A case study on determinants of human resource practices influencing retention of
employees in Kedah State Development Corporation, Malaysia
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar
Associate Professor-COB
Universiti of Utara, Sintok,
Malaysia:0060
Ms.Wang wei
Masters in Human Resource Management
College of Business
Universiti of Utara, Sintok,
Malaysia: 0060
Abstract
In order to succeed and prosper in the intensive competitive environment; organizations need to
maintain a competitive labor force and try to stimulate them to perform well. Organizations holding
effective labor force have a better chance to win in the business. In modern business, many
organizations are bearing employees’ turnover loss, they spend more money to recruit new people and
provide training to them. For employers, knowing how to maintain employees to stay in the
organization is wiser than to prevent them from quitting jobs. For the retention is a proactive action to
keep good workforce, while preventing employee turnover is a reactive action to avoid loss.
This research will explore the influence of the 5 factors (compensation, work-life balance,
organizational commitment, career opportunity and supervisor support) on employees’ intention to
stay in the Kedah State Development Corporation Company, what are the possible attractive factors
for them to stay there. This study will combine both theoretical and empirical research, trying to find
factors that affect employees’ retention decision. These factors can be used as options for other
organizations. So other organizations may take these factors into consideration when they want to
keep their labor force and maintain effective employees for the organization. This research will
investigate the main factor which causes employee retention in KSDC and why employees are
preferred to stay in the KSDC.
Key words: Competitive environment, compensation, work-life balance, organizational commitment
42 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
1.
INTRODUCTION
The organization's success and prosper cannot be realized without support and contribution from its
employees. From modern human resource perspective, human capital is the most valuable assets for
the organizations (Mello, 2011). Human assets are difficult to duplicate, so they become the key
competitive advantage for an organization in the intensive competition. Clearly, finding and hiring the
right employees are initial to the establishment of organization, but maintaining the effective
workforce will be more important for the organization’s development (Schuler & Jackson, 1987).
Employee is a person who has agreed to provide service for employer in exchange for money (legal
dictionary, 2010). That means employees work for the employers to make contribution to the
production, sales and service, at the same time employers pay employee in terms of money for their
efforts contributed to the organization. Employees and employers are inter-depended on each other.
Employees work for employers to earn salary, and employers need employees to get work done, by
such way to make profit for the organization.
Many researchers studied on the topic of employees turnover (Khatri & Chong, 2001; Min, 2007; Lee,
Chen), and they come up with the reasons why employees quit their job and choose another company
or organization to work for, the fact such as unsatisfied pay, limited career development, work life
conflict, change of residential and many other reasons lead an employee to resign from the
organization. As the result, job-hopping becomes a serious and costly phenomenon in the labor
market, when employees change from one job to other regardless better alternatives or other
apparently “rational” motives. It may result from individual employee’s characteristic such as itch of
impulsiveness or social influences such as turnover culture (Khatri & Chong, 2001). Doing business in
such situation, employers need to avoid the above factors leading to employee turnover to avoid
losses. At the same time, it is necessary to focus on the other group of employees who choose to stay
in the organization and to learn and analyze why employees want to stay in the organization, so
employers can promote such situations and factors to retain talent employees and reduced employee
turnover rate. Because trying to prevent employees’ turnover is a reactive action, but trying to
maintaining effective workforce is a proactive method for the employers in the business.
1.1 Problem Statement
Many companies have put money and energy in the training and development to their employees
(Cappelli, 1999), they put more added-value to their employees, but this brings the employer with
new problems: employees with better skill and knowledge change their job more active than before. If
employers want to get investment return from the employees, the first question is how to retain their
employees. If organizations want to survive in this intensive business environment, they need the full
contribution from their employees; the first question is how to retain their employees, not to join
their competitors’ organization. If organizations want to get healthy and steady profit growth, they
also need their employee to work hard together to reach the goal; the question is to make sure the
43 | P a g e
International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume -2, No.-2, 2012
organization has an effective workforce, employees are preferred to stay in the organization.
Therefore, the research problem carried out in this study is to observe the impact of 5 HRM practices
(compensation, work life balance, organizational commitment, and career opportunities and
supervisor support) and employees’ intention to stay in Kedah State Development Corporation
Company (KSDC). This research will investigate the main factor which causes employee retention in
KSDC and why employees are preferred to stay in the KSDC.
1.2 Research Objectives
1. To examine the relationship between compensation and employee intention to stay.
2. To examine the relationship between work life balance and employee intention to stay
3. To examine the relationship between organizational commitment and employee intention to
stay.
4. To examine the relationship between career opportunities and employee intention to stay.
5. To examine the relationship between supervisor support and employee intention to stay.
6. To examine the most important determinant of HR practices (compensation, work life balance,
organizational commitment, career opportunities and supervisor support) that related employee
intention to stay.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Intention to Stay
In the human resource management domain, the term “employee turnover” has been studied for
many years. But with the development of the society, starting from mid-1990s, researchers not only
study why employees leave the organization but also investigating the factors to successfully
influencing employees to stay and the benefit organizations gain with successful employee maintain
(Ramlall, 2004).
Compensation
Many studies have point out the impact of employee compensation, rewards and employee relation
on turnover and retention (Becker & Huselid, 1999; Cho et al., 2006; Guthrie, 2001; Huselid, 1995;
Milman, 2003; Milman & Ricci, 2004; Shaw et al., 1998; Walsh & Taylor, 2007). They found that
effective compensation systems can promote employees’ commitment to organization; improve
productivity and employees’ willing to stay in the organization.
Financial Rewards
Financial reward is the main reason employees work for the organization. They sell their time, energy,
intelligence in order to exchange the financial rewards, and continue their life. Financial rewards are
frequently adopted by companies to keep employees (Farris, 2000). Financial rewards can be the
reason for employees to work, and it promotes positive employee behavior, and the same time,
financial rewards is the first factors for money-orientated people to take into consideration.
44 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
Benefit Package
Employee benefits and benefits in kind (fringe benefits, perquisites, and perks) are various non-wage
compensations provided to employees beside on their money payment or wages (Farris, 2000). The
benefit package works as a value-added compensation to employees, and they will feel that they are
appreciated by the organizations.
Work Life Balance
With the development of human society, the traditional roles for husband and wife become less
specified than before. In the recent 1960’s and 1970’s, there is significant increase in the number of
women employee joining in the labor force, companied with the single parent homes. This blurred
the traditional gender roles that who is responsible for the money matters and who is responsible for
the family matters. Now both of the parents have to make money and at the same time to take care
of all the family matters (Quick et al., 2004; Greenblatt, 2002).
Organizational Commitment
Organizational commitment is extend to which employees recognize their organization that they will
make contribution for the development (Coleman, Irving, & Cooper, 2006) Booth, Burton and
Mumford (2005) pointed that commitment is a process of recognition. When an individual commits to
an organization, he trusts and follows the organization’s objective, principles and mission, and he will
more willing to stay in the organization.
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Framework
Independent Variables
Dependent Variable
Compensation
Work-life Balance
Organizational Commitment
Employees’ intention to stay
Career commitment
Supervisor support
Figure 1: Research Framework
45 | P a g e
International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume -2, No.-2, 2012
3.2 Research Hypothesis
Based on research framework there are five hypotheses which are as follows:
H1 - There is a positive relationship between the compensation and employee’s intention to stay.
H1 - There is a positive relationship between the compensation and employee’s intention to stay.
H3 - There is a positive relationship between the organizational commitment and employee’s
intention to stay.
H4 - There is a positive relationship between the career opportunity and employee’s intention to stay.
H5 - There is a positive relationship between the supervisor support and employee’s intention to stay.
3.3 Research Design
Descriptive research design is used in this research. The main goal of this type of research is to
describe the data and characteristics about what is being studied.
3.4 Sampling
In this study, researcher adopted the convenience sampling technique. Convenience sampling
(sometimes known as grab or opportunity sampling) is a type of non-probability sampling which
involves the sample being drawn from that part of the population which is close to hand.
Population and Sampling
The sampling frame for this study includes all employees at KSDC Company. Based on the information
given by the HR Department, there are about 120 employees working at the company. According t the
sample determination table developed by Sekranan (2003), the appropriate ample size for population
120 is 92(92 sets of questionnaire were distributed to KSDC Company. The sample size chosen for this
study is 92 employees in KSDC Company. It was considered adequate to represent the total population
of KSDC Company.
3.5 Method of Data collection
The most popular data collection techniques include: surveys, secondary data sources or archival data,
objective measures or tests, and interviews. In this study questionnaires are used. Company
background information is obtained from the KSDC Company online web, annual report, and
magazines. Questionnaire method is to collect data through the questionnaires. Researchers list the
relevant questions and ask respondents to answer them according to their personal situation.
Questionnaires have the comparing advantage such as: it is easy to analyze, familiar to most people, it
can reduce bias and less intrusive than face-to-face surveys.
46 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
3.6 Data Analysis
Technique of Analysis
Various statistical methods will be used to analyze the data collected from respondents. In this study,
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SP 16.0) will be used for the data analysis. Correlation
Analysis, ANOVA, t-Test, were used in analysis.
4. FINDINGS
Reliability Test
The reliability tests were employed to test the initial consistency of the study. The measurement is
employed to make sure the developed factors will measure consistently the items intended to be
measured. As revealed, the reliability coefficient of the study variable exceeded the minimum
acceptable level of 0.60 (Nunnally, 1978). As a result, Cronbach’s alpha for the intention to stay is
0.704, for compensation is 0.80, for work-life balance is 0.785, for organizational commitment is 0.789,
for career opportunity is 0.829 and finally for supervisor support is 0.838.
Table: 1 Reliability Coefficient of the Study Variables
Variable
Total items
No. of deleted
Alpha Coefficient
Retention intention
5
None
0.704
Compensation
11
None
0.80
Work-life balance
8
None
0.785
Organizational commitment
7
None
0.789
Career opportunity
7
None
0.829
Supervisor support
6
None
0.838
Correlation Analysis
The Pearson correlation is used to measure the significance of linear bivariate between the
independent and dependent variables in the study (Sekaran, 2003). Perfect positive correlation (r)
would be said between two variable when it is represented by 1.0 (positive 1) while perfect negative
correlation if -1.0 (negative 1). Significance between two variable need to be known where if p = 0.05,
it indicated that 95 times out of 100 is a significant correlation and only 5% chance that the
relationship is not truly exist. Table above shows the relationship between employees’ retention
intention and the 5 variables. The result indicate that there is a significant relationship between
47 | P a g e
International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume -2, No.-2, 2012
compensation and retention intention (r = 0.744, n = 92, p <0.001). The overall variables (including
compensation, work-life balance, organizational commitment, career opportunity and supervisor
support) have a correlation with retention intention (r = 0.553, n = 92, p < 0.001), and is followed by
career opportunity (r = 0.533, n = 92, p < 0.001). The investigation shows that there is similar
correlation in terms of retention with supervisor support (r = 0.396, n = 92, p < 0.001) and work-life
balance (r= = 0.389, n = 92, p < 0.001). Finally, compared with other variables, there is a less strong
correlation between variable organizational commitment and retention intention in KSDC Company
employees (r=0.312, n=92, p < 0.00).
Table: 2 Correlations between Variables
Variables
N
1
2
3
4
5
6
1. Intention to Stay
92
2. Compensation
92
.744**
3. Work-life Balance
92
.389**
.389**
92
.312**
.298**
.001**
5. Career opportunity
92
.533**
.431**
.365**
.385**
6. Supervisor support
92
.396**
.295**
.034**
.513**
.429**
7. Overall factors
92
.533**
.577**
.220**
.355**
.368**
4. Organizational
commitment
.723**
Analysis of Differences
The analysis of T-test and ANOVA were used in this study. T-test was used to find the differences
between male and female employees in terms of their intention to stay. While the ANOVA was used to
find the differences between age, length of service, education background and position in terms of
KSDC Company employees’ retention intention. As there is only one race (Malay) in the KSDC
Company, the researcher cannot find the difference between the different race groups retention
(Although there are three major race groups in Malaysia – Malay, Chinese and Indian).
5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Compensation and Intention to Stay
The compensation is found as the most significant positive factor to influence employees’ intention to
stay in the KSDC Company. As a government company, KSDC Company can provide their employees
48 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
with competitive compensation package, and the related bonus. At the same time, the information
regarding how employees are paid is clear to the employees together with the consistent
compensation policy. The results obtained in the study are supported by Jason, D. S. (2010) study,
which he concludes compensation is the factor which never can be deleted as a means to retain
employees. Employees with higher levels of pay satisfaction will less likely to leave the organization.
Work-life Balance and Intention to Stay
According to the results, work-life balance is positive correlated with employees’ intention to stay in
the KSDC Company. In government sector, work are more stable and there are less competition than
in the private sector, the company can make positive policy to improve help employees in balancing
their work and family issues. In KSDC Company employees do not troubled by the work-life conflict,
they are provided with reasonable work assignment and pleasant working schedule, by such way they
can balance the work and family issue.
Organizational Commitment and Intention to Stay
Organizational commitment is found to have positive correlation to the employees’ retention
intention. It showed that KSDC Company employees are willingly to stay in the company because they
have developed the commitment to the organization. The longer service year is the higher
organization commitment will be.
Career Opportunity and Intention to Stay
Career opportunity is positively related to employees’ intention to stay in KSDC Company. The
company gives more opportunity to the internal employees than the outsiders. Most employees are
agreed that their career opportunity in KSDC Company is good and the organization value employees’
career development, which can provide them with clear career path. But there was less half
employees (43.6%) regard it is easy to find job in other department. The majority think the chance to
apply job in other department was difficult. It may due to the characteristic of the job itself.
6. RECOMMENDATION
This study was carried out in order to find the relationship between several retention factors and
employees intention to stay in the KSDC Company. However the future study, it is suggest that
employees from variable sectors and more companies are encouraged to be involved. More
employees should be analyzed to investigate their intention to stay (or to leave) in the organization.
More variable should be considered to explain the retention intention, such as job itself, working
environment, employees’ relationship with coworkers. The result conducted from the private sector
cannot predict the private sector well, so the inter-industry research is suggested, and whether there
is difference or similarity in the different sectors.
49 | P a g e
International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume -2, No.-2, 2012
7. CONCLUSION
This study is conducted to find the relationship between retention factors and employees’ intention to
stay in the KSDC Company. It has been revealed that all the retention factors have positive relationship
with employees’ intention to stay. They are supported by most of the previous studies. From the
analysis compensation has the greatest influence employees’ retention intention. So other companies
can improve their employee retention effectiveness by provide employees’ with effective
compensation package.
Reference
Aaron-Corbin, C. 1999, The multiple-Role Balancing Act. Management Review, October, p. 62.
Abbasi, S. M., & Hollman, K. W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management,
29(3), 333–343.
Atul, M., Nina, G & Jason, D. S. (2010) A Comparative Examination of Graditional and Skill-based Pay
Plans. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4).
Bergmann, T.J. and Scarpello, V. (2002), Compensation Decision Making, 4th ed., Southwestern,
Mason, OH.
Broers, C. M. (2005). Career and Family: The Role of Social Support, Unpublished PhD Thesis, Brisbane,
Griffith University.
Brown, R., & Yoshioka, B. (2003). Organizational commitment: Clarifying the concept and simplifying
the existing construct typology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 230–251.
Chew, J. and Chan, C.A. (2007), Human Resource Practices, Organizational Commitment and Intention
to Stay. International Journal of Manpower, 29(6), 503-522
Cho, S., Woods, R., Jang, S. and Erdem, M. (2006), “Measuring the impact of human resource
management practices on hospitality firms’ performances”, International Journal of Hospitality
Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 262-77.
Crager, B. (2006). Permanent employee versus contract work: what the best for oil and gas industry?.
World energy magazine. Vol. 9(1).
50 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
Craig, A.M. & Charles, C.M (2008). Introduction to Eudcational Research. 6th edition. Boston: Pearson
A&B, 2008
Doherty, L. & Manfredi, S. (2006) Action research to develop work-life balance in a UK university,
Women in Management Review, 21(3), 241-259.
Dundas, K. (2008). Work-Life Balance: There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution, In O'Rourke, K. (Ed.)
(2008), Managing Matters, New South Wales, Graduate College of Management, Southern
Cross University.
Eikhof, D. R., Warhurst, C. & Haunschild, A. (2007) Introduction: What work? What life? What balance?
Critical reflections on the work-life balance debate', Employee Relations, 29(4), 325-333.
supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention”,
Journal of Applied Psychology,, Vol. 87, pp. 565-73.
Elangovan, A.R., (2001). Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction and commitment, and intention to quit:
a structural equation analysis. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 22, 159- 16.
Ezzedeen, S. R., & Swiercz, P. M. (2002). Rethinking worklife balance: Development and validation of
the cognitive intrusion of work scale (CIWS)—A dissertation research proposal. Proceedings of
the 2002 Eastern Academy of Management Meeting.
Farris, G. F. (2000). Rewards and retention of technical staff. IEEE International Engineering
Management Conference, 617–619.
Fisher-McAuley, G., Stanton, J., Jolton, J., & Gavin, J. (2003). Modelling the relationship between work
life balance and organizational outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the
Society for Industrial-Organizational Psychology. Orlando, April 12, 2003, 1-26.
Greenblatt, E. (2002). Work/life balance: Wisdom or whining. Organizational Dynamics 31, 177-193.
Guthrie, J. (2001), “High involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: evidence from New
Zealand”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 180-90.
Hewitt Associates. (2004). Strategies for Cost Management of the HR Function. Timely Topics Survey
Results Igharia, I. & Greenhaus, J.(1992). The career advancement prospects of managers and
professionals. Decision Sciences. 23(2): pp 478-500.
Heneman, H.G. III and Judge, T.A. (2000), “Compensation attitudes: a review and recommendations
for future research”, in Rynes, S.L. and Gerhart, B. (Eds), Compensation in Organizations:
Progress and Prospects, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 61-103.
51 | P a g e
International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), Volume -2, No.-2, 2012
Hong, L.C., & Kaur, S. (2008), “The Relationship between Organizational Climate, Employee Personality
and Intention to Leave.” International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol. 4 (3).
Hoisch, M. (2001), “Organizational factors influencing longevity in professional, managerial and
administrative employee retention”, UMI Dissertation Services, No. 3038765.
Janet, C. L. C., (2004) The Influence of Human Resource management Practices on the Retention of
Core Employee of Australian Organizations: An Empirical Study. Murdoch University.
Kalliah, T.J. and Beck, A. (2001), “Is the path to burnout and turnover paved by the lack of supervisory
support: a structural equations test”, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 72-8.
Karen, H. C., (2000) compensation, Incentive and Organizational Change: Ideas and Evidence from
Theory and Practice. The Ohio state University
Khatri, N. and Chong, T.F. (2001) Explaining Employee Turnover in an Asian Context. Human Resource
Management Journal, 11(1) 54-74. Kirschenbaum, A. & Weisberg, J. (1990). Predicting worker
turnover: An assessment of intent on actual separations. Human Relations. 43: pp 829-847.
Lim, G.S., Mathis, R.L., and Jackson. J.H. (2010), Human Resource Management. Singapore: Cengage
Learning Asia Pte Ltd.
Mitchell, T.R., Holtom, B.C., Lee, T.W., Sablynski, C.J., and Erez,M. (2001) Why People Stay: Using Job
Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 2(4),
1102-1122.
Milman, A. and Ricci, P. (2004), “Predicting job retention of hourly employees in the lodging industry”,
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 23-41.
Noraani, M., Aminah, A., Jegak, U. & Khairuddin, I. (2010) The Influence of Work-Family Factors on
the Relationship between Job Autonomy and Intention to Stay among Single Mothers in
Malaysia. Asian Journal of Management Research, ISSN 2229 – 3795
Premeaux, S. F., Adkins, C. L. & Mossholder, K. W. (2007). Balancing work and family: A field study of
multi-dimensional, multi-role work-family conflict'. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (1)
705-727.
SASHA (2011), Compilation of Turnover Cost Studies. Retrieved on 13 May 2011, from:
http://cabenefits.com/wp-content/uploads/Sasha-Corp-Employee-Turnover-Cost-Studies.pdf
52 | P a g e
A case study on determinants of human resource practices…..
Dr. Vimala Sanjeevkumar/Ms.Wang wei
Shawan, M. C. (2010), Turnover Prediction Using Attitudes towards Benefits, Pay, and Pay Satisfaction
among Employees and entrepreneurs in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Baltic Journal of
Management, 6(1).
Walsh, K. and Taylor, M. (2007), “Developing in-house careers and retaining management talent”,
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 163-82.
Williams, M.L., McDaniel, M.A. and Nguyen, N.T. (2006), “A meta-analysis of the antecedents and
consequences of pay level satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, pp. 392-413.
Zhang, Y.J. and Chen, J.C. (2010), Motivational Mechanism Research of On-the-job Embeddedness
Effects on Intentions to Stay. Economics and Management School Beijing Forestry University
53 | P a g e