Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

A Selection of Writings from HG Wells: The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau
A Selection of Writings from HG Wells: The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau
A Selection of Writings from HG Wells: The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau
Ebook482 pages9 hours

A Selection of Writings from HG Wells: The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A collection of classic novels by HG Wells. Wells combined an encyclopedic knowledge of science, a utopian political idealism, a visionary ability to extrapolate into the future, and a pessimistic view of human nature, to produce some of the best-known classics of science fiction. "The Time Machine". "The Invisible Man", and "The Island of Dr Moreau". With a new biographical Introduction.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherLenny Flank
Release dateJun 14, 2014
ISBN9781311563293
A Selection of Writings from HG Wells: The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau
Author

Lenny Flank

Longtime social activist, labor organizer, environmental organizer, antiwar.

Read more from Lenny Flank

Related to A Selection of Writings from HG Wells

Related ebooks

Classics For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for A Selection of Writings from HG Wells

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    A Selection of Writings from HG Wells - Lenny Flank

    A Selection of Writings From

    HG Wells

    The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The Island of Dr Moreau

    by HG Wells

    Edited and with Introduction by Lenny Flank

    Red and Black Publishers, St Petersburg, FL

    Smashwords Edition, License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each person you share it with. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then you should return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

    Contents

    Editor’s Preface

    The Time Machine

    The Invisible Man

    The Island of Dr Moreau

    Editor’s Preface

    Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. –HG Wells

    HG Wells has been called the first modern science fiction writer. His stories combined an encyclopedic knowledge of science, a utopian political idealism, a visionary ability to extrapolate into the future, and a pessimistic view of human nature.

    Herbert George Wells was born in 1866 in a small town near London. His family lived at the edge of poverty—a small inheritance enabled his parents to set up a small sporting goods shop, which was supplemented by his father’s sporadic work as a professional cricket player.

    In 1874, the young Wells broke his leg in an accident and was confined to bed for several months. His father brought him books from the local library to spend the time, and it was then that Wells decided to be a writer. A short time later, he was sent to the Thomas Morley’s Commercial Academy, a private school.

    In 1880, an injury ended his father’s career as a professional cricket player, and Wells and his brothers had to find jobs to support the family. Wells first became a draper, then apprenticed to a chemist. In between, he was a student at the Midhurst Grammar School. In 1863, he became an assistant tutor at Midhurst, and a year later, Wells won a scholarship to the Normal School of Science, where he got a degree in biology, studying under Thomas Huxley—the prominent scientist who had popularized and defended Darwin’s theory of evolution.

    Wells also took an interest in politics and social reform, and joined the school Debating Club. He also joined the Fabian Society, a group of socialist reformers which included several leading English literary figures. In later years, Wells ran for office several times on the (then-radically-socialist) Labor Party ticket. He remained a socialist all his life.

    Wells had an authoritarian and elitist streak in him, however, and his writings always presented a pessimistic view of humanity’s ability to save itself. On several occasions he suggested that most people were too ignorant and uneducated to run their own government, and opined that perhaps the vote should be restricted to highly educated scientists and other intelligentsia. Wells became involved with the eugenics movement which was then popular in Europe and the United States. The eugenicists argued that humanity could be improved if the weak were prevented from reproducing and passing on their inferior genes. The eugenics movement led to a number of programs in Europe and the US in which mentally feeble people or convicted criminals were forcibly sterilized—culminating later in the Nazi horrors of euthanasia and extermination.

    While at the Normal School, Wells helped found the Science School Journal, and wrote a number of articles and stories. He also wrote a short story titled The Chronic Argonauts, his first science fiction story.

    In 1895, Wells returned to the time-traveller theme of The Chronic Argonauts and wrote his first science fiction novel, The Time Machine. Although other writers had used time travel as a story element, Wells was the first to base his fiction on real scientific findings. As Wells was writing the book, physics was just undergoing the opening stages of the quantum revolution, and the idea of time as a fourth dimension was first being seriously discussed (within ten years Einstein would use his theory of relativity to unify these four dimensions into a single spacetime). In describing the future through which the time machine traveled, Wells also made use of an emerging understanding of astronomy, describing how the sun, in the far future, swelled in the sky as it became a red giant, and how the earth, gradually losing its rotational energy, becomes tidally locked in its orbit so the same side always faces the sun.

    Wells’ understanding of biology, taught to him by Huxley (Darwin’s Bulldog) is also apparent in the novel, as he uses the principles of evolutionary biology to describe the future humans as two distinct species, each split off from the single parent.

    The futuristic story of the Eloi and the Morlocks is based on Wells’ socialist view of classes and the hypocrisy of Victorian England. Like English capitalism, the future world was divided into two classes. One class did all the work and ran all the machinery, while the other class lived a life of indolent luxury. In Wells’ future world, one upper group literally lives in the light, while the other lower group literally lives in the darkness. In this future world, however, the Morlocks have overthrown the Victorian social order, and the lower-class inhabitants of the darkness, driven by starvation and poverty, have taken control and now feed on (literally) the upper class.

    Central to this theme is Wells’ scathing criticism of the then-popular theory of Social Darwinism. Popularized by Herbert Spencer, Social Darwinism claims to apply the scientific principles of evolution and natural selection to human society, and declares that the ruling elite in any human society (such as, for instance, English industrialists) got to be the rulers because they are the most fit, and thus they naturally rise to the top because of their inherent superiority. In Victorian England and particularly in the United States, with its rigid and stark class distinctions and its tiny elite of wealthy robber barons, this view was enthusiastically embraced as a scientific justification for capitalist society. Many Social Darwinists also preached eugenics, as a way to maintain the purity of those who were fittest.

    While Wells was himself sympathetic to eugenics, he flatly rejected Social Darwinism and, as a trained biologist, saw the fatal flaw in its reasoning—perfect adaptation to the environment does not make a species stronger, it makes it evolutionarily weaker. Without the need for further adaptation and development, the species becomes stagnant and easily falls into extinction when its environment changes. In evolution, the most vigorous species are those which are constantly adapting to a diverse variety of habitats and challenges. Species which are comfortable and unable to adapt to challenges, fall victim to species which can. In The Time Machine, Wells points to the logical conclusion of the Social Darwinist theory.

    Wells’ next book was The Island of Dr Moreau, published in 1896. Once again, Wells was able to combine a current social idea with a knowledge of science, into a penetrating social commentary. By the end of the 19th century, medical science was making enormous strides. Biological and anatomical studies, and the theory of evolution, had demonstrated the underlying unity of life, including the remarkable similarity between humans and other animals. It was even thought that the understanding of the spark of life itself was beginning to be understood (an idea that had been explored in 1818 in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein).

    Wells drew from contemporary headlines in his book. Medical experiments, including vivisections on living animals (most often without any anesthesia) were a common practice at the time—and so were protests against it. In 1875, the Society for the Protection of Animals Liable to Vivisection was formed, the first animal rights group in England—which led in 1898 to the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection. Today, in an era where genetic alterations and xenotransplants make it entirely possible to combine traits of different species, the social debate over medical experimentation has returned with a vengeance.

    Wells used that current social debate as the framework within which to weave together a number of themes. The most immediately apparent theme, of course, is human cruelty. The character of Dr Moreau is depicted as arrogant, self-absorbed, and indifferent to all the pain and suffering he causes in the name of his idealistic goal. Nevertheless, real human doctors outdid even Moreau in cruelty—as the barbaric Dr Mengele in Auschwitz, and the horrifying medical research carried out in the United States on humans around syphilis, radiation and others, later demonstrated.

    Also apparent is the theme of science as god. Moreau’s conceit is that he believes he not only has the right to intervene in the process of evolution and manipulate life at will, but that he can ultimately control that life to his own ends (a theme that was taken up 100 years later in Michael Crichton’s Jurassic Park).

    Moreau is a godlike figure, literally, to his creations. And within this, we can see some of Wells’ own views on religion. Moreau is not really God—he does not create new life, he merely alters existing life. Moreau is therefore the Church, the representative of God who speaks with Holy Authority. In Moreau’s island, of course, there is no God—as the sole religious authority, Moreau simply makes up his own Law for his own purposes, indoctrinating the Beast Men and trusting that their simple-mindedness will keep them obedient and submissive. The rulers of Dr Moreau’s island do not depend solely upon brute force to maintain control (although they do use the constant threat of the House of Pain). Instead, Moreau uses his religious authority and The Law to prevent the Beast Men, who far outnumber the rulers, from uniting in common action. Similarly, as a socialist, Wells viewed Victorian England as an island where the ruling class used the Church’s religious authority (and the state’s law and jails) to uphold the existing order and to keep the lower classes obedient.

    Just a year after The Island of Dr Moreau, Wells wrote the third of his classic science fiction novels –The Invisible Man. The central theme of this novel, like the earlier ones, revolves around science and scientists, and their attempts to control and manipulate nature. In The Invisible Man, Wells moves on to the topic of morality—what would a man do if he could get away with anything? Could scientists—who Wells himself had always viewed as the best of men--be safely trusted not to abuse the enormous powers they controlled?

    There is also an underlying theme about individuality and social needs—the Invisible Man, unseen by everyone around him, nevertheless finds that he has an unstoppable need to be a part of society, to associate with those around him. He expends enormous effort to find a way to fit in and remain a functioning part of society, but when all these methods fail, he locks himself away from other humans, drives everyone out, and his forced solitude drives him insane.

    The next year, Wells wrote his fourth book, which would become the most famous of his science fiction classics—The War of the Worlds. It contained the same themes of science, biology, and pessimism of humanity’s capacity to save itself.

    After War of the Worlds, Wells’ novels took a more distinctly political and social aim. When the Sleeper Wakes, written in 1899, centers around a man who falls asleep for 200 years, awakens in a future society where the ruling elite have complete control, and ends up leading a revolution to topple the rulers. In 1905, he wrote A Modern Utopia, in which a futuristic socialist society is depicted. A year later, he published In the Days of the Comet, in which humans, preparing enthusiastically for a disastrous large-scale war, are affected by mysterious vapors from a passing comet, which clears their minds and turns them from their destructive course.

    As the First World War approached, however, and tensions began to rise in Europe, Wells became darker and more pessimistic. His 1914 novel The World Set Free deals with a massive war in which atomic bombs explode for days at a time, wreaking widespread destruction. In 1933, as Hitler rose to power in Germany, Wells wrote The Shape of Things to Come, which featured the then-fantastic idea of entire cities being destroyed by massive airplane attacks, as well as submarine-launched missiles, during a world war. Wells later said that these novels were not predictions; they were warnings.

    Wells died in London in August 1946. A few years before his death, in the preface to a reprint of one of his lesser-known works, The War in the Air, he had written that his epitaph should read: "I told you so, you damn fools."

    The Time Machine

    I

    The Time Traveller (for so it will be convenient to speak of him) was expounding a recondite matter to us. His grey eyes shone and twinkled, and his usually pale face was flushed and animated. The fire burned brightly, and the soft radiance of the incandescent lights in the lilies of silver caught the bubbles that flashed and passed in our glasses. Our chairs, being his patents, embraced and caressed us rather than submitted to be sat upon, and there was that luxurious after-dinner atmosphere when thought roams gracefully free of the trammels of precision. And he put it to us in this way—marking the points with a lean forefinger—as we sat and lazily admired his earnestness over this new paradox (as we thought it) and his fecundity.

    You must follow me carefully. I shall have to controvert one or two ideas that are almost universally accepted. The geometry, for instance, they taught you at school is founded on a misconception.

    Is not that rather a large thing to expect us to begin upon? said Filby, an argumentative person with red hair.

    "I do not mean to ask you to accept anything without reasonable ground for it. You will soon admit as much as I need from you. You know of course that a mathematical line, a line of thickness nil, has no real existence. They taught you that? Neither has a mathematical plane. These things are mere abstractions."

    That is all right, said the Psychologist.

    Nor, having only length, breadth, and thickness, can a cube have a real existence.

    There I object, said Filby. Of course a solid body may exist. All real things—

    "So most people think. But wait a moment. Can an instantaneous cube exist?"

    Don’t follow you, said Filby.

    Can a cube that does not last for any time at all, have a real existence?

    Filby became pensive. Clearly, the Time Traveller proceeded, "any real body must have extension in four directions: it must have Length, Breadth, Thickness, and—Duration. But through a natural infirmity of the flesh, which I will explain to you in a moment, we incline to overlook this fact. There are really four dimensions, three which we call the three planes of Space, and a fourth, Time. There is, however, a tendency to draw an unreal distinction between the former three dimensions and the latter, because it happens that our consciousness moves intermittently in one direction along the latter from the beginning to the end of our lives."

    That, said a very young man, making spasmodic efforts to relight his cigar over the lamp; That ... very clear indeed.

    Now, it is very remarkable that this is so extensively overlooked, continued the Time Traveller, with a slight accession of cheerfulness. "Really this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves along it. But some foolish people have got hold of the wrong side of that idea. You have all heard what they have to say about this Fourth Dimension?"

    "I have not," said the Provincial Mayor.

    "It is simply this. That Space, as our mathematicians have it, is spoken of as having three dimensions, which one may call Length, Breadth, and Thickness, and is always definable by reference to three planes, each at right angles to the others. But some philosophical people have been asking why three dimensions particularly—why not another direction at right angles to the other three?—and have even tried to construct a Four-Dimension geometry. Professor Simon Newcomb was expounding this to the New York Mathematical Society only a month or so ago. You know how on a flat surface, which has only two dimensions, we can represent a figure of a three-dimensional solid, and similarly they think that by models of three dimensions they could represent one of four—if they could master the perspective of the thing. See?"

    I think so, murmured the Provincial Mayor; and, knitting his brows, he lapsed into an introspective state, his lips moving as one who repeats mystic words. Yes, I think I see it now, he said after some time, brightening in a quite transitory manner.

    Well, I do not mind telling you I have been at work upon this geometry of Four Dimensions for some time. Some of my results are curious. For instance, here is a portrait of a man at eight years old, another at fifteen, another at seventeen, another at twenty-three, and so on. All these are evidently sections, as it were, Three-Dimensional representations of his Four-Dimensioned being, which is a fixed and unalterable thing.

    Scientific people, proceeded the Time Traveller, after the pause required for the proper assimilation of this, know very well that Time is only a kind of Space. Here is a popular scientific diagram, a weather record. This line I trace with my finger shows the movement of the barometer. Yesterday it was so high, yesterday night it fell, then this morning it rose again, and so gently upward to here. Surely the mercury did not trace this line in any of the dimensions of Space generally recognized? But certainly it traced such a line, and that line, therefore, we must conclude was along the Time-Dimension.

    But, said the Medical Man, staring hard at a coal in the fire, if Time is really only a fourth dimension of Space, why is it, and why has it always been, regarded as something different? And why cannot we move in Time as we move about in the other dimensions of Space?

    The Time Traveller smiled. Are you sure we can move freely in Space? Right and left we can go, backward and forward freely enough, and men always have done so. I admit we move freely in two dimensions. But how about up and down? Gravitation limits us there.

    Not exactly, said the Medical Man. There are balloons.

    But before the balloons, save for spasmodic jumping and the inequalities of the surface, man had no freedom of vertical movement.

    Still they could move a little up and down, said the Medical Man.

    Easier, far easier down than up.

    And you cannot move at all in Time, you cannot get away from the present moment.

    "My dear sir, that is just where you are wrong. That is just where the whole world has gone wrong. We are always getting away from the present moment. Our mental existences, which are immaterial and have no dimensions, are passing along the Time-Dimension with a uniform velocity from the cradle to the grave. Just as we should travel down if we began our existence fifty miles above the earth’s surface."

    But the great difficulty is this, interrupted the Psychologist. "You can move about in all directions of Space, but you cannot move about in Time."

    That is the germ of my great discovery. But you are wrong to say that we cannot move about in Time. For instance, if I am recalling an incident very vividly I go back to the instant of its occurrence: I become absent-minded, as you say. I jump back for a moment. Of course we have no means of staying back for any length of Time, any more than a savage or an animal has of staying six feet above the ground. But a civilized man is better off than the savage in this respect. He can go up against gravitation in a balloon, and why should he not hope that ultimately he may be able to stop or accelerate his drift along the Time-Dimension, or even turn about and travel the other way?

    "Oh, this, began Filby, is all—"

    Why not? said the Time Traveller.

    It’s against reason, said Filby.

    What reason? said the Time Traveller.

    You can show black is white by argument, said Filby, but you will never convince me.

    Possibly not, said the Time Traveller. But now you begin to see the object of my investigations into the geometry of Four Dimensions. Long ago I had a vague inkling of a machine—

    To travel through Time! exclaimed the Very Young Man.

    That shall travel indifferently in any direction of Space and Time, as the driver determines.

    Filby contented himself with laughter.

    But I have experimental verification, said the Time Traveller.

    It would be remarkably convenient for the historian, the Psychologist suggested. One might travel back and verify the accepted account of the Battle of Hastings, for instance!

    Don’t you think you would attract attention? said the Medical Man. Our ancestors had no great tolerance for anachronisms.

    One might get one’s Greek from the very lips of Homer and Plato, the Very Young Man thought.

    In which case they would certainly plough you for the Little-go. The German scholars have improved Greek so much.

    Then there is the future, said the Very Young Man. Just think! One might invest all one’s money, leave it to accumulate at interest, and hurry on ahead!

    To discover a society, said I, erected on a strictly communistic basis.

    Of all the wild extravagant theories! began the Psychologist.

    Yes, so it seemed to me, and so I never talked of it until—

    Experimental verification! cried I. "You are going to verify that?"

    The experiment! cried Filby, who was getting brain-weary.

    Let’s see your experiment anyhow, said the Psychologist, though it’s all humbug, you know.

    The Time Traveller smiled round at us. Then, still smiling faintly, and with his hands deep in his trousers pockets, he walked slowly out of the room, and we heard his slippers shuffling down the long passage to his laboratory.

    The Psychologist looked at us. I wonder what he’s got?

    Some sleight-of-hand trick or other, said the Medical Man, and Filby tried to tell us about a conjurer he had seen at Burslem; but before he had finished his preface the Time Traveller came back, and Filby’s anecdote collapsed.

    The thing the Time Traveller held in his hand was a glittering metallic framework, scarcely larger than a small clock, and very delicately made. There was ivory in it, and some transparent crystalline substance. And now I must be explicit, for this that follows—unless his explanation is to be accepted—is an absolutely unaccountable thing. He took one of the small octagonal tables that were scattered about the room, and set it in front of the fire, with two legs on the hearthrug. On this table he placed the mechanism. Then he drew up a chair, and sat down. The only other object on the table was a small shaded lamp, the bright light of which fell upon the model. There were also perhaps a dozen candles about, two in brass candlesticks upon the mantel and several in sconces, so that the room was brilliantly illuminated. I sat in a low arm-chair nearest the fire, and I drew this forward so as to be almost between the Time Traveller and the fireplace. Filby sat behind him, looking over his shoulder. The Medical Man and the Provincial Mayor watched him in profile from the right, the Psychologist from the left. The Very Young Man stood behind the Psychologist. We were all on the alert. It appears incredible to me that any kind of trick, however subtly conceived and however adroitly done, could have been played upon us under these conditions.

    The Time Traveller looked at us, and then at the mechanism. Well? said the Psychologist.

    This little affair, said the Time Traveller, resting his elbows upon the table and pressing his hands together above the apparatus, is only a model. It is my plan for a machine to travel through time. You will notice that it looks singularly askew, and that there is an odd twinkling appearance about this bar, as though it was in some way unreal. He pointed to the part with his finger. Also, here is one little white lever, and here is another.

    The Medical Man got up out of his chair and peered into the thing. It’s beautifully made, he said.

    It took two years to make, retorted the Time Traveller. Then, when we had all imitated the action of the Medical Man, he said: Now I want you clearly to understand that this lever, being pressed over, sends the machine gliding into the future, and this other reverses the motion. This saddle represents the seat of a time traveller. Presently I am going to press the lever, and off the machine will go. It will vanish, pass into future Time, and disappear. Have a good look at the thing. Look at the table too, and satisfy yourselves there is no trickery. I don’t want to waste this model, and then be told I’m a quack.

    There was a minute’s pause perhaps. The Psychologist seemed about to speak to me, but changed his mind. Then the Time Traveller put forth his finger towards the lever. No, he said suddenly. Lend me your hand. And turning to the Psychologist, he took that individual’s hand in his own and told him to put out his forefinger. So that it was the Psychologist himself who sent forth the model Time Machine on its interminable voyage. We all saw the lever turn. I am absolutely certain there was no trickery. There was a breath of wind, and the lamp flame jumped. One of the candles on the mantel was blown out, and the little machine suddenly swung round, became indistinct, was seen as a ghost for a second perhaps, as an eddy of faintly glittering brass and ivory; and it was gone—vanished! Save for the lamp the table was bare.

    Everyone was silent for a minute. Then Filby said he was damned.

    The Psychologist recovered from his stupor, and suddenly looked under the table. At that the Time Traveller laughed cheerfully. Well? he said, with a reminiscence of the Psychologist. Then, getting up, he went to the tobacco jar on the mantel, and with his back to us began to fill his pipe.

    We stared at each other. Look here, said the Medical Man, are you in earnest about this? Do you seriously believe that that machine has travelled into time?

    Certainly, said the Time Traveller, stooping to light a spill at the fire. Then he turned, lighting his pipe, to look at the Psychologist’s face. (The Psychologist, to show that he was not unhinged, helped himself to a cigar and tried to light it uncut.) What is more, I have a big machine nearly finished in there—he indicated the laboratory—and when that is put together I mean to have a journey on my own account.

    You mean to say that that machine has travelled into the future? said Filby.

    Into the future or the past—I don’t, for certain, know which.

    After an interval the Psychologist had an inspiration. It must have gone into the past if it has gone anywhere, he said.

    Why? said the Time Traveller.

    Because I presume that it has not moved in space, and if it travelled into the future it would still be here all this time, since it must have travelled through this time.

    But, I said, If it travelled into the past it would have been visible when we came first into this room; and last Thursday when we were here; and the Thursday before that; and so forth!

    Serious objections, remarked the Provincial Mayor, with an air of impartiality, turning towards the Time Traveller.

    Not a bit, said the Time Traveller, and, to the Psychologist: You think. You can explain that. It’s presentation below the threshold, you know, diluted presentation.

    Of course, said the Psychologist, and reassured us. That’s a simple point of psychology. I should have thought of it. It’s plain enough, and helps the paradox delightfully. We cannot see it, nor can we appreciate this machine, any more than we can the spoke of a wheel spinning, or a bullet flying through the air. If it is travelling through time fifty times or a hundred times faster than we are, if it gets through a minute while we get through a second, the impression it creates will of course be only one-fiftieth or one-hundredth of what it would make if it were not travelling in time. That’s plain enough. He passed his hand through the space in which the machine had been. You see? he said, laughing.

    We sat and stared at the vacant table for a minute or so. Then the Time Traveller asked us what we thought of it all.

    It sounds plausible enough tonight, said the Medical Man; but wait until tomorrow. Wait for the common sense of the morning.

    Would you like to see the Time Machine itself? asked the Time Traveller. And therewith, taking the lamp in his hand, he led the way down the long, draughty corridor to his laboratory. I remember vividly the flickering light, his queer, broad head in silhouette, the dance of the shadows, how we all followed him, puzzled but incredulous, and how there in the laboratory we beheld a larger edition of the little mechanism which we had seen vanish from before our eyes. Parts were of nickel, parts of ivory, parts had certainly been filed or sawn out of rock crystal. The thing was generally complete, but the twisted crystalline bars lay unfinished upon the bench beside some sheets of drawings, and I took one up for a better look at it. Quartz it seemed to be.

    Look here, said the Medical Man, are you perfectly serious? Or is this a trick—like that ghost you showed us last Christmas?

    Upon that machine, said the Time Traveller, holding the lamp aloft, I intend to explore time. Is that plain? I was never more serious in my life.

    None of us quite knew how to take it.

    I caught Filby’s eye over the shoulder of the Medical Man, and he winked at me solemnly.

    II

    I think that at that time none of us quite believed in the Time Machine. The fact is, the Time Traveller was one of those men who are too clever to be believed: you never felt that you saw all round him; you always suspected some subtle reserve, some ingenuity in ambush, behind his lucid frankness. Had Filby shown the model and explained the matter in the Time Traveller’s words, we should have shown him far less scepticism. For we should have perceived his motives; a pork butcher could understand Filby. But the Time Traveller had more than a touch of whim among his elements, and we distrusted him. Things that would have made the frame of a less clever man seemed tricks in his hands. It is a mistake to do things too easily. The serious people who took him seriously never felt quite sure of his deportment; they were somehow aware that trusting their reputations for judgment with him was like furnishing a nursery with egg-shell china. So I don’t think any of us said very much about time travelling in the interval between that Thursday and the next, though its odd potentialities ran, no doubt, in most of our minds: its plausibility, that is, its practical incredibleness, the curious possibilities of anachronism and of utter confusion it suggested. For my own part, I was particularly preoccupied with the trick of the model. That I remember discussing with the Medical Man, whom I met on Friday at the Linnaean. He said he had seen a similar thing at Tubingen, and laid considerable stress on the blowing out of the candle. But how the trick was done he could not explain.

    The next Thursday I went again to Richmond—I suppose I was one of the Time Traveller’s most constant guests—and, arriving late, found four or five men already assembled in his drawing-room. The Medical Man was standing before the fire with a sheet of paper in one hand and his watch in the other. I looked round for the Time Traveller, and—It’s half-past seven now, said the Medical Man. I suppose we’d better have dinner?

    Where’s——? said I, naming our host.

    You’ve just come? It’s rather odd. He’s unavoidably detained. He asks me in this note to lead off with dinner at seven if he’s not back. Says he’ll explain when he comes.

    It seems a pity to let the dinner spoil, said the Editor of a well-known daily paper; and thereupon the Doctor rang the bell.

    The Psychologist was the only person besides the Doctor and myself who had attended the previous dinner. The other men were Blank, the Editor aforementioned, a certain journalist, and another—a quiet, shy man with a beard—whom I didn’t know, and who, as far as my observation went, never opened his mouth all the evening. There was some speculation at the dinner-table about the Time Traveller’s absence, and I suggested time travelling, in a half-jocular spirit. The Editor wanted that explained to him, and the Psychologist volunteered a wooden account of the ingenious paradox and trick we had witnessed that day week. He was in the midst of his exposition when the door from the corridor opened slowly and without noise. I was facing the door, and saw it first. Hallo! I said. At last! And the door opened wider, and the Time Traveller stood before us. I gave a cry of surprise. Good heavens! Man, what’s the matter? cried the Medical Man, who saw him next. And the whole tableful turned towards the door.

    He was in an amazing plight. His coat was dusty and dirty, and smeared with green down the sleeves; his hair disordered, and as it seemed to me greyer—either with dust and dirt or because its colour had actually faded. His face was ghastly pale; his chin had a brown cut on it—a cut half healed; his expression was haggard and drawn, as by intense suffering. For a moment he hesitated in the doorway, as if he had been dazzled by the light. Then he came into the room. He walked with just such a limp as I have seen in footsore tramps. We stared at him in silence, expecting him to speak.

    He said not a word, but came painfully to the table, and made a motion towards the wine. The Editor filled a glass of champagne, and pushed it towards him. He drained it, and it seemed to do him good: for he looked round the table, and the ghost of his old smile flickered across his face. What on earth have you been up to, man? said the Doctor. The Time Traveller did not seem to hear. Don’t let me disturb you, he said, with a certain faltering articulation. I’m all right. He stopped, held out his glass for more, and took it off at a draught. That’s good, he said. His eyes grew brighter, and a faint colour came into his cheeks. His glance flickered over our faces with a certain dull approval, and then went round the warm and comfortable room. Then he spoke again, still as it were feeling his way among his words. I’m going to wash and dress, and then I’ll come down and explain things ... Save me some of that mutton. I’m starving for a bit of meat.

    He looked across at the Editor, who was a rare visitor, and hoped he was all right. The Editor began a question. Tell you presently, said the Time Traveller. I’m—funny! Be all right in a minute.

    He put down his glass, and walked towards the staircase door. Again I remarked his lameness and the soft padding sound of his footfall, and standing up in my place, I saw his feet as he went out. He had nothing on them but a pair of tattered, blood-stained socks. Then the door closed upon him. I had half a mind to follow, till I remembered how he detested any fuss about himself. For a minute, perhaps, my mind was wool-gathering. Then, Remarkable Behaviour of an Eminent Scientist, I heard the Editor say, thinking (after his wont) in headlines. And this brought my attention back to the bright dinner-table.

    What’s the game? said the Journalist. Has he been doing the Amateur Cadger? I don’t follow. I met the eye of the Psychologist, and read my own interpretation in his face. I thought of the Time Traveller limping painfully upstairs. I don’t think any one else had noticed his lameness.

    The first to recover completely from this surprise was the Medical Man, who rang the bell—the Time Traveller hated to have servants waiting at dinner—for a hot plate. At that the Editor turned to his knife and fork with a grunt, and the Silent Man followed suit. The dinner

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1