The Art of War: The American War of Independence
()
About this ebook
As the days were passing by, the colonists enjoyed a “salutary neglect.” They were far from the English monarch who enjoyed in turn the bounties of his colonies. The trade on which the colonists and the king relied was of benefit to all of them. Not only did they feel free but also they were loyal to their English king. By the mid 1760’s, the understanding between the American colonies and the mother country was crumbling. The harmony which had existed turned into discord when the English Parliament decided to tax the American colonies because of the high cost of the French and Indian War (1754-1763), and thus all the colonies were thrown into turmoil. The more the colonists rose up against Britain, the more troops the British sent to enforce the laws. From skirmishes to attempts to settle matters, the relations between the two countries were so strained that they could break up at any time.
The war the Continental Congress intended to wage would require money, men and the experience of soldiers skilled in the art form of warfare such as it was waged in the 18th century. The American resistance to power got organized with great difficulty but how could the American colonists hope to defeat the English in the art of war?
Get a deeper understanding of the American war of Independence thanks to this essay.
EXCERPT
A major problem for the American colonists was that one third of the people remained loyal to the crown and another third did not know what to think about the war. The various colonies which rejected the authority of a king did not completely want to rely on the sole authority of a Continental Congress. The only force in the colonies was that of the militias but they were not trained for pitched battles even if they excelled in guerrilla warfare. The Continental Congress realized that relying only on guerrilla warfare would not allow the American colonists to take well populated cities and ports occupied by the British army. In order to win the American War of Independence, they had to demonstrate their ability to fight European types of battles. Then, they would be able to rely on foreign support.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
The author: at the master's level, Jean-Christophe Malevil chose to write his thesis about the American War of Independence; in seeing Roland Emmerich's The Patriot in 2000. He knew he would work on the art of war and to illustrate his work, he of course decided to rely on this movie. This book is the result of the findings of his investigations about war in the 18th century.
Related to The Art of War
Related ebooks
Understanding Primary Sources: Recollections of War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Primary Sources: Colonial Reactions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDefining Duty in the Civil War: Personal Choice, Popular Culture, and the Union Home Front Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDuty, Honor, Country: The Life of Arthur MacArthur, Jr. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThis Destructive War: The British Campaign in the Carolinas, 1780-1782 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mr. Lincoln's Forts: A Guide to the Civil War Defenses of Washington Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inside of Rebeldom: Civil War First Hand Accounts, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Union and the Problem of Neighborhood: The United States and the Collapse of the Spanish Empire, 1783-1829 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPiercing the Heartland: A History and Tour Guide of the Fort Donelson, Shiloh, and Perryville Campaigns Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5A Family and Nation under Fire: The Civil War Letters and Journals of William and Joseph Medill Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA History of the War of 1812 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Military Life & Times of General Sir Miles Dempsey GBE KCB DSO MC: Monty's Army Commander Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Hanoverians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRaising the White Flag: How Surrender Defined the American Civil War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Campaigns for Vicksburg 1862-63: Leadership Lessons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story of My Campaign: The Civil War Memoir of Captain Francis T. Moore, Second Illinois Calvary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Crucible of Fire: The Battle of Lundy's Lane, July 25, 1814 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Britain’s Korean War: Cold War diplomacy, strategy and security 1950–53 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPetersburg 1864–65: The longest siege Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Major General Joseph J. Reynolds And His Division At Chickamauga: A Historical Analysis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Enemy Harassed: Washington's New Jersey Campaign of 1777 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA War Without Rifles: The 1792 Militia Act and the War of 1812 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConquered: Why the Army of Tennessee Failed Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Battle of Pickett's Mill Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuilford Courthouse 1781: Lord Cornwallis's Ruinous Victory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistory of the Civil War: 1861-1865 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5General MacArthur’s Strategic Success During The Early Months Of The Korean War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Essays, Study, and Teaching For You
I'll Be Gone in the Dark: One Woman's Obsessive Search for the Golden State Killer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boys: A Memoir of Hollywood and Family Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Can I Say: Living Large, Cheating Death, and Drums, Drums, Drums Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Must Say: My Life As a Humble Comedy Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mother of Black Hollywood: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Not That Bad: Dispatches from Rape Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pandora's Jar: Women in the Greek Myths Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rabbit: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Defining Moments in Black History: Reading Between the Lies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wild Truth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story of the Trapp Family Singers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Truth: Sex, Love, Commitment, and the Puzzle of the Male Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Souls of Black Folk: The Unabridged Classic Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dust Tracks on a Road: An Autobiography Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Deaf Utopia: A Memoir—and a Love Letter to a Way of Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Water Is Wide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Debunking Howard Zinn: Exposing the Fake History That Turned a Generation against America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Black Wall Street: The Wealthy African American Community of the Early 20th Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedium Raw: A Bloody Valentine to the World of Food and the People Who Cook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Way I Heard It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fortune's Children: The Fall of the House of Vanderbilt Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Profiles in Courage: Deluxe Modern Classic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Land of Hope: An Invitation to the Great American Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Real Lolita: A Lost Girl, an Unthinkable Crime, and a Scandalous Masterpiece Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Memorial Drive: A Daughter's Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Art of War
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Art of War - Jean-Christophe Malevil
Collection
U.S. History on Your Side
Jean-Christophe Malevil
The Art of War:
The
American
War
Of
Independence
U.S. History on Your Side
Introduction
The American colonists had a very special relationship with England since many of them originated from this country. As the days were passing by, the colonists enjoyed a salutary neglect.
They were far from the English monarch who enjoyed in turn the bounties of his colonies. The trade on which the colonists and the king relied was of benefit to all of them. Not only did they feel free but also they were loyal to their English king. During the Seven Years War, siding with their English brothers, they took up arms against the French. After all, they were English subjects and should defend the crown if they were asked to do so. In 1763, the French and Indian War was over. By the mid 1760’s, the understanding between the American colonies and the mother country was crumbling. The harmony which had existed turned into discord when the English Parliament decided to tax the American colonies because of the high cost of the French and Indian War (1754-1763), and thus all the colonies were thrown into turmoil. The more the colonists rose up against Britain, the more troops the British sent to enforce the laws. From skirmishes to attempts to settle matters, the relations between the two countries were so strained that they could break up at any time.
A chain of cause and effect was to disrupt the next years. The colonies declared their independence and plunged into a state of war. The reasons why the colonies wanted to secede from Britain were on different levels. There were those who wanted their liberty for they thought themselves oppressed by a tyrannical ruler or those who wanted freedom to get rid of England with which they had to share a part of their profits.
The Battles of Lexington and Concord (1775) triggered the American War of Independence. Many Americans subscribed to ideals of freedom simmering in the air. They wanted to fight for a just cause, that of liberty, and decide on their own future. They were ready to die. They were motivated. They inherited military techniques from the former French and Indian War but they had to pit their strength against the world’s largest navy and one of the best professional armies.
A major problem for the American colonists was that one third of the people remained loyal to the crown and another third did not know what to think about the war. The various colonies which rejected the authority of a king did not completely want to rely on the sole authority of a Continental Congress. The only force in the colonies was that of the militias but they were not trained for pitched battles even if they excelled in guerrilla warfare. The Continental Congress realized that relying only on guerrilla warfare would not allow the American colonists to take well populated cities and ports occupied by the British army. In order to win the American War of Independence, they had to demonstrate their ability to fight European types of battles. Then, they would be able to rely on foreign support.
The Continental Congress needed strategies, a military establishment like that of England and leadership. The war it intended to wage would require money, men and the experience of soldiers skilled in the art form of warfare such as it was waged in the 18th century. The American resistance to power got organized with great difficulty but how could the American colonists hope to defeat the English in the art of war?
Part I
American
Resistance
to
Power
1. The Rise of Patriotism in the Thirteen Colonies
1.1 Propaganda
In 1765, the Stamp Act generated a political storm for it affected nearly every member of colonial society, but elite leaders assumed direction of the resistance movement. Middle class artisans and business men created the Loyal Nine in Boston to fight the Stamp Act. The Sons of Liberty went as far as using violence to prevent enforcement of British laws. By 1768, all over the Thirteen Colonies, merchants adopted a non-importation non-exportation and non-consumption agreement. This agreement was to collapse in July 1770 but be that as it may, the Sons of Liberty resisted taxation by not drinking taxed tea.
In 1768, Samuel Adams who was closely linked to the Loyal Nine defied Massachusetts’ royal governor by drafting a circular letter to the colonies appealing to them to think about their common grievances. Samuel Adams’ Committees of Correspondence requested that appointed people exchange information and spread it throughout New England. The Committees of Correspondence slowly became effective tools in the fight against Great Britain and coordinated measures to defend colonial rights. Even women themselves had played a major role in the rise of patriotism. The Daughters of Liberty had a moral influence on public opinion.
But thoughts are often higher designs than going up to the front line or making guerrilla warfare are. As early as the 17th century there was a growing feeling of self-reliance among colonists and the feeling that they could be autonomous. These sentiments were transferred into literature and religion
New England and more particularly Boston became a hotbed of revolutionary activism for independence from Great Britain. New England’s Patriots played leading roles in establishing the new nation at the end of the war. Strange as it may be, the majority of colonists had but little enthusiasm about the idea of any independence whatsoever but ten per cent of fervent activists made every effort to win them over.
Propaganda was the main vitriolic and ferocious weapon used by the Patriots to manipulate public attitudes in the colonies and especially in New England where it was organised through meetings and publications. It contributed greatly to the victory. We can define propaganda as being the spreading of ideas, information, or rumour for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
as well as being ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause
{1}. During the American War of Independence, propaganda was above all an organised effort to conceal facts and policies. The role of propaganda was to control public opinion and to stimulate the desire for independence. It was the art of telling people what they wanted to hear. Thomas Paine understood that he had to put the idea in the colonists’ heads that independence was the only good decision to make.
Propaganda had different forms. There were newspapers, pamphlets or speeches whose concepts were often abstract and led to many interpretations. But its very aim was to have power over people’s thoughts. Thanks to Committees of Correspondence, propaganda was floating in the air and slowly began lurking in men’s soul. Thus, the Boston Massacre, which was at the least the result of provocation, passed into American folklore as a characteristically brutal attempt by the military to put down peaceful protest by ill-used citizens.
{2}
The leadership of newspaper publications was in the hands of printers under pseudonyms making mountains out of molehills. The press often gave personal opinions rather than factual accounts. All followed Samuel Adams’s motto: Where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will enkindle it.
Propaganda was used as a weapon and it was as efficient as any military weapon:
Deflowering virgins," together with bayoneting wounded prisoners, was, according to the patriot newspapers, the art of war as practised by the British army.
{3}
The British army punished itself by mistreating its prisoners for those who escaped from its jails were a godsend for propagandists. Benjamin Franklin, for his part, "[compiled] a School Book of choice atrocity stories, profusely illustrated and also
printed a fictitious newspaper… containing an account of the cruelties perpetrated by the Indians at the orders of the British… This fabrication… was regarded as a genuine document."{4} Propagandists made it their duty to show the colonists that Britain was not as fair as she pretended to be and that the forgiveness she promised was but hot air. It was a period when the Patriots needed to convince not only other Americans but also the whole of Europe of the legitimacy of their rebellion.
In 1775, 42 newspapers were published in the colonies{5}, 15 of them were printed in New England. The Boston Gazette had a circulation of several thousand copies. But according to Thomas Hutchinson, governor of Massachusetts, nine tenths of what was read in the newspapers of occurrences in Boston was either utterly counterfeit or revoltingly distorted and adulterated. Moreover, Patriots never hesitated to destroy or burn any press which might have published negative items about them and their actions. But newspapers such as the