Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in
Early Post-implantation Mouse Embryos
1,
Xianfa Yang *, Yingying Chen 2, Lu Song3, Ting Zhang4 and Naihe Jing1, 2, *
1
Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory),
Guangzhou 510005, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Cell Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
3
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California,
Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
4
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of
Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Shanghai Engineering Center for
Visual Science and Photomedicine, Shanghai, 200080, China
*For correspondence: yang_xianfa@grmh-gdl.cn; njing@sibcb.ac.cn
[Abstract] Regionalized distribution of genes plays crucial roles in the formation of the spatial pattern
in tissues and embryos during development. In situ hybridization has been one of the most widely used
methods to screen, identify, and validate the spatial distribution of genes in tissues and embryos, due to
its relative simplicity and low cost. However, acquisition of high-quality hybridization signals remains a
challenge while maintaining good tissue morphology, especially for small tissues such as early postimplantation mouse embryos. In this protocol, we present a detailed RNA in situ hybridization protocol
suitable for wholemount early post-implantation mouse embryos and other small tissue samples. This
protocol uses digoxigenin (DIG) labeled riboprobes to hybridize with target transcripts, alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated anti-DIG antibodies to recognize DIG-labeled nucleotides, and nitroblue
tetrazolium (NBT)/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP) chromogenic substrates for color
development. Specific steps and notes on riboprobe preparation, embryo collection, probe hybridization,
and color development are all included in the following protocol.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
1
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
Graphic abstract:
Overview of Wholemount in situ Hybridization in Early Mouse Embryos.
Keywords: Wholemount in situ hybridization, Mouse embryo, Gene expression visualization,
Hybridization
[Background] Wholemount in situ hybridization has been widely used to explore gene expression
distribution in both tissues and sections (Hauptmann and Gerster, 1994; Nieto et al., 1996). In the field
of developmental biology, information on the spatial and temporal distribution of gene expression
revealed by in situ hybridization has facilitated the identification of master regulators of embryogenesis.
In our recent study, we reported that Pou3f1 is an important regulator of mouse neuroectoderm
development by combining wholemount in situ hybridization and multiple functional analyses (Zhu et al.,
2014). We optimized a wholemount RNA in situ hybridization protocol that uses digoxigenin labeled RNA
probes and an anti-digoxigenin antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase to detect the enrichment
of Pou3f1 in the anterior embryonic region of the mouse gastrula, which indicated potential biological
functions of Pou3f1 in embryonic ectoderm development. Thereafter, more lineage regulators of the
mouse gastrulation have been revealed and validated using this optimized protocol (Yang et al., 2018
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
2
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
and 2019; Peng et al., 2016 and 2019). The current protocol exhibits strong experimental robustness
and displays application potential in a wide range of biological studies. Thus, we summarize the protocol
here, in the hope its application can facilitate the study of gene expression.
The wholemount RNA in situ hybridization assay starts with the preparation of digoxigenin labeled
RNA probes corresponding to target gene transcripts by using an in vitro transcription system and
digoxigenin labeled dNTP mix. Pre-fixed embryo samples are treated with H2O2 and protease K for
antigen retrieval and permeabilization. Embryos are then incubated with RNA probes and hybridized
overnight. Several rounds of stringent wash are performed to remove unbound RNA probes.
Subsequently, an antibody that recognizes digoxigenin is added to the reaction system and incubated
overnight. Color development is performed to visualize the signal, and samples can be stored in a 50%
Glycerol/PBS solution.
Further extensions based on the current protocol can be explored in the future, including, but not
limited to, replacing digoxigenin labeled RNA probes with multiple fluorescent RNA probes, replacing
the AP-conjugated DIG antibody with fluorescent conjugated antibodies, and even combining this
method with protein immunofluorescence staining. However, for that to occur, essential optimization and
adjustment of experimental conditions should be carefully performed. Noticeably, multiple alternative
methods have been established these days, such as RNAscope (Wang, 2012). We recognize that the
current protocol may exhibit a relative low detection sensitivity in comparison with RNAscope.
Nevertheless, the outstanding properties of experimental robustness, no requirement for specialized
instruments, and extremely low economic cost undoubtedly make our protocol an excellent option for
the rapid screening and validation of gene expression in multiple fields of biological research.
Materials and Reagents
Note: All materials and reagents should be prepared in a DNase and RNase free environment unless
otherwise described.
1. Pipette tips: 10 µl, 20 µl, 200 µl, 1,000 µl Microvolume tips (Axygen®, catalog numbers: TF-300R-S, TF-20-R-S, TF-200-R-S, TF-1000-R-S)
2. Eppendorf tubes (Axygen®, catalog number: MCT-150-C)
3. 35 mm × 10 mm dish (Corning, catalog number: CLS430165)
4. 24-well plate (Corning, catalog number: 3524)
5. Paraformaldehyde (PFA; Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: P6148-1kg)
6. DPBS (Gibco, catalog number: 14190144)
7. Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: P9416-100ML)
8. Invitrogen UltraPureTM SSC, 20× (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: 15557044)
9. Yeast RNA (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 10109223001)
10. Heparin (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: H3149-500ku)
11. RiboLock RNase Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalog number: Eo0382)
12. ScriptMAX Thermo T7 Transcription Kit (Toyobo, catalog number: TYB-TSK-101)
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
3
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
13. Methanol (e.g., Sensi Chemical)
14. Formamide (e.g., Sensi Chemical)
15. Proteinase K solution (Invitrogen, catalog number: AM2548)
16. Glutaraldehyde (Sinopharm Chemical, catalog number: 30092436)
17. DIG RNA Labeling Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 11277073910)
18. Anti-Digoxigenin AP antibody (Roche, catalog number: 11093274910)
19. NBT/BCIP stock solution (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 11681451001)
20. Glycerol (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: G9012-100 ml)
21. QIAquick Gel extraction kit (QIAGEN, catalog number: 28704)
22. MEGAclearTM Kit (Ambion, catalog number: AM1908)
23. DNase I (RNase-free) (New England Biolabs, catalog number: M0303S)
24. 30% H2O2 (w/w) in H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: H1009-100ML)
25. UltraPure 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0 (Invitrogen, catalog number: 15575020)
26. Albumin, Bovine Serum, Fraction V, Crystalline (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 9048-46-8)
27. NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: S5886-1KG)
28. Tris base (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: TRIS-RO)
29. Magnesium chloride (MgCl2; 1.00 M ± 0.01 M; Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: M1028-100ML)
30. KOD FX neo (Toyobo, catalog number: KFX-201)
31. UltraPureTM DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Invitrogen, catalog number: 10977015)
32. 4% PFA (see Recipes)
33. PTW buffer (see Recipes)
34. 20 mg/ml Yeast RNA (see Recipes)
35. 50 mg/ml Heparin (see Recipes)
36. Hybridization solution (see Recipes)
37. 10× TBST stock (see Recipes)
38. Blocking buffer (see Recipes)
39. NTMT buffer (see Recipes)
40. 4% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde (see Recipes)
41. 6% H2O2/PTW solution (see Recipes)
Equipment
1. Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, model: 9700)
2. Thin-walled PCR tubes with caps (Axygen®, catalog number: PCR-02-L-C)
3. NanoDrop 2000 (Thermal Scientific)
4. Hybridization incubator (SciGene, model: 2000)
5. Olympus SZX10/16 microscope
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
4
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
Procedure
Note: All steps should be performed in a DNase and RNase free environment unless otherwise
described.
A. Collection of Sample/Embryo
1. Carefully collect tissue samples/mouse embryos (Figure 1) in a 35 mm dish or 24-well plate with
DPBS (Downs and Davies, 1993; Piliszek et al., 2011; Pereira et al., 2011).
Figure 1. Representative images of the unstained collected mouse gastrula at E6.5, E7.0,
and E7.5 stages.
Images were acquired with a Olympus SZX10/16 microscope. Scale bars: 100 μm.
2. Fix embryos in 4% PFA (see Recipes) at 4°C overnight.
3. Transfer the embryos into a graded series of methanol (25% Methanol/DPBS; 50%
Methanol/DPBS; 75% Methanol/DPBS; 100% methanol) at room temperature (RT). Embryos
are dehydrated for 5 min in each condition. Sufficient volume should be applied to completely
submerge the embryo samples.
Note: Prepare graded series of methanol buffer right before use.
Pause point: The dehydrated embryos could be stored in 100% methanol at -20°C for up to 1
week.
B. Preparation of digoxigenin labeled RNA Probes
1. Primer design for target cDNA sequence cloning:
For direct transcription of the PCR product in vitro, a minimal T7 promoter sequence (5TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGA-3) should be added to the 5’ terminal of the primer. The
length of probe sequence should be 250-1,500 bases; probes with 600-900 bases exhibit the
highest sensitivity and specificity.
2. PCR amplification and purification of probe DNA:
A cDNA pool with high enrichment of target transcripts was used as PCR template for
amplification of probe DNA. DNA polymerases such as KOD FX Neo with high fidelity
characteristics are recommended. The exact PCR conditions should be adjusted according to
the selected probe. After agarose gel separation, excise target DNA fragments precisely and
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
5
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
perform gel extraction following the manufacturer’s instructions (Figure 2). Determine the
concentration of acquired DNA using NanoDrop 2000.
Note: For in vitro transcription from plasmid, the plasmid should be linearized with appropriate
restriction enzyme digestion and purified with a commercial kit.
Figure 2. Specific probe DNA (here for Tal1 gene) amplified through PCR.
To determine PCR specificity, the PCR product is subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. A
specific DNA band can be observed, excised, and purified for further usage.
3. Transcription of the DIG probe:
a. Prepare the following reaction system:
Component
For 1 µg DNA
DNA
1 µg
10× transcription buffer
3 µl
DIG-nucleotide mix
2 µl
RiboLock RNase Inhibitor
1 µl
T7 RNA polymerase
2 µl
Water
to 30 µl
Total
30 µl
b. Incubate the reaction at 37°C for 3 h in the thermocycler, with lid temperature no higher than
55°C.
c.
To remove the template DNA, add 0.5 µl DNase I to the reaction mix directly and mix well,
then incubate the mix at 37°C for 15 min.
d. Purify the acquired RNA transcript with MEGAclearTM Kit following the manufacturer’s
instructions or perform phenol:chloroform extraction followed by alcohol precipitation
manually. The RNA probes can be directly dissolved in nuclease free water.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
6
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
C. Sample rehydration, antigen retrieval, and permeabilization
1. Rehydrate the embryos in graded methanol/PTW buffer (see Recipes) (75%, 50%, and 25%
methanol in PTW) for 2-4 min in each concentration, allowing embryos to settle down to the
bottom between changes. Wash embryos with PTW for 10 min twice.
Note: Prepare graded series of methanol buffer right before use.
2. Incubate the embryos in 6% H2O2/PTW solution at RT for 10 min, and then wash twice with
PTW buffer.
3. Dilute proteinase K in PTW buffer at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml proteinase K in the reaction
mix. Remove PTW buffer thoroughly and incubate embryos in 10 µg/ml proteinase K reaction
mix at RT. The reaction duration varies for different embryo stages. To specify, for embryos
ranging from E7.0 to E9.0 embryos, the appropriate reaction duration should be 7-20 min, but
longer times should be pre-tested for more advanced embryos. A pre-experiment for
optimization of the conditions is strongly recommended.
4. Remove proteinase K buffer carefully and rinse with PTW buffer twice.
5. Post-fix the digested embryos in 4% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde fixation mix (see Recipes).
Incubate the embryos for 20-30 min at RT.
6. Remove the fixation buffer, and carefully wash with PTW buffer twice.
D. Hybridization of RNA probes to the embryos
1. Wash the embryos with hybridization solution warmed at 68°C twice; add the hybridization
solution (see Recipes) and allow embryos to equilibrate until they sink to the bottom.
2. Incubate for 2-6 h at 65-72°C. The optimal temperature varies between different RNA probes.
Usually, a 68°C hybridization temperature works for most probes we have tested.
3. Remove the hybridization solution and replace with the probe diluted in hybridization solution
(200-500 ng/ml). Incubate the embryos at their corresponding temperature overnight.
4. Re-collect the probe. Probes in hybridization solution can be re-used 6-8 times. Re-collected
probes can be stored at -20°C for up to two months.
5. Wash embryos with hybridization buffer warmed at 70°C for 30 min three times.
6. Wash embryos with 50% hybridization buffer/50% TBST buffer at 70°C for 20 min.
7. Wash embryos with TBST buffer (see Recipes) on a rocker platform at RT three times.
E. Antibody incubation and digoxygenin detection
1. Prepare blocking buffer (see Recipes) and incubate with embryos for 2-3 h at RT.
2. Prepare antibody incubation reaction solution with 1:2,000 diluted anti-digoxigenin AP antibody
in blocking buffer. Incubate on a rocker platform at 4°C overnight.
3. Discard the antibody solution and wash the embryos with TBST buffer for 30 min three times. If
required, wash the embryos with an extended overnight wash to reduce background signals.
4. Wash the embryos twice with freshly made NTMT buffer (see Recipes).
5. Discard the NTMT buffer and incubate embryos with NBT/BCIP solution (1:50 in NTMT buffer).
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
7
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
6. Observe the signal frequently during the first two hours of NBT/BCIP solution incubation.
Note: Refresh the NBT/BCIP solution if the solution turns red.
7. Stop the reaction by rinsing the embryos in TBST approximately three times until an obvious
signal appears.
8. Fix the embryos in 4% PFA buffer overnight.
9. Transfer the embryos into 50% glycerol/PBS, and record representative images of embryos
samples (Figure 3).
10. The post-fixed embryos can be store at 4°C for more than one year.
Figure 3. Representative images of wholemount mouse early embryo in situ hybridization
results of Tal1 gene.
The images list embryos at E7.0 and E7.5 stages, from which Tal1 starts to be expressed in
extraembryonic mesoderm cells, as indicated by the triangle at E7.0, and peaking at E7.5. Both
embryos were stained with the same probe against the Tal1 transcript. The images were taken
using an Olympus SZX10/16 microscope. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Recipes
1. 4% PFA
4 g of paraformaldehyde in 100 ml of DPBS, thoroughly dissolve.
Adjust pH to 7.4-7.6 using 1 M NaOH solution and store in 4°C for up to one week.
Note: Take care to avoid direct contact with PFA powder and solution.
2. PTW buffer
Calcium and magnesium free DPBS with 0.1% Tween-20.
Store at room temperature for up to one week.
Note: Take care to avoid direct contact with Tween-20 solution due to potential harm to skin.
3. 20 mg/ml Yeast RNA
Dissolve 20 mg of Yeast RNA in 1 ml of nuclease free water and mix thoroughly.
Store at -20°C for up to one month.
4. 50 mg/ml Heparin
Dissolve 50 mg of Heparin in 1 ml of nuclease free water and mix thoroughly.
Store at -20°C for up to one month.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
8
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
5. Hybridization solution
Store at -20°C for up to one month.
Component (stock conc.)
Final conc.
Formamide
50%
SSC (20×, pH 5.3 adjusted with citric acid)
1.3× SSC
Volume to add
25 ml
3.25 ml
EDTA (0.5 M, pH 8.0)
5 mM
0.5 ml
Yeast RNA (20 mg/ml in H2O)
50 µg/ml
125 µl
Tween-20
0.002
100 µl
Heparin (50 mg/ml in H2O)
100 µg/ml
100 µl
UltraPureTM DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water
Total
Replenish to 50 ml
50 ml
6. 10× TBST stock
Store at 4°C for up to one month.
Component
Mass
NaCl
4g
KCl
0.1 g
1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5
12.5 ml
Tween-20
5.5 g
H2O
Replenish to 50 ml
Total
50 ml
7. Blocking buffer
1 mg/ml BSA in 1× TBST
Store at 4°C for up to one week
8. NTMT buffer
Prepare right before use; store at room temperature for up to 2 days.
Component (stock concentration)
Final concentration
Volume to add
2.5 M NaCl
0.1 M
1 ml
2 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.5)
0.1 M
1.25 ml
1 M MgCl2
0.05 M
1.25 ml
Tween-20
1%
0.25 ml
H2O
Total
~21.25 ml
25 ml
9. 4% PFA/0.1% glutaraldehyde
Dilute 25% glutaraldehyde in freshly prepared 4% PFA to a final concentration of 0.1%. Prepare
right before use.
Note: Take care to avoid direct contact with PFA and glutaraldehyde solution.
10. 6% H2O2/PTW solution
Dilute 30% H2O2 stock buffer in freshly prepared PTW buffer to a final concentration of 6%.
Prepare right before use.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
9
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
Note: Take care to avoid direct physical contact with H2O2 solution.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the National Key Basic Research and Development Program of
China
(2018YFA0800100,
2019YFA0801402,
2018YFA0108000,
2018YFA0107200,
2017YFA0102700), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
(XDA16020501 and XDA16020404), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(31900454). This protocol was adapted from Zhu, Q., Song, L., Peng, G., Sun, N., Chen, J., Zhang,
T., Sheng, N., Tang, W., Qian, C., Qiao, Y., et al. (2014). The transcription factor Pou3f1 promotes
neural fate commitment via activation of neural lineage genes and inhibition of external signaling
pathways. Elife 3: e02224.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest or competing interests.
References
1. Downs, K. M. and Davies, T. (1993). Staging of gastrulating mouse embryos by morphological
landmarks in the dissecting microscope. Development 118(4): 1255-1266.
2. Hauptmann, G. and Gerster, T. (1994). Two-color whole-mount in situ hybridization to vertebrate
and Drosophila embryos. Trends Genet 10(8): 266.
3. Nieto, M. A., Patel, K. and Wilkinson, D. G. (1996). In: Methods in Cell Biology. Vol. 51. BronnerFraser, M. (Ed.). 219-235, Academic Press.
4. Peng, G., Suo, S., Chen, J., Chen, W., Liu, C., Yu, F., Wang, R., Chen, S., Sun, N., Cui, G., et
al. (2016). Spatial Transcriptome for the Molecular Annotation of Lineage Fates and Cell Identity
in Mid-gastrula Mouse Embryo. Dev Cell 36(6): 681-697.
5. Peng, G., Suo, S., Cui, G., Yu, F., Wang, R., Chen, J., Chen, S., Liu, Z., Chen, G., Qian, Y.,
Tam, P. P. L., Han, J. J. and Jing, N. (2019). Molecular architecture of lineage allocation and
tissue organization in early mouse embryo. Nature 572(7770): 528-532.
6. Pereira, P. N., Dobreva, M. P., Graham, L., Huylebroeck, D., Lawson, K. A. and Zwijsen, A. N.
(2011). Amnion formation in the mouse embryo: the single amniochorionic fold model. BMC Dev
Biol 11: 48.
7. Piliszek, A., Kwon, G. S. and Hadjantonakis, A. K. (2011). Ex utero culture and live imaging of
mouse embryos. Methods Mol Biol 770: 243-257.
8. Wang, F., Flanagan, J., Su, N., Wang, L. C., Bui, S., Nielson, A., Wu, X., Vo, H. T., Ma, X. J.
and Luo, Y. (2012). RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 14(1): 22-29.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
10
Please cite this article as: Yang, X. et al. (2021). Wholemount in situ Hybridization for Spatial-temporal Visualization of Gene Expression in Early Postimplantation Mouse Embryos. Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229. DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4229.
www.bio-protocol.org/e4229
Bio-protocol 11(22): e4229.
DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.4229
9. Yang, X., Hu, B., Hou, Y., Qiao, Y., Wang, R., Chen, Y., Qian, Y., Feng, S., Chen, J., Liu, C., et
al. (2018). Silencing of developmental genes by H3K27me3 and DNA methylation reflects the
discrepant plasticity of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Cell Res 28(5): 593-596.
10. Yang, X., Hu, B., Liao, J., Qiao, Y., Chen, Y., Qian, Y., Feng, S., Yu, F., Dong, J., Hou, Y., et al.
(2019). Distinct enhancer signatures in the mouse gastrula delineate progressive cell fate
continuum during embryo development. Cell Res 29(11): 911-926.
11. Zhu, Q., Song, L., Peng, G., Sun, N., Chen, J., Zhang, T., Sheng, N., Tang, W., Qian, C., Qiao,
Y., et al. (2014). The transcription factor Pou3f1 promotes neural fate commitment via activation
of neural lineage genes and inhibition of external signaling pathways. Elife 3: e02224.
Copyright Yang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0).
11