OYENTE

Peter Novick

  • 3
  • opiniones
  • 2
  • votos útiles
  • 10
  • calificaciones

Scientific method?

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-12-18

Fun and interesting. But I am not persuaded that his methods and his conclusions were as scientific as the “real sciences” such as physics, chemistry, etc.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Lots of wasted time

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-23-18

Each topic is only a few minutes long and is based on the work of a different professor, author, etc.
Which is okay...
The problem is that they spend half of these few minutes reciting the credentials of the author.
For example (I made this up): "John Doe, professor emeritus and holder of the cosmos chair of astronomy at Princeton University and author of the book "XYX" ... etc. It quickly becomes very annoying.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

More than I care to know

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-10-18

What did you like best about Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World? What did you like least?

I am trying to learn more about world history, but there is no way I need this level of detail about Genghis (pronounced "Jen' Gis" ).

What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!)

Didnt get anywhere near the ending,

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña