Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
ApJ accepted: March 18, 2008 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 03/07/07 RESOLVING THE CHEMISTRY IN THE DISK OF TW HYDRAE I. DEUTERATED SPECIES Chunhua Qi1 , David J. Wilner1 , Yuri Aikawa2 , Geoffrey A. Blake3 , Michiel R. Hogerheijde4 arXiv:0803.2753v1 [astro-ph] 19 Mar 2008 ApJ accepted: March 18, 2008 ABSTRACT We present Submillimeter Array (SMA) observations of several deuterated species in the disk around the classical T Tauri star TW Hydrae at arcsecond scales, including detections of the DCN J=3–2 and DCO+ J=3–2 lines, and upper limits to the HDO 31,2 –22,1 , ortho-H2 D+ 11,0 –11,1 and para-D2 H+ 11,0 –10,1 transitions. We also present observations of the HCN J=3–2, HCO+ J=3–2 and H13 CO+ J=4–3 lines for comparison with their deuterated isotopologues. We constrain the radial and vertical distributions of various species in the disk by fitting the data using a model where the molecular emission from an irradiated accretion disk is sampled with a 2D Monte Carlo radiative transfer code. We find that the distribution of DCO+ differs markedly from that of HCO+ . The D/H ratios inferred change by at least one order of magnitude (0.01 to 0.1) for radii <30 AU to ≥70 AU and there is a rapid falloff of the abundance of DCO+ at radii larger than 90 AU. Using a simple analytical chemical model, we constrain the degree of ionization, x(e-)=n(e-)/n(H2 ), to be ∼ 10−7 in the disk layer(s) where these molecules are present. Provided the distribution of DCN follows that of HCN, the ratio of DCN to HCN is determined to be 1.7±0.5 × 10−2 ; however, this ratio is very sensitive to the poorly constrained vertical distribution of HCN. The resolved radial distribution of DCO+ indicates that in situ deuterium fractionation remains active within the TW Hydrae disk and must be considered in the molecular evolution of circumstellar accretion disks. Subject headings: circumstellar matter —comets: general —ISM: molecules —planetary systems: protoplanetary disks —stars: individual (TW Hydrae) —stars: pre-main-sequence 1. INTRODUCTION Millimeter-wave interferometers have imaged the gas and dust surrounding over a dozen T Tauri and Herbig Ae stars (see Dutrey et al. 2007 for a review). These studies demonstrate the potential to dramatically improve our understanding of disk physical and chemical structure, providing insights that will ultimately enable a more comprehensive understanding of star and planet formation. As analogs to the Solar Nebula, these circumstellar disks offer a unique opportunity to study the conditions during the planet formation process, especially the complex chemical evolution that must occur. In the outer parts of the disk directly accessible to millimeterwave interferometry, observations of deuterated species are particularly important because they can constrain the origin of primitive solar system bodies such as comets and other icy planetesimals. Deuterated molecule chemistry is sensitive to the temperature history of interstellar and circumstellar gas, as well as to density-sensitive processes such as molecular depletion in the cold (< 20 K) and dense (> 106 cm−3 ) disk midplane. The similarity of molecular D/H ratios between comets and high mass hot cores has been used to argue for an “interstellar” origin of cometary matter, but ambiguity remains and this argument is not se1 Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, MS 42, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; cqi@cfa.harvard.edu, dwilner@cfa.harvard.edu. 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan; aikawa@kobe-u.ac.jp. 3 Divisions of Geological & Planetary Sciences and Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, MS 150–21, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; gab@gps.caltech.edu. 4 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands; michiel@strw.leidenuniv.nl. cure (Bergin et al. 2007). Aikawa & Herbst (1999) investigate the chemistry of deuterium-bearing molecules in outer regions of protoplanetary disks and find that molecules formed in the disk have similar D/H ratios as those in comets. To date, the determination of D/H ratios in disks has been limited to the measurements of DCO+ /HCO+ in two classical T Tauri Stars (cTTs) with single dish telescopes (TW Hydrae, van Dishoeck et al. 2003; DM Tauri, Guilloteau et al. 2006), but DCO+ has not been observed in comets. Although H2 D+ and HDO lines have been detected in disks (Ceccarelli et al. 2004, 2005), there are no corresponding H+ 3 and H2 O observations that allow derivations of the D/H ratio. Therefore, direct measurements in disks of species observed in comets, such as DCN and HCN, will be important to help relate deuterium fractionation in disks to that in comets. Deuterated molecules in cold pre-stellar and protostellar cores are found to be enhanced by orders of magnitude over the elemental D/H abundance ratio of 1.5×10−5 through fractionation in the gas phase at low temperatures, an effect driven primarily by deuterated H+ 3 , which is formed by exchange reaction between H+ 3 and HD, then transfers its deuteron to neutral species. Theoretical models of disks (Aikawa et al. 2002; Willacy 2007) with realistic temperature and density structure show that the DCO+ /HCO+ ratio increases with radius due to the decreasing temperature moving out from the star. Spatially resolved data of deuterated molecules will help test disk physical models through these chemical consequences. The current capabilities of millimeter-wave observatories are limited both by sensitivity and by the small angular size of circumstellar disks, which makes spatially resolving the deuterium fractionation difficult. In this 2 work we take advantage of the proximity of the most nearby classical T Tauri star, TW Hydrae, which is surrounded by a disk of radius 3.′′ 5, or 200 AU at a distance of 56 pc (Qi et al. 2004), and a possible orbiting planet of mass (9.8±3.3) MJupiter at 0.04 AU (Setiawan et al. 2008), to study the physical and chemical structure of a protoplanetary environment at high spatial and spectral resolution using interferometry. The TW Hydrae disk is viewed nearly face-on, and so is well posed to investigate the radial distribution of molecular emission. Although the current angular resolution of ∼1–2′′ places only a few independent beams ( or ‘pixels’) across the disk, effectively improved resolution of the disk chemistry can be achieved thanks to the fact that the gas kinematics are essentially Keplerian. Beckwith & Sargent (1993) show that molecular line emission from Keplerian disks displays a “dipole” pattern near the systematic velocity due to the shear created by the orbital motion. The emission near the systemic velocity is dominated by the outer disk regions, and the separation of the emission peaks depends sensitively on the abundance gradient of the emitting species with radius. This important feature, commonly seen in velocity channel maps of disks with a range of inclination angles (even as small as 6–7 degrees in the case of TW Hydrae, Qi et al. 2004), may be used to study the radial distribution of molecular emission far more precisely than is afforded by the limited number of “pixels” provided by the available resolution. Here we report on Submillimeter Array (SMA)5 (Ho et al. 2004) observations of deuterated species in the disk around TW Hydrae, including the first detection and images of DCN and DCO+ . In §2 we describe the observations, while in §3 we introduce the analysis method used and the molecular distribution parameters derived. We describe the model fitting results and discuss the implications in §4, and we present a summary and conclusions in §5. 2. OBSERVATIONS All of the observations of TW Hydrae (R.A.: 11h 01m 51.s 875; Dec: -34◦ 42′ 17.′′ 155; J2000.0) were made between 2005 February and 2006 December using the SMA 8 antenna interferometer located atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the observational parameters for the detected and undetected species, respectively. The SMA receivers operate in a double-sideband (DSB) mode with an intermediate frequency band of 4–6 GHz which is sent over fiber optic transmission lines to 24 “overlapping” digital correlator “chunks” covering a 2 GHz spectral window. Two settings were used for observing the HCN/DCN and HCO+ /DCO+ lines: at 265.7–267.7 GHz (lower sideband) the tuning was centered on the HCN J=3–2 line at 265.8862 GHz in chunk S22 while the HCO+ J=3–2 line at 267.5576 GHz was simultaneously observed in chunk S02; at 215.4–217.4 GHz (lower sideband) the tuning was centered on the DCO+ J=3–2 line at 216.1126 GHz in chunk S16 while the DCN J=3–2 line at 217.2386 GHz was simultaneously observed in chunk S02 (the HDO 31,2 –22,1 line at 225.90 GHz was also covered in the USB 5 The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica. in chunk S06). Combinations of two array configurations (compact and extended) were used to obtain projected baselines ranging from 6 to 180 meters. Cryogenic SIS receivers on each antenna produced system temperatures (DSB) of 200-1400 K at 260 GHz and 100–200 K at 210 GHz. Observations of ortho-H2 D+ and H13 CO+ were simultaneously carried out (in the dual receiver observational mode) on 28 December 2006 using only the compact array configuration. Three out of eight antennas were equipped with 400 GHz receivers (DSB system temperature between 400 and 800 K) and were available for observations of the 372.4213 GHz ortho-H2 D+ 11,0 –11,1 line, and all eight antennas were operating with 345 GHz receivers (DSB system temperature between 150 and 300 K) for observations of the 346.9985 GHz H13 CO+ J=4–3 and 345.796 GHz CO J=3–2 lines. The correlator was configured with a narrow band of 512 channels over the 104 MHz chunk, which provided 0.2 MHz frequency resolution, or 0.28 km s−1 at 217 GHz, 0.23 km s−1 at 267 GHz and 0.16 km s−1 at 372 GHz. Observations of the 691.6604 GHz para-D2 H+ 11,0 –10,1 line were shared with observations of the CO J=6–5 line made on 17 February 2005 (details provided in Qi et al. 2006). Calibrations of the visibility phases and amplitudes were achieved with interleaved observations of the quasars J1037-295 and J1147-382, typically at intervals of 20-30 minutes. Observations of Callisto provided the absolute scale for the calibration of flux densities. The uncertainties in the flux scale are estimated to be 15%. All of the calibrations were done using the MIR software package 6 , while continuum and spectral line images were generated and CLEANed using MIRIAD. 3. SPECTRAL LINE MODELING Several model approaches have been developed to interpret interferometric molecular line and continuum observations from disks (Dutrey et al. 2007). In brief, the approach of Qi et al. (2004, 2006) works as follows: the kinetic temperature and density structure of the disk is determined by modeling the spectral energy distribution (SED) assuming well mixed gas and dust, with the results confirmed by the resolved (sub)mm continuum images. Then, a grid of models with a range of disk parameters including the outer radius Rout , the disk inclination i, position angle P.A. and the turbulent line width vturb are produced and a 2D accelerated Monte Carlo model (Hogerheijde & van der Tak 2000) is used to calculate the radiative transfer and molecular excitation. The collisional rates are taken from the Leiden Atomic and Molecular Database 7 (Schoier et al. 2005) for nonLTE line radiative transfer calculations. Specifically in the models used in this paper, the rate coefficients for HCO+ and DCO+ in collisions with H2 have been calculated by Flower (1999); the rate coefficients for HCN and DCN in collisions with H2 have been scaled from the rate of HCN-He calculated by Green & Thaddeus (1974). The model parameters are fitted using a χ2 analysis in the (u, v) plane. In the studies by Qi et al. (2004, 2006), the distribution of CO molecules was assumed to follow the H nuclei as derived from the dust density structure and a gas of solar 6 7 http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/∼cqi/mircook.html http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/∼moldata 3 TABLE 1 Observational Parameters for SMA TW Hydrae (detected species) Rest Frequency (GHz): Observations Antennas used Synthesized beam: Channel spacing (km s−1 ): R.M.S.a (Jy beam−1 ): Peak intensityb (Jy) a b c HCN 3–2 265.886 2005 Mar 04 2005 Apr 21 2005 April 26 7 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 PA -0.5◦ 0.23 0.35 4.7 HCO+ 3–2 267.558 2005 Mar 04 2005 Apr 21 2005 Apr 26 7 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 PA -6.3◦ 0.23 km 0.29 2.0 H13 CO+ 4- -3 346.999 2006 Dec 28 DCN 3–2c 217.239 2006 Apr 28 DCO+ 3–2 216.113 2006 Apr 28 2006 Feb 03 8 4.′′ 1 × 1.′′ 8 PA 3.3◦ 0.70 0.16 0.70 8 5.′′ 9 × 3.′′ 2 PA -1.5◦ 0.56 0.10 0.31 8 2.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 6 PA 2.8◦ 0.28 0.10 0.56 SNR limited by the dynamic range. Intensity averaged over the corresponding beam. Only compact configuration data used for DCN observation. TABLE 2 Observational Parameters for SMA TW Hydrae (undetected species) HDO 31,2 –22,1 225.897 2006 April 28 8 5.′′ 7 × 3.′′ 1 PA -0.6◦ 0.54 0.11 <2.0 × 1014 composition. However, molecules in disks do not necessarily share the same distribution as molecular hydrogen. Theoretical models (e.g. Aikawa et al. 1996; Aikawa & Nomura 2006) predict so-called three-layered structure; most molecules are photo-dissociated in the surface layer of the disk and frozen out in the mid-plane where most of hydrogen resides, with an abundance that peaks in the warm molecular layer at intermediate scale heights. To approximate this more complex behavior, we introduce new molecular distribution parameters for use in spectral line modeling. For first-order analysis in the radial molecular distributions, the column densities are assumed to vary as a power law as a function of radius: r )pi Σi (r) = Σi (10AU)( 10AU Here Σi and pi describe column density distribution of a specific species (i) rather than disk (hydrogen) column density. In most disk models to date, a single radial power-law is adopted for fitting the hydrogen or dust surface density. By assuming CO follows the distribution of hydrogen column density, Qi et al. (2004, 2006) also find satisfactory power-law fits for multiple CO transtions. When a single power law is insufficient for fitting the radial distribution, then a broken power law with two different indices will be used. To calculate the surface density at different radii, the vertical molecular distribution is needed, but this distribution may well vary with distance from the star. However, theoretical models (Aikawa & Nomura 2006) indicate that the vertical distribution of molecules at different radii is similar as a function of the hydrogen column density measured from the disk surface, Σ21 ≡ ΣH /(1.59 × 1021 cm−2 ), where the denominator is the conversion factor of the hydrogen column density to Av for the case of interstellar dust. As indicated by Figure o-H2 D+ 11,0 –11,1 372.421 2006 Dec 28 3 4.′′ 7 × 3.′′ 8 PA 14.5◦ 0.65 1.17 <1.7 × 1012 p-D2 H+ 11,0 –10,1 346.999 2005 Feb 17 4 3.′′ 3 × 1.′′ 3 PA 7.5◦ 0.35 7.39 <9.0 × 1014 102 Normalized Fraction Rest Frequency (GHz): Observations: Antenna used: Synthesized beam: Channel spacing (km s−1 ): R.M.S. (Jy beam−1 ): Nmolecule (1 σ) (cm−2 ): 100 10-2 10-4 10-6 10-8 0.001 σs 0.010 0.100 Σ21 σm 1.000 10.000 100.000 Fig. 1.— This schematic diagram shows an arbitrary molecular vertical distribution as a function of Σ21 measured from the disk surface at a certain radius. σm and σs are the midplane and surface boundary parameters for model fitting (see §3 of the text). 5 of Aikawa & Nomura (2006), the vertical distribution of molecular abundances shows a good correlation with Σ21 . Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of an arbitrary distribution of a molecule in disk where the x-axis shows Σ21 and the y-axis shows the normalized molecular fraction. Smaller Σ21 values (to the left of the plot) approach the surface of the disk, while larger Σ21 values (to the right) approach the midplane of the disk. For modeling, we make the further simplifying assumption that gaseous molecules exist with a constant abundance in layers between σs and σm , the surface and midplane boundaries of Σ21 , respectively, as indicated in Figure 1 by the shaded area. While the vertical distribution of molecules in disks may have a more complex distribution than assumed here, the adopted parameters provide a gross approximation to the vertical location where the species is most abundant. This is adequate for a first description, given the quality of the data available. For 4 4 0.6 HCO+ 3-2 DCO+ 3-2 0.4 Flux (Jy) Flux (Jy) 3 2 1 0.2 0.0 0 -0.2 -2 0 2 4 Velocity (km/s) 6 6 -2 8 HCN 3-2 2 4 Velocity (km/s) 6 8 DCN 3-2 0.3 4 0.2 Flux (Jy) Flux (Jy) 0 2 0.1 0.0 0 -0.1 -2 -2 0 2 4 Velocity (km/s) 6 8 -2 0 2 4 Velocity (km/s) 6 8 Fig. 2.— Top: The HCO+ , DCO+ , HCN and DCN J=3–2 spectra at the peak continuum (stellar) position. The fluxes of HCO+ and DCO+ are averaged over the beam of DCO+ J=3–2 (2.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 6 PA 2.8◦ ). The fluxes of HCN and DCN are averaged over the beam of DCN J=3–2 (5.′′ 9 × 3.′′ 2 PA -1.5◦ ). The vertical dotted lines indicate the positions of the fitted VLSR for each molecular transition except for DCN 3-2 where we adopt the VLSR from that of HCN J=3–2. Bottom: Velocity channel maps of the HCO+ , DCO+ , HCN and DCN J=3–2 emissions toward TW Hydrae. The angular resolutions are 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 at PA -6.3◦ for HCO+ J=3–2 and 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 at PA -0.5◦ for HCN J=3–2. The cross indicates the continuum (stellar) position. The axes are offsets from the pointing center in arcseconds. The 1σ contour steps are 0.4, 0.12, 0.35 and 0.09 Jy beam−1 for HCO+ , DCO+ , HCN and DCN J=3–2 respectively and the contours start at 2σ. example, the model of Aikawa & Nomura (2006) shows two vertical peaks of HCO+ , but the secondary peak is an order of magnitude smaller, and provides effectively negligible emission. Also, at least for the nearly face-on disk of TW Hydrae, the uncertainties in vertical distributions do not affect the derived radial distribution. This simple model captures the basic characteristics of three-layered structure predicted by theoretical models. Using the new distribution parameters: Σi (10AU) and pi (radial), σs and σm (vertical), the radial and vertical distributions of the molecules in disks can be constrained by observation. The best fit model is obtained by mini- mizing the χ2 , the weighted difference between the real and imaginary part of the complex visibility measured at the selected points of the (u, v) plane. The χ2 values are computed by the simultaneous fitting of channels covering LSR velocities from 1 to 4 km s−1 . Rout and pi are calculated on grids in steps of 5 (AU) and 0.2, respectively. log (σs ) and log (σm ) are calculated on grids in steps of 0.2 within the range from −2 to 2. Σi (10AU) and i are found with each pair of radial and vertical distribution parameters by minimizing χ2 . The systemic velocity VLSR is fit separately since it is not correlated with those distribution parameters. For each fit parameter, the 1σ 5 √ uncertainties are estimated as χ21σ = χ2m + 2n, where n is the number of degrees of freedom and χ2m is the χ2 value of best-fit model, as in Isella et al. (2007). We tested values for the turbulent velocity in the range from 0.0 to 0.15 km s−1 and found that exact value does not have a significant impact, in part because of the coarse spectral resolution of the data. Therefore, we fixed the turbulent velocity at an intermediate value, 0.08 km s−1 . 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 40 140 120 30 80 6 10 60 7 0 10 3 40 8 10 20 20 10 109 6 0 20 40 50 Z(AU) 100 7 10 10 8 0 4190 10 30 50 100 150 R(AU) 200 Fig. 3.— The solid and dotted contours show the temperature and density profiles from the TW Hya model of Calvet et al. (2002). The blue and red lines confine the locations of HCO+ and HCN in the model (see text). Figure 2 shows the spectra of HCO+ , DCO+ , HCN and DCN at the stellar (peak continuum) position and their velocity channel maps. Table 3 summarizes the power-law fitting results on HCO+ , DCO+ and HCN. The DCN and H13 CO+ lines are too weak for a χ2 analysis of their distribution parameters, and so only the ratios of DCN/HCN and HCO+ /H13 CO+ are fit. Figure 3 shows the density and temperature contours of the disk model (adopted from Calvet et al. 2002) and the locations of HCO+ and HCN derived from the model fitting procedure. Figure 4 shows the radial distribution of the molecular column densities of the best fit models for HCO+ , DCO+ and HCN. Not surprisingly, we found that the radial distributions are better constrained than the vertical ones: the local minimum of χ2 for different grids of vertical parameters are within the noise limit, i.e. the vertical parameters are the least well determined, due in part to the face-on nature of the TW Hydrae disk. We therefore treat the best-fit vertical results as fixed, and investigate the uncertainty of other parameters. 4.1. HCO+ and DCO+ The first detection of DCO+ in the disk around TW Hydrae was obtained by van Dishoeck et al. (2003) with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT), who reported a beam-averaged DCO+ /HCO+ abundance ratio of 0.035. Our spatially resolved observations of the DCO+ and HCO+ J=3–2 emission from the disk suggest a more complex chemical situation. Figure 5 shows the channel maps of HCO+ J=3–2, together with the best-fit model and the data-model residuals. Table 3 lists the best-fit model parameters. The χ2 surface for the radial power index pHCO+ and the outer radius Rout is shown in the top panel of Figure 6. The 1σ contour confines Rout to 200±10 AU and pHCO+ to −2.9±0.3. The H13 CO+ J=4–3 line was also detected, but the emission is not strong enough to constrain its distribution. Assuming that H13 CO+ has the same distribution as HCO+ , then fitting the ratio of HCO+ /H13 CO+ to match the intensity of the H13 CO+ emission indicates an HCO+ /H13 CO+ ratio of 100±25. This value is consistent with the nominal solar system value of 89. Figure 7 presents the best-fit model spectra of H13 CO+ J=4–3 overlayed on the SMA data. The vertical distribution of DCO+ is even less well constrained than that of HCO+ , and we choose to adopt the same values of σs and σm for both HCO+ and DCO+ (as indicated in Table 3). Because of the nearly face-on viewing geometry for the disk, the fitting of radial distribution power-law index pi is not affected significantly by the uncertainties in vertical structure, but only the value of Σi (10AU) needs to be adjusted. Examination of the channel maps shows upon inspection that the radial distributions of DCO+ and HCO+ are different. To demonstrate how differences in the radial distribution affect the resulting images, Figure 8 presents three models of DCO+ radial distribution and Figure 9 shows the corresponding simulated channel maps of the DCO+ J=3–2 line. Model 1 assumes that the DCO+ distribution follows the best-fit model of HCO+ . The minimum χ2 is determined to be 575396 and the corresponding DCO+ /HCO+ is found to be 4.7 × 10−2 . Comparing the simulated maps from Model 1 with the data in Figure 9 shows a distinct difference in that the double peaked nature of the central channel in the data is more obvious than in this model. The contrast of the contour levels between the central channel and the adjacent channels are also smaller in the data than in this model. Because the emission of the central channel mostly originates at large disk radii, these differences suggest that the DCO+ emission arising from the outer regions of the disk is stronger than predicted by this model. The slope of radial DCO+ distribution does not decrease as steeply as does HCO+ . In other words, the D/H ratio must increase with increasing radius. Model 2 shows the best-fit result for the radial distribution of DCO+ assuming a single power index. As shown in Figure 4, the radial distribution of DCO+ is strikingly different from that of HCO+ , with a positive power index of 2.4 and a smaller but better constrained Rout 90±5 AU. The contours of the iso-χ2 surface for DCO+ in the middle panel of Figure 6 indicate that the uncertainty of the radial power index is very large but that the index is still larger than 1.6 within the 1σ error, much larger than −2.9 found for HCO+ . The simulated DCO+ channel maps for Model 2 shown in Figure 9 are an improvement over Model 1 in matching the data. However in this model, Rout (∼ 90 AU) is much smaller than the disk radius observed with HCO+ and CO (∼ 200 AU) and DCO+ increases with radius but then disappears sharply at Rout ∼90 AU, as a step function, which is hard to understand. Comparison with the data shows that there are fewer complete contours around the double peaks in the central channel, which suggests that the DCO+ emission is maximum at an intermediate radius 6 1014 1.000 DCN/HCN=1.7±0.5×10-2 [DCO+]/[HCO+] Column Density [cm-2] HCO+/H13CO+=100±25 1013 0.100 [HCO+] [HCN]/10 1012 0.010 [DCO+] [DCO+]/[HCO+] 1011 10 0.001 100 R [AU] Fig. 4.— Radial distribution of molecular column densities and DCO+ /HCO+ ratio for the best-fit models for TW Hydrae. Solid lines depict single power-law fits, while the dashed lines are for DCO+ Model 3 where two power-law indices are used. TABLE 3 Fitting results Parameters Stellar Mass: M∗ (M⊙ ) Inclination: i(deg) Systemic velocity: VLSR (km s−1 ) Position angle: P.A.(deg) Turbulent line width: vturb (km s−1 ) Outer radius: Rout (AU) Column Density at 10AU: Σ(10AU) (cm−2 ) Radial power index: p Vertical Parameters: σs ,σm Minimum χ2 : Reduced χ2 : χ2r a DCO+ Model 2. b DCO+ Model 3, no error estimation. c DCO+ turning point at radius 70 AU. HCO+ 0.6 6.8±0.3 2.88±0.05 -27.4 0.08 200 ± 10 3.8 ±0.5 × 1015 -2.9 ± 0.3 0.1, 10 329588 1.21 rather than at the edge. For Model 3, instead of using a single power index (p) to fit for the radial distribution of DCO+ column density N(DCO+ ), the fit uses two power indices (p1 and p2) and a turning point (Rt ) where the power law index changes from p1 to p2, i.e. the location of the peak of N(DCO+ ). The parameters p1, p2 and Rt are searched within limited grids to minimize χ2 . In this model, N(DCO+ ) is found to increase with radius out to ∼ 70 AU, and then to decrease. Table 3 presents the best-fit parameters; no error estimation is provided due to the computation difficulties. Figure 9 shows the best-fit model images. Comparison of Model 3 with the data shows a visual improvement over Model 2 in the central channel, although the χ2 value of the two models are not distinguishable. We thus cannot clearly discriminate with the χ2 statistic if there is indeed a peak with radius for N(DCO+ ) as DCO+a 0.6 7.4±0.6 2.94±0.06 -27.4 0.08 90 ± 5 1.9±0.2 × 1010 2.4 ± 0.8 0.1, 10 575347 1.95 DCO+b 0.6 7.4 2.9 4 -27.4 0.08 160 4.8 × 106 7,-6 c 0.1,10 575347 1.95 HCN 0.6 6.6±0.8 2.73±0.06 -27.4 0.08 100 ± 10 2.4±0.4 × 1014 -1.0 ± 1.2 0.3, 30 297198 1.35 in Model 3, or if DCO+ increases with radius and disappears suddenly around 90 AU as in Model 2. Even with this ambiguity, however, both models imply that the D/H ratios change by at least an order of magnitude (0.01 to 0.1) from radii <30 AU to >70 AU and that there is a rapid falloff of N(DCO+ ) at radii larger than 90 AU. Because the emission in the central channel comes from the outer part of the disk (Keplerian rotation) projected along the line-of-sight with a very small inclination of around 7 degrees for TW Hydrae, the central velocity channel is most important for constraining the radial distribution. Based on the difference in the central velocity channel map between the models, we believe Model 3 is the more plausible description of the radial distribution of DCO+ . Figure 10 shows the channel maps of the DCO+ J=3–2 emission, together with those of Model 3 and the data-model residuals. 7 Fig. 5.— Top: Velocity channel maps of the HCO+ J=3–2 emission toward TW Hydrae. The angular resolution is 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 at PA -6.3◦ . The cross indicates the continuum (stellar) position. The axes are offsets from the pointing center in arcseconds. The 1σ contour step is 0.4 Jy beam−1 and the contours start at 2σ. Middle: channel map of the best-fit model with the same contour levels. Bottom: difference between the best-fit model and data on the same contour scale. Observations of deuterated molecular ions and the level of deuterium fractionation have been used to estimate the ionization degree in molecular clouds, and a similar analysis can be applied to circumstellar disks. If we consider only the ionization balance determined by HCO+ , H+ 3, DCO+ and electrons in steady state as shown in Equation 14 of Caselli (2002), the electron fractional abundance can be derived to be around 10−7 . Of course, this value is only valid in the intermediate layer where HCO+ is abundant and multiply deuterated H+ 3 is less abundant than HCO+ . Several important complications are also neglected in this analysis, including the presence of other atomic and molecular ions, neutral species besides CO which destroy H2 D+ , and negatively charged dust grains and refractory metals. Still, accurate measurements of DCO+ and HCO+ are the first steps toward an understanding of the ionization fraction in the disk. The increase of D/H ratios from inner to outer disk is generally consistent with the current theoretical models of the gas-deuterium fractionation processes that consider the effect of cold temperature. But the quick disappearance of DCO+ at radii beyond 90 AU (comparing with Rout around 200 AU for CO and HCO+ ) is puzzling, since DCO+ is expected to be abundant and observable in the cold outer region of the disk where HCO+ is still available. More theoretical work is needed to explain the disappearance of DCO+ in the outer part of the disk. 4.2. HCN and DCN Figure 11 shows the HCN J=3–2 channel maps, together with the best fit model and residuals. Table 3 lists the best-fit model parameters, and Figure 4 shows the radial distribution of column density derived. The χ2 surface shown in the bottom panel of Figure 6 indicates Rout 100±10 AU and pHCN −1.0±1.2. The radial power index is poorly constrained probably due to more complex distributions for HCN. A detailed comparison of the molecular distributions of HCN and CN will be presented elsewhere. Although the best fit vertical parameters seem to indicate that HCN (σm,HCN = 30) is found much deeper toward the midplane than is HCO+ (σm,HCO+ = 10), we emphasize that we are not able to accurately constrain the vertical distributions from the present data. This ambiguity strongly affects the column density of HCN (i.e. ΣHCN (10AU)) needed to fit the data (not the power index pHCN of radial distribution). A worse fit to the data (χ2 larger by 3σ over the best-fit model) can be obtained by assuming that the vertical distributions of HCN and HCO+ are the same, but the HCN column density is 1.5 times larger than that needed for the best fit model due to higher density near the midplane. The DCN J=3–2 transition is detected at a signal-tonoise ratio of 3 near the fitted HCN VLSR of 2.73 km s−1 (Figure 2). While this signal-to-noise ratio is not high, the significance of the detection is further supported by the channel maps (Figure 12 upper panel) where the velocity gradient along the disk position angle of ∼ −30◦ is consistent with that seen in CO J=2–1 and J=3–2 (Qi et al. 2004) and the other molecular lines presented in this paper. Since the DCN 3–2 emission is weak, we are not able to fit for the molecular distribution and so make the simplifying assumption that the distribution of DCN follows that of HCN. As with H13 CO+ , we fit the DCN/HCN ratio over the whole disk and determine the DCN/HCN ratio to be 1.7±0.5 × 10−2 . To again empha- 8 -2.0 H13CO+ 4-3 0.6 HCO -2.5 0.4 Flux (Jy) Radial Power Index + -3.0 -3.5 0.0 -4.0 -0.2 150 200 250 Outer Radius (AU) 300 -5 DCO+ 2 5 Velocity (km/s) 10 1013 1 0 -1 70 80 90 100 110 Outer Radius (AU) 120 Model 2 1012 1011 Model 1 Model 3 1010 109 2 HCN 1 100 R [AU] Fig. 8.— Models of DCO+ with different distributions of radial column densities. 0 -1 -2 -3 70 Column Density [cm-2] Radial Power Index 0 Fig. 7.— The beam-averaged H13 CO+ J=4–3 spectra at the continuum (ste llar) position. The SMA data are presented by the solid histogram, and the simulated model by the dashed histogram. The vertical dotted line indicates the position of the fitted VLSR for HCO+ J=3–2. 3 Radial Power Index 0.2 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 Outer Radius (AU) Fig. 6.— Iso-χ2 surfaces of (Rout ,pi ) for HCO+ , DCO+ (as in Model 2) and HCN. Contours correspond to the 1 to 6 σ errors. For DCO+ , the index values larger than 3 at around 90 AU indicate the ratios of DCO+ /HCO+ larger than 1, so the χ2 surface is not calculated beyond that. size the impact of the assumed vertical distribution on the derived column densities, the DCN/HCN ratio could be as high as 5 × 10−2 if HCN and DCN are distributed vertically over the same region as is HCO+ . Highly fractionated DCN/HCN ratios have been measured in comets. In the coma of comet Hale-Bopp, for example, Meier et al. (1998) reported the ratio to be around 2.3 × 10−3 , but higher DCN/HCN ratios – (D/H)HCN,jet ≈0.025 are detected from the pristine material sublimed from icy grains ejected in jets from the nucleus which may present a more representative sampling of cometary ices that have not experienced significant thermal processing (Blake et al. 1999). Such ratios are consistent with those found here in the TW Hydrae disk, indicating that high D/H ratios in comets could originate from material in the outer regions of disks where in situ deuterium fractionation is ongoing, rather than requiring an inheritance from interstellar material. 4.3. Upper limits for H2 D+ , D2 H+ and HDO In the disk midplane, H2 is expected to be gaseous and the molecular ion formed by the cosmic ray ionization of H2 , H+ 3 , is expected to be the most abundant ion. Unfortunately, H+ 3 is only detectable in cold gas via infrared absorption. In its deuterated forms, however, H2 D+ and even D2 H+ are expected to be abundant in the cold, dense gas (Ceccarelli & Dominik 2005). The ground-state transition of ortho-H2 D+ was first detected in a young stellar object (NGC 1333 IRAS 4A) 9 Fig. 9.— DCO+ J=3–2 channel maps toward TW Hydrae and the simulated model distributions depicted in Figure 8. by Stark et al. (1999) and in a prestellar core (L1544) by Caselli et al. (2003). Both H2 D+ and D2 H+ have been detected toward another pre-stellar core 16293E via their ground-state submm rotational lines (Vastel et al. 2004). The inclusion of multiply deuterated H+ 3 in chemical models leads to predictions of higher values of the D/H ratio in cold, high-density regions of the interstellar medium. Similarly, in the dense, cold disk midplane, CO is depleted, and high abundances of H2 D+ and D2 H+ are expected. For this reason, Ceccarelli et al. (2004) searched for the ground-state transition of ortho-H2 D+ with the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO), and reported 3.2σ and 4.7σ detections toward TW Hydrae and DM Tauri, respectively. With the 400 GHz and 690 GHz receiver-equipped SMA antennas, we searched for the 372 GHz ortho-H2 D+ 11,1 –11,0 and 690 GHz paraD2 H+ 110 –101 lines toward TW Hydrae. No significant emission signals were detected. Here we discuss the upper limits and their implications. Our 3-antenna SMA observations give a 1σ upper limit for the ortho-H2 D+ 11,1 –11,0 line emission of 1.2 Jy beam−1 km s−1 with a 4.′′ 7 × 3.′′ 8 synthesized beam. To compare the result with single dish data, the extent of the source emission must be known. Since H2 D+ was observed along with the H13 CO+ 4–3 line in a dualreceiver observation on 28 December 2006 and H13 CO+ 4–3 has been clearly detected at JCMT (van Dishoeck et al. 2003), we can compare the intensities of these two lines between the SMA data and the single dish observations to constrain the emitting areas. The H13 CO+ 4–3 line was detected at JCMT with an integrated intensity of 0.07 K km s−1 in a 13′′ beam (van Dishoeck et al. 2003); while for the SMA the integrated intensity of this line is determined to be 0.61 Jy beam−1 km s−1 with a beam of 4.′′ 1 × 1.′′ 8. If the extent of the emission of H13 CO+ is similar to that of H2 D+ , our interferometric upper limit of Jy beam−1 km s−1 for H2 D+ (considering the small change of the beam sizes) becomes 0.09 K km s−1 (1σ) or 0.27 K km s−1 (3 σ) upper limits, which is consistent with 2σ upper limits of about 0.2 K km s−1 by the JCMT (Thi et al. 2004) but slightly lower than the 3.2σ detection of 0.39 K km s−1 by Ceccarelli et al. (2004). We estimate the 1σ upper limit of the ortho-H2 D+ column density to be 1.7 × 1012 cm−2 according to the Equation 4 of Vastel et al. (2004), which is slightly less than the 2σ upper limit estimate of 4.4 × 1012 cm−2 by Thi et al. (2004) since the SMA data had a smaller noise level. Of course this analysis assumes the extent of H2 D+ is similar to that of H13 CO+ . With the deployment of more 400 GHz receivers on the SMA and further H2 D+ observations, it should be possible to provide rather better constraints on the H2 D+ abundance 10 Fig. 10.— Top: Velocity channel map of the DCO+ J=3–2 toward TW Hydrae. The angular resolution is 2.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 6 at PA 2.8◦ . The cross indicates the continuum (stellar) position. The axes are offsets from the pointing center in arcseconds. The 1σ contour step is 0.12 Jy beam−1 and the contours start at 2σ. Middle: channel map of Model 3 with the same contour levels. Bottom: difference between Model 3 and data on the same contour scale. Fig. 11.— Top: Velocity channel map of the HCN J=3–2 toward TW Hydrae. The angular resolution is 1.′′ 6 × 1.′′ 1 at PA -0.5◦ . The cross indicates the continuum (stellar) position. The axes are offsets from the pointing center in arcseconds. The 1σ contour step is 0.35 Jy beam−1 and the contours start at 2σ. Middle: channel map of the best-fit model with the same contour levels. Bottom: difference between the best-fit model and data on the same contour scale. 11 0.3 DCN 3-2 Flux (Jy) 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -5 0 5 Velocity (km/s) 10 Fig. 12.— Top left: DCN J=3–2 velocity channel maps (red: 2.84 km s−1 , blue: 2.28 km s−1 ) from TW Hydrae, overlaid on the 217 GHz dust continuum map (gray scale). The cross indicates the position of the continuum peak. Top right: the simulated model for DCN J=3–2. The 1σ contour step is 0.09 Jy beam−1 and the contours start with 2σ. Bottom: the beam-averaged DCN 3–2 spectra at the continuum (stellar) position. The SMA data are presented by the solid histogram, and the simulated model by the dashed histogram. The vertical dotted line indicates the position of the fitted VLSR for HCN J=3–2. 12 in the disk. We estimate the 1σ upper limit for para-D2 H+ 110 –101 to be 5.35 Jy beam−1 km s−1 with a beam of 3.′′ 3 × 1.′′ 3. The 1σ upper limit to the para-D2 H+ column density is estimated to be 9.0 × 1014 cm−2 . This is less constrained than H2 D+ due to the relatively poor system sensitivity at 690 GHz. For HDO 31,2 –22,1 , the 1σ upper limit is 0.10 Jy beam−1 km s−1 . Assuming an excitation temperature of 30 K, the upper limit for the HDO column density is 2.0 × 1014 cm−2 . Since the lower state energy level of this line is nearly 160 K, it must originate from warm regions of the disk which are quite distinct from the cold layers where HDO ground state transition absorption, as found in DM Tauri (Ceccarelli et al. 2005), must arise – although we note that the detection of the HDO absorption line in DM Tauri has been disputed by Guilloteau et al. (2006). 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Observations of deuterated species in circumstellar disks are important to understand the origin of primitive solar system bodies in that they can directly constrain the deuterium fractionation in the outer regions where cometary ices are likely formed. Spatially resolved observations of the D/H ratios in disks enable the comparison of the fractionation measured in comets such as HaleBopp (Blake et al. 1999) with the specific conditions at each disk radius. We have presented the first images of DCO+ and DCN emission from the disk around a classical T Tauri star, TW Hydrae, along with images of the HCN and HCO+ J=3–2 lines. The observations of deuterium fractionation serve as a clear measure of the importance of low-temperature gas-phase deuterium fractionation processes. These observations strongly support the proposed link among high gas densities, cold temperature and enhanced deuterium fractionation. De- tailed chemical models are still needed to explain how DCO+ disappears from the outer part of the disk. The similarity of the D/H ratios in cold clouds, disks and pristine cometary material has been used to argue that the gas spends most of its lifetime at low temperatures and is incorporated into the disks before the envelope is heated, i.e. before the Class I stage. By combining self-consistent physical models and 2D radiative transfer codes to interpret high spatial resolution millimeter-wave molecular images, we are only now beginning to investigate the radial and vertical distributions of molecules in disks. The radial distribution of DCO+ in the disk of TW Hydrae indicates that in situ deuterium fractionation is ongoing. The molecular evolution within disks must therefore be considered in the investigation of the origin of primitive solar system bodies. We have obtained less stringent constraints on the vertical distributions of molecules in the disk of TW Hydrae. To address the ambiguity present in the analysis of single objects, data from a robust sample of disks is needed, in particular one that covers a range of disk inclinations. More sensitive observations are also needed for the rare isotopologues H13 CN, H13 CO+ and, of course, DCN, to understand the radial and vertical gradient of deuterated species in these disks. In the future, observations of DCN and other species with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array will provide further insight into the chemical state of protoplanetary disks. Partial support for this work comes from NASA Origins of Solar Systems Grant NNG05GI81G. M.R.H is supported by a VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. C.Q. acknowledges Paola Caselli for her help and useful suggestions. We thank the referee for very useful comments. REFERENCES Aikawa, Y. & Herbst, E. 1999, ApJ, 526, 314 Aikawa, Y., Miyama, S. M., Nakano, T., & Umebayashi, T. 1996, ApJ, 467, 684 Aikawa, Y. & Nomura, H. 2006, ApJ, 642, 1152 Aikawa, Y., van Zadelhoff, G. J., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Herbst, E. 2002, A&A, 386, 622 Beckwith, S. V. W. & Sargent, A. I. 1993, ApJ, 402, 280 Bergin, E. A., Aikawa, Y., Blake, G. A., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 751–766 Blake, G. A., Qi, C., Hogerheijde, M. R., Gurwell, M. A., & Muhleman, D. O. 1999, Nature, 398, 213 Calvet, N., D’Alessio, P., Hartmann, L., Wilner, D., Walsh, A., & Sitko, M. 2002, ApJ, 568, 1008 Caselli, P. 2002, Planet. Space Sci., 50, 1133 Caselli, P., van der Tak, F. F. S., Ceccarelli, C., & Bacmann, A. 2003, A&A, 403, L37 Ceccarelli, C. & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 440, 583 Ceccarelli, C., Dominik, C., Caux, E., Lefloch, B., & Caselli, P. 2005, ApJ, 631, L81 Ceccarelli, C., Dominik, C., Lefloch, B., Caselli, P., & Caux, E. 2004, ApJ, 607, L51 Dutrey, A., Guilloteau, S., & Ho, P. 2007, in Protostars and Planets V, ed. B. Reipurth, D. Jewitt, & K. Keil, 495–506 Flower, D. R. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 651 Green, S., & Thaddeus, P. 1974, ApJ, 191, 653 Guilloteau, S., Piétu, V., Dutrey, A., & Guélin, M. 2006, A&A, 448, L5 Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., & Lo, K. Y. 2004, ApJ, 616, L1 Hogerheijde, M. R. & van der Tak, F. F. S. 2000, A&A, 362, 697 Isella, A., Testi, L., Natta, A., Neri, R., Wilner, D., & Qi, C. 2007, A&A, 469, 213 Meier, R., Owen, T. C., Jewitt, D. C., Matthews, H. E., Senay, M., Biver, N., Bockelee-Morvan, D., Crovisier, J., & Gautier, D. 1998, Science, 279, 1707 Qi, C., Ho, P. T. P., Wilner, D. J., Takakuwa, S., Hirano, N., Ohashi, N., Bourke, T. L., Zhang, Q., Blake, G. A., Hogerheijde, M., Saito, M., Choi, M., & Yang, J. 2004, ApJ, 616, L11 Qi, C., Wilner, D. J., Calvet, N., Bourke, T. L., Blake, G. A., Hogerheijde, M. R., Ho, P. T. P., & Bergin, E. 2006, ApJ, 636, L157 Schöier, F. L., van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2005, A&A, 432, 369 Setiawan, J., Henning, T., Launhardt, R., Müller, A., Weise, P., & M., K. 2008, Nature, 451, 38 Stark, R., van der Tak, F. F. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1999, ApJ, 521, L67 Thi, W.-F., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2004, A&A, 425, 955 van Dishoeck, E. F., Thi, W.-F., & van Zadelhoff, G.-J. 2003, A&A, 400, L1 Vastel, C., Phillips, T. G., & Yoshida, H. 2004, ApJ, 606, L127 Willacy, K. 2007, ApJ, 660, 441