In defence of instrumentality

Abstract: The discussion of the so called „instrumentalisation ‟ of cultural institutions and programmes has been a key focus for the cultural policy, museum and heritage studies literatures over the part few years. This article will challenge the historical accuracy of claims that „instrumentality ‟ is a recent „threat ‟ to the management and funding of culture. Rather I will argue that historically, instrumental cultural policies have been policies of production. Further, through an analysis of the terms of the „instrumentalisation debate ‟ in relation to museums I will show that there is no consensus in the understanding of what constitutes instrumental or intrinsic functions. The „instrumental /intrinsic ‟ dichotomy is too simplistic to allow grounded critical engagement with the real complexities of cultural institutions and programmes. Finally, I argue that in order to work critically with institutions, policies and programmes it is necessary to engage with the practicalities ...