A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
Refocusing Teacher Education: A Paradigm Shift Towards
Professional Development of Teachers
by
Njoroge J. Mungai
jomush77@yahoo.com
Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa (CEMASTEA)
Abstract
The ultimate purpose of education is nurturing learners to develop relevant knowledge, skills,
and attitudes necessary for peaceful coexistence, and to utilize the environment intelligently to sustain
and improve the standard of living. Effective teachers are among key enabling factors in the
improvement of education towards achieving this critical purpose. Arguably, no society can rise above
the standard of its teachers at all levels of education. Therefore, it is imperative to have in place an
effective teacher education in order to empower teachers with appropriate knowledge, skills, and
attitudes framework to facilitate meaningful learning. By highlighting fundamental and essential
auxiliary components of teacher education, informed by review of selected literature on teacher
education, the ensuing discussion prompts a paradigm shift towards effective preparation of
prospective and practicing teachers especially in developing countries.
Key words: Teacher Education, Meaningful learning, Teacher Professional Development
Fundamentals of Teacher Education
Substantial research evidence indicates that teachers who have had thorough preparation for
teaching are more competent and successful with students than those who had little or none (DarlingHammond, 2000). These teachers facilitate meaningful learning. Novak, Mintzes, and Wandersee
(2000) pose that meaningful learning occurs when learners seek to relate new concepts and
propositions to relevant existing concepts and propositions in their cognitive structures. In light of this,
it can be argued that the worth of any teacher education programme is a function of the extent to which
it upgrades the capacity of the teacher to scaffold meaningful learning. However, a review of trends in
teacher education reveals conflicting and competing beliefs globally on issues as basic as when and
where teachers should be educated, who should educate teachers, and what education is most effective
1
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
in preparing teachers (Levine (2006).
Primarily, teacher education programmes should inculcate into teachers several essential
elements. Content knowledge of what is to be taught to learners is the first essential that needs redress
in teacher education. This is because teachers lacking understanding of subject matter are likely to
misrepresent knowledge to their students (Ball and McDiarmid, 1990) and therefore learners may fail
to acquire appropriate knowledge and skills needed as basis for meaningful learning. Importantly, as
pointed out by Darling-Hammond (2006) content knowledge taught to teachers should be in relation to
the curriculum goals. However, looking at the content knowledge curriculum offered to pre-service
teachers my opinion is that much needs to be done in most of our tertiary institutions in Kenya in terms
of aligning it to curriculum goals. For instance, there are some cases where pre-service teachers
graduate without being exposed to the content they will teach in school.
Secondly, in order to effectively teach appropriate content to students teachers require exposure
to variety of pedagogical knowledge; the understanding of how students with diverse needs at various
stages of human development and from different contexts construct knowledge, acquire skills and
develop habits and positive dispositions towards learning (Mishra and Koehler, 2006). Without
thorough grounding in pedagogical knowledge, teachers would lack the foundation that helps in
assessing student learning in respect to the teaching strategy being used and the possible modification
(Darling-Hammond, 2006). Unfortunately, much of the pedagogical knowledge exposure in most
education colleges is biased towards theory; the pedagogical knowledge curriculum is delinked from
the content knowledge curriculum. What is normally classified as foundations courses-philosophy,
psychology are taught as isolated entities and do not find grounding in the pedagogical knowledge
curriculum. Ideally, practical harmonization of the two curriculums is central.
2
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
One aspect of practical harmonization is providing teachers with opportunities to nurture their
pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). PCK is the understanding of what makes the learning of
specific topics easy or difficult from the learner’s perspective (Shulman, 1986). It enhances teacher’s
position to address learners’ difficulties, misconceptions and scaffold them to access content
knowledge (Mishra and Koehler, 2006). Additionally, PCK enables the teacher to teach subject-matter
not as separate themes but as consortium of interrelated concepts, resulting to conceptual and relational
understanding (Skemp, 1976). To facilitate nurturing of PCK the current shallow models of teaching
practice needs revision. Pre-service teachers need more practical opportunities in real classroom
situations.
As a way of consolidating fundamental-elements of Teacher-Education, there is need to
institutionalize school-based-internships and professional-development-schools concepts in teacher
education curriculum. Darling-Hammond (1998) articulates this exigency by asserting that “Teachers
learn best how to teach by studying, doing, and reflecting; by collaborating with other teachers; by
looking closely at students and their work; and by sharing what they see” (p.2). She further argues that
effective learning occurs more productively when student-teachers encounter questions in the context
of real students and get opportunities for research and inquiry; for trying, testing and evaluating the
results of teaching-and-learning. Therefore, school-based-internships provide prospective-teachers the
opportunity to generate connections between theories and practice of teaching-and-learning process
(Miller and Silvernail in Darling-Hammond, 1998) thereby increasing their effectiveness with students.
Additionally, through collaborative relationship with veteran teachers within the professionaldevelopment-schools concept, novice teachers benefit from rich experiences. Learning experiences in
professional development schools are useful for practice and ongoing theory building considering that a
3
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
professional teacher is one who learns from teaching rather than one who has finished learning how to
teach (Darling-Hammond, 1994).
Essential Auxiliaries
In traditional thinking, especially in developing countries, learning to teach is considered as a
terminal onetime event meant for pre-service teachers. This is a wrong perception. As rightly argued by
Cochran-Smith (2011) learning to teach never ends, in fact, it is no longer a one-time process of teacher
training where pre-service teachers are armed with theory and methods and then sent out to exercise
teaching. On the contrary, as a professional etiquette, the current emphasis is to have teachers engage in
lifelong learning. This is for the purpose of renegotiation and reconstruction for effective teaching (Bell
& Gilbert, 1996) and the fact that learning to teach takes place over time rather than at isolated
moments in time (Cochran-Smith, 2011). Additionally, lifelong learning may enhance teachers’ ability
of relating theory with practice, engaging in innovations and inventions necessary to bring about
meaningful teaching and learning, and subsequently contribute towards satisfaction in teaching career.
Even though there are clear policies in regard to institutionalization of pre-service teacher
education, most developing countries are yet to institutionalize in-service teacher education.
Consequently, there is the tendency to conduct in-service education haphazardly. The current exigency
for teachers to engage in lifelong learning requires a paradigm shift. Countries need to have in place in
frameworks for in-service education. Admittedly, this does not necessarily mean formulating a “onesize-fits-all” kind of in-service education to be adhered by all. Rather, customized in-service education
should be designed to address specific contextual needs. In support, Gaible and Mary (2005) cues is
that effective teacher professional development should begin first with an understanding of teachers’
needs and their work environments, i.e., schools and classrooms. For instance, currently there is
4
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
increasing demand for teachers to integrate Information Communication Technology (ICT) as a way of
enhancing the teaching-and-learning process. However, even though Mishra and Koehler (2006) have
formulated technological-pedagogical-content-knowledge (TPACK) as the ICT integration framework
they posit that quality teaching requires teachers to develop an understanding of the complex
relationships between technology, content, and pedagogy, and use this understanding to develop
appropriate context-specific teaching strategies. This implies that TPACK provides a generalized
solution but individual teachers have to customize it to address particular needs of their own classroom.
In addition to having in place lifelong learning that addresses contextual needs, and contrary to
what is considered normal practice, Cochran-Smith (2011) recommends continued teacher education
that transcends the stereotype process of periodic “staff development” where practicing teachers are
congregated into auditoriums to obtain latest updates about teaching methods. Rather, the paradigm
shift should be towards embedding in-service education in teachers’ daily work in the classroom. This
can be achieved through various ways such as lesson study which provides opportunities for extensive
interactions and sharing of individual experiences among communities of teachers to build stronger
shared professional basis of best practices (Olson, 2005), teacher inquiry where teachers direct their
own learning and focus on the particular needs of their own classroom (Poekert, 2011); the teacher
analyzes a particular dilemma, engages professional literature, experiments with new strategies, and
generates professional knowledge as a result of such experimentation (Cochran-Smith & Lytle 2009),
and reflective practice; the importance of reflective-practice and critical-inquiry skills for teachers is
emphasized by Hole and McEntree (1999) argument that ordinary occurrences during teaching-andlearning are entry points towards improving teaching. Reflecting on these ordinary occurrences creates
the foundation for assessing classroom situations and making rational instructional decisions that
5
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
eventually benefit learners.
Additionally, considering that “learning to teach is about raising questions and working with
others to generate local knowledge rather than simply receiving information from outside experts and
applying it the same way for every student in every context” (Cochran-Smith, 2011: 22), the concept
of professional development schools has a lot to offer. In professional development schools as veteran
practicing-teachers engage in various roles such as supervision and mentoring of student-teachers; coresearch work with universities; and collaboration with other teachers through joint reflections and
action-research, they deepen their knowledge about the teaching-and-learning process (DarlingHammond, 1998).
Contextual Implication
One peculiar misconception that has infiltrated our education system in Kenya is the common
understanding that the suitable qualification for secondary school teachers, primary school teachers,
and early childhood education teachers should be undergraduate teacher education, diploma teacher
education, and certificate teacher education respectively. Thus, the higher qualification a teacher
receives is considered as a ticket towards teaching at a higher level of schooling rather than mastery of
teaching in a certain level. This implies that teachers who acquire postgraduate teacher education
qualification seek teaching opportunities at universities and tertiary-colleges, but not in secondary,
primary or nursery schools. In my view, all levels of education are important and should have highest
professionally educated teachers.
Undoubtedly, teachers who have had thorough pre-service preparation and upon admission in
into the teaching profession engage in lifelong learning are more competent and successful with
students than those who do not. In view of this and considering the preceding discussion, the current
6
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
teacher education programmes concerning initial teacher-preparation and practicing teachers in Kenya
are in need of a paradigm shift. In their current state, pre-service teacher education-programmes
provide inadequate opportunities for student-teachers to relate theory with practice. Consequently,
teachers graduate from tertiary-institutions with more theory than practical know-how for contextual
application. Arguably, most of these graduates are unable to engage in effective teaching and
consequently learners suffer. As a remedy, teacher-education-programmes should have intensive-andextensive school-based internships linked to coursework. This will orient prospective-teachers with
intricacies of teaching-and-learning process and subsequently sharpen their effectiveness with students.
Indeed, as Darling-Hammond (2006) observes, without practice no amount of course work can singly
counteract the powerful experiential lessons that shape what teachers do. Much of the content taught to
student-teachers is delinked from official curriculum. Consequently, prospective teachers spend a lot of
time learning unnecessary-content at the expense of consolidating pedagogy, nurturing of pedagogicalcontent-knowledge, and acquisition of technological-pedagogical-content-knowledge. Thus, studentteachers encounter frustrations when they embark on actual teaching as novice teachers since they are
not well grounded in the content they are supposed to teach and appropriate instructional strategies.
The situation gets worse since mentoring programmes have not been institutionalized. This scenario
has escalated the problem of ineffective teachers and degraded the quality of education.
In Kenya the Ministry of Education is yet to put up a policy to govern in-service education. As
such most practicing teachers experience teacher professional development programmes with dilute
and decontextualized content, with insufficient inclusivity and limited diversity, and fail to meet the
aspirations of the teachers (Njoroge & Njiru, 2012). Notably, there are inadequate forums for
collaborative reflections and action-research on classroom teaching-and-learning and pertinent issues
7
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
like integration of Information-Communication-Technology. Therefore, teachers miss opportunities to
socially construct and share necessary knowledge that refines practice throughout their careers (Stigler
and Stevenson, 1991).
Conclusion
Deficiencies in teacher education programmes lower the quality of education and hinder
prospects of nurturing critical thinking and understanding learners. The foregoing discussion has
focused on aspects of effective teacher education programmes, for prospective and practicing teachers,
that ensures teaching remains a profession that inspire learners to superior achievements. Without
refocusing teacher education in East Africa, to integrate the elements discussed, learning to teach and
teaching will continue to annihilate the noble purpose of teaching; that of enhancing meaningful
learning which is critical for industrialization.
8
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
References
Agarkar, S. C., & Pradhan H. C. (2002). In-service Training of Mathematics Teachers in Ashram
schools. In Y. C. Cheng, K. T. Tsui, K. W. Chow & M. M. C. Mok (Eds.), Subject Teaching
and Teacher Education in the New Century: Research and Innovation (pp. 193-207). Hong
Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Ball, D., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W. R.
Houghston (Ed.), Handbook of research for teacher education (pp. 437-449). New
York: Macmillan.
Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996). Teacher Development: A model from Science Education. London:
Falmer Press.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2011). Does Learning to Teach Ever End? Laureates Speak. Kappa Delta, PI
Record. Retrieved May 29th, 2012, from
http://www.kdp.org/publications/pdf/record/Centennial/Cochran_Smith.pdf
Cochran-Smith, M. and Lytle, S.L., 2009. Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next
generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher
Education, 57(3), 300-313.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How Teacher Education Matters. Journal of Teacher Education,
51(3), 166-173.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher Learning that Supports Student Learning. Educational
Leadership Journal, 55(5), 6-11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Professional Development Schools: Schools for Developing a
Profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gaible, E. & Mary, B. (2005). Using Technology to Train Teachers: Appropriate Uses of ICT for
Teacher Professional Development in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: infoDev / World
Bank. Available at: http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html
Hole, S., & McEntree G. H. (1999). Reflection is at the heart of practice. Educational Leadership,
58(8), 34-37.
Larson, E. B., & Keiper, A. T. (2007). Instructional Strategies for Middle and High School.
London: Routledge.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating School Teachers. The Education Schools Project. Retrieved November
15, 2011, from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf
9
A paper presented during the 1st Annual International Interdisciplinary Conference, held at the
Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), June 27-31, 2012
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A
framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
Njoroge, J. M, & Njiru, S. N. (2012). Professional Development of Mathematics and Science Teachers:
Which way for Kenya? Unpublished paper presented in the International Conference on Educational
Reforms and Innovation in Enhancing Quality and Equity held on 20th and 21st February 2012 at
Kenyatta University, Kenya.
Novak, J. D., Mintzes, J. J., & Wandersee, J. H. (2000). Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A
Human Constructivist Perspective. In Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H. & Novak, J. D. (Eds.),
Assessing Science Understanding: A Human Constructivist View (pp. 1-13). London:
Academic Press.
Olson, J. (2005). Do teachers change their practices while participating in a lesson study? In P.
Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonagh, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.),
Building connections: Research theory and practice. (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference
of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne, pp. 593-600).
Sydney: MERGA
Poekert, P. (2011). The pedagogy of facilitation: teacher inquiry as professional development in a
Florida elementary school. Professional Development in Education, 37(1), 19-38.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in Teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics
teaching, 77, 20-26.
Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection.
American Educator, 15(1), 12-47.
10