Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    From $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Relationships
    Relationships
    Relationships
    Ebook111 pages2 hours

    Relationships

    By Campus London LTD (The School of Life)

    4.5/5

    ()

    Switch to audiobook
    Read preview

    • Love & Relationships

    • Relationships

    • Communication

    • Love

    • Romanticism

    • Love Triangle

    • Love at First Sight

    • Power of Love

    • Star-Crossed Lovers

    • Enemies to Lovers

    • Opposites Attract

    • Love Conquers All

    • Love Makes You Crazy

    • Forbidden Love

    • Mentor

    • Personal Growth

    • Understanding

    • Personal Development

    • Emotional Dependency

    • Childhood Experiences

    About this ebook

    A fresh approach to matters of the heart, Relationships offers practical skills and new attitudes for a more mature vision of love. 


    Since around 1750, we have been living in the era of Romanticism, which has shaped the way we approach love, marriage, and sex. When it comes to love, this book argues, Romanticism has been a disaster. 

    Full of real-life examples, lively humor, and cultural anecdotes, Relationships teaches us: 

    • That love and sex may not always go together (and that's OK)
    • That discussing money early on, in a serious way, is not a betrayal of love
    • That acknowledging respective flaws can be a couple's superpower
    • That we will never find everything we need in another person
    • That spending two hours discussing whether bathroom towels should be hung up or can be left on the floor has its own dignity

    With wisdom, wit, and compassion, this innovative guide paves the way to a new, brighter future for love.

    • LEARN THE SKILL OF LOVE a refreshing, skills-based take on how to approach relationships.
    • PRACTICAL RELATIONSHIP ADVICE that challenges many preconceived assumptions.
    • HARDCOVER WITH RIBBON MARKER beautifully produced, premium gift format.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherThe School of Life
    Release dateJul 28, 2020
    ISBN9780993538797
    Author

    Campus London LTD (The School of Life)

    The School of Life is a groundbreaking enterprise which offers good ideas for everyday living. Founded in 2008, The School of Life runs a diverse range of programmes and services which address questions of personal fulfilment and how to lead a better life. Drawing insights from philosophy, psychology, literature, the visual arts and sciences, The School of Life offers evening classes, weekends, conversation meals and other events that explore issues relating to big themes such as Love,Work, Play, Self, Family and Community.

    Read more from Campus London Ltd (The School Of Life)

    Related to Relationships

    Related ebooks

    Relationships For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related categories

    Reviews for Relationships

    4.5/5

    17 ratings2 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      Practical yet philosophical at the same time. I had lots of takeaways that can help me in my next relationship.
    • 5/5
      Like at lot of The School of Life books, this one contains parts or concepts that exist in some of their other books.
      However, this is probably the most succinct book about love and relationship that they have.
      I really appreciate their pessimistic point of view on partnerships. To accept that we and our partners are flawed and that there is merit to teaching our partners about these flaws. That realistically love is a way of being with our partners that is charitable towards their flawed actions.
      I agree that an ideal world would have us not be forced to find a partner or demean, or feel sorry for those who haven't.
      There is much to be gained from this short book.

    Book preview

    Relationships - Campus London LTD (The School of Life)

    1

    Post-Romanticism

    To fall in love with someone feels like such a personal and spontaneous process, it can sound strange – and even rather insulting – to suggest that something else (we might call it society or culture) may be playing a covert, critical role in governing our relationships in their most intimate moments.

    Yet the history of humanity shows us so many varied approaches to love, so many different assumptions about how couples are supposed to get together and so many distinctive ways of interpreting feelings, we should perhaps accept with a degree of grace that the way we go about our relationships must in practice owe rather a lot to the prevailing environment beyond our bedrooms. Our loves unfold against a cultural backdrop that creates a powerful sense of what is ‘normal’ in love; it subtly directs us as to where we should place our emotional emphases, it teaches us what to value, how to approach conflicts, what to get excited about, when to tolerate and what we can be legitimately incensed by. Love has a history and we ride – sometimes rather helplessly – on its currents.

    Since around 1750, we have been living in a highly distinctive era in the history of love that we can call Romanticism. Romanticism emerged as an ideology in Europe in the mid-18th century in the minds of poets, artists and philosophers, and it has now conquered the world, powerfully (yet always quietly) determining how a shopkeeper’s son in Yokohama will approach a first date, how a scriptwriter in Hollywood will shape the ending of a film, or when a middle-aged woman in Buenos Aires might decide to call it a day with her civil servant husband of twenty years.

    No single relationship ever follows the Romantic template exactly, but its broad outlines are frequently present nevertheless – and might be summed up as follows:

    –  Romanticism is deeply hopeful about marriage. It tells us that a long-term marriage can have all the excitement of a love affair. The feelings of love that we are familiar with at the start of a relationship are expected to prevail over a lifetime. Romanticism took marriage (hitherto seen as a practical and emotionally temperate union) and fused it together with the passionate love story to create a unique proposition: the lifelong passionate love marriage.

    –  Along the way, Romanticism united love and sex. Previously, people had imagined that they could have sex with characters they didn’t love, and that they could love someone without having extraordinary sex with them. Romanticism elevated sex to the supreme expression of love. Frequent, mutually satisfying sex became the bellwether of the health of any relationship. Without necessarily meaning to, Romanticism made infrequent sex and adultery into catastrophes.

    –  Romanticism proposed that true love must mean an end to all loneliness. The right partner would, it promised, understand us entirely, possibly without needing to speak to us. They would intuit our souls. (Romantics put a special premium on the idea that our partner might understand us without words …).

    –  Romanticism believed that choosing a partner should be about letting oneself be guided by feelings, rather than practical considerations. For most of recorded history, people had fallen into relationships and married for logical pragmatic sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing grain business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such ‘reasonable’ marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity and hardness of heart. For Romanticism, the marriage of reason was not reasonable at all, which is why what it replaced it with – the marriage of feeling – has largely been spared the need to account for itself. What matters is that two people wish desperately that it happens, are drawn to one another by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. The modern age has had enough of ‘reasons’, those catalysts of misery. The prestige of instinct is the legacy of a collective traumatised reaction against too many centuries of unreasonable ‘reason’.

    –  Romanticism has manifested a powerful disdain for practicalities and money. Nowadays, under the influence of Romanticism, we don’t like such elements to be at the forefront of the mind around relationships, especially in the early days. It feels cold – un-Romantic – to say you know you’re with the right person because you make an excellent financial fit or because you gel over things like bathroom etiquette and attitudes to punctuality. People, we feel, only turn to practical considerations when all else has failed (‘I couldn’t find love, I had to settle for convenience’) or because they are sinister (the gold-digger, the social climber).

    –  Romanticism believes that true love should involve delighting in a lover in their every aspect. True love is synonymous with accepting everything about someone. The idea that one’s partner (or oneself) may need to change is taken to be a sign that the relationship is on the rocks; ‘you’re going to have to change’ is a last-ditch threat.

    This template of love is a historical creation. It’s a hugely beautiful and often enjoyable one. The Romantics were brilliantly perceptive about some facets of emotional life and were extremely talented about expressing their hopes and longings. Many of the feelings had existed before, but what the Romantics did was elevate them, turning them from passing fancies into serious concepts with the power to determine the course of relationships over a lifetime.

    We can at this point state boldly: Romanticism has been a disaster for love. It is an intellectual and spiritual movement which has had a devastating impact on the ability of ordinary people to lead successful emotional lives. The salvation of love lies in overcoming a succession of errors within Romanticism. Our strongest cultural voices have – to our huge cost – set us up with the wrong expectations. They’ve highlighted emotions that don’t tell us very much that is useful about how to make relationships work, while drawing attention away from others that offer more constructive guidance. We deserve sympathy. We’re surrounded by a culture that offers a well-meaning but fatally skewed ideal of how relationships might function. We’re trying to apply a very unhelpful script to a hugely tricky task.

    This Romantic script is both normative and at points delusional. In order to be thought normal in the age of Romanticism, many of the following are meant to happen:

    –  We should meet a person of extraordinary inner and outer beauty and immediately feel a special attraction to them, and they to us.

    –  We should have highly satisfying sex, not only at the start, but forever.

    –  We should never be attracted to anyone else.

    –  We should understand one another intuitively.

    –  We don’t need an education in love. We may need to train to become a pilot or brain surgeon, but not a lover. We will pick that up along the way, by following our feelings.

    –  We should have no secrets and spend constant time together (work shouldn’t get in the way).

    –  We should raise a family without any loss of sexual or emotional intensity.

    –  Our lover must be our soulmate, best friend, coparent, co-chauffeur, accountant, household manager and spiritual guide.

    Knowing the history of Romanticism should be consoling – because it suggests that quite a lot of the troubles we have with relationships don’t stem (as we normally, guiltily end up thinking) from our ineptitude, our own inadequacy or our own regrettable choice of partners. Knowing the history invites another, more useful idea: we alone are not to blame; we were set an incredibly hard task by our culture, which then had the temerity to present it as easy.

    It seems crucial to systematically question the assumptions of the Romantic view of love – not in order to destroy love, but to save it. We need to piece together a post-Romantic theory of couples, because in order to make a relationship last we almost have to be disloyal to many of the Romantic emotions that get us into it in the first place. The idea of being ‘post-Romantic’ shouldn’t imply cynicism, that one has abandoned

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1