Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

A Picture of Disability and Designated Housing

2015, SSRN Electronic Journal

A Picture of Disability and Designated Housing Multi-Disciplinary Research Team U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and Research A Picture of Disability and Designated Housing Multi-Disciplinary Research Team U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research March 6, 2015 Submitted by: Economic Systems Inc. Falls Church, Virginia Prepared by: Casey J. Dawkins, Ph.D., and Mark Miller National Center for Smart Growth University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland About MDRT PD&R developed the Multidisciplinary Research Team (MDRT) vehicle to manage a team of qualified researchers. Researchers are selected for their expertise to produce an array of high quality, short-turnaround research. MDRT researchers use a variety of HUD and external data sources to answer research questions relating to HUD’s priority policies and strategic goals. Disclaimer The contents of this report are the views of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. government. Table of Contents Introduction and Overview ............................................................................................................. 3 Background: HUD Programs Serving the Needs of the Disabled .................................................. 4 Defining Disability................................................................................................................ 5 Data and Research Methods............................................................................................................ 6 Prevalence of Disabilities in the U.S. and in HUD Programs ........................................................ 7 Availability of Assisted HUD Units in Relation to Need ............................................................. 17 Supply of and Demand for Accessible Assisted Units ....................................................... 20 Conclusions and Policy Implications ............................................................................................ 26 References ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Appendix A. Explanation of data products ................................................................................... 30 Data products derived from public summary files .............................................................. 30 Data products derived from HUD administrative data ....................................................... 32 Public Housing Statistics .................................................................................................... 36 Multifamily Assisted Program Statistics ............................................................................ 37 Assisted Unit Count ............................................................................................................ 39 Supply and Demand Statistics ............................................................................................ 39 Appendix B. Variable Codebook .................................................................................................. 42 List of Tables Table 1: Disabled persons per 1,000 occupied housing units by sex and age category ........... 8 Table 2: Disabled and nondisabled persons per 1000 occupied housing units by age, poverty status, and geography ...................................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands).......................................... 10 Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI ...................................................... 12 Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age ........... 14 Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUD-assisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) ................................. 16 i Table 7: Summary statistics, among HUD-assisted households in public housing ................ 18 Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics .................................................................................. 19 Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households ....................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) .... 23 ii Introduction and Overview This report examines the characteristics of federally-assisted housing designated for disabled households living in the U.S. Prior research suggests that disabled persons face significant challenges when trying to secure affordable, high quality housing. The 2009 “Worst Case Housing Needs of People with Disabilities” report (Souza et al. 2011) finds that renter households with nonelderly disabled members are more likely than nondisabled households to have very low incomes, experience worst case housing needs, pay more than 50 percent of their income on rent, and live in inadequate or overcrowded housing. The inadequate housing conditions of the disabled reflects both the relatively lower incomes and assets of disabled persons (She and Livermore 2009) combined with the lack of available housing with accessibility features. Hoffman and Livermore (2012) find that disabled persons also tend to live in less desirable neighborhoods than non-disabled persons. Such neighborhoods exhibit lower median incomes, lower fair market rents, poorer access to public services, and more neighborhood problems such as crime and heavy street noise. Due to their lower incomes, a significant share of disabled households are eligible to receive or already receive federal housing assistance from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). According to the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households (http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/picture/yearlydata.html), approximately 20 percent of households receiving assistance from HUD are disabled. Among those with household heads aged 62 or older, this percentage is twice as high (40 percent) and exhibits substantial variability across HUD program type. Given that the prevalence of disability within the U.S. is expected to increase over time with the aging of the baby boomer population, it is important to understand whether HUD’s assisted housing programs adequately address the growing needs of this population. This report sheds light on these issues. The objective of this research is to consolidate administrative data and survey data related to households with disabilities and designated housing in a form similar to the Picture of Subsidized Households, which presents information on HUD program participants by various levels of geography. We use these data to address the following research questions:  In HUD housing programs and the broader population, what are the prevalence and characteristics of households containing one or more persons with disabilities, by type of disability and geographic unit?  What is the availability of assisted units that the public housing authority or owner/managing agent has designated as accessible, in relation to the need at different geographic levels?  What policy recommendations are supported by the evidence on disability and designated units, and how should HUD data resources be revised to address future questions pertaining to disability? This report is structured as follows: The background section gives an overview of the major HUD programs designed to serve the needs of the disabled population. Next, we provide a brief description of the data relied upon for the analyses and research methods employed. The main 3 body of the report addresses the research questions posed above, with policy recommendations addressed in the conclusion section. Appendix A provides a detailed discussion of the methods and assumptions used to assemble the data analyzed in this report, and Appendix B provides a description of all variables assembled for the final analytical dataset (provided as a separate Excel file). Background: HUD Programs Serving the Needs of the Disabled We begin with an overview of HUD programs serving the disabled, followed by a discussion of how “disability” is defined in this report. All of HUD’s programs serve a portion of the disabled population. According to the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households, households with disabilities are most prevalent, 32 percent, in the Moderate Rehabilitation program,1 followed by the Housing Choice Voucher program, the Section 8 New Construction/Substantial Rehabilitation program, and the public housing program. The smallest percentages of disabled persons are served by the Section 236 and other multifamily programs. The Section 202 and Section 811 programs are the largest and longest standing programs targeted specifically to the needs of disabled persons. Section 202 was created in 1959 to house low income elderly persons aged 62 and older. The program provides low interest loans (and later project-based Section 8 rental assistance contracts) to nonprofit developers seeking to construct housing for families with elderly members. In 1964, handicapped persons were added to the definition of eligible elderly families. Until 1990, Section 202 served the needs of both elderly and disabled populations, although a separate set-aside was established in 1978 to focus specifically on the needs of nonelderly disabled individuals. That set-aside was expanded into the newly-created Section 811 program in 1990 to focus specifically on the needs of nonelderly disabled persons between 18 and 61. The funding mechanism also changed to emphasize capital grants rather than loans. The 2010 Frank Melville Supportive Housing Investment Act changed the manner in which Section 811 project rental assistance contracts (PRAC) could be used. Previously, these subsidies could only be tied to units developed using Section 811 capital grants. With the 2010 changes, PRACs could be used to subsidize multifamily units developed using other sources, including the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, HOME funds, and other sources. Programmatic changes were also implemented to encourage the integration of disabled households into the larger community. After 2010, disabled households living in multifamily units developed using Section 811 could only constitute 25 percent of the total number of units in the building (Perl 2013; Schwartz 2015). Disabled households may also qualify for tenant-based rental assistance. Under the Section 811 program, “mainstream” vouchers were created in 1992 to serve the needs of disabled households seeking housing in the private market. The funding for the mainstream voucher program was eventually absorbed by the Section 8 tenant-based voucher program. Beginning in 2005, HUD 1 Although the Moderate Rehabilitation program serves the highest percent of disabled households, this program serves few households compared to other HUD programs, so the total number of disabled persons served is quite small. 4 required voucher-administering agencies to help participants of the program find supportive services and provide assistance to landlords in making reasonable accommodations to serve the needs of disabled mainstream voucher holders. No new vouchers have been issued under this program since 2006. The Section 8 (now Housing Choice Voucher) program also provides tenant-based rental assistance targeted directly to families with a disabled adult in the household. These are often referred to as “designated” vouchers or vouchers for “certain developments.” Beginning with the 2010 Frank Melville Act, all mainstream and designated vouchers were to be made available to other disabled households upon turnover (Devine 2000; Perl 2013; Schwartz 2015). An important policy question of interest is the extent to which disabled households participate in programs specifically targeted to the disabled versus participating in other HUD programs. Since programs targeted to the disabled are often combined with supportive services, physical accommodations, and technical assistance to landlords for accommodating disability needs, participants in targeted HUD programs likely receive more accommodations than other HUD program participants. We address this issue later in the report. Defining Disability Although the HUD definition of disability has varied over time and across program category, our report relies on data from HUD’s most recent administrative records to characterize the disabled population and make comparisons with the characteristics of the larger disabled population living in the U.S. Varying definitions of disability across the two populations make such comparisons challenging. For the population at large, the American Community Survey includes questions about disability status. This report defines disability for the larger population based on the current definition first introduced in 2008. According to the U.S. Census, disabled persons are those exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics (https://www.census.gov/people/disability/methodology/acs.html):  Sensory Disability – Conditions that include blindness, deafness, or a severe vision or hearing impairment.  Physical Disability – Conditions that substantially limit one or more basic physical activities such as walking, climbing stairs, reaching, lifting, or carrying.  Mental Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6 months or more, the person has difficulty learning, remembering or concentrating.  Self-care Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6 months or more, the person has difficulty dressing, bathing, or getting around inside the home.  Go-outside-home Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6 months or more, the person has difficulty going outside the home alone to shop or visit a doctor's office.  Employment Disability – Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition lasting 6 months or more, the person has difficulty working at a job or business. 5 Most of HUD’s programs, on the other hand, do not distinguish among type of disability, although housing providers are to use the following criteria to identify disabled persons when reporting to HUD’s tenant-level administrative data systems:2  A disability as defined in section 223 of the Social Security Act.  A physical, mental, or emotional impairment, which is expected to be of long-continued and indefinite duration, substantially impedes his or her ability to live independently, and is of such a nature that such ability could be improved by more suitable housing conditions.  A developmental disability as defined in section 102 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act.  Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) or any condition that arises from the etiologic agent for AIDS. Since disability is often under-reported, we also include in our definition of the disabled HUDassisted population all those who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI), a federal income supplement designed to meet the needs of low-income disabled persons. We also present data using two indicators that provide additional information on the appropriateness of accessibility features for a person’s disability needs: (1) public housing residents may request disability features, and HUD’s tenant-level data identify whether these features are requested by and provided to public housing residents; (2) Several multi-family properties are specifically designed to meet the needs of specific types of disabilities experienced by HUD-assisted households. We report information describing both of these conditions to gain a better understanding of the match between disabled household needs and the accessibility characteristics of HUD units. Data and Research Methods Our analyses in this report consist primarily of various descriptive statistics for disabled households both within the U.S. at large and for U.S. households receiving HUD assistance. Where possible, we emphasize comparisons between these two groups. For all households, we present information for the U.S., for each Census region, and for central, outlying, and rural counties.3 Each table primarily presents information for either (1) the number of disabled persons per household, or (2) the number/percent of households containing disabled persons, depending on which is more appropriate. At the end of the report, we also present various 2 The HUD tenant-level data utilized for this project include data reported on the HUD-50058 form (completed by PHAs for each assisted household participating in PHA-administered programs as reported in the Public and Indian Housing Information Center (PIC) data) and HUD-50059 form (completed by private housing providers for assisted households participating in HUD Office of Housing-administered “multifamily” programs as reported in the Tenant Rental Assistance Certification System (TRACS) data). Throughout the report, “central counties” refer to all counties within 2013 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) that contain the largest portion of the CBSA’s urbanized area; “outlying” counties include all other counties within the CBSA; and “rural” counties include counties outside of 2013 CBSAs. 3 6 measures of the supply and demand for disabled housing units, which we describe in sections to follow. Statistics presented for HUD-assisted households are further disaggregated by program type and PHA size. Data sources for statistics presented to describe disabled households in the U.S. include the most recently available American Community Survey (ACS) 2009-2013 5-year sample and the most recently available HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) sample (20082010 3-year sample and 2006-2010 5-year sample, depending on the availability of the data being examined). The data used to describe HUD-assisted households living in the U.S. are constructed from HUD administrative databases, including HUD’s 2013 longitudinal household and member files (PIC and TRACS) and the Integrated Real Estate Management System (iREMs) multifamily property database. We match the household-level files to iREMS to characterize the units and properties where disabled persons reside. Prevalence of Disabilities in the U.S. and in HUD Programs Research Question: In HUD housing programs and the broader population, what are the prevalence and characteristics of households containing one or more persons with disabilities, by type of disability and geographic unit? We begin with an examination of the prevalence of disability among all U.S. households, using data from the 2009-2013 ACS. Table 1 displays the number of disabled persons per 1000 households by sex and age category. Table 1 and the following tables also display the total number of HUD-assisted units. We present the information for the U.S.; all major Census regions; and for central counties, outlying counties and rural counties. In the U.S. population at large, there are roughly 322 disabled persons per 1000 households.4 The ratio of disabled persons to households varies somewhat by Census region, with the highest number found in the South and the lowest in the Northeast. Comparing central, outlying and rural counties, we find that the ratio is highest in rural areas and lowest in more urban, central counties. Table 1 shows that of the 322 disabled persons per 1000 households, 167 are female and 154 are male. Breaking down the results by age in addition to sex reveals that below age 18, more of the disabled individuals are male rather than female (16 versus 10); for ages 18–64, male and female shares are equal (84 versus 84); and above age 65, a greater share are female (54 males versus 74 females). As before, disabled persons of both sexes are more commonly found among households in the South and in rural areas. Ratios of disabled persons per 1000 households are affected by both the size of the age subgroups and the prevalence of disabilities among individuals of those subgroups. Senior individuals are most likely to have a disability, yet the working-age population (age 18-64) 4 Limitations of the data make it difficult to estimate the proportion of households that contain at least one disabled person without double-counting. Tables 3 and 4 indicate the proportion of households having individuals with specific disabilities. 7 accounts for 168 of the 322 disabled persons per 1000 households. Seniors are next with 128 disabled persons, and children account for a much smaller share, 26 disabled persons. This pattern holds for all geographic areas. For all age groups regardless of sex, the ratio of disabled persons to households is highest in the South and in rural areas, although less variable across regions compared with the household population at large. Table 1: Disabled persons per 1,000 occupied housing units by sex and age category Northeast M idwest Region Region 300 309 24 26 150 162 125 121 2,309 2,229 556 586 1,511 1,423 242 221 South Region 349 28 186 135 2,300 619 1,464 217 West Region 305 23 157 125 2,497 674 1,604 219 Central counties 309 25 161 123 2,353 616 1,517 220 Outlying counties 367 30 197 140 2,291 623 1,439 229 Rural counties 435 29 226 179 2,057 550 1,249 258 Total Disabled Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ Total Non-Disabled Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ U.S. 322 26 168 128 2,329 612 1,494 223 Disabled M ales Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ Non-Disabled M ales Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ 154 16 84 54 1,140 310 731 99 139 15 74 50 1,124 281 736 107 150 16 82 52 1,094 296 700 97 167 17 92 57 1,118 313 708 97 149 15 80 54 1,236 342 795 100 147 16 80 51 1,151 312 741 98 181 19 100 63 1,125 315 705 104 221 18 118 84 1,011 279 616 116 Disabled Females Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ Non-Disabled Females Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65+ 167 10 84 74 1,189 302 764 123 161 9 77 75 1,185 275 775 136 159 9 80 69 1,135 290 722 123 182 11 94 78 1,182 306 756 120 157 9 77 71 1,260 332 810 119 163 9 81 72 1,202 304 776 122 185 11 97 77 1,167 307 734 125 214 11 108 95 1,046 271 633 142 Total HUD assisted units (thousands) 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 Source: American Community Survey, 5-year sample, 2009-2013; HUD longitudinal data from the TRACS system and public housing databases (form 50058 and the M TW program), 2013, household and member files. Table 2 displays estimates of disabled and non-disabled persons per 1,000 households by age and poverty status. Non-poor households contribute the majority, 249, of the 320 disabled individuals per 1,000 households. Yet disability is more prevalent among the poor: 17.6 percent of individuals in poor households are disabled, compared with only 11.2 percent of individuals in non-poor households. The primary reason that non-poor households contribute most disabled individuals is that non-poor households represent 84.6 percent of the population. In addition, the disabled poor population includes a larger number of elderly disabled persons living in singleperson households. In fact, we find that 51.5 percent of elderly persons in poor households have disabilities, compared with only 35.0 percent of elderly persons in non-poor households. 8 Table 2: Disabled and nondisabled persons per 1000 occupied housing units by age, poverty status, and geography5 Total Total Disabled In Poverty Not In Poverty Total Non-Disabled In Poverty Not In Poverty Total Below Age 18 Total Disabled Below Age 18 In Poverty Not In Poverty Total Non-Disabled Below Age 18 In Poverty Not In Poverty U.S. 2,620 320 71 249 2,300 332 1,968 Northeast M idwest Region Region 2,568 2,505 298 308 64 68 234 240 2,270 2,197 270 297 2,000 1,900 South Region 2,621 348 81 267 2,274 363 1,910 West Region 2,779 304 63 241 2,474 368 2,106 Central counties 2,630 308 68 240 2,322 335 1,987 Outlying Rural counties counties 2,631 2,471 365 434 77 109 289 325 2,266 2,037 290 345 1,975 1,692 629 25 8 17 573 24 7 16 602 25 8 17 639 27 10 18 687 23 7 16 633 25 8 17 643 29 9 20 569 29 11 17 604 549 577 611 665 608 614 541 128 477 97 452 114 463 144 467 139 526 128 480 116 499 140 401 Total Age 18-64 Total Disabled Age 18-64 In Poverty Not In Poverty Total Non-Disabled Age 18-64 In Poverty Not In Poverty 1,640 167 46 121 1,473 189 1,285 1,627 149 41 108 1,478 156 1,323 1,561 161 46 115 1,399 170 1,230 1,631 186 52 133 1,446 202 1,244 1,747 156 41 116 1,591 213 1,378 1,655 160 44 116 1,495 191 1,303 1,618 196 50 146 1,422 160 1,263 1,464 226 70 156 1,238 182 1,056 Total Age 65 And Above Total Disabled Age 65 And Above In Poverty Not In Poverty Total Non-Disabled Age 65 And Above In Poverty Not In Poverty 351 368 342 352 344 343 369 437 128 125 121 135 125 123 140 179 17 111 16 109 14 107 19 116 15 110 16 107 17 123 28 152 223 242 221 217 219 220 229 258 16 206 17 225 14 207 18 199 16 203 16 204 15 214 23 236 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 Total HUD assisted units (thousands) Source: American Community Survey, 5-year sample, 2009-2013; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 5 The totals in this table represent persons for whom poverty information is available and do not precisely match the totals from Table 1. 9 Tables 3 and 4 use CHAS data to examine the number and proportion of households that include persons with specific types of disabilities by tenure status and household income as a percent of HUD-Adjusted Median Family Income (HAMFI). HUD categorizes incomes up to 30 percent of HAMFI as extremely low income, up to 50 percent of HAMFI as very low income, up to 80 percent of HAMFI as low-income, and greater than 80 percent of HAMFI as moderate income or higher. Totals are displayed in Table 3, and percentages of households within each row are displayed in Table 4. Because the total number of households varies for each category, we focus our interpretation on the percentages displayed in Table 4. For each disability type, the prevalence of disability is highest among households with the lowest incomes (Table 4). Generally, the percentage of households with hearing or vision impairments is largest in the South and in rural areas, but some differences emerge when we consider different types of disability. Among all households, the percentage of households with members that experience cognitive and self-care or independent living limitations is highest in the South. Interestingly, the geographic distribution of all types of disabilities varies when we consider renter households only. For these households, all types of disability are more prevalent in the Midwest than in other Census regions. Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands) U.S. Northeast M idwest Region Region South Region West Region Central counties Outlying counties Rural counties Tenure: All 114,597 20,964 25,968 42,377 25,288 99,954 7,112 3,824 Hearing or vision impairment 12,680 2,099 2,784 5,077 2,720 10,594 901 626 ≤ 30% HAM FI 2,143 446 439 811 447 1,849 135 92 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 2,099 361 473 839 426 1,734 148 112 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 2,489 385 583 991 530 2,050 184 134 income > 80% HAM FI 5,949 907 1,289 2,435 1,317 4,961 434 288 Ambulatory limitation 16,241 2,803 3,506 6,709 3,224 13,644 1,140 793 ≤ 30% HAM FI 3,492 763 727 1,319 683 3,004 219 145 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 2,986 520 669 1,233 564 2,466 211 162 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 3,192 498 738 1,330 626 2,641 233 173 income > 80% HAM FI 6,571 1,021 1,372 2,827 1,351 5,533 477 315 Cognitive limitation 9,605 1,676 2,124 3,866 1,940 8,172 669 445 ≤ 30% HAM FI 2,461 528 545 901 486 2,144 152 101 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 1,864 313 414 766 371 1,567 128 94 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 1,070 162 263 463 182 859 85 66 income > 80% HAM FI 4,211 673 902 1,735 901 3,602 304 183 Self-care or independent living 12,148 2,172 2,626 4,853 2,497 10,380 818 549 limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI 2,708 592 572 988 555 2,357 166 104 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 2,222 395 495 898 434 1,864 151 113 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 2,356 378 540 959 479 1,982 167 119 income > 80% HAM FI 4,862 807 1,019 2,008 1,028 4,176 334 213 Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 10 Table 3: Number of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI (in thousands) (continued) Tenure: Renters Hearing or vision impairment ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Ambulatory limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Cognitive limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Self-care or independent living limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Tenure: Owners Hearing or vision impairment ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Ambulatory limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Cognitive limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Self-care or independent living limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI U.S. 39,039 3,852 1,299 879 737 936 5,667 2,220 1,318 1,004 1,125 4,266 1,728 959 761 818 Northeast M idwest South Region Region Region 7,678 7,747 13,759 744 793 1,399 306 268 439 165 196 321 125 161 273 149 169 366 1,176 1,208 2,045 552 471 743 256 301 483 176 224 377 192 213 441 839 932 1,527 411 391 570 174 218 355 126 165 286 128 158 317 West Region 9,855 916 286 198 179 253 1,238 454 278 228 279 968 356 213 183 216 Central counties 35,420 3,372 1,157 752 640 823 4,958 1,965 1,128 872 994 3,758 1,540 829 665 724 Outlying counties 1,808 215 66 52 43 54 312 116 77 57 62 238 92 55 44 48 Rural counties 938 140 43 37 30 31 209 73 57 41 38 153 58 39 29 27 4,321 889 929 1,503 1,000 3,813 230 148 1,751 1,001 753 817 428 194 131 137 379 227 167 156 562 356 273 311 382 224 182 212 1,561 864 660 728 89 57 40 43 53 40 29 27 75,558 8,828 844 1,219 1,752 5,013 10,574 1,271 1,667 2,188 5,447 5,339 733 904 309 3,392 13,286 1,355 140 196 260 759 1,626 211 263 322 829 838 117 139 36 545 18,220 1,991 171 277 423 1,121 2,297 256 368 514 1,159 1,192 153 197 98 744 28,618 3,677 372 518 718 2,069 4,664 576 749 953 2,387 2,338 331 411 177 1,419 15,434 1,804 161 229 351 1,064 1,986 229 286 399 1,072 971 130 158 -2 685 64,534 7,222 691 982 1,411 4,138 8,685 1,039 1,338 1,769 4,539 4,414 605 738 193 2,878 5,304 686 69 96 141 380 828 103 133 176 415 430 60 73 41 256 2,885 486 49 75 104 258 585 72 105 132 277 292 43 55 38 156 7,827 1,283 1,697 3,350 1,498 6,567 588 401 957 1,221 1,604 4,045 164 201 247 670 193 268 373 863 426 542 685 1,696 174 210 298 816 795 1,001 1,322 3,448 77 94 127 290 52 73 90 186 Total HUD assisted units 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 (thousands) Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 11 Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI U.S. Tenure: All Hearing or vision impairment ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Ambulatory limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Cognitive limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Self-care or independent living limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Tenure: Renters Hearing or vision impairment ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Ambulatory limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Cognitive limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Self-care or independent living limitation Northeast M idwest South Region Region Region West Central Outlying Rural Region counties counties counties 11.1 15.0 15.8 13.3 8.8 14.2 24.4 22.4 17.0 9.7 8.4 17.2 14.0 5.7 6.2 10.0 14.9 14.6 11.9 7.4 13.4 25.6 21.0 15.5 8.3 8.0 17.7 12.7 5.0 5.5 10.7 14.4 16.1 13.2 8.3 13.5 23.9 22.8 16.6 8.8 8.2 17.9 14.1 5.9 5.8 12.0 15.8 17.0 14.4 9.7 15.9 25.7 24.9 19.3 11.2 9.2 17.6 15.5 6.7 6.9 10.8 14.2 14.4 12.5 8.9 12.8 21.6 19.1 14.8 9.1 7.7 15.4 12.5 4.3 6.1 10.6 14.5 15.1 12.6 8.4 13.7 23.6 21.4 16.3 9.3 8.2 16.9 13.6 5.3 6.1 12.8 17.3 18.4 15.7 10.1 16.2 28.0 26.3 19.8 11.1 9.5 19.4 16.0 7.2 7.1 16.3 20.0 22.2 19.5 13.2 20.7 31.6 32.1 25.1 14.4 11.6 22.1 18.7 9.7 8.4 10.6 18.9 16.7 12.6 7.2 10.4 19.8 16.0 11.7 6.6 10.1 18.8 16.9 12.2 6.6 11.5 19.3 18.2 13.9 8.0 9.9 17.6 14.7 11.3 6.9 10.4 18.5 16.2 12.2 7.1 11.6 21.2 18.8 14.2 7.8 14.3 22.8 22.4 17.3 9.8 10.1 13.7 12.8 9.4 6.7 14.9 23.4 19.1 12.8 8.1 11.2 18.2 13.9 9.7 5.9 9.9 14.4 12.4 8.9 5.5 15.6 25.9 19.3 12.5 7.1 11.1 19.3 13.1 9.0 4.8 10.5 13.3 13.5 9.8 6.9 15.9 23.3 20.7 13.6 8.7 12.3 19.3 15.0 10.0 6.4 10.4 13.9 13.3 9.8 7.2 15.2 23.5 20.1 13.5 8.7 11.4 18.0 14.7 10.3 6.3 9.5 13.1 11.6 8.9 6.8 12.9 20.8 16.3 11.3 7.5 10.1 16.3 12.5 9.1 5.8 9.7 13.4 12.2 9.0 6.5 14.3 22.7 18.3 12.3 7.8 10.9 17.8 13.4 9.4 5.7 12.3 15.2 15.6 11.4 8.9 17.8 26.8 23.0 15.1 10.2 13.6 21.1 16.4 11.6 7.9 15.2 18.2 19.4 15.2 10.1 22.6 31.2 29.6 20.9 12.6 16.5 24.7 20.6 14.6 8.9 11.3 11.8 12.3 11.2 10.4 11.0 13.1 16.1 ≤ 30% HAM FI 18.4 20.1 18.7 17.8 17.5 18.0 20.6 22.5 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 14.5 14.6 15.6 14.8 13.2 14.0 17.1 20.8 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 9.6 9.3 10.1 9.8 9.0 9.3 10.6 14.8 income > 80% HAM FI 5.9 5.1 6.4 6.2 5.7 5.7 7.1 8.9 Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 12 Table 4: Percentage of households with at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income as a percent of HAMFI (continued) U.S. Tenure: Owners Hearing or vision impairment ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Ambulatory limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Cognitive limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Self-care or independent living limitation ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Northeast M idwest South Region Region Region West Central Outlying Rural Region counties counties counties 11.6 17.5 19.0 16.0 9.3 13.9 26.4 26.0 20.0 10.1 7.0 15.2 14.1 2.8 6.3 10.1 16.4 17.1 14.3 7.9 12.2 24.6 23.0 17.7 8.7 6.3 13.7 12.1 2.0 5.7 10.8 16.8 18.7 15.2 8.6 12.5 25.1 24.8 18.5 8.8 6.5 15.0 13.3 3.5 5.7 12.8 18.9 20.4 17.5 10.3 16.2 29.2 29.6 23.2 11.9 8.1 16.8 16.2 4.3 7.0 11.6 16.6 18.3 15.8 9.5 12.7 23.6 22.8 18.0 9.6 6.2 13.4 12.6 -0.1 6.1 11.1 17.0 18.4 15.5 8.9 13.4 25.6 25.1 19.4 9.8 6.8 14.9 13.9 2.1 6.2 12.9 19.9 20.5 17.7 10.3 15.6 29.4 28.6 22.0 11.3 8.1 17.2 15.7 5.2 6.9 16.7 21.9 24.0 21.3 13.7 20.1 32.1 33.7 26.8 14.7 10.0 19.5 17.5 7.7 8.3 10.3 19.9 19.0 14.7 7.5 9.6 19.1 17.6 13.6 7.0 9.2 19.0 18.1 13.4 6.6 11.7 21.7 21.4 16.7 8.4 9.6 17.9 16.8 13.4 7.3 10.1 19.6 18.8 14.5 7.4 11.1 22.1 20.1 15.9 7.9 13.8 23.2 23.4 18.2 9.9 Total HUD assisted units 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 (thousands) Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files Turning now to HUD-assisted households, Table 5 displays the number of disabled persons per 1,000 HUD-assisted units, broken down by sex, age, geographic area, Public Housing Agency (PHA) size, and HUD program type. In contrast to the results for all U.S. households, there are more disabled persons per HUD-assisted household in the West and in central counties. Large PHAs are also likely to serve larger numbers of disabled persons. Interestingly, regional variations fluctuate with the age of disabled household members, with greater ratios of young disabled household members (age <18) found in the South, and greater ratios of working-aged and elderly disabled household members found in the West. We also find greater ratios of working-aged disabled persons in rural counties. There are many more disabled females per 1,000 HUD-assisted households than there are disabled males. This partly reflects the prevalence of female-headed households in the larger population of HUD-assisted households (77 percent of HUD-assisted households, according to the 2013 Picture of Subsidized Households). Ratios of disabled females are greater in outlying counties, particularly among those of working age. For both males and females, ratios of disabled children and disabled elderly persons are greater in the South. 13 Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large Region Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs 434 385 387 465 408 403 404 401 452 509 39 29 41 29 36 25 19 15 24 50 289 299 275 311 284 308 313 296 336 332 106 57 71 126 87 69 73 89 91 126 Total disabled persons Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above U.S. 407 35 286 86 Total disabled males Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 153 23 105 25 163 26 106 31 150 19 114 17 140 27 94 19 183 18 123 41 154 24 105 26 144 17 109 18 151 12 118 21 152 10 114 28 164 15 123 26 187 33 117 37 Total disabled females Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 254 12 181 60 272 13 183 75 236 10 185 40 248 14 181 52 282 10 188 85 254 13 180 61 259 9 199 51 253 7 194 52 249 6 182 61 288 9 213 65 322 17 215 89 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 60 Total HUD assisted units (thousands) 316 2,854 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age (continued) Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Public Vouchers: TenantVouchers: Vouchers: Vouchers: Vouchers: Housing Based and All Other "Designated" M ainstream Project-Based Homeownership Total disabled persons 428 524 1,077 1,113 491 552 Below Age 18 29 58 39 27 23 63 Age 18-64 280 343 950 870 325 410 Age 65 and above 120 123 88 216 143 78 Total disabled males Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 169 19 111 40 184 38 112 33 388 25 337 26 406 16 328 62 220 14 153 53 200 39 138 24 Total disabled females Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 259 10 169 80 340 20 230 90 689 14 614 62 707 11 543 154 271 9 172 90 352 24 273 55 1,072 2,019 43 9 55 10 Total HUD assisted units (thousands) Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 14 Table 5: Number of disabled members per 1000 HUD-assisted units by sex and age (continued) All Housing M ultifamily Choice Assisted Programs Section 8 All Voucher Breaking Out M oderate M ultifamily Programs Rehabilitation Section 202 Section 811 Section 236 Section 8 Programs Total disabled persons 537 500 109 843 158 193 186 Below Age 18 56 15 0 2 11 8 7 Age 18-64 357 370 108 841 146 185 180 Age 65 and above 123 114 0 1 0 0 0 Total disabled males Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 190 37 119 34 277 10 211 55 54 0 54 0 464 1 463 0 64 7 57 0 80 5 75 0 82 4 77 0 Total disabled females Below Age 18 Age 18-64 Age 65 and above 347 20 238 89 223 5 159 59 54 0 54 0 379 1 378 0 94 4 90 0 113 3 110 0 105 2 102 0 2136 34 271 164 911 1377 Total HUD assisted units (thousands) 31 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files When we examine the prevalence of disabled persons by HUD program, we find that it is highest in the mainstream voucher program, which is somewhat expected given that this program is specifically targeted to households with disabled persons. Considering programs not targeted to the needs of the disabled, the prevalence of disabled persons is highest in the Housing Choice Voucher program. Since there are no special accommodations to ensure that these households receive necessary disability accommodations, this is potentially a source of concern. These results generally hold true regardless of the age or sex of disabled persons. Table 6 displays the number of households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUD-assisted units by income as a percent of HAMFI. As might be expected, the prevalence of disability is highest for the lowest income households, regardless of geographic location or PHA size. Disabled households with the lowest incomes, which are especially likely to include nonwage sources of income, are most prevalent in Northeastern and rural counties, while those with higher incomes are more prevalent in outlying Western counties and in medium-sized PHAs. Interestingly, while the prevalence of disability in the Section 811 program is higher for higher income households, for all other HUD programs, disabled households are more prevalent among lower income categories. Again, the Housing Choice Voucher program serves a larger proportion of disabled persons than other HUD programs not geared towards the needs of the disabled, regardless of income. 15 Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) U.S. Total Household income ≤30% HAM FI Household income <30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI Household income >50%, ≤80% HAM FI Household income ≥80% HAM FI Total HUD assisted units (thousands) Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large Region Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs 416.75 433.44 411.34 405.70 457.76 416.25 424.11 431.92 398.02 447.72 472.54 440.63 478.47 436.87 418.57 472.45 440.47 440.25 453.00 449.96 469.59 495.55 368.91 334.00 354.61 388.45 422.30 364.91 395.87 411.02 363.32 433.29 435.16 261.54 222.36 250.52 298.65 305.58 258.45 300.12 287.64 254.76 314.05 287.68 201.83 174.00 199.10 250.84 247.32 197.68 255.71 233.41 195.63 247.37 205.81 4,619 1,240 970 1,488 801 4,179 203 217 60 316 2,854 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) (continued) Total Household income ≤30% HAM FI Household income <30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI Household income >50%, ≤80% HAM FI Household income ≥80% HAM FI Total HUD assisted units (thousands) Public Housing 412.01 Housing Choice Vouchers: TenantBased and All Other 484.19 Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Housing Choice Vouchers: Vouchers: Vouchers: Vouchers: "Designated" M ainstream Project-Based Homeownership 980.58 999.55 483.50 484.92 440.21 503.82 982.07 999.44 514.19 643.44 382.38 446.71 975.94 1000.00 392.68 437.59 270.09 304.73 948.07 1000.00 289.44 250.43 204.12 238.48 925.93 1000.00 195.12 224.49 1,072 2,019 43 9 55 10 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files 16 Table 6: Number of HUD-assisted households containing at least one disabled person per 1000 HUDassisted units, by household income (as a percent of HAMFI) (continued) Total Household income ≤30% HAM FI Household income <30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI Household income >50%, ≤80% HAM FI Household income ≥80% HAM FI Total HUD assisted units (thousands) All Housing Section 8 Choice Voucher M oderate Programs Rehabilitation 496.39 491.50 Section 202 204.46 M ultifamily Assisted Section Section Programs Breaking Out Section 8 811 236 986.30 255.24 305.85 All M ultifamily Programs 295.02 517.03 502.03 233.06 986.26 277.97 324.26 318.55 456.52 408.76 143.35 986.96 216.08 257.98 236.34 309.43 234.50 142.62 981.57 125.61 182.02 171.64 242.12 277.78 148.33 1,000.00 76.74 118.69 110.18 2,136 34 1640 911 1,377 271 31 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files Availability of Assisted HUD Units in Relation to Need Research Question: What is the availability of assisted units that the public housing authority or owner/managing agent has designated as accessible, in relation to the need at different geographic levels? Table 7 presents various statistics for those participating in the public housing program. Within this program, the number of disabled persons per 1000 public housing units is highest in central Northeastern counties managed by large PHAs. Roughly 41 percent of public housing units contain at least one disabled person, and this percentage varies little across geographic area. The third row from the bottom presents the percentage of households with at least one disabled person which requested disability features and ultimately received them in their public housing unit. Only 30 percent of households with at least one disabled person requesting such amenities actually received them. This percentage is highest in the West, where 77 percent of those requesting disability features received them, and lowest in the South, where only 11 percent of those requesting disability features received them. Central counties and large PHAs are the most successful in matching disabled households with their requested accommodations. Looking at the second to last row in Table 7, we find that a surprisingly low percentage (3 percent) of disabled households living in public housing were actually reported as receiving units with accessibility features, regardless of whether accessible units were requested. The highest percentages are in outlying Western counties and in large PHAs. 17 Table 7: Summary statistics, among HUD-assisted households in public housing U.S. Number of disabled persons per 1000 public housing households Percent of households with at least one disabled person Percent of households, among those which requested disability features, with at least one disabled person Percent of households, among those which received disability features, with at least one disabled person Percent of households, among those 1) with at least one disabled person and 2) which requested disability features, which ultimately received them Percent of households, among those 1) with no disabled persons and 2) which requested disability features, which ultimately received them Percent of households, among those with at least one disabled person, which received housing units with disability features Total HUD-assisted, public housing units (thousands) Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large Region Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs 449 496 459 436 482 455 417 407 385 422 458 41.2 44.1 43.4 40.7 44.3 41.6 39.2 38.4 36.4 39.8 41.8 43.6 61.0 48.3 37.8 71.8 45.5 37.2 35.7 38.8 36.6 46.9 60.3 63.0 61.6 61.7 92.1 60.9 50.5 59.3 70.3 52.9 61.3 30.3 53.8 39.5 11.4 76.6 33.4 17.1 14.5 24.8 17.1 35.2 15.4 49.4 23.0 4.3 16.8 17.9 9.9 5.5 6.7 8.8 19.7 3.4 3.8 2.2 2.2 6.5 3.4 3.6 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.5 1,072 361 199 370 86 944 48 75 47 160 854 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files Table 8 present various statistics for those participating in HUD’s multifamily programs. Since HUD multifamily program participants were not asked whether they have requested disability features, we do not present this information, but we do present the percent of households residing in properties with units designated for the disabled, by multifamily program. In contrast to the public housing program, we find greater ratios of disabled multifamily program participants per 1,000 units in Midwestern and rural counties. Ratios of disabled persons are greater in units designated for the chronically mentally ill and less in units designated for the elderly and disabled. Breaking multifamily programs down by various HUD program categories, we find that the average size of the disabled population is highest among multifamily assisted programs specifically designed to serve the needs of the disabled. The Section 811 program serves the largest number of disabled persons per unit. Approximately 99 percent of those participating in the Section 811 program live in households with at least one disabled person. In the Section 202 and 811 programs, the largest shares of households living in properties with units designated exclusively for the disabled are indeed disabled, while in other multifamily assisted programs, properties with units designated for the chronically mentally ill house the largest share of households with at least one disabled person. 18 Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics U.S. Number of disabled persons per 1000 multifamily units Percent of multifamily households with at least one disabled person Northeast M idwest South West Central Outlying Rural Small M edium Large Region Region Region Region counties counties counties PHAs PHAs PHAs 303 310 329 302 267 297 334 380 1000 221 316 30 30 32 30 26 29 33 37 100 22 31 Percent of households with at least one disabled person, among those residing in multifamily housing units designed for… the elderly and disabled 36 31 41 40 32 35 41 46 the disabled exclusively the chronically mentally ill the physically disabled the developmentally disabled persons with HIV 87 75 85 94 90 87 91 91 53 96 98 97 94 98 96 94 98 75 70 53 72 68 93 69 90 65 75 91 82 99 90 97 92 98 83 50 86 100 98 70 94 86 1,298 324 355 404 192 1,169 Total HUD-assisted, multifamily units (thousands) 100 7 58 50 62 65 0 0 3 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database Table 8: Multifamily housing statistics (continued) Number of disabled persons per 1000 multifamily units Section 202 Section 811 Section 236 219 999 264 313 314 22 99 26 31 31 Percent of multifamily households with at least one disabled person Percent of households with at the elderly and disabled the disabled exclusively the chronically mentally ill the physically disabled the developmentally disabled persons with HIV Total HUD-assisted, multifamily units (thousands) M ultifamily assisted programs breaking out Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers: Project-Based least one disabled person, among those residing in multifamily housing units designed for… 26 98 42 39 56 90 99 30 66 53 85 98 34 98 79 242 83 75 45 75 99 75 50 97 48 50 870 4 25 44 157 Sources: HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database 19 Supply of and Demand for Accessible Assisted Units Table 9 presents various indicators of the supply and demand for accessible HUD-assisted units. Within the tenant-based voucher, multifamily, and public housing programs, we present the percent of disabled HUD-assistance recipients that live in units specifically designated for the disabled by geography to identify the extent to which the needs of the disabled population are being met in these HUD programs.6 The bottom rows display, by income, the total and percent of households with at least one disabled person, the total and percent of households with at least one disabled person minus those receiving HUD assistance, and the percent of the disabled population not receiving HUD assistance. These rows are further provided for two groups: the first for all households, and the second for all rental households. The final row gives an estimate of the percent of households with disabled persons who would qualify for HUD assistance based on income alone but who do not receive any HUD assistance. We find that in the tenant-based voucher program, less than five percent of disabled households receive assistance from a tenant-based program specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled. This percentage varies little by geography. This is a source of concern, because such vouchers do not come with supportive services or other accommodations to meet the needs of the disabled population. Furthermore, upon turnover, these vouchers may not be made available to other disabled households. In public housing, the percentage is somewhat higher, but still quite low (8 percent). In Western counties, more than 10 percent of disabled persons live in public housing units with accessibility features. The multifamily program has the highest percent of disabled households living in properties with units designated for the disabled (48 percent). This percentage is highest in the Midwest and in rural counties. Turning to the bottom rows in Table 9, we find that a substantial percentage of the disabled population does not receive HUD assistance. Even among those with extremely low incomes (<30% of HAMFI), more than 70 percent of all households and 50 percent of all renting households in particular do not receive HUD assistance. For both groups, this percentage is highest in outlying counties and within the South. 6 These percentages refer to the proportion (prevalence) living in designated units for given level of geography and not the share of such households found in each geography. 20 Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households Total HUD assisted households with at least one disabled person (1000s) ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI 1,916 534 399 603 366 1,739 86 90 1,518 339 53 6 436 80 15 3 316 73 9 1 458 123 20 2 299 59 8 1 1,390 298 47 5 66 17 2 0 62 24 4 1 4,856 6,197 10,841 5,666 22,851 1,834 1,287 1,147 810 858 2,041 1,108 997 1,207 2,887 1,874 1,761 2,024 5,182 996 855 1,042 2,774 4,318 3,596 4,191 10,746 306 297 354 878 217 231 260 579 24.1 23.2 23.9 25.7 22.5 23.2 26.4 33.6 35.8 33.2 27.3 19.0 38.4 32.7 26.6 16.7 36.4 33.9 27.2 18.6 36.5 35.6 29.4 20.6 31.5 28.9 24.6 18.7 34.6 31.7 26.1 18.3 40.2 37.7 30.5 20.7 47.4 45.9 37.8 26.5 Total households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) (1000s) 25,644 4,322 5,798 10,238 5,299 21,112 1,748 1,197 ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 3,605 4,084 5,077 12,877 710 730 843 2,039 792 923 1,197 2,886 1,415 1,639 2,004 5,180 696 796 1,034 2,773 2,928 3,299 4,144 10,741 240 280 351 877 155 208 255 579 22.4 20.7 22.3 24.3 21.0 21.4 25.1 31.2 25.2 30.7 27.0 19.0 23.8 29.5 26.2 16.7 26.0 31.4 27.0 18.6 27.6 33.2 29.1 20.6 22.1 26.9 24.4 18.7 23.5 29.0 25.8 18.3 31.5 35.5 30.3 20.6 33.9 41.2 37.2 26.5 93.0 89.0 93.6 94.4 93.5 92.4 95.3 93.0 70.4 92.3 99.0 100.0 62.0 90.1 98.3 99.9 71.5 92.6 99.2 100.0 75.5 93.0 99.0 100.0 69.9 93.1 99.3 100.0 67.8 91.7 98.9 100.0 78.4 94.2 99.3 100.0 71.6 89.8 98.3 99.9 Tenure: All owner- and renter-occupied households Total households with at least one disabled 27,560 person (1000s) ≤ 30% HAM FI 5,123 By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI 4,423 relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI 5,131 income > 80% HAM FI 12,883 Percent of total households with at least one disabled person ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI By relative income Percent of total households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Percent of disabled households not receiving HUD assistance ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI 21 Table 9: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households (continued) U.S. Tenure: Renter-occupied households only Total renting households with at least one disabled person (1000s) ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Northeast M idwest South Region Region Region West Central Outlying Rural Region counties counties counties 8,717 1,827 1,891 3,067 1,932 7,536 467 318 3,233 1,937 1,592 1,955 816 388 290 332 715 442 354 380 1,046 694 582 745 655 413 366 497 2,824 1,646 1,366 1,701 163 109 90 105 108 81 61 67 22.9 24.2 24.9 22.9 20.1 22.0 27.0 34.4 34.0 28.1 20.3 14.1 38.3 29.2 20.7 12.4 35.3 30.4 21.5 15.5 33.1 28.8 20.9 14.7 30.0 24.2 18.2 13.5 33.1 26.9 19.4 13.5 38.4 32.9 24.2 17.4 46.2 42.5 31.2 22.3 Total renting households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) (1000s) 6,801 1,293 1,492 2,464 1,566 5,797 381 228 ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 1,715 1,599 1,539 1,949 380 308 275 330 399 369 345 380 588 571 562 743 356 354 359 497 1,434 1,349 1,319 1,695 97 92 87 104 47 58 57 67 Percent of total renting households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) 17.8 17.1 19.7 18.4 16.3 16.9 22.0 24.7 ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 18.1 23.2 19.6 14.0 17.9 23.2 19.6 12.3 19.7 25.4 20.9 15.4 18.6 23.7 20.2 14.7 16.3 20.8 17.8 13.4 16.8 22.0 18.7 13.5 22.9 27.7 23.5 17.4 19.9 30.2 29.0 22.1 78.0 70.8 78.9 80.3 81.0 76.9 81.6 71.7 53.1 82.5 96.6 99.7 46.6 79.3 94.8 99.2 55.8 83.4 97.4 99.8 56.2 82.3 96.5 99.7 54.3 85.8 97.9 99.9 50.8 81.9 96.6 99.7 59.5 84.3 97.3 99.7 43.1 71.1 93.0 99.1 Percent of total renting households with at least one disabled person ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI By relative income By relative income Percent of disabled, renting households not receiving HUD assistance ≤ 30% HAM FI By > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI income > 80% HAM FI Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database 22 Table 10 presents the same information, broken down by quartiles of poverty rate, median rent, and median household income of the counties in which HUD-assisted disabled persons reside. Generally, the percent of disabled voucher recipients receiving vouchers designated for the disabled is higher in counties with lower poverty rates and higher median rents. The same is true for the multifamily assisted program, although counties with moderate median rents house the highest percent of disabled persons living in facilities designed for the disabled. The relationship is strongest for the public housing program. For these residents, counties with high poverty rates, low median rents, and low median incomes house the highest percent of those living in units designated for the disabled. Turning to the section of Table 10 inventorying the unassisted population among all households, we find that, among those with the lowest income, counties with lower median rents and income tend to house a larger population of potentially eligible disabled persons that do not receive HUD assistance. Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) 1 County level statistic average Average percent of mainstream/designated voucher households among disabled voucher households Average percent of disabled, multifamily households in properties with disability accommodations Poverty Rate Quartile 2 3 4 M edian Gross Rent Quartile 1 2 3 4 M edian Household Income Quartile 1 2 3 4 9.4 14.1 17.8 24.3 20.1 17.1 15.9 12.5 23.4 17.5 14.5 10.2 5.3 5.5 4.5 4.7 4.4 4.3 5.7 5.6 4.5 5.0 4.3 6.2 53.0 55.7 51.6 46.7 54.1 57.0 51.9 43.6 49.3 53.3 55.8 48.3 Average percent of disabled, public housing households with an accessibility feature in their unit 6.0 7.3 6.9 9.4 8.1 8.0 6.4 7.5 9.8 6.1 7.0 6.8 Average number of HUD assisted households with at least one disabled person 780 934 1,389 911 256 399 972 2,392 471 753 1,156 1,635 ≤ 30% HAM FI 643 734 1,103 716 177 289 758 1,977 352 567 916 1,362 > 30%, ≤ 50% 120 173 244 161 66 95 187 350 98 159 207 234 By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% 15 25 38 30 12 14 24 58 19 24 31 34 income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 2 2 4 4 2 1 2 7 3 2 3 5 Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database 23 Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) (continued) Poverty Rate Quartile 1 2 3 Tenure: All owner- and renter-occupied households Average number of households with at least one 13,394 disabled person ≤ 30% HAM FI 2,241 > 30%, ≤ 50% 1,939 By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% 2,297 income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 6,918 Average percent of total households with at least one disabled person ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 22.3 Average percent of total households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI Average percent of disabled households not receiving HUD assistance ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI M edian Gross Rent Quartile 1 2 3 4 M edian Household Income Quartile 1 2 3 4 14,553 18,137 10,305 5,099 7,045 14,155 30,169 6,664 11,915 15,537 22,301 2,492 2,299 3,477 2,929 2,299 1,789 913 949 1,188 1,224 2,579 2,295 5,844 4,498 1,388 1,204 2,076 2,000 2,842 2,453 4,208 3,302 2,778 3,418 1,937 1,044 1,428 2,729 5,241 1,307 2,318 2,940 3,869 6,984 8,313 4,279 2,192 3,205 6,551 14,586 2,765 5,520 7,301 10,922 27.0 30.0 33.5 34.2 29.4 26.7 22.4 35.5 29.9 25.8 21.6 37.6 33.0 40.1 37.7 42.4 41.2 42.6 44.1 47.6 46.7 42.0 41.0 38.9 37.1 34.1 31.1 46.6 46.8 41.3 41.2 39.0 36.6 35.9 31.3 26.0 30.5 34.0 38.1 39.2 33.6 30.2 25.6 40.4 33.8 29.2 25.2 17.4 21.3 23.8 26.9 26.5 23.3 21.4 18.2 28.2 23.9 20.3 17.0 13,620 16,748 9,394 4,842 6,646 13,183 27,776 6,193 11,162 14,380 20,665 1,597 1,819 1,758 2,126 2,375 2,685 1,584 1,628 737 883 898 1,129 1,821 2,108 3,867 4,147 1,036 1,106 1,509 1,841 1,926 2,246 2,846 3,068 2,282 2,754 3,379 1,908 1,032 1,415 2,705 5,183 1,289 2,294 2,909 3,835 6,916 6,982 8,309 4,275 2,190 3,203 6,549 14,579 2,762 5,518 7,298 10,918 21.3 25.6 28.5 31.7 32.6 28.0 25.3 21.1 33.7 28.4 24.5 20.4 29.5 31.2 30.9 35.1 33.1 38.3 34.2 40.8 38.8 43.5 33.4 38.1 29.9 34.5 25.4 29.1 38.2 43.5 32.2 38.3 29.8 34.1 27.3 29.5 25.8 30.3 33.7 37.6 38.8 33.3 29.9 25.4 39.9 33.4 28.9 25.1 17.4 21.3 23.8 26.9 26.5 23.3 21.4 18.2 28.2 23.9 20.3 17.0 95.4 94.7 94.4 94.2 95.1 95.0 94.5 94.1 94.8 94.8 94.4 94.8 78.5 94.0 76.0 92.9 76.4 92.3 79.5 91.7 80.2 92.8 79.7 92.3 75.5 92.7 74.9 93.1 80.5 92.0 78.2 92.5 75.2 92.7 76.4 93.8 99.5 99.2 99.0 98.6 98.9 99.1 99.2 99.2 98.7 99.0 99.2 99.4 100.0 100.0 99.9 99.9 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0 Average number of households with at least one disabled person (minus 12,614 disabled households receiving HUD assistance) ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI 4 Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database 24 Table 10: Summary of supply and demand for affordable housing among disabled households, by quartile using county level averages (among counties with HUD assistance) (continued) Poverty Rate Quartile 1 2 3 4 Tenure: Renter-occupied households only Average number of renting households with at least one 3,702 4,462 6,236 3,667 disabled person By relative income ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI > 80% HAM FI Average percent of total renting households with at least one disabled person ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI Average number of renting households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI Average percent of total renting households with at least one disabled person (minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance) ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% By HAM FI relative > 50%, ≤ 80% income HAM FI > 80% HAM FI Average percent of disabled, renting households not receiving HUD assistance By relative income ≤ 30% HAM FI > 30%, ≤ 50% HAM FI > 50%, ≤ 80% HAM FI > 80% HAM FI M edian Gross Rent Quartile 1 2 3 4 M edian Household Income 1 2 3 4 1,398 2,042 4,532 10,121 2,080 3,675 5,100 7,220 1,371 1,555 2,304 1,492 496 701 1,644 3,890 814 1,274 1,841 2,795 798 1,007 1,376 808 362 515 1,031 2,086 483 869 1,124 1,516 653 858 1,135 647 269 396 859 1,773 372 695 970 1,256 881 1,042 1,421 720 271 430 998 2,372 411 837 1,166 1,653 24.4 28.3 30.4 31.5 35.3 30.1 27.1 21.9 34.4 29.9 27.4 22.7 37.5 39.9 41.3 39.3 46.3 40.7 37.9 33.0 43.9 40.1 38.4 35.5 30.9 34.7 37.4 38.2 43.0 37.7 32.9 27.5 41.7 37.2 33.8 28.4 21.2 24.8 26.8 30.5 33.0 27.0 23.6 19.6 32.6 26.9 24.2 19.6 15.2 18.5 20.0 21.1 22.0 19.8 18.7 14.2 22.8 19.5 18.2 14.2 2,922 3,528 4,847 2,756 1,141 1,643 3,561 7,728 1,609 2,923 3,944 5,585 727 821 1,201 776 319 412 886 1,913 462 707 925 1,433 678 834 1,133 647 296 421 844 1,736 385 710 917 1,282 638 833 1,096 617 257 382 834 1,715 354 671 939 1,222 879 1,040 1,417 716 269 429 996 2,364 408 835 1,163 1,648 20.3 23.2 25.1 25.8 29.1 25.0 22.4 17.9 28.6 24.6 22.6 18.6 23.1 24.5 26.0 25.3 30.7 25.9 23.2 19.0 29.4 25.0 23.4 21.0 26.7 28.9 30.9 30.8 35.1 31.2 27.5 23.5 33.9 30.6 28.4 24.4 20.8 24.0 25.9 29.1 31.5 26.1 23.0 19.1 31.1 25.9 23.6 19.2 15.1 18.5 19.9 20.9 21.9 19.7 18.6 14.2 22.7 19.5 18.1 14.2 82.8 81.6 81.3 80.3 81.6 81.8 81.6 81.0 81.2 81.5 81.6 81.7 60.0 57.6 58.9 60.4 61.9 58.8 59.9 56.2 60.3 62.0 56.6 57.9 84.1 82.5 81.6 80.1 81.5 81.5 83.2 82.0 80.1 82.1 82.4 83.7 98.1 95.7 95.9 95.6 94.4 95.4 97.7 97.8 95.2 95.6 96.8 97.8 99.8 99.5 99.6 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.8 99.7 99.6 99.8 99.5 99.8 Sources: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset, 3-year sample, 2008-2010; CHAS, 5-year sample, 2006-2010; HUD longitudinal data from TRACS and PIC, 2013, household and member files; iREM s database 25 Conclusions and Policy Implications This report presents the first comprehensive nationwide analysis of the relationship between disabled households, disabled HUD-assisted households, and the HUD-assisted units in which households reside. We conclude with a discussion of several policy implications of these findings, focusing on specific policy questions addressed by our analyses. Which HUD programs serve the largest number of disabled households by the age and sex of disabled household members? The number of disabled persons per HUD-assisted housing unit is largest among the workingage population (age 18-64), regardless of the sex of disabled persons. We find that HUD programs serve a larger number of female disabled adults than males, likely due in part to the prevalence of female-headed households in the population of HUD-assisted households. Below age 18, however, greater numbers of disabled males than disabled females are found per unit. Comparing these outcomes across program types, we find that the number of disabled persons per HUD-assisted housing unit is greatest in the mainstream voucher program, which is somewhat expected given that this program is specifically targeted to households with disabled persons. With the exception of the Section 811 program, most HUD programs serve a lower income population. Considering programs not specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled, the prevalence of disabled persons is highest in the tenant-based voucher program. Among disabled persons receiving tenant-based voucher assistance, less than five percent of disabled households receive assistance from a tenant-based program specifically targeted to the needs of the disabled. By comparison, 48 percent of disabled persons participating in the multifamily program live in properties with units designated for the disabled. This is a source of policy concern, because such non-designated vouchers do not come with supportive services or other accommodations to meet the needs of the disabled population. Furthermore, upon turnover, these vouchers may not be made available for other disabled households. Which types of geographic areas are most successful in serving the needs of disabled HUDassisted households? HUD-assisted disabled households are more prevalent in the West and in central counties, but these results vary with the age of disabled persons. Greater numbers of disabled individuals of all age groups are found per 1,000 assisted units in the South. We also find that these ratios are greater for working-aged female disabled persons in outlying suburban counties, for disabled children and elderly persons in the South, and for working-aged disabled persons in the West. We find that the percent of disabled HUD-assisted households living in units designated for the disabled varies little by geography with a few exceptions. In the public housing program, Western counties accommodate the highest share of disabled households in designated units, and in the multifamily program, rural Midwestern counties accommodate the highest percentage. If we consider those in the public housing program that have requested disability amenities, only 30 percent of those requesting such amenities actually received them. This percentage is highest in the West, where 77 percent of those requesting disability features received them, and lowest in 26 the South, where only 11 percent of those requesting disability features received them. Central counties are also more successful in matching disabled households with their requested accommodations. We also find that in the public housing program particularly, counties with high poverty rates, low median rents, and low median incomes house the highest percent of disabled households living in units designated for the disabled. We find that a substantial percentage of potentially-eligible disabled U.S. households do not receive HUD assistance. Even among those with extremely low incomes (<30% of AMI), more than 70 percent of total households and more than 50 percent of renting households do not receive HUD assistance. This percentage is highest in outlying counties within the South and in counties with lower rents and, for total households, median incomes. These findings point to a need for more community outreach to identify potentially-eligible and interested disabled households for HUD’s disability assistance programs. Devine (2000) conducted an informal survey of 25 PHAs to identify how disabled households were recruited for participation in HUD’s mainstream voucher program and found that more than half added disabled persons to waiting lists following community outreach to local advocacy groups and other public and private agencies. Our results point to the need for more targeting of such efforts, particularly within suburban counties in the South. Which types of PHAs are most successful in serving the needs of disabled HUD-assisted households? We find that larger PHAs generally serve a larger number of disabled persons. Large PHAs are also generally more successful in accommodating disabled households within accessible units than smaller PHAs. There is one exception to these overall trends: medium-sized PHAs serve a larger population of working-aged disabled males. Future research should determine why large PHAs are more successful in accommodating disabled households within accessible units, particularly disabled households earning lower incomes. Larger PHAs may operate more efficiently due to economies of scale, may be better staffed, and may have more resources to address the needs of special needs populations. Alternatively, other confounding factors may be driving the results for large PHAs, such as disabled people being more predominantly located in areas with larger PHAs. PHAs in larger cities may also have admissions preferences that favor disabled persons of a particular sex or age group. Finally, as suggested by Devine’s (2000) analysis of a sample of PHAs administering the mainstream voucher program, larger PHAs may be more capable of actively seeking out special needs households through various community outreach efforts. How should HUD data resources be revised to address future questions pertaining to disability? We conclude with a discussion of proposed changes to HUD’s administrative datasets that would facilitate future analyses of HUD-assisted disabled households. First, information on disabled households is often provided in more than one database, raising the potential for conflicting information about the program or location where the household resides, even after controlling for the “effective date” of a household action. Future assessments, using pooled datasets scanned for consistency, would better allow researchers to unambiguously identify a household’s program and geography at a given point in time. 27 Second, the definition of disability and disability program status are not clearly and consistently identified in HUD’s data resources. Both PIC and TRACS include a single variable identifying disability for HUD program participants, but the information does not contain type of disability, making it impossible to determine if HUD households are living in units appropriate for their disability. Only public housing residents are asked to identify whether an accessible unit was requested and received. This information should be provided for all HUD program participants, and an additional question should be added such as, “Does the requested accessible unit provide all necessary accommodations appropriate to the disabled household member(s) needs?” Furthermore, the information for disability program status was made available in several separate variables (see Appendix A). We recommend that a single variable be created to make it easier to identify any and all disability programs for which HUD-assisted households qualify. If additional supportive services are provided, these should be identified as well. Third, we note several instances of missing data and potential measurement error in key variables used to analyze disability. For example, roughly 15 percent of public housing observations did not have information on whether accessibility features were provided. In some instances, high values for age were observed (with more than 1,700 observations being over 100, and more than 2 dozen over 120), several of which were seemingly unrealistic. This generally coincided with erroneous information on birth dates. Finally, in this analysis we had to combine both the 5-year (2006-2010) and 3-year (2008-2010) CHAS files to determine the total number of disabled households within each income group, because both the total number of households and total number of disabled households within each income group was not available in each sample. Future CHAS products should make such comparisons feasible for each CHAS sample provided. 28 References Devine, Deborah. 2000. Persons with Disabilities Assisted under the Section 8 Mainstream SetAside Program. Cityscape 5, 1: 231-235. Hoffman, Denise W. and Gina A. Livermore. 2012. The house next door: A comparison of residences by disability status using new measures in the American Housing Survey. Cityscape 14, 1: 5-34. Perl, Libby. 2013. Section 811 and Other HUD Housing Programs for Persons with Disabilities. Congressional Research Service report 7-5700. Washington, D.C. Schwartz, Alex F. 2015. Housing Policy in the United States, 3rd Ed. Routledge: London. She, Peiyun, and Gina A. Livermore. 2009. Long-Term Poverty and Disability among WorkingAge Adults. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 19, 4: 244–256. Souza, Maria Teresa, Robert A. Collinson, Marge Martin, Barry L. Steffen, David A. Vandenbroucke, and Yung-Gann David Yao. 2011. 2009 Worst Case Housing Needs of People with Disabilities. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research: Washington, D.C. 29 Appendices. Explanation of data products and variable codebook The first part of this document, Appendix A, provides a detailed explanation of the process associated with generating the data products and the variables contained therein. A codebook listing the variable and their definitions for each file can be found in the second part of this document in Appendix B. While the information in these two sections overlap to a large extent, the first section offers additional details beyond particular calculations, and more specifically outlines the assumptions made by the researchers, as well as any additional comments and caveats. Appendix A. Explanation of data products Data products derived from public summary files The following data products, A)-D), were calculated at the national, state, county, and place level (using FIPS codes for the latter three),7 using publicly available data from the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Note that all output covers only the 50 states and the District of Columbia (thereby ignoring other regions with FIPS codes, such as Puerto Rico). Product D) additionally reports variables at the level of PHA and multifamily Project. A) Number of disabled persons by sex and age (< 5, 5-17, 18-34, 35-64, 65-74, 75+), and ratio of number of disabled persons by sex and age to the number of occupied housing units. Source: 2009-2013 5-year ACS estimates (Tables B18101 for disability status and B25002 for occupied housing units) Files: “sex by age by disability, ACS 2009-2013 (total count).xlsx” and “sex by age by disability, ACS 2009-2013 (per occupied housing unit).xlsx” Geographies are distinguished by worksheet, within each file. Variable names are primarily self-explanatory, and make use of the following acronyms: o Dis: disabled o POHU: per occupied housing unit B) Ratio of number of disabled persons by age (<18, 18-64, and 65+) and poverty status to number of occupied housing units. Source: 2009-2013 5-year ACS estimates (Table C18130 for disability / poverty status and B25002 for occupied housing units). A “Census designated place” (CDP), or “place” for short, is defined by the Census as a concentration of population identified for statistical classifications purposes. They are delineated for each decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places, such as counties, towns, and villages. CDPs are not jurisdictions per se; however, their geography tends to be similar to the places incorporated within. 7 30 File: “age by disability by poverty, ACS 2009-2013 (per occupied housing unit).xls” Geographies are distinguished by worksheet. Variable names are primarily selfexplanatory, and make use of the following acronyms: o Dis: disabled o Pov/NoPov: count for households that are in poverty/not in poverty o POHU: per occupied housing unit Products A) and B) were obtained directly from queries made on Dataferret. Unfortunately, the age category breakdowns available for B) are less detailed in the 5year estimates for ACS (in the case of disability/poverty status, only the “C” Table is available for download, rather than the alternative, more detailed “B” Table). C) Number of households containing at least one disabled person by type of disability, tenure status, and household income (as a percent of HAMFI). Source: 2008-2010 CHAS (obtained using the CHAS Data Query tool on huduser.org). File: “CHAS data, 2008-2010.xls” For this data product, the variable names already provided by CHAS were used. They are identified in the subsequent worksheet, labeled “variable key.” D) Total unit count, total occupied, percent occupied, number reported, and percent (among those occupied) reported. Source: A Picture of Subsidized Housing (POSH), 2013 File: “POSH unit totals by program.xlsx” Nine program categories are used in this file, and are determined using the “program” and “sub-program” variables from POSH (which is available only in the Project level file, which is then aggregated for other levels of geography), as follows: 1) Public housing: program equals 2 2) Section 8 certificates and vouchers: program equals 3 3) Section 8 mod rehab: program equals 4 4) Multifamily, Section 202: sub-program equals 2 or 3 5) Multifamily, Section 236: sub-program equals 4 6) Multifamily, Section 811: program equals 4, (i.e., sub-program equals 5 or 6) 7) Multifamily, programs breaking out Section 8: sub-program equals 1 8) Multifamily, all other: sub-program equals 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11 9) All programs combined: no qualifiers Note that POSH provides information on the number of total units and the percent reported, from which it is possible to estimate, as done here, the number of occupied units. However, in the event of a low occupied unit count, the percent occupied is not 31 reported. By extension, this inhibits the percent reported, among those occupied, from also being reported (since the denominator is missing, in such cases). For this reason, in addition to the four variables, two flag variables, Flag_OccupiedMissingObs and Flag_NumReportedMissingObs, are reported. The former indicates whether the project level observation – for the Project level sheet – or at least one project level observation used to aggregate the value listed in the row for higher levels of aggregation was missing information on the percent of occupied units; the latter reports this for in a similar manner for the number reported variable, when information for it was missing for either a row directly in the Project worksheet or at least one of the projects used to calculate estimates for higher levels of aggregation. Thus, when a flag for either is reported, it is important that the estimate of total occupied and percent occupied (for the former flag), and number reported (for the second flag) be interpreted as a lower bound. When the second flag only is reported, the percent reported may be interpreted as an upper bound. However, when both flags are reported for a row, it is difficult to interpret the percent reported, since both the numerator and denominator comprising the estimate are underestimated. Note also that, for the PHA worksheet, unit counts for the multifamily programs are not provided. This is because PHAs do not oversee multifamily programs. Data products derived from HUD administrative data Before discussing the subsequent data products, the following several measures that were taken, in preparing the data for aggregation, should be noted.  Any rows in the data indicating the households removal from a program, i.e., with an entry for actn_type_cd of "6","MO", or "TM", was dropped from our analysis  Beginning with the longitudinal file (“index_hshld_longitudinal_2013”), it was recognized that many observations had duplicate entries in the data. These were primarily managed by using information about the most recent effective date (efctv_dt). In the event of duplicates entries with identical entries for efctv_dt, however, the following process was employed. o Households were then compared the the date provided from the variable admsn_dt. The entry with the more recent admission date was used, when a discrepancy existed. o In the event of identical dates for admsn_dt as well, it was observed that virtually all households with duplicates entries were listed in more than one system (the Public and Indian Housing Information Center, or PIC [form 50058, and/or form 50058 MTW], or TRACS), and that one of the entries had listed as being part of a tenantbased or project-based housing choice voucher program (based on how participation in such is defined in Table 1A of this document). These HCV entries for each household were given priority. o Less than a dozen households remain with duplicate entries, following this procedure. Most of these share identical geographic and income information, and are thus of no concern. Four households remained, which contained conflicting geographic information. In the absence of further information, one of the two locations was 32 arbitrarily chosen, since no other information was available to indicate which should take priority.  Households are then classified into one of eleven HUD program categories (public housing; Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV) – tenant based/all other; HCV – “designated”; HCV – mainstream; HCV – homeownership; HCV – project-based; Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation; multifamily assisted programs breaking out Section 8, Section 202/811, and Section 236). For details on this procedure, see Table 1A. In addition, they are separately included in a category for all HUD programs combined. Programs for HCV and multifamily are also combined together, in separate categories.  Households are furthermore classified into one of four income categories: o Extremely low income (L30): where total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or ext_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y” o Very low income (L50): where ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ very_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or (very_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y” and ext_low_inc_lmt_indr does not equal “Y”) (note that this category excludes L30 households) o Low income (L80): where very_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ low_inc_lmt_amnt (note that this category excludes L50 and L30 households) o Non-low income (all other): where total_annl_incm_amnt > low_inc_lmt_amnt  In the event that no information is provided on either income or income category thresholds that apply to a household, they are excluded from this part of the analysis (note that these were not a major concern, as they comprise less than one percent of the total sample)  The following methods were used to identify particular attributes of each household: o Whether disability features were requested: acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or acsblty_rcvd_indr equaled “1” through “6” (i.e., neither contains an empty value, nor equals “0”) o Whether disability features were obtained: acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2” o Whether a household’s unit was designated as accessible: acsbl_unit_indr equals “Y” o Whether the accessibility designation is known: acsbl_unit_indr equals “Y” or “N” (i.e., not empty) 33  Disability status: households were identified as disabled by one of the following three methods: o Using the member file (index_member_longitudinal_2013), if a member of the household had a disability indicator (mbr_dsblty_indr) of “Y” or “y” o In the event no disabled were reported in the aforementioned file, households were alternatively labeled as disabled* by one of the following methods:  Using the disabled indicator from the “mf_member_special_status_code” file, households were denoted as disabled if “H” was reported under SPECIAL_STATUS_CD  Matching households to the file “mf_property_id_imparement”, a household was labeled as disabled if they had an indicator of “Y” for any of the following three variables: MOBILITY_IMPARED_IND, HEARING_IMPRD_IND, VISUALLY_IMPRD_IND o Lastly, when merged with the “ssi_households” file, if the family is recorded as 1) receiving a nonzero amount of SSI, and 2) not having anyone in the household age 65+ (since disability is not a prerequisite for members of this group to receive SSI) *For these households, we cannot calculate just how many members within a household are disabled, let alone their age and gender. As a conservative measure, we assume that only one disabled member resides in each of these households. Any aggregated tabulations, therefore, concerned with the total disabled count per region ought to be regarded as a lower bound estimate. Tabulations concerning the sex and age of disabled household members will not include these households, since there is no information to identify the age and sex of the disabled household member(s).  When collapsing the data to various geographic levels, the following information from the longitudinal file (i.e., index_hshld_longitudinal_2013) is used to classify a household’s geography: o State: unit_fips_state_cd o County: unit_fips_state_cd and unit_fips_cnty_cd o Place: unit_fips_state_cd and unit_place_cd o PHA: pha_cd o Project: for observations from TRACS, proj_num; for observations from PIC, dvlpt_num The variables used to identify geography in the data products are hhNation, hhState, hhCounty, hhPlace, hhPHA, hhProj. It should also be noted that many variables generated using the HUD longitudinal data are bottom-coded, in the event that few households are counted for a particular statistic within a specified geography and program. In general, entries are bottom-coded with a value of -1 in the 34 event that the number (or, in the event of it being a fraction or percent, the value of either the numerator or denominator) is less than 10. Details concerning which variables are subject to bottom-coding, and how bottom-coding was determined in such cases, are provided in the codebook (Appendix B). The following products were calculated at the following levels, using HUD administrative data: national, state, county, place, PHA, and housing project: E) Number of disabled household members per HUD-assisted unit by sex and age (< 5, 517, 18-34, 35-64, 65-74, 75+, and all age categories). Files: “disabled household count by sex by age.xlsx” The age categories are constructed so as to be consistent with those reported in the ACS. The age and gender of each household member is determined directly from the “index_member_longitudinal” file (which is merged with the previously discussed household data), using the “mbr_age_yr_cnt” and “male” variables. Note that some observations were reported with erroneous, or seemingly erroneous, information; over 1700 observations have a reported age of 100+, and 26 observations of 120+. Albeit an arbitrary threshold, for the sake of establishing a boundary, we cap the age 75+ category at the age of 110. o First, binary variables are created which classify whether a household member falls into a particular sex-age-disabled category (e.g., male, age 18-34, disabled). o Second, this information is aggregated to the household level, by taking the summation for each indicator by household id, giving us a household level total of disabled persons for each sex-age-disability cohort. o The dataset is then collapsed to the household level. o For each geographic level, households are then aggregated by taking the summation of household totals for each group. This value, for each cohort, is then divided by the summation of total HUD-assisted units, which is calculated as the summation of all households within our longitudinal file that are identified with that particular level of geography. The acronym PAU for each variable is used to refer to “per assisted unit”. F) Number of households containing at least one disabled person by household income (as a percent of HAMFI). Files: “disabled household count by household income.xlsx” The aggregation process is conducted in a manner very analogous to E), with a few notable exceptions. First the number of disabled persons was not counted; instead, a binary indicator was simply used to denote if a household had at least one disabled member. These binary values were then aggregated to produce a total household count for each geographic level. Second, instead of calculating the summations for each geographic level by sex-age-disabled cohort, the disabled households are each separated into four income categories (L30, L50, L80, and non-low income). The values in this file are reported in terms of both total count and, as with E), per-assisted unit. 35 Note: All statistics to be henceforth discussed have their variable names noted in parentheses at the end of each heading. Public Housing Statistics File: “disability characteristics of public housing residents.xlsx” For public housing statistics, G)-K), the sample is filtered to include only households for which the variable “pgm_type_cd” equals “P”. G) Number of disabled persons per public housing household (totDisabledPerPHHH) The summation of disabled individuals contained in all public housing households, divided by the total number of public housing households counted for that particular geography. H) Number of public housing households with at least one disabled person (totalDisabledHHs) The sum of public housing households with at least one disabled person. I) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person (pctTotalDisabledHHs) The value from H), times 100, divided by the total number of HUD-assisted units counted at each level of geography. J) Number of public housing households requesting disability features by disability status (reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis) Calculated by tallying the total number of households for which either 1) acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or 2) acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” through “6” (i.e., does not equal 0, nor is blank). This is calculated separately for households with and without 1 or more disabled persons in the household. K) Percent of public housing households requesting disability features which have at least one disabled person (pctReqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis) The value from J) for reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the sum of reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis and reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis. L) Number of public housing households receiving disability features by disability status (recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis) Similar procedure to J): this time, tallying only disabled and nondisabled households for which acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2” (i.e., the household fully [“1”] or partially [“2”] received accessibility features that were requested) M) Percent of public housing households receiving disability features which have at least one disabled person (pctRecvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis) The value from L) for recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the sum of recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis and recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis. 36 N) Number of public housing households requesting accessibility features, which ultimately received them, by disability status (reqstdAndRecvd_Dis, reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis) For disabled and non-disabled groups separately, the number of households which both requested and received accessibility features. O) Percent of public housing households requesting accessibility features, which ultimately received them, by disability status (pctReqstdAndRecvd_Dis, pctRreqstdAndRecvd_NoDis) The first is equal to reqstdAndRecvd_Dis, times 100, divided by reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis. The second is equal to reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis, times 100, divided by reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis. P) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person receiving housing units with disability features (pctDisHHsWithAccssbltyFtrs) The value from recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, times 100, divided by the total number of disabled public housing households (totalDisabledHHs) counted for that geography. Multifamily Assisted Program Statistics File: “disability characteristics of multifamily residents.xlsx” As the next calculations, L)-O), all pertain to multifamily assisted tenants, the sample is filtered to households designated, following the procedure outlined in Table 1A, for the following categories: Section 202, Section 811, Section 236, multifamily programs breaking out Section 8, and “all other”. Q) Number of disabled persons per multifamily unit (totDisabledPerUnit) Similar procedure to that of G), this time using the universe of multifamily – rather than public housing - households. The unit count is determined directly for all geographic levels except for the PHA and Project level using Data directly from the POSH database. The total unit count is aggregated for each geography for program categories “Section 8 New Construction or Substantial Rehabilitation (including 202/8 projects)”, “Section 236 Projects (FHAFederal Housing Administration)”, and “All other multifamily assisted projects with FHA insurance or HUD subsidy (including Section 8 Loan Management, Rental Assistance Program (RAP), Rent Supplement (SUP), Property Disposition, Section 202/811 capital advance, and Preservation”. The total unit counts for PHA and project level results are alternatively calculated using the information within the longitudinal data, using a method similar to that outlined for counting the number of project level public housing units. Instead of using dvlpt_num and dvlpmnt_acc_unit_cnt. However, the variables cntrt_num and cntrt_asstd_unit_cnt are used, which are specific to each multifamily contract. In the case of PHA level estimates, however, not every household within a particular multifamily unit always belonged to the same PHA. A threshold was employed, therefore, whereby a PHA’s unit count only included a multifamily unit if more 37 than 10 percent of the households listed under for a given entry for cntrt_num were listed with the PHA. R) Number of households living in multifamily properties with at least one disabled person (totalDisabledHHs) The sum of multifamily households with at least one disabled person. S) Percent of households living in multifamily properties with at least one disabled person (pctTotalDisabledHHs) The value from totalDisabledHHs, times 100, divided by the total number of multifamily households counted for the geography. T) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designed for the disabled disaggregated by type of disability feature (facility for elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV) (totalDisHHs_<condition>, where <condition> refers to EldrlyDisbld, DisbldExclsv, ChrncMentlIll, PhysDisbld, DvlpmtDisbld, HIV) Similar procedure to that of R), with calculations further disaggregated by the type of disability feature. Such disaggregation is made possible from merging the household data with the iREMS files - “iREMS 20141016 dbo_owner_survey” (1) and “iREMS 20141016 dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail” (2) – containing the following indicators: o eldrly_disabled_indicator (1) o exclusive_disabled_indicator (1) o chronically_mentally_ill_ind (2) o mobility_impairment_ind / other_impairment_ind (2) (facilities are identified as being for physically disabled if either one of these indicators equals “Y”) o developmentally_disabled_ind (2) o hiv_ind (2) U) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily housing units with disability features by type of disability feature (pctDisHHs_<condition>, where <condition> refers to those listed in T)) The value from T) is multiplied by 100, then divided by the total number of households residing in units containing each type of disability feature. (For example, if in a locality there are 100 households with at least one disabled person living in a unit of a facility identified as being for the physically disabled, and there are 200 total households identified within that locality as residing within a unit of a facility for the physically disabled, the value reported here would be 50 percent.) Note that in some geographies, there are zero units with a particular disability feature, in which case this procedure produces an empty value, since zero cannot be a denominator value. 38 Assisted Unit Count File: “accessible unit count by number of bedrooms.xlsx” V) The number of accessible public housing and multifamily units by bedroom count (accessibleUnits_<bedroom group>, where <bedroom group> is categorized into 0 to 1 bedrooms (0to1Br), 2 bedrooms (2Br), 3 bedrooms (3Br), and 4 or more bedrooms (4plusBr)) These estimates are obtained by counting the number of households inhabiting 1) a public housing unit which, by our previously noted criteria, is denoted as accessible, or 2) a multifamily property with disability features previously listed under T). Note that, because no information was available to the researchers for counting the number of units within each multifamily property specifically (i.e., the iREMs categorizes, for multifamily properties as a whole, whether disability features are available), these counts are to be interpreted as upper bound estimates. The bedroom count for each unit is determined from the variable num_bedrm_cnt, listed for each observation in the HUD longitudinal data. Supply and Demand Statistics File: “unaided inventory.xlsx” This file, provided for four geographic levels (U.S., state, county, and place) is discussed in two parts. The first, with products W) through Y), concerns statistics compiled with the combined use of HUD longitudinal data and CHAS data. The second, with Z) though BB), covers the final three summary statistics derived directly from the HUD longitudinal data. The CHAS data provided by HUD for 2008-2010 (Table 6), when disaggregated by income group, provides only calculations that are disaggregated by disability group, including a group for nondisabled households. Because a household may be counted under more than one disabled category, it is therefore currently not possible to directly calculate the total number of disabled households by adding together the totals from each group. For this reason, we additionally employ the CHAS dataset for 2006-2010, where an estimate of the total households for each income category are provided (Table 1A6). Subsequent references to the count of total disabled households, for each low income group, are to be thus interpreted as the difference between of total number of households according to the 2006-2010 CHAS data, and the total number of households identified as non-disabled, according to the 2008-2010 CHAS data. W) Total disabled households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels (disHHs <income group>, where <income group> refers to households within the income groups L30, L50, L80, over L80 [and, as noted earlier in this document, with these income groups being mutually exclusive, such that L50, for example, does not include L30 households], and all income groups) This is calculated directly from CHAS, by taking the estimated total number of disabled households within each of the four income groups. 39 X) Percent of households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels which have at least one disabled person (pctDisHHs <income group>) For each income group, the value from W), times 100, divided by the total number of households within that income group. Y) Total households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels with at least one disabled person minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance (unaidedDisHHs<income group>) This simply subtracts, from W), the number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person within each low income category. These were calculated directly in the previously discussed “disabled household count by household income” file. Z) Percent of households at various HUD-assistance-eligible HAMFI levels with at least one disabled person minus disabled households receiving HUD assistance (pctUnaidedDisHHs<income group>) Similar procedure to X), but using Y) for the numerator instead of W). AA) Percent of households with at least one disabled person not receiving HUD assistance (pctUnaidedDisHHs<income group>) The value of Y) divided by W). The final three summary statistics are calculated directly from the HUD longitudinal database. BB) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted household in a housing voucher program, whose voucher is either part of the Designated or Mainstream voucher program (pctDisVoucherHHsInDesigOrMs) This calculates the percentage of households with one or more disabled persons listed under one of the five voucher programs listed in Table 1A which fall into either the designated or mainstream voucher category. CC) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, households in a multifamily property living within a multifamily property with designated accessible units (pctDisMFHHsInAccblUnt) This calculates the percentage of households with one or disabled person, among those within a multifamily program, which live within a multifamily property that is designed for any one of the disability groups listed previously under H) and I). DD) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, public housing households living within a designated accessible unit (pctDisPHHHsInAccblUnt) This calculates the percentage of public housing households with at least one disabled person that are living in an accessible unit (indicated by having an entry of “Y” under acsbl_unit_indr) 40 Table A1. Methodology for sorting each household into applicable HUD program Program Identified in household data using public housing pgm_type_cd equals "P" housing choice vouchers (HCV): tenant-based and all other 1) either A) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", or "T"; or B) pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd either equals "TBV" or is blank; and 2) neither ned_spcl_pgm_indr nor ms5_spcl_pgm_indr equals 1 HCV: "designated" 1) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", "T", or "V"; or B) pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and 2) ned_spcl_pgm_indr equals 1, and 3) ms5_spcl_pgm_indicator does not equal 1 HCV: mainstream 1) pgm_type_cd equals "CE","PR","H", "T", or "V"; or B) pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and 2) ms5_spcl_pgm_indr equals 1 HCV: homeownership pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd equals "HV" HCV: project-based pgm_type_cd equals "VO" and vchr_type_cd equals "PBV" Section 8 moderate rehabilitation pgm_type_cd equals "MR" Section 202 either 1) pgm_type_cd equals "H7" or "H9"; or 2) the 4th and 5th digits of proj_num equal "EH","HH", or "SH" Section 811 pgm_type_cd equals "H6" or "H8" Section 236 either 1) pgm_type_cd equals "H4" or 2) pgm_type_cd equals "H1" and the 4th and 5th digits of proj_num equal "44" or "45" multifamily assisted programs breaking out Section 8 all observations with pgm_type_cd of H1,H2,H3, and H5 which are not otherwise part of Section 202/811 or 236, above All programs combined no qualifiers All HCV programs combined All 5 HCV programs listed above All Multifamily programs combined All multifamily programs listed above (Section 202, 236, and 811; all multifamily programs breaking out Section 8) 41 Appendix B. Variable Codebook SEX BY AGE BY DISABILITY , ACS 2009-2013 (TOTAL COUNT).XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place) Variable Description GEOID Geography ID SUMLEVEL Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet) ST State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet) COUNTY County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet) PLACE Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet) malesUnder5Dis Total disabled males under the age of 5 males5to17Dis Total disabled males age 5-17 males18to34Dis Total disabled males age 18-34 males35to65Dis Total disabled males age 35-65 males65to74Dis Total disabled males age 65-74 males75PlusDis Total disabled males age 75 or higher femalesUnder5Dis Total disabled females under the age of 5 females5to17Dis Total disabled females age 5-17 females18to34Dis Total disabled females age 18-34 females35to65Dis Total disabled females age 35-65 females65to74Dis Total disabled females age 65-74 females75PlusDis Total disabled females age 75 or higher SEX BY AGE BY DISABILITY, ACS 2009-2013 (PER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT ).XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place) Variable Description GEOID Geography ID SUMLEVEL Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet) ST State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet) COUNTY County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet) PLACE Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet) malesUnder5DisPOHU Total disabled males under the age of 5, per occupied housing unit males5to17DisPOHU Total disabled males age 5-17, per occupied housing unit males18to34DisPOHU Total disabled males age 18-34, per occupied housing unit males35to65DisPOHU Total disabled males age 35-65, per occupied housing unit males65to74DisPOHU Total disabled males age 65-74, per occupied housing unit males75PlusDisPOHU Total disabled males age 75 or higher, per occupied housing unit femalesUnder5DisPOHU Total disabled females under the age of 5, per occupied housing unit Total disabled females age 5-17, per occupied housing unit females5to17DisPOHU 42 females18to34DisPOHU Total disabled females age 18-34, per occupied housing unit females35to65DisPOHU Total disabled females age 35-65, per occupied housing unit females65to74DisPOHU Total disabled females age 65-74, per occupied housing unit females75PlusDisPOHU Total disabled females age 75 or higher, per occupied housing unit AGE BY DISABILITY BY POVERTY , ACS 2009-2013 (PER OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT).XLS NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place) Variable Description GEOID Geography ID SUMLEVEL Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet) ST State FIPS code (not reported in "nation" worksheet) COUNTY County FIPS code (reported only for "county" worksheet) PLACE Place FIPS code (reported only for "place" worksheet) under18DisPOHU Total disabled population below age 18, per occupied housing unit under18DisPovPOHU Total disabled population below age 18 in poverty, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population below age 18 not in poverty, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population age 18-64, per occupied housing unit under18DisNoPovPOHU age18to64DisPOHU age18to64DisPovPOHU age18to64DisNoPovPOHU age65PlusDisPOHU age65PlusDisPovPOHU age65PlusDisNoPovPOHU Total disabled population age 18-64 in poverty, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population age 18-64 not in poverty, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population age 65 and above, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population age 65 and above in poverty, per occupied housing unit Total disabled population age 65 and above not in poverty, per occupied housing unit POSH UNIT TOTALS BY PROGRAM.XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in one sheet, combining six different levels of geographic aggregation (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and project) Nation indicator for U.S. State State FIPS code County County FIPS code Place Place FIPS code PHA PHA ID Project Project ID HUDProgramCategory totalUnits HUD Program Category (See Data Explanations Section for how these are determined) total number of units totalOccupied total number of occupied units pctOccupied totalOccupied divided by totalUnits 43 totalReported pctReported Flag_OccupiedMissingObs Flag_NumReportedMissingObs Number of households for which reports(Form-50058, From-50059) were received Percent, among those occupied, for which reports were received Indicator either 1) for non-project level estimates, at least one project used to calculate the aggregated estimate was missing information for the percent (and, by extension, the number occupied), or 2) for project level estimates, that information was missing for the percent, and number, occupied Indicator either 1) for non-project level estimates, at least one project used to calculate the aggregated estimate was missing information for the number (and thus the percent) reported, or 2) for project level estimates, that information was missing for the number (and percent) reported CHAS DATA, 2008-2010.XLS NOTE: this file is provided in one sheet, combining four different levels of geographic aggregation (nation, state, county, and place) Variable Description sumlevel Summary level (not reported in "nation" worksheet) geoid Geography ID name Name st State FIPS code cnty County FIPS code place Place FIPS code T6_est1 Total: Occupied housing units T6_est87 Renter occupied T6_est2 Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment T6_est19 Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation T6_est36 Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation T6_est53 Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations T6_est70 T6_est88 T6_est105 Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation T6_est122 Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation T6_est139 Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above limitations Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI T6_est156 T6_est3 T6_est7 44 T6_est11 T6_est15 T6_est20 T6_est24 T6_est28 T6_est32 T6_est37 T6_est41 T6_est45 T6_est49 T6_est54 T6_est58 T6_est62 T6_est66 T6_est71 T6_est75 T6_est79 T6_est83 T6_est89 Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Tenure: All; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI 45 T6_est93 T6_est97 T6_est101 T6_est106 T6_est110 T6_est114 T6_est118 T6_est123 T6_est127 T6_est131 T6_est135 T6_est140 T6_est144 T6_est148 T6_est152 T6_est157 T6_est161 T6_est165 T6_est169 Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a hearing or vision impairment AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has an ambulatory limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a cognitive limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has a self-care or independent living limitation AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI Renter occupied; Household member has none of the above limitations AND Household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI 46 DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY SEX BY AGE (TOTAL COUNT ).XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A Variable Description hhNation Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined) hhState hhCounty hhPlace hhPHA hhProj HUDProgCategory maleAgeBel5_DisTotalCount maleAge5to17_DisTotalCount Total disabled males below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled males age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) maleAge18to34_DisTotalCount Total disabled males age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) maleAge35to64_DisTotalCount Total disabled males age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) maleAge65to74_DisTotalCount Total disabled males age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) maleAge75Plus_DisTotalCount Total disabled males age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled males of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled males of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) maleAgeOther_DisTotalCount maleAllAges_DisTotalCount femaleAgeBel5_DisTotalCount femaleAge5to17_DisTotalCount femaleAge18to34_DisTotalCount femaleAge35to64_DisTotalCount femaleAge65to74_DisTotalCount femaleAge75Plus_DisTotalCount Total disabled females age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) 47 femaleAgeOther_DisTotalCount femaleAllAges_DisTotalCount totalAgeBel5_DisTotalCount totalAge5to17_DisTotalCount totalAge18to34_DisTotalCount totalAge35to64_DisTotalCount totalAge65to74_DisTotalCount totalAge75Plus_DisTotalCount totalAgeOther_DisTotalCount totalAllAges_DisTotalCount maleAgeBel5_DisHHs maleAge5to17_DisHHs maleAge18to34_DisHHs maleAge35to64_DisHHs maleAge65to74_DisHHs maleAge75Plus_DisHHs maleAgeOther_DisHHs maleAllAges_DisHHs femaleAgeBel5_DisHHs femaleAge5to17_DisHHs femaleAge18to34_DisHHs femaleAge35to64_DisHHs femaleAge65to74_DisHHs Total disabled females of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled females of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total disabled persons of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 5-17 (equals 1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) 48 femaleAge75Plus_DisHHs femaleAgeOther_DisHHs femaleAllAges_DisHHs totalAgeBel5_DisHHs totalAge5to17_DisHHs totalAge18to34_DisHHs totalAge35to64_DisHHs totalAge65to74_DisHHs totalAge75Plus_DisHHs totalAgeOther_DisHHs totalAllAges_DisHHs Total households with at least one disabled female age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person below age 5 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 5-17 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 18-34 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 35-64 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 65-74 (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 75 or higher (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person of any other age (not reported or over age 110) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person of any age (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total is less than 10) DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY SEX BY AGE ( PER ASSISTED UNIT ). XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A Variable Description hhNation hhState hhCounty hhPlace hhPHA hhProj HUDProgCategory maleAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined) Total disabled males below age 5 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) 49 maleAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU maleAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU maleAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU maleAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU maleAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU maleAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU maleAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU femaleAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU totalAgeBel5_DisTotalCountPAU totalAge5to17_DisTotalCountPAU Total disabled males age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled males of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females below age 5 per assisted household (equals 1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled females of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons below age 5 per assisted household (equals 1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less 50 than 10) totalAge18to34_DisTotalCountPAU totalAge35to64_DisTotalCountPAU totalAge65to74_DisTotalCountPAU totalAge75Plus_DisTotalCountPAU totalAgeOther_DisTotalCountPAU totalAllAges_DisTotalCountPAU maleAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU maleAge5to17_DisHHsPAU maleAge18to34_DisHHsPAU maleAge35to64_DisHHsPAU maleAge65to74_DisHHsPAU maleAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU maleAgeOther_DisHHsPAU maleAllAges_DisHHsPAU femaleAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU femaleAge5to17_DisHHsPAU Total disabled persons age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total disabled persons of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of disabled persons, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male below age 5 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled male of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female below age 5 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) 51 femaleAge18to34_DisHHsPAU femaleAge35to64_DisHHsPAU femaleAge65to74_DisHHsPAU femaleAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU femaleAgeOther_DisHHsPAU femaleAllAges_DisHHsPAU totalAgeBel5_DisHHsPAU totalAge5to17_DisHHsPAU totalAge18to34_DisHHsPAU totalAge35to64_DisHHsPAU totalAge65to74_DisHHsPAU totalAge75Plus_DisHHsPAU totalAgeOther_DisHHsPAU totalAllAges_DisHHsPAU Total households with at least one disabled female age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled female of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person below age 5 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 5-17 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 18-34 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 35-64 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 65-74 per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person age 75 or higher per assisted household (up to age 110) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person of any other age (not reported or over age 110) per assisted household (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) Total households with at least one disabled person of any age per assisted household (including observations with erroneous age values below 0 or over 110, or that are blank) (equals -1 if the total number of households, i.e. the numerator, is less than 10) DISABLED HOUSEHOLD COUNT BY HOUSEHOLD INCOME . XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A Variable Description hhNation Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the 52 HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) hhState hhCounty hhPlace hhPHA hhProj HUDProgCategory totalDisabledCount L30_DisHHs L50ButNotL30_DisHHs L80ButNotL50_DisHHs aboveL80_DisHHs State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) HUD Program Category (See Table 1 for how these are determined) Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person, for which household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI (i.e. total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or ext_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y”, within the HUD longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person, for which household income is greater than 30 percent, but less than or equal to 50%, of HAMFI (i.e. ext_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ very_low_inc_lmt_amnt, or [very_low_inc_lmt_indr equals “Y” and ext_low_inc_lmt_indr does not equal “Y”], within the HUD longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person, for which household income is greater than 50 percent, but less than or equal to 80%, of HAMFI (i.e. very_low_inc_lmt_amnt < total_annl_incm_amnt ≤ low_inc_lmt_amnt, within the HUD longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Total number of HUD-assisted households with at least one disabled person, for which household income is greater than or equal to 80 percent of HAMFI (i.e. total_annl_incm_amnt > low_inc_lmt_amnt or no income information is given, within the HUD longitudinal file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) DISABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENTS . XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A Variable Description hhNation hhState hhCounty Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) State FIPS (using unit_fips_state_cd from HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) County FIPS (using unit_fips_cnty_cd from HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) 53 hhPlace hhPHA hhProj totDisabledPerPHHH totalDisabledHHs pctTotalDisabledHHs reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis pctReqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis pctRecvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis reqstdAndRecvd_Dis Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for TRACS observations and dvlpt_num from 50058/MTW observations from HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) Number of disabled persons per public housing househehold (calculated as the summation of disabled individuals contained in all public housing households, divided by the total number of public housing households) (equals -1 if total number of units, i.e. the denominator, is less than 10) Number of public housing households with at least one disabled person (i.e. the sum of public housing households (determined using the methods outlined under variable totalPHObs)) with at least one disabled person) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person (equals -1 if the numerator is less than 10) Number of public housing households with at least one disabled person requesting disability features (tallying the total number of households for which either 1) acsblty_rqstd_indr equals “Y” or 2) acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” through “6” (i.e. does not equal 0, nor is blank), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of public housing households with no disabled persons requesting disability features (determined using the method previously outlined for the preceding variable, reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person requesting disability features (reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis times 100 divided by reqstdAccssbltFtrs_Dis plus reqstdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) Number of public housing households with at least one disabled person receiving disability features (tallying the total number of households for which acsblty_rcvd_indr equals “1” or “2” [i.e. the household fully - “1” - or partially - “2” - received accessibility features that were requested]), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of public housing households with no disabled persons receiving disability features (determined using the method previously outlined for the preceding variable, recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis), within the HUD longitudinal file (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person receiving disability features (recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis times 100 divided by recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis plus recvdAccssbltFtrs_NoDis) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) Number of public housing households 1) with at least one disabled person and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately received them 54 reqstdAndRecvd_NoDis pctReqstdAndRecvd_Dis pctReqstdAndRecvd_NoDis totalPHObs pctDisHHsWithAccssbltyFtrs Number of public housing households 1) with no disabled persons and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately received them Percent of public housing households 1) with at least one disabled person and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately received them Percent of public housing households 1) with no disabled persons and 2) which requested accessibility features, which ultimately received them Total public housing households (defined as households for which the variable “pgm_type_cd” equals “P” and which, while not labeled with pgm_type_cd “P”, share a property_id value with a household which does have a pgm_type_cd of “P”) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of public housing households with at least one disabled person receiving housing units with disability features (The value from recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis multiplied by 100, then divided by totalDisabledHHs) (equals -1 if either value in numerator, i.e. recvdAccssbltFtrs_Dis, or the value in the denominator, i.e. the number of units, is less than 10; is blank if the total number of public housing households equals 0) DISABILITY CHARACTERISTICS OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTS .XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A Variable Description hhNation hhState hhCounty hhPlace hhPHA hhProj totalMFunits totDisabledPerMFHH Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) Total multifamily households (defined as all HUD-assisted households designated, following the procedure outlined in Table 1, for the following HUD program categories: Section 202, Section 811, Section 236, multifamily programs breaking out Section 8, and “all other”) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of disabled persons per multifamily household (i.e. the variable totalDisabledHHs, divided by the variable totalMFunits) (equals -1 if number of units, i.e. the denominator, is less than 10; is blank if the total number of multifamily units is 0) 55 totalDisabledHHs pctDisabledHHs totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld totalDisHHs_HIV pctDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld Number of households living in multifamily properties with at least one disabled person (the sum of multifamily households (determined using the methods outlined under variable totalMFunits) with at least one disabled person) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of multifamily households with at least one disabled person (the sum of multifamily households (totalDisabledHHs times 100, divided by totalMFunits) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for the elderly and disabled (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "eldrly_disabled_indicator" variable in the iREMS dbo_owner_survey file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for the disabled exclusively (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "exclusive_disabled_indicator" variable in the iREMS dbo_owner_survey file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for the chronically mentally ill (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "chronically_mentally_ill_ind" variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for the physically disabled (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "mobility_impairment_ind" or "other_impairment_ind" variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for the developmentally disabled (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "developmentally_disabled_ind" variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Number of households with at least one disabled person living in multifamily properties designated for persons with HIV (calculated using method outlined under the variable totalDisabledHHs, restricted to households in properties denoted with the "hiv_ind" variable in the iREMS dbo_client_group_occupancy_detail file) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for the elderly and disabled (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for the elderly and disabled) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_EldrlyDisbld is less 56 than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) pctDisHHs_DisbldExclsv pctDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll pctDisHHs_PhysDisbld pctDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld pctDisHHs_HIV Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for the disabled exclusively (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for the disabled exclusively) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_DisbldExclsv is less than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for the chronically mentally ill (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for the chronically mentally ill) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_ChrncMentlIll is less than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for the physically disabled (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for the physically disabled) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_PhysDisbld is less than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for the developmentally disabled (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for the developmentally disabled) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_DvlpmtDisbld is less than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) Percent of households with at least one disabled person residing in multifamily properties designated for persons with HIV (i.e. the variable totalDisHHs_HIV, multiplied by 100, divided by the total number of households residing in units designated for persons with HIV) (equals -1 if totalDisHHs_HIV is less than 10; is blank if total occupied units designated for designated group equals 0) ACCESSIBLE UNIT COUNT BY NUMBER OF BEDROOMS.XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in six sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, place, PHA, and Project) hhNation Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) hhState State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) hhCounty County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) 57 hhPlace hhPHA hhProj accessibleUnits_0to1Br accessibleUnits_2Br accessibleUnits_3Br accessibleUnits_4plusBr Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) PHA code (using pha_cd from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "PHA" worksheet) Project code (using proj_num for observations from TRACS data and dvlpt_num for observations from PIC data; reported only in "Proj" worksheet) The number of assisted households with 0 or 1 bedrooms inhabiting either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) The number of assisted households with 2 bedrooms inhabiting either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) The number of assisted households with 3 bedrooms inhabiting either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) The number of assisted households with 4 or more bedrooms inhabiting either 1) a public housing unit which is denoted as accessible (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y"), or 2) a multifamily property with features designated for the elderly+disabled, disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (according to the indicators in iREMS) (equals -1 if value is less than 10) UNAIDED INVENTORY .XLSX NOTE: this file is provided in four sheets, one for each level of geography (nation, state, county, and place); for definitions relating to household disability status, refer to Appendix A hhNation Indicator for United States (within 50 states, and District of Columbia, according to the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "Nation" worksheet only) hhState State FIPS (using the unit_fips_state_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported in "State", "City", and "County" worksheets) hhCounty County FIPS (using the unit_fips_cnty_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "County" worksheet) hhPlace Place FIPS (using the unit_place_cd variable from the HUD longitudinal file; reported only in "Place" worksheet) 58 disHHsL30 disHHsL50 disHHsL80 disHHsOverL80 disHHsAll pctDisHHsL30 pctDisHHsL50 pctDisHHsL80 pctDisHHsOverL80 AllHHs Number of total disabled households, for which household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est71 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 20082010 data] from the number of total households [as identified from the sum of variables t16_est3 and t16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled households, for which household income is greater than 30%, but less than 50%, of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est75 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total households [as identified from the sum of variables t16_est24 and t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled households, for which household income is greater than 50%, but less than 80%, of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est79 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total households [as identified from the sum of variables t16_est45 and t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled households, for which household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est83 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total households [as identified from the sum of variables t16_est66 and t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 20062010 data]) The sum of variable disHHsL30, disHHsL50, disHHsL80, disHHsOverL80 Percent of total households, among which household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsL30, then dividing by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est3 + t16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total households, among which household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsL50, then dividing by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est24 + t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total households, among which household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsL80, then dividing by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est45 + t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total households, among which household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disHHsLOverL80, then dividing by the number of total households in this income group [t16_est66 + t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) The count of all households (t16_est1 from Table 16 of CHAS, 20062010 data) 59 pctDisHHsAll disRentersL30 disRentersL50 disRentersL80 disRentersOverL80 disRentersAll pctDisRentersL30 pctDisRentersL50 pctDisRentersL80 pctDisRentersOverL80 disHHsAll, times 100, divided by the number of total households (t16_est1) Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est157 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting households [as identified from the variablet16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household income is greater than 30%, but less than 50%, of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est161 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting households [as identified from the variable t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household income is greater than 50%, but less than 80%, of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est165 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting households [as identified from the variable t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Number of total disabled, renting households, for which household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI (estimated by subtracting the number of non-disabled, renting households in this income group [as identified from the variable T6_est169 in Table 6 of the CHAS, 2008-2010 data] from the number of total renting households [as identified from the variable t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) The sum of variable disRentersL30, disRentersL50, disRentersL80, disRentersOverL80 Percent of total renting households, among which household income is less than or equal to 30% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL30, then dividing by the number of total renting households this income group [t16_est88 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total renting households, among which household income is greater than 30% but less than or equal to 50% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL50, then dividing by the number of total renting households this income group [t16_est109 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total renting households, among which household income is greater than 50% but less than or equal to 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersL80, then dividing by the number of total renting households this income group [t16_est130 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) Percent of total renting households, among which household income is greater than 80% of HAMFI, which are disabled (estimated by multiplying 100 by disRentersLOverL80, then dividing by the number of total renting households this income group [t16_est151 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data]) 60 AllRenters pctDisRentersAll unaidedDisHHsL30 unaidedDisHHsL50 unaidedDisHHsL80 unaidedDisHHsOverL80 unaidedDisHHsAll pctUnaidedDisHHsL30 pctUnaidedDisHHsL50 pctUnaidedDisHHsL80 pctUnaidedDisHHsOverL80 pctUnaidedDisHHsAll unaidedDisRentersL30 unaidedDisRentersL50 The count of all households (t16_est87 from Table 16 of CHAS, 2006-2010 data) disRentersAll, times 100, divided by the number of total households (t16_est87) disHHsL30 minus L30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L30_DisHHs is less than 10) disHHsL50 minus L50ButNotL30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L50ButNotL30_DisHHs is less than 10) disHHsL80 minus L80ButNotL50_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L80ButNotL50_DisHHs is less than 10) disHHsOverL80 minus aboveL80_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if aboveL80_DisHHs is less than 10) The sum of variable unaidedHHsL30, unaidedHHsL50, unaidedHHsL80, unaidedHHsOverL80 (equals -1 if only one of the following is equal to -1: unaidedDisHHsL30, unaidedDisHHsL50, unaidedDisHHsL80, unaidedDisHHsOverL80) unaidedDisHHsL30, times 100, divided by total household count for this income group unaidedDisHHsL50, times 100, divided by total household count for this income group unaidedDisHHsL80, times 100, divided by total household count for this income group unaidedDisHHsOverL80, times 100, divided by total household count for this income group unaidedDisHHsAll, times 100, divided by total household count disRentersL30 minus L30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L30_DisHHs is less than 10) disRentersL50 minus L50ButNotL30_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L50ButNotL30_DisHHs is less than 10) unaidedDisRentersL80 disRentersL80 minus L80ButNotL50_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if L80ButNotL50_DisHHs is less than 10) unaidedDisRentersOverL80 disRentersOverL80 minus aboveL80_DisHHs (provided from file "disabled household count by household income.xlsx") (equals -1 if aboveL80_DisHHs is less than 10) unaidedDisRentersAll The sum of variable unaidedRentersL30, unaidedRentersL50, unaidedRentersL80, unaidedRentersOverL80 (equals -1 if only one of the following is equal to -1: unaidedDisRentersL30, unaidedDisRentersL50, unaidedDisRentersL80, unaidedDisRentersOverL80) unaidedDisRentersL30, times 100, divided by total household count for this income group unaidedDisRentersL50, times 100, divided by total renting household count for this income group pctUnaidedDisRentersL30 pctUnaidedDisRentersL50 61 pctUnaidedDisRentersL80 pctDisHHsUnaidedL30 unaidedDisRentersL80, times 100, divided by total renting household count for this income group unaidedDisRentersOverL80, times 100, divided by total renting household count for this income group unaidedDisRentersAll, times 100, divided by total renting household count unaidedDisHHsL30, times 100, divided by disHHsL30 pctDisHHsUnaidedL50 unaidedDisHHsL50, times 100, divided by disHHsL50 pctDisHHsUnaidedL80 unaidedDisHHsL80, times 100, divided by disHHsL80 pctDisHHsUnaidedOverL80 unaidedDisHHsOverL80, times 100, divided by disHHsOverL80 pctDisHHsUnaidedAll unaidedDisHHsAll, times 100, divided by disHHsAll pctDisRentersUnaidedL30 unaidedDisRentersL30, times 100, divided by disRentersL30 pctDisRentersUnaidedL50 unaidedDisRentersL50, times 100, divided by disRentersL50 pctDisRentersUnaidedL80 unaidedDisRentersL80, times 100, divided by disRentersL80 pctDisRentersUnaidedOverL80 unaidedDisRentersOverL80, times 100, divided by disRentersOverL80 unaidedDisRentersAll, times 100, divided by disRentersAll pctUnaidedDisRentersOverL80 pctUnaidedDisRentersAll pctDisRentersUnaidedAll pctDisVoucherHHsInDesigOrMs pctDisMFHHsInDisProperty pctDisPHHHsInAccblUnt Percent of disabled HUD-assisted household in one of the five housing voucher programs (tenant-based/other, project-based, homeownership, designated, mainstream), whose voucher is either part of the Designated or Mainstream voucher program (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, households in a multifamily property living within a multifamily property with disability features (as indicated from iREMS) for the elderly+disabled, the disabled exclusively, the chronically mentally ill, the physically disabled, the developmentally disabled, or persons with HIV (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) Percent of disabled HUD-assisted, public housing households living within a designated accessible unit (i.e. for which acsbl_unit_indr equals "Y" in the HUD longitudinal data) (equals -1 if numerator is less than 10) 62