of the tendon, that is,
needle tenotomy, ultrasound-guided dextrose injection,
or platelet-rich plasma injection (PRP). In a multicenter
case series, Mautner et al. noted a significant benefit
using PRP on a variety of tendons, including the hip abductor tendons, namely the gluteus minimus and medius
tendons,
which
commonly
demonstrated
tendinopathic changes in these patients. Although the
current scientific evidence for efficacy of PRP injection is
limited, it is superior to the level of evidence for many
current treatments for GTPS and certainly superior to
corticosteroid injections [2–4]. In our clinical experience,
we have found that a single PRP injection of a highconcentration, leukocyte-poor PRP is effective in 90%
of patients suffering from GTPS who have failed other
conservative measures without the need for additional
interventions. In addition, there have been no harmful effects documented in the literature regarding PRP injection of the tendons inserting onto the greater trochanter.
The practice of medicine requires us to provide the
most effective evidence-based treatments to patients
with the first caveat of “First DO No Harm.” We would
argue that injection of corticosteroids for GTPS would
not be supported by evidence-based medicine both in
terms of effective treatment and avoiding the potential
harmful effects.
GERARD A. MALANGA, MD,
New Jersey Regenerative Institute, Cedar Knolls,
New Jersey; Department of PM&R,
Rutgers School of Medicine, New Jersey Medical
School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
References
1 Rho M, Camacho-Soto A, Cheng A, et al. Deconstructing
chronic low back pain in the older adult-step by step evidence and expert-based recommendations for evaluation
and treatment. Part VIII: Lateral hip and thigh pain. Pain
Med 2017;18(6):1195.
2 Mautner K, Colberg R, Malanga G, et al. Outcomes
after ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injections
for chronic tendinopathy: A multicenter, retrospective
review. PMR 2013;5:169–75.
3 Monto RR. MD Platelet-rich plasma is more effective
than cortisone for severe chronic hip burisitis. Paper
778, presented at the AAOS 2014 Annual Meeting,
March 11–15, 2014, New Orleans, LA.
4 Massimi S, LaSa lle E, Vongvorachoti J, Lutz G.
Ultrasound-guided platelet rich plasma (PRP)
injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome
(GTPS): A retrospective case series. PMR 2013;5
(9):S206–7.
C 2017 American Academy of Pain Medicine.
V
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1195
From this background, it becomes important to discuss and analyze the critical thinking of great philosophers such as Aristotle, namely Francis Bacon, a popular figure who exerted a strong influence on subsequent thought. This article will illustrate several things about understanding the elements of science from the point of view of Francis Bacon, the philosophy of science and his restoration in the field of epistemology. The aim of science and see how the method of inductive philosophy came to Bacon. The method used is the modern method of induction. Based on these thoughts, Bacon formulated the basics of modern inductive thinking. According to him, the correct method of induction is induction which starts from the research being studied and painstaking examination of particular data so that in the next stage the ratio can move forward towards the interpretation of nature
En los términos y para los efectos de lo dispuesto, en particular, en los artículos 9º, 12º y 196º del Código de los Derechos de Autor y Derechos Conexos de Portugal, informase que este texto está protegido por derechos de autor, encontrándose registrado en la Inspección General de las Actividades Culturales de Portugal con el nº 4620/2015, y depositado en la Biblioteca Nacional bajo el nº 401687/15.
A field experiment was conducted at the research cum instructional farm, College of Agriculture, Nagpur, Dr. PDKV, Maharashtra during rabi 2021-22 with the objective to find the biophysical and morphological basis of resistance against linseed bud fly (Dasyneura lini Barnes). A set of 36 germplasm was sown in RBD in paired rows of 2 m and a spacing of 45 cm x 10 cm. The results indicated that resistant germplasm against bud fly IC498428 and Jawahar-17 had relatively higher sepal thickness (21.18 and 19.64 µ) as well as lower average infestation recorded (8.19 and 9.75%) while susceptible germplasm IC413173 (49.12%), IC498783 (42.70%), IC498924 (42.48%) and EC011748 (45.00%) exhibited minimum sepal thickness (6.90, 9.28, 9.32 and 8.33 µ, respectively). The character association studies showed a highly significant negative correlation (r =-0.852**) between the thickness of sepals and the percentage of bud fly infestation. The correlation between plant height and bud infestation was negative (-0.042) and non-significant.
Rehana Fathima has stirred a hornet’s nest in the social fabric of Kerala with the photos she posted on her Facebook page of her semi-nude body being painted upon by her children. Her failed bid to enter Sabarimala and her participation in the Kiss of Love movement have really sharpened the vitriolic remarks made against herby the self-styled custodians of tradition/morality.