Tomorrow's World Order

ONE

OVERVIEW

NATURAL STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT

What is the purpose of life? What are we to do here on earth as humans?    What have we done so far as humans and is that all we can do? Have we operated at our expected best over the centuries? If not, why and what are we missing? Is this what is expected of humankind? What can we do as a people to achieve that? What has gone wrong and why?

I personally think that humanity has failed simply because, for the past 2000 years, we have gone in a circle round and round but without achieving anything. We are still stuck in the ‘medieval ages.’ We have lacked superior thinking over the past 2000 years.  Why? One might ask. Fear. That thing called fear has controlled every aspect of mankind. Will you be surprised to find out that over the past 2000 years mankind was and still is in the defensive stages of development? Defensive stages? What is that animal?

Okay, I will explain.

Everything in life has stages of development and happenings. First, let’s look at human life. When a baby is born, it goes into different stages of development.  I will put these stages into five categories.

Stage One

In this stage, children start understanding life and learning things about themselves. They perceive life through their senses, feelings, the sight of objects and things around them. In this stage, they have no memory at all so everything they are doing is through senses, seeing and touch. Fear is at the greatest because they don’t know what to expect. All their senses are heightened. Their primary goal is defense. Fear of the unknown. In this stage, they are learning about pain and other feelings.

Stage Two

The child has gathered some information about the surroundings and life itself. The memory bank has developed to such an extent that the baby starts to understand life. The baby as it grows starts to link things and connect things using experiences in the memory bank and current analysis of the environment and life to make informed decisions. In the first stage, and in this stage the baby is egocentric. Egocentrism plays a major role in the life of the child, and all decisions are in line with this notion. The baby thinks about itself. Its protection and well-being.

Stage Three

Now the child is fully aware that life does not revolve around himself or herself. The child fully understands life and now has developed a huge memory bank to rely upon and use in its judgment. This stage is characterized by a complex analysis of different factors, systems, feelings, etc. to arrive at a decision. The child is less egocentric and more intuitive. This stage is characterized by networking, cooperation with others and the establishment of relationships with friends and the idea to learn from nature and others. The child here is fully aware that there are so many things to life than what is around him. The brain develops much faster as the child is exposed to new and different situations. The brain is bombarded by a lot of new things to learn and analyze. Relationships and networking are at the greatest, as kids spend more time with their friends than at home with parents. Special bonds develop and secret oaths of friendship are made. There is mutual thinking that networking and cooperation are beneficial. There is generally a belief among the kids that networking and cooperation is highly beneficial and a MUST. The child now understands that others are different and might hold different views to theirs. The idea here now is to establish common ground and understand the idea of mutual inclusive and exclusive. The idea is not to disregard the others but to understand each other and establish common ground and agreements.

Stage Four

The child has developed a huge memory bank and experience. Networking and cooperation have enabled the child to understand the world to a greater extent. This stage of networking and cooperation is reduced to a lesser extent but still a major part of the life of a child. The child now understands that most of the things it had fears about are not things to worry about. The information bank is vast and well developed to such an extent that the child now understands that you are your only enemy. The child now understands that most of its childhood fears are just imaginary in that ghosts and aliens don’t exist. Time and resources spent on fear and defense then decline greatly but there are regrets that the child understands that the real enemy is itself.  Time and resources are now used to maximum and optimal use with very little wastage. There is a sense of panic and regret. Time and resources once devoted to fear of the unknown and defense are now used to advance the child in other areas.

Stage Five

The defense is never on the child’s mind as he or she grows into adulthood instead the child is fully cooperative and networking with many people. Somehow nature makes egocentric views important once again as the child prepares for adulthood. Fears of a different nature sets in.

THE CURRENT PROBLEM: STUCK IN DEFENSIVE STAGES

Looking at mankind a clear picture is emerging. Mankind has gone in circles and is still stuck in the first stages of development where defense plays a paramount part.   In this stage, everything is centered around defense.  Mankind is afraid. Fear is his greatest challenge. He spends $trillion on defense at the expense of other needs. Fear plays a major role in all his decision.  The fear causes less networking and cooperation. Fear hinders people from coming together to understand each other. Fear hinders cooperation. Fear makes it hard to trust anyone. Most of the fear was and is still just perceived fear that is and was turned into actual fear by your leaders to justify the huge budgets on defense and the military.  Every time someone develops a greater understanding of life and advocate for the world to move away from the defensive economies to more advanced systems, your leaders engage in dirty tricks to instill fear so that defense remains top of everything we do. In some circumstances going to lengths to make sure that defense and fear play a crucial role in whatever we do.  Last time it was the aliens and Unidentified Flying Objects [UFOs] of the sixties but recently terrorism has become a major issue, but the goals are still the same as these politicians. We can see a pattern developing. The next stage of development is the networking and cooperation among many leaders, and this has started to happen with sworn enemies coming together to negotiate and even out their differences. In such circumstances there is no need for weapons and huge defense budget, is there? We are all now advanced and knowledgeable to know that there are no aliens or UFOs but just devious tricks by your politicians who are afraid to start something completely new and move away from defensive systems. Would you be surprised that terrorism is now the main concern of all nations? It’s not a coincident no. The system is designed and is manipulated that it gives justification for being and stuck in defensive economies. Ask yourself this. If there are no threats from other countries, why would we build weapons and spend huge amounts of money on defense? I have read of countries with the lowest living standards plowing huge amounts of money into defense instead of into food and development programs. The West has played a major role in that area as well. Parading missiles and testing these sending fear among other weaker countries that they end up buying weapons and investing in defense instead of other areas. It’s simple, common sense. The developed countries manufacture weapons. They have spent years investing in defense and weapons. Now the world is shifting nevertheless slowly away from defensive economies that means no market for the weapons. How can the developed world make more weapons when wars are a thing of the past? How can they stop also after investing so hugely in defense?  They are stuck in a limbo leaving all this behind is like a total waste. We have human rights organizations everywhere now fighting for human rights. A step necessary to move away from defensive economies. The only effective way now is to pass laws that bring accountability to your leader’s doorstep making them accountable one-way or the other. We have crimes of aggression now as a law. Over the years a few people have realized that we need to do more to force your leaders to move away from defensive economies to the other stage of development. Nature intended humans to move fast just like in the child development process but sadly after 2000 years, we are stuck in the first stage of a child’s development stage. Humanity has left everything to chance to hope that nature will take its role and lead humanity in the right path but that’s not happening. A few people have now taken things into their own hands and are now starting to turn ideas into laws. We can’t let these politicians make women and kids suffer just for them to have jobs and paychecks. Every time there is a war, women and children die needlessly. Something that can be avoided. A man-made problem that can be avoided surely, we passed that stage when a few can play God at everyone’s expense. Who will defend these people who are used as baits just so that these evil people have jobs and titles to feel good about themselves? Surely this is expected in the medieval stages where society was corrupt and the governments there to save a few with certain privileges. Everything was centered around defense and protection of the few perceived more important than others? I am saying mankind has taken the easy way, the road of manipulation and use of dirty tricks to leave us stuck in the defensive economies when we should be networking and cooperating as nature intended. Imagine if all the world’s money currently being spent on weapons etc. is diverted to other areas. Do you think we will have the problems we are having today? Defensive systems are the easiest and something we as human beings have experienced over the past 2000 years. You will be shocked to find out that we are living exactly like the early man the only difference is that the threats and our fears have developed as well. Imagine the time mankind had no method of communication. The time sign language was common. Surprisingly we are back to those days. Some few countries are now hacking all their citizens in the name of protection a form of defense rooted in defensive thinking. Now their people can’t talk freely and must rely on sign language or an advanced form but nevertheless a sign language to communicate in case someone is listening to their conversation. Now they are like the early man who can’t talk.  These countries are breaking the Jus Cogens laws by hacking their citizens in the name of protection. These same countries are sponsoring and inciting terrorism to justify their illegal acts. These countries are taking humanity back to the medieval times the only difference being that back then mankind was less advanced to have learned to communicate unlike now when these evil nations are breaking laws hacking everyone even their unsuspecting people.  How can you speak when people are listening to your conversations without your secrets being intercepted? These few nations are carrying out blanket surveillance which is illegal. No matter what the justification is, mankind is reliving the middle ages again simply because some countries are breaking the peremptory laws that were placed to safeguard your rights and help mankind move away from defense economies. Considering that these countries are making digital agents that imitate epidemics of the medieval times when mankind was ravaged by diseases with plagues claiming millions. These few nations are now using these digital agents to communicate and as a sign language. The underlying notion here is that they are involved in illegal practices. They are breaking laws contrary to international laws. These same people are hindering the movement from these defensive economies. These nations are making agents and using these to extract money and resources globally. This is a way of creaming the world making humanity think about defense throughout our existence. These nations have relied on cheap ways to gather vast resources and have invested a lot in this kind of weaponry to make the whole world depended on defensive economies. Surely nature intended humanity to follow the path adopted by a child as I have illustrated above. The underlying notion here is that wars and weapons are perceived as the easiest way to get anything your leaders or these nations want. They don’t have to pay a fair market price and will still always get what they want.  For them, it’s a win-win situation but one that is less advanced yet a costly barbaric method.]

I am saying that humanity is not working at its optimal capacity.  Our systems are very wasteful and incompetent. Imagine how much is spent on weapons globally. Imagine the vast stockpiles of weapons stocked in bunkers and everywhere. If all that was money in the bank it could have accumulated interest enough to eliminate the problems we are having now. So, what I propose is this. I am going to devise laws that will force humanity to move away from defensive economies. This is for the betterment of mankind. Mankind MUST be guided out of this vicious cycle. 2000 years is a long time and we as a people should have been on another level of development. A stage when we don’t think about defense and where defense does not play a major role. Imagine the resources we use for defensive purposes? If that money is channeled somewhere else surely humanity would be in a better position.  I am very glad that some very brave few people have fought and won so that a law is passed to help humanity abandon the defensive stage. I am talking about the crimes of aggression, but I must admit this law does not go further as expected. This is a major step towards abandoning defensive economies. Your leaders are now made accountable for acts that exonerates wars. Wars are characteristics of uncivilized societies. Uncivilized in that the people involved are not advanced enough to acquire resources they need, and it could be money.  These nations can’t afford to pay a fair market price because the commodities sought are scarce and the price easily goes high due to the increase in demand. Imagine a system where money is abundant. Why wage war when another sovereign nation with precious resources e.g. oil in their country decides to nationalize their resources when the other country can easily buy the resources they need at any price? Affordability is the main problem. So, as I have argued above in this case and to your leaders, the best option is to make weapons and use the weapons to get the expensive ones. The money they had they used this to make weapons. Now they must use the weapons to get the resources by force. Surely a deep analysis of this will only point to inefficiency, unfair and a barbaric-medieval way of thinking all because of emphasis on defense other than anything else. This is the problem as your leaders limit other options as being stuck in defensive economies foreshadows other areas and forbids new thinking. In the world I have in mind; something I will advance profusely in this book is the fact that if in the first place we acknowledge that we are superior and smart enough to understand that we are our only enemies then the rest can be changed. Once that is clear only then can we start making the right decisions. If in the first place, we foresaw the need for oil resources we would have saved enough money to buy oil at any price. We could not have spent $trillions on weapons we don’t need instead we would have bought oil resources. The other country might have plowed the profits back into oil. That way they could have found cheaper ways of purifying the oil or processing it that in-turn would have made the oil prices lower and affordable in the long run. It is a fact that periods of great human rights campaigns are marked with great acts of violence. The idea behind human rights campaigners is to set mankind in the right direction but your leader’s device dirty tricks to instill fear and make defense our priority. So, I think the question that keep popping in your head is this. How then can we move away from defensive economies when you are rightly saying that any attempt is marred by acts of unforeseen violence to instill fear among us?

It’s not easy but it can be achieved. I think this is a new topic I am raising here. I am going to profusely advocate that I will put things in place to make sure humanity will move away from defensive economies whether they like it or not. I know changing habits might be difficult and its mankind’s greatest strength to stick to what he has known to have worked but also his greatest weakness. Of course, there will be stiff resistance. Most of these people do this because it is beneficial to them. They can bully everyone and get away with it. They can engage in dirty tricks and still get away with it. For most they have recreated the medieval to instill fear and control people justifying their actions on the need to defend themselves and in most cases, they are the greatest threat to humankind. Imagine how many people died in medieval times due to plagues? Millions if history said it right. Someone who will attempt to recreate that is the worst enemy of mankind; hence the term Hostis Humani Generis. It’s not thinkable that a reasonable man can recreate something that nearly wiped humanity off the face of the earth. Some people and nations can’t understand the grave meaning of such actions simply because no one has told them otherwise. To them, it’s a way of life but to most the greatest crime humanity can ever witness. So how then? Okay, I think first I will look at the crimes of aggression.

Crimes of Aggression.

The idea gives you goosebumps knowing that at last women and children around the world are protected to some extent from unlawful needlessly killing. Some nations kill thousands of women and children in foreign countries like dogs and run around pretending to care. Look at the Iraq war 500 000 women and children died just a few years ago yet no one has been held accountable for this? How can you justify killing such many people? It’s shocking and unbelievable that the world can just sweep this under the carpet and let women and kids’ murderers walk away and boost for saving people? If these were their own people would they have accepted such a justification? I personally think the crimes of aggression although the idea is appealing does not go deep enough to tackle the issue. A crime should not have time limits. I think it’s unfair and absurd that certain crimes are given a time limit, and some are not. I personally think that the crimes of aggression do not do anything at all to correct the past wrongs. A crime should not have a time limit, and this should be for all crimes. The crimes of aggression laws were implemented by institutions erected by the very people at the center of the crime. In that, they adopted and implemented it just to show off and to cover-up. Why the time limit? It’s unfair to say okay it can only work or come into force from the day we did not do anything wrong but what about the time you were at the forefront of evil? I will personally advocate that for the system to be fair and to initiate the healing process and the move away from these defensive economies there shall never be a time limit. If the person who commits the crime is alive, he or she is liable and accountable for all his actions on earth. This is the only way people are going to move away from defensive economies and abandon evil acts altogether. I will advocate that any crime committed within the last 70-100 years be dug out and be assessed. The only leniency will be regarding the severity of the crimes. This is the only way humanity will move away from defensive economies. Take the terrorist arguments for example. They argue that whatever they do is in response to atrocities committed in the past or happening now triggered by this defensive approach of running a country. If all crimes for the past hundred years are assessed, and the people tried if they are still alive that will be the only step toward reconciliation, networking, and negotiations some things necessary for humanity to move away from defense economies. The way this law was implemented is wrong. It would have been a cornerstone to solving the world’s problems but the fact that its cherry-picked other nation’s crimes is not just unfair but a crime against mankind as a whole in itself. To solve the world’s problems, we should have a standard test that does not discriminate and favor the culprits and give them immunity. I propose to fight to have this law implemented fairly. The only way that is true and correct. There is a pattern that is emerging in that some nations wait to commit crimes first and after getting what they want, they then quickly establish laws that give them immunity but claim to persecute whoever commits the crime after they have already committed a crime themselves. For the law to stand and be honored the crimes of aggression law should not have a time limit. I know most would say it was not formulated as a law the time they carried out the acts in question but still that can’t give some people immunity because everyone knows that killing 500 000 noncombatant women and children is a crime. A law or not killing 500 000 women and children is a crime. Everyone knows this before or after the crimes of aggression became a law. The current system is biased. Simply because all the institutions that are passing these laws were created by the very people we should be hanging. The whole system is biased and corrupt. It’s there just to give immunity to the real culprits. These institutions are extended-hands of the people we are saying that are real threats to human existence. So, this is what I will do.

Make sure there are no time limits if the person who committed the crimes is alive any proceedings should be brought against that person if he has committed a crime. Humanity is stuck in the defensive stage because of this. I propose to assess all acts deemed to be crimes and bring everyone concerned to justice simply because they knew that this was a crime when they carried out the acts being a law or not. We have the Jus Cogens notions or laws in some countries that can be used to justify such a stance. These laws are there as deterrents to safeguard humanity. Everyone is aware and no one should use ignorance as an excuse. Considering this the only way a person can escape is only when he or she is dead. Only death shall set you free and, in some cases,  you can still be punished after your death. If that person is breathing, he or she must be made accountable. We have seen old former Presidents mainly of African countries dragged by the International Criminal Court to the Hague in their old age so why can’t this be universal?

To move away from defensive societies a system crash must happen to justify a complete move and abandoning of the current defensive system, something I advocated in all my books and something I am saying that has already happened. The only problem with the current thinking is to wait until humanity is extinct to believe that the system has crashed. This would be the ideal system crash to force humanity to change but isn’t that suicidal as this results in human extinction. Now you see why it is tough to move away from defensive economies. This is the main reason why mankind has been stuck in this stage for more than 2000 years. I explained in other books that a system crash can automatically raise the need for a completely new start. The only way defensive economies can be rendered obsolete is when there is a total collapse of world economies or total wipe-out of humans. This will somehow also be the end of defensive economies if mankind remains feeding this bad habit. Imagine all the weapons we are stockpiling and the new dangerous ones we are making underground, then imagine a system that keeps making these weapons and piling them when there are no wars? Imagine when we all talk and cooperate but still pile weapons. Who is going to buy the weapons? Who are we going to use the weapons on? Imagine also the disgruntled people who are starved as money is used to make weapons. The system will reach a point that a small frictional moment can trigger a global nuclear war that will result in the extinction of mankind. So, a complete change can only come by if there is a system crash, but a crash is something we don’t need because letting that happen means the end of humanity something we don’t want too. So how can we move away from defensive societies?

A clean slate. 

A complete start can only be achieved if we as humans we apply laws to all crimes committed by anyone still existing. Those who have died have automatic immunity. The idea is to clean the whole system without causing its collapse. This can only be achieved by applying laws that cover everyone alive today. This is only the start of a clean-up process. The only way to move forward. The only way to stop revengeful acts. The only way to tell the world that we are ready to forgive each other and move forward. The only way humanity will abandon defensive economies. As far as it stands evil can only breed evil. The world will heal faster this way to pave the way for a new beginning, a new people. A New World without weapons. This is the only way we are going to have World War Three. Hold on! No one talked about World War Three.

Yes, I thought I could surprise you. See the problem is that my solutions pave the way to a new start. A new beginning by getting rid of the people who should be killed. But don’t forget the reason why they are killing now is that they have people behind them who don’t care if 500 000 women and kids die or not. We are all smart enough to know that this is wrong being a law or not. There are peremptory laws in the form of the Jus Cogens which were there to deter and educate mankind and these laws are universal that the claim of ignorance will not succeed. Above all most of these countries would refuse to destroy these weapons and might choose to use them instead. Imagine telling them that you spent $trillion on useless weapons instead of on bars of gold or shares in stock markets. Surely that would make some of them jump on the defensive side and attack instead. Don’t forget the idea is to try to move these people from these inferior ways of thinking into superior thinking. I know most brag that the countries they invaded are better off today than before they invaded. Remember the idea is not to judge the before and the after. That is not the theme of this book. The idea is to apportion blame for the killing of innocent women and children. We know you removed a tyrant, but you also killed 500 000 women and children and that automatically label you a tyranny worse than this killer because you are killing people with different genetic heritage to yours with no due care. This evidenced by the fact that in their country one child dies the world country is brought to a standstill. Just because of that a time limit on a Crime of Aggression will not suffice to give anyone immunity. I am saying that this is not just a Crime of Aggression. It is a lack of empathy-motivated attack with no due regard to women and children of other genetic heritage. The fact that they make the noise crying for blood if it’s one of theirs and cry for immunity if it’s thousands of other genetic heritages is just pathetic. The idea is not to make everything a genetic heritage thing but to put an end to future acts and to reconcile and heal these acts that have a lack of empathy connotations MUST be addressed. I understand also a third argument can be applied to such crimes in that any crimes that have a lack of empathy implications should have at least twenty-five years as the minimum time period that can last before the people are brought to justice. I will challenge any time limits based on the above arguments. My idea is to make it mandatory that no woman or kid will ever die needlessly because of a war. The fourth argument I will advance is the fact that we need to assess the main reasons behind invading and if the ideas are for personal gains and something I will call Society Collapse tactics, then the acts should be brought to the court regardless of when they were committed. The idea applies in cases like the Iraq war where the people involved juiced up dossiers fraudulently and recklessly to get approvals such acts should not be ignored. The fifth aspect will be the material gains from such an illegal war. This is something I will look at in detail later. If the idea behind the war was to extract resources like oil rather than liberating the people, this should be weighed in relation to the number of civilians killed especially women and children. In other words, does it look like they killed women and children just to get oil resources? Considering this I think it should also be established if other methods were available that would be effective without the heavy cost of civilian lives. If other methods are available, then a heavy burden is placed on the people in question. I know most people would say if you were in these people’s shoes how would you handle the situation? In short in my world, the military is replaced by assassins. If it means having thousands of assassins on the payroll so be it. There is a saying that one man for himself and God for us all. That is if you believe there is a God and if you don’t, then you can say; one man for himself and TWO for us all. So why should 500 000 women and children be killed on behalf of a tyranny? It makes no sense and is not fair. Who will defend and stand for the rights of these women and children? Can’t you see that justice was not done here? This is fresh blood and yet the same countries continue to carry on with evil acts. It’s true it’s human nature if people do nothing then nothing can be achieved. The Crime of Aggression law is just sugar-coating to make everything look alright without substances. What should be done is to turn all military personnel into the highly trained assassins who don’t need massive weaponry? Men who will be lethal and men who are trained to target. Saddam in the Iraq case died a hero in that 500 000 women and children perished as well as him. If the world was fair, these people would be hanged too because they are no better than Saddam just another of his versions. So, to answer the above question. I would not worry if all army is retained but it would be ideal for all to be highly trained to target specific subjects. I think if this was so then even Saddam would not have done whatever he was accused of having done. These people do evil acts because they act and operate as a group therefore, they are given automatic immunity to continue carrying out evil acts. Imagine if all army personnel were highly-trained-lethal-assassins who target with a pistol or a rifle only who go about hunting people, we are saying are evil? Do you think we would have these evil people? Imagine knowing that there are thousand trained lethal marksmen to take you down any minute surely no one would think of killing a woman or child ever again. These people kill recklessly women and children because they know that more women and children will die first before anyone can even think of getting to them. Imagine where everyone knows that the mask men will only come for them and no one else. Imagine a world where a man is for himself and God for us all. Imagine a world when trained highly lethal assassins are lurking everywhere in civilian clothes. Surely this is my world and the only way humanity will move away from defensive economies. No point in making huge missiles when the assassin will aim just the tyrant. This will also provide better-paid jobs. This will build trust in the military and army. The men and women will be honored as they used to be. They can’t be labeled as women and children killers. This will give our boys high self-esteem and view the military as a career to be proud of. This will free resources to advance these soldiers-turned-assassins as weapons are phased out.

So, it will be passed as a law and made illegal or a crime for anyone to give a military directive or order that will result in the death of a woman or child no matter what the circumstances. Again, no time limits. The idea behind my thinking is that this is a common universal knowledge that it’s not just evil but reckless and irresponsible to get women and children to be killed. We have the Jus Cogens laws that say it is bad and wrong and therefore illegal. Everyone knows this. We have people highlighting this during the campaigns to stop the war. We have people demonstrating against the war mainly because wars kill innocent women and children.

If there is a tyrant pay your soldiers or trained assassins and let them loose like wild dogs and hunt this tyrant.

I will make the making of weapons nuclear or otherwise and all missiles illegal and a thing of the past. Sorry but tough luck you might have invested in the development of missiles’ technology but it’s no longer legal. Its mankind’s poor management to waste resources on things we don’t need. Others are dying of hunger when we spent $trillions on weapons after all the resources that are used to build the weapons are sourced cheaply from the same countries the missiles are intended to be used.

There shall be a ban on all military vehicles unless for the protection of the President and other members of parliament. Any weapons and vehicles for attacking will be banned and stopped. Only armored cars would be given permits to be manufactured.

The idea is to regard the soldiers as people as well as people with values, rights to life and family life until old age. In that light laws should be drafted to safeguard the life of soldiers throughout their career. It should be a thing of the past that we have thousands of our finest dying very young. Soldier’s jobs should be like any other job that safeguard the life of a soldier and put things in place to make sure they have chances of living until old age. Criminal proceedings should be brought where soldiers die young needlessly. I know most would argue that if no soldiers died, the world could not sustain the population. At first glance it seemed true bearing in mind that hundreds of thousands of soldiers die in wars, but do you know how much is spent on weapons, etc. That money can be diverted to be used for enhancing mankind’s life. All these technologies can be used to enhance life as we know it today.

There will be a total ban on the making of bio-weapons and their digital counterparts. It shall be a law and illegal to make such weapons. There are no aliens, and no one shall take us back to medieval times. These people are cheap useless bastards who use bio-weapons or digital ones to rob and suppress others. We want a society where everyone works very hard for what they have in life. We don’t want a society where bio-agents are used to control, manipulate and oppress others or where people are loaded with bio-digital weapons for being lazy as protection for being lazy. To us, these nations are making illegally prohibited weapons bio-engineered or digital ones for that matter. These are then used as watermarks to seal and protect those who are lazy to work who would rather be injected with this dirty stuff instead of earning a proper living through hard work. Stiff penalties and trust me, a date with the marksmen for nations and people doing this. The idea is to view nations and or people who make bio-weapons to rob others unfairly as Hostis Humani Generis and as such to be treated as such. I will get our best marksmen and unleash them. The world should be a better place for everyone.

CHAPTER TWO

THE PURPOSE AND VALUE OF LIFE.

Why are we here on earth? Why were we born? What is that we are expected to do? Expected to accomplish in life? Or maybe I should ask if there is a reason for our existence? Are we just born to repopulate the earth to continue the existence of mankind? What is the value of life? What is your life worth? Or maybe I should ask what would you exchange for your life if any? In other words, what kind of things do people sacrifice their lives for in return? I personally think that humanity is still less educated and knowledgeable about the value of life and our purpose here on earth. If there were stages to the advancement of knowledge about life, let’s just say for argument’s sake that there are five stages to the knowledge and values placed on life.

Stage One

This is the stage where nothing is known about the value of life. Mankind in this stage is guided by instincts and pain to realize the need to self-preserve. Mankind in this stage leaves everything to chance simply because he lacks the true knowledge of the value of life and he exists through luck, chance and through learning about the risks that surround him. Instincts induced by fear and pain make him or her take precautionary measures to self-protect. His existence, according to him or her, is purely by coincidence. He just happened to be there and must adapt and live each day as it comes. He is like the-early-man. Learning from mistakes. His knowledge base is empty or just filling up. He is inexperienced and knows only that his role is to populate the earth.

Stage Two.

In this stage instincts and pain still plays a major role but his knowledge base has increased, and memory now plays a major role in decision making and the value he places on his life. Past encounters with life-threatening forces have helped build his knowledge base. He is much aware that he must self-defend and self-preserve, but he is willing to sacrifice his life for other beliefs he might have. He acknowledges that in life, sometimes he must sacrifice his life for a good cause central to his beliefs. He might be willing to end his life for a great cause. In this stage, there is a common belief that death is not the end but just the beginning. Mankind in this stage believes that honor and the need to be remembered for doing something good play a critical part. We see mankind in this stage fighting for a cause wholeheartedly but also acknowledging that such an act can end with the loss of his life. Here he places more value on the cause he is fighting than to his life in the hope that somehow his death might also help achieve the cause he is fighting. The value of life is somehow not appreciated than the cause someone is fighting for. In other words, mankind is willing to sacrifice his life for some gain or better place after death. There is a strong belief in life after death and religion plays a key role. People in this stage can be said to be uneducated about the value of life and are easily manipulated and tricked. Their beliefs are centered around someone else. Self-esteem about their life is somehow skewed. Life is generally hard, and people would only sacrifice their life for a better one somewhere in heaven or paradise.

Stage Three.

In this stage, mankind is well educated to know that life is more important than anything else. Self-preservation plays a greater role in all his or her decisions. Self-esteem is high and mankind is well knowledgeable about life and rarely considers sacrificing his life for anything. Religion plays a low-part in his life. Mankind in this stage believes that there is no afterlife. What is here on earth that is that and aims to live life to the fullest? Everything is planned and centered around self-preservation. Mankind in this stage do everything, to eliminate dangers to life. He carefully plans everything and avoids anything and including jobs that threaten life. In this stage, mankind believes that he exists so he can live longer and more comfortably. Self-esteem is very high. He comes first in whatever he does. His sole existence is to the betterment of mankind and in enhancing life. He believes that there are other people in life who are important than him but is unwilling to sacrifice his life for anyone. He believes that there is a superior being [God] out there but at the same time acknowledges that that superior being created him the same as his image so that mankind can become his own god and not bother him. So, he tries to live his life as a small god but believes that one day when he has done his best here on earth, he will meet this superior being that created him. Mankind in this stage believes that yes there is a superior being but that he cannot sacrifice his life to this superior being until his days are over naturally. Mankind in this stage value life and will never sacrifice their life for anyone even for god let alone any leaders. Self-preservation plays a key role.

Stage Four.

      In this stage, mankind is very knowledgeable about the value of life and everything centers around preserving life to the fullest. Mankind in this stage avoids anything that puts a risk to his own life. Self-defense rather than self-preservation takes center stage. In this stage, mankind is very proactive. He acts and plans to preserve life. He plans everything very carefully avoiding anything that puts a risk to his life. He avoids anything that will threaten his existence. He is on the go, looking for new ways to do things that avoid risks to life. He is always proactive planning ahead, innovating and educating others around him about the need for self-defense. Instead of just focusing on ways to preserve the life he acts in advance to self-defense. In this stage, religion plays a minimal part. Yes, he acknowledges the existence of a superior being but also believes that the superior being [God] created him with his own image and as such he wants him to be his own god. This superior being created mankind so mankind can grow and advance to be like him [God] one day. He believes that God or any superior being who created the earth wanted mankind to end up like him, so he chose the heaven to be his place of residence if you like and created the earth to be mankind’s place of residence. This superior being is just and good. He gave himself the heaven as his and created the earth as mankind and to be honest does not want mankind in heaven. Why? When he had put a lot of effort into creating the earth for mankind. Gods in heaven and man on earth. Man must learn and advance to reach his stage. Mankind cannot rely on God. This God does not want to be bothered. He is like a tutor or master or godfather who gets a pupil or a protégé and trains him so that one day he will become like him. In that sense, he is training mankind so that mankind will evolve one day and become a small god. In this light this God wants mankind to grow, advance and evolve to his standard. God or any superior being that is if you don’t believe in God has created mankind by his image. He wants mankind to be like him. If only he can master and fully understand what is needed to become God. It is a challenge, but he has faith in mankind that he will learn and discover all the tricks needed to evolve to his standard so that mankind becomes a small god who will end up growing big like the real God and one-day rule earth just like God rules the heavens. This God or superior being is just and to be honest does not need mankind. He created mankind out of boredom so that he can train and set up challenges mankind must tackle and overcome so that mankind evolves and fully becomes aware of what is needed to reach his standard. Fearing that mankind will take the easy road and run to him as a dependent he gave them an option that if mankind fails, he is still welcome to come and stay with him in heaven but honestly this is not part of his plan. It’s like a Plan B thing. Okay if you have failed then there is still room for you. Just like a father who is ‘driving- or self-motivating’ his son. He guides him until he is eighteen. After eighteen he buys his son a piece of land. He expects his son one day to become his own man and end up with his own family. His intention from the word go is to make the son independent of him. To build him through guidance and let him be his own man. I don’t think that this father expects his son one day to come back to his own house and say; father I have failed can I move back in? No. Okay, he might say the door is open for you my son but only as a last resort when all has failed you can still come and stay with us. His aim is to build his son so that he can become like him one day, have his own family and roof above his head. This is the same as God. If God or any superior being can create man and earth, it is not because he wants mankind to come one day and stay with him. Just like the scenario above about a father and his son. His aim is to build a man in his own image. A man who will become like him and have his own house. Likewise, God created mankind so he can rule the earth and make the earth his. All this talk about going to heaven if you die is just untrue. To him, it’s a sign of failure. If it’s an exam, he will simply say you have failed because what he expected was for mankind to prove he can be smarter to solve the puzzle and the riddle and evolve to his status and become gods here on earth. Paradise and heaven are stages that must be reached here on earth and not places in heaven. Okay, these places might literally be in heaven, but God wants mankind to achieve that stage in life where earth becomes like heaven. It is a stage that must be reached. Mankind must crack the code to achieve such a level and it’s not something that can be earned by being a suicide bomber nor by dying for a great leader. It is a stage in human development that must be achieved here on earth and not a shortcut to heaven by ending one’s life. Education in this stage plays a greater role. Today’s leaders some understand this but know that too that if the people are aware of this, then there won’t be reasons for them to be in power. No one would die for them everyone will do whatever it takes to self-defend and self-preserve. In such a society human rights abuse is minimal as the leaders know no one will self-terminate for them as they would rather take them down. This stage to you all is the stage that is preached in the bible or Quran and a stage that is known in religious circles as paradise. There is a great misconception that these places only exist in heaven. Okay, the idea hints to places in heaven but the truth is that it is a stage in human development that mankind MUST reach one day a theme or idea that is central to this book. Education about the importance of life is crucial if mankind is to move up the development stages. This is a theme that is central to this book I reiterate here. Something I think is not understood and as such I think we are still may be in the stage, two of the development stages of the value of life mentioned above. It will take a lot for mankind to understand that at one stage we ought to be in stage four at least. I think you will all agree with me when I say early man had a slight view of life than us. Likewise, when humanity reaches stage four of the value placed on life surely, they can say people of our generation had different views about life than the ones before. Stage four is a stage mankind here on earth must accomplish one day. It is a stage in the development process that must be reached and not a place in heaven where one must end his life in order to reach. It is a riddle, a puzzle if you like that must be solved to be achieved. Paradise or heaven is known to be a place where people of all genetic heritage come together and cooperate with each other for the harmony and peaceful existence of mankind. It is a stage when mankind doesn’t see boundaries and or differences. This is a stage we as humans ought to achieve one day here on earth a theme common to all my books [see Carolinadeivid books]. Mankind is still in the defensive stages of development [Read the Vice President the Electronic transfer]. I argued that for over two thousand years we as humans have remained stuck in the defensive economies when we MUST be in other stages of development where cooperation and networking are paramount. I will look at this idea below when I look at my development stages. When we as human beings have acquired such knowledge that there is more to life than fighting for a good cause then can we only begin to move ahead through the development stages? I believe we all have one shot at life. You only live once. I believe heaven and paradise are stages that MUST be reached here on earth one day. Mankind at some time in the future will move away from the current defensive economies when weapons and wars are used to control the population, get the rather-would-be expensive resources like oil cheaply and provide for the existence of mankind. Just picture all your leaders without the military or talk about defense and wars. They would be like naked models using their hands to cover themselves or hiding everywhere. Imagine a world that does not talk about war or death of women and children, death of soldiers or heated exchange of words between leaders. Today it seems impossible and boring not to do that. Simply because defense in this stage of development we are in is the main driving force. We are still in the defensive stages of development. Your today’s leaders without defense are totally useless. They all rely on defense. Globally we spend $ trillions year after year on defense. Worse nowadays when everyone is starting to realize that we can all live together without wars. Money is channeled to the wrong use when we are no longer in need of weapons. The population is still growing rapidly. Your leaders have used wars to reduce government spending by getting our finest boys and girls die in wars needlessly. Driving the economy through cutting spending as thousand names are wiped off the government bill, state release of insurance money of deceased soldiers to their wives who in-turn spend the money to boost the economy. Reducing the number of people, easing pressure on land and resources by bombing them and making sure that the government act just like God who uses natural disasters to keep population in check. We are still stockpiling thousands of weapons and still creating more and more military wings worldwide just to justify the defensive economies we have adopted and stuck onto when we should be moving to networking and cooperation a stage needed to move toward paradise and heaven-like stages. The main problem is that this is the only way mankind has known to do things. The military plays a key role and has played a major part since the early man. But I understand the reason behind the early man’s emphasis on defensive stages. A dinosaur, the mammoth or the saber-toothed-cat trust me were fear-inducing menacing creatures that could make a strong man shiver with fear. Not that I have physically seen one, but the images of these animals are terrifying. But since then these creatures have gone extinct and I am like what next why still putting scarce resources on defense? Come the early 1960 with the rise of the rights movements. People now we’re starting to understand that we as humans are living below our potential. We were stuck in the defensive economies that were justified by the presence of some menacing creatures but honestly, all these have since gone extinct so why then are we still in this stage? This is the only stage that overrides other laws pertaining to human life and rights. This is the only power stage where your leaders can abuse you and show you power by killing those you are supposed to protect and value etc. without you doing anything. This is the only stage that justifies whatever they do. The only stage that makes them little gods. Your leaders simply because without defense they are nothing and for them to continue abusing your rights they created fictional stories just to justify a huge defense budget at the expense of our rights. They started talking about UFOs and aliens just to keep everyone hooked on defense. They know if they are to let the rights movements take over then there won’t be a need for them. No one would die for them. For what? To justify huge defense budgets, more missiles that could reach aliens and UFO’s ships above earth were developed. When it was discovered that all this alien thing and UFOs was a hoax, they encouraged assassinations of all rights activists sending fear everywhere to justify defensive economies. It is also in this era that we started seeing the rise of terrorist activities just to justify huge defense budgets. But why defense one might ask? It is the easiest road known to your leaders to do their job. In your mind replace defense [military etc.] with projects that encourage networking like removal of boundaries and joining all countries linking all airports and roads etc. Then picture your leaders. Do they fit as the project managers, the leaders of such nations? Mostly the answer is no. Probably he or she was elected simply because he promised a war with another country or simply, he promised to increase the military spending when there won’t be any war. Okay in that case we are just stockpiling weapons when there is no prospect of any war. Look at North Korea and the USA a classic example. A few years back these were sworn enemies now they are cooperating, which is good, but the problem is that we are still making weapons. Are we expecting aliens? Are we expecting UFOs? Maybe the rise again of the dinosaurs, the mammoths or the saber-tooth-cats? Who then is our enemy when we are all becoming friends? I am not saying it’s a bad thing I am simply asking if it is not also wise to move away from defensive economies considering the changing political environment. In chapter one I proposed my world. Cut defense. Train our boys to the highest standards as assassins. Increase their wages to levels never seen before as you save on defense cuts. Cut weapons production. Aim to reduce waste. Instead of the rifle approach adopt the shotgun approach. Target. Don’t reduce our military personnel but train all as assassins and bodyguards. Money saved on weapons development like missiles is used to increase the wages of our boys and make the military like any other profession that sees them retiring and having a pension. Write up and implement laws that make your leaders accountable if any soldier dies needlessly. Make it illegal to start wars that kill our best boys and girls, women and children. Make these leaders accountable for their actions and target the culprits. Send our best boys as trained lethal assassins to solve global issues. Make it a crime to still manufacture weapons. Remember Tomorrow’s World Order will have a global impact and no boundaries. Express-command to put an end to this through our laws and courts as a deterrent. A team of dedicated assassins will always be there to perform the orders of our courts.  Any leaders who think they are above the law think again. Instead of getting our best boys die young needlessly we shall protect them with laws. Do you let your best die early or you will keep them alive as possible? Again, like I said education and the need to let everyone know that heaven is here on earth all we need to do is to collectively work together to achieve that. The $trillions we are spending on weapons today will be channeled to the development of highly effective networks that encourage cooperation and interaction as one. I know it will not be easy to make people stop weapons manufacturing and move away from defensive economies but it’s a challenge we MUST tackle together to move through the development channels. Why it is difficult now is that there are