Exploring the Animal Waste Resistome: The Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Through the Use of Livestock Manure

MINI REVIEW published: 22 July 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01416 Exploring the Animal Waste Resistome: The Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Through the Use of Livestock Manure Alice Checcucci, Paolo Trevisi, Diana Luise, Monica Modesto, Sonia Blasioli, Ilaria Braschi* and Paola Mattarelli Department of Agricultural and Food Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy Edited by: Margherita Sosio, Naicons Srl, Italy Reviewed by: Bongkeun Song, College of William & Mary, United States Michael Benedik, Texas A&M University, United States *Correspondence: Ilaria Braschi ilaria.braschi@unibo.it Specialty section: This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology Received: 19 February 2020 Accepted: 02 June 2020 Published: 22 July 2020 Citation: Checcucci A, Trevisi P, Luise D, Modesto M, Blasioli S, Braschi I and Mattarelli P (2020) Exploring the Animal Waste Resistome: The Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Through the Use of Livestock Manure. Front. Microbiol. 11:1416. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01416 Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem of growing concern. Animal manure application to soil is considered to be a main cause of the propagation and dissemination of antibiotic residues, antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the soil-water system. In recent decades, studies on the impact of antibioticcontaminated manure on soil microbiomes have increased exponentially, in particular for taxonomical diversity and ARGs’ diffusion. Antibiotic resistance genes are often located on mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Horizontal transfer of MGEs toward a broad range of bacteria (pathogens and human commensals included) has been identified as the main cause for their persistence and dissemination. Chemical and bio-sanitizing treatments reduce the antibiotic load and ARB. Nevertheless, effects of these treatments on the persistence of resistance genes must be carefully considered. This review analyzed the most recent research on antibiotic and ARG environmental dissemination conveyed by livestock waste. Strategies to control ARG dissemination and antibiotic persistence were reviewed with the aim to identify methods for monitoring DNA transferability and environmental conditions promoting such diffusion. Keywords: veterinary antibiotics, animal manure, antibiotic resistance genes, crop soils, antimicrobial resistance INTRODUCTION In recent decades, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine has become a serious public health issue (World Health Organization, 2014; Aidara-Kane et al., 2018). The increased number of resistant pathogens and commensal bacteria has been associated with the environmental spread of antibiotics and the propagation of antimicrobial resistant genes (ARGs; Levy, 1998; Witte, 1998; He et al., 2020). Furthermore, the environmental diffusion of antibiotics may lead to the change (Han et al., 2018) and loss (Chen et al., 2019) of microbial community diversity in soil (Kemper, 2008). Antibiotics are used worldwide in livestock production, thus increasing the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) spread. When administered for prophylactic treatments, antibiotics can directly increase selective pressure, thus favoring the generation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB; Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org 1 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure site for exogenous gene cassettes, which can be acquired and converted in functional and expressed genes (Mazel, 2006). Integrons can move horizontally in bacterial populations by frequent integration in plasmids or in transposons (RoweMagnus and Mazel, 2002). According to their aminoacidic sequence, integrases are divided into several classes. Classes 1, 2, and 3 (Inti1, Inti2, Inti3) were the first to be identified as associated with MGEs, while class 4 (Inti4) was associated with chromosomal integration (Deng et al., 2015). Among elements which facilitate DNA transfer, class 1 integron (int1) is the most frequently identified as responsible for spreading antibiotic resistance determinants amongst commensals and pathogens of humans and domesticated animals. Moreover, int1 cassette was found in different environments, such as fresh water, sediments, and sludge (Collis and Hall, 1995; Hall and Collis, 1998; Nardelli et al., 2012; Borruso et al., 2016), where it showed significantly positive correlations with the relative ARG abundance (Zhao et al., 2019). Antibiotic residues, once entered into soil through manure application, can enhance persistence and HGT of ARGs (Binh et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2019) through plasmids and integrons (Gotz and Smalla, 1997; Smalla et al., 2000; Sengeløv et al., 2003), promoting the spread of ARB in the environment and affecting the microbial community composition (Chen et al., 2019). Although manure-derived bacteria cannot always adapt to new environments, the antimicrobials can favor the enrichment of specific bacterial taxa in soils (through positive selection) and suppress others (Ding et al., 2014). In addition, the concentration of antibiotics in manure, usually at a sub-inhibitory level, can affect the interactions among strains and impact on gene expression and regulation (Gillings, 2013; Jechalke et al., 2014; Brüssow, 2015). When manure is used as a fertilizer for crop production, both the increased ARB load and the antibiotic residues contained within may have negative effects on plant development and food product quality (Verraes et al., 2013; Mirza et al., 2020; Muhammad et al., 2020). In addition, antibiotic residues can persist and accumulate in the environment (Jechalke et al., 2014) by adsorption on soil solid phases (Du and Liu, 2012). Pruden et al., 2013; Troiano et al., 2018; Blau et al., 2019). For these reasons, improved livestock and waste management strategies (i.e., diets, proximity between animals, waste treatment, use of additives, and operating conditions) should be adopted to limit the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry. Antimicrobial resistant genes can enter and persist in ecosystem through multiple pathways. They spread across soil (Binh et al., 2007), crops (Su et al., 2015), and gut microbial communities of wild and livestock animals and of humans (Yadav and Kapley, 2019). Antimicrobial resistant genes’ spread occurs through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), as phages, plasmids (Fondi and Fani, 2010), transposons, or integron gene cassettes (Figure 1). The acquisition of AMR by bacteria may be due to spontaneous mutations (Woodford and Ellington, 2007) or, more frequently, by gaining specific ARGs from other bacteria through HGT. High density of microbial cells in the presence of antimicrobial compounds and nutrients, as observable in manure (Blau et al., 2018), triggers HGT events among bacteria, thus conferring selective advantage to the hosts (Thomas and Nielsen, 2005). Mutations are essential for the continuous evolution of ARGs, producing hundreds of variants which are hardly identifiable and increasingly dangerous for the environment (Woodford and Ellington, 2007). In this review, the effect of antibiotic occurrence in animal manure on the dissemination of AMR and ARGs in agricultural fields are discussed in a critical way. The main strategies to mitigate ARGs’ dissemination and to control antibiotic persistence are also reported. Methods monitoring changes in microbial communities and transferability and environmental diffusion of DNA were addressed as well. THE DISSEMINATION MECHANISMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESISTOME The “resistome,” i.e., the total amount of resistance genes associated with an ecosystem (Finley et al., 2013), is generally mediated by conjugative plasmids. The resistome confers resistance of antibiotics and heavy metals to microorganisms, thus enhancing their survival in hostile environments (Bennett, 2008; Song et al., 2017). IncP-1, a common environmental plasmid group, is largely known for its efficient conjugative transferability potential and stable replication in a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria (Heuer et al., 2012). Conversely, plasmids IncF (Villa et al., 2010), IncI (Blau et al., 2018), and IncQ (Rawlings and Tietze, 2001) show a narrower host range. These plasmids are assumed to be important for the dissemination of ARG in Escherichia coli and other Enterobacteriaceae (Johnson and Nolan, 2009; Suzuki et al., 2010; Heuer et al., 2012; Van Houdt et al., 2013). As evidence, the study of the mechanisms of diffusion of these plasmids (Teuber, 2001) and compatibility evolution with broad or narrow host ranges should allow for ARG diffusion prediction. Integrons play a key role in the fast spread of resistance determinants toward antibiotics. They are genetic elements composed of a gene encoding an integrase and an integration Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org ARGs IN THE ENVIRONMENT The majority of antibiotics are naturally produced by microbes as a self-protection mechanism against other microorganisms. ARGs have been always present in the environment. ARGs encoding resistance for a large set of antibiotics have been found in 30,000-year-old Beringian permafrost and in bacteria isolated from prehistoric caves (D’Costa et al., 2011; Berglund, 2015). When present in the environment at a sub-inhibitory concentration, antibiotics frequently play a role in transcription regulation and in the exchange of signals among cells (i.e., quorum sensing mechanism and conjugation) (Reygaert, 2018). Antibiotic resistance consists of a large variety of mechanisms, such as inactivation by specific cleaving enzymes, exclusion from cells via efflux pumps, interference with protein synthesis, limitation of drug uptake, and modification of antibiotic target. 2 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure FIGURE 1 | Spread of ARGs and ARB in farm-related environments. ARB, antimicrobial resistant bacteria; ARG, antibiotic resistance gene; AMS, antimicrobial sensitive; HGT, horizontal gene transfer. ARGs’ maintenance depends on their considerably low fitness cost. In fact, once a specific ARG has been acquired by a bacterial cell, it must evolve to produce more benefits than costs in order for multiple copies of the same gene to be kept and to maintain the expression control of genes in MGEs (BengtssonPalme et al., 2017). Furthermore, as already mentioned, nutrient rich environments can positively influence the ARGs’ spread and facilitate cell–cell interactions (Manaia et al., 2018) (Figure 1). Resistance acquired through MGEs and plasmids is responsible for the last two mechanisms in which the resistance extent depends on bacterial species and acquired ARGs (Reygaert, 2018; Kraemer et al., 2019). The antibiotic selective pressure driving the acquired resistance determines accurate ARGs’ specialization, thus making the environment a potential reservoir. Anthropogenic activities affect antibiotic and ARGs’ spread with somewhat predictable effects (Vikesland et al., 2017). In livestock farming, the use of antibiotics varies depending on the farming type and location, having a considerable effect on ARGs’ concentration. Among the ARGs most frequently detected in livestock production, those related to sulfonamide resistance (sul) (Table 1) are particularly diffused in aquatic systems (Chen et al., 2015; Makowska et al., 2016). In surface and fresh waters, sul genes were found in IncQ plasmid group (Sköld, 2001; Berglund, 2015). Similarly, diaminopyrimidine genes (dfr), which confer resistance to antimicrobial trimethoprim, have been identified in both class 1 and class 2 integrons (Deng et al., 2015). Similarly, quinolone resistance qnr genes have been frequently associated with different plasmid groups. Both dfr and qnr genes easily disseminate in the environment, being found in surface waters (Berglund, 2015), wastewaters, and related irrigated soils (Dalkmann et al., 2012). Tetracycline resistance genes (tet) are widely diffused in different pathogenic and environmental bacteria (Roberts, 2005) and are often detected in sewage treatment plants, soil, and surface and ground water (CheeSanford et al., 2001; Berglund, 2015). In the same environments, erm genes, which are the most widespread macrolides resistance gene, were isolated. Essentially, ARGs’ diffusion is associated with a stress response activated by exposure to antibiotics as well as with the mobilization of several integrative and conjugative elements. Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org THE USE OF VETERINARY ANTIBIOTICS In veterinary medicine, antimicrobials can be used as therapeutics and/or growth promoters. Antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) are antimicrobial substances administered at a sub-therapeutic dose for a prolonged time with the main purpose being to improve the feed conversion rate, especially in young animals, raising the economical profit of farmers. Since 2006, both the European Union and Australia have forbidden the use of AGPs. Nevertheless, in most other countries the use of AGPs is still permitted (Guardabassi et al., 2009). Among breeding farms, poultry and pig livestock have received the majority of antibiotics for therapeutic or prophylactic use (Ungemach, 2000; Kim et al., 2011), resulting in an abundance of ARGs greater than three orders of magnitude compared to other farming systems, such as fish and cattle farming. Several studies confirmed swine farms as a hot-spot for ARB and ARGs (Rosen, 1995; Cromwell, 2002; de Greeff et al., 2019; Petrin et al., 2019). Recently, the scientific community investigated prevalence, abundance, and possible mobilization of ARGs in pig farms and surrounding environments (Hölzel et al., 2010; Marti Serrano, 2014; Petrin et al., 2019; Van den Meersche et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019). 3 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Antibiotic family Most used Animal Farming Use Contrasted bacteria and recognized main targets Resistance mechanism Main ARGs Macrolides Tylosin Cattle Gastrointestinal and respiratory infections Gram-positive bacteria. Interference with protein synthesis (sequestration of mRNA ribosome-binding site) erm, msr, mef genes Erytromycin Pig Clarithromycin Poultry Sulfamethazine Cattle Urinary tract infections Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Main target: Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurellaceae Interference with folic acid synthesis competing for the enzyme DHPS sulI, sulII genes Pig Respiratory infections Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Interference with efflux pump systems tet genes Intestinal infections Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including mycobacteria, and anaerobes Mutations in the genes encoding quinolone target DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, interference with efflux pump systems qnr genes Pig Respiratory diseases Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Interference with cell wall synthesis and permeability, inactivation through β-Lactamase enzyme bla, amp, pen genes, Cattle Necrotic enteritis Intestinal infections Gram-positive, and Gram-negative bacteria, if aerobic Inhibition of protein synthesis (rhibosome interference) aac, aad, aad aph genes Pig Respiratory disease, foot rot Broad spectrum. Main target: Photobacterium, Salmonella, E. coli Enzymatic modification of antibiotic molecules cat, pp-flo, flo genes Horse Post-weaning scours Gram-positive and many Gram-negative bacteria. Main target: Enterobacteriaceae Interference with folic acid synthesis by binding the enzyme DHFR dfr genes Sulfonamides Checcucci et al. Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org TABLE 1 | The most commonly used antibiotics and the relative ARGs in livestock production (DHPS, dihydropteroate synthase; DHPR, dihydropyridine-resistant). Main target: Lawsonia intracellularis Staphylococcus aureus Poultry Tetracyclines Chlortetracycline Cattle Systemic and local infections Oxytetracyclines Pig Gastrointestinal and respiratory infections Poultry Fluoroquinolones (Enrofloxacin, Danofloxacin, Marbofloxacine) Pig β-lactams Penicillins (Amoxycilline, Ampicillines) Cephalosporins, Carbapenems 4 Doxycycline Quinolones Cattle Poultry Dog Cat Streptomycin, Spectinomycin, Neomycin, Aspramycin, Gentamycin, Lincomycin Phenicols Chloramphenicol Pig Poultry July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Thiamphenicols (thiamphenicol, florfenicol) Diaminopyrimidines Trimethoprim Pig (Continued) Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure Aminoglycosides Pig Poultry Valnemulin Cattle Tiamulin Pig Pleuromutilins Poultry Poultry Lincomycin Lincosamides Pig Bacitracin, Colistin Polypeptides Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org Table 1 summarizes the main antibiotic families and the most used antimicrobics in livestock animals for therapeutic use. Nowadays, more than 150 antimicrobial compounds in livestock production are used. The residues inevitably end up in the environment because of manure application on agricultural lands (Baguer et al., 2000). In 2010, more than 63,000 tons of antimicrobials were consumed by livestock across the globe. The predicted growth of the world’s population allows for an estimated increase in antibiotic consumption of up to 105,000 tons by 2030 (Tasho and Cho, 2016). For this reason, specific action plans have been defined to reduce the use of antibiotics as therapeutics for livestock in several countries (i.e., the European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance, 2017; the National Strategy to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, proposed by the White House, 2014; the National Action Plan to Contain Antimicrobial Resistance issued by the Chinese National Health and Family Planning Commission, 2016–2020). References: (Schwarz et al., 2001; Petinaki et al., 2008; Guardabassi et al., 2009; Abbas et al., 2011; Van Hoek et al., 2011; Li et al., 2013; Shang et al., 2013; Tasho and Cho, 2016; Deng et al., 2017; Aghapour et al., 2019; https://www.msdvetmanual.com/pharmacology/antibacterial-agents). vga, sal, lsa genes Alteration/protection of the antibiotic target site Pasteurellaceae, Brachyspira, Micoplasma Respiratory and Intestinal infections lnu, lin, erm genes Alteration of the antibiotic target site Gram positive bacteria, most anaerobic and some mycolpasma species. Main target: Staphylococcus aureus Respiratory and Intestinal infections Main Gram positive target: Campylobacter pmr,pho, mcr, kpn genes LPS modification, efflux pump systems regulation Gram-positive (Bacitracin) or Gram negative (Colistin) bacteria. Main Gram negative target: E. coli Salmonela spp. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Acinetobacter. Intestinal diseases Main ARGs Resistance mechanism Use Animal Farming Most used Antibiotic family TABLE 1 | Continued Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure Contrasted bacteria and recognized main targets Checcucci et al. MANURE TREATMENTS Besides direct collection into aerobic or anaerobic lagoons, animal manure can undergo drying and liquid-solid phase separation. Manure solid phase, as well as whole manure if shovellable, is traditionally composted to produce biofertilizer. Currently, anaerobic digestion and biological treatments of animal manure are often adopted on intensive animal farms (Van Epps and Blaney, 2016). Composting can substantially reduce the antibiotic load, especially during the thermophilic phase (Zhang et al., 2019), but recalcitrant antibiotics accumulate in compost products and in amended soil (Bohrer et al., 2019; Zang et al., 2019). A general ARG abatement (0.7–2.0 log decrease) is obtained through thermophilic composting of swine, cattle, and poultry manure, depending on manure type and operational conditions (He et al., 2020). Biological treatments of animal manure and wastewater, which are adopted to reduce the environmental input of nitrates, slightly decreases the levels of antibiotic residues and pathogenic bacteria (Van den Meersche et al., 2019). Antimicrobial resistant gene reduction of 0.1–3.3 log is observed in swine manure after treatment (He et al., 2020). Anerobic digestion (AD) is adopted to stabilize manure with a final production of methane (Fubin et al., 2016, 2017). A 0.3– 52 log decrease of ARGs was observed in digestate from swine wastewater (He et al., 2020). Interestingly, the higher the content of volatile solids in manure and the mixing rate, the higher the ARGs number in the digestate (Turker et al., 2018). The combined pasteurization and AD of swine manure reduced sole archaeal communities, whereas simple AD affected bacteria and archea (Fubin et al., 2020). Manure pretreatment with bacterial strains is effective in degrading antibiotics (Liu et al., 2019) and enhancing biogas production, but the overall effect on ARB and ARGs was not addressed. Constructed wetlands are vegetated aquatic systems that can be adopted for the treatment of wastewater and agricultural drainage water (Lavrnic et al., 2018). Their ability to reduce 5 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure environments. Recently, plasmids from municipal sewage sludge and recipient bacteria were analyzed for their transferability by exogenous isolation (Blau et al., 2018; Wolters et al., 2018). Referring to pig manure samples, four IncQ-like plasmids were isolated in recipient strains: Pseudomonas putida UWC1, Acinetobacter sp., Ralstonia eutropha, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and E. coli. The plasmid transferability in E. coli strains was not efficient, underlying a broad but highly specific host range (Smalla et al., 2000). Recently, simplified mathematical models have been applied to predict and quantify ARGs’ spread in livestock animal gut microbiomes (Andersen et al., 2020) and in agricultural waste (Baker et al., 2016). In such environments, the variables involved in the ARGs’ spread are countless and depend on a wide range of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as genetic mechanisms of ARB replication, HGT dynamics, environmental and stressor conditions, and microbiota composition. Therefore, future research should focus on the improvement of predictive models of ARGs’ dissemination mechanism, exploitable for targeted operations in livestock waste management. ARGs in swine wastewater resulted in a 0.18–3 log decrease (He et al., 2020). Oxidizing post-treatments, as ozonation or Fenton conditions, can be used on animal or treated wastewaters to degrade antibiotics and bacteria thanks to the activity of reactive oxygen species (Balcıoğlu and Ötker, 2003; Ikehata et al., 2006; Uslu and Balcıoğlu, 2009). Among advanced oxidation processes, highly costly ionizing radiations are known for their ability to destroy microbial DNA. Therefore, affordable combinations of ionizing radiation and oxidation allows for the degradation of antibiotics and ARGs in organic matrices, although with a high biological and environmental risk (Chu et al., 2019, 2020). DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO RESISTOME PROFILING STUDY Even though AMRs introduced in the environment with animal manure have been largely explored (Dolliver et al., 2008; Selvam et al., 2012b), contradictory information exists regarding the fate of ARGs (Selvam et al., 2012a; Wang et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2016). The growing need for the control of ARGs’ spread prompted the scientific community to set up and to validate refined molecular methods for the study of ARGs’ dissemination dynamics among environmental microbial communities. Both 16S rRNA amplicon and untargeted sequencing can be considered exhaustive methods for the exploration of microbial community structure in manure-fertilized soil and farm waste. Several studies on resistome diffusion in wastewater treatment plants (Yadav and Kapley, 2019), sewage sludge composting units (Su et al., 2015), and urban sewage support the metagenomic approach (Hendriksen et al., 2019) in monitoring ARGs’ level during treatments and seasonal changes. A recent work (Han et al., 2018) showed that the shift in soil bacterial communities caused by manure application leads to changes in the soil bacteria resistome. Recently, studies on the detection of genetic markers associated with AMR (transposases and class 1 integronintegrase genes) and ARGs have been markedly increasing. The quantification of ARGs in soils amended with livestock and swine manure (Brooks et al., 2014; Tao et al., 2014) was performed with high-throughput qPCR assay (Rocha et al., 2018; Blau et al., 2019). In a recent study, both intracellular and extracellular DNA containing ARGs were quantified in sludge at about 1010 and 1012 copies per gram, respectively (Dong et al., 2019). Here, the intracellular ARGs were assessed through conjugation with cell-cell contact, whereas the extracellular ARGs were assessed through natural transformation. Several works on different manure types focused on the quantification of targeted genes intI1 and intI2 for class 1 and 2 integron-integrase genes and korB gene, specific for IncP-1 plasmids, together with ARGs (Hu et al., 2016; Blau et al., 2018, 2019). As already reported, plasmid-mediated ARGs’ diffusion is frequently used, especially for the role of plasmids in the rapid bacterial adaptation and fitness improvement (Smalla et al., 2000). Exogenous plasmid isolation techniques (Bale et al., 1988) clarified how plasmids diffuse in different Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org CONCLUSION Although a decrease in the use of antibiotics in livestock production is highly recommended, antibiotics’ overuse remains an important issue to solve. The uncontrolled spread of ARB and ARGs in the environment due to soil manuring is of serious concern. Many studies highlight ARGs’ presence in microbial communities of livestock manure and manured agricultural fields, despite the improved livestock and waste management strategies to contain in-farm ARGs’ spread. In the last thirty years, knowledge on pathways of ARGs’ diffusion from animal waste to the environment was enriched by multidisciplinary research approaches. In light of the current knowledge, the study of the dynamics of AMR and ARGs’ spread in manure and environments surrounding livestock farms should combine molecular and functional genetics strategies with prediction models of the diffusion of MGEs (integrons and plasmids) and metagenomic data. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS AC: original draft preparation, figure and table conceptualization, review, and editing. PT, MM, and SB: review. DL: original draft preparation and table preparation. IB and PM: original draft preparation and review. All authors contributed to critically revising the manuscript and gave final approval for publication. FUNDING This research was supported by Programma di Sviluppo Rurale 2014-2020 Regione Lombardia (Project REFLUA: Swine manure and environment). 6 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure REFERENCES Chen, Q.-L., An, X.-L., Zheng, B.-X., Gillings, M., Peñuelas, J., Cui, L., et al. (2019). Loss of soil microbial diversity exacerbates spread of antibiotic resistance. Soil Ecol. Lett. 1, 3–13. doi: 10.1007/s42832-019-0011-0 Chu, L., Chen, D., Wang, J., Yang, Z., and Shen, Y. (2019). Degradation of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in erythromycin fermentation residues using radiation coupled with peroxymonosulfate oxidation. Waste Manag. 96, 190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.031 Chu, L., Chen, D., Wang, J., Yang, Z., Yang, Q., and Shen, Y. (2020). Degradation of antibiotics and inactivation of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in Cephalosporin C fermentation residues using ionizing radiation, ozonation and thermal treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 382:121058. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019. 121058 Collis, C. M., and Hall, R. M. (1995). Expression of antibiotic resistance genes in the integrated cassettes of integrons. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 155–162. doi: 10.1128/aac.39.1.155 Cromwell, G. L. (2002). Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim. Biotechnol. 13, 7–27. doi: 10.1081/abio-120005767 Dalkmann, P., Broszat, M., Siebe, C., Willaschek, E., Sakinc, T., Huebner, J., et al. (2012). Accumulation of pharmaceuticals, Enterococcus, and resistance genes in soils irrigated with wastewater for zero to 100 years in central Mexico. PLoS One 7:e45397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045397 D’Costa, V. M., King, C. E., Kalan, L., Morar, M., Sung, W. W. L., Schwarz, C., et al. (2011). Antibiotic resistance is ancient. Nature 477:457. de Greeff, S. C., Mouton, J. W., Schoffelen, A. F., and Verduin, C. M. (2019). NethMap 2019: Consumption of antimicrobial agents and antimicrobial resistance among medically important bacteria in the Netherlands/MARAN 2019: Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance and Antibiotic Usage in Animals in the Netherlands in 2018. Bilthoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, doi: 10.21945/RIVM-2019-0038 Deng, F., Wang, H., Liao, Y., Li, J., Feßler, A. T., Michael, G. B., et al. (2017). Detection and genetic environment of pleuromutilin-lincosamidestreptogramin A resistance genes in staphylococci isolated from pets. Front. Microbiol. 8:234. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00234 Deng, Y., Bao, X., Ji, L., Chen, L., Liu, J., Miao, J., et al. (2015). Resistance integrons: class 1, 2 and 3 integrons. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 14:45. Ding, G.-C., Radl, V., Schloter-Hai, B., Jechalke, S., Heuer, H., Smalla, K., et al. (2014). Dynamics of soil bacterial communities in response to repeated application of manure containing sulfadiazine. PLoS One 9:e92958. doi: 10. 1371/journal.pone.0092958 Dolliver, H., Gupta, S., and Noll, S. (2008). Antibiotic degradation during manure composting. J. Environ. Qual. 37, 1245–1253. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007. 0399 Dong, P., Wang, H., Fang, T., Wang, Y., and Ye, Q. (2019). Assessment of extracellular antibiotic resistance genes (eARGs) in typical environmental samples and the transforming ability of eARG. Environ. Int. 125, 90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.050 Du, L., and Liu, W. (2012). Occurrence, fate, and ecotoxicity of antibiotics in agroecosystems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 32, 309–327. doi: 10.1007/s13593011-0062-9 Finley, R. L., Collignon, P., Larsson, D. G. J., McEwen, S. A., Li, X.-Z., Gaze, W. H., et al. (2013). The scourge of antibiotic resistance: the important role of the environment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 57, 704–710. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit355 Fondi, M., and Fani, R. (2010). The horizontal flow of the plasmid resistome: clues from inter-generic similarity networks. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 3228–3242. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02295.x Fubin, Y., Dong, H., Zhang, W., Zhu, Z., and Shang, B. (2020). Additional function of pasteurisation pretreatment in combination with anaerobic digestion on antibiotic removal. Bioresour. Technol. 297:122414. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech. 2019.122414 Fubin, Y., Ji, C., Dong, H., Tao, X., and Chen, Y. (2016). Research progress on effect of antibiotic on anaerobic digestion treatment in animal manure. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 18, 171–177. Fubin, Y., Zifu, L., Saino, M., and Hongmin, D. (2017). Performance of alkaline pretreatment on pathogens inactivation and sludge solubilization. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 10, 216–223. Gillings, M. R. (2013). Evolutionary consequences of antibiotic use for the resistome, mobilome and microbial pangenome. Front. Microbiol. 4:4. doi: 10. 3389/fmicb.2013.00004 Abbas, R. Z., Iqbal, Z., Blake, D., Khan, M. N., and Saleemi, M. K. (2011). Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: the state of play revisited. Worlds. Poult. Sci. J. 67, 337–350. doi: 10.1017/s004393391100033x Aghapour, Z., Gholizadeh, P., Ganbarov, K., Bialvaei, A. Z., Mahmood, S. S., Tanomand, A., et al. (2019). Molecular mechanisms related to colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. Infect. Drug Resist. 12, 965. doi: 10.2147/idr.s199844 Aidara-Kane, A., Angulo, F. J., Conly, J. M., Minato, Y., Silbergeld, E. K., McEwen, S. A., et al. (2018). World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on use of medically important antimicrobials in food-producing animals. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 7:7. Andersen, V. D., Aarestrup, F. M., Munk, P., Jensen, M. S., de Knegt, L. V., Bortolaia, V., et al. (2020). Predicting effects of changed antimicrobial usage on the abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes in finisher’gut microbiomes. Prev. Vet. Med. 174:104853. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104853 Baguer, A. J., Jensen, J., and Krogh, P. H. (2000). Effects of the antibiotics oxytetracycline and tylosin on soil fauna. Chemosphere 40, 751–757. doi: 10. 1016/s0045-6535(99)00449-x Baker, M., Hobman, J. L., Dodd, C. E. R., Ramsden, S. J., and Stekel, D. J. (2016). Mathematical modelling of antimicrobial resistance in agricultural waste highlights importance of gene transfer rate. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92:fiw040. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw040 Balcıoğlu, I. A., and Ötker, M. (2003). Treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing antibiotics by O3 and O3/H2O2 processes. Chemosphere 50, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00534-9 Bale, M. J., Day, M. J., and Fry, J. C. (1988). Novel method for studying plasmid transfer in undisturbed river epilithon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 2756–2758. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2756-2758.1988 Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E., and Larsson, D. G. J. (2017). Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42:fux053. Bennett, P. M. (2008). Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 153, S347– S357. Berglund, B. (2015). Environmental dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes and correlation to anthropogenic contamination with antibiotics. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 5:28564. doi: 10.3402/iee.v5.28564 Binh, C. T. T., Heuer, H., Gomes, N. C. M., Kotzerke, A., Fulle, M., Wilke, B. M., et al. (2007). Short-term effects of amoxicillin on bacterial communities in manured soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 290–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941. 2007.00393.x Blau, K., Bettermann, A., Jechalke, S., Fornefeld, E., Vanrobaeys, Y., Stalder, T., et al. (2018). The transferable resistome of produce. mBio 9:e01300-18. Blau, K., Samuel, J., Su, J.-Q., Zhu, Y.-G., Smalla, K., and Jechalke, S. (2019). Manure and doxycycline affect the bacterial community and its resistome in lettuce rhizosphere and bulk soil. Front. Microbiol. 10:725. doi: 10.3389/fmicb. 2019.00725 Bohrer, R. E. G., Carissimi, E., Lopez, D. A. R., Wolff, D. B., da Silva, D. M., and Prestes, O. D. (2019). Composting of swine waste in the treatment of veterinary drug residues. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 40, 2813–2830. Borruso, L., Harms, K., Johnsen, P. J., Nielsen, K. M., and Brusetti, L. (2016). Distribution of class 1 integrons in a highly impacted catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 566, 1588–1594. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.054 Brooks, J. P., Adeli, A., and McLaughlin, M. R. (2014). Microbial ecology, bacterial pathogens, and antibiotic resistant genes in swine manure wastewater as influenced by three swine management systems. Water Res. 57, 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.017 Brüssow, H. (2015). Microbiota and the human nature: know thyself. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 10–15. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12693 Chee-Sanford, J. C., Aminov, R. I., Krapac, I. J., Garrigues-Jeanjean, N., and Mackie, R. I. (2001). Occurrence and diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in lagoons and groundwater underlying two swine production facilities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 1494–1502. doi: 10.1128/aem.67.4.1494-1502.2001 Chen, B., Hao, L., Guo, X., Wang, N., and Ye, B. (2015). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes of wastewater and surface water in livestock farms of Jiangsu Province. China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 13950–13959. doi: 10.1007/ s11356-015-4636-y Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org 7 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure Gotz, A., and Smalla, K. (1997). Manure enhances plasmid mobilization and survival of Pseudomonas putida introduced into field soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 1980–1986. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.5.1980-1986.1997 Guardabassi, L., Jensen, L. B., and Kruse, H. (2009). Guide to Antimicrobial Use in Animals. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Hall, R. M., and Collis, C. M. (1998). Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria: the role of gene cassettes and integrons. Drug Resist. Updat. 1, 109–119. doi: 10.1016/s1368-7646(98)80026-5 Han, X.-M., Hu, H.-W., Chen, Q.-L., Yang, L.-Y., Li, H.-L., Zhu, Y.-G., et al. (2018). Antibiotic resistance genes and associated bacterial communities in agricultural soils amended with different sources of animal manures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 126, 91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.018 He, Y., Yuan, Q., Mathieu, J., Stadler, L., Senehi, N., Sun, R., et al. (2020). Antibiotic resistance genes from livestock waste: occurrence, dissemination, and treatment. NPJ Clean Water 3, 1–11. Hendriksen, R. S., Munk, P., Njage, P., Van Bunnik, B., McNally, L., Lukjancenko, O., et al. (2019). Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nat. Commun. 10:1124. Heuer, H., Binh, C. T. T., Jechalke, S., Kopmann, C., Zimmerling, U., Krögerrecklenfort, E., et al. (2012). IncP-1ε plasmids are important vectors of antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural systems: diversification driven by class 1 integron gene cassettes. Front. Microbiol. 3:2. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012. 00002 Hölzel, C. S., Schwaiger, K., Harms, K., Küchenhoff, H., Kunz, A., Meyer, K., et al. (2010). Sewage sludge and liquid pig manure as possible sources of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Environ. Res. 110, 318–326. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2010. 02.009 Van Houdt, R., Toussaint, A., Ryan, M. P., Pembroke, J. T., Mergeay, M., and Adley, C. C. (2013). “The Tn4371 ICE family of bacterial mobile genetic elements,” in Bacterial Integrative Mobile Genetic Elements, eds A. P. Roberts and P. Mullany (Milton Park: Taylor & Francis). Hu, H.-W., Han, X.-M., Shi, X.-Z., Wang, J.-T., Han, L.-L., Chen, D., et al. (2016). Temporal changes of antibiotic-resistance genes and bacterial communities in two contrasting soils treated with cattle manure. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92:fiv169. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv169 Ikehata, K., Jodeiri Naghashkar, N., and Gamal El-Din, M. (2006). Degradation of aqueous pharmaceuticals by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone Sci. Eng. 28, 353–414. doi: 10.1080/01919510600985937 Jechalke, S., Heuer, H., Siemens, J., Amelung, W., and Smalla, K. (2014). Fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics in soil. Trends Microbiol. 22, 536–545. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.05.005 Johnson, T. J., and Nolan, L. K. (2009). Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 750–774. doi: 10.1128/mmbr. 00015-09 Kemper, N. (2008). Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol. Indic. 8, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.06.002 Kim, K.-R., Owens, G., Kwon, S.-I., So, K.-H., Lee, D.-B., and Ok, Y. S. (2011). Occurrence and environmental fate of veterinary antibiotics in the terrestrial environment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 214, 163–174. doi: 10.1007/s11270-0100412-2 Kraemer, S. A., Ramachandran, A., and Perron, G. G. (2019). Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms 7:180. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7060180 Lavrnic, S., Braschi, I., Anconelli, S., Blasioli, S., Solimando, D., Mannini, P., et al. (2018). Long-term monitoring of a surface flow constructed wetland treating agricultural drainage water in northern Italy. Water 10:644. doi: 10.3390/ w10050644 Levy, S. B. (1998). Multidrug resistance—a sign of the times in Multidrug resistance—a sign of the times. N. Engl. J. Med. 338, 1376–1378. doi: 10.1056/ nejm199805073381909 Li, L., Sun, J., Liu, B., Zhao, D., Ma, J., Deng, H., et al. (2013). Quantification of lincomycin resistance genes associated with lincomycin residues in waters and soils adjacent to representative swine farms in China. Front. Microbiol. 4:364. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00364 Liu, M., Ni, H., Yang, L., Chen, G., Yan, X., Leng, X., et al. (2019). Pretreatment of swine manure containing β-lactam antibiotics with whole-cell biocatalyst to improve biogas production. J. Clean. Prod. 240:118070. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.118070 Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org Makowska, N., Koczura, R., and Mokracka, J. (2016). Class 1 integrase, sulfonamide and tetracycline resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant and surface water. Chemosphere 144, 1665–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.044 Manaia, C. M., Rocha, J., Scaccia, N., Marano, R., Radu, E., Biancullo, F., et al. (2018). Antibiotic resistance in wastewater treatment plants: tackling the black box. Environ. Int. 115, 312–324. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.044 Marti Serrano, E. (2014). Bacteriophages as a reservoir of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and fluoroquinolone resistance genes in the environment. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O456–O459. Mazel, D. (2006). Integrons: agents of bacterial evolution. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 608–620. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1462 Mirza, S. A., Afzaal, M., Begum, S., Arooj, T., Almas, M., Ahmed, S., et al. (2020). “Uptake mechanism of antibiotics in plants,” in Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the Environment, Ed. M. Z. Hashmi (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 183–188. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818882-8.00011-5 Muhammad, J., Khan, S., Su, J. Q., Hesham, A. E. L., Ditta, A., Nawab, J., et al. (2020). Antibiotics in poultry manure and their associated health issues: a systematic review. J. Soils Sediments 20, 486–497. doi: 10.1007/s11368-01902360-0 Nardelli, M., Scalzo, P. M., Ramírez, M. S., Quiroga, M. P., Cassini, M. H., and Centrón, D. (2012). Class 1 integrons in environments with different degrees of urbanization. PLoS One 7:e39223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039223 Petinaki, E., Guérin-Faublée, V., Pichereau, V., Villers, C., Achard, A., Malbruny, B., et al. (2008). Lincomycin resistance gene lnu (D) in Streptococcus uberis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 626–630. doi: 10.1128/aac.01126-07 Petrin, S., Patuzzi, I., Di Cesare, A., Tiengo, A., Sette, G., Biancotto, G., et al. (2019). Evaluation and quantification of antimicrobial residues and antimicrobial resistance genes in two Italian swine farms. Environ. Pollut. 255:113183. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113183 Pruden, A., Larsson, D. J., Amézquita, A., Collignon, P., Brandt, K. K., Graham, D. W., et al. (2013). Management options for reducing the release of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes to the environment. Environ. Health Perspect. 121, 878–885. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206446 Rawlings, D. E., and Tietze, E. (2001). Comparative biology of IncQ and IncQ-like plasmids. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 481–496. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.65.4.481496.2001 Reygaert, W. C. (2018). An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol. 4:482. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 Roberts, M. C. (2005). Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 245, 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.034 Rocha, J., Cacace, D., Kampouris, I., Guilloteau, H., Jäger, T., Marano, R. B. M., et al. (2018). Inter-laboratory calibration of quantitative analyses of antibiotic resistance genes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8:102214. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.02. 022 Rosen, G. D. (1995). “Antibacterials in poultry and pig nutrition,” in Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding, eds R. J. Wallace, and A. Chesson (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley), 172. Rowe-Magnus, D. A., and Mazel, D. (2002). The role of integrons in antibiotic resistance gene capture. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292, 115–125. doi: 10.1078/14384221-00197 Schwarz, S., Kehrenberg, C., and Walsh, T. R. (2001). Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and food animal production. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 17, 431–437. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00297-7 Selvam, A., Xu, D., Zhao, Z., and Wong, J. W. C. (2012a). Fate of tetracycline, sulfonamide and fluoroquinolone resistance genes and the changes in bacterial diversity during composting of swine manure. Bioresour. Technol. 126, 383–390. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.045 Selvam, A., Zhao, Z., and Wong, J. W. C. (2012b). Composting of swine manure spiked with sulfadiazine, chlortetracycline and ciprofloxacin. Bioresour. Technol. 126, 412–417. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.073 Sengeløv, G., Agersø, Y., Halling-Sørensen, B., Baloda, S. B., Andersen, J. S., and Jensen, L. B. (2003). Bacterial antibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treatment with pig manure slurry. Environ. Int. 28, 587–595. doi: 10.1016/s0160-4120(02)00084-3 Shang, R., Wang, J., Guo, W., and Liang, J. (2013). Efficient antibacterial agents: a review of the synthesis, biological evaluation and mechanism of pleuromutilin derivatives. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 13, 3013–3025. doi: 10.2174/ 15680266113136660217 8 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416 Checcucci et al. Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Animal Manure Vikesland, P. J., Pruden, A., Alvarez, P. J. J., Aga, D., Bürgmann, H., Li, X., et al. (2017). Toward a comprehensive strategy to mitigate dissemination of environmental sources of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 13061–13069. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03623 Villa, L., García-Fernández, A., Fortini, D., and Carattoli, A. (2010). Replicon sequence typing of IncF plasmids carrying virulence and resistance determinants. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65, 2518–2529. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq347 Wang, J., Ben, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, M., and Qiang, Z. (2015). Effects of thermophilic composting on oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine, and their corresponding resistance genes in swine manure. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 17, 1654–1660. doi: 10.1039/c5em00132c Witte, W. (1998). Medical consequences of antibiotic use in agriculture. Science 279, 996–997. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5353.996 Wolters, B., Fornefeld, E., Jechalke, S., Su, J.-Q., Zhu, Y.-G., Sørensen, S. J., et al. (2018). Soil amendment with sewage sludge affects soil prokaryotic community composition, mobilome and resistome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95: fiy193. Woodford, N., and Ellington, M. J. (2007). The emergence of antibiotic resistance by mutation. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13, 5–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006. 01492.x World Health Organization (2014). Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance. Geneva: WHO. Wu, B., Qi, Q., Zhang, X., Cai, Y., Yu, G., Lv, J., et al. (2019). Dissemination of Escherichia coli carrying plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes from swine farms to surroundings. Sci. Total Environ. 665, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.272 Xie, W.-Y., Yang, X.-P., Li, Q., Wu, L.-H., Shen, Q.-R., and Zhao, F.-J. (2016). Changes in antibiotic concentrations and antibiotic resistome during commercial composting of animal manures. Environ. Pollut. 219, 182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.044 Yadav, S., and Kapley, A. (2019). Exploration of activated sludge resistome using metagenomics. Sci. Total Environ. 692, 1155–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2019.07.267 Zang, J., Shih, J. C. H., Cheng, J. J., Liu, Z., Liu, Y., and Lu, W. (2019). Thermophilic solid state anaerobic digestion of switchgrass for liquid digestate reuse and organic fertilizer production. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 1–10. doi: 10.1017/ s1742170519000139 Zhang, M., He, L.-Y., Liu, Y.-S., Zhao, J.-L., Liu, W.-R., Zhang, J.-N., et al. (2019). Fate of veterinary antibiotics during animal manure composting. Sci. Total Environ. 650, 1363–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.147 Zhao, X., Wang, J., Zhu, L., and Wang, J. (2019). Field-based evidence for enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in manure-amended vegetable soils. Sci. Total Environ. 654, 906–913. doi: 10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.446 Sköld, O. (2001). Resistance to trimethoprim and sulfonamides. Vet. Res. 32, 261–273. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2001123 Smalla, K., Heuer, H., Götz, A., Niemeyer, D., Krögerrecklenfort, E., and Tietze, E. (2000). Exogenous isolation of antibiotic resistance plasmids from piggery manure slurries reveals a high prevalence and diversity of IncQ-like plasmids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 4854–4862. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.11.4854-4862. 2000 Song, J., Rensing, C., Holm, P. E., Virta, M., and Brandt, K. K. (2017). Comparison of metals and tetracycline as selective agents for development of tetracycline resistant bacterial communities in agricultural soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3040–3047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b05342 Su, J.-Q., Wei, B., Ou-Yang, W.-Y., Huang, F.-Y., Zhao, Y., Xu, H.-J., et al. (2015). Antibiotic resistome and its association with bacterial communities during sewage sludge composting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7356–7363. doi: 10.1021/ acs.est.5b01012 Suzuki, H., Yano, H., Brown, C. J., and Top, E. M. (2010). Predicting plasmid promiscuity based on genomic signature. J. Bacteriol. 192, 6045–6055. doi: 10.1128/jb.00277-10 Tao, C.-W., Hsu, B.-M., Ji, W.-T., Hsu, T.-K., Kao, P.-M., Hsu, C.-P., et al. (2014). Evaluation of five antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment systems of swine farms by real-time PCR. Sci. Total Environ. 496, 116–121. doi: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2014.07.024 Tasho, R. P., and Cho, J. Y. (2016). Veterinary antibiotics in animal waste, its distribution in soil and uptake by plants: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 563, 366–376. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.140 Teuber, M. (2001). Veterinary use and antibiotic resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 4, 493–499. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00241-1 Thomas, C. M., and Nielsen, K. M. (2005). Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3:711. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1234 Troiano, E., Beneduce, L., Gross, A., and Ronen, Z. (2018). Antibiotic-resistant bacteria in greywater and greywater-irrigated soils. Front. Microbiol. 9:2666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02666 Turker, G., Akyol, Ç, Ince, O., Aydin, S., and Ince, B. (2018). Operating conditions influence microbial community structures, elimination of the antibiotic resistance genes and metabolites during anaerobic digestion of cow manure in the presence of oxytetracycline. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 147, 349– 356. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.044 Ungemach, F. R. (2000). Figures on quantities of antibacterials used for different purposes in the EU countries and interpretation. Acta Vet. Scand. 93, 89–97. Uslu, M. Ö, and Balcıoğlu, I. A. (2009). Comparison of the ozonation and Fenton process performances for the treatment of antibiotic containing manure. Sci. Total Environ. 407, 3450–3458. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.045 Van den Meersche, T., Rasschaert, G., Haesebrouck, F., Van Coillie, E., Herman, L., Van Weyenberg, S., et al. (2019). Presence and fate of antibiotic residues, antibiotic resistance genes and zoonotic bacteria during biological swine manure treatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 175, 29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv. 2019.01.127 Van Epps, A., and Blaney, L. (2016). Antibiotic residues in animal waste: occurrence and degradation in conventional agricultural waste management practices. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2, 135–155. doi: 10.1007/s40726-016-0037-1 Van Hoek, A. H. A. M., Mevius, D., Guerra, B., Mullany, P., Roberts, A. P., and Aarts, H. J. M. (2011). Acquired antibiotic resistance genes: an overview. Front. Microbiol. 2:203. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00203 Verraes, C., Van Boxstael, S., Van Meervenne, E., Van Coillie, E., Butaye, P., Catry, B., et al. (2013). Antimicrobial resistance in the food chain: a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 2643–2669. Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Copyright © 2020 Checcucci, Trevisi, Luise, Modesto, Blasioli, Braschi and Mattarelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. 9 July 2020 | Volume 11 | Article 1416