A Picture of
Disability and
Designated
Housing
Multi-Disciplinary
Research Team
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and Research
A Picture of Disability and Designated Housing
Multi-Disciplinary Research Team
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Policy Development and Research
March 6, 2015
Submitted by:
Economic Systems Inc.
Falls Church, Virginia
Prepared by:
Casey J. Dawkins, Ph.D., and Mark Miller
National Center for Smart Growth
University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
About MDRT
PD&R developed the Multidisciplinary Research Team (MDRT) vehicle to manage a
team of qualified researchers. Researchers are selected for their expertise to produce an
array of high quality, short-turnaround research. MDRT researchers use a variety of HUD
and external data sources to answer research questions relating to HUD’s priority policies
and strategic goals.
Disclaimer
The contents of this report are the views of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect
the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the
U.S. government.
Table of Contents
Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................................. 3
Background: HUD Programs Serving the Needs of the Disabled .................................................. 4
Defining Disability................................................................................................................ 5
Data and Research Methods............................................................................................................ 6
Prevalence of Disabilities in the U.S. and in HUD Programs ........................................................ 7
Availability of Assisted HUD Units in Relation to Need ............................................................. 17
Supply of and Demand for Accessible Assisted Units ....................................................... 20
Conclusions and Policy Implications ............................................................................................ 26
References ..................................................................................................................................... 29
Appendix A. Explanation of data products ................................................................................... 30
Data products derived from public summary files .............................................................. 30
Data products derived from HUD administrative data ....................................................... 32
Public Housing Statistics .................................................................................................... 36
Multifamily Assisted Program Statistics ............................................................................ 37
Assisted Unit Count ............................................................................................................ 39
Supply and Demand Statistics ............................................................................................ 39
Appendix B. Variable Codebook .................................................................................................. 42
List of Tables
Table 1: Disabled persons per 1,000 occupied housing units by sex and age category ........... 8
Table 2: Disabled and nondisabled persons per 1000 occupied housing units by age, poverty
status, and geography ...................................................................................................................... 9
Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure
status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands).......................................... 10
Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability,
tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI ...................................................... 12
Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age ........... 14
Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per
1000 HUD-assisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) ................................. 16
i
Table 7: Summary statistics, among HUD-assisted households in public housing ................ 18
Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics .................................................................................. 19
Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households
....................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled
households, by quartile using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) .... 23
ii
Introduction and Overview
This report examines the characteristics of federally-assisted housing designated for disabled
households living in the U.S. Prior research suggests that disabled persons face significant
challenges when trying to secure affordable, high quality housing. The 2009 “Worst Case
Housing Needs of People with Disabilities” report (Souza et al. 2011) finds that renter
households with nonelderly disabled members are more likely than nondisabled households to
have very low incomes, experience worst case housing needs, pay more than 50 percent of their
income on rent, and live in inadequate or overcrowded housing. The inadequate housing
conditions of the disabled reflects both the relatively lower incomes and assets of disabled
persons (She and Livermore 2009) combined with the lack of available housing with
accessibility features. Hoffman and Livermore (2012) find that disabled persons also tend to live
in less desirable neighborhoods than non-disabled persons. Such neighborhoods exhibit lower
median incomes, lower fair market rents, poorer access to public services, and more
neighborhood problems such as crime and heavy street noise.
Due to their lower incomes, a significant share of disabled households are eligible to receive or
already receive federal housing assistance from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD). According to the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households
(http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/picture/yearlydata.html), approximately 20 percent of
households receiving assistance from HUD are disabled. Among those with household heads
aged 62 or older, this percentage is twice as high (40 percent) and exhibits substantial variability
across HUD program type. Given that the prevalence of disability within the U.S. is expected to
increase over time with the aging of the baby boomer population, it is important to understand
whether HUD’s assisted housing programs adequately address the growing needs of this
population. This report sheds light on these issues. The objective of this research is to
consolidate administrative data and survey data related to households with disabilities and
designated housing in a form similar to the Picture of Subsidized Households, which presents
information on HUD program participants by various levels of geography. We use these data to
address the following research questions:
In HUD housing programs and the broader population, what are the prevalence and
characteristics of households containing one or more persons with disabilities, by type of
disability and geographic unit?
What is the availability of assisted units that the public housing authority or
owner/managing agent has designated as accessible, in relation to the need at different
geographic levels?
What policy recommendations are supported by the evidence on disability and designated
units, and how should HUD data resources be revised to address future questions
pertaining to disability?
This report is structured as follows: The background section gives an overview of the major
HUD programs designed to serve the needs of the disabled population. Next, we provide a brief
description of the data relied upon for the analyses and research methods employed. The main
3
body of the report addresses the research questions posed above, with policy recommendations
addressed in the conclusion section. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the methods
and assumptions used to assemble the data analyzed in this report, and Appendix B provides a
description of all variables assembled for the final analytical dataset (provided as a separate
Excel file).
Background: HUD Programs Serving the Needs of the Disabled
We begin with an overview of HUD programs serving the disabled, followed by a discussion of
how “disability” is defined in this report. All of HUD’s programs serve a portion of the disabled
population. According to the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households, households with
disabilities are most prevalent, 32 percent, in the Moderate Rehabilitation program,1 followed by
the Housing Choice Voucher program, the Section 8 New Construction/Substantial
Rehabilitation program, and the public housing program. The smallest percentages of disabled
persons are served by the Section 236 and other multifamily programs.
The Section 202 and Section 811 programs are the largest and longest standing programs
targeted specifically to the needs of disabled persons. Section 202 was created in 1959 to house
low income elderly persons aged 62 and older. The program provides low interest loans (and
later project-based Section 8 rental assistance contracts) to nonprofit developers seeking to
construct housing for families with elderly members. In 1964, handicapped persons were added
to the definition of eligible elderly families. Until 1990, Section 202 served the needs of both
elderly and disabled populations, although a separate set-aside was established in 1978 to focus
specifically on the needs of nonelderly disabled individuals. That set-aside was expanded into the
newly-created Section 811 program in 1990 to focus specifically on the needs of nonelderly
disabled persons between 18 and 61. The funding mechanism also changed to emphasize capital
grants rather than loans. The 2010 Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act changed
the manner in which Section 811 project rental assistance contracts (PRAC) could be used.
Previously, these subsidies could only be tied to units developed using Section 811 capital
grants. With the 2010 changes, PRACs could be used to subsidize multifamily units developed
using other sources, including the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, HOME funds, and other
sources. Programmatic changes were also implemented to encourage the integration of disabled
households into the larger community. After 2010, disabled households living in multifamily
units developed using Section 811 could only constitute 25 percent of the total number of units in
the building (Perl 2013; Schwartz 2015).
Disabled households may also qualify for tenant-based rental assistance. Under the Section 811
program, “mainstream” vouchers were created in 1992 to serve the needs of disabled households
seeking housing in the private market. The funding for the mainstream voucher program was
eventually absorbed by the Section 8 tenant-based voucher program. Beginning in 2005, HUD
1
Although the Moderate Rehabilitation program serves the highest percent of disabled households, this program
serves few households compared to other HUD programs, so the total number of disabled persons served is quite
small.
4
required voucher-administering agencies to help participants of the program find supportive
services and provide assistance to landlords in making reasonable accommodations to serve the
needs of disabled mainstream voucher holders. No new vouchers have been issued under this
program since 2006. The Section 8 (now Housing Choice Voucher) program also provides
tenant-based rental assistance targeted directly to families with a disabled adult in the household.
These are often referred to as “designated” vouchers or vouchers for “certain developments.”
Beginning with the 2010 Frank Melville Act, all mainstream and designated vouchers were to be
made available to other disabled households upon turnover (Devine 2000; Perl 2013; Schwartz
2015).
An important policy question of interest is the extent to which disabled households participate in
programs specifically targeted to the disabled versus participating in other HUD programs. Since
programs targeted to the disabled are often combined with supportive services, physical
accommodations, and technical assistance to landlords for accommodating disability needs,
participants in targeted HUD programs likely receive more accommodations than other HUD
program participants. We address this issue later in the report.
Defining Disability
Although the HUD definition of disability has varied over time and across program category, our
report relies on data from HUD’s most recent administrative records to characterize the disabled
population and make comparisons with the characteristics of the larger disabled population living
in the U.S. Varying definitions of disability across the two populations make such comparisons
challenging. For the population at large, the American Community Survey includes questions
about disability status. This report defines disability for the larger population based on the
current definition first introduced in 2008. According to the U.S. Census, disabled persons are
those exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics
(https://www.census.gov/people/disability/methodology/acs.html):
Sensory Disability – Conditions that include blindness, deafness, or a severe vision or
hearing impairment.
Physical Disability – Conditions that substantially limit one or more basic physical
activities such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying.
Mental Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6
months or more, the person has difficulty learning, remembering or concentrating.
Self-care Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6
months or more, the person has difficulty dressing, bathing, or getting around inside the
home.
Go-outside-home Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition
lasting 6 months or more, the person has difficulty going outside the home alone to shop
or visit a doctor's office.
Employment Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6
months or more, the person has difficulty working at a job or business.
5
Most of HUD’s programs, on the other hand, do not distinguish among type of disability,
although housing providers are to use the following criteria to identify disabled persons when
reporting to HUD’s tenant-level administrative data systems:2
A disability as defined in section 223 of the Social Security Act.
A physical, mental, or emotional impairment, which is expected to be of long-continued
and indefinite duration, substantially impedes his or her ability to live independently, and
is of such a nature that such ability could be improved by more suitable housing
conditions.
A developmental disability as defined in section 102 of the Developmental Disabilities
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act.
Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or any condition that arises from the
etiologic agent for AIDS.
Since disability is often under-reported, we also include in our definition of the disabled HUDassisted population all those who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a federal income
supplement designed to meet the needs of low-income disabled persons. We also present data
using two indicators that provide additional information on the appropriateness of accessibility
features for a person’s disability needs: (1) public housing residents may request disability
features, and HUD’s tenant-level data identify whether these features are requested by and
provided to public housing residents; (2) Several multi-family properties are specifically
designed to meet the needs of specific types of disabilities experienced by HUD-assisted
households. We report information describing both of these conditions to gain a better
understanding of the match between disabled household needs and the accessibility
characteristics of HUD units.
Data and Research Methods
Our analyses in this report consist primarily of various descriptive statistics for disabled
households both within the U.S. at large and for U.S. households receiving HUD assistance.
Where possible, we emphasize comparisons between these two groups. For all households, we
present information for the U.S., for each Census region, and for central, outlying, and rural
counties.3 Each table primarily presents information for either (1) the number of disabled
persons per household, or (2) the number/percent of households containing disabled persons,
depending on which is more appropriate. At the end of the report, we also present various
2
The HUD tenant-level data utilized for this project include data reported on the HUD-50058 form (completed by
PHAs for each assisted household participating in PHA-administered programs as reported in the Public and Indian
Housing Information Center (PIC) data) and HUD-50059 form (completed by private housing providers for assisted
households participating in HUD Office of Housing-administered “multifamily” programs as reported in the Tenant
Rental Assistance Certification System (TRACS) data).
Throughout the report, “central counties” refer to all counties within 2013 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs)
that contain the largest portion of the CBSA’s urbanized area; “outlying” counties include all other counties within
the CBSA; and “rural” counties include counties outside of 2013 CBSAs.
3
6
measures of the supply and demand for disabled housing units, which we describe in sections to
follow. Statistics presented for HUD-assisted households are further disaggregated by program
type and PHA size.
Data sources for statistics presented to describe disabled households in the U.S. include the most
recently available American Community Survey (ACS) 2009-2013 5-year sample and the most
recently available HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) sample (20082010 3-year sample and 2006-2010 5-year sample, depending on the availability of the data
being examined). The data used to describe HUD-assisted households living in the U.S. are
constructed from HUD administrative databases, including HUD’s 2013 longitudinal household
and member files (PIC and TRACS) and the Integrated Real Estate Management System
(iREMs) multifamily property database. We match the household-level files to iREMS to
characterize the units and properties where disabled persons reside.
Prevalence of Disabilities in the U.S. and in HUD Programs
Research Question: In HUD housing programs and the broader population, what are the
prevalence and characteristics of households containing one or more persons with disabilities,
by type of disability and geographic unit?
We begin with an examination of the prevalence of disability among all U.S. households, using
data from the 2009-2013 ACS. Table 1 displays the number of disabled persons per 1000
households by sex and age category. Table 1 and the following tables also display the total
number of HUD-assisted units. We present the information for the U.S.; all major Census
regions; and for central counties, outlying counties and rural counties.
In the U.S. population at large, there are roughly 322 disabled persons per 1000 households.4 The
ratio of disabled persons to households varies somewhat by Census region, with the highest
number found in the South and the lowest in the Northeast. Comparing central, outlying and
rural counties, we find that the ratio is highest in rural areas and lowest in more urban, central
counties.
Table 1 shows that of the 322 disabled persons per 1000 households, 167 are female and 154 are
male. Breaking down the results by age in addition to sex reveals that below age 18, more of the
disabled individuals are male rather than female (16 versus 10); for ages 18–64, male and female
shares are equal (84 versus 84); and above age 65, a greater share are female (54 males versus 74
females). As before, disabled persons of both sexes are more commonly found among
households in the South and in rural areas.
Ratios of disabled persons per 1000 households are affected by both the size of the age
subgroups and the prevalence of disabilities among individuals of those subgroups. Senior
individuals are most likely to have a disability, yet the working-age population (age 18-64)
4
Limitations of the data make it difficult to estimate the proportion of households that contain at least one
disabled person without double-counting. Tables 3 and 4 indicate the proportion of households having individuals
with specific disabilities.
7
accounts for 168 of the 322 disabled persons per 1000 households. Seniors are next with 128
disabled persons, and children account for a much smaller share, 26 disabled persons. This
pattern holds for all geographic areas. For all age groups regardless of sex, the ratio of disabled
persons to households is highest in the South and in rural areas, although less variable across
regions compared with the household population at large.
Table 1: Disabled persons per 1,000 occupied housing units by sex and age category
Northeast M idwest
Region
Region
300
309
24
26
150
162
125
121
2,309
2,229
556
586
1,511
1,423
242
221
South
Region
349
28
186
135
2,300
619
1,464
217
West
Region
305
23
157
125
2,497
674
1,604
219
Central
counties
309
25
161
123
2,353
616
1,517
220
Outlying
counties
367
30
197
140
2,291
623
1,439
229
Rural
counties
435
29
226
179
2,057
550
1,249
258
Total Disabled
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
Total Non-Disabled
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
U.S.
322
26
168
128
2,329
612
1,494
223
Disabled M ales
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
Non-Disabled M ales
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
154
16
84
54
1,140
310
731
99
139
15
74
50
1,124
281
736
107
150
16
82
52
1,094
296
700
97
167
17
92
57
1,118
313
708
97
149
15
80
54
1,236
342
795
100
147
16
80
51
1,151
312
741
98
181
19
100
63
1,125
315
705
104
221
18
118
84
1,011
279
616
116
Disabled Females
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
Non-Disabled Females
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65+
167
10
84
74
1,189
302
764
123
161
9
77
75
1,185
275
775
136
159
9
80
69
1,135
290
722
123
182
11
94
78
1,182
306
756
120
157
9
77
71
1,260
332
810
119
163
9
81
72
1,202
304
776
122
185
11
97
77
1,167
307
734
125
214
11
108
95
1,046
271
633
142
Total HUD assisted
units (thousands)
4,619
1,240
970
1,488
801
4,179
203
217
Source: American Community Survey, 5-year sample, 2009-2013; HUD longitudinal data from the TRACS system
and public housing databases (form 50058 and the M TW program), 2013, household and member files.
Table 2 displays estimates of disabled and non-disabled persons per 1,000 households by age and
poverty status. Non-poor households contribute the majority, 249, of the 320 disabled individuals
per 1,000 households. Yet disability is more prevalent among the poor: 17.6 percent of
individuals in poor households are disabled, compared with only 11.2 percent of individuals in
non-poor households. The primary reason that non-poor households contribute most disabled
individuals is that non-poor households represent 84.6 percent of the population. In addition, the
disabled poor population includes a larger number of elderly disabled persons living in singleperson households. In fact, we find that 51.5 percent of elderly persons in poor households have
disabilities, compared with only 35.0 percent of elderly persons in non-poor households.
8
Table 2: Disabled and nondisabled persons per 1000 occupied housing units by age, poverty status, and
geography5
Total
Total Disabled
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
Total Non-Disabled
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
Total Below Age 18
Total Disabled Below Age 18
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
Total Non-Disabled Below Age
18
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
U.S.
2,620
320
71
249
2,300
332
1,968
Northeast M idwest
Region
Region
2,568
2,505
298
308
64
68
234
240
2,270
2,197
270
297
2,000
1,900
South
Region
2,621
348
81
267
2,274
363
1,910
West
Region
2,779
304
63
241
2,474
368
2,106
Central
counties
2,630
308
68
240
2,322
335
1,987
Outlying
Rural
counties counties
2,631
2,471
365
434
77
109
289
325
2,266
2,037
290
345
1,975
1,692
629
25
8
17
573
24
7
16
602
25
8
17
639
27
10
18
687
23
7
16
633
25
8
17
643
29
9
20
569
29
11
17
604
549
577
611
665
608
614
541
128
477
97
452
114
463
144
467
139
526
128
480
116
499
140
401
Total Age 18-64
Total Disabled Age 18-64
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
Total Non-Disabled Age 18-64
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
1,640
167
46
121
1,473
189
1,285
1,627
149
41
108
1,478
156
1,323
1,561
161
46
115
1,399
170
1,230
1,631
186
52
133
1,446
202
1,244
1,747
156
41
116
1,591
213
1,378
1,655
160
44
116
1,495
191
1,303
1,618
196
50
146
1,422
160
1,263
1,464
226
70
156
1,238
182
1,056
Total Age 65 And Above
Total Disabled Age 65 And
Above
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
Total Non-Disabled Age 65
And Above
In Poverty
Not In Poverty
351
368
342
352
344
343
369
437
128
125
121
135
125
123
140
179
17
111
16
109
14
107
19
116
15
110
16
107
17
123
28
152
223
242
221
217
219
220
229
258
16
206
17
225
14
207
18
199
16
203
16
204
15
214
23
236
4,619
1,240
970
1,488
801
4,179
203
217
Total HUD assisted units
(thousands)
Source: American Community Survey, 5-year sample, 2009-2013; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013,
household and member files
5
The totals in this table represent persons for whom poverty information is available and do not precisely match
the totals from Table 1.
9
Tables 3 and 4 use CHAS data to examine the number and proportion of households that include
persons with specific types of disabilities by tenure status and household income as a percent of
HUD-Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI). HUD categorizes incomes up to 30 percent of
HAMFI as extremely low income, up to 50 percent of HAMFI as very low income, up to 80
percent of HAMFI as low-income, and greater than 80 percent of HAMFI as moderate income or
higher. Totals are displayed in Table 3, and percentages of households within each row are
displayed in Table 4. Because the total number of households varies for each category, we focus
our interpretation on the percentages displayed in Table 4.
For each disability type, the prevalence of disability is highest among households with the lowest
incomes (Table 4). Generally, the percentage of households with hearing or vision impairments
is largest in the South and in rural areas, but some differences emerge when we consider
different types of disability. Among all households, the percentage of households with members
that experience cognitive and self-care or independent living limitations is highest in the South.
Interestingly, the geographic distribution of all types of disabilities varies when we consider
renter households only. For these households, all types of disability are more prevalent in the
Midwest than in other Census regions.
Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and
household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands)
U.S.
Northeast M idwest
Region
Region
South
Region
West
Region
Central
counties
Outlying
counties
Rural
counties
Tenure: All
114,597
20,964
25,968
42,377
25,288
99,954
7,112
3,824
Hearing or vision impairment
12,680
2,099
2,784
5,077
2,720
10,594
901
626
≤ 30% HAM FI
2,143
446
439
811
447
1,849
135
92
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
2,099
361
473
839
426
1,734
148
112
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
2,489
385
583
991
530
2,050
184
134
income
> 80% HAM FI
5,949
907
1,289
2,435
1,317
4,961
434
288
Ambulatory limitation
16,241
2,803
3,506
6,709
3,224
13,644
1,140
793
≤ 30% HAM FI
3,492
763
727
1,319
683
3,004
219
145
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
2,986
520
669
1,233
564
2,466
211
162
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
3,192
498
738
1,330
626
2,641
233
173
income
> 80% HAM FI
6,571
1,021
1,372
2,827
1,351
5,533
477
315
Cognitive limitation
9,605
1,676
2,124
3,866
1,940
8,172
669
445
≤ 30% HAM FI
2,461
528
545
901
486
2,144
152
101
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
1,864
313
414
766
371
1,567
128
94
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
1,070
162
263
463
182
859
85
66
income
> 80% HAM FI
4,211
673
902
1,735
901
3,602
304
183
Self-care or independent living
12,148
2,172
2,626
4,853
2,497
10,380
818
549
limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
2,708
592
572
988
555
2,357
166
104
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
2,222
395
495
898
434
1,864
151
113
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
2,356
378
540
959
479
1,982
167
119
income
> 80% HAM FI
4,862
807
1,019
2,008
1,028
4,176
334
213
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; HUD longitudinal data
from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
10
Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and
household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands) (continued)
Tenure: Renters
Hearing or vision impairment
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Ambulatory limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Cognitive limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Self-care or independent living
limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Tenure: Owners
Hearing or vision impairment
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Ambulatory limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Cognitive limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Self-care or independent living
limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
U.S.
39,039
3,852
1,299
879
737
936
5,667
2,220
1,318
1,004
1,125
4,266
1,728
959
761
818
Northeast M idwest South
Region
Region Region
7,678
7,747
13,759
744
793
1,399
306
268
439
165
196
321
125
161
273
149
169
366
1,176
1,208
2,045
552
471
743
256
301
483
176
224
377
192
213
441
839
932
1,527
411
391
570
174
218
355
126
165
286
128
158
317
West
Region
9,855
916
286
198
179
253
1,238
454
278
228
279
968
356
213
183
216
Central
counties
35,420
3,372
1,157
752
640
823
4,958
1,965
1,128
872
994
3,758
1,540
829
665
724
Outlying
counties
1,808
215
66
52
43
54
312
116
77
57
62
238
92
55
44
48
Rural
counties
938
140
43
37
30
31
209
73
57
41
38
153
58
39
29
27
4,321
889
929
1,503
1,000
3,813
230
148
1,751
1,001
753
817
428
194
131
137
379
227
167
156
562
356
273
311
382
224
182
212
1,561
864
660
728
89
57
40
43
53
40
29
27
75,558
8,828
844
1,219
1,752
5,013
10,574
1,271
1,667
2,188
5,447
5,339
733
904
309
3,392
13,286
1,355
140
196
260
759
1,626
211
263
322
829
838
117
139
36
545
18,220
1,991
171
277
423
1,121
2,297
256
368
514
1,159
1,192
153
197
98
744
28,618
3,677
372
518
718
2,069
4,664
576
749
953
2,387
2,338
331
411
177
1,419
15,434
1,804
161
229
351
1,064
1,986
229
286
399
1,072
971
130
158
-2
685
64,534
7,222
691
982
1,411
4,138
8,685
1,039
1,338
1,769
4,539
4,414
605
738
193
2,878
5,304
686
69
96
141
380
828
103
133
176
415
430
60
73
41
256
2,885
486
49
75
104
258
585
72
105
132
277
292
43
55
38
156
7,827
1,283
1,697
3,350
1,498
6,567
588
401
957
1,221
1,604
4,045
164
201
247
670
193
268
373
863
426
542
685
1,696
174
210
298
816
795
1,001
1,322
3,448
77
94
127
290
52
73
90
186
Total HUD assisted units
4,619
1,240
970
1,488
801
4,179
203
217
(thousands)
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; HUD longitudinal data
from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
11
Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status,
and household income as a percent of HAMFI
U.S.
Tenure: All
Hearing or vision impairment
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Ambulatory limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Cognitive limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Self-care or independent living
limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Tenure: Renters
Hearing or vision impairment
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Ambulatory limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Cognitive limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Self-care or independent living
limitation
Northeast M idwest South
Region
Region Region
West Central Outlying Rural
Region counties counties counties
11.1
15.0
15.8
13.3
8.8
14.2
24.4
22.4
17.0
9.7
8.4
17.2
14.0
5.7
6.2
10.0
14.9
14.6
11.9
7.4
13.4
25.6
21.0
15.5
8.3
8.0
17.7
12.7
5.0
5.5
10.7
14.4
16.1
13.2
8.3
13.5
23.9
22.8
16.6
8.8
8.2
17.9
14.1
5.9
5.8
12.0
15.8
17.0
14.4
9.7
15.9
25.7
24.9
19.3
11.2
9.2
17.6
15.5
6.7
6.9
10.8
14.2
14.4
12.5
8.9
12.8
21.6
19.1
14.8
9.1
7.7
15.4
12.5
4.3
6.1
10.6
14.5
15.1
12.6
8.4
13.7
23.6
21.4
16.3
9.3
8.2
16.9
13.6
5.3
6.1
12.8
17.3
18.4
15.7
10.1
16.2
28.0
26.3
19.8
11.1
9.5
19.4
16.0
7.2
7.1
16.3
20.0
22.2
19.5
13.2
20.7
31.6
32.1
25.1
14.4
11.6
22.1
18.7
9.7
8.4
10.6
18.9
16.7
12.6
7.2
10.4
19.8
16.0
11.7
6.6
10.1
18.8
16.9
12.2
6.6
11.5
19.3
18.2
13.9
8.0
9.9
17.6
14.7
11.3
6.9
10.4
18.5
16.2
12.2
7.1
11.6
21.2
18.8
14.2
7.8
14.3
22.8
22.4
17.3
9.8
10.1
13.7
12.8
9.4
6.7
14.9
23.4
19.1
12.8
8.1
11.2
18.2
13.9
9.7
5.9
9.9
14.4
12.4
8.9
5.5
15.6
25.9
19.3
12.5
7.1
11.1
19.3
13.1
9.0
4.8
10.5
13.3
13.5
9.8
6.9
15.9
23.3
20.7
13.6
8.7
12.3
19.3
15.0
10.0
6.4
10.4
13.9
13.3
9.8
7.2
15.2
23.5
20.1
13.5
8.7
11.4
18.0
14.7
10.3
6.3
9.5
13.1
11.6
8.9
6.8
12.9
20.8
16.3
11.3
7.5
10.1
16.3
12.5
9.1
5.8
9.7
13.4
12.2
9.0
6.5
14.3
22.7
18.3
12.3
7.8
10.9
17.8
13.4
9.4
5.7
12.3
15.2
15.6
11.4
8.9
17.8
26.8
23.0
15.1
10.2
13.6
21.1
16.4
11.6
7.9
15.2
18.2
19.4
15.2
10.1
22.6
31.2
29.6
20.9
12.6
16.5
24.7
20.6
14.6
8.9
11.3
11.8
12.3
11.2
10.4
11.0
13.1
16.1
≤ 30% HAM FI
18.4
20.1
18.7
17.8
17.5
18.0
20.6
22.5
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
14.5
14.6
15.6
14.8
13.2
14.0
17.1
20.8
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
9.6
9.3
10.1
9.8
9.0
9.3
10.6
14.8
income
> 80% HAM FI
5.9
5.1
6.4
6.2
5.7
5.7
7.1
8.9
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
12
Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status,
and household income as a percent of HAMFI (continued)
U.S.
Tenure: Owners
Hearing or vision impairment
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Ambulatory limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Cognitive limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Self-care or independent living
limitation
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Northeast M idwest South
Region
Region Region
West Central Outlying Rural
Region counties counties counties
11.6
17.5
19.0
16.0
9.3
13.9
26.4
26.0
20.0
10.1
7.0
15.2
14.1
2.8
6.3
10.1
16.4
17.1
14.3
7.9
12.2
24.6
23.0
17.7
8.7
6.3
13.7
12.1
2.0
5.7
10.8
16.8
18.7
15.2
8.6
12.5
25.1
24.8
18.5
8.8
6.5
15.0
13.3
3.5
5.7
12.8
18.9
20.4
17.5
10.3
16.2
29.2
29.6
23.2
11.9
8.1
16.8
16.2
4.3
7.0
11.6
16.6
18.3
15.8
9.5
12.7
23.6
22.8
18.0
9.6
6.2
13.4
12.6
-0.1
6.1
11.1
17.0
18.4
15.5
8.9
13.4
25.6
25.1
19.4
9.8
6.8
14.9
13.9
2.1
6.2
12.9
19.9
20.5
17.7
10.3
15.6
29.4
28.6
22.0
11.3
8.1
17.2
15.7
5.2
6.9
16.7
21.9
24.0
21.3
13.7
20.1
32.1
33.7
26.8
14.7
10.0
19.5
17.5
7.7
8.3
10.3
19.9
19.0
14.7
7.5
9.6
19.1
17.6
13.6
7.0
9.2
19.0
18.1
13.4
6.6
11.7
21.7
21.4
16.7
8.4
9.6
17.9
16.8
13.4
7.3
10.1
19.6
18.8
14.5
7.4
11.1
22.1
20.1
15.9
7.9
13.8
23.2
23.4
18.2
9.9
Total HUD assisted units
4,619
1,240
970 1,488
801
4,179
203
217
(thousands)
Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
Turning now to HUD-assisted households, Table 5 displays the number of disabled persons per
1,000 HUD-assisted units, broken down by sex, age, geographic area, Public Housing Agency
(PHA) size, and HUD program type. In contrast to the results for all U.S. households, there are
more disabled persons per HUD-assisted household in the West and in central counties. Large
PHAs are also likely to serve larger numbers of disabled persons. Interestingly, regional
variations fluctuate with the age of disabled household members, with greater ratios of young
disabled household members (age <18) found in the South, and greater ratios of working-aged
and elderly disabled household members found in the West. We also find greater ratios of
working-aged disabled persons in rural counties.
There are many more disabled females per 1,000 HUD-assisted households than there are
disabled males. This partly reflects the prevalence of female-headed households in the larger
population of HUD-assisted households (77 percent of HUD-assisted households, according to
the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households). Ratios of disabled females are greater in outlying
counties, particularly among those of working age. For both males and females, ratios of
disabled children and disabled elderly persons are greater in the South.
13
Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age
Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large
Region
Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs
434
385
387
465
408
403
404
401
452
509
39
29
41
29
36
25
19
15
24
50
289
299
275
311
284
308
313
296
336
332
106
57
71
126
87
69
73
89
91
126
Total disabled persons
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
U.S.
407
35
286
86
Total disabled males
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
153
23
105
25
163
26
106
31
150
19
114
17
140
27
94
19
183
18
123
41
154
24
105
26
144
17
109
18
151
12
118
21
152
10
114
28
164
15
123
26
187
33
117
37
Total disabled females
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
254
12
181
60
272
13
183
75
236
10
185
40
248
14
181
52
282
10
188
85
254
13
180
61
259
9
199
51
253
7
194
52
249
6
182
61
288
9
213
65
322
17
215
89
4,619
1,240
970
1,488
801
4,179
203
217
60
Total HUD assisted
units (thousands)
316 2,854
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age (continued)
Housing Choice
Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice
Public
Vouchers: TenantVouchers:
Vouchers:
Vouchers:
Vouchers:
Housing Based and All Other
"Designated"
M ainstream
Project-Based Homeownership
Total disabled persons
428
524
1,077
1,113
491
552
Below Age 18
29
58
39
27
23
63
Age 18-64
280
343
950
870
325
410
Age 65 and above
120
123
88
216
143
78
Total disabled males
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
169
19
111
40
184
38
112
33
388
25
337
26
406
16
328
62
220
14
153
53
200
39
138
24
Total disabled females
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
259
10
169
80
340
20
230
90
689
14
614
62
707
11
543
154
271
9
172
90
352
24
273
55
1,072
2,019
43
9
55
10
Total HUD assisted
units (thousands)
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
14
Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age (continued)
All Housing
M ultifamily
Choice
Assisted Programs
Section 8
All
Voucher
Breaking Out
M oderate
M ultifamily
Programs Rehabilitation Section 202 Section 811 Section 236
Section 8
Programs
Total disabled persons
537
500
109
843
158
193
186
Below Age 18
56
15
0
2
11
8
7
Age 18-64
357
370
108
841
146
185
180
Age 65 and above
123
114
0
1
0
0
0
Total disabled males
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
190
37
119
34
277
10
211
55
54
0
54
0
464
1
463
0
64
7
57
0
80
5
75
0
82
4
77
0
Total disabled females
Below Age 18
Age 18-64
Age 65 and above
347
20
238
89
223
5
159
59
54
0
54
0
379
1
378
0
94
4
90
0
113
3
110
0
105
2
102
0
2136
34
271
164
911
1377
Total HUD assisted
units (thousands)
31
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
When we examine the prevalence of disabled persons by HUD program, we find that it is highest
in the mainstream voucher program, which is somewhat expected given that this program is
specifically targeted to households with disabled persons. Considering programs not targeted to
the needs of the disabled, the prevalence of disabled persons is highest in the Housing Choice
Voucher program. Since there are no special accommodations to ensure that these households
receive necessary disability accommodations, this is potentially a source of concern. These
results generally hold true regardless of the age or sex of disabled persons.
Table 6 displays the number of households containing at least one disabled person per 1000
HUD-assisted units by income as a percent of HAMFI. As might be expected, the prevalence of
disability is highest for the lowest income households, regardless of geographic location or PHA
size. Disabled households with the lowest incomes, which are especially likely to include nonwage sources of income, are most prevalent in Northeastern and rural counties, while those with
higher incomes are more prevalent in outlying Western counties and in medium-sized PHAs.
Interestingly, while the prevalence of disability in the Section 811 program is higher for higher
income households, for all other HUD programs, disabled households are more prevalent among
lower income categories. Again, the Housing Choice Voucher program serves a larger proportion
of disabled persons than other HUD programs not geared towards the needs of the disabled,
regardless of income.
15
Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI)
U.S.
Total
Household
income ≤30%
HAM FI
Household
income <30%,
≤ 50% HAM FI
Household
income >50%,
≤80% HAM FI
Household
income ≥80%
HAM FI
Total HUD
assisted units
(thousands)
Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large
Region
Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs
416.75
433.44
411.34
405.70 457.76 416.25
424.11
431.92 398.02 447.72 472.54
440.63
478.47
436.87
418.57 472.45 440.47
440.25
453.00 449.96 469.59 495.55
368.91
334.00
354.61
388.45 422.30 364.91
395.87
411.02 363.32 433.29 435.16
261.54
222.36
250.52
298.65 305.58 258.45
300.12
287.64 254.76 314.05 287.68
201.83
174.00
199.10
250.84 247.32 197.68
255.71
233.41 195.63 247.37 205.81
4,619
1,240
970
1,488
801
4,179
203
217
60
316
2,854
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) (continued)
Total
Household
income ≤30%
HAM FI
Household
income <30%,
≤ 50% HAM FI
Household
income >50%,
≤80% HAM FI
Household
income ≥80%
HAM FI
Total HUD
assisted units
(thousands)
Public
Housing
412.01
Housing Choice
Vouchers: TenantBased and All Other
484.19
Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice
Vouchers:
Vouchers:
Vouchers:
Vouchers:
"Designated"
M ainstream
Project-Based Homeownership
980.58
999.55
483.50
484.92
440.21
503.82
982.07
999.44
514.19
643.44
382.38
446.71
975.94
1000.00
392.68
437.59
270.09
304.73
948.07
1000.00
289.44
250.43
204.12
238.48
925.93
1000.00
195.12
224.49
1,072
2,019
43
9
55
10
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
16
Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) (continued)
Total
Household
income ≤30%
HAM FI
Household
income <30%,
≤ 50% HAM FI
Household
income >50%,
≤80% HAM FI
Household
income ≥80%
HAM FI
Total HUD
assisted units
(thousands)
All Housing
Section 8
Choice Voucher M oderate
Programs
Rehabilitation
496.39
491.50
Section
202
204.46
M ultifamily Assisted
Section Section Programs Breaking Out
Section 8
811
236
986.30 255.24
305.85
All
M ultifamily
Programs
295.02
517.03
502.03
233.06
986.26 277.97
324.26
318.55
456.52
408.76
143.35
986.96 216.08
257.98
236.34
309.43
234.50
142.62
981.57 125.61
182.02
171.64
242.12
277.78
148.33 1,000.00
76.74
118.69
110.18
2,136
34
1640
911
1,377
271
31
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
Availability of Assisted HUD Units in Relation to Need
Research Question: What is the availability of assisted units that the public housing authority or
owner/managing agent has designated as accessible, in relation to the need at different
geographic levels?
Table 7 presents various statistics for those participating in the public housing program. Within
this program, the number of disabled persons per 1000 public housing units is highest in central
Northeastern counties managed by large PHAs. Roughly 41 percent of public housing units
contain at least one disabled person, and this percentage varies little across geographic area. The
third row from the bottom presents the percentage of households with at least one disabled
person which requested disability features and ultimately received them in their public housing
unit. Only 30 percent of households with at least one disabled person requesting such amenities
actually received them. This percentage is highest in the West, where 77 percent of those
requesting disability features received them, and lowest in the South, where only 11 percent of
those requesting disability features received them. Central counties and large PHAs are the most
successful in matching disabled households with their requested accommodations. Looking at the
second to last row in Table 7, we find that a surprisingly low percentage (3 percent) of disabled
households living in public housing were actually reported as receiving units with accessibility
features, regardless of whether accessible units were requested. The highest percentages are in
outlying Western counties and in large PHAs.
17
Table 7: Summary statistics, among HUD-assisted households in public housing
U.S.
Number of disabled persons per
1000 public housing households
Percent of households with at
least one disabled person
Percent of households, among
those which requested disability
features, with at least one
disabled person
Percent of households, among
those which received disability
features, with at least one
disabled person
Percent of households, among
those 1) with at least one
disabled person and 2) which
requested disability features,
which ultimately received them
Percent of households, among
those 1) with no disabled
persons and 2) which requested
disability features, which
ultimately received them
Percent of households, among
those with at least one disabled
person, which received housing
units with disability features
Total HUD-assisted, public
housing units (thousands)
Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large
Region
Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs
449
496
459
436
482
455
417
407
385
422
458
41.2
44.1
43.4
40.7
44.3
41.6
39.2
38.4
36.4
39.8
41.8
43.6
61.0
48.3
37.8
71.8
45.5
37.2
35.7
38.8
36.6
46.9
60.3
63.0
61.6
61.7
92.1
60.9
50.5
59.3
70.3
52.9
61.3
30.3
53.8
39.5
11.4
76.6
33.4
17.1
14.5
24.8
17.1
35.2
15.4
49.4
23.0
4.3
16.8
17.9
9.9
5.5
6.7
8.8
19.7
3.4
3.8
2.2
2.2
6.5
3.4
3.6
2.4
2.6
3.0
3.5
1,072
361
199
370
86
944
48
75
47
160
854
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files
Table 8 present various statistics for those participating in HUD’s multifamily programs. Since
HUD multifamily program participants were not asked whether they have requested disability
features, we do not present this information, but we do present the percent of households residing
in properties with units designated for the disabled, by multifamily program. In contrast to the
public housing program, we find greater ratios of disabled multifamily program participants per
1,000 units in Midwestern and rural counties. Ratios of disabled persons are greater in units
designated for the chronically mentally ill and less in units designated for the elderly and
disabled. Breaking multifamily programs down by various HUD program categories, we find
that the average size of the disabled population is highest among multifamily assisted programs
specifically designed to serve the needs of the disabled. The Section 811 program serves the
largest number of disabled persons per unit. Approximately 99 percent of those participating in
the Section 811 program live in households with at least one disabled person. In the Section 202
and 811 programs, the largest shares of households living in properties with units designated
exclusively for the disabled are indeed disabled, while in other multifamily assisted programs,
properties with units designated for the chronically mentally ill house the largest share of
households with at least one disabled person.
18
Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics
U.S.
Number of disabled
persons per 1000
multifamily units
Percent of multifamily
households with at least
one disabled person
Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large
Region
Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs
303
310
329
302
267
297
334
380
1000
221
316
30
30
32
30
26
29
33
37
100
22
31
Percent of households with at least one disabled person, among those residing in multifamily housing units designed for…
the elderly and disabled
36
31
41
40
32
35
41
46
the disabled exclusively
the chronically mentally
ill
the physically disabled
the developmentally
disabled
persons with HIV
87
75
85
94
90
87
91
91
53
96
98
97
94
98
96
94
98
75
70
53
72
68
93
69
90
65
75
91
82
99
90
97
92
98
83
50
86
100
98
70
94
86
1,298
324
355
404
192
1,169
Total HUD-assisted,
multifamily units
(thousands)
100
7
58
50
62
65
0
0
3
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics (continued)
Number of disabled
persons per 1000
multifamily units
Section
202
Section
811
Section
236
219
999
264
313
314
22
99
26
31
31
Percent of multifamily
households with at least
one disabled person
Percent of households with at
the elderly and disabled
the disabled exclusively
the chronically mentally
ill
the physically disabled
the developmentally
disabled
persons with HIV
Total HUD-assisted,
multifamily units
(thousands)
M ultifamily assisted programs
breaking out Section 8
Housing Choice Vouchers:
Project-Based
least one disabled person, among those residing in multifamily housing units designed for…
26
98
42
39
56
90
99
30
66
53
85
98
34
98
79
242
83
75
45
75
99
75
50
97
48
50
870
4
25
44
157
Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
19
Supply of and Demand for Accessible Assisted Units
Table 9 presents various indicators of the supply and demand for accessible HUD-assisted units.
Within the tenant-based voucher, multifamily, and public housing programs, we present the
percent of disabled HUD-assistance recipients that live in units specifically designated for the
disabled by geography to identify the extent to which the needs of the disabled population are
being met in these HUD programs.6 The bottom rows display, by income, the total and percent of
households with at least one disabled person, the total and percent of households with at least
one disabled person minus those receiving HUD assistance, and the percent of the disabled
population not receiving HUD assistance. These rows are further provided for two groups: the
first for all households, and the second for all rental households. The final row gives an estimate
of the percent of households with disabled persons who would qualify for HUD assistance based
on income alone but who do not receive any HUD assistance.
We find that in the tenant-based voucher program, less than five percent of disabled households
receive assistance from a tenant-based program specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled.
This percentage varies little by geography. This is a source of concern, because such vouchers do
not come with supportive services or other accommodations to meet the needs of the disabled
population. Furthermore, upon turnover, these vouchers may not be made available to other
disabled households. In public housing, the percentage is somewhat higher, but still quite low (8
percent). In Western counties, more than 10 percent of disabled persons live in public housing
units with accessibility features. The multifamily program has the highest percent of disabled
households living in properties with units designated for the disabled (48 percent). This
percentage is highest in the Midwest and in rural counties. Turning to the bottom rows in Table
9, we find that a substantial percentage of the disabled population does not receive HUD
assistance. Even among those with extremely low incomes (<30% of HAMFI), more than 70
percent of all households and 50 percent of all renting households in particular do not receive
HUD assistance. For both groups, this percentage is highest in outlying counties and within the
South.
6
These percentages refer to the proportion (prevalence) living in designated units for given level of geography
and not the share of such households found in each geography.
20
Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households
Total HUD assisted households with at least
one disabled person (1000s)
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
1,916
534
399
603
366
1,739
86
90
1,518
339
53
6
436
80
15
3
316
73
9
1
458
123
20
2
299
59
8
1
1,390
298
47
5
66
17
2
0
62
24
4
1
4,856
6,197
10,841
5,666
22,851
1,834
1,287
1,147
810
858
2,041
1,108
997
1,207
2,887
1,874
1,761
2,024
5,182
996
855
1,042
2,774
4,318
3,596
4,191
10,746
306
297
354
878
217
231
260
579
24.1
23.2
23.9
25.7
22.5
23.2
26.4
33.6
35.8
33.2
27.3
19.0
38.4
32.7
26.6
16.7
36.4
33.9
27.2
18.6
36.5
35.6
29.4
20.6
31.5
28.9
24.6
18.7
34.6
31.7
26.1
18.3
40.2
37.7
30.5
20.7
47.4
45.9
37.8
26.5
Total households with at least one disabled
person (minus disabled households receiving
HUD assistance) (1000s)
25,644
4,322
5,798
10,238
5,299
21,112
1,748
1,197
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
3,605
4,084
5,077
12,877
710
730
843
2,039
792
923
1,197
2,886
1,415
1,639
2,004
5,180
696
796
1,034
2,773
2,928
3,299
4,144
10,741
240
280
351
877
155
208
255
579
22.4
20.7
22.3
24.3
21.0
21.4
25.1
31.2
25.2
30.7
27.0
19.0
23.8
29.5
26.2
16.7
26.0
31.4
27.0
18.6
27.6
33.2
29.1
20.6
22.1
26.9
24.4
18.7
23.5
29.0
25.8
18.3
31.5
35.5
30.3
20.6
33.9
41.2
37.2
26.5
93.0
89.0
93.6
94.4
93.5
92.4
95.3
93.0
70.4
92.3
99.0
100.0
62.0
90.1
98.3
99.9
71.5
92.6
99.2
100.0
75.5
93.0
99.0
100.0
69.9
93.1
99.3
100.0
67.8
91.7
98.9
100.0
78.4
94.2
99.3
100.0
71.6
89.8
98.3
99.9
Tenure: All owner- and renter-occupied households
Total households with at least one disabled
27,560
person (1000s)
≤ 30% HAM FI
5,123
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
4,423
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
5,131
income
> 80% HAM FI
12,883
Percent of total households with at least one
disabled person
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
By
relative
income
Percent of total households with at least one
disabled person (minus disabled households
receiving HUD assistance)
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Percent of disabled households not receiving
HUD assistance
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
21
Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households (continued)
U.S.
Tenure: Renter-occupied households only
Total renting households with at least one
disabled person (1000s)
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Northeast M idwest South
Region
Region Region
West Central Outlying Rural
Region counties counties counties
8,717
1,827
1,891
3,067
1,932
7,536
467
318
3,233
1,937
1,592
1,955
816
388
290
332
715
442
354
380
1,046
694
582
745
655
413
366
497
2,824
1,646
1,366
1,701
163
109
90
105
108
81
61
67
22.9
24.2
24.9
22.9
20.1
22.0
27.0
34.4
34.0
28.1
20.3
14.1
38.3
29.2
20.7
12.4
35.3
30.4
21.5
15.5
33.1
28.8
20.9
14.7
30.0
24.2
18.2
13.5
33.1
26.9
19.4
13.5
38.4
32.9
24.2
17.4
46.2
42.5
31.2
22.3
Total renting households with at least one
disabled person (minus disabled households
receiving HUD assistance) (1000s)
6,801
1,293
1,492
2,464
1,566
5,797
381
228
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
1,715
1,599
1,539
1,949
380
308
275
330
399
369
345
380
588
571
562
743
356
354
359
497
1,434
1,349
1,319
1,695
97
92
87
104
47
58
57
67
Percent of total renting households with at
least one disabled person (minus disabled
households receiving HUD assistance)
17.8
17.1
19.7
18.4
16.3
16.9
22.0
24.7
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
18.1
23.2
19.6
14.0
17.9
23.2
19.6
12.3
19.7
25.4
20.9
15.4
18.6
23.7
20.2
14.7
16.3
20.8
17.8
13.4
16.8
22.0
18.7
13.5
22.9
27.7
23.5
17.4
19.9
30.2
29.0
22.1
78.0
70.8
78.9
80.3
81.0
76.9
81.6
71.7
53.1
82.5
96.6
99.7
46.6
79.3
94.8
99.2
55.8
83.4
97.4
99.8
56.2
82.3
96.5
99.7
54.3
85.8
97.9
99.9
50.8
81.9
96.6
99.7
59.5
84.3
97.3
99.7
43.1
71.1
93.0
99.1
Percent of total renting households with at
least one disabled person
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
By
relative
income
By
relative
income
Percent of disabled, renting households not
receiving HUD assistance
≤ 30% HAM FI
By
> 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI
income
> 80% HAM FI
Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample,
2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
22
Table 10 presents the same information, broken down by quartiles of poverty rate, median rent,
and median household income of the counties in which HUD-assisted disabled persons reside.
Generally, the percent of disabled voucher recipients receiving vouchers designated for the
disabled is higher in counties with lower poverty rates and higher median rents. The same is true
for the multifamily assisted program, although counties with moderate median rents house the
highest percent of disabled persons living in facilities designed for the disabled. The relationship
is strongest for the public housing program. For these residents, counties with high poverty rates,
low median rents, and low median incomes house the highest percent of those living in units
designated for the disabled. Turning to the section of Table 10 inventorying the unassisted
population among all households, we find that, among those with the lowest income, counties
with lower median rents and income tend to house a larger population of potentially eligible
disabled persons that do not receive HUD assistance.
Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile
using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance)
1
County level statistic
average
Average percent of
mainstream/designated
voucher households among
disabled voucher households
Average percent of disabled,
multifamily households in
properties with disability
accommodations
Poverty Rate Quartile
2
3
4
M edian Gross Rent Quartile
1
2
3
4
M edian Household Income Quartile
1
2
3
4
9.4
14.1
17.8
24.3
20.1
17.1
15.9
12.5
23.4
17.5
14.5
10.2
5.3
5.5
4.5
4.7
4.4
4.3
5.7
5.6
4.5
5.0
4.3
6.2
53.0
55.7
51.6
46.7
54.1
57.0
51.9
43.6
49.3
53.3
55.8
48.3
Average percent of disabled,
public housing households
with an accessibility feature
in their unit
6.0
7.3
6.9
9.4
8.1
8.0
6.4
7.5
9.8
6.1
7.0
6.8
Average number of HUD
assisted households with at
least one disabled person
780
934
1,389
911
256
399
972
2,392
471
753
1,156
1,635
≤ 30% HAM FI
643
734
1,103
716
177
289
758
1,977
352
567
916
1,362
> 30%, ≤ 50%
120
173
244
161
66
95
187
350
98
159
207
234
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
15
25
38
30
12
14
24
58
19
24
31
34
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
2
2
4
4
2
1
2
7
3
2
3
5
Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD
longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
23
Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile
using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) (continued)
Poverty Rate Quartile
1
2
3
Tenure: All owner- and renter-occupied households
Average number of
households with at least one 13,394
disabled person
≤ 30% HAM FI
2,241
> 30%, ≤ 50%
1,939
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
2,297
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
6,918
Average percent of total
households with at least one
disabled person
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
22.3
Average percent of total
households with at least one
disabled person (minus
disabled households
receiving HUD assistance)
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
Average percent of disabled
households not receiving
HUD assistance
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
M edian Gross Rent Quartile
1
2
3
4
M edian Household Income Quartile
1
2
3
4
14,553
18,137
10,305
5,099
7,045
14,155
30,169
6,664
11,915
15,537
22,301
2,492
2,299
3,477
2,929
2,299
1,789
913
949
1,188
1,224
2,579
2,295
5,844
4,498
1,388
1,204
2,076
2,000
2,842
2,453
4,208
3,302
2,778
3,418
1,937
1,044
1,428
2,729
5,241
1,307
2,318
2,940
3,869
6,984
8,313
4,279
2,192
3,205
6,551
14,586
2,765
5,520
7,301
10,922
27.0
30.0
33.5
34.2
29.4
26.7
22.4
35.5
29.9
25.8
21.6
37.6
33.0
40.1
37.7
42.4
41.2
42.6
44.1
47.6
46.7
42.0
41.0
38.9
37.1
34.1
31.1
46.6
46.8
41.3
41.2
39.0
36.6
35.9
31.3
26.0
30.5
34.0
38.1
39.2
33.6
30.2
25.6
40.4
33.8
29.2
25.2
17.4
21.3
23.8
26.9
26.5
23.3
21.4
18.2
28.2
23.9
20.3
17.0
13,620
16,748
9,394
4,842
6,646
13,183
27,776
6,193
11,162
14,380
20,665
1,597
1,819
1,758
2,126
2,375
2,685
1,584
1,628
737
883
898
1,129
1,821
2,108
3,867
4,147
1,036
1,106
1,509
1,841
1,926
2,246
2,846
3,068
2,282
2,754
3,379
1,908
1,032
1,415
2,705
5,183
1,289
2,294
2,909
3,835
6,916
6,982
8,309
4,275
2,190
3,203
6,549
14,579
2,762
5,518
7,298
10,918
21.3
25.6
28.5
31.7
32.6
28.0
25.3
21.1
33.7
28.4
24.5
20.4
29.5
31.2
30.9
35.1
33.1
38.3
34.2
40.8
38.8
43.5
33.4
38.1
29.9
34.5
25.4
29.1
38.2
43.5
32.2
38.3
29.8
34.1
27.3
29.5
25.8
30.3
33.7
37.6
38.8
33.3
29.9
25.4
39.9
33.4
28.9
25.1
17.4
21.3
23.8
26.9
26.5
23.3
21.4
18.2
28.2
23.9
20.3
17.0
95.4
94.7
94.4
94.2
95.1
95.0
94.5
94.1
94.8
94.8
94.4
94.8
78.5
94.0
76.0
92.9
76.4
92.3
79.5
91.7
80.2
92.8
79.7
92.3
75.5
92.7
74.9
93.1
80.5
92.0
78.2
92.5
75.2
92.7
76.4
93.8
99.5
99.2
99.0
98.6
98.9
99.1
99.2
99.2
98.7
99.0
99.2
99.4
100.0
100.0
99.9
99.9
99.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
99.9
100.0
100.0
100.0
Average number of
households with at least one
disabled person (minus
12,614
disabled households
receiving HUD assistance)
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
4
Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD
longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
24
Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile
using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) (continued)
Poverty Rate Quartile
1
2
3
4
Tenure: Renter-occupied households only
Average number of renting
households with at least one
3,702 4,462 6,236 3,667
disabled person
By
relative
income
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
HAM FI
> 50%, ≤ 80%
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
Average percent of total renting
households with at least one
disabled person
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
Average number of renting
households with at least one
disabled person (minus disabled
households receiving HUD
assistance)
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
Average percent of total renting
households with at least one
disabled person (minus disabled
households receiving HUD
assistance)
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
By
HAM FI
relative
> 50%, ≤ 80%
income
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
Average percent of disabled,
renting households not receiving
HUD assistance
By
relative
income
≤ 30% HAM FI
> 30%, ≤ 50%
HAM FI
> 50%, ≤ 80%
HAM FI
> 80% HAM FI
M edian Gross Rent Quartile
1
2
3
4
M edian Household Income
1
2
3
4
1,398
2,042
4,532
10,121
2,080
3,675
5,100
7,220
1,371
1,555
2,304
1,492
496
701
1,644
3,890
814
1,274
1,841
2,795
798
1,007
1,376
808
362
515
1,031
2,086
483
869
1,124
1,516
653
858
1,135
647
269
396
859
1,773
372
695
970
1,256
881
1,042
1,421
720
271
430
998
2,372
411
837
1,166
1,653
24.4
28.3
30.4
31.5
35.3
30.1
27.1
21.9
34.4
29.9
27.4
22.7
37.5
39.9
41.3
39.3
46.3
40.7
37.9
33.0
43.9
40.1
38.4
35.5
30.9
34.7
37.4
38.2
43.0
37.7
32.9
27.5
41.7
37.2
33.8
28.4
21.2
24.8
26.8
30.5
33.0
27.0
23.6
19.6
32.6
26.9
24.2
19.6
15.2
18.5
20.0
21.1
22.0
19.8
18.7
14.2
22.8
19.5
18.2
14.2
2,922
3,528
4,847
2,756
1,141
1,643
3,561
7,728
1,609
2,923
3,944
5,585
727
821
1,201
776
319
412
886
1,913
462
707
925
1,433
678
834
1,133
647
296
421
844
1,736
385
710
917
1,282
638
833
1,096
617
257
382
834
1,715
354
671
939
1,222
879
1,040
1,417
716
269
429
996
2,364
408
835
1,163
1,648
20.3
23.2
25.1
25.8
29.1
25.0
22.4
17.9
28.6
24.6
22.6
18.6
23.1
24.5
26.0
25.3
30.7
25.9
23.2
19.0
29.4
25.0
23.4
21.0
26.7
28.9
30.9
30.8
35.1
31.2
27.5
23.5
33.9
30.6
28.4
24.4
20.8
24.0
25.9
29.1
31.5
26.1
23.0
19.1
31.1
25.9
23.6
19.2
15.1
18.5
19.9
20.9
21.9
19.7
18.6
14.2
22.7
19.5
18.1
14.2
82.8
81.6
81.3
80.3
81.6
81.8
81.6
81.0
81.2
81.5
81.6
81.7
60.0
57.6
58.9
60.4
61.9
58.8
59.9
56.2
60.3
62.0
56.6
57.9
84.1
82.5
81.6
80.1
81.5
81.5
83.2
82.0
80.1
82.1
82.4
83.7
98.1
95.7
95.9
95.6
94.4
95.4
97.7
97.8
95.2
95.6
96.8
97.8
99.8
99.5
99.6
99.8
99.7
99.6
99.8
99.7
99.6
99.8
99.5
99.8
Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD
longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database
25
Conclusions and Policy Implications
This report presents the first comprehensive nationwide analysis of the relationship between
disabled households, disabled HUD-assisted households, and the HUD-assisted units in which
households reside. We conclude with a discussion of several policy implications of these
findings, focusing on specific policy questions addressed by our analyses.
Which HUD programs serve the largest number of disabled households by the age and sex of
disabled household members?
The number of disabled persons per HUD-assisted housing unit is largest among the workingage population (age 18-64), regardless of the sex of disabled persons. We find that HUD
programs serve a larger number of female disabled adults than males, likely due in part to the
prevalence of female-headed households in the population of HUD-assisted households. Below
age 18, however, greater numbers of disabled males than disabled females are found per unit.
Comparing these outcomes across program types, we find that the number of disabled persons
per HUD-assisted housing unit is greatest in the mainstream voucher program, which is
somewhat expected given that this program is specifically targeted to households with disabled
persons. With the exception of the Section 811 program, most HUD programs serve a lower
income population.
Considering programs not specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled, the prevalence of
disabled persons is highest in the tenant-based voucher program. Among disabled persons
receiving tenant-based voucher assistance, less than five percent of disabled households receive
assistance from a tenant-based program specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled. By
comparison, 48 percent of disabled persons participating in the multifamily program live in
properties with units designated for the disabled. This is a source of policy concern, because such
non-designated vouchers do not come with supportive services or other accommodations to meet
the needs of the disabled population. Furthermore, upon turnover, these vouchers may not be
made available for other disabled households.
Which types of geographic areas are most successful in serving the needs of disabled HUDassisted households?
HUD-assisted disabled households are more prevalent in the West and in central counties, but
these results vary with the age of disabled persons. Greater numbers of disabled individuals of all
age groups are found per 1,000 assisted units in the South. We also find that these ratios are
greater for working-aged female disabled persons in outlying suburban counties, for disabled
children and elderly persons in the South, and for working-aged disabled persons in the West.
We find that the percent of disabled HUD-assisted households living in units designated for the
disabled varies little by geography with a few exceptions. In the public housing program,
Western counties accommodate the highest share of disabled households in designated units, and
in the multifamily program, rural Midwestern counties accommodate the highest percentage. If
we consider those in the public housing program that have requested disability amenities, only
30 percent of those requesting such amenities actually received them. This percentage is highest
in the West, where 77 percent of those requesting disability features received them, and lowest in
26
the South, where only 11 percent of those requesting disability features received them. Central
counties are also more successful in matching disabled households with their requested
accommodations. We also find that in the public housing program particularly, counties with
high poverty rates, low median rents, and low median incomes house the highest percent of
disabled households living in units designated for the disabled.
We find that a substantial percentage of potentially-eligible disabled U.S. households do not
receive HUD assistance. Even among those with extremely low incomes (<30% of AMI), more
than 70 percent of total households and more than 50 percent of renting households do not
receive HUD assistance. This percentage is highest in outlying counties within the South and in
counties with lower rents and, for total households, median incomes. These findings point to a
need for more community outreach to identify potentially-eligible and interested disabled
households for HUD’s disability assistance programs. Devine (2000) conducted an informal
survey of 25 PHAs to identify how disabled households were recruited for participation in
HUD’s mainstream voucher program and found that more than half added disabled persons to
waiting lists following community outreach to local advocacy groups and other public and
private agencies. Our results point to the need for more targeting of such efforts, particularly
within suburban counties in the South.
Which types of PHAs are most successful in serving the needs of disabled HUD-assisted
households?
We find that larger PHAs generally serve a larger number of disabled persons. Large PHAs are
also generally more successful in accommodating disabled households within accessible units
than smaller PHAs. There is one exception to these overall trends: medium-sized PHAs serve a
larger population of working-aged disabled males.
Future research should determine why large PHAs are more successful in accommodating
disabled households within accessible units, particularly disabled households earning lower
incomes. Larger PHAs may operate more efficiently due to economies of scale, may be better
staffed, and may have more resources to address the needs of special needs populations.
Alternatively, other confounding factors may be driving the results for large PHAs, such as
disabled people being more predominantly located in areas with larger PHAs. PHAs in larger
cities may also have admissions preferences that favor disabled persons of a particular sex or age
group. Finally, as suggested by Devine’s (2000) analysis of a sample of PHAs administering the
mainstream voucher program, larger PHAs may be more capable of actively seeking out special
needs households through various community outreach efforts.
How should HUD data resources be revised to address future questions pertaining to disability?
We conclude with a discussion of proposed changes to HUD’s administrative datasets that would
facilitate future analyses of HUD-assisted disabled households. First, information on disabled
households is often provided in more than one database, raising the potential for conflicting
information about the program or location where the household resides, even after controlling for
the “effective date” of a household action. Future assessments, using pooled datasets scanned for
consistency, would better allow researchers to unambiguously identify a household’s program
and geography at a given point in time.
27
Second, the definition of disability and disability program status are not clearly and consistently
identified in HUD’s data resources. Both PIC and TRACS include a single variable identifying
disability for HUD program participants, but the information does not contain type of disability,
making it impossible to determine if HUD households are living in units appropriate for their
disability. Only public housing residents are asked to identify whether an accessible unit was
requested and received. This information should be provided for all HUD program participants,
and an additional question should be added such as, “Does the requested accessible unit provide
all necessary accommodations appropriate to the disabled household member(s) needs?”
Furthermore, the information for disability program status was made available in several separate
variables (see Appendix A). We recommend that a single variable be created to make it easier to
identify any and all disability programs for which HUD-assisted households qualify. If additional
supportive services are provided, these should be identified as well.
Third, we note several instances of missing data and potential measurement error in key
variables used to analyze disability. For example, roughly 15 percent of public housing
observations did not have information on whether accessibility features were provided. In some
instances, high values for age were observed (with more than 1,700 observations being over 100,
and more than 2 dozen over 120), several of which were seemingly unrealistic. This generally
coincided with erroneous information on birth dates.
Finally, in this analysis we had to combine both the 5-year (2006-2010) and 3-year (2008-2010)
CHAS files to determine the total number of disabled households within each income group,
because both the total number of households and total number of disabled households within
each income group was not available in each sample. Future CHAS products should make such
comparisons feasible for each CHAS sample provided.
28
References
Devine, Deborah. 2000. Persons with Disabilities Assisted under the Section 8 Mainstream SetAside Program. Cityscape 5, 1: 231-235.
Hoffman, Denise W. and Gina A. Livermore. 2012. The house next door: A comparison of
residences by disability status using new measures in the American Housing Survey. Cityscape
14, 1: 5-34.
Perl, Libby. 2013. Section 811 and Other HUD Housing Programs for Persons with Disabilities.
Congressional Research Service report 7-5700. Washington, D.C.
Schwartz, Alex F. 2015. Housing Policy in the United States, 3rd Ed. Routledge: London.
She, Peiyun, and Gina A. Livermore. 2009. Long-Term Poverty and Disability among WorkingAge Adults. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 19, 4: 244–256.
Souza, Maria Teresa, Robert A. Collinson, Marge Martin, Barry L. Steffen, David A.
Vandenbroucke, and Yung-Gann David Yao. 2011. 2009 Worst Case Housing Needs of People
with Disabilities. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy
Development and Research: Washington, D.C.
29
Appendices. Explanation of data products and variable
codebook
The first part of this document, Appendix A, provides a detailed explanation of the process
associated with generating the data products and the variables contained therein. A codebook
listing the variable and their definitions for each file can be found in the second part of this
document in Appendix B. While the information in these two sections overlap to a large extent,
the first section offers additional details beyond particular calculations, and more specifically
outlines the assumptions made by the researchers, as well as any additional comments and
caveats.
Appendix A. Explanation of data products
Data products derived from public summary files
The following data products, A)-D), were calculated at the national, state, county, and place level
(using FIPS codes for the latter three),7 using publicly available data from the Census Bureau and
the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Note that all output covers only the 50
states and the District of Columbia (thereby ignoring other regions with FIPS codes, such as
Puerto Rico). Product D) additionally reports variables at the level of PHA and multifamily
Project.
A) Number of disabled persons by sex and age (< 5, 5-17, 18-34, 35-64, 65-74, 75+), and
ratio of number of disabled persons by sex and age to the number of occupied housing
units.
Source: 2009-2013 5-year ACS estimates (Tables B18101 for disability status and
B25002 for occupied housing units)
Files: “sex by age by disability, ACS 2009-2013 (total count).xlsx” and
“sex by age by disability, ACS 2009-2013 (per occupied housing unit).xlsx”
Geographies are distinguished by worksheet, within each file. Variable names are
primarily self-explanatory, and make use of the following acronyms:
o Dis: disabled
o POHU: per occupied housing unit
B) Ratio of number of disabled persons by age (<18, 18-64, and 65+) and poverty status to
number of occupied housing units.
Source: 2009-2013 5-year ACS estimates (Table C18130 for disability / poverty status
and B25002 for occupied housing units).
A “Census designated place” (CDP), or “place” for short, is defined by the Census as a concentration of
population identified for statistical classifications purposes. They are delineated for each decennial census as the
statistical counterparts of incorporated places, such as counties, towns, and villages. CDPs are not jurisdictions per
se; however, their geography tends to be similar to the places incorporated within.
7
30
File: “age by disability by poverty, ACS 2009-2013 (per occupied housing unit).xls”
Geographies are distinguished by worksheet. Variable names are primarily selfexplanatory, and make use of the following acronyms:
o Dis: disabled
o Pov/NoPov: count for households that are in poverty/not in poverty
o POHU: per occupied housing unit
Products A) and B) were obtained directly from queries made on Dataferret.
Unfortunately, the age category breakdowns available for B) are less detailed in the 5year estimates for ACS (in the case of disability/poverty status, only the “C” Table is
available for download, rather than the alternative, more detailed “B” Table).
C) Number of households containing at least one disabled person by type of disability,
tenure status, and household income (as a percent of HAMFI).
Source: 2008-2010 CHAS (obtained using the CHAS Data Query tool on huduser.org).
File: “CHAS data, 2008-2010.xls”
For this data product, the variable names already provided by CHAS were used. They are
identified in the subsequent worksheet, labeled “variable key.”
D) Total unit count, total occupied, percent occupied, number reported, and percent (among
those occupied) reported.
Source: A Picture of Subsidized Housing (POSH), 2013
File: “POSH unit totals by program.xlsx”
Nine program categories are used in this file, and are determined using the “program”
and “sub-program” variables from POSH (which is available only in the Project level file,
which is then aggregated for other levels of geography), as follows:
1) Public housing: program equals 2
2) Section 8 certificates and vouchers: program equals 3
3) Section 8 mod rehab: program equals 4
4) Multifamily, Section 202: sub-program equals 2 or 3
5) Multifamily, Section 236: sub-program equals 4
6) Multifamily, Section 811: program equals 4, (i.e., sub-program equals 5 or 6)
7) Multifamily, programs breaking out Section 8: sub-program equals 1
8) Multifamily, all other: sub-program equals 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11
9) All programs combined: no qualifiers
Note that POSH provides information on the number of total units and the percent
reported, from which it is possible to estimate, as done here, the number of occupied
units. However, in the event of a low occupied unit count, the percent occupied is not
31
reported. By extension, this inhibits the percent reported, among those occupied, from
also being reported (since the denominator is missing, in such cases). For this reason, in
addition to the four variables, two flag variables, Flag_OccupiedMissingObs and
Flag_NumReportedMissingObs, are reported. The former indicates whether the project
level observation – for the Project level sheet – or at least one project level observation
used to aggregate the value listed in the row for higher levels of aggregation was missing
information on the percent of occupied units; the latter reports this for in a similar manner
for the number reported variable, when information for it was missing for either a row
directly in the Project worksheet or at least one of the projects used to calculate estimates
for higher levels of aggregation. Thus, when a flag for either is reported, it is important
that the estimate of total occupied and percent occupied (for the former flag), and number
reported (for the second flag) be interpreted as a lower bound. When the second flag only
is reported, the percent reported may be interpreted as an upper bound. However, when
both flags are reported for a row, it is difficult to interpret the percent reported, since both
the numerator and denominator comprising the estimate are underestimated.
Note also that, for the PHA worksheet, unit counts for the multifamily programs are not
provided. This is because PHAs do not oversee multifamily programs.
Data products derived from HUD administrative data
Before discussing the subsequent data products, the following several measures that were taken,
in preparing the data for aggregation, should be noted.
Any rows in the data indicating the households removal from a program, i.e., with an
entry for actn_type_cd of "6","MO", or "TM", was dropped from our analysis
Beginning with the longitudinal file (“index_hshld_longitudinal_2013”), it was
recognized that many observations had duplicate entries in the data. These were primarily
managed by using information about the most recent effective date (efctv_dt). In the
event of duplicates entries with identical entries for efctv_dt, however, the following
process was employed.
o Households were then compared the the date provided from the variable admsn_dt.
The entry with the more recent admission date was used, when a discrepancy existed.
o In the event of identical dates for admsn_dt as well, it was observed that virtually all
households with duplicates entries were listed in more than one system (the Public
and Indian Housing Information Center, or PIC [form 50058, and/or form 50058
MTW], or TRACS), and that one of the entries had listed as being part of a tenantbased or project-based housing choice voucher program (based on how participation
in such is defined in Table 1A of this document). These HCV entries for each
household were given priority.
o Less than a dozen households remain with duplicate entries, following this procedure.
Most of these share identical geographic and income information, and are thus of no
concern. Four households remained, which contained conflicting geographic
information. In the absence of further information, one of the two locations was
32
arbitrarily chosen, since no other information was available to indicate which should
take priority.
Households are then classified into one of eleven HUD program categories (public
housing; Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) – tenant based/all other; HCV – “designated”;
HCV – mainstream; HCV – homeownership; HCV – project-based; Section 8 Moderate
Rehabilitation; multifamily assisted programs breaking out Section 8, Section 202/811,
and Section 236). For details on this procedure, see Table 1A. In addition, they are
separately included in a category for all HUD programs combined. Programs for HCV
and multifamily are also combined together, in separate categories.
Households are furthermore classified into one of four income categories:
o Extremely low income (L30): where
total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or
ext_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y”
o Very low income (L50): where
ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ very_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or
(very_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y” and ext_low_inc_lmt_indr does not equal “Y”)
(note that this category excludes L30 households)
o Low income (L80): where
very_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ low_inc_lmt_amnt
(note that this category excludes L50 and L30 households)
o Non-low income (all other): where
total_annl_incm_amnt > low_inc_lmt_amnt
In the event that no information is provided on either income or income category
thresholds that apply to a household, they are excluded from this part of the analysis (note
that these were not a major concern, as they comprise less than one percent of the total
sample)
The following methods were used to identify particular attributes of each household:
o Whether disability features were requested: acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or
acsblty_rcvd_indr equaled “1” through “6” (i.e., neither contains an empty value, nor
equals “0”)
o Whether disability features were obtained: acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2”
o Whether a household’s unit was designated as accessible: acsbl_unit_indr equals
“Y”
o Whether the accessibility designation is known: acsbl_unit_indr equals “Y” or “N”
(i.e., not empty)
33
Disability status: households were identified as disabled by one of the following three
methods:
o Using the member file (index_member_longitudinal_2013), if a member of the
household had a disability indicator (mbr_dsblty_indr) of “Y” or “y”
o In the event no disabled were reported in the aforementioned file, households were
alternatively labeled as disabled* by one of the following methods:
Using the disabled indicator from the “mf_member_special_status_code” file,
households were denoted as disabled if “H” was reported under
SPECIAL_STATUS_CD
Matching households to the file “mf_property_id_imparement”, a household was
labeled as disabled if they had an indicator of “Y” for any of the following three
variables: MOBILITY_IMPARED_IND, HEARING_IMPRD_IND,
VISUALLY_IMPRD_IND
o Lastly, when merged with the “ssi_households” file, if the family is recorded as 1)
receiving a nonzero amount of SSI, and 2) not having anyone in the household age
65+ (since disability is not a prerequisite for members of this group to receive SSI)
*For these households, we cannot calculate just how many members within a household are
disabled, let alone their age and gender. As a conservative measure, we assume that only one
disabled member resides in each of these households. Any aggregated tabulations, therefore,
concerned with the total disabled count per region ought to be regarded as a lower bound
estimate. Tabulations concerning the sex and age of disabled household members will not
include these households, since there is no information to identify the age and sex of the disabled
household member(s).
When collapsing the data to various geographic levels, the following information from
the longitudinal file (i.e., index_hshld_longitudinal_2013) is used to classify a
household’s geography:
o State: unit_fips_state_cd
o County: unit_fips_state_cd and unit_fips_cnty_cd
o Place: unit_fips_state_cd and unit_place_cd
o PHA: pha_cd
o Project: for observations from TRACS, proj_num; for observations from PIC,
dvlpt_num
The variables used to identify geography in the data products are hhNation, hhState, hhCounty,
hhPlace, hhPHA, hhProj.
It should also be noted that many variables generated using the HUD longitudinal data are
bottom-coded, in the event that few households are counted for a particular statistic within a
specified geography and program. In general, entries are bottom-coded with a value of -1 in the
34
event that the number (or, in the event of it being a fraction or percent, the value of either the
numerator or denominator) is less than 10. Details concerning which variables are subject to
bottom-coding, and how bottom-coding was determined in such cases, are provided in the
codebook (Appendix B).
The following products were calculated at the following levels, using HUD administrative data:
national, state, county, place, PHA, and housing project:
E) Number of disabled household members per HUD-assisted unit by sex and age (< 5, 517, 18-34, 35-64, 65-74, 75+, and all age categories).
Files: “disabled household count by sex by age.xlsx”
The age categories are constructed so as to be consistent with those reported in the ACS.
The age and gender of each household member is determined directly from the
“index_member_longitudinal” file (which is merged with the previously discussed
household data), using the “mbr_age_yr_cnt” and “male” variables. Note that some
observations were reported with erroneous, or seemingly erroneous, information; over
1700 observations have a reported age of 100+, and 26 observations of 120+. Albeit an
arbitrary threshold, for the sake of establishing a boundary, we cap the age 75+ category
at the age of 110.
o First, binary variables are created which classify whether a household member falls
into a particular sex-age-disabled category (e.g., male, age 18-34, disabled).
o Second, this information is aggregated to the household level, by taking the
summation for each indicator by household id, giving us a household level total of
disabled persons for each sex-age-disability cohort.
o The dataset is then collapsed to the household level.
o For each geographic level, households are then aggregated by taking the summation
of household totals for each group. This value, for each cohort, is then divided by the
summation of total HUD-assisted units, which is calculated as the summation of all
households within our longitudinal file that are identified with that particular level of
geography. The acronym PAU for each variable is used to refer to “per assisted unit”.
F) Number of households containing at least one disabled person by household income (as a
percent of HAMFI).
Files: “disabled household count by household income.xlsx”
The aggregation process is conducted in a manner very analogous to E), with a few
notable exceptions. First the number of disabled persons was not counted; instead, a
binary indicator was simply used to denote if a household had at least one disabled
member. These binary values were then aggregated to produce a total household count
for each geographic level. Second, instead of calculating the summations for each
geographic level by sex-age-disabled cohort, the disabled households are each separated
into four income categories (L30, L50, L80, and non-low income). The values in this file
are reported in terms of both total count and, as with E), per-assisted unit.
35
Note: All statistics to be henceforth discussed have their variable names noted in parentheses at
the end of each heading.
Public Housing Statistics
File: “disability characteristics of public housing residents.xlsx”
For public housing statistics, G)-K), the sample is filtered to include only households for which
the variable “pgm_type_cd” equals “P”.
G) Number of disabled persons per public housing household (totDisabledPerPHHH)
The summation of disabled individuals contained in all public housing households,
divided by the total number of public housing households counted for that particular
geography.
H) Number of public housing households with at least one disabled person
(totalDisabledHHs)
The sum of public housing households with at least one disabled person.
I) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person
(pctTotalDisabledHHs)
The value from H), times 100, divided by the total number of HUD-assisted units counted
at each level of geography.
J) Number of public housing households requesting disability features by disability status
(reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis)
Calculated by tallying the total number of households for which either 1)
acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or 2) acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” through “6” (i.e., does
not equal 0, nor is blank). This is calculated separately for households with and without 1
or more disabled persons in the household.
K) Percent of public housing households requesting disability features which have at least
one disabled person (pctReqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis)
The value from J) for reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the sum of
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis and reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis.
L) Number of public housing households receiving disability features by disability status
(recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis)
Similar procedure to J): this time, tallying only disabled and nondisabled households for
which acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2” (i.e., the household fully [“1”] or partially
[“2”] received accessibility features that were requested)
M) Percent of public housing households receiving disability features which have at least one
disabled person (pctRecvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis)
The value from L) for recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the sum of
recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis and recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis.
36
N) Number of public housing households requesting accessibility features, which ultimately
received them, by disability status (reqstdAndRecvd_Dis, reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis)
For disabled and non-disabled groups separately, the number of households which both
requested and received accessibility features.
O) Percent of public housing households requesting accessibility features, which ultimately
received them, by disability status (pctReqstdAndRecvd_Dis,
pctRreqstdAndRecvd_NoDis)
The first is equal to reqstdAndRecvd_Dis, times 100, divided by reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis.
The second is equal to reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis, times 100, divided by
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis.
P) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person receiving housing
units with disability features (pctDisHHsWithAccssbltyFtrs)
The value from recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the total number of
disabled public housing households (totalDisabledHHs) counted for that geography.
Multifamily Assisted Program Statistics
File: “disability characteristics of multifamily residents.xlsx”
As the next calculations, L)-O), all pertain to multifamily assisted tenants, the sample is filtered
to households designated, following the procedure outlined in Table 1A, for the following
categories: Section 202, Section 811, Section 236, multifamily programs breaking out Section 8,
and “all other”.
Q) Number of disabled persons per multifamily unit (totDisabledPerUnit)
Similar procedure to that of G), this time using the universe of multifamily – rather than
public housing - households.
The unit count is determined directly for all geographic levels except for the PHA and
Project level using Data directly from the POSH database. The total unit count is
aggregated for each geography for program categories “Section 8 New Construction or
Substantial Rehabilitation (including 202/8 projects)”, “Section 236 Projects (FHAFederal Housing Administration)”, and “All other multifamily assisted projects with
FHA insurance or HUD subsidy (including Section 8 Loan Management, Rental
Assistance Program (RAP), Rent Supplement (SUP), Property Disposition, Section
202/811 capital advance, and Preservation”. The total unit counts for PHA and project
level results are alternatively calculated using the information within the longitudinal
data, using a method similar to that outlined for counting the number of project level
public housing units. Instead of using dvlpt_num and dvlpmnt_acc_unit_cnt. However,
the variables cntrt_num and cntrt_asstd_unit_cnt are used, which are specific to each
multifamily contract. In the case of PHA level estimates, however, not every household
within a particular multifamily unit always belonged to the same PHA. A threshold was
employed, therefore, whereby a PHA’s unit count only included a multifamily unit if more
37
than 10 percent of the households listed under for a given entry for cntrt_num were listed
with the PHA.
R) Number of households living in multifamily properties with at least one disabled person
(totalDisabledHHs)
The sum of multifamily households with at least one disabled person.
S) Percent of households living in multifamily properties with at least one disabled person
(pctTotalDisabledHHs)
The value from totalDisabledHHs, times 100, divided by the total number of multifamily
households counted for the geography.
T) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties
designed for the disabled disaggregated by type of disability feature (facility for
elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically
disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV) (totalDisHHs_<condition>,
where <condition> refers to EldrlyDisbld, DisbldExclsv, ChrncMentlIll, PhysDisbld,
DvlpmtDisbld, HIV)
Similar procedure to that of R), with calculations further disaggregated by the type of
disability feature. Such disaggregation is made possible from merging the household data
with the iREMS files - “iREMS 20141016 dbo_owner_survey” (1) and “iREMS
20141016 dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail” (2) – containing the following indicators:
o eldrly_disabled_indicator (1)
o exclusive_disabled_indicator (1)
o chronically_mentally_ill_ind (2)
o mobility_impairment_ind / other_impairment_ind (2) (facilities are identified as
being for physically disabled if either one of these indicators equals “Y”)
o developmentally_disabled_ind (2)
o hiv_ind (2)
U) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily housing
units with disability features by type of disability feature (pctDisHHs_<condition>,
where <condition> refers to those listed in T))
The value from T) is multiplied by 100, then divided by the total number of households
residing in units containing each type of disability feature. (For example, if in a locality
there are 100 households with at least one disabled person living in a unit of a facility
identified as being for the physically disabled, and there are 200 total households
identified within that locality as residing within a unit of a facility for the physically
disabled, the value reported here would be 50 percent.) Note that in some geographies,
there are zero units with a particular disability feature, in which case this procedure
produces an empty value, since zero cannot be a denominator value.
38
Assisted Unit Count
File: “accessible unit count by number of bedrooms.xlsx”
V) The number of accessible public housing and multifamily units by bedroom count
(accessibleUnits_<bedroom group>, where <bedroom group> is categorized into 0 to 1
bedrooms (0to1Br), 2 bedrooms (2Br), 3 bedrooms (3Br), and 4 or more bedrooms
(4plusBr))
These estimates are obtained by counting the number of households inhabiting 1) a public
housing unit which, by our previously noted criteria, is denoted as accessible, or 2) a
multifamily property with disability features previously listed under T). Note that,
because no information was available to the researchers for counting the number of units
within each multifamily property specifically (i.e., the iREMs categorizes, for
multifamily properties as a whole, whether disability features are available), these counts
are to be interpreted as upper bound estimates. The bedroom count for each unit is
determined from the variable num_bedrm_cnt, listed for each observation in the HUD
longitudinal data.
Supply and Demand Statistics
File: “unaided inventory.xlsx”
This file, provided for four geographic levels (U.S., state, county, and place) is discussed in two
parts. The first, with products W) through Y), concerns statistics compiled with the combined
use of HUD longitudinal data and CHAS data. The second, with Z) though BB), covers the final
three summary statistics derived directly from the HUD longitudinal data.
The CHAS data provided by HUD for 2008-2010 (Table 6), when disaggregated by income
group, provides only calculations that are disaggregated by disability group, including a group
for nondisabled households. Because a household may be counted under more than one disabled
category, it is therefore currently not possible to directly calculate the total number of disabled
households by adding together the totals from each group. For this reason, we additionally
employ the CHAS dataset for 2006-2010, where an estimate of the total households for each
income category are provided (Table 1A6). Subsequent references to the count of total disabled
households, for each low income group, are to be thus interpreted as the difference between of
total number of households according to the 2006-2010 CHAS data, and the total number of
households identified as non-disabled, according to the 2008-2010 CHAS data.
W) Total disabled households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels (disHHs
<income group>, where <income group> refers to households within the income groups
L30, L50, L80, over L80 [and, as noted earlier in this document, with these income
groups being mutually exclusive, such that L50, for example, does not include L30
households], and all income groups)
This is calculated directly from CHAS, by taking the estimated total number of disabled
households within each of the four income groups.
39
X) Percent of households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels which have at
least one disabled person (pctDisHHs <income group>)
For each income group, the value from W), times 100, divided by the total number of
households within that income group.
Y) Total households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels with at least one
disabled person minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance
(unaidedDisHHs<income group>)
This simply subtracts, from W), the number of HUD-assisted households with at least
one disabled person within each low income category. These were calculated directly in
the previously discussed “disabled household count by household income” file.
Z) Percent of households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels with at least one
disabled person minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance
(pctUnaidedDisHHs<income group>)
Similar procedure to X), but using Y) for the numerator instead of W).
AA) Percent of households with at least one disabled person not receiving HUD assistance
(pctUnaidedDisHHs<income group>)
The value of Y) divided by W).
The final three summary statistics are calculated directly from the HUD longitudinal database.
BB) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted household in a housing voucher program, whose
voucher is either part of the Designated or Mainstream voucher program
(pctDisVoucherHHsInDesigOrMs)
This calculates the percentage of households with one or more disabled persons listed
under one of the five voucher programs listed in Table 1A which fall into either the
designated or mainstream voucher category.
CC) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, households in a multifamily property living within a
multifamily property with designated accessible units (pctDisMFHHsInAccblUnt)
This calculates the percentage of households with one or disabled person, among those
within a multifamily program, which live within a multifamily property that is designed
for any one of the disability groups listed previously under H) and I).
DD) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, public housing households living within a designated
accessible unit (pctDisPHHHsInAccblUnt)
This calculates the percentage of public housing households with at least one disabled
person that are living in an accessible unit (indicated by having an entry of “Y” under
acsbl_unit_indr)
40
Table A1. Methodology for sorting each household into applicable HUD program
Program
Identified in household data using
public housing
pgm_type_cd equals "P"
housing choice vouchers (HCV):
tenant-based and all other
1) either A) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", or "T"; or B)
pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd either equals "TBV" or is
blank; and 2) neither ned_spcl_pgm_indr nor ms5_spcl_pgm_indr
equals 1
HCV: "designated"
1) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", "T", or "V"; or B)
pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and 2) ned_spcl_pgm_indr equals 1, and 3)
ms5_spcl_pgm_indicator does not equal 1
HCV: mainstream
1) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", "T", or "V"; or B)
pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and 2) ms5_spcl_pgm_indr equals 1
HCV: homeownership
pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd equals "HV"
HCV: project-based
pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd equals "PBV"
Section 8 moderate rehabilitation
pgm_type_cd equals "MR"
Section 202
either 1) pgm_type_cd equals "H7" or "H9"; or 2) the 4th and 5th digits
of proj_num equal "EH","HH", or "SH"
Section 811
pgm_type_cd equals "H6" or "H8"
Section 236
either 1) pgm_type_cd equals "H4" or 2) pgm_type_cd equals "H1" and
the 4th and 5th digits of proj_num equal "44" or "45"
multifamily assisted programs
breaking out Section 8
all observations with pgm_type_cd of H1,H2,H3, and H5 which are not
otherwise part of Section 202/811 or 236, above
All programs combined
no qualifiers
All HCV programs combined
All 5 HCV programs listed above
All Multifamily programs combined
All multifamily programs listed above (Section 202, 236, and 811; all
multifamily programs breaking out Section 8)
41
Appendix B. Variable Codebook
SEX BY AGE BY DISABILITY ,
ACS 2009-2013 (TOTAL COUNT).XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place)
Variable
Description
GEOID
Geography ID
SUMLEVEL
Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
ST
State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
COUNTY
County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet)
PLACE
Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet)
malesUnder5Dis
Total disabled males under the age of 5
males5to17Dis
Total disabled males age 5-17
males18to34Dis
Total disabled males age 18-34
males35to65Dis
Total disabled males age 35-65
males65to74Dis
Total disabled males age 65-74
males75PlusDis
Total disabled males age 75 or higher
femalesUnder5Dis
Total disabled females under the age of 5
females5to17Dis
Total disabled females age 5-17
females18to34Dis
Total disabled females age 18-34
females35to65Dis
Total disabled females age 35-65
females65to74Dis
Total disabled females age 65-74
females75PlusDis
Total disabled females age 75 or higher
SEX BY AGE BY DISABILITY,
ACS 2009-2013 (PER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT ).XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place)
Variable
Description
GEOID
Geography ID
SUMLEVEL
Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
ST
State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
COUNTY
County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet)
PLACE
Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet)
malesUnder5DisPOHU
Total disabled males under the age of 5, per occupied housing unit
males5to17DisPOHU
Total disabled males age 5-17, per occupied housing unit
males18to34DisPOHU
Total disabled males age 18-34, per occupied housing unit
males35to65DisPOHU
Total disabled males age 35-65, per occupied housing unit
males65to74DisPOHU
Total disabled males age 65-74, per occupied housing unit
males75PlusDisPOHU
Total disabled males age 75 or higher, per occupied housing unit
femalesUnder5DisPOHU
Total disabled females under the age of 5, per occupied housing
unit
Total disabled females age 5-17, per occupied housing unit
females5to17DisPOHU
42
females18to34DisPOHU
Total disabled females age 18-34, per occupied housing unit
females35to65DisPOHU
Total disabled females age 35-65, per occupied housing unit
females65to74DisPOHU
Total disabled females age 65-74, per occupied housing unit
females75PlusDisPOHU
Total disabled females age 75 or higher, per occupied housing unit
AGE BY DISABILITY BY POVERTY ,
ACS 2009-2013 (PER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT).XLS
NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place)
Variable
Description
GEOID
Geography ID
SUMLEVEL
Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
ST
State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
COUNTY
County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet)
PLACE
Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet)
under18DisPOHU
Total disabled population below age 18, per occupied housing unit
under18DisPovPOHU
Total disabled population below age 18 in poverty, per occupied
housing unit
Total disabled population below age 18 not in poverty, per occupied
housing unit
Total disabled population age 18-64, per occupied housing unit
under18DisNoPovPOHU
age18to64DisPOHU
age18to64DisPovPOHU
age18to64DisNoPovPOHU
age65PlusDisPOHU
age65PlusDisPovPOHU
age65PlusDisNoPovPOHU
Total disabled population age 18-64 in poverty, per occupied
housing unit
Total disabled population age 18-64 not in poverty, per occupied
housing unit
Total disabled population age 65 and above, per occupied housing
unit
Total disabled population age 65 and above in poverty, per
occupied housing unit
Total disabled population age 65 and above not in poverty, per
occupied housing unit
POSH UNIT TOTALS BY PROGRAM.XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in one sheet, combining six different levels of geographic aggregation (nation, state,
county, place, PHA, and project)
Nation
indicator for U.S.
State
State FIPS code
County
County FIPS code
Place
Place FIPS code
PHA
PHA ID
Project
Project ID
HUDProgramCategory
totalUnits
HUD Program Category (See Data Explanations Section for how
these are determined)
total number of units
totalOccupied
total number of occupied units
pctOccupied
totalOccupied divided by totalUnits
43
totalReported
pctReported
Flag_OccupiedMissingObs
Flag_NumReportedMissingObs
Number of households for which reports(Form-50058, From-50059)
were received
Percent, among those occupied, for which reports were received
Indicator either 1) for non-project level estimates, at least one
project used to calculate the aggregated estimate was missing
information for the percent (and, by extension, the number
occupied), or 2) for project level estimates, that information was
missing for the percent, and number, occupied
Indicator either 1) for non-project level estimates, at least one
project used to calculate the aggregated estimate was missing
information for the number (and thus the percent) reported, or 2)
for project level estimates, that information was missing for the
number (and percent) reported
CHAS DATA, 2008-2010.XLS
NOTE: this file is provided in one sheet, combining four different levels of geographic aggregation (nation, state,
county, and place)
Variable
Description
sumlevel
Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet)
geoid
Geography ID
name
Name
st
State FIPS code
cnty
County FIPS code
place
Place FIPS code
T6_est1
Total: Occupied housing units
T6_est87
Renter occupied
T6_est2
Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment
T6_est19
Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
T6_est36
Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation
T6_est53
Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent
living limitation
Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations
T6_est70
T6_est88
T6_est105
Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision
impairment
Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
T6_est122
Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation
T6_est139
Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or
independent living limitation
Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above
limitations
Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment
AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment
AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal
to 50% of HAMFI
T6_est156
T6_est3
T6_est7
44
T6_est11
T6_est15
T6_est20
T6_est24
T6_est28
T6_est32
T6_est37
T6_est41
T6_est45
T6_est49
T6_est54
T6_est58
T6_est62
T6_est66
T6_est71
T6_est75
T6_est79
T6_est83
T6_est89
Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment
AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal
to 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment
AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND
Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND
Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to
50% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND
Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to
80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND
Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND
Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND
Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to
50% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND
Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to
80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND
Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent
living limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30%
of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent
living limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but
less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent
living limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but
less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent
living limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of
HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations
AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations
AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal
to 50% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations
AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal
to 80% of HAMFI
Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations
AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision
impairment AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of
HAMFI
45
T6_est93
T6_est97
T6_est101
T6_est106
T6_est110
T6_est114
T6_est118
T6_est123
T6_est127
T6_est131
T6_est135
T6_est140
T6_est144
T6_est148
T6_est152
T6_est157
T6_est161
T6_est165
T6_est169
Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision
impairment AND Household income is greater than 30% but less
than or equal to 50% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision
impairment AND Household income is greater than 50% but less
than or equal to 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision
impairment AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal
to 50% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal
to 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation
AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation
AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation
AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal
to 50% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation
AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal
to 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation
AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or
independent living limitation AND Household income is less than or
equal to 30% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or
independent living limitation AND Household income is greater
than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or
independent living limitation AND Household income is greater
than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or
independent living limitation AND Household income is greater
than 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above
limitations AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of
HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above
limitations AND Household income is greater than 30% but less
than or equal to 50% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above
limitations AND Household income is greater than 50% but less
than or equal to 80% of HAMFI
Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above
limitations AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI
46
DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY SEX BY AGE (TOTAL COUNT ).XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
Variable
Description
hhNation
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported
only in "PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and
dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj"
worksheet)
HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined)
hhState
hhCounty
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
HUDProgCategory
maleAgeBel5_DisTotalCount
maleAge5to17_DisTotalCount
Total disabled males below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled males age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
maleAge18to34_DisTotalCount
Total disabled males age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
maleAge35to64_DisTotalCount
Total disabled males age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
maleAge65to74_DisTotalCount
Total disabled males age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
maleAge75Plus_DisTotalCount
Total disabled males age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if
the total is less than 10)
Total disabled males of any other age (not reported or over age
110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total disabled males of any age (including observations with
erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total disabled females below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled females age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled females age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
maleAgeOther_DisTotalCount
maleAllAges_DisTotalCount
femaleAgeBel5_DisTotalCount
femaleAge5to17_DisTotalCount
femaleAge18to34_DisTotalCount
femaleAge35to64_DisTotalCount
femaleAge65to74_DisTotalCount
femaleAge75Plus_DisTotalCount
Total disabled females age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled females age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if
the total is less than 10)
47
femaleAgeOther_DisTotalCount
femaleAllAges_DisTotalCount
totalAgeBel5_DisTotalCount
totalAge5to17_DisTotalCount
totalAge18to34_DisTotalCount
totalAge35to64_DisTotalCount
totalAge65to74_DisTotalCount
totalAge75Plus_DisTotalCount
totalAgeOther_DisTotalCount
totalAllAges_DisTotalCount
maleAgeBel5_DisHHs
maleAge5to17_DisHHs
maleAge18to34_DisHHs
maleAge35to64_DisHHs
maleAge65to74_DisHHs
maleAge75Plus_DisHHs
maleAgeOther_DisHHs
maleAllAges_DisHHs
femaleAgeBel5_DisHHs
femaleAge5to17_DisHHs
femaleAge18to34_DisHHs
femaleAge35to64_DisHHs
femaleAge65to74_DisHHs
Total disabled females of any other age (not reported or over age
110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total disabled females of any age (including observations with
erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total disabled persons below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less
than 10)
Total disabled persons age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled persons age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled persons age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled persons age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than
10)
Total disabled persons age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if
the total is less than 10)
Total disabled persons of any other age (not reported or over age
110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total disabled persons of any age (including observations with
erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male below age 5
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 5-17 (equals 1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 18-34 (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 35-64 (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 65-74 (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 75 or higher
(up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male of any age
(including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over
110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female below age 5
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 5-17 (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 18-34
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 35-64
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 65-74
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
48
femaleAge75Plus_DisHHs
femaleAgeOther_DisHHs
femaleAllAges_DisHHs
totalAgeBel5_DisHHs
totalAge5to17_DisHHs
totalAge18to34_DisHHs
totalAge35to64_DisHHs
totalAge65to74_DisHHs
totalAge75Plus_DisHHs
totalAgeOther_DisHHs
totalAllAges_DisHHs
Total households with at least one disabled female age 75 or higher
(up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female of any age
(including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over
110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person below age 5
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 5-17 (equals
-1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 18-34
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 35-64
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 65-74
(equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 75 or higher
(up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person of any age
(including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over
110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10)
DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY SEX BY AGE ( PER ASSISTED UNIT ). XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
Variable
Description
hhNation
hhState
hhCounty
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
HUDProgCategory
maleAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported
only in "PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and
dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj"
worksheet)
HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined)
Total disabled males below age 5 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
49
maleAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU
femaleAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU
Total disabled males age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled males age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled males age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled males age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled males age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to
age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the
numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled males of any other age (not reported or over age
110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of
disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled males of any age per assisted household (including
observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that
are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the
numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled females below age 5 per assisted household (equals 1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled females age 75 or higher per assisted household (up
to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled females of any other age (not reported or over age
110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of
disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled females of any age per assisted household (including
observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that
are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the
numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled persons below age 5 per assisted household (equals 1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled persons age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
50
than 10)
totalAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU
totalAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU
maleAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU
maleAge5to17_DisHHsPAU
maleAge18to34_DisHHsPAU
maleAge35to64_DisHHsPAU
maleAge65to74_DisHHsPAU
maleAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU
maleAgeOther_DisHHsPAU
maleAllAges_DisHHsPAU
femaleAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU
femaleAge5to17_DisHHsPAU
Total disabled persons age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled persons age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled persons age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1
if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less
than 10)
Total disabled persons age 75 or higher per assisted household (up
to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled persons of any other age (not reported or over age
110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of
disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total disabled persons of any age per assisted household (including
observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that
are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the
numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male below age 5 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 5-17 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 18-34 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 35-64 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 65-74 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male age 75 or higher
per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled male of any age per
assisted household (including observations with erroneous age
values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female below age 5 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 5-17 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
51
femaleAge18to34_DisHHsPAU
femaleAge35to64_DisHHsPAU
femaleAge65to74_DisHHsPAU
femaleAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU
femaleAgeOther_DisHHsPAU
femaleAllAges_DisHHsPAU
totalAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU
totalAge5to17_DisHHsPAU
totalAge18to34_DisHHsPAU
totalAge35to64_DisHHsPAU
totalAge65to74_DisHHsPAU
totalAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU
totalAgeOther_DisHHsPAU
totalAllAges_DisHHsPAU
Total households with at least one disabled female age 18-34 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 35-64 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 65-74 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female age 75 or higher
per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled female of any age per
assisted household (including observations with erroneous age
values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person below age 5 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 5-17 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 18-34 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 35-64 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 65-74 per
assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e.
the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person age 75 or higher
per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person of any other age
(not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if
the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
Total households with at least one disabled person of any age per
assisted household (including observations with erroneous age
values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total
number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10)
DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME . XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
Variable
Description
hhNation
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
52
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
hhState
hhCounty
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
HUDProgCategory
totalDisabledCount
L30_DisHHs
L50ButNotL30_DisHHs
L80ButNotL50_DisHHs
aboveL80_DisHHs
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported
only in "PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and
dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj"
worksheet)
HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined)
Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled
person (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled
person, for which household income is less than or equal to 30% of
HAMFI (i.e. total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or
ext_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y”, within the HUD longitudinal file)
(equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled
person, for which household income is greater than 30 percent, but
less than or equal to 50%, of HAMFI (i.e. ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt <
total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ very_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or
[very_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y” and ext_low_inc_lmt_indr does
not equal “Y”], within the HUD longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is
less than 10)
Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled
person, for which household income is greater than 50 percent, but
less than or equal to 80%, of HAMFI (i.e. very_low_inc_lmt_amnt <
total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ low_inc_lmt_amnt, within the HUD
longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled
person, for which household income is greater than or equal to 80
percent of HAMFI (i.e. total_annl_incm_amnt > low_inc_lmt_amnt
or no income information is given, within the HUD longitudinal file)
(equals -1 if value is less than 10)
DISABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENTS . XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
Variable
Description
hhNation
hhState
hhCounty
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
State FIPS (using unit_fips_state_cd from HUD longitudinal file;
reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets)
County FIPS (using unit_fips_cnty_cd from HUD longitudinal file;
reported only in "County" worksheet)
53
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
totDisabledPerPHHH
totalDisabledHHs
pctTotalDisabledHHs
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis
pctReqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis
recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis
recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis
pctRecvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis
reqstdAndRecvd_Dis
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from HUD longitudinal file; reported only in
"PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for TRACS observations and
dvlpt_num from 50058/MTW observations from HUD longitudinal
file; reported only in "Proj" worksheet)
Number of disabled persons per public housing househehold
(calculated as the summation of disabled individuals contained in all
public housing households, divided by the total number of public
housing households) (equals -1 if total number of units, i.e. the
denominator, is less than 10)
Number of public housing households with at least one disabled
person (i.e. the sum of public housing households (determined
using the methods outlined under variable totalPHObs)) with at
least one disabled person) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled
person (equals -1 if the numerator is less than 10)
Number of public housing households with at least one disabled
person requesting disability features (tallying the total number of
households for which either 1) acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or 2)
acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” through “6” (i.e. does not equal 0, nor
is blank), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if value is less
than 10)
Number of public housing households with no disabled persons
requesting disability features (determined using the method
previously outlined for the preceding variable,
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if
value is less than 10)
Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled
person requesting disability features (reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis times
100 divided by reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis plus
reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10)
Number of public housing households with at least one disabled
person receiving disability features (tallying the total number of
households for which acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2” [i.e. the
household fully - “1” - or partially - “2” - received accessibility
features that were requested]), within the HUD longitudinal file
(equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Number of public housing households with no disabled persons
receiving disability features (determined using the method
previously outlined for the preceding variable,
recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if
value is less than 10)
Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled
person receiving disability features (recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis times 100
divided by recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis plus recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis)
(equals -1 if numerator is less than 10)
Number of public housing households 1) with at least one disabled
person and 2) which requested accessibility features, which
ultimately received them
54
reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis
pctReqstdAndRecvd_Dis
pctReqstdAndRecvd_NoDis
totalPHObs
pctDisHHsWithAccssbltyFtrs
Number of public housing households 1) with no disabled persons
and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately
received them
Percent of public housing households 1) with at least one disabled
person and 2) which requested accessibility features, which
ultimately received them
Percent of public housing households 1) with no disabled persons
and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately
received them
Total public housing households (defined as households for which
the variable “pgm_type_cd” equals “P” and which, while not
labeled with pgm_type_cd “P”, share a property_id value with a
household which does have a pgm_type_cd of “P”) (equals -1 if
value is less than 10)
Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled
person receiving housing units with disability features (The value
from recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis multiplied by 100, then divided by
totalDisabledHHs) (equals -1 if either value in numerator, i.e.
recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, or the value in the denominator, i.e. the
number of units, is less than 10; is blank if the total number of
public housing households equals 0)
DISABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTS .XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
Variable
Description
hhNation
hhState
hhCounty
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
totalMFunits
totDisabledPerMFHH
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported
only in "PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and
dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj"
worksheet)
Total multifamily households (defined as all HUD-assisted
households designated, following the procedure outlined in Table 1,
for the following HUD program categories: Section 202, Section 811,
Section 236, multifamily programs breaking out Section 8, and “all
other”) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Number of disabled persons per multifamily household (i.e. the
variable totalDisabledHHs, divided by the variable totalMFunits)
(equals -1 if number of units, i.e. the denominator, is less than 10; is
blank if the total number of multifamily units is 0)
55
totalDisabledHHs
pctDisabledHHs
totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld
totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv
totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll
totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld
totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld
totalDisHHs_HIV
pctDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld
Number of households living in multifamily properties with at least
one disabled person (the sum of multifamily households
(determined using the methods outlined under variable
totalMFunits) with at least one disabled person) (equals -1 if value is
less than 10)
Percent of multifamily households with at least one disabled person
(the sum of multifamily households (totalDisabledHHs times 100,
divided by totalMFunits) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for the elderly and disabled
(calculated using method outlined under the variable
totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted
with the "eldrly_disabled_indicator" variable in the iREMS
dbo_owner_survey file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for the disabled exclusively
(calculated using method outlined under the variable
totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted
with the "exclusive_disabled_indicator" variable in the iREMS
dbo_owner_survey file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for the chronically mentally ill
(calculated using method outlined under the variable
totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted
with the "chronically_mentally_ill_ind" variable in the iREMS
dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less
than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for the physically disabled
(calculated using method outlined under the variable
totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted
with the "mobility_impairment_ind" or "other_impairment_ind"
variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file)
(equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for the developmentally disabled
(calculated using method outlined under the variable
totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted
with the "developmentally_disabled_ind" variable in the iREMS
dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less
than 10)
Number of households with at least one disabled person living in
multifamily properties designated for persons with HIV (calculated
using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs,
restricted to households in properties denoted with the "hiv_ind"
variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file)
(equals -1 if value is less than 10)
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for the elderly and disabled (i.e.
the variable totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld, multiplied by 100, divided by
the total number of households residing in units designated for the
elderly and disabled) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld is less
56
than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated
group equals 0)
pctDisHHs_DisbldExclsv
pctDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll
pctDisHHs_PhysDisbld
pctDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld
pctDisHHs_HIV
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for the disabled exclusively (i.e.
the variable totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv, multiplied by 100, divided by
the total number of households residing in units designated for the
disabled exclusively) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv is less
than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated
group equals 0)
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for the chronically mentally ill
(i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll, multiplied by 100,
divided by the total number of households residing in units
designated for the chronically mentally ill) (equals -1 if
totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll is less than 10; is blank if total occupied
units designated for designated group equals 0)
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for the physically disabled (i.e.
the variable totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld, multiplied by 100, divided by
the total number of households residing in units designated for the
physically disabled) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld is less than
10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group
equals 0)
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for the developmentally disabled
(i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld, multiplied by 100,
divided by the total number of households residing in units
designated for the developmentally disabled) (equals -1 if
totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld is less than 10; is blank if total occupied
units designated for designated group equals 0)
Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in
multifamily properties designated for persons with HIV (i.e. the
variable totalDisHHs_HIV, multiplied by 100, divided by the total
number of households residing in units designated for persons with
HIV) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_HIV is less than 10; is blank if total
occupied units designated for designated group equals 0)
ACCESSIBLE UNIT COUNT BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS.XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and
Project)
hhNation
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
hhState
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
hhCounty
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
57
hhPlace
hhPHA
hhProj
accessibleUnits_0to1Br
accessibleUnits_2Br
accessibleUnits_3Br
accessibleUnits_4plusBr
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported
only in "PHA" worksheet)
Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and
dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj"
worksheet)
The number of assisted households with 0 or 1 bedrooms inhabiting
either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e.
for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property
with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled
exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the
developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the
indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
The number of assisted households with 2 bedrooms inhabiting
either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e.
for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property
with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled
exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the
developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the
indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
The number of assisted households with 3 bedrooms inhabiting
either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e.
for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property
with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled
exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the
developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the
indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10)
The number of assisted households with 4 or more bedrooms
inhabiting either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as
accessible (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a
multifamily property with features designated for the
elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill,
the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons
with HIV (according to the indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is
less than 10)
UNAIDED INVENTORY .XLSX
NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place); for
definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A
hhNation
Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of
Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the
HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only)
hhState
State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County"
worksheets)
hhCounty
County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet)
hhPlace
Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD
longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet)
58
disHHsL30
disHHsL50
disHHsL80
disHHsOverL80
disHHsAll
pctDisHHsL30
pctDisHHsL50
pctDisHHsL80
pctDisHHsOverL80
AllHHs
Number of total disabled households, for which household income
is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the
number of non-disabled households in this income group [as
identified from the variable T6_est71 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 20082010 data] from the number of total households [as identified from
the sum of variables t16_est3 and t16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS,
2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled households, for which household income
is greater than 30%, but less than 50%, of HAMFI (estimated by
subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income
group [as identified from the variable T6_est75 in Table 6 of the
CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total households [as
identified from the sum of variables t16_est24 and t16_est109 from
Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled households, for which household income
is greater than 50%, but less than 80%, of HAMFI (estimated by
subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income
group [as identified from the variable T6_est79 in Table 6 of the
CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total households [as
identified from the sum of variables t16_est45 and t16_est130 from
Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled households, for which household income
is greater than 80% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number
of non-disabled households in this income group [as identified from
the variable T6_est83 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from
the number of total households [as identified from the sum of
variables t16_est66 and t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 20062010 data])
The sum of variable disHHsL30, disHHsL50, disHHsL80,
disHHsOverL80
Percent of total households, among which household income is less
than or equal to 30% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by
multiplying 100 by disHHsL30, then dividing by the number of total
households in this income group [t16_est3 + t16_est88 from Table
16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total households, among which household income is
greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI, which are
disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsL50, then dividing
by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est24
+ t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total households, among which household income is
greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI, which are
disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsL80, then dividing
by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est45
+ t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total households, among which household income is
greater than 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by
multiplying 100 by disHHsLOverL80, then dividing by the number of
total households in this income group [t16_est66 + t16_est151 from
Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
The count of all households (t16_est1 from Table 16 of CHAS, 20062010 data)
59
pctDisHHsAll
disRentersL30
disRentersL50
disRentersL80
disRentersOverL80
disRentersAll
pctDisRentersL30
pctDisRentersL50
pctDisRentersL80
pctDisRentersOverL80
disHHsAll, times 100, divided by the number of total households
(t16_est1)
Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household
income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI (estimated by
subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in this
income group [as identified from the variable T6_est157 in Table 6
of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting
households [as identified from the variablet16_est88 from Table 16
of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household
income is greater than 30%, but less than 50%, of HAMFI (estimated
by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in
this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est161 in
Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total
renting households [as identified from the variable t16_est109 from
Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household
income is greater than 50%, but less than 80%, of HAMFI (estimated
by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in
this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est165 in
Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total
renting households [as identified from the variable t16_est130 from
Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household
income is greater than 80% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the
number of non-disabled, renting households in this income group
[as identified from the variable T6_est169 in Table 6 of the CHAS,
2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting households [as
identified from the variable t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS,
2006-2010 data])
The sum of variable disRentersL30, disRentersL50, disRentersL80,
disRentersOverL80
Percent of total renting households, among which household
income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI, which are disabled
(estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL30, then dividing by
the number of total renting households this income group
[t16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total renting households, among which household
income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI,
which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL50,
then dividing by the number of total renting households this income
group [t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total renting households, among which household
income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI,
which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL80,
then dividing by the number of total renting households this income
group [t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
Percent of total renting households, among which household
income is greater than 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled
(estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersLOverL80, then dividing
by the number of total renting households this income group
[t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data])
60
AllRenters
pctDisRentersAll
unaidedDisHHsL30
unaidedDisHHsL50
unaidedDisHHsL80
unaidedDisHHsOverL80
unaidedDisHHsAll
pctUnaidedDisHHsL30
pctUnaidedDisHHsL50
pctUnaidedDisHHsL80
pctUnaidedDisHHsOverL80
pctUnaidedDisHHsAll
unaidedDisRentersL30
unaidedDisRentersL50
The count of all households (t16_est87 from Table 16 of CHAS,
2006-2010 data)
disRentersAll, times 100, divided by the number of total households
(t16_est87)
disHHsL30 minus L30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled
household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L30_DisHHs is less than 10)
disHHsL50 minus L50ButNotL30_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L50ButNotL30_DisHHs is less than 10)
disHHsL80 minus L80ButNotL50_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L80ButNotL50_DisHHs is less than 10)
disHHsOverL80 minus aboveL80_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
aboveL80_DisHHs is less than 10)
The sum of variable unaidedHHsL30, unaidedHHsL50,
unaidedHHsL80, unaidedHHsOverL80 (equals -1 if only one of the
following is equal to -1: unaidedDisHHsL30, unaidedDisHHsL50,
unaidedDisHHsL80, unaidedDisHHsOverL80)
unaidedDisHHsL30, times 100, divided by total household count for
this income group
unaidedDisHHsL50, times 100, divided by total household count for
this income group
unaidedDisHHsL80, times 100, divided by total household count for
this income group
unaidedDisHHsOverL80, times 100, divided by total household
count for this income group
unaidedDisHHsAll, times 100, divided by total household count
disRentersL30 minus L30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled
household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L30_DisHHs is less than 10)
disRentersL50 minus L50ButNotL30_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L50ButNotL30_DisHHs is less than 10)
unaidedDisRentersL80
disRentersL80 minus L80ButNotL50_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
L80ButNotL50_DisHHs is less than 10)
unaidedDisRentersOverL80
disRentersOverL80 minus aboveL80_DisHHs (provided from file
"disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if
aboveL80_DisHHs is less than 10)
unaidedDisRentersAll
The sum of variable unaidedRentersL30, unaidedRentersL50,
unaidedRentersL80, unaidedRentersOverL80 (equals -1 if only one
of the following is equal to -1: unaidedDisRentersL30,
unaidedDisRentersL50, unaidedDisRentersL80,
unaidedDisRentersOverL80)
unaidedDisRentersL30, times 100, divided by total household count
for this income group
unaidedDisRentersL50, times 100, divided by total renting
household count for this income group
pctUnaidedDisRentersL30
pctUnaidedDisRentersL50
61
pctUnaidedDisRentersL80
pctDisHHsUnaidedL30
unaidedDisRentersL80, times 100, divided by total renting
household count for this income group
unaidedDisRentersOverL80, times 100, divided by total renting
household count for this income group
unaidedDisRentersAll, times 100, divided by total renting household
count
unaidedDisHHsL30, times 100, divided by disHHsL30
pctDisHHsUnaidedL50
unaidedDisHHsL50, times 100, divided by disHHsL50
pctDisHHsUnaidedL80
unaidedDisHHsL80, times 100, divided by disHHsL80
pctDisHHsUnaidedOverL80
unaidedDisHHsOverL80, times 100, divided by disHHsOverL80
pctDisHHsUnaidedAll
unaidedDisHHsAll, times 100, divided by disHHsAll
pctDisRentersUnaidedL30
unaidedDisRentersL30, times 100, divided by disRentersL30
pctDisRentersUnaidedL50
unaidedDisRentersL50, times 100, divided by disRentersL50
pctDisRentersUnaidedL80
unaidedDisRentersL80, times 100, divided by disRentersL80
pctDisRentersUnaidedOverL80
unaidedDisRentersOverL80, times 100, divided by
disRentersOverL80
unaidedDisRentersAll, times 100, divided by disRentersAll
pctUnaidedDisRentersOverL80
pctUnaidedDisRentersAll
pctDisRentersUnaidedAll
pctDisVoucherHHsInDesigOrMs
pctDisMFHHsInDisProperty
pctDisPHHHsInAccblUnt
Percent of disabled HUD-assisted household in one of the five
housing voucher programs (tenant-based/other, project-based,
homeownership, designated, mainstream), whose voucher is either
part of the Designated or Mainstream voucher program (equals -1
if numerator is less than 10)
Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, households in a multifamily
property living within a multifamily property with disability features
(as indicated from iREMS) for the elderly+disabled, the disabled
exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the
developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (equals -1 if
numerator is less than 10)
Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, public housing households living
within a designated accessible unit (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr
equals "Y" in the HUD longitudinal data) (equals -1 if numerator is
less than 10)
62