OYENTE

Brian Goss

  • 16
  • opiniones
  • 20
  • votos útiles
  • 110
  • calificaciones

A quick classic must read

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-08-24

A good primer on money and the role of technology in monetization; we are watching this play out and this book was remarkably foresightful.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Bitcoin matters

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-11-24

Having zero bitcoin is risky and the most wrong answer to the question how many bitcoin should one have?

Great story and superbly performed.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Fast paced

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-28-23

Very realistic view, doesn’t dwell on disputable details of revelation, just states plot elements as fact without delving into minutiae.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A sobering view of a plausible dystopian future

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-19-23

EMP attack is probably the only way any other nation on earth could stop the American military…indirectly by causing chaos at home. This book is about what that would look like.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Timely & fitting

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-06-23

Evil exists. Fortunately, most never experience it. This allows politicians to exploit people’s fear of tools to garner easy votes. But it’s precisely these tools, broadly wielded, that offer the best protection against evil.

This was obvious to our forefathers. Yet we forget so quickly.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Proof even people with Trump Derangement Syndrome can be Anti-Authoritarian

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-16-22

Author clearly has TDS, but maybe that will help the important message of limiting government power this book eventually outlines spread more easily amongst those in power.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Yea, the Jan 6 temper tantrum was bad

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-09-22

But an insurrection it obviously was not. Those that seek to institute tyranny don’t want you using your brain, but might does not make right

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Clearly biased, but a peak at the future

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-07-22

Clearly biased and mixes valid self defense with invalid murder…but the book does offer a peak into the future as it discusses a very plausible assassination plan.

If you can filter out the lefty propaganda, there are important topics discussed that should concern everyone.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Skip the longer books

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-30-19

Basic info well applied. Longer texts on this don’t delve deep enough to justify their length.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Misses the mark on a few things

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-08-18

Briefly acknowledges that armed citizenry acts as a safeguard against tyranny, but then dismissed the entire notion due to advanced military weaponry owned by the nation state. This simple view implies that only nation states can be tyrannical (armed revolt against local government has a precedent in the US) and that citizens armed with the weapons of an average soldier would be incapable of defending against nation state tyranny. Similar simple argument regarding magazine capacity restrictions…that large capacity magazines could never help for self defense (dubious claim) and therefore should be limited.

There are better analyses out there.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas